2 CFR 1201.1 gives regulatory effect to 2 CFR §200.320 that states that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of 2 CFR §200.320, 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. Furthermore, 2 CFR §200.320(a)(2) states that "small purchases are the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity." Additionally, the County established the "Federal Procurement Policy" through Resolution # 2018-868 which states "for all procurements of $15,000 and greater, the purchaser should obtain documentation verifying that the purchase price is fair and reasonable. Price analysis and cost analysis are the two primary techniques used to accomplish this purpose. 1. Price Analysis: Comparison of prices of multiple bids or information from other sources, such as established catalog or market prices or prices for similar past purchases. 2. Cost Analysis: Evaluation of the separate elements (e.g., labor, materials, etc.) that make up a contractor's total cost proposal or price (for both new contracts and modifications) to determine if they are allowable, directly related to. the requirement and reasonable for the value received. A price analysis should always be performed and documented; under certain circumstances, while a cost analysis also needs to be performed and documented (cost analysis is always required if payment is based in whole or in part on reimbursement of costs, and it may also be required for other contract types when there is not adequate price competition). The County did not follow their established policy which results in errors noted during testing of federal procurement requirements. During testing of the 2023 AL # 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, for one of six procurements selected for testing (17%), which exceeded the micro-purchase threshold but did not exceed the small purchase threshold, the County could not provide documentation supporting that they obtained price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Failure to follow the County's internal policies and failure to adhere to the requirements of 2 CFR §200.320 could result in unallowable purchases, misuse of public funds, or questioned costs related to federal monies. The County should ensure they are following both their internal policies and Federal formal procurement methods when purchases fall within the small purchase threshold.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): SWIF221677 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The County had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement and Suspension and Debarment The County entered into an interlocal agreement with the City to procure services for a Sewer Lift Station Improvement/Line Extension to the New County Jail project. Per the agreement, the City would be responsible for all the procurement and suspension and debarment processes involved in the project, and the County would be responsible for the compliance with all grant funding for the project. On September 23, 2021, the County received notification that it was eligible to receive $1,900,000 from the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA) for a SWIF grant from SLFRF funds with the intention of using the funding for the Sewer project shared by the County and City. The notification stated that co-funding would be provided by the County and that the County could enter into the SWIF grant agreement with the IFA once the funding was secure. On February 24, 2022, the City's Common Council approved a bid with B & T Drainage for the project. On March 6, 2022, the County Council approved a $2,330,000 appropriation from its SLFRF funds for co-financing of the project and, on the same day, signed a grant agreement with the IFA for the SWIF grant funded with SLFRF funds totaling $2,300,000. The project was completed as of December 31, 2023. The County did not provide any of the following documentation requested to verify compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements for the SWIF funds spent on the project: Copy of the original contract for $3,965,507. Copy of any change orders. Copy of the Board minutes where the bid was awarded by the Common Council. Copy of the original bids made on the project. Copy of documentation that vendor was not suspended or debarred. The lack of internal controls and lack of appropriate supporting documentation was isolated to the project noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (c) (1) The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, contractor selection of rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County participated in a joint project with the City in which the City handled the procurement process. As the County was ultimately responsible for compliance, copies of the quotes or bids obtained by the City should have been obtained by the County; however, this documentation was not obtained or provided for audit. In addition, documentation to demonstrate the City checked the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract should have been obtained by County. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure that the services obtained provided full and open competition or the basis of the price. In addition, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SULLIVAN COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Noncompliance with the provisions of federal regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. We also recommended the County adhere to the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements and obtain required bids and verify that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Finally, we recommended the County obtain and retain appropriate documentation for all expenses paid with SLFRF funds. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): OMB Approval #1505-0271 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The County had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The County had one vendor that was identified as being less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeding the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold. The one vendor was selected for testing. For the one vendor, the County did not obtain price or rate quotes nor was there documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Upon inquiring of the County to determine its policies and procedures related to suspension and debarment requirements, the County stated procedures were not in place to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions. One covered transaction paid with SLFRF grant funds was identified during the audit period. The covered transaction totaled $66,000 with $46,752 paid in the audit period. The identified transaction was examined to determine if the County verified the suspension and debarment status of the vendor prior to payment. Upon review, the County had not performed procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified, from participation in federal assistance programs or activities at any time during the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are de-barred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause The County participated in a joint project with the City of Rochester (City) in which the City handled the procurement process. However, the County did not request copies of the quotes or bids obtained by the city, nor did the County document a sole source vendor situation. In addition, the County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate they checked the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into the contract. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure that services obtained provided full and open competition or the basis of the price. In addition, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 FULTON COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In addition, we recommended the County adhere to the procurement policies and obtain required quotes and bids or adequately document a sole source situation. Finally, we recommended that the County strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana State Department of Health Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context Procurement The Indiana State Department of Health created the Health Issues and Challenges Grant Program to provide funding to local and statewide service providers and planning organizations through the American Rescue Plan Act. The funds were to be used to prevent or reduce the prevalence of health issues or improve the health and behavioral health of Indiana residents. The City applied for and was awarded the Health Issues and Challenges grant in the amount of $447,112. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Four vendors fell within the small purchase threshold. Two of the four small purchases were selected for testing. For the two vendors tested, totaling $71,889, the City did not obtain price or rate quotes. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the City did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the rationale for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City establish documented procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In additions, we recommended the City adhere to the procurement policies. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 CITY OF NEW CASTLE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR 200.317 - 200.327. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-Federal entity must: (1) Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319. (2) For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-Federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(c). 31 CFR 19 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR Section 180.305 which states that Non- Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR Section 180.135. “Covered transactions” include nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220s. All nonprocurement transactions (i.e. subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless listed in the exemptions in 2 CFR § 180.215.When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by: (1) checking the System for Award Management (Sam.gov), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR 180.300). For one contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the County used the noncompetitive proposals method however, none of the four required circumstances applied. The County did not have the proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered into covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. Due to the deficient internal control structure, the required verification was not completed for 22 out of 27 covered transactions in the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds during Fiscal Year 2023. These covered transactions had a payment to a vendor of equal or greater than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. Failing to have the appropriate internal controls in place may result in procurement requirements not being met and suspended or debarred vendors receiving federal funds. The County should implement procedures to ensure federal procurement requirements are being met. Prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds, the County should verify the vendor is not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor.
Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Conservation and Rehabilitation of Natural Resources on Military Installations Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI083313 - 2020 Award Period: September 28, 2020, through September 27, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 requires non-federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures. 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that "the non-Federal entity must maintain record sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price". In addition, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states that "... If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity". Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.320(b) states that "When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.". Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the Organization was not performing suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into vendor contracts to ensure the vendor was not listed in the suspended or debarred database maintained by the General Services Administration. In addition, the Organization does not have an established procurement policy nor procedures in place at the time of the audit in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs: None. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Context: For procurement, a sample of 8 was made from a population of 30 procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded $3,000 (the Organization's procurement policy after 2023 and below the minimum micro-purchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with a written established policy). Of the 8 sampled procurement selections, three did not retain an adequate number of price comparisons prior to exercising the procurement, four did not follow the formal procurement methods for proposals when required, and all lacked evidence of controls over procurement considerations. For suspension and debarment, a sample of 3 was made from a population of 3 (entire population) suspension and debarment transactions charged to the major program. Of the 3 sampled, all were not checked for suspension or debarment prior to entering into the transaction. Cause: Prior to completing the prior year’s audit, staff were not aware of the specific compliance requirements and procedures for procurement, suspension, and debarment status. Effect: Purchases may occur that do not follow the procurement, suspension and debarment standards as required by Uniform Guidance, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the immediate prior year. Prior year finding number was 2022-002. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization ensure its current process to review potential contractors for suspension and debarment is taking place prior to entering into transactions with such entities. The Organization has already taken steps to address considerations around procurement by implementing a Procurement Approval form. CLA recommends the use of this form, including signature, and emphasizes the importance of retaining adequate price rate quotations, RFP documentation, sole-source evidence, and price analyses in accordance with their established thresholds. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
FINDING 2023-004 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2022 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (Continued) Finding 2023-003 (Continued) (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for projects exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • Written standards for solicitations requiring a formal bid process • Written standards to rationalize limited competition purchases • Written standards to maintain historical documentation of the procurement process Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The City entered into three contracts funded by the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) grant during the audit period. Two of those contracts were selected for testing and the City was unable to provide any procurement history. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verified the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. There were $237,044 in expenditures incurred on the contracts tested in the current fiscal year. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-002 Information on the federal program: Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listing Number: 10.760 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The Town contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for projects exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 nor did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was no available history of the procurement process. Cause: The Town’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the Town does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The Town’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • Written standards for solicitations requiring a formal bid process • Written standards to rationalize limited competition purchases • Written standards to maintain historical documentation of the procurement process Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Town at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The Town entered into three contracts funded by the Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities (WWTP) grant during the audit period. Two of those contracts were selected for testing. For one of those contracts selected for testing, the Town was unable to provide any procurement history. There were $459,737 in expenditures incurred on the contract tested with exceptions in the current fiscal year. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 65851, CY2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for a project exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • No formal written or documented City policy or ordinance regarding the City’s procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the procurement contract testing, the City was unable to provide any procurement history for a selected vendor contract funded through the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds grant. The City had entered into the vendor contract based on previous experience with the vendor. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verify the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Identification as a repeat finding: See Finding 2022-001 Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2023-001 Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 65851, CY2021 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR section 200.318 states in part: (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders… (h) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR section 200.320 states in part: (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate:… (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: The City contracted a vendor utilizing federal funds without performing a formal bid process for a project exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 no did the City provide documentation supporting a noncompetitive procurement. There was available history of the procurement process, including a lack of documented City Council approval for the contract. The contract entered into also did not include the required Buy America Build America Provisions. Cause: The City’s management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Also, the City does not have written Procurement Policies that comply with the Federal Uniform Guidance requirements for non-Federal entities. The City’s current policy does not address the following requirements: • Written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting. • Written standards for solicitations to foster full and open competition. • Micro-purchase threshold of $10,000 (listed at $25k) • No formal written or documented City policy or ordinance regarding the City’s procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the City at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During the procurement contract testing, the City was unable to provide any procurement history for a selected vendor contract funded through the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds grant. The City had entered into the vendor contract based on previous experience with the vendor. Upon inquiry of the City on their purchasing policies and procedures, it was verify the City does not have procurement policies for purchases that conform to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Identification as a repeat finding: See Finding 2022-001 Recommendation: We recommend that management of the City establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement procurement policies and procedures that adheres of the procurement requirements for purchases with federal awards as required by the 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2 CFR 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for 2 CFR 200.320 that states that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of 2 CFR Sections 200.320, 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2) states that "small purchases are the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity." During testing of the 2023 AL # 21.027 Covid 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, procurements from a vendor exceeded the micro-purchase threshold but did not exceed the Simplified Acquisition threshold, and the Village could not provide documentation supporting that they obtained price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Failure to adhere to the requirements of 2 CFR 200.320 could result in unallowable purchases, misuse of public funds, or Federal funding being used for purchases which are not subject to free and open competition. The Village should ensure they are following the appropriate Federal procurement methods when purchases fall within the small purchase threshold.
Criterial or Specific Requirement: Nonfederal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The organization did not document procurements consistent with the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. Cause: There are no formally approved written policies and procedures for procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: The cost of the procurements may be disallowed. Recommendation: The organization should become familiar with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and establish written policies and procedures for procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of finalizing written policies and procedures for procurement.
Criterial or Specific Requirement: Nonfederal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The organization did not document procurements consistent with the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. Cause: There are no formally approved written policies and procedures for procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: The cost of the procurements may be disallowed. Recommendation: The organization should become familiar with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and establish written policies and procedures for procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of finalizing written policies and procedures for procurement.
Criterial or Specific Requirement: Nonfederal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The organization did not document procurements consistent with the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. Cause: There are no formally approved written policies and procedures for procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: The cost of the procurements may be disallowed. Recommendation: The organization should become familiar with the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and establish written policies and procedures for procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of finalizing written policies and procedures for procurement.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County received a total COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $73,674,384 and chose to calculate its own revenue loss allowance, which totaled $35,932,557, to use for government services. Some SLFRF program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. Additional program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the other eligible use categories. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For funds expended under the revenue loss eligible use category, the above listed procurement requirements do not apply. During the audit period, the County had four vendors with purchases over the $10,000 micropurchase threshold which were expended under an eligible use category other than revenue loss and, as such, were considered small purchase procurements. The County did not provide competitive price quotations for the small purchase procurements for three of the four vendors, which totaled $257,038. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During the engagement, an employee of the Board of County Commissioners stated that verification was completed by checking the Excluded Parties List System when covered transactions were entered into by the County to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Six covered transactions, totaling $3,952,203, were paid from SLFRF funds to six different vendors for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period. Three of the six covered transactions were selected for testing. For all three transactions tested, documentation was not provided that the vendor's suspension and debarment status was verified. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. In addition, the County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had checked the Excluded Parties List System, per the County's procedures, to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions that exceeded $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot demonstrate it obtained an adequate number of price or rate quotations prior to selecting a vendor. Therefore, the County could have overpaid for the services obtained. Furthermore, without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for small purchase procurements. Additionally, we recommended policies and procedures be strengthened to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained. Lastly, we recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2023-005 – Internal Control Deficiency and Noncompliance Over Procurement Identification of the federal program: Federal grantor: United States Department of Health and Human Services Assistance listing no.: 93.048 Program name: Special Programs for the Aging, Title IV, and Title II, Discretionary Projects Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ‘Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government’ issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework,’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318(i) – General procurement standards states: “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states: ”The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurements procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded.” Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart C, 200.214 – Suspension and debarment states: “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations that restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” Condition: AdviseWell, Inc. did not have internal controls in place throughout the audit period to sufficiently document the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price or sole source justification if warranted. Additionally, management did not have evidence of internal controls being in place throughout the audit period to document that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a procurement transaction. AdviseWell, Inc. did not have or use documented procurements procedures throughout the audit period. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place throughout the audit period over the compliance requirement as stated in the criteria section above. Effect or potential effect: Procurements were not supported by effective internal controls and could potentially include unreasonable prices or missing documentation to support the procurements made. If suspension and debarment searches are not conducted, the organization could contract with vendors that are suspended or debarred. Lack of written policies and procedures is out of compliance with the federal requirements and could lead to disallowed procurements. Questioned costs: $80,082. Questioned costs were determined based on the expenditures of the procurements. Context: For five procurements selected for testing totaling $80,082 out of a total population of procurements of $145,646, required documentation was not available supporting the history of the procurement, including rationale for sole source selection. As the written procurement policy was not in place throughout the year and/or documentation of debarment searches on vendors was not maintained throughout the year, we were unable to test these controls. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding – Finding 2022-004. Recommendation: AdviseWell, Inc. should develop and implement effective internal controls throughout the audit period to ensure procurements are in accordance with the federal guidelines. AdviseWell, Inc. should search for suspension and debarment prior to entering into a procurement transaction and retain documentation that the search was conducted prior to entering into the transaction. AdviseWell, Inc. should periodically search recurring vendors for suspension and debarment and retain documentation to support that the search was conducted. View of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding. A procurement policy was established in October 2023 in accordance with the federal requirements, and documentation for each procurement was retained subsequent to October 2023. Management began retaining documentation that searches were conducted for vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the procurement and on a periodic basis for recurring vendors.
2023-001 (Significant Deficiency): Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.319( c) the District must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: The District does not have a written procurement policy as required by the Uniform Guidance. Context: During the audit it was noted tha.t the District lacked a documented procurement policy. Cause: The District did not have an adequate procurement policy Questioned Costs: None Effect: An important component of internal controls and compliance is the existence of operating policies and procedures. Without those, there is a higher risk of noncompliance with program requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should determine the scope of written policies and procedures to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials (unaudited): Management agrees with the findings and recommendation. The District will update its policies and procedures to ensure they meet the Uniform Guidance Requirements.
ALN Title and Number COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, AL #21.027 Federal Award Number and Year 2023 Federal Agency United States Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity Ohio Department of Public Safety Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Finding Number (if repeat) N/A Finding 2023-004 – Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Cost Principals and Suspension and Debarment 2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
ALN Title and Number COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, AL #21.027 Federal Award Number and Year 2023 Federal Agency United States Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity Ohio Department of Public Safety Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Finding Number (if repeat) N/A Finding 2023-004 – Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Cost Principals and Suspension and Debarment 2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
ALN Title and Number COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, AL #21.027 Federal Award Number and Year 2023 Federal Agency United States Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity Ohio Department of Public Safety Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Finding Number (if repeat) N/A Finding 2023-004 – Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Cost Principals and Suspension and Debarment 2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
ALN Title and Number COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, AL #21.027 Federal Award Number and Year 2023 Federal Agency United States Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity Ohio Department of Public Safety Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Finding Number (if repeat) N/A Finding 2023-004 – Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Allowable Costs/Cost Principals and Suspension and Debarment 2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
2023-004 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Year of Finding Origination: 2023 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: SLFRP1274, 2021 Pass-Through Agency: N/A – Federal Direct Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318(i) states that the County must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Additionally, the County must follow further federal guidance over full and open competition as provided in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.319, and perform a cost or price analysis as provided in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.324. Federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. Condition: For two procurements tested above the micro-purchase threshold, documentation of the history of the procurement, providing full and open competition, and a cost or price analysis was not available. For the one covered transaction tested, the verification for suspended or debarred vendors was not performed before entering into the covered transaction. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Two of five contracts were tested for compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, one covered transaction was subject to suspension and debarment. The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: It cannot be determined that the contracting process was open and fair because the County did not document the rationale for the contractor selection. It also cannot be determined that an entity was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from conducting business with the County. Cause: The County did not maintain the necessary documentation to allow the auditor to test for procurement and suspension and debarment. Recommendation: We recommend the County maintain documentation on the history of a procurement, provide for full and open competition, and perform a cost or price analysis to support compliance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations §§ 200.318, 200.319, and 200.324. We further recommend the County maintain documentation to demonstrate that vendors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from conducting business with the County; this documentation should be completed prior to entering into a covered transaction. View of Responsible Official: Concur
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Information on the federal program – All federal programs Criteria or specific requirement – According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition – During the 2022 audit, the predecessor auditor determined that the Organization did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. The matter has not been resolved in 2023. Cause – Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or potential effect – Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Organization's internal procurement policy. Questioned costs – None Context – The predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the predecessor auditor noted that several items selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Is a repeat finding (2022-007) Recommendation – We recommend the Organization retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Finding 2023-006: Procurement Information on the Federal Program: 97.024 - Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold, 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined that SAMU did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, we noted that while SAMU does have a procurement policy in place, the policy does not include requirements for re-procuring long-term contracts that continuously re-new. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as SAMU's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: $75,000 Context: 2 of 4 samples selected for testing did not have adequate documentation for the rationale related to the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. The sample is representative of the population. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: 2022-006 Recommendation: We recommend SAMU retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.
Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by COSO. Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.320, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §200.318 and §200.319. Condition: During the testing of the procurement compliance requirement related to the major programs, it was determined that ATS did not have a documented procurement policy in place for procurement of property or services required under a Federal award. Cause: Management did not have internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately followed, documented and retained when Federal awards were obtained. Effect: Failure to have and use documented procurement policies and procedures could have resulted in noncompliance with the Criteria or Specific Requirements section above. Perspective: While ATS did not have documented procurement policies and procedures compliant with 2 CFR §200.320, ATS did establish a documented selection criteria policy for contractors under its Federal program. With this policy ATS created a selection subcommittee to review, evaluate and select contractors. The subcommittee evaluated the applications received and chose the contractors based on several selection criteria. Each contractor’s application was sent for review and approval by prime awardee. Within a random sample of 4 procurement contracts, 4 were selected based on the selection criteria policy established. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: ATS should update its procurement policy to include requirements for procurement of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance.
Uniform Guidance requires written policies for the requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2), 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2), and 2 CFR 200.319(d). The Village does not have written policies in place for the requirements outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations sections referenced above.
2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
2 CFR 200 outlines the following policies required for a County spending Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles; • 2 CFR 200.430 for allowability of compensation costs; 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) for reimbursement of relocation costs; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) for employee conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.318(c)(2) for organizational conflicts of interest; • 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) for selection and awarding of contracts for competitive proposals; • 2 CFR 200.319(d) for minimum evaluation criteria for bids and proposals. During testing we noted that the County did not have sufficient written policies addressing the above requirements. Failure to adopt and implement policies could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. We recommend the County approve and implement the above policies to ensure compliance with federal requirements.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027 U.S. Department of the Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year MH 1251 2023 Pass through Entity The Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services Finding Type Significant deficiency Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.320, an entity must have written procurement procedures that address the procurement methods outlined throughout 2 CFR 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. Condition Controls in place were not adequate to ensure the policy included appropriate procurement thresholds and methods. Questioned Costs N/A If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Context ProMedica did not include all requirements outlined throughout 2 CFR 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320 for procurement methods in their written policy. Cause and Effect ProMedica has written procurement procedures in place, however these policies did not include all requirements outlined throughout 2 CFR 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. This lack of controls could lead to noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance requirement to have written policies. Recommendation Management should implement controls to ensure all procurement policies align with the guidance in 2 CFR 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management understands the importance of adhering to procurement thresholds and methods. Procurement policies and grant policies will be updated to include federal thresholds and methods to reflect federal Uniform Guidance.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listings Number: 66.468 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): DW23150901 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the City to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement - Policy The City had not established a purchasing policy that reflected applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Additionally, the City did not maintain a policy that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in evaluation of bids or proposals. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement - Small Purchases The City expended federal funds to pay 12 separate vendors to provide goods and services for the duration of the City's Lead Service Line Replacement project. A population of 5 vendors had aggregated expenditures for the audit period that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. All 5 vendors were tested; for 2 of the 5 vendors, the City was unable to provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurement provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with award funds, recipients are required to verify that vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the agreement with the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA), the City was not required to perform testing over suspension and debarment for a majority of the vendors used; however, several drawdowns from the State Revolving Funds (SRF) program were used to reimburse the City for payments made to specific vendors. The vendors paid directly by the City were not included in the IFA's procedures for checking suspension and debarment, therefore, the City was obligated to meet the requirement. The City did not maintain a set of procedures for checking suspension and debarment status of vendors for expenditures related to the SRF awards. A total of two vendors paid directly by the City exceeded the suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000 and were subject to testing. No documentation to show that suspension and debarment was verified prior to entering into the contract could be provided for either vendor. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318(d) states: "The non-Federal entity's procedures must avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. Where appropriate, an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives, and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical approach." 2 CFR 200.319(c) states: "The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to compete for the contract." 2 CFR 200.319(d) states: "The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a 'brand name or equivalent' description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and (2) Identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals." Cause The City did not maintain a procurement policy that would demonstrate the appropriate procedures to be followed when procuring with federal funding and were not aware of the need to follow federal guidelines for procurement or suspension and debarment for expenditures associated with the SRF awards. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, noncompliance remained undetected. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Without following the required methods for procurement, the City could be overpaying for services or providing federal funds to an entity that is suspended or debarred. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the City. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award and ensure that vendors paid from federal funds are neither suspended nor debarred. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
2023-002 – Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Program: ALN# 47.070 = Computer and Information Science and Engineering Federal Agency: National Science Foundation Federal Award Identification Number(s): 2216614, 2122756 Period: Year Ended December 31, 2023 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.319, and 2 CFR 200.320, non-federal entities must maintain written procurement policies and internal controls to ensure compliance with Federal requirements, including suspension and debarment checks. Under 2 CFR 200.214, non-federal entities must not enter into contracts with parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: During our review of procurement policies, we noted that the Organization did not have written procedures addressing procurement suspension and debarment requirements and the Organization was unable to furnish documentation that procurement, suspension, and debarment procedures took place for all contracts selected for testing. Cause: The Organization has not developed formal written procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and procedures. Effect: Without written polices and procedures, the Organization is at increased risk of: • Failing to verify vendor eligibility. • Contracting with suspended or debarred entities. • Procurements conducted in a manner that fails to provide full and open competition. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs identified. Context: This sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization: • Develop and implement written procurement policies that clearly outline procedures for suspension and debarment verification. • Require and document evidence of compliance for all covered procurement transactions • Train staff on the updated procedures. • Periodically review procurement files to ensure consistent adherence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management corrective action plan attached.
Information on the Federal Program(s): 10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities, Department of Agriculture Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.319(d) requires that the non-Federal entity must maintain written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: We noted that the City did not have written procedures for procurement transactions that include the provisions required by the Procurement Standards 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.327 in fiscal year 2023. Cause: The City was not aware of the requirement to have written procedures for procurement transactions. Effect: Failure to have adequate written procedures for procurement transactions could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, other procurement requirements, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the City identify grants that are subject to Uniform Guidance on a timely basis to ensure all compliance requirements are met and develop adequate written policies and procedures for procurement transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The City has identified federal grants subject to the Uniform Guidance and will develop written policies and procedures which include the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR §200.318-326, non-federal entities must adhere to procurement standards for purchases made with federal funds. Key requirements include: - Full and Open Competition: Procurement transactions must be conducted to ensure open competition and prevent practices that may unduly restrict competition (2 CFR §200.319(a)). - Documentation of Procurement History: Entities must maintain records that detail the procurement history, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR §200.318(i)). -Use of Non-Competitive Procurement: Non-competitive procurement is only allowed under limited circumstances, such as when the item is available from a single source, there is a public emergency, or after solicitation of multiple sources, competition is deemed inadequate (2 CFR §200.320(c)). Condition: During 2023, the organization incurred expenditures of approximately $16.5 million for the acquisition renovation of motels into permanent housing using federal funds under the SLFRF program. However: - No documentation was available to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement standards, including the contractor solicitation process, selection method, or the basis for the contract price. - It is unclear whether the contractor was selected through a competitive process, or if justification for non-competitive procurement was appropriately documented as required by 2 CFR §200.320(c). - Contractor costs totaled approximately $16.5 million expended during the year. Additionally, the organization also did not maintain documentation for vendors used in its Emergency Solutions Grant Program sites. These vendors consisted primarily of food providers and security services. During the course of our audit, we learned that one catering vendor utilized by the organization was owned by an employee who was also involved in authorizing payments to the vendor. Cause: The organization did not establish or follow sufficient internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements, including maintaining the required documentation for procurement activities.Possible effect: The lack of procurement documentation creates a significant risk that noncompliant practices occurred, such as non-competitive procurement or payments exceeding fair market value. Questioned cost: $1,318,527 related to the catering vendor Recommendation: Implement comprehensive procurement policies and procedures that comply with federal regulations under 2 CFR §200.318-326. Ensure all procurement transactions are documented, including evidence of competitive bidding or justification for non-competitive procurement under 2 CFR §200.320(c). Conduct staff training on procurement standards for federal awards, focusing on documentation, competition, and conflict of interest requirements. Perform periodic internal reviews to confirm compliance with procurement policies. Consult with California's HCD regarding their expectations of contractor selection policies for the HomeKey program. Views of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this finding, which occurred during a period of rapid program expansion when procurement infrastructure had not yet been fully developed. Since the audit period, we have completely overhauled our procurement process to ensure full compliance with the Federal procurement standards. We have implemented a formal procurement policy, created a dedicated Procurement sub-department within Finance, hired a Procurement Supervisor and support team, and launched a new procurement software platform to ensure proper solicitation, documentation, approval routing, and record retention for all Federally funded programs. These upgrades establish consistent competitive bidding, justification procedures, conflict-of-interest safeguards, and transparent procurement. In addition, we have strengthened oversight, provided staff training on Federal procurement standards, and embedded monitoring practices to ensure ongoing compliance. Management is confident these substantial structural improvements have significantly reduced the risk of noncompliance and positioned the organization for full alignment with federal procurement standards going forward.
Finding 2023-003 Procurement - Significant Deficiency Program name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing: 11.473 Federal award Identification number: 20 NFWF 339630 Federal award year: 9/1/2020 - 9/30/2024 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Commerce Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.318 (i), recipients and subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement. These records must include: rationale for the method of procurement; selection of contract type; contractor selection or rejection, and; basis for the contract price. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318(a) requires entities to maintain and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with applicable laws and regulations. Condition - The Organization has a written procurement policy in place; however, it was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that procurement transactions during the audit period were conducted in accordance with that policy. Specifically, the auditee did not retain records detailing the procurement method used, contractor selection rationale, or price justification for sampled transactions. Cause - The Organization did not maintain or consistently apply documentation protocols for internal control reviews. Formal documentation practices were not in place during the audit period. Effect - Without sufficient documentation, the auditee cannot demonstrate compliance with Federal procurement standards. This increases the risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements and may result in unallowable costs or questioned costs. Questioned costs - None identified. Perspective - The deficiency was pervasive across multiple procurement transactions. Identification of Repeat Findings - This is a repeat finding from the prior year (Finding 2022-003). As a result of the 2022 audit report, issued in October 2025, the Organization began the process of developing updated policies for compliance. In 2025, the Organization formally adopted a new procurement policy as well as procedures to ensure proper documentation will be maintained. Recommendation - We recommend that the Organization strengthen its internal controls over procurement by: Ensuring all procurement transactions are documented in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319(i). Training staff on documentation requirements. Periodically reviewing procurement files for completeness and compliance. Management response - Management agrees with this assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan. Management has also engaged with a new accounting firm to oversee the financial reporting functions at the Organization.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.