FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and the Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. The informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of sources for all three vendors that were tested that met the small purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that vendor. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without a proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transaction of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY22-23, FY23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and the Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for goods or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is customarily set at $250,000. However, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000 or less for when small purchase procedures may be used. The informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations were obtained for all small purchases. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of sources for all three vendors that were tested that met the small purchase threshold. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that vendor. The School Corporation did not have effective controls in place to ensure that the verification was completed for all contractors prior to entering into covered transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure documentation was obtained and retained to demonstrate they had properly procured all small purchases. Management had not established a system of internal controls to ensure that the School Corporation's procedures for verifying a contractor's suspension and debarment status was followed for all contractors. Effect Without a proper design or implementation of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. This could result in the School Corporation overpaying for goods or services or paying a contractor who has been suspended or debarred, which would be unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for all small purchases and that suspension and debarment is verified for all covered transaction of $25,000 or more. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: 2023/2024 Pass Through Entity: Chicago Cook Workforce Partnership Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Organization is either lacking or has nonconforming written policies and procedures for the following administrative functions, required by0 the Uniform Guidance: 1. Financial management - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) - spacing 2. Allowable Costs - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) 3. Federal payment - 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) 4. Procurement - 2 CFR 200.318(a) and 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) 5. Competition - 2 CFR 200.319(d) 6. Methods of procurement to be followed - 2 CFR 200.320 7. Compensation (Personal Services) - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(1) 8. Compensation (Fringe Benefits - Leave) - 2 CFR 200.431(b)(1) 9. Relocation costs of employees - 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) 10. Travel costs - 2 CFR 200.474 Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to the items described above. Context: The conditions outlined above are based on our review of the Organization’s policies and procedures, which were found to be not in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance requirements for certain written policies and procedures. Effect: The Organization did not have these policies and procedures in place to reasonably ensure that program functions are achieved effectively, efficiently and in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The Organization was not in compliance with the administrative requirements set forth in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization design procedures and implement internal control procedures to ensure that the Uniform Guidance administrative requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: See corrective action plan attached to financial statements.
2024-002 – Material Weakness in Compliance and Internal Control over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Identification of federal programs: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: #14.251 Economic Development Initiative, Community Project Funding, and Misc. Grants, #B-22-CP-AK-0003 Criteria: Part 3 Compliance Supplement Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327. § 200.318(a) Documented procurement procedures – The recipient must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including for acquisition of property or services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. § 200.318(i) Procurement records - The recipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. § 200.320 Procurement methods – There are three types of procurement methods described: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. § 200.214 Suspension and debarment – When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Organization procured certain goods or services from vendors but did not maintain evidence that they followed their procurement policy or the procurement requirements of the federal program. Cause: The Organization’s purchasing policy does not address all of the procurement requirements of Uniform Guidance. The Organization did not maintain sufficient documentation supporting purchases greater than the micro-purchase threshold or relating to suspension and debarment on certain covered transactions. In the period after year end and before the date of fieldwork, there was turnover in management in the Executive Director position so it is possible that competitive bidding was sought, but that the knowledge and communications have been lost during the transition. Effect or potential effect: The Organization is not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Context: During the course of the audit of the major program, auditors requested copies of the required support for purchases from three vendors. Support was provided for one of the purchases but could not be located for two of the purchases. Identification of Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendations: We recommend that the Organization reviews and revises their procurement policies and procedures to ensure that they align with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. We also recommend that as part of the Organization’s internal control structure over compliance with procurement requirements, to establish monitoring procedures or checklists to ensure that support is obtained from a sufficient number of qualified sources depending on the purchasing threshold and method required to be used, and that evidence is retained to show that vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into a transaction with them. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a competitive procurement process or documentation to support the rationale to limit competition. Cause: The District relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $80,139 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a competitive procurement process or documentation to support the rationale to limit competition. Cause: The District relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $80,139 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a competitive procurement process or documentation to support the rationale to limit competition. Cause: The District relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $80,139 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Three vendors were awarded a contract without a competitive procurement process or documentation to support the rationale to limit competition. Cause: The District relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $80,139 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The District should implement procedures to perform procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Agriculture Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities – ALN 10.760 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: The Town was unable to provide documentation to support a competitive procurement process for one vendor. Cause: The Town had a significant amount of turnover in managerial positions and procurement documentation was not filed in an organized manner. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $243,488 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to ensure that all procurement actions are properly documented in the Town’s contract files. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Under 2 CFR 200.318-326, non-federal entities must adhere to procurement standards for purchases made with federal funds. Key requirements include: - Full and Open Competition: Procurement transactions must be conducted to ensure open competition and prevent practices that may unduly restrict competition (2 CFR 200.319(a)). - Documentation of Procurement History: Entities must maintain records that detail the procurement history, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (2 CFR 200.318(i)). - Use of Non-Competitive Procurement: Non-competitive procurement is only allowed under limited circumstances, such as when the item is available from a single source, there is a public emergency, or after solicitation of multiple sources, competition is deemed inadequate (2 CFR 200.320(c)).The Organization incurred expenditures of approximately $620,000 for the renovation of a community center using federal funds under the SLFRF program. The Organization received two bids for the renovation project. However, full documentation of the process was not maintained. Cause: The Organization did not establish or follow sufficient internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements, including maintaining the required documentation for procurement activities. Possible effect: The lack of procurement documentation creates a significant risk that noncompliant practices occurred, such as non-competitive procurement or payments exceeding fair market value.
2024-001 U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through the County of Plymouth, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: One vendor was awarded four contracts without a competitive procurement process. Cause: The Town relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $509,016 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to perform competitive procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through the County of Plymouth, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: One vendor was awarded four contracts without a competitive procurement process. Cause: The Town relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to Federal procurements. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $509,016 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should implement procedures to perform competitive procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Program Name: Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Assistance Listing Number: 20.509 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2024; FAIN not available. Pass-Through Agency: State of Vermont Agency of Transportation Pass-Through Number(s): EA#COVIDFTA-934 EA#FT202201-704 EA#FT24FLEX-454 EA#CRRSAA22-934 EA#FT23FLEX-064 EA#FT24FLEX-554 EA#FT201806-454 EA#FT23FLEX-454 EA#FT24FLEX-854 EA#FT201806-554 EA#FT23FLEX-554 EA#FT24FLEX-954 EA#FT201806-954 EA#FT23FLEX-954 EA#FT24FORM-454 EA#FT201903-704 EA#FT23FORM-064 EA#FT24FORM-924 EA#FT202104-704 EA#FT23FORM-934 EA#FT24FORM-934 EA#FT202104-954 EA#FT24FLEX-064 Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material weakness in internal control over compliance and material noncompliance (modified opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: The United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.319 indicates procurement transactions under the Federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200.320 indicates that for any allowable method chosen, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart D. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR Part 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA), (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR Part 180.300). 2 CFR Part 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: For a sample of five (5) procurement transactions above the micro-purchase threshold, documentation was not maintained to support the procurement, suspension and debarment procedures performed in order to demonstrate compliance with 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Questioned costs: Unknown. Context: Five of five transactions selected for testing in our sample. Cause: Procedures were not designed or implemented to maintain documentation to support compliance with the standards of procurement, suspension and debarment contained in 2 CFR Part 180 and 2 CFR Part 200. Effect: Compliance with the requirements of the federal award could not be demonstrated. Additionally, the lack of internal controls presents additional risk of noncompliance in circumstances where federal expenditures are made to ineligible entities. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management enhance procedures and controls to ensure documentation is maintained to support all procurements and suspension and debarment verifications related to expenditures from federal award programs. Justification for noncompetitive procurements (i.e., sole source, public exigency, or consent of the awarding agency), should also be documented. Such documentation should be consolidated and maintained in a secure, accessible location. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
2 CFR § 3474.1 provides the Department of Education (DOE) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this section gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the DOE, except as otherwise noted in that section. 2 CFR § 200.320(b) states in part that when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. 2 CFR § 200.318(e) states to foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal Government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. Competition requirements will be met with documented procurement actions using strategic sourcing, shared services, and other similar procurement arrangements. 2 CFR §200.320(2)(a) states for small purchases the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081, states that a regional council may enter into a unit price contract for materials, labor, services, overhead, profit, and associated expenses for the repair, enlargement, improvement, or demolition of a building or structure if the contract is awarded pursuant to a competitive bidding procedure of a county, municipal corporation, or township or a special district, school district, or other political subdivision that is a council member. A political subdivision that is a member of a regional council may participate in a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. Purchases under a contract entered into under Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081 are exempt from any competitive selection or bidding requirements otherwise required by law. Furthermore, the District’s Procurement – Federal Grants/Funds Policy (#6325) details the District’s procedures for procurement with federal funds. Specifically, Maintenance of Procurement Records: The District shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of all procurements. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price (including a cost or price analysis). The District participated in The Ohio Purchasing Council’s unit price contract with Prodigy Building Solutions, LLC., for the School District's roofing, HVAC, and Lighting project, pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 167.081. The School District utilized ESSER grant funds for parts of these projects. The School District did not maintain documentation that Ohio Purchasing Council followed competitive bidding procedures of a council member pursuant to O.R.C. 167.081 when awarding the unit price contract to Prodigy Building Solutions respectively, failing to meet the documentation requirements of 2 CFR § 200.320(b) and 2 CFR § 200.318(e) noted above. Failure to comply with the applicable Uniform Guidance Requirements and the Ohio Revised Code could result in misuse of public funds, potential questioned costs, and/or potential loss of grant funding. The District should review its policy, Uniform Guidance requirements, and the Ohio Revised Code before entering into any contracts that require competitive bidding. In addition, the District should fully implement its procurement policy.
Lack of Adherence to Procurement Policy Department of Treasury COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing No. – 21.027 Compliance Requirement – Procurement Criteria: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.319, procurement methods are required to promote full and open competition, with appropriate records maintained to justify procurement decisions. Condition: The County failed to adhere to established procurement policies in place during the acquisition of goods and services under federally funded programs. Multiple transactions lacked required documentation, such as documentation of three quotes obtained or requests for bids. Cause: Expenditures were not routed through the procurement department due to insufficient coordination between departments. Decentralized processes allowed individual departments to make purchases independently, bypassing established procedures. Effect: Non-compliance with procurement policies increases the risk of improper expenditures and may result in repayment obligations to the grantor agency. Recommendation: Properly follow existing procurement policies in place, including mandatory documentation of quotes and requests for bids. Provide staff training on federal procurement requirements and establish periodic internal audits to ensure compliance. View of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07 Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction. Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment. Questioned Costs $ 237,890 If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA. Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027, U.S. Department of the Treasury, COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.493, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Congressional Directives Federal Award Identification Number and Year 21.027 192908 and 93.493 6 CE2CS52794 01 07 Pass through Entity 21.027 Chicago Department of Public Health; 93.493 N/A Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.319(a) All procurement transactions under the federal award must be conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition and is consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320(b) covering formal procurement methods. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Finally, per 2 CFR 180.300, nonfederal entities must verify that outside parties are not suspended or debarred from engaging in federal activity before entering into a covered transaction. Condition Controls were not sufficient to ensure procurement activities were performed in accordance with 2 CFR 200 and management’s internal policies and procedures related to procurement, suspension, and debarment. Questioned Costs $ 237,890 If Questioned Costs are not Determinable, Description of why Known Questioned Costs Were Undetermined or Otherwise Could not be Reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent expenditures under these contracts reported on the SEFA. Context For three contracts in excess of the Organization's formal procurement threshold ($50,000), management did not retain documentation of having obtained the required number of competitive bids or document rationale for sole procurement, did not document the history of procurement decisions, and was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Cause and Effect A lack of controls to ensure required procurement activities were performed could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation We recommend that management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. Additionally, we recommend management review its internal procurement policy regularly to ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Careful consideration was done in selecting the vendors to look at obtaining the best cost for the value of the service as IWS was responsible for a portion of the expenses. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement processes and controls in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Finding No. 2024-004 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRFP4547 – 2021 Award Period: 3/3/21 – 12/31/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Town must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). UG §200.318 General procurement standards. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. §200.320 states that the non-Federal entity must use one of the prescribed methods of procurement. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in §200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: (1) Micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in §200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. (2) Small purchase. Procurement by small purchase is the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a noncompetitive procurement can be used in accordance with §200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. Bids are publicly solicited, and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. Either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the allowed circumstances apply. Condition: The Town purchasing policy does not include all elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 noted above. Questioned Costs: None Context: Although the Town’s purchasing policies do not include all elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326, we did not identify transactions where contracts were awarded without proper justification in 7 of 7 procurement transactions tested. Cause: Management was not aware of the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Town is at risk for noncompliance with Federal grants as it relates to procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town update its procurement policies to include all elements identified in 2 CFR sections 200.303 and 200.318 through 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is working with our current auditors to update the Town’s procurement policies to be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance.
2024-009 – Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through State of Connecticut Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 Program Name: School Breakfast Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Program Name: National School Lunch Program Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200.320, “There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319.” 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Town did not have documentation to support they complied with their purchasing policy or Uniform Guidance procurement requirements for three out of six selections. The Town did not have documentation to support it verified four vendors were not suspended or debarred for 4 out of 4 selections. Cause: Due to significant staff turnover within the Greenwich Public Schools finance function during the audit period, established controls related to procurement were not consistently applied or effectively monitored. Effect: Documentation of the requirement for procurement was not maintained. Questioned costs: $119,367 Context: See condition above. Identification as a repeat finding is applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Town develop and implement a comprehensive plan to address key personnel turnover. This plan should include clearly documented policies and procedures and appropriate cross-training to ensure continuity of operations and maintain adequate internal controls and retention of records. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. See corrective action plan.
2024-009 – Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through State of Connecticut Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553 Program Name: School Breakfast Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.555 Program Name: National School Lunch Program Criteria: Per 2 CFR Part 200.320, “There are three types of procurement methods described in this section: informal procurement methods (for micro-purchases and simplified acquisitions); formal procurement methods (through sealed bids or proposals); and noncompetitive procurement methods. For any of these methods, the recipient or subrecipient must maintain and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319.” 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Town did not have documentation to support they complied with their purchasing policy or Uniform Guidance procurement requirements for three out of six selections. The Town did not have documentation to support it verified four vendors were not suspended or debarred for 4 out of 4 selections. Cause: Due to significant staff turnover within the Greenwich Public Schools finance function during the audit period, established controls related to procurement were not consistently applied or effectively monitored. Effect: Documentation of the requirement for procurement was not maintained. Questioned costs: $119,367 Context: See condition above. Identification as a repeat finding is applicable: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Town develop and implement a comprehensive plan to address key personnel turnover. This plan should include clearly documented policies and procedures and appropriate cross-training to ensure continuity of operations and maintain adequate internal controls and retention of records. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Prior Year Finding: 2023-004 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: COVID 19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Relief Fund Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development Pass-Through Award Number and Period: (7/1/2023 6/30/2024) Compliance Requirement: Procurement Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Criteria or Specific Requirement: Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Compliance: Per 2 CFR section 200.318, a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. Per 2 CFR section 200.319, all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. Per the Towns purchasing policy, goods or services costing $10,000 or more must be purchased from the lowest responsive bidder meeting specifications after advertising for bids. Condition/Context: The Town failed to provide documentation supporting compliance with required procurement processes for goods or services exceeding $10,000 for five out of five vendors tested. This includes a lack of evidence on how these vendors were selected and whether the procurement process ensured full and open competition. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Cause: The Town's internal controls were not sufficient to ensure that procurement policies were followed for purchases made for the program. Effect: Failure to adhere to procurement policies and procedures may result in obtaining goods or services under terms that are not in the best interest of the federal program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Town enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it verifies vendors are not suspended or debarred from business prior to all goods and services charged to the program. The Town should retain documentation of procurement suspension/debarment status verifications for its vendors audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Condition: Expenditures for federal programs did not follow the non-federal entities procedures before entering a covered transaction. Two (2) disbursements totaling $28,882 were not properly encumbered in accordance with state statute. Cause of Condition: Policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented to ensure federal expenditures are made in accordance with federal compliance requirements. Effect of Condition: This condition could result in noncompliance to grant requirements and could lead to a loss of federal funds to the County. Recommendation: OSAI recommends the County gain an understanding of the grant requirements for this program and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with these grant requirements. Management Response: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners: I plan to communicate with the Budget Board regarding this finding and have already introduced to the Budget Board, a form guideline called “Payne County Grant Administration Plan” to aid in proper documentation, reporting and proper spending of all grant awards. County Clerk: The Payne County Budget Board has approved and adopted a Federal Funding Checklist as well as Federal Funding guidelines on agreements and awards. The Payne County Clerk’s office also communicates with each department and requests that they report to our office any Federal Grants and Awards they receive and report those on their SEFA annually to our office. We also communicate with the Treasurer’s office and request to know when any Federal money has been received. Criteria: Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (8. Procurement, Suspension & Debarment.) reads as follows: Recipients are responsible for ensuring that any procurement using SLFRF funds, or payments under procurement contracts using such funds, are consistent with the procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327, unless stated otherwise by Treasury. As outlined in FAQ 13.15, only a subset of the Uniform Guidance requirements at 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D (Post Federal AwardRequirements) applies to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The procurement standards set forth in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CRF 200.317 through 2 CRF 200.327 are not included in FAQ 13.15’s list of applicable Subpart D requirements that apply to recipients’ use of funds in the revenue loss eligible use category. The Uniform Guidance establishes in 2 CFR 200.319 that all procurement transactions for property or services must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, consistent with standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.320, which allows for non-competitive procurements only in certain circumstances. Recipients must have and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with the standards outlined in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.320. In addition, the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.214, 2 CFR Part 180, and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR Part 19, prohibit recipients from entering into contracts with suspended or debarred parties. The procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance require an infrastructure for competitive bidding and contractor oversight, including maintaining written standards of conduct. Your organization must ensure adherence to all applicable local, State, and federal procurement laws and regulations. Further, 2 CFR § 200.319 Competition (d) reads as follows: The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions.
2024-001 U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through Norfolk County, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance Finding Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: Two vendors were awarded a contract without a competitive procurement process as a result of relying on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to this Federal award. Cause: The Town did not follow its documented procurement policies and procedures. Effect: The Town is not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: $49,990 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; Finding 2023-002. Recommendation: The Town should review and follow its procurement procedures to ensure that competitive procurement procedures are performed on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553, 10.555 & 10.559 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Per 2 CFR section 200.214, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Condition: The District utilized prices that were competitively procured by French River Collaborative, of which it is a member, and did not obtain individual contracts with the five vendors. Additionally, the District only obtained one of the four required suspension and debarment certifications. Cause: The District did not follow federal award policies and procedures for contract management and suspension and debarment verification when procuring school lunch goods and services. Effect: The District might not obtain the proper negotiated rates that were part of the competitive procurement. The District is at risk of awarding contracts to vendors not eligible to participate in federal awards programs. It was determined that none of the three vendors were suspended or debarred from federal awards. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; Finding 2023-001 Recommendation: The District should obtain individual contracts with vendors that were competitively procured by the Collaborative and require those vendors to attest on suspension and debarment certifications, for all applicable purchases of goods and services. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-001 U.S. Department of the Treasury Passed-through Bristol County, Massachusetts COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – ALN 21.027 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.319, procurements must provide for full and open competition. Condition: The Town’s procurement files did not contain documentation regarding competitive procurement procedures for one contract. The Town, through the Raynham Center Water District, awarded a contract for final design services for two water treatment plants to a vendor that had previously provided preliminary evaluations for the plants, without performing competitive procurement procedures. Context: Procurement was not documented for one of the four contracts selected. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Cause: The Town did not follow its established policy regarding federal procurement as the Town relied on State procurement exemptions which do not apply to this award. Effect: The Town charged $425,000 to the grant award from this contract that did not adhere to federal procurement requirements which could result in unallowable costs. Questioned Costs: Not determined, as the Town has not performed a cost analysis of the contract. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The Town should adhere to its grant award procedures to perform competitive procurement procedures on all applicable contracts for goods and services charged to Federal awards. The Town should also complete a cost analysis to justify the amount charged to the award and adjust costs if necessary. Alternatively, the Town could contact the pass-through agency to re-allocate these expenditures to other properly procured and obligated project expenditures. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Missouri Primary Care Association Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement (2 CFR 200.319 and 2 CFR 200.320) Condition – The Organization’s internal controls over compliance were not sufficient to ensure the appropriate procurement method was utilized based on the value of the procurement transaction or to ensure procurement transactions were conducted in a manner that provided full and open competition. Cause – The Organization did not follow its policy when procuring services during the pre-construction phase of a project later funded by federal grants. Effect or potential effect – A contract for services was entered into during 2022 with estimated fees in excess of the threshold requiring a formal procurement method. The request for proposal did not allow for full and open competition as the Organization did not publicly request proposals or bids and only one proposal was obtained. Services purchased in 2024 under this contract may not have been obtained in the most effective manner. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – A sample of one procurement totaling $336,274 was tested out of a population of three procurements. The sample was not, and is not intended to be, statistically valid. The Organization’s procurement records were insufficient in accordance with the Organization’s procurement policy and Uniform Guidance. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding Recommendation – The Organization should educate employees on its procurement policy, which is compliant with Uniform Guidance. The Organization should also implement additional internal controls, such as the creation of a standard form or template for purchase orders, contracts, requests for proposals/bids, cost/price analyses, bid evaluation, etc., to ensure compliance with its procurement policy and that procurement records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction are maintained. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – This error occurred during fiscal year 2022, when the architect for an upcoming project was chosen. We are in a very rural area, where architects are not easy to come by. For this project, we had decided to utilize a local firm we had a good track record with. We presented it to our board for approval, and it was approved by them at that time so we originally had thought we could justify with having them as a sole source vendor. At the time, the total amount of the project was unknown, and has even changed significantly since that date. However, come to find out, due to the size of the project it should have been bid out. We have revised our procurement policy since this date and have educated all staff on proper procurement procedures.
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Missouri Primary Care Association Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement (2 CFR 200.319 and 2 CFR 200.320) Condition – The Organization’s internal controls over compliance were not sufficient to ensure the appropriate procurement method was utilized based on the value of the procurement transaction or to ensure procurement transactions were conducted in a manner that provided full and open competition. Cause – The Organization did not follow its policy when procuring services during the pre-construction phase of a project later funded by federal grants. Effect or potential effect – A contract for services was entered into during 2022 with estimated fees in excess of the threshold requiring a formal procurement method. The request for proposal did not allow for full and open competition as the Organization did not publicly request proposals or bids and only one proposal was obtained. Services purchased in 2024 under this contract may not have been obtained in the most effective manner. Questioned costs – Unknown Context – A sample of one procurement totaling $336,274 was tested out of a population of three procurements. The sample was not, and is not intended to be, statistically valid. The Organization’s procurement records were insufficient in accordance with the Organization’s procurement policy and Uniform Guidance. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – Not a repeat finding Recommendation – The Organization should educate employees on its procurement policy, which is compliant with Uniform Guidance. The Organization should also implement additional internal controls, such as the creation of a standard form or template for purchase orders, contracts, requests for proposals/bids, cost/price analyses, bid evaluation, etc., to ensure compliance with its procurement policy and that procurement records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction are maintained. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – This error occurred during fiscal year 2022, when the architect for an upcoming project was chosen. We are in a very rural area, where architects are not easy to come by. For this project, we had decided to utilize a local firm we had a good track record with. We presented it to our board for approval, and it was approved by them at that time so we originally had thought we could justify with having them as a sole source vendor. At the time, the total amount of the project was unknown, and has even changed significantly since that date. However, come to find out, due to the size of the project it should have been bid out. We have revised our procurement policy since this date and have educated all staff on proper procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 47.074, National Science Foundation, Biological Sciences - Collaborative Research: Phenobase: Community, Infrastructure, and Data for Global Scale Analyses of Plant Phenology; ALN 47.074, National Science Foundation, Biological Sciences - REU Site: Plant Biology and Conservation Research Experiences for Undergraduates Federal Award Identification Number and Year - DBI-2223510, DBI2149888 Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 180.300 - When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded of disqualified. You do this by: (a) checking SAM exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. 2 CFR 200.318(i) - The entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.319(a) - All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) - If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non Federal entity. Condition - The Society did not have documentation to support that two covered transactions were checked for potential suspension or debarment before entering into the transaction. There was one covered transaction where the Society did not have documentation to support the procurement process followed or that more than one vendor was reviewed for pricing before selecting the vendor chosen. Questioned Costs - The Society charged a total of $31,000 to grant DBI-2223510 during 2023 for a covered transaction in which there was not supporting documentation that the service was procured under the requirements above. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The amount of the covered transaction that was submitted for reimbursement during 2023. Context - Two covered transactions with total expenditures charged to the grants of $85,735 were reviewed. The population subject to testing included a total of three covered transactions. Cause and Effect - The Society experienced significant personnel turnover during the year within its accounting and grants departments, which resulted in issues with documentation retention and records retrieval. Recommendation - The Society should implement an internal review process of its record retention to ensure that all procurement documentation is appropriately retained in accordance with its formal policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Staff turnover in early 2023 resulted in limited capacity for dedicated staff to check for potential suspension or debarment before adding vendors to the system. We have dedicated staff who will be managing this process going forward. The Society has written procurement policies and procedures. Key leadership stakeholders have been apprised of our policies and procedures. The Society will be implementing a training series for government funded procurement stakeholders within the Society to ensure compliance.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 47.074, National Science Foundation, Biological Sciences - Collaborative Research: Phenobase: Community, Infrastructure, and Data for Global Scale Analyses of Plant Phenology; ALN 47.074, National Science Foundation, Biological Sciences - REU Site: Plant Biology and Conservation Research Experiences for Undergraduates Federal Award Identification Number and Year - DBI-2223510, DBI2149888 Pass through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 180.300 - When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded of disqualified. You do this by: (a) checking SAM exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. 2 CFR 200.318(i) - The entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.319(a) - All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and § 200.320. 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) - If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non Federal entity. Condition - The Society did not have documentation to support that two covered transactions were checked for potential suspension or debarment before entering into the transaction. There was one covered transaction where the Society did not have documentation to support the procurement process followed or that more than one vendor was reviewed for pricing before selecting the vendor chosen. Questioned Costs - The Society charged a total of $31,000 to grant DBI-2223510 during 2023 for a covered transaction in which there was not supporting documentation that the service was procured under the requirements above. Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The amount of the covered transaction that was submitted for reimbursement during 2023. Context - Two covered transactions with total expenditures charged to the grants of $85,735 were reviewed. The population subject to testing included a total of three covered transactions. Cause and Effect - The Society experienced significant personnel turnover during the year within its accounting and grants departments, which resulted in issues with documentation retention and records retrieval. Recommendation - The Society should implement an internal review process of its record retention to ensure that all procurement documentation is appropriately retained in accordance with its formal policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Staff turnover in early 2023 resulted in limited capacity for dedicated staff to check for potential suspension or debarment before adding vendors to the system. We have dedicated staff who will be managing this process going forward. The Society has written procurement policies and procedures. Key leadership stakeholders have been apprised of our policies and procedures. The Society will be implementing a training series for government funded procurement stakeholders within the Society to ensure compliance.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement Policy Information on the Federal Program: All Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions." Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: During our testing performed over procurement and through inquiries with management, we noted the Organization does not have a formally documented procurement policy in place that is consistent with 2 CFR §200.318(a). Cause: Management has not formalized and implemented an official organizational procurement policy. Effect or Potential Effect: An official procurement policy will outline specified thresholds for which procurement is required, required documentation needed for each threshold, and individuals responsible for ensuring procurement is performed in all required circumstances. When no policy is in place, there is a risk that procurement would not be performed, or adequate documentation would not be obtained, when required. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: We noted that the Organization does not have a documented procurement policy in effect.Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management formalize and implement an official procurement policy. This policy should include thresholds for which various levels of procurement are required. The policy should also include what documentation is required for each level of procurement. Additionally, the policy should specify individuals responsible for conducting procurement, and approving the final selection.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Defense Federal Cluster: Research and Development (R&D) Pass-Through Entity: The University of Texas Health (93.853, NS119834) Assistance Listing Nos.: 12.420, 93.310, 93.353, 93.393, and 93.853 Award Numbers: W81XWH-15-1-0292 (12.420), OD23121 (93.310), CA246568 (93.353), CA259201 (93.393), NS119834 (93.853), NS122096 (93.853) Award Periods: Various Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Section 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding small purchases: “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Section 200.320(b) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding formal procurement methods to be followed: “When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.” Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” The Clinic procurement justification form for procurements more than $25,000 requires completion of the rationale for the procurement and a search of the federal government’s exclusion list to be performed and documented at the time of the procurement. On a monthly basis, Supply Chain Management performs a review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Condition: Internal Control For five (56%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls, the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the history of the procurement and compliance with Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, was not completed until after the purchase order was created and/or invoice received from the vendor. In addition, for these same five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not timely document its suspension and debarment check at the time of procurement as required by its procurement justification form. In addition, for four (44%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls (two of which relate to the five cited above), the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the procurement transaction’s compliance with policies, procedures and the Uniform Guidance was outdated. Furthermore, the monthly review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures was not operating effectively. Compliance For one (9%) of 11 procurement transactions tested for compliance, the procurement was an add-on purchase related to a larger procurement of the same product under a prior purchase order. The prior procurement was above the simplified acquisition threshold and the Clinic’s competitive bid threshold. The Clinic did not complete a procurement justification form for the add-on purchase (which was a small purchase), and the original procurement did not have adequate support to evidence that it had been competitively bid. As such, adequate documentation did not exist for the procurement in accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 230.320(a)(2)(i) and(b). In addition, for five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Cause: While management has internal controls in place to review procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures and Uniform Guidance CFR 200.320, the review of the procurement justification form is not robust enough to identify errors and there is not a process in place to ensure the form is completed prior to the purchase. Effect or potential effect: The Clinic’s internal controls over procurement were not properly followed during the fiscal year. In addition, the Clinic did not follow the Uniform Guidance requirements related to small purchases and noncompetitive procurements. Questioned costs: $53,482, determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the one procurement transaction that had inadequate support for compliance with CFR 200.320 at the time of procurement, as follows: • Assistance Listing No. 93.310, OD023121 – $53,482 Context: Internal Control We sampled nine federal procurements over $25,000 to test operating effectiveness of internal controls, totaling $962,393, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For seven of the 11 federal procurements tested totaling $770,093, procurement controls were not operating effectively. • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the independent suspension and debarment check to be performed at the time of procurement was not performed until approximately two to eight months later. Compliance We sampled 11 federal procurements over $25,000 to test compliance, totaling $1,736,844, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For one of 11 federal procurements tested totaling $53,482, documentation retained was not adequate to support that the procurement transaction was executed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.320(a)(2)(i) and (b). • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Procurement-related expenditures are approximately 9% of total Federal expenditures for the R&D Cluster of $445,961,340 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat of the finding of the prior year. Recommendation: The Clinic should ensure that all R&D awards that require procurement of goods and services follow established policies, procedures, and internal controls to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and that the procurement justification form is reviewed prior to entering into the purchase transaction. The Clinic should ensure that independent checks for suspension and debarment should be timely completed at the time of procurement in accordance with the Clinic documented policies, procedures, and internal controls. Views of responsible officials: Management will reinforce education and training to the research community and procurement teams regarding the procurement requirements, Justification of Source Selection Checklist/Form, and timely completion of the required documentation. The Clinic utilizes a third party, Visual Compliance, to execute daily supplier sanction and debarment checks for all Mayo Clinic vendors. All third party suspension and debarment match alerts are reviewed and adjudicated as needed. Going forward, the Clinic will supplement this daily review by periodically validating a sample of vendors who are not flagged with an alert by Visual Compliance.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Defense Federal Cluster: Research and Development (R&D) Pass-Through Entity: The University of Texas Health (93.853, NS119834) Assistance Listing Nos.: 12.420, 93.310, 93.353, 93.393, and 93.853 Award Numbers: W81XWH-15-1-0292 (12.420), OD23121 (93.310), CA246568 (93.353), CA259201 (93.393), NS119834 (93.853), NS122096 (93.853) Award Periods: Various Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Section 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding small purchases: “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Section 200.320(b) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding formal procurement methods to be followed: “When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.” Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” The Clinic procurement justification form for procurements more than $25,000 requires completion of the rationale for the procurement and a search of the federal government’s exclusion list to be performed and documented at the time of the procurement. On a monthly basis, Supply Chain Management performs a review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Condition: Internal Control For five (56%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls, the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the history of the procurement and compliance with Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, was not completed until after the purchase order was created and/or invoice received from the vendor. In addition, for these same five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not timely document its suspension and debarment check at the time of procurement as required by its procurement justification form. In addition, for four (44%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls (two of which relate to the five cited above), the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the procurement transaction’s compliance with policies, procedures and the Uniform Guidance was outdated. Furthermore, the monthly review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures was not operating effectively. Compliance For one (9%) of 11 procurement transactions tested for compliance, the procurement was an add-on purchase related to a larger procurement of the same product under a prior purchase order. The prior procurement was above the simplified acquisition threshold and the Clinic’s competitive bid threshold. The Clinic did not complete a procurement justification form for the add-on purchase (which was a small purchase), and the original procurement did not have adequate support to evidence that it had been competitively bid. As such, adequate documentation did not exist for the procurement in accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 230.320(a)(2)(i) and(b). In addition, for five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Cause: While management has internal controls in place to review procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures and Uniform Guidance CFR 200.320, the review of the procurement justification form is not robust enough to identify errors and there is not a process in place to ensure the form is completed prior to the purchase. Effect or potential effect: The Clinic’s internal controls over procurement were not properly followed during the fiscal year. In addition, the Clinic did not follow the Uniform Guidance requirements related to small purchases and noncompetitive procurements. Questioned costs: $53,482, determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the one procurement transaction that had inadequate support for compliance with CFR 200.320 at the time of procurement, as follows: • Assistance Listing No. 93.310, OD023121 – $53,482 Context: Internal Control We sampled nine federal procurements over $25,000 to test operating effectiveness of internal controls, totaling $962,393, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For seven of the 11 federal procurements tested totaling $770,093, procurement controls were not operating effectively. • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the independent suspension and debarment check to be performed at the time of procurement was not performed until approximately two to eight months later. Compliance We sampled 11 federal procurements over $25,000 to test compliance, totaling $1,736,844, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For one of 11 federal procurements tested totaling $53,482, documentation retained was not adequate to support that the procurement transaction was executed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.320(a)(2)(i) and (b). • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Procurement-related expenditures are approximately 9% of total Federal expenditures for the R&D Cluster of $445,961,340 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat of the finding of the prior year. Recommendation: The Clinic should ensure that all R&D awards that require procurement of goods and services follow established policies, procedures, and internal controls to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and that the procurement justification form is reviewed prior to entering into the purchase transaction. The Clinic should ensure that independent checks for suspension and debarment should be timely completed at the time of procurement in accordance with the Clinic documented policies, procedures, and internal controls. Views of responsible officials: Management will reinforce education and training to the research community and procurement teams regarding the procurement requirements, Justification of Source Selection Checklist/Form, and timely completion of the required documentation. The Clinic utilizes a third party, Visual Compliance, to execute daily supplier sanction and debarment checks for all Mayo Clinic vendors. All third party suspension and debarment match alerts are reviewed and adjudicated as needed. Going forward, the Clinic will supplement this daily review by periodically validating a sample of vendors who are not flagged with an alert by Visual Compliance.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Defense Federal Cluster: Research and Development (R&D) Pass-Through Entity: The University of Texas Health (93.853, NS119834) Assistance Listing Nos.: 12.420, 93.310, 93.353, 93.393, and 93.853 Award Numbers: W81XWH-15-1-0292 (12.420), OD23121 (93.310), CA246568 (93.353), CA259201 (93.393), NS119834 (93.853), NS122096 (93.853) Award Periods: Various Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Section 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding small purchases: “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Section 200.320(b) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding formal procurement methods to be followed: “When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.” Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” The Clinic procurement justification form for procurements more than $25,000 requires completion of the rationale for the procurement and a search of the federal government’s exclusion list to be performed and documented at the time of the procurement. On a monthly basis, Supply Chain Management performs a review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Condition: Internal Control For five (56%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls, the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the history of the procurement and compliance with Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, was not completed until after the purchase order was created and/or invoice received from the vendor. In addition, for these same five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not timely document its suspension and debarment check at the time of procurement as required by its procurement justification form. In addition, for four (44%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls (two of which relate to the five cited above), the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the procurement transaction’s compliance with policies, procedures and the Uniform Guidance was outdated. Furthermore, the monthly review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures was not operating effectively. Compliance For one (9%) of 11 procurement transactions tested for compliance, the procurement was an add-on purchase related to a larger procurement of the same product under a prior purchase order. The prior procurement was above the simplified acquisition threshold and the Clinic’s competitive bid threshold. The Clinic did not complete a procurement justification form for the add-on purchase (which was a small purchase), and the original procurement did not have adequate support to evidence that it had been competitively bid. As such, adequate documentation did not exist for the procurement in accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 230.320(a)(2)(i) and(b). In addition, for five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Cause: While management has internal controls in place to review procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures and Uniform Guidance CFR 200.320, the review of the procurement justification form is not robust enough to identify errors and there is not a process in place to ensure the form is completed prior to the purchase. Effect or potential effect: The Clinic’s internal controls over procurement were not properly followed during the fiscal year. In addition, the Clinic did not follow the Uniform Guidance requirements related to small purchases and noncompetitive procurements. Questioned costs: $53,482, determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the one procurement transaction that had inadequate support for compliance with CFR 200.320 at the time of procurement, as follows: • Assistance Listing No. 93.310, OD023121 – $53,482 Context: Internal Control We sampled nine federal procurements over $25,000 to test operating effectiveness of internal controls, totaling $962,393, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For seven of the 11 federal procurements tested totaling $770,093, procurement controls were not operating effectively. • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the independent suspension and debarment check to be performed at the time of procurement was not performed until approximately two to eight months later. Compliance We sampled 11 federal procurements over $25,000 to test compliance, totaling $1,736,844, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For one of 11 federal procurements tested totaling $53,482, documentation retained was not adequate to support that the procurement transaction was executed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.320(a)(2)(i) and (b). • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Procurement-related expenditures are approximately 9% of total Federal expenditures for the R&D Cluster of $445,961,340 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat of the finding of the prior year. Recommendation: The Clinic should ensure that all R&D awards that require procurement of goods and services follow established policies, procedures, and internal controls to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and that the procurement justification form is reviewed prior to entering into the purchase transaction. The Clinic should ensure that independent checks for suspension and debarment should be timely completed at the time of procurement in accordance with the Clinic documented policies, procedures, and internal controls. Views of responsible officials: Management will reinforce education and training to the research community and procurement teams regarding the procurement requirements, Justification of Source Selection Checklist/Form, and timely completion of the required documentation. The Clinic utilizes a third party, Visual Compliance, to execute daily supplier sanction and debarment checks for all Mayo Clinic vendors. All third party suspension and debarment match alerts are reviewed and adjudicated as needed. Going forward, the Clinic will supplement this daily review by periodically validating a sample of vendors who are not flagged with an alert by Visual Compliance.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Defense Federal Cluster: Research and Development (R&D) Pass-Through Entity: The University of Texas Health (93.853, NS119834) Assistance Listing Nos.: 12.420, 93.310, 93.353, 93.393, and 93.853 Award Numbers: W81XWH-15-1-0292 (12.420), OD23121 (93.310), CA246568 (93.353), CA259201 (93.393), NS119834 (93.853), NS122096 (93.853) Award Periods: Various Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Section 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding small purchases: “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Section 200.320(b) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding formal procurement methods to be followed: “When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.” Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” The Clinic procurement justification form for procurements more than $25,000 requires completion of the rationale for the procurement and a search of the federal government’s exclusion list to be performed and documented at the time of the procurement. On a monthly basis, Supply Chain Management performs a review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Condition: Internal Control For five (56%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls, the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the history of the procurement and compliance with Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, was not completed until after the purchase order was created and/or invoice received from the vendor. In addition, for these same five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not timely document its suspension and debarment check at the time of procurement as required by its procurement justification form. In addition, for four (44%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls (two of which relate to the five cited above), the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the procurement transaction’s compliance with policies, procedures and the Uniform Guidance was outdated. Furthermore, the monthly review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures was not operating effectively. Compliance For one (9%) of 11 procurement transactions tested for compliance, the procurement was an add-on purchase related to a larger procurement of the same product under a prior purchase order. The prior procurement was above the simplified acquisition threshold and the Clinic’s competitive bid threshold. The Clinic did not complete a procurement justification form for the add-on purchase (which was a small purchase), and the original procurement did not have adequate support to evidence that it had been competitively bid. As such, adequate documentation did not exist for the procurement in accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 230.320(a)(2)(i) and(b). In addition, for five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Cause: While management has internal controls in place to review procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures and Uniform Guidance CFR 200.320, the review of the procurement justification form is not robust enough to identify errors and there is not a process in place to ensure the form is completed prior to the purchase. Effect or potential effect: The Clinic’s internal controls over procurement were not properly followed during the fiscal year. In addition, the Clinic did not follow the Uniform Guidance requirements related to small purchases and noncompetitive procurements. Questioned costs: $53,482, determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the one procurement transaction that had inadequate support for compliance with CFR 200.320 at the time of procurement, as follows: • Assistance Listing No. 93.310, OD023121 – $53,482 Context: Internal Control We sampled nine federal procurements over $25,000 to test operating effectiveness of internal controls, totaling $962,393, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For seven of the 11 federal procurements tested totaling $770,093, procurement controls were not operating effectively. • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the independent suspension and debarment check to be performed at the time of procurement was not performed until approximately two to eight months later. Compliance We sampled 11 federal procurements over $25,000 to test compliance, totaling $1,736,844, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For one of 11 federal procurements tested totaling $53,482, documentation retained was not adequate to support that the procurement transaction was executed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.320(a)(2)(i) and (b). • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Procurement-related expenditures are approximately 9% of total Federal expenditures for the R&D Cluster of $445,961,340 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat of the finding of the prior year. Recommendation: The Clinic should ensure that all R&D awards that require procurement of goods and services follow established policies, procedures, and internal controls to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and that the procurement justification form is reviewed prior to entering into the purchase transaction. The Clinic should ensure that independent checks for suspension and debarment should be timely completed at the time of procurement in accordance with the Clinic documented policies, procedures, and internal controls. Views of responsible officials: Management will reinforce education and training to the research community and procurement teams regarding the procurement requirements, Justification of Source Selection Checklist/Form, and timely completion of the required documentation. The Clinic utilizes a third party, Visual Compliance, to execute daily supplier sanction and debarment checks for all Mayo Clinic vendors. All third party suspension and debarment match alerts are reviewed and adjudicated as needed. Going forward, the Clinic will supplement this daily review by periodically validating a sample of vendors who are not flagged with an alert by Visual Compliance.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Defense Federal Cluster: Research and Development (R&D) Pass-Through Entity: The University of Texas Health (93.853, NS119834) Assistance Listing Nos.: 12.420, 93.310, 93.353, 93.393, and 93.853 Award Numbers: W81XWH-15-1-0292 (12.420), OD23121 (93.310), CA246568 (93.353), CA259201 (93.393), NS119834 (93.853), NS122096 (93.853) Award Periods: Various Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Section 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding small purchases: “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Section 200.320(b) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding formal procurement methods to be followed: “When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.” Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” The Clinic procurement justification form for procurements more than $25,000 requires completion of the rationale for the procurement and a search of the federal government’s exclusion list to be performed and documented at the time of the procurement. On a monthly basis, Supply Chain Management performs a review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Condition: Internal Control For five (56%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls, the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the history of the procurement and compliance with Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, was not completed until after the purchase order was created and/or invoice received from the vendor. In addition, for these same five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not timely document its suspension and debarment check at the time of procurement as required by its procurement justification form. In addition, for four (44%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls (two of which relate to the five cited above), the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the procurement transaction’s compliance with policies, procedures and the Uniform Guidance was outdated. Furthermore, the monthly review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures was not operating effectively. Compliance For one (9%) of 11 procurement transactions tested for compliance, the procurement was an add-on purchase related to a larger procurement of the same product under a prior purchase order. The prior procurement was above the simplified acquisition threshold and the Clinic’s competitive bid threshold. The Clinic did not complete a procurement justification form for the add-on purchase (which was a small purchase), and the original procurement did not have adequate support to evidence that it had been competitively bid. As such, adequate documentation did not exist for the procurement in accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 230.320(a)(2)(i) and(b). In addition, for five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Cause: While management has internal controls in place to review procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures and Uniform Guidance CFR 200.320, the review of the procurement justification form is not robust enough to identify errors and there is not a process in place to ensure the form is completed prior to the purchase. Effect or potential effect: The Clinic’s internal controls over procurement were not properly followed during the fiscal year. In addition, the Clinic did not follow the Uniform Guidance requirements related to small purchases and noncompetitive procurements. Questioned costs: $53,482, determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the one procurement transaction that had inadequate support for compliance with CFR 200.320 at the time of procurement, as follows: • Assistance Listing No. 93.310, OD023121 – $53,482 Context: Internal Control We sampled nine federal procurements over $25,000 to test operating effectiveness of internal controls, totaling $962,393, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For seven of the 11 federal procurements tested totaling $770,093, procurement controls were not operating effectively. • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the independent suspension and debarment check to be performed at the time of procurement was not performed until approximately two to eight months later. Compliance We sampled 11 federal procurements over $25,000 to test compliance, totaling $1,736,844, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For one of 11 federal procurements tested totaling $53,482, documentation retained was not adequate to support that the procurement transaction was executed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.320(a)(2)(i) and (b). • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Procurement-related expenditures are approximately 9% of total Federal expenditures for the R&D Cluster of $445,961,340 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat of the finding of the prior year. Recommendation: The Clinic should ensure that all R&D awards that require procurement of goods and services follow established policies, procedures, and internal controls to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and that the procurement justification form is reviewed prior to entering into the purchase transaction. The Clinic should ensure that independent checks for suspension and debarment should be timely completed at the time of procurement in accordance with the Clinic documented policies, procedures, and internal controls. Views of responsible officials: Management will reinforce education and training to the research community and procurement teams regarding the procurement requirements, Justification of Source Selection Checklist/Form, and timely completion of the required documentation. The Clinic utilizes a third party, Visual Compliance, to execute daily supplier sanction and debarment checks for all Mayo Clinic vendors. All third party suspension and debarment match alerts are reviewed and adjudicated as needed. Going forward, the Clinic will supplement this daily review by periodically validating a sample of vendors who are not flagged with an alert by Visual Compliance.
Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of the federal program: Federal Agencies: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Defense Federal Cluster: Research and Development (R&D) Pass-Through Entity: The University of Texas Health (93.853, NS119834) Assistance Listing Nos.: 12.420, 93.310, 93.353, 93.393, and 93.853 Award Numbers: W81XWH-15-1-0292 (12.420), OD23121 (93.310), CA246568 (93.353), CA259201 (93.393), NS119834 (93.853), NS122096 (93.853) Award Periods: Various Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Section 200.320(a)(2)(i) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding small purchases: “The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity.” Section 200.320(b) of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding formal procurement methods to be followed: “When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section.” Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” The Clinic procurement justification form for procurements more than $25,000 requires completion of the rationale for the procurement and a search of the federal government’s exclusion list to be performed and documented at the time of the procurement. On a monthly basis, Supply Chain Management performs a review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures. Condition: Internal Control For five (56%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls, the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the history of the procurement and compliance with Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, was not completed until after the purchase order was created and/or invoice received from the vendor. In addition, for these same five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not timely document its suspension and debarment check at the time of procurement as required by its procurement justification form. In addition, for four (44%) of nine procurement transactions tested for operating effectiveness of internal controls (two of which relate to the five cited above), the procurement justification form used by the Clinic to document the procurement transaction’s compliance with policies, procedures and the Uniform Guidance was outdated. Furthermore, the monthly review of completed procurement justification forms related to procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures was not operating effectively. Compliance For one (9%) of 11 procurement transactions tested for compliance, the procurement was an add-on purchase related to a larger procurement of the same product under a prior purchase order. The prior procurement was above the simplified acquisition threshold and the Clinic’s competitive bid threshold. The Clinic did not complete a procurement justification form for the add-on purchase (which was a small purchase), and the original procurement did not have adequate support to evidence that it had been competitively bid. As such, adequate documentation did not exist for the procurement in accordance with Uniform Guidance Section 230.320(a)(2)(i) and(b). In addition, for five procurement transactions, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Cause: While management has internal controls in place to review procurements > $25,000 to ensure they are documented in accordance with the Clinic’s procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures and Uniform Guidance CFR 200.320, the review of the procurement justification form is not robust enough to identify errors and there is not a process in place to ensure the form is completed prior to the purchase. Effect or potential effect: The Clinic’s internal controls over procurement were not properly followed during the fiscal year. In addition, the Clinic did not follow the Uniform Guidance requirements related to small purchases and noncompetitive procurements. Questioned costs: $53,482, determined as the amount of the procurement expenditures included in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the one procurement transaction that had inadequate support for compliance with CFR 200.320 at the time of procurement, as follows: • Assistance Listing No. 93.310, OD023121 – $53,482 Context: Internal Control We sampled nine federal procurements over $25,000 to test operating effectiveness of internal controls, totaling $962,393, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For seven of the 11 federal procurements tested totaling $770,093, procurement controls were not operating effectively. • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the independent suspension and debarment check to be performed at the time of procurement was not performed until approximately two to eight months later. Compliance We sampled 11 federal procurements over $25,000 to test compliance, totaling $1,736,844, from a population of 74 federal procurements over $25,000, totaling $5,400,242 and noted the following: • For one of 11 federal procurements tested totaling $53,482, documentation retained was not adequate to support that the procurement transaction was executed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.320(a)(2)(i) and (b). • For five of 11 procurement transactions tested totaling $529,273, the Clinic did not follow its suspension and debarment procedures as required by its procurement justification form. Procurement-related expenditures are approximately 9% of total Federal expenditures for the R&D Cluster of $445,961,340 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat of the finding of the prior year. Recommendation: The Clinic should ensure that all R&D awards that require procurement of goods and services follow established policies, procedures, and internal controls to comply with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards and that the procurement justification form is reviewed prior to entering into the purchase transaction. The Clinic should ensure that independent checks for suspension and debarment should be timely completed at the time of procurement in accordance with the Clinic documented policies, procedures, and internal controls. Views of responsible officials: Management will reinforce education and training to the research community and procurement teams regarding the procurement requirements, Justification of Source Selection Checklist/Form, and timely completion of the required documentation. The Clinic utilizes a third party, Visual Compliance, to execute daily supplier sanction and debarment checks for all Mayo Clinic vendors. All third party suspension and debarment match alerts are reviewed and adjudicated as needed. Going forward, the Clinic will supplement this daily review by periodically validating a sample of vendors who are not flagged with an alert by Visual Compliance.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined that ASCB did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as ASCB's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted one item selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend ASCB retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.
Finding 2023-002: Procurement Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined that ASCB did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place to ensure that procurement requirements were adequately documented and retained. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as ASCB's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted one item selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend ASCB retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is set at $250,000 unless a lower more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, this threshold and formal procurement methods must be used when procuring goods and services in excess of $150,000. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures and obtaining sealed bids or proposals. The Town had a documented procurement policy; however, the Town did not follow its policy for one of the two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The vendor, paid $2,419,821, was chosen without obtaining sealed bids or proposals, nor was a formal contract entered into with the vendor. Furthermore, there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement or the Town's justification for limiting competition. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one vendor noted above. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The Town's policies related to the SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements included a clause or condition added to covered transactions expected to equal or exceed $25,000 with that vendor. Three vendors were identified as having transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000. All three vendors were selected for testing. The three vendors, with total expenditures of $4,333,484, were reviewed. For all three vendors, the Town did not have documented evidence that the clause was included in the contract with the vendor nor that any other methods were employed to verify the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or other excluded prior to entering into the transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systematic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.324(a) states: "The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: ". . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Town did not adhere to its procurement policy as written. Instead, a vendor was selected based on factors other than solicited bids. In addition, the Town was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate they included a clause in contracts or otherwise verified contractors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into the transaction as a direct result of the Town's policy not addressing those vendors not requiring a contract and not following the policy for those vendors who had a contract. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Town cannot ensure goods and services were properly procured. As a result, one vendor paid did not have adequate documentation to support that the appropriate bid process was followed or that nonprocurement procedures were permissible. Furthermore, without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Town cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the Town used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering contracts or subawards, and document reasons for vendors that are chosen without adhering to formal procurement methods. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report for suspension and debarment. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The County did not have a County Council approved procurement policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The County had five vendors that qualified for testing under small purchase procurement requirements (vendors paid $10,000-$150,000). Of the two chosen for testing, one was awarded a contract without the County obtaining quotes. The contract awarded was $31,000 for engineering services related to drain construction. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the small purchase identified above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the U.S. Department of the Treasury's (Treasury) determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County, in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the County explained they were aware of the suspension and debarment requirements related to the SLFRF awards; however, the County did not retain documentation of SAMs.gov checks nor was a clause always included in a contract. A population of ten covered transactions for goods or services, totaling $2,371,047, that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of three transactions, totaling $1,473,295, was selected for testing. For each of the three transactions, the County did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions identified, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to expand the sample size or perform any additional audit procedures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are de-barred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states in part: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by the management of the County. The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it checked SAM.gov to verify that contractors and vendors were not suspended or debarred. The County was also unable to provide documentation explaining the rationale behind decisions to offer contracts without obtaining an adequate number of bids or quotes. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, one small purchase did not have an adequate number of quotes. In addition, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In addition, we recommended the County adhere to the procurement policies and obtain required quotes and bids or adequately document a sole source situation. Finally, we recommended that the County strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Water and Wastewater Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Numbers or Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): EDA Grant / 06-79-06190, RD Loan 01 / 06-79-06190 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CITY OF PETERSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the City had five vendors with purchases over the $150,000 threshold that were considered simplified acquisition procurements. Only one vendor was selected for testing due to the procurement requirements being tested on the other four vendors during the prior audit. For the one vendor, the City could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with this vendor during 2023 was $414,465. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one vendor noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 CITY OF PETERSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Cause The City was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate they had properly procured services. A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed or implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot demonstrate it obtained an adequate number of price or rate quotations prior to selecting a vendor. Therefore, the City could have overpaid for the services obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.