U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Illinois Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Education, and North Dakota Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program, 10.553 National School Lunch Program, 10.555 Summer Food Service Program for Children, 10.559 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 on the Consolidated Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the search for suspension and debarment was performed subsequent to entering into covered transactions with three vendors. Cause: The Organization has designated internal controls over this area; however, the controls were not performed timely. Effect: Failure to document the search for suspension and debarment before entering into the covered transaction could result in noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: 7 vendors out of 31 vendors total were selected for testing which made up $240,437 of $572,161 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Illinois Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Education, and North Dakota Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program, 10.553 National School Lunch Program, 10.555 Summer Food Service Program for Children, 10.559 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 on the Consolidated Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the search for suspension and debarment was performed subsequent to entering into covered transactions with three vendors. Cause: The Organization has designated internal controls over this area; however, the controls were not performed timely. Effect: Failure to document the search for suspension and debarment before entering into the covered transaction could result in noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: 7 vendors out of 31 vendors total were selected for testing which made up $240,437 of $572,161 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Illinois Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Education, and North Dakota Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program, 10.553 National School Lunch Program, 10.555 Summer Food Service Program for Children, 10.559 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 on the Consolidated Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the search for suspension and debarment was performed subsequent to entering into covered transactions with three vendors. Cause: The Organization has designated internal controls over this area; however, the controls were not performed timely. Effect: Failure to document the search for suspension and debarment before entering into the covered transaction could result in noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: 7 vendors out of 31 vendors total were selected for testing which made up $240,437 of $572,161 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Illinois Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Education, and North Dakota Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program, 10.553 National School Lunch Program, 10.555 Summer Food Service Program for Children, 10.559 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 on the Consolidated Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the search for suspension and debarment was performed subsequent to entering into covered transactions with three vendors. Cause: The Organization has designated internal controls over this area; however, the controls were not performed timely. Effect: Failure to document the search for suspension and debarment before entering into the covered transaction could result in noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: 7 vendors out of 31 vendors total were selected for testing which made up $240,437 of $572,161 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Illinois Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Education, and North Dakota Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program, 10.553 National School Lunch Program, 10.555 Summer Food Service Program for Children, 10.559 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 on the Consolidated Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the search for suspension and debarment was performed subsequent to entering into covered transactions with three vendors. Cause: The Organization has designated internal controls over this area; however, the controls were not performed timely. Effect: Failure to document the search for suspension and debarment before entering into the covered transaction could result in noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: 7 vendors out of 31 vendors total were selected for testing which made up $240,437 of $572,161 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Illinois Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Education, and North Dakota Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program, 10.553 National School Lunch Program, 10.555 Summer Food Service Program for Children, 10.559 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 on the Consolidated Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the search for suspension and debarment was performed subsequent to entering into covered transactions with three vendors. Cause: The Organization has designated internal controls over this area; however, the controls were not performed timely. Effect: Failure to document the search for suspension and debarment before entering into the covered transaction could result in noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: 7 vendors out of 31 vendors total were selected for testing which made up $240,437 of $572,161 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Illinois Department of Education, Minnesota Department of Education, and North Dakota Department of Education Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program, 10.553 National School Lunch Program, 10.555 Summer Food Service Program for Children, 10.559 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Grant Award Number: Affects all grant awards under assistance listing 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 on the Consolidated Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that the search for suspension and debarment was performed subsequent to entering into covered transactions with three vendors. Cause: The Organization has designated internal controls over this area; however, the controls were not performed timely. Effect: Failure to document the search for suspension and debarment before entering into the covered transaction could result in noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: 7 vendors out of 31 vendors total were selected for testing which made up $240,437 of $572,161 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management review vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into contracts to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding.
U.S. Department of Treasury passed through Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (ALN Number): Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recover Funds (21.027) Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The District’s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The District also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition: We selected two contracts to test for compliance with procurementstandards. Records for one contract lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause: The District did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect: A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable Repeat finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the District ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: The District will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Questioned Costs: None Condition: The Foundation was able to provide a procurement policy, but it was not in accordance with the Federal procurement requirements within Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Foundation does not have internal controls in place surrounding procurement policies and procedures. Effect: We were unable to test procurement due to lack of a procurement policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The lack of internal controls surrounding the procurement policies and procedures could lead to potential funding issues in the future. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Foundation Response: Management agrees with the finding.
FINDING 2023-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): SLFRP 3041 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 13 VERMILLION COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement suspension and debarment regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor. There were two vendors subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period. Both vendors were selected for testing. The County did not perform procedures to ensure either vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Additionally, the County did not have a formalized procurement policy outlining its processes and procedures with regards to the procurement of goods and services using federal grant funds. The policy must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327 and should address ensuring vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions if the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period and enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 VERMILLION COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non- Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the County. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design and implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Furthermore, with adequately designed and implemented policies that reflect the federal regulations as required, the County cannot ensure that goods and services paid with federal funds are properly procured. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a system of internal controls to ensure that verifications are performed to determine whether each contractor has been suspended or debarred from participating in federal contracts prior to making payment. In addition, we recommended the County develop a procurement policy that addresses and adheres to the federal requirements outlined in regulations. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Audit Cluster 20.507 Federal Transit Formula Grant (applies to all grants) 2023-004 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance regulations (2 CFR section 200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for purchases of goods and services follow certain procedures related to obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive-, and non-competitive proposals. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.318(d) provides that written policies and procedures must document the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and 2 CFR section 200.303(a) regulations require the entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of grant awards. In addition, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Condition: The portion related to procurement is a repeated finding from 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. During our testing of purchases under the procurement regulations, for 3 out of 8 vendors selected for testing, the System was unable to provide supporting documentation that these vendor services or supplies were procured in accordance with the standards in 2 CFR section 200.320. Additionally, while the System does maintain written policies and procedures related to procurement standards, these procedures were followed for items procured directly through the procurement department, however, FTA expenditures procured by the maintenance department did not follow the approved procedures and internal controls in accordance with the regulations referenced in the criteria above. During our testing of compliance with the suspension and debarment regulations, for 3 out of 8 vendors selected for testing (same vendors selected for procurement testing above), the System was unable to provide documentation of its conclusions that these vendors were not suspended or debarred. Based on a review of SAM.gov, none of these vendors were suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: Known - $214,478, Likely - $561,548 for Procurement but not Suspension and Debarment. Cause: A significant deficiency exists in the internal controls over procurement and suspension and debarment for expenditures procured outside the normal processes of the procurement department. The System does not have adequate controls in place to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained for purchases made under the procurement standards to support the System’s consideration and/or conclusion for obtaining and awarding of contracts based on sealed bid, competitive, and non-competitive proposals or its determination of whether the vendor is suspended or debarred, when procured outside of the procurement department. Effect: The System may not be receiving the overall lowest cost for services and supplies procured by the agency. Without ensuring documentation is maintained over whether a vendor is suspended or debarred, the System may enter into contracts with unauthorized parties. Recommendation: We recommend the System implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the System enhance its written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies should include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a annual basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. A review of all contracts to ensure the appropriate language exists regarding suspension and debarment regulations or the System should consider an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors. View of Responsible Official: The Agency will implement internal controls to ensure that supporting documentation is maintained for the procurement of goods and services in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.320. The Agency will update our written policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is included regarding the avoidance of the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Documentation and policies will include procedures for the competitive bidding of bus parts on a quarterly basis and evidence that purchases are from these bid responses and from the lowest qualified vendor. Procurement will perform an annual review of SAM.gov for all vendors.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement Federal regulations require formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), which is set at $250,000 unless a lower more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, this threshold and formal procurement methods must be used when procuring goods and services in excess of $150,000. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures and obtaining sealed bids or proposals. The Town had a documented procurement policy; however, the Town did not follow its policy for one of the two vendors that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold. The vendor, paid $2,419,821, was chosen without obtaining sealed bids or proposals, nor was a formal contract entered into with the vendor. Furthermore, there was no documentation detailing the history of the procurement or the Town's justification for limiting competition. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one vendor noted above. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. The Town's policies related to the SLFRF suspension and debarment requirements included a clause or condition added to covered transactions expected to equal or exceed $25,000 with that vendor. Three vendors were identified as having transactions that equaled or exceeded $25,000. All three vendors were selected for testing. The three vendors, with total expenditures of $4,333,484, were reviewed. For all three vendors, the Town did not have documented evidence that the clause was included in the contract with the vendor nor that any other methods were employed to verify the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or other excluded prior to entering into the transactions. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systematic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.324(a) states: "The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: ". . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. (i) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (A) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (B) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (C) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (D) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (E) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. They are awarded in accordance with the following requirements: (i) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified offerors. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (ii) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and making selections; (iii) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity, with price and other factors considered; and (iv) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby offeror's qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified offeror is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms that are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 TOWN OF BROWNSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Town did not adhere to its procurement policy as written. Instead, a vendor was selected based on factors other than solicited bids. In addition, the Town was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate they included a clause in contracts or otherwise verified contractors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into the transaction as a direct result of the Town's policy not addressing those vendors not requiring a contract and not following the policy for those vendors who had a contract. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Town cannot ensure goods and services were properly procured. As a result, one vendor paid did not have adequate documentation to support that the appropriate bid process was followed or that nonprocurement procedures were permissible. Furthermore, without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Town cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the Town used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future funding to the Town. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the Town establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering contracts or subawards, and document reasons for vendors that are chosen without adhering to formal procurement methods. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.318 - 200.326 require written policies concerning methods of procurement for goods and services. Condition: The Foundation did not have a written procurement policy that included all of the required elements during 2023. Cause: This is the first year that the Foundation was required to have a Single audit and as such is still in the process of developing and adopting specific policies and procedures to ensure its internal practices are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The Foundation is not in compliance with Section 200.318 - 200.326 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend that the Foundation adopt a formal written procurement policy in the format and with the elements required by 2 CFR Sections 200.318 to 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Foundation’s management team agrees with this finding and remains fully committed to both developing and adopting specific procurement policies for federal expenditures which will better ensure its internal practices are in alignment with the Uniform Guidance.
Department of Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing No. 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Immaterial Instance of Noncompliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the City did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with contracting and awarding contracts to lower tier entities. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – All vendors, which totaled one, were selected for procurement testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – No Recommendation – Management should establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. View of responsible officials – Management is in agreement with the finding.
Department of Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing No. 21.027 COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Immaterial Instance of Noncompliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension and debarment it was identified that the City did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of documented policies increase the overall risk that employees are not aware of the specific requirements with contracting and awarding contracts to lower tier entities. Questioned Costs – None reported Context/Sampling – All vendors, which totaled one, were selected for procurement testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – No Recommendation – Management should establish a written policy that addresses all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. View of responsible officials – Management is in agreement with the finding.
Department of the Treasury, Passed through North Dakota Office of Management and Budget Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment it was identified that the City did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of compliant policies increases the overall risk of non-compliance. Questioned Costs – None reported. Context/Sampling – Overall procurement policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes, prior year finding 2022-007. Recommendation – We recommend that management establish a written policy that is in compliance with all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023-003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarrment Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Year of Finding Origination: 2023 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: SLT0790, 2021; E-20-MW-27-0003, 2020 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Health Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318(i) states that the City must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, and the City must perform a cost or price analysis provided in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.323. In addition, federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. The suspension and debarment requirements apply to covered transaction amounts over $25,000. Entities must use their documented procurement process compliance. The City’s procurement policy requires a suspension and debarment clause be included in the contract and also requires the contract manager to verify the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded at SAM.gov. Condition: Five of the nine contracts tested exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold which requires a cost or price analysis. The City could not provide documentation that this analysis was performed for four contracts tested. Additionally, a sample of 20 covered transactions was tested for suspension and debarment. In two instances, the City included required suspension and debarment contract clauses but did not maintain documentation of the verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred at SAM.gov. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Nine of 89 contracts were tested for compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, there were 191 covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment. The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal regulations. Cause: Project/contract managers did not perform or maintain documentation of cost or price analyses. The project/contract managers did not know verification of suspension and debarment using the federal listing was required and, in one instance, relied on the state listing. Recommendation: We recommend the City review its written policies and procedures and communicate with contract managers their responsibility for complying with the federal regulations and maintaining documentation to support that compliance. View of Responsible Official: Concur
2023-003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarrment Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Year of Finding Origination: 2023 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: SLT0790, 2021; E-20-MW-27-0003, 2020 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Health Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318(i) states that the City must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, and the City must perform a cost or price analysis provided in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.323. In addition, federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. The suspension and debarment requirements apply to covered transaction amounts over $25,000. Entities must use their documented procurement process compliance. The City’s procurement policy requires a suspension and debarment clause be included in the contract and also requires the contract manager to verify the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded at SAM.gov. Condition: Five of the nine contracts tested exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold which requires a cost or price analysis. The City could not provide documentation that this analysis was performed for four contracts tested. Additionally, a sample of 20 covered transactions was tested for suspension and debarment. In two instances, the City included required suspension and debarment contract clauses but did not maintain documentation of the verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred at SAM.gov. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Nine of 89 contracts were tested for compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, there were 191 covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment. The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal regulations. Cause: Project/contract managers did not perform or maintain documentation of cost or price analyses. The project/contract managers did not know verification of suspension and debarment using the federal listing was required and, in one instance, relied on the state listing. Recommendation: We recommend the City review its written policies and procedures and communicate with contract managers their responsibility for complying with the federal regulations and maintaining documentation to support that compliance. View of Responsible Official: Concur
2023-003 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarrment Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Year of Finding Origination: 2023 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 21.027 COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: SLT0790, 2021; E-20-MW-27-0003, 2020 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Health Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318(i) states that the City must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, and the City must perform a cost or price analysis provided in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.323. In addition, federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction. The suspension and debarment requirements apply to covered transaction amounts over $25,000. Entities must use their documented procurement process compliance. The City’s procurement policy requires a suspension and debarment clause be included in the contract and also requires the contract manager to verify the vendor is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded at SAM.gov. Condition: Five of the nine contracts tested exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold which requires a cost or price analysis. The City could not provide documentation that this analysis was performed for four contracts tested. Additionally, a sample of 20 covered transactions was tested for suspension and debarment. In two instances, the City included required suspension and debarment contract clauses but did not maintain documentation of the verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred at SAM.gov. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Nine of 89 contracts were tested for compliance with applicable federal regulations. Additionally, there were 191 covered transactions subject to suspension and debarment. The sample size was based on guidance from Chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: The City is not in compliance with federal regulations. Cause: Project/contract managers did not perform or maintain documentation of cost or price analyses. The project/contract managers did not know verification of suspension and debarment using the federal listing was required and, in one instance, relied on the state listing. Recommendation: We recommend the City review its written policies and procedures and communicate with contract managers their responsibility for complying with the federal regulations and maintaining documentation to support that compliance. View of Responsible Official: Concur
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report for suspension and debarment. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context Procurement - Policy The County did not have a County Council approved procurement policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Procurement - Small Purchases Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $50,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The County had five vendors that qualified for testing under small purchase procurement requirements (vendors paid $10,000-$150,000). Of the two chosen for testing, one was awarded a contract without the County obtaining quotes. The contract awarded was $31,000 for engineering services related to drain construction. The lack of effective internal controls and noncompliance was isolated to the small purchase identified above. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the U.S. Department of the Treasury's (Treasury) determination that the revenue loss eligible use category does not give rise to subawards, the County was only required to comply with suspension and debarment requirements related to covered transactions. Upon inquiry of the County, in order to review the procedures in place for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, the County explained they were aware of the suspension and debarment requirements related to the SLFRF awards; however, the County did not retain documentation of SAMs.gov checks nor was a clause always included in a contract. A population of ten covered transactions for goods or services, totaling $2,371,047, that equaled or exceeded $25,000 paid from SLFRF funds during the audit period was identified. A sample of three transactions, totaling $1,473,295, was selected for testing. For each of the three transactions, the County did not verify the vendors' suspension and debarment status prior to payment. Due to the number and magnitude of exceptions identified, per auditor judgment, we concluded it would not be appropriate to expand the sample size or perform any additional audit procedures. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318 states: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are de-barred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 BOONE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Part 4 of the Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance states in part: ". . . recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by the management of the County. The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it checked SAM.gov to verify that contractors and vendors were not suspended or debarred. The County was also unable to provide documentation explaining the rationale behind decisions to offer contracts without obtaining an adequate number of bids or quotes. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, one small purchase did not have an adequate number of quotes. In addition, vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the County establish documented procurement procedures consistent with state and local laws for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward as outlined in the code of federal regulations. In addition, we recommended the County adhere to the procurement policies and obtain required quotes and bids or adequately document a sole source situation. Finally, we recommended that the County strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-002 Subject: Water and Wastewater Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Numbers or Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): EDA Grant / 06-79-06190, RD Loan 01 / 06-79-06190 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 CITY OF PETERSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During the audit period, the City had five vendors with purchases over the $150,000 threshold that were considered simplified acquisition procurements. Only one vendor was selected for testing due to the procurement requirements being tested on the other four vendors during the prior audit. For the one vendor, the City could not provide the procurement history or the rationale for the method of procurement, the selection of vendor, or the basis for price. The total dollar amount spent with this vendor during 2023 was $414,465. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the one vendor noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320(b) states in part: "Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 CITY OF PETERSBURG SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Cause The City was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate they had properly procured services. A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the City. Embedded within a properly designed or implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the City's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the City cannot demonstrate it obtained an adequate number of price or rate quotations prior to selecting a vendor. Therefore, the City could have overpaid for the services obtained. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the City strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained. We also recommended strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained to be presented for audit. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Identification of the federal program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.351 – Research Infrastructure Programs 93.855 – Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.855 – COVID-19 Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research 93.RD – NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response 75N93021C00014 9/1/2021-8/31/2024 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1U19AI171403-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2025 Emory University 1U19AI171443-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 The Scripps Research Institute 1U19AI171110-01 5/16/2022-4/30/2023 University of California at San Francisco 5R01AI134240-05 7/1/2022-6/30/2024 N/A 5R01AI134245-07 5/1/2023-4/30/2025 N/A 5R01AI170197-02 2/1/2023-1/31/2024 N/A 5P51OD011133-25 5/1/2023-4/30/2024 N/A 1R21AI170148-01 8/18/2022-7/31/2023 N/A Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) 2 CFR 200.303(a) requires that a non-federal entity must “(a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” 2 CFR 200.318 (i) General Procurement Standards states, “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation) (continued) 2 CFR 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states, “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.” Condition Texas Biomed did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause Texas Biomed did not have effective internal controls and procedures in place to ensure Texas Biomed maintained records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement and other required elements. Effect or potential effect Texas Biomed did not comply with the general procurement standards and methods of procurement to be followed per the Uniform Guidance to maintain sufficient detail of the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the method of procurement. Questioned costs $94,637 in total as follows: $27,795 – Assistance Listing Number 93.351, Award Identification Number – 5P51OD011133-25 $7,727 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171443-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171403-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 1U19AI171110-01 $1,909 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134240-05 $2,520 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 5R01AI134245-07 Questioned costs (continued) $18,404 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855 (COVID-19), Award Identification Number – 5R01AI170197-02 $24,693 – Assistance Listing Number 93.855, Award Identification Number – 1R21AI170148-01 $3,863 – Assistance Listing Number 93.RD NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response, Award Identification Number – 75N93021C00014 Questioned costs were computed by using the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation regarding the history of the procurement, including the rationale of the procurement. Context EY selected and tested 15 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $3,304,871 from a population of 86 procurements over $10,000 with expenditures totaling $5,901,397 charged to the Research and Development cluster during the year ended December 31, 2023. For 4 procurements with expenditures in the amounts of $12,715, $10,119, $27,795, and $24,693, Texas Biomed did not obtain quotes or document sole source justification or the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. For 1 procurement with expenditures in the amount of $19,315, Texas Biomed did not adequately document the history of the procurement, specifically the reason for the contractor selection, since the contractor selected did not provide the lowest quote. We consider the expenditures related to these procurements to be questioned costs due to lack of required supporting documentation for the procurements, as noted above. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation Texas Biomed should retain written documentation for procurements, documenting the history of the procurement prior to the procurement of goods or services including, but not limited to, the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Views of responsible officials Management agrees with the finding and will implement corrective action to ensure controls are in place to retain the required written documentation for procurements.
Finding 2023-005: Procurement Federal Program: 19.124 Criteria: According to 2 CFR §200.303, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, according to 2 CFR §200.318 Procurement standards, the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A Chapter II Part 200 Subpart D 200.319 Procurement Standards. All procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and §200.320. The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with §200.320(c). According to 2 CFR §200.320 Procurement Standards, there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: 1. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); 2. The item is available only from a single source; 3. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; 4. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or 5. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined that the Center did not clearly document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, for noncompetitive procurements, there was no documentation to support which of the five criteria was met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Cause: During 2023, the Center's finance department turned over significantly, resulting in oversight of the compliance requirement. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement records were insufficient to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above, as well as the Center's internal procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: We noted one item selected for testing did not document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, we noted that the item selected for testing for noncompetitive procurements did not maintain documentation of which of the five criteria were met to allow for the noncompetitive procurement. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the Center retain sufficient procurement documentation to meet the requirements noted in the Criteria section above.
2023-001 The City’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal requirements for procurement and suspension and debarment. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027, COVID – 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Yakima County Pass-through Award/Contract Number: ARPA-1012 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2023, the City spent $1,029,238 in program funds for government services and investments in infrastructure from its direct award. The City also spent $61,560 from an award passed through from Yakima County to purchase a camera system. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Procurement Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the most restrictive federal requirements, state law or local policies by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. The City may verify this by collecting a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract or purchasing goods and services, and it must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Procurement Although the City has an established written procurement policy that includes procurement thresholds, it does not include all required methods and procedures to follow when procuring architectural and engineering services. Additionally, the City’s policy does not include other required procedures for procuring transactions, such as contracting with small and minority business owners, women’s business enterprise and labor surplus area firms, domestic preferences, recovered materials, contract cost or price analysis and more. Our audit found the City did not have adequate controls to ensure it complied with procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not follow the most restrictive requirements when using federal funds to procure an architect and engineer, public works project and equipment. The City: Used its on-call engineer for two public works projects totaling $436,017, rather than advertising for each proposal Received quotes from multiple subcontractors instead of formally procuring the police facility upgrade public works project, totaling $131,153, as one project Did not formally procure the purchase of playground equipment totaling $101,122 and camera system upgrade totaling $61,560 Suspension and Debarment Our audit found the City did not have adequate controls to verify that three of five contractors it paid more than $25,000 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider these deficiencies in internal controls to be material weaknesses, which lead to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Procurement The City had turnover in the departments responsible for procuring goods and services and updating procurement policies, and the City does not regularly receive federal audits. Although the City established a procurement policy, staff were unaware of all elements from Uniform Guidance that they should include in the policy. Without clear and complete procedures, staff misunderstood the requirements when procuring architectural and engineering services, public works, and equipment and did not follow the most restrictive requirements. Additionally, City staff were unaware that they needed to procure the camera system and believed the pass-through agency required them to use a certain contractor for the purchase. Suspension and Debarment City staff were unaware they needed to check for suspension and debarment for contractors used for the purchase of goods and services and believed they only had to check for those contractors performing public works projects. Effect of Condition Procurement Without effective internal controls, the City cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified contractors and received the best price for purchases. Additionally, the City cannot ensure it complied with federal procurement requirements. Suspension and debarment The City did not obtain written certifications from the contractors, insert a clause into the contracts or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify that three contractors it paid $203,379 using federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting. Without adequate internal controls, the City cannot ensure the contractors it paid with federal funds were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the awarding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the City: Update its procurement policies to conform with federal procurement requirements Establish internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services, public works contracts and purchases to ensure compliance with federal requirements Strengthen internal controls to ensure all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before contracting with or purchasing from them City’s Response Procurement The City of Grandview will update our procurement policies to comply with federal procurement requirements. The procurement policy update will include other required procedures for procuring transactions, such as contracting with small and minority business owners, women’s business enterprise and labor surplus area firms, domestic preferences, recovered materials, contract cost or price analysis and more. Going forward, the City will establish internal administrative controls to ensure that city staff receive the proper training and are aware of all procurement policies and guidelines. Suspension and Debarment The City of Grandview will establish internal controls on contract proposals exceeding $25,000, must be reviewed to ensure that contractors are not suspended or debarred. The City will verify this by adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred. The City will verify this before entering into a contract or purchasing goods and services, and it will maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with federal requirements. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit and acknowledge its commitment to improving the condition described. We will review the status of this issue during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and requirements for maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by non-federal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11.
2023-001 The City’s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring compliance with federal requirements for procurement and suspension and debarment. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027, COVID – 19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Yakima County Pass-through Award/Contract Number: ARPA-1012 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In 2023, the City spent $1,029,238 in program funds for government services and investments in infrastructure from its direct award. The City also spent $61,560 from an award passed through from Yakima County to purchase a camera system. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Procurement Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the most restrictive federal requirements, state law or local policies by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. The City may verify this by collecting a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration’s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract or purchasing goods and services, and it must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Procurement Although the City has an established written procurement policy that includes procurement thresholds, it does not include all required methods and procedures to follow when procuring architectural and engineering services. Additionally, the City’s policy does not include other required procedures for procuring transactions, such as contracting with small and minority business owners, women’s business enterprise and labor surplus area firms, domestic preferences, recovered materials, contract cost or price analysis and more. Our audit found the City did not have adequate controls to ensure it complied with procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not follow the most restrictive requirements when using federal funds to procure an architect and engineer, public works project and equipment. The City: Used its on-call engineer for two public works projects totaling $436,017, rather than advertising for each proposal Received quotes from multiple subcontractors instead of formally procuring the police facility upgrade public works project, totaling $131,153, as one project Did not formally procure the purchase of playground equipment totaling $101,122 and camera system upgrade totaling $61,560 Suspension and Debarment Our audit found the City did not have adequate controls to verify that three of five contractors it paid more than $25,000 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider these deficiencies in internal controls to be material weaknesses, which lead to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Procurement The City had turnover in the departments responsible for procuring goods and services and updating procurement policies, and the City does not regularly receive federal audits. Although the City established a procurement policy, staff were unaware of all elements from Uniform Guidance that they should include in the policy. Without clear and complete procedures, staff misunderstood the requirements when procuring architectural and engineering services, public works, and equipment and did not follow the most restrictive requirements. Additionally, City staff were unaware that they needed to procure the camera system and believed the pass-through agency required them to use a certain contractor for the purchase. Suspension and Debarment City staff were unaware they needed to check for suspension and debarment for contractors used for the purchase of goods and services and believed they only had to check for those contractors performing public works projects. Effect of Condition Procurement Without effective internal controls, the City cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified contractors and received the best price for purchases. Additionally, the City cannot ensure it complied with federal procurement requirements. Suspension and debarment The City did not obtain written certifications from the contractors, insert a clause into the contracts or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify that three contractors it paid $203,379 using federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting. Without adequate internal controls, the City cannot ensure the contractors it paid with federal funds were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the City used to pay contractors that were suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the awarding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the City: Update its procurement policies to conform with federal procurement requirements Establish internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services, public works contracts and purchases to ensure compliance with federal requirements Strengthen internal controls to ensure all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before contracting with or purchasing from them City’s Response Procurement The City of Grandview will update our procurement policies to comply with federal procurement requirements. The procurement policy update will include other required procedures for procuring transactions, such as contracting with small and minority business owners, women’s business enterprise and labor surplus area firms, domestic preferences, recovered materials, contract cost or price analysis and more. Going forward, the City will establish internal administrative controls to ensure that city staff receive the proper training and are aware of all procurement policies and guidelines. Suspension and Debarment The City of Grandview will establish internal controls on contract proposals exceeding $25,000, must be reviewed to ensure that contractors are not suspended or debarred. The City will verify this by adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred. The City will verify this before entering into a contract or purchasing goods and services, and it will maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with federal requirements. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit and acknowledge its commitment to improving the condition described. We will review the status of this issue during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and requirements for maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by non-federal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11.
Benton-Franklin Health District January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 2023-002 The District did not have controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S Department of Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: WA State Department of Health Pass-through Award/Contract Number: CLH31003 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide premium pay to essential workers during the pandemic, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected, and make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure. In fiscal year 2023, the District spent $305,653 to ensure culturally and linguistically responsive testing, investigation and contract tracing resources to limit the spread of COVID-19. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. When using federal funds to purchase services, governments must follow their own documented procurement procedures that reflect the most restrictive of federal, state or local requirements, and apply them by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. A local government may use noncompetitive procurement procedures when certain circumstances apply, such as if an item is only available from a single source, a public emergency or when the awarding agency expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request. In those circumstances, the local government must evaluate each procurement action individually and document its rationale for waiving competition. Our audit found the District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the District did not follow its policy to obtain quotes or have documentation to support noncompetitive procurement for these purchased services. We consider this deficiency in internal control to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition Management and staff were unaware they needed to follow the District’s policy to procure purchased services. Instead, the District relied on the governor’s emergency declarations due to the COVID-19 pandemic to waive competitive procedures. Effect of Condition The District paid one vendor $69,448 in federal program funds without competitively procuring or documenting its evaluation and rationale for using a noncompetitive process. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, received the best price or most qualified vendor and complied with federal procurement requirements and its own policy. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls to ensure it procures goods and services in accordance with federal procurement requirements and its own procurement policies and procedures. District’s Response The District agrees with the recommendation from the State Auditor’s Office to strengthen internal controls to ensure the procurement policy is followed. The District will update its current procurement policy to include emergency procurement procedures, including the requirement for documentation of rationale if waiving competition during an emergency. The revised policy will conform with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.318-327) and follows state/federal laws. The District will train staff to ensure the policy is followed for future goods and services. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring goods and services, including noncompetitive procurement.
Finding 2023-001 – Internal control deficiency and noncompliance over Procurement. Identification of the federal program: Assistance Listing Number 93.738: • PPHF: Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Program financed solely by Public Prevention and Health Funds • COVID-19 – PPHF: Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health Program financed solely by Public Prevention and Health Funds • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Federal Award Identification Number – NU58DP006604 • Federal Award Year – September 30, 2018 to September 29, 2023 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.303 – Internal controls. The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318(i) – General procurement standards. The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (c) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Condition: Management did not have effective internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Management did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or potential effect: Small purchase procurements and noncompetitive procurements were not supported by effective internal controls and could potentially include unreasonable prices or rates. Questioned costs: $43,694 – Assistance Listing Number 93.738, Award Identification Number – NU58DP006604 Questioned costs were computed by taking the total small purchase procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation of $43,694. Context: During our testing over small purchase procurements, we obtained a listing of small purchase procurements and selected a sample of 6 which represented the entire population. The total value of the small purchase procurements was $236,269. There were 2 ($43,694) out of 6 ($236,269) selections where management did not maintain records for procurements sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend management develop and implement effective internal controls to ensure the compliance requirements over procurements are performed. In addition, management should review the items identified as questioned costs to identify if any improper payments were made to the entity. Views of responsible officials: This finding was due to two process failures. The first relates to a lack of adequate documentation whereby PHS entered into a contract with the New Mexico Department of Health to provide services under the REACH immunization program as a sole source procurement. The allowability of this cost is not in question. The scope of work was presented to and approved by the CDC before the procurement was initiated. However, the justification for use of the New Mexico Department of Health as a sole source contractor was not adequately documented. The second failure was due to a lack of awareness and ineffective communication regarding the applicability of Federal procurement requirements to certain advertising services procured for the REACH immunization program. This breakdown occurred as the PHS Communications and Brand Management Department coordinating the procurement of the services does not typically engage with Federally funded projects and was not made aware of the applicable requirements by the Community Health department who had received the funding and was requesting the services. The realization that advertising needs for the REACH immunization project would exceed the micro purchase threshold and trigger the need for a different process for the Communications department was overlooked and not communicated effectively. The advertising costs included in this finding are allowable. The finding occurred because the costs exceeded the micro purchase threshold and were not competitively bid. Presbyterian agrees that the lack of awareness in this situation created a scenario where the required efforts and documentation necessary to justify a sole source procurement were not met. It should be noted, however, that Presbyterian has awareness of the procurement requirements in the code of federal regulations governing such matters and strives to be compliant with those requirements. This is evidenced by the following: • A robust policy governing procurements under federal awards that aligns with the procurement requirements within 2 CFR 200. • Annual required training for all Leaders (Directors and above) that includes risks associated with grant funding and incorporates a link to the federal procurement policy. • A Federal Conflict of Interest policy to mitigate and remediate conflicts of interest that would be associated with procurements under federal awards. • A rigorous process to ensure compliance with subaward and contractual agreements. • No fraud has ever been detected or suspected with any of Presbyterian’s federal awards. • Internal processes in place to approve purchases made directly by programs with grant funding. • Monthly transactions reviews performed to confirm appropriateness and identification of any necessary corrections prior to closing the accounting period as well as budget to actual tracking. Presbyterian acknowledges that despite the processes and policies listed above, additional education and ongoing training and communication of Federal procurement requirements are necessary to mitigate future procurement issues. Presbyterian believes that enhancing training, education and communication as well as process revisions and written procedures will effectively mitigate this risk. A corrective action plan has been developed that will focus on four specific areas: 1) Communication & Awareness of process failures that led to the finding. 2) Training & Education, broadly at an enterprise level and targeted to areas engaged in federal funding. 3) Written Procedures and Toolkits to facilitate actions that result in compliant procurements under Federal funding and updates to the existing policy governing procurements under Federal funding to clarify the responsibilities for communication of applicability of Federal procurement requirements. 4) Collaboration with the Communications department to ensure processes exist to support competitive bids for advertising services as needed.
2023-002: U.S. Department of Environment Protection – Assistance Listing # 66.468 Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Cluster) Lack of Required Written Policies & Procedures – Compliance Condition & Criteria: The Authority does not currently have all the written policies and procedures in place as required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to financial management and determining allowability of costs for the federal program (Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302 & 200.305). In addition CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320 require there to be written policies and procedures regarding procurement and conflicts of interest. Effect: Although not likely, the oversight agency could disallow all costs associated with this program. Cause: The Authority has not had any significant federal grant funding in many years. The current federal project is the first time that the Authority has been subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. The Authority does have a set of informal policies and procedures that are followed as it relates to financial management, allowability of costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest, and have been very careful to carry out all federal program activities in accordance with established regulations; however, the Authority was not aware that the Uniform Guidance requires these policies and procedures be documented in writing. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority work towards getting those policies and procedures documented in writing so that they are in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Authority understands the potential effects of the condition described above and is currently consulting with their attorney to draft written policies and procedures as they relate to federal programs that are required by the Uniform Guidance.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 11.463, U.S. Department of Commerce, Habitat Conservation, Implementing Priority Fish Habitat Restoration Projects of GLFC Lake Committees Federal Award Identification Number and Year NA22NMF4630144 Pass through Entity Great Lakes Fishieries Commission Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Entities should have controls in place to ensure that entities they plan to enter into a covered transaction with are not suspended or debarred, as identified in 2 CFR 200.212 and 200.318. Condition Controls in place were not adequate to ensure support for suspension and debarment check was retained. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Context During procurement testing, we identified one contract where support for suspension and debarment check was not able to be provided. Cause and Effect The Authority did not retain their suspension and debarment check. As a result, the Authority was not able to provide proper supporting documentation that they complied with checking SAM.gov for contract entered into. Recommendation We recommend the Authority put controls in place to ensure support for suspension and debarment checks are retained in contractor files. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Authority will put controls in place to require the retention of support for suspension and debarment checks.
Skamania County January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The County did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STRP-30MR-(001) / STPR-HIPR-2030-(007) / BHOS-2030(008) / STBGR-30A3(001) / STBGR-2030(009) / HISP-000S(639) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition During fiscal year 2023, the County spent $1,037,422 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the County’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the County did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management and staff were unaware the County was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Effect of Condition Although the County did not establish its own written policy and procedures before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding engineering and public works contracts. However, without these written policies and procedures, the County is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the County establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. County’s Response The County has already begun putting together an informal bidding policy and procedure document that will include a federal procurement section. Once the policy is in place, it will be distributed to all departments for their use. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the County for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the County’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
Skamania County January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The County did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STRP-30MR-(001) / STPR-HIPR-2030-(007) / BHOS-2030(008) / STBGR-30A3(001) / STBGR-2030(009) / HISP-000S(639) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition During fiscal year 2023, the County spent $1,037,422 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the County’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the County did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management and staff were unaware the County was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Effect of Condition Although the County did not establish its own written policy and procedures before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding engineering and public works contracts. However, without these written policies and procedures, the County is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the County establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. County’s Response The County has already begun putting together an informal bidding policy and procedure document that will include a federal procurement section. Once the policy is in place, it will be distributed to all departments for their use. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the County for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the County’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
Skamania County January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The County did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STRP-30MR-(001) / STPR-HIPR-2030-(007) / BHOS-2030(008) / STBGR-30A3(001) / STBGR-2030(009) / HISP-000S(639) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition During fiscal year 2023, the County spent $1,037,422 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the County’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the County did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management and staff were unaware the County was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Effect of Condition Although the County did not establish its own written policy and procedures before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding engineering and public works contracts. However, without these written policies and procedures, the County is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the County establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. County’s Response The County has already begun putting together an informal bidding policy and procedure document that will include a federal procurement section. Once the policy is in place, it will be distributed to all departments for their use. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the County for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the County’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
Skamania County January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The County did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STRP-30MR-(001) / STPR-HIPR-2030-(007) / BHOS-2030(008) / STBGR-30A3(001) / STBGR-2030(009) / HISP-000S(639) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition During fiscal year 2023, the County spent $1,037,422 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the County’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the County did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management and staff were unaware the County was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Effect of Condition Although the County did not establish its own written policy and procedures before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding engineering and public works contracts. However, without these written policies and procedures, the County is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the County establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. County’s Response The County has already begun putting together an informal bidding policy and procedure document that will include a federal procurement section. Once the policy is in place, it will be distributed to all departments for their use. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the County for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the County’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
Skamania County January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The County did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STRP-30MR-(001) / STPR-HIPR-2030-(007) / BHOS-2030(008) / STBGR-30A3(001) / STBGR-2030(009) / HISP-000S(639) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition During fiscal year 2023, the County spent $1,037,422 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the County’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the County did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management and staff were unaware the County was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Effect of Condition Although the County did not establish its own written policy and procedures before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding engineering and public works contracts. However, without these written policies and procedures, the County is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the County establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. County’s Response The County has already begun putting together an informal bidding policy and procedure document that will include a federal procurement section. Once the policy is in place, it will be distributed to all departments for their use. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the County for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the County’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
Skamania County January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023 2023-001 The County did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STRP-30MR-(001) / STPR-HIPR-2030-(007) / BHOS-2030(008) / STBGR-30A3(001) / STBGR-2030(009) / HISP-000S(639) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Description of Condition During fiscal year 2023, the County spent $1,037,422 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the County’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the County did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management and staff were unaware the County was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Effect of Condition Although the County did not establish its own written policy and procedures before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding engineering and public works contracts. However, without these written policies and procedures, the County is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the County establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. County’s Response The County has already begun putting together an informal bidding policy and procedure document that will include a federal procurement section. Once the policy is in place, it will be distributed to all departments for their use. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the County for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it is taking to address these concerns. We will review the status of the County’s corrective action during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Cluster - Procurement Federal Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listings Number: 66.468 Federal Award Number (or Other Identifying Number): DW22168902 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micropurchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The Town did not obtain price or rate quotes for the two vendors identified and tested that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. The micro-purchase threshold may be increased, but the Town did not provide documentation that the threshold had been increased. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, which must include the reason for the procurement method used, was not available for audit. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 TOWN OF CAMBRIDGE CITY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Cause The Town was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. The Town noted they were unaware professional services agreements for consultants were required to follow small purchase procurement guidelines. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the Town could not demonstrate it had obtained an adequate number of price or rate quotations prior to selecting a vendor. Therefore, the Town could have overpaid for the services obtained. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommend that management of the Town strengthen its system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for small purchases. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report. INDIANA STATE
Program Name - Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Federal I.D. Number - 10.760 Federal Agency - U.S. Department of Agriculture Type of Finding - Noncompliance of the Provisions of the Uniform Guidance Condition: The Village does not have written policies and procedures to follow for procuring goods or services or written standards of conduct to follow when procuring those goods or services. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires all auditees to have written policies and procedures for procuring goods and services and written standards of conduct to follow when procuring those goods and services as stated in 2 CFR Part 200.318. Effect: Not having written policies and procedures to follow when procuring goods or services and not having standards of conduct to follow when procuring those goods or services could result in unallowed costs charged to a federal program. Cause: The Village has never been required to have a Single Audit and was not aware of the requirement to have written policies and procedures for procuring goods and services and written stanards of conduct to follow when procuring those goods or services. Auditor's Recommendation: This circumstance is not unusual in a small entity which has never been required to have a Single Audit. We recommend that the Village Board implement written policies and procedures for prouring goods and services and standards of conduct for employees to follow when procuring those goods and services. Management's Response: See management's corrective action plan on page 55.
Condition: The Organization has a procurement policy; however, the policy does not include all the elements required by the Uniform Guidance (UG). The policy should detail, among other items, thresholds and procedures for each of the five procurement methods. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326 outlines the procurement standards and the elements that should be included in the Organization’s policy. Cause: Historically, the Organization has not received a significant amount of federal grants, and therefore, the current procurement policy has not recently reviewed to ensure it complies with the elements required by the UG. Effect: The effect is unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update its procurement policy with all the elements required by the UG. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the recommendation. The procurement policy was updated in August 2024 with all the elements required by the UG.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition and context: During testing of Moonshot Mission’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified one vendor Moonshot Missions did not have all the needed documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Effect: Moonshot missions was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that Moonshot Missions review its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition and context: During testing of Moonshot Mission’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified one vendor Moonshot Missions did not have all the needed documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Effect: Moonshot missions was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that Moonshot Missions review its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition and context: During testing of Moonshot Mission’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified one vendor Moonshot Missions did not have all the needed documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Effect: Moonshot missions was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that Moonshot Missions review its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition and context: During testing of Moonshot Mission’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified one vendor Moonshot Missions did not have all the needed documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Effect: Moonshot missions was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that Moonshot Missions review its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition and context: During testing of Moonshot Mission’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified one vendor Moonshot Missions did not have all the needed documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Effect: Moonshot missions was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that Moonshot Missions review its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required documentation is retained and available. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.