FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities - Procurement The School Corporation made purchases from two and three vendors during fiscal years 2022- 2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation could not provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurements provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. Additionally, the history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. The School Corporation made purchases from five and four vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the micro-purchase threshold. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented for any of the vendors. Control Activities - Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation utilized two vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 for which purchases throughout the year exceeded $25,000. The School Corporation was unable to provide any evidence that they verified that the vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or service required under a federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Micro-purchases — (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in § 200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the small size and location of the School Corporation were the determining factors when making purchasing decisions as many vendors will not service the School Corporation. Therefore, the School Corporation has used the same vendors for many years. As such, the School Corporation did not follow the proper procurement procedures to document the reason that competition was limited. Accordingly, the School Corporation also did not check the vendors' suspension and debarment status. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Furthermore, by not properly completing the procurement process the School Corporation could have overpaid goods or services. Additionally, the School Corporation could have made payment to a vendor that was suspended or debarred. Payments to a suspended or debarred vendor are unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, we recommend that the School Corporation's management verify applicable vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities - Procurement The School Corporation made purchases from two and three vendors during fiscal years 2022- 2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation could not provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurements provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. Additionally, the history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. The School Corporation made purchases from five and four vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the micro-purchase threshold. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented for any of the vendors. Control Activities - Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation utilized two vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 for which purchases throughout the year exceeded $25,000. The School Corporation was unable to provide any evidence that they verified that the vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or service required under a federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Micro-purchases — (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in § 200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the small size and location of the School Corporation were the determining factors when making purchasing decisions as many vendors will not service the School Corporation. Therefore, the School Corporation has used the same vendors for many years. As such, the School Corporation did not follow the proper procurement procedures to document the reason that competition was limited. Accordingly, the School Corporation also did not check the vendors' suspension and debarment status. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Furthermore, by not properly completing the procurement process the School Corporation could have overpaid goods or services. Additionally, the School Corporation could have made payment to a vendor that was suspended or debarred. Payments to a suspended or debarred vendor are unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, we recommend that the School Corporation's management verify applicable vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities - Procurement The School Corporation made purchases from two and three vendors during fiscal years 2022- 2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation could not provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurements provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. Additionally, the history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. The School Corporation made purchases from five and four vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the micro-purchase threshold. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented for any of the vendors. Control Activities - Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation utilized two vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 for which purchases throughout the year exceeded $25,000. The School Corporation was unable to provide any evidence that they verified that the vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or service required under a federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Micro-purchases — (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in § 200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the small size and location of the School Corporation were the determining factors when making purchasing decisions as many vendors will not service the School Corporation. Therefore, the School Corporation has used the same vendors for many years. As such, the School Corporation did not follow the proper procurement procedures to document the reason that competition was limited. Accordingly, the School Corporation also did not check the vendors' suspension and debarment status. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Furthermore, by not properly completing the procurement process the School Corporation could have overpaid goods or services. Additionally, the School Corporation could have made payment to a vendor that was suspended or debarred. Payments to a suspended or debarred vendor are unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, we recommend that the School Corporation's management verify applicable vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities - Procurement The School Corporation made purchases from two and three vendors during fiscal years 2022- 2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation could not provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurements provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. Additionally, the history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. The School Corporation made purchases from five and four vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the micro-purchase threshold. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented for any of the vendors. Control Activities - Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation utilized two vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 for which purchases throughout the year exceeded $25,000. The School Corporation was unable to provide any evidence that they verified that the vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or service required under a federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Micro-purchases — (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in § 200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the small size and location of the School Corporation were the determining factors when making purchasing decisions as many vendors will not service the School Corporation. Therefore, the School Corporation has used the same vendors for many years. As such, the School Corporation did not follow the proper procurement procedures to document the reason that competition was limited. Accordingly, the School Corporation also did not check the vendors' suspension and debarment status. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Furthermore, by not properly completing the procurement process the School Corporation could have overpaid goods or services. Additionally, the School Corporation could have made payment to a vendor that was suspended or debarred. Payments to a suspended or debarred vendor are unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, we recommend that the School Corporation's management verify applicable vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-005 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Special Milk Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10556 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the objectives of an entity will be achieved. With respect to federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal controls over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the federal awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not one event or circumstance, but a dynamic and iterative process. The internal control process is based on fundamental principles that operate as a whole but are best understood when analyzed individually. The fundamental principles are related to five components of internal control which are as follows: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. If a component is not effective, or the components are not operating together in an integrated manner, then an internal control system cannot be effective. Deficiencies as noted below were identified in the risk assessment, monitoring, and control activities components. Risk Assessment The School Corporation has not established a formal risk assessment process. There is no documented risk assessment policy, nor is there evidence of periodic risk identification, analysis, or evaluation. Monitoring The School Corporation did not conduct ongoing or periodic reviews to ensure that internal controls were operating as intended and to identify areas for improvement. Furthermore, the School Corporation did not have a process to follow up on corrective actions written as a response to audit findings. Control Activities - Procurement The School Corporation made purchases from two and three vendors during fiscal years 2022- 2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the small purchase threshold. The School Corporation could not provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurements provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. Additionally, the history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. The School Corporation made purchases from five and four vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, respectively, for which expenditures fell under the micro-purchase threshold. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented for any of the vendors. Control Activities - Suspension and Debarment The School Corporation utilized two vendors during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 for which purchases throughout the year exceeded $25,000. The School Corporation was unable to provide any evidence that they verified that the vendors were not suspended or debarred from participation in federal programs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 26 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or service required under a federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (1) Micro-purchases — (i) Distribution. The acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (See the definition of micro-purchase in § 200.1). To the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal entity should distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. (ii) Micro-purchase awards. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. Purchase cards can be used for micropurchases if procedures are documented and approved by the non-Federal entity. . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 27 CANNELTON CITY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions, or (b) Collecting a certification from that person, or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause Management of the School Corporation had not taken steps to design and implement policies and procedures to assess risks facing the School Corporation or to establish and operate monitoring activities that monitor the internal control system. Additionally, the small size and location of the School Corporation were the determining factors when making purchasing decisions as many vendors will not service the School Corporation. Therefore, the School Corporation has used the same vendors for many years. As such, the School Corporation did not follow the proper procurement procedures to document the reason that competition was limited. Accordingly, the School Corporation also did not check the vendors' suspension and debarment status. Effect As a result of the five components of internal control not being adequately designed and implemented, the internal control system cannot be effective. Thus, general risks or specific risks from fraud and significant changes could negatively impact the School Corporation, identified internal control deficiencies could continue, and unidentified flaws within the internal control system could exist. Furthermore, by not properly completing the procurement process the School Corporation could have overpaid goods or services. Additionally, the School Corporation could have made payment to a vendor that was suspended or debarred. Payments to a suspended or debarred vendor are unallowable. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to risk assessment and monitoring. Additionally, we recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Additionally, we recommend that the School Corporation's management verify applicable vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to making payment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 23, FY 24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from multiple vendors for its audit period contract with Coca-Cola. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, including rationale to limit competition at the time of purchase was not provided for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds over certain thresholds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. There was one vendor (Coca-Cola) subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period that was not procured through the School Corporation's affiliated Educational Services Center for cooperative purchasing. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to one vendor (and related purchases) for both procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. (c) The purchasing agent shall mail an invitation to quote to the persons described in subsection (b) at least seven (7) days before the time fixed for receiving quotes. (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Superintendent of Schools indicated that alternative vendor(s) had left the local geographical area and no longer attempted to submit quotes or bids for services as it had done in prior years. Additionally, School Corporation officials were unaware of the requirement to verify that all vendors over $25,000 were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funds. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls over small purchase requirements to ensure that an adequate number price or rate quotes are obtained before purchase. Additionally, we recommended that vendors with a single or aggregate transaction amounts over $25,000 per fiscal year are verified for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction and/or contract. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 23, FY 24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from multiple vendors for its audit period contract with Coca-Cola. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, including rationale to limit competition at the time of purchase was not provided for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds over certain thresholds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. There was one vendor (Coca-Cola) subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period that was not procured through the School Corporation's affiliated Educational Services Center for cooperative purchasing. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to one vendor (and related purchases) for both procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. (c) The purchasing agent shall mail an invitation to quote to the persons described in subsection (b) at least seven (7) days before the time fixed for receiving quotes. (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Superintendent of Schools indicated that alternative vendor(s) had left the local geographical area and no longer attempted to submit quotes or bids for services as it had done in prior years. Additionally, School Corporation officials were unaware of the requirement to verify that all vendors over $25,000 were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funds. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls over small purchase requirements to ensure that an adequate number price or rate quotes are obtained before purchase. Additionally, we recommended that vendors with a single or aggregate transaction amounts over $25,000 per fiscal year are verified for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction and/or contract. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 23, FY 24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from multiple vendors for its audit period contract with Coca-Cola. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, including rationale to limit competition at the time of purchase was not provided for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds over certain thresholds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. There was one vendor (Coca-Cola) subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period that was not procured through the School Corporation's affiliated Educational Services Center for cooperative purchasing. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to one vendor (and related purchases) for both procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. (c) The purchasing agent shall mail an invitation to quote to the persons described in subsection (b) at least seven (7) days before the time fixed for receiving quotes. (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Superintendent of Schools indicated that alternative vendor(s) had left the local geographical area and no longer attempted to submit quotes or bids for services as it had done in prior years. Additionally, School Corporation officials were unaware of the requirement to verify that all vendors over $25,000 were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funds. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls over small purchase requirements to ensure that an adequate number price or rate quotes are obtained before purchase. Additionally, we recommended that vendors with a single or aggregate transaction amounts over $25,000 per fiscal year are verified for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction and/or contract. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 23, FY 24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from multiple vendors for its audit period contract with Coca-Cola. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, including rationale to limit competition at the time of purchase was not provided for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds over certain thresholds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. There was one vendor (Coca-Cola) subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period that was not procured through the School Corporation's affiliated Educational Services Center for cooperative purchasing. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to one vendor (and related purchases) for both procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. (c) The purchasing agent shall mail an invitation to quote to the persons described in subsection (b) at least seven (7) days before the time fixed for receiving quotes. (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Superintendent of Schools indicated that alternative vendor(s) had left the local geographical area and no longer attempted to submit quotes or bids for services as it had done in prior years. Additionally, School Corporation officials were unaware of the requirement to verify that all vendors over $25,000 were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funds. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls over small purchase requirements to ensure that an adequate number price or rate quotes are obtained before purchase. Additionally, we recommended that vendors with a single or aggregate transaction amounts over $25,000 per fiscal year are verified for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction and/or contract. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 23, FY 24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from multiple vendors for its audit period contract with Coca-Cola. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, including rationale to limit competition at the time of purchase was not provided for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds over certain thresholds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. There was one vendor (Coca-Cola) subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period that was not procured through the School Corporation's affiliated Educational Services Center for cooperative purchasing. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to one vendor (and related purchases) for both procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. (c) The purchasing agent shall mail an invitation to quote to the persons described in subsection (b) at least seven (7) days before the time fixed for receiving quotes. (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Superintendent of Schools indicated that alternative vendor(s) had left the local geographical area and no longer attempted to submit quotes or bids for services as it had done in prior years. Additionally, School Corporation officials were unaware of the requirement to verify that all vendors over $25,000 were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funds. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls over small purchase requirements to ensure that an adequate number price or rate quotes are obtained before purchase. Additionally, we recommended that vendors with a single or aggregate transaction amounts over $25,000 per fiscal year are verified for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction and/or contract. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-003 Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listings Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 23, FY 24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-003. Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $150,000 per Indiana Code. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases of $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchases were followed. The School Corporation did not obtain price or rate quotes from multiple vendors for its audit period contract with Coca-Cola. Documentation detailing the history of procurement, including rationale to limit competition at the time of purchase was not provided for audit. Suspension and Debarment Nonfederal entities and contractors are subject to nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or are ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. This is done by checking SAM Exclusions, collecting a certification from that entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity. The School Corporation had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that applicable vendors who received federal funds over certain thresholds were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal awards programs. There was one vendor (Coca-Cola) subject to suspension and debarment requirements during the audit period that was not procured through the School Corporation's affiliated Educational Services Center for cooperative purchasing. The School Corporation did not perform procedures to ensure the vendor was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from or eligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Noncompliance was isolated to one vendor (and related purchases) for both procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." Indiana Code 5-22-8-3 states in part: "(a) This section applies only if the purchasing agent expects the purchase to be: (1) at least fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and (2) not more than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). . . . (b) A purchasing agent may purchase supplies under this section by inviting quotes from at least three (3) persons known to deal in the lines or classes of supplies to be purchased. (c) The purchasing agent shall mail an invitation to quote to the persons described in subsection (b) at least seven (7) days before the time fixed for receiving quotes. (d) If the purchasing agent receives a satisfactory quote, the purchasing agent shall award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive offeror for each line or class of supplies required." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The Superintendent of Schools indicated that alternative vendor(s) had left the local geographical area and no longer attempted to submit quotes or bids for services as it had done in prior years. Additionally, School Corporation officials were unaware of the requirement to verify that all vendors over $25,000 were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funds. Effect The lack of an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to occur and remain undetected. Noncompliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement could enable small purchases made by the School Corporation to be uncompetitive and could lead to contracting with vendors who are suspended or debarred from receiving federal grant funding. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation's management strengthen its system of internal controls over small purchase requirements to ensure that an adequate number price or rate quotes are obtained before purchase. Additionally, we recommended that vendors with a single or aggregate transaction amounts over $25,000 per fiscal year are verified for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction and/or contract. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027; Direct Allocation, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CAPITALIZATION GRANTS FOR CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 66.458 Criteria: The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Further, per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, cities must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. Condition: The City did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the programs. Cause: The City does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027. Criteria: The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Further, per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, cities must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. Condition: The City did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the programs. Cause: The City does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027. Criteria: The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Further, per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, cities must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. Condition: The City did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the programs. Cause: The City does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027. Criteria: The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Further, per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, cities must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. Condition: The City did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the programs. Cause: The City does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027. Criteria: The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Further, per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, cities must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. Condition: The City did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the programs. Cause: The City does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-123-PN01, 23611-0123-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The total amount disbursed for the sample items was $114,123 in FY23 and $13,404 in FY24 for contracted rehabilitation therapy and speech pathology services. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment checks on the sample vendors. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-123-PN01, 23611-0123-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the three small purchase method procurements sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The total amount disbursed for the sample items was $114,123 in FY23 and $13,404 in FY24 for contracted rehabilitation therapy and speech pathology services. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment checks on the sample vendors. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement vendors utilized and not procured by the School Corporation’s purchasing cooperative. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could place the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the federal program and applicable federal/state procurement regulations. Not adhering to the School Corporation’s procurement policy designed to follow federal and state regulations, could result in the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds by conducting business with vendors not properly procured and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in the Region 8 Education Service Center Cooperative which procures vendors for many food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation contracted with vendors outside of the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $200,000 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the simplified acquisition purchase threshold (greater than $150,000) but was subjected to small purchase acquisition instead of the policy to perform a formal procurement consisting of a request for proposal (RFP) that is publicly advertised. Suspension and Debarment For two vendors tested which were not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks to confirm the vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract or disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement an internal control to monitor purchases within the Food Service Department with vendors that exceed the simplified acquisition dollar threshold, either individually or in annual aggregation, to ensure the School Corporation’s procurement policy is followed which includes advertising a formal request for proposal (RFP) and performing a full procurement process for purchases with vendors exceeding $150,000. We also recommend that the School Corporation implement an internal control process to monitor aggregate vendor disbursements in Fund 800, School Lunch, on annual basis and perform suspension and debarment checks for all vendors exceeding $25,000 in aggregate disbursements on an annual basis to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement vendors utilized and not procured by the School Corporation’s purchasing cooperative. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could place the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the federal program and applicable federal/state procurement regulations. Not adhering to the School Corporation’s procurement policy designed to follow federal and state regulations, could result in the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds by conducting business with vendors not properly procured and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in the Region 8 Education Service Center Cooperative which procures vendors for many food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation contracted with vendors outside of the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $200,000 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the simplified acquisition purchase threshold (greater than $150,000) but was subjected to small purchase acquisition instead of the policy to perform a formal procurement consisting of a request for proposal (RFP) that is publicly advertised. Suspension and Debarment For two vendors tested which were not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks to confirm the vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract or disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement an internal control to monitor purchases within the Food Service Department with vendors that exceed the simplified acquisition dollar threshold, either individually or in annual aggregation, to ensure the School Corporation’s procurement policy is followed which includes advertising a formal request for proposal (RFP) and performing a full procurement process for purchases with vendors exceeding $150,000. We also recommend that the School Corporation implement an internal control process to monitor aggregate vendor disbursements in Fund 800, School Lunch, on annual basis and perform suspension and debarment checks for all vendors exceeding $25,000 in aggregate disbursements on an annual basis to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement vendors utilized and not procured by the School Corporation’s purchasing cooperative. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could place the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the federal program and applicable federal/state procurement regulations. Not adhering to the School Corporation’s procurement policy designed to follow federal and state regulations, could result in the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds by conducting business with vendors not properly procured and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in the Region 8 Education Service Center Cooperative which procures vendors for many food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation contracted with vendors outside of the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $200,000 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the simplified acquisition purchase threshold (greater than $150,000) but was subjected to small purchase acquisition instead of the policy to perform a formal procurement consisting of a request for proposal (RFP) that is publicly advertised. Suspension and Debarment For two vendors tested which were not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks to confirm the vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract or disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement an internal control to monitor purchases within the Food Service Department with vendors that exceed the simplified acquisition dollar threshold, either individually or in annual aggregation, to ensure the School Corporation’s procurement policy is followed which includes advertising a formal request for proposal (RFP) and performing a full procurement process for purchases with vendors exceeding $150,000. We also recommend that the School Corporation implement an internal control process to monitor aggregate vendor disbursements in Fund 800, School Lunch, on annual basis and perform suspension and debarment checks for all vendors exceeding $25,000 in aggregate disbursements on an annual basis to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.318 states: “The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 200.317 through 200.327.” and 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Cluster and Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation’s management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement vendors utilized and not procured by the School Corporation’s purchasing cooperative. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system could place the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the federal program and applicable federal/state procurement regulations. Not adhering to the School Corporation’s procurement policy designed to follow federal and state regulations, could result in the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds by conducting business with vendors not properly procured and verified to not be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: There we no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in the Region 8 Education Service Center Cooperative which procures vendors for many food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation contracted with vendors outside of the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $200,000 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the simplified acquisition purchase threshold (greater than $150,000) but was subjected to small purchase acquisition instead of the policy to perform a formal procurement consisting of a request for proposal (RFP) that is publicly advertised. Suspension and Debarment For two vendors tested which were not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not perform suspension and debarment checks to confirm the vendors were not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract or disbursing federal funds. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement an internal control to monitor purchases within the Food Service Department with vendors that exceed the simplified acquisition dollar threshold, either individually or in annual aggregation, to ensure the School Corporation’s procurement policy is followed which includes advertising a formal request for proposal (RFP) and performing a full procurement process for purchases with vendors exceeding $150,000. We also recommend that the School Corporation implement an internal control process to monitor aggregate vendor disbursements in Fund 800, School Lunch, on annual basis and perform suspension and debarment checks for all vendors exceeding $25,000 in aggregate disbursements on an annual basis to ensure compliance with federal suspension and debarment regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Federal Agencies: US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of Energy (DOE), US Health & Human Services (HHS) Program Names: Research & Development Cluster: Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI); Office of Science Financial Assistance Program; Fossil Energy Research and Development; Alcohol Research Programs; Cardiovascular Diseases Research; Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research; Vision Research ALN #s: 10.310; 81.049; 81.089; 93.273; 93.837; 93.846; and 93.867 Award Numbers: AG NIFA 2021-68012-35898; DOE DE-SC0018420; DOE DE-FE0032049; SNAP 5P50AA022538 10; SNAP 5R01HL152692-04; Snp 5R01AR081448-02; and NEI 5 P30 EY001792-45 Questioned Costs: None 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method in the Research and Development Cluster. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Within the iBuy system, when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected, a radio button allows for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection is made, additional information supporting this rationale should be available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method is appropriate. We noted instances where there was not evidence that this information was available to the reviewer at the time of the approval. Out of twenty-nine small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, for five transactions (17%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Out of eleven small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Chicago, for six transactions (55%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive procurement methods selected were inappropriate. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement (Continued) Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. The electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button, but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: Accepted. While the University agrees that the supporting documentation was not captured in the electronic payment system, the rationale was available in other University records. The University will take steps to address the recommendation in this finding.
Federal Agencies: US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of Energy (DOE), US Health & Human Services (HHS) Program Names: Research & Development Cluster: Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI); Office of Science Financial Assistance Program; Fossil Energy Research and Development; Alcohol Research Programs; Cardiovascular Diseases Research; Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research; Vision Research ALN #s: 10.310; 81.049; 81.089; 93.273; 93.837; 93.846; and 93.867 Award Numbers: AG NIFA 2021-68012-35898; DOE DE-SC0018420; DOE DE-FE0032049; SNAP 5P50AA022538 10; SNAP 5R01HL152692-04; Snp 5R01AR081448-02; and NEI 5 P30 EY001792-45 Questioned Costs: None 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method in the Research and Development Cluster. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Within the iBuy system, when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected, a radio button allows for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection is made, additional information supporting this rationale should be available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method is appropriate. We noted instances where there was not evidence that this information was available to the reviewer at the time of the approval. Out of twenty-nine small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, for five transactions (17%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Out of eleven small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Chicago, for six transactions (55%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive procurement methods selected were inappropriate. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement (Continued) Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. The electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button, but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: Accepted. While the University agrees that the supporting documentation was not captured in the electronic payment system, the rationale was available in other University records. The University will take steps to address the recommendation in this finding.
Federal Agencies: US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of Energy (DOE), US Health & Human Services (HHS) Program Names: Research & Development Cluster: Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI); Office of Science Financial Assistance Program; Fossil Energy Research and Development; Alcohol Research Programs; Cardiovascular Diseases Research; Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research; Vision Research ALN #s: 10.310; 81.049; 81.089; 93.273; 93.837; 93.846; and 93.867 Award Numbers: AG NIFA 2021-68012-35898; DOE DE-SC0018420; DOE DE-FE0032049; SNAP 5P50AA022538 10; SNAP 5R01HL152692-04; Snp 5R01AR081448-02; and NEI 5 P30 EY001792-45 Questioned Costs: None 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method in the Research and Development Cluster. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Within the iBuy system, when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected, a radio button allows for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection is made, additional information supporting this rationale should be available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method is appropriate. We noted instances where there was not evidence that this information was available to the reviewer at the time of the approval. Out of twenty-nine small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, for five transactions (17%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Out of eleven small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Chicago, for six transactions (55%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive procurement methods selected were inappropriate. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement (Continued) Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. The electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button, but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: Accepted. While the University agrees that the supporting documentation was not captured in the electronic payment system, the rationale was available in other University records. The University will take steps to address the recommendation in this finding.
Federal Agencies: US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of Energy (DOE), US Health & Human Services (HHS) Program Names: Research & Development Cluster: Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI); Office of Science Financial Assistance Program; Fossil Energy Research and Development; Alcohol Research Programs; Cardiovascular Diseases Research; Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research; Vision Research ALN #s: 10.310; 81.049; 81.089; 93.273; 93.837; 93.846; and 93.867 Award Numbers: AG NIFA 2021-68012-35898; DOE DE-SC0018420; DOE DE-FE0032049; SNAP 5P50AA022538 10; SNAP 5R01HL152692-04; Snp 5R01AR081448-02; and NEI 5 P30 EY001792-45 Questioned Costs: None 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method in the Research and Development Cluster. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Within the iBuy system, when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected, a radio button allows for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection is made, additional information supporting this rationale should be available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method is appropriate. We noted instances where there was not evidence that this information was available to the reviewer at the time of the approval. Out of twenty-nine small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, for five transactions (17%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Out of eleven small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Chicago, for six transactions (55%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive procurement methods selected were inappropriate. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement (Continued) Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. The electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button, but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: Accepted. While the University agrees that the supporting documentation was not captured in the electronic payment system, the rationale was available in other University records. The University will take steps to address the recommendation in this finding.
Federal Agencies: US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of Energy (DOE), US Health & Human Services (HHS) Program Names: Research & Development Cluster: Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI); Office of Science Financial Assistance Program; Fossil Energy Research and Development; Alcohol Research Programs; Cardiovascular Diseases Research; Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research; Vision Research ALN #s: 10.310; 81.049; 81.089; 93.273; 93.837; 93.846; and 93.867 Award Numbers: AG NIFA 2021-68012-35898; DOE DE-SC0018420; DOE DE-FE0032049; SNAP 5P50AA022538 10; SNAP 5R01HL152692-04; Snp 5R01AR081448-02; and NEI 5 P30 EY001792-45 Questioned Costs: None 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method in the Research and Development Cluster. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Within the iBuy system, when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected, a radio button allows for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection is made, additional information supporting this rationale should be available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method is appropriate. We noted instances where there was not evidence that this information was available to the reviewer at the time of the approval. Out of twenty-nine small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, for five transactions (17%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Out of eleven small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Chicago, for six transactions (55%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive procurement methods selected were inappropriate. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement (Continued) Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. The electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button, but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: Accepted. While the University agrees that the supporting documentation was not captured in the electronic payment system, the rationale was available in other University records. The University will take steps to address the recommendation in this finding.
Federal Agencies: US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of Energy (DOE), US Health & Human Services (HHS) Program Names: Research & Development Cluster: Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI); Office of Science Financial Assistance Program; Fossil Energy Research and Development; Alcohol Research Programs; Cardiovascular Diseases Research; Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research; Vision Research ALN #s: 10.310; 81.049; 81.089; 93.273; 93.837; 93.846; and 93.867 Award Numbers: AG NIFA 2021-68012-35898; DOE DE-SC0018420; DOE DE-FE0032049; SNAP 5P50AA022538 10; SNAP 5R01HL152692-04; Snp 5R01AR081448-02; and NEI 5 P30 EY001792-45 Questioned Costs: None 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method in the Research and Development Cluster. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Within the iBuy system, when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected, a radio button allows for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection is made, additional information supporting this rationale should be available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method is appropriate. We noted instances where there was not evidence that this information was available to the reviewer at the time of the approval. Out of twenty-nine small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, for five transactions (17%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Out of eleven small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Chicago, for six transactions (55%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive procurement methods selected were inappropriate. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement (Continued) Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. The electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button, but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: Accepted. While the University agrees that the supporting documentation was not captured in the electronic payment system, the rationale was available in other University records. The University will take steps to address the recommendation in this finding.
Federal Agencies: US Department of Agriculture (USDA), US Department of Energy (DOE), US Health & Human Services (HHS) Program Names: Research & Development Cluster: Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI); Office of Science Financial Assistance Program; Fossil Energy Research and Development; Alcohol Research Programs; Cardiovascular Diseases Research; Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research; Vision Research ALN #s: 10.310; 81.049; 81.089; 93.273; 93.837; 93.846; and 93.867 Award Numbers: AG NIFA 2021-68012-35898; DOE DE-SC0018420; DOE DE-FE0032049; SNAP 5P50AA022538 10; SNAP 5R01HL152692-04; Snp 5R01AR081448-02; and NEI 5 P30 EY001792-45 Questioned Costs: None 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago did not have sufficient rationale documented for the noncompetitive procurement method selected within their iBuy system at the time of approval of the purchase to allow a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the procurement method in the Research and Development Cluster. Condition: The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago’s internal controls over small purchases include review and approval of a purchase requisition form that documents the procurement method selected. Within the iBuy system, when a noncompetitive procurement method is selected, a radio button allows for selection of one of several circumstances where noncompetitive procurement is permitted by 2 CFR 200.320, including that the procurement can only be fulfilled by a single source. When this selection is made, additional information supporting this rationale should be available to the reviewer to determine that this noncompetitive procurement method is appropriate. We noted instances where there was not evidence that this information was available to the reviewer at the time of the approval. Out of twenty-nine small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, for five transactions (17%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Out of eleven small purchase procurement transactions tested at the University of Illinois Chicago, for six transactions (55%), there was not sufficient evidence to support that documentation of the noncompetitive procurement method selected was provided at the time of review and approval. Based on additional information provided to us during our testing, there were no indications that the noncompetitive procurement methods selected were inappropriate. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. 2024-004. Finding: Internal Controls over Procurement (Continued) Criteria: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires nonfederal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include procedures to ensure procurement procedures are properly followed and support is properly maintained as required by 2 CFR 200.318. Cause: University officials stated a single e-procurement system is used to collect and capture procurement-related information. The electronic system required selection of the relevant procurement method in the form of a radio button, but did not require additional information in the central procurement file. Rather, this information was maintained by the requesting unit. Effect: If the procurement purchase requisition forms do not include sufficient supporting documentation of the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected, the University could approve payments of federal funds to vendors that do not meet federal regulations. (Finding Code 2024-004) Recommendation: We recommend the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the University of Illinois Chicago review current processes within the iBuy system for noncompetitive procurement transactions to ensure sufficient documentation is included to support the rationale for the noncompetitive method of procurement selected. University Response: Accepted. While the University agrees that the supporting documentation was not captured in the electronic payment system, the rationale was available in other University records. The University will take steps to address the recommendation in this finding.
.S. Department of Education passed through State of Utah Board of Education 2024-001 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program (10.553) National School Lunch Program (10.555) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The School’s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The School also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition - We selected three contracts to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for one contract lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Upon further investigation, the School determined that the vendor in question was a fraudulent vendor and transactions charged to this vendor for the program were all fraudulent charges. Of the $738,725 charged to the child nutrition program on the Annual Program Report (APR) submitted to the Utah State Board of Education for the year ended June 30, 2024, $62,246 (8%) were fraudulent charges. Cause - The School did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect - The School paid this vendor $62,246 for goods that were not provided during the year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs - $62,246 – This amount represents the costs that were charged to the federal award but did not meet program requirements and are considered fraudulent transactions. Repeat finding - No Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the School ensures it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The School will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
.S. Department of Education passed through State of Utah Board of Education 2024-001 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number) Child Nutrition Cluster: School Breakfast Program (10.553) National School Lunch Program (10.555) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The School’s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The School also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition - We selected three contracts to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for one contract lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Upon further investigation, the School determined that the vendor in question was a fraudulent vendor and transactions charged to this vendor for the program were all fraudulent charges. Of the $738,725 charged to the child nutrition program on the Annual Program Report (APR) submitted to the Utah State Board of Education for the year ended June 30, 2024, $62,246 (8%) were fraudulent charges. Cause - The School did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect - The School paid this vendor $62,246 for goods that were not provided during the year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs - $62,246 – This amount represents the costs that were charged to the federal award but did not meet program requirements and are considered fraudulent transactions. Repeat finding - No Statistically valid - Yes Recommendation - We recommend the School ensures it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The School will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed through from: NYC Housing and Preservation Department Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Continuum of Care Criteria: As required by the 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326, nonfederal entities must follow the procurement standards required by that section in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Organization did not adhere to their policy when selecting a vendor to purchase goods at their residential locations. In addition, the procurement policy of the Organization does not align with all requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not bid or procure for purchases of goods at their Euclid and Westbourne locations. Due to familiarity with the vendors, the Organization has been using them for the purchase of these goods and has not adhered to their procurement policy. Effect: The Organization is not adhering to their procurement policy and is not using a bidding process for the purchase of their goods. Context: We selected 4 vendors used that would require procurement procedures to obtain documented price or rate quotations from a number of qualified sources for testing whose purchases totaled approximately $57,000 to $165,000 for the fiscal year. The Organization could not provide us with the required documentation needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review and update its procurement policy to align with what is required by the Uniform Guidance and procure all goods, services and material purchases greater than the threshold outlined in the then revised procurement policy and in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization has engaged a professional services firm in a consulting engagement to review and assist in revising their procurement policy to align its policies and procedures for procurement with Uniform Guidance.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Passed through from: NYC Housing and Preservation Department Assistance Listing No. 14.267 Continuum of Care Criteria: As required by the 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326, nonfederal entities must follow the procurement standards required by that section in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The Organization did not adhere to their policy when selecting a vendor to purchase goods at their residential locations. In addition, the procurement policy of the Organization does not align with all requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization did not bid or procure for purchases of goods at their Euclid and Westbourne locations. Due to familiarity with the vendors, the Organization has been using them for the purchase of these goods and has not adhered to their procurement policy. Effect: The Organization is not adhering to their procurement policy and is not using a bidding process for the purchase of their goods. Context: We selected 4 vendors used that would require procurement procedures to obtain documented price or rate quotations from a number of qualified sources for testing whose purchases totaled approximately $57,000 to $165,000 for the fiscal year. The Organization could not provide us with the required documentation needed to comply with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review and update its procurement policy to align with what is required by the Uniform Guidance and procure all goods, services and material purchases greater than the threshold outlined in the then revised procurement policy and in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization has engaged a professional services firm in a consulting engagement to review and assist in revising their procurement policy to align its policies and procedures for procurement with Uniform Guidance.
FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: 84.027 – Special Education Grants to States 84.173 – Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A220073 (Year: 2022), H027A230073 (Year: 2023), H173A230081 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $44,955.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was authorized under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SEC funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local education agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $1,949,036.43 were expended and reported on the City of Valdosta Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Lastly, the School District’s applicable purchasing policy required at least two competitive prices if the price of the “…equipment, materials, or services…” exceed $1,000.00. The Valdosta City Schools Federal Programs Procedures Manual also states, “The Program Director is responsible for archiving source documentation of each purchase, such as hard copy Purchase Order Forms, printed electronic copies of Purchase Orders, quotes, sole source documentation, and Suspension and Debarment documentation.” Condition: The School District could not provide contract files or documentation for the selection or approval of one vendor that provided a software application associated with one Special Education Cluster procurement transaction. Therefore, auditors were unable to determine if the procurement transaction complied with the School District's procurement procedures, proper oversight was maintained to ensure that contractors were performing according to their contracts, and appropriate reviews were performed to verify that vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into covered transactions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $44,955.00 were identified for procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. The following Assistance Listing Number was affected by known questioned costs: 84.027. Cause: The School District’s purchasing policy that was valid when the expenditures took place was not followed due to oversight. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: 84.027 – Special Education Grants to States 84.173 – Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A220073 (Year: 2022), H027A230073 (Year: 2023), H173A230081 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $44,955.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was authorized under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SEC funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local education agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $1,949,036.43 were expended and reported on the City of Valdosta Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Lastly, the School District’s applicable purchasing policy required at least two competitive prices if the price of the “…equipment, materials, or services…” exceed $1,000.00. The Valdosta City Schools Federal Programs Procedures Manual also states, “The Program Director is responsible for archiving source documentation of each purchase, such as hard copy Purchase Order Forms, printed electronic copies of Purchase Orders, quotes, sole source documentation, and Suspension and Debarment documentation.” Condition: The School District could not provide contract files or documentation for the selection or approval of one vendor that provided a software application associated with one Special Education Cluster procurement transaction. Therefore, auditors were unable to determine if the procurement transaction complied with the School District's procurement procedures, proper oversight was maintained to ensure that contractors were performing according to their contracts, and appropriate reviews were performed to verify that vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into covered transactions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $44,955.00 were identified for procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. The following Assistance Listing Number was affected by known questioned costs: 84.027. Cause: The School District’s purchasing policy that was valid when the expenditures took place was not followed due to oversight. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education Assistance Listing Numbers and Titles: 84.027 – Special Education Grants to States 84.173 – Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A220073 (Year: 2022), H027A230073 (Year: 2023), H173A230081 (Year: 2023) Questioned Costs: $44,955.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background Information: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was authorized under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SEC funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local education agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $1,949,036.43 were expended and reported on the City of Valdosta Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Lastly, the School District’s applicable purchasing policy required at least two competitive prices if the price of the “…equipment, materials, or services…” exceed $1,000.00. The Valdosta City Schools Federal Programs Procedures Manual also states, “The Program Director is responsible for archiving source documentation of each purchase, such as hard copy Purchase Order Forms, printed electronic copies of Purchase Orders, quotes, sole source documentation, and Suspension and Debarment documentation.” Condition: The School District could not provide contract files or documentation for the selection or approval of one vendor that provided a software application associated with one Special Education Cluster procurement transaction. Therefore, auditors were unable to determine if the procurement transaction complied with the School District's procurement procedures, proper oversight was maintained to ensure that contractors were performing according to their contracts, and appropriate reviews were performed to verify that vendors were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into covered transactions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $44,955.00 were identified for procurements that were not supported by adequate documentation. These known questioned costs related to expenditures that were not tested as part of a sample, and therefore, should not be projected to a population to determine likely questioned costs. The following Assistance Listing Number was affected by known questioned costs: 84.027. Cause: The School District’s purchasing policy that was valid when the expenditures took place was not followed due to oversight. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed and required procurement and suspension and debarment documentation is properly identified, safeguarded, and retained. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP, 23611-043-PN01, 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with procurement requirements. The Cooperative did not have procedures in place to ensure compliance with procurements in excess of the SAT threshold. During 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT, and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues limited to 2023-2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds by the Cooperative are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used by the Cooperative for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP, 23611-043-PN01, 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with procurement requirements. The Cooperative did not have procedures in place to ensure compliance with procurements in excess of the SAT threshold. During 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT, and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues limited to 2023-2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds by the Cooperative are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used by the Cooperative for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP, 23611-043-PN01, 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with procurement requirements. The Cooperative did not have procedures in place to ensure compliance with procurements in excess of the SAT threshold. During 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT, and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues limited to 2023-2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds by the Cooperative are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used by the Cooperative for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States Assistance Listings Number: 84.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-043-ARP, 23611-043-PN01, 24611-043-PN01 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation is a member of the Northwest Indiana Special Education Cooperative (Cooperative). During fiscal year 2023-2024, the Cooperative operated the special education program and spent the federal money on behalf of all its members. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) When the value of the procurement for property or services exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), or a lower threshold established by a nonfederal entity, formal procurement methods are required. The SAT is typically set at $250,000; however, Indiana Code 5-22-8 has a more restrictive threshold, and, therefore, the SAT threshold is set at $150,000. Formal procurement methods require adherence to documented procedures and formal methods such as sealed bids or proposals. The School Corporation did not have internal controls in place to ensure that the Cooperative complied with procurement requirements. The Cooperative did not have procedures in place to ensure compliance with procurements in excess of the SAT threshold. During 2023-2024, the Cooperative had three vendors which exceeded the SAT, and all three vendors were tested. The Cooperative did not obtain sealed bids or competitive proposals, nor was a circumstance met that would have allowed for a noncompetitive procurement for the purchases. The total dollar amount spent with all three vendors was $1,417,349. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues limited to 2023-2024. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance awards exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 SCHOOL CITY OF HOBART SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bids method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions. . . . (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or costreimbursement type contract is awarded. Proposals are generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. . . ." Cause The Cooperative noted they were unaware of the procurement requirements of expenditures exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. They stated they have used the same vendors to provide professional services for several years but only recently started using federal grant award funds for the services. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the School Corporation cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal award funds by the Cooperative are procured using the required methods. Without following the required methods for procurement, the Cooperative could be overpaying for services. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the School Corporation should develop written policies and procedures which would require that appropriate procurement methods are used by the Cooperative for vendors that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure the procurement methods are being followed and compliance with Procurement methods are being followed. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT AND SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS, ASSISTANCE LISTING No. 21.027, Direct Allocation, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2024 Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement, debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: The city did not comply with the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR §200.318-§200.327, which require competitive procurement processes and verification that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Specifically, the city did not verify the eligibility of program recipients/participants/contractors through the System for Award Management (SAM) or equivalent documentation in order to verify that they were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Cause: The city does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allow it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Program/Cluster: Community Economic Adjustment Assistance for Responding to Threats to the Resilience of a Military Installation Federal Assistance Listing Number: 12.003 Award No.: MIR1973-22-01 Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Title 2 CFR Section 200.214 of the Uniform Guidance states that the City must comply with 2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Per 2 CFR Section 180.300, when a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. This verification may be accomplished by (1)checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the GeneralServices Administration (GSA) and available at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/, (2) collecting acertification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction withthat entity. 2 CFR 200.318(i) Procurement records. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. The City’s grant policy, chapter 100 of the City’s administrative policy, section 34 states that contracts valued between $3,500 to $150,000 allow for informal procurement methods but requires that price or rate quotes must be obtained (and kept on hand for audit purposes) from an adequate number of qualified sources. 2 CFR 200.327 requires that the recipient's or subrecipient's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II of 2 CFR 200. Condition: During our testing of the City’s provisions for procurement requirements, we noted the following: 1)For two (2) of two (2) contracts selecting for testing there was no evidence that the Cityverified the entity was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participatingin the transaction, prior to entering the contract. Upon our search, none of the vendorswere suspended or debarred. 2)For one (1) of two (2) contracts selected for testing with a contract value of $103,800, theCity did not document the history of the procurement, including the rationale for themethod of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and thebasis for the contract price. 3)For two (2) out of two (2) contracts selected for testing, the City did not include allapplicable provisions described in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. Cause: The City did not follow their policy to verify the information described in the condition prior to entering the transactions. The City did not follow their policy documenting the history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, basis for contractor selection, and the basis for the contract price. The City’s policy does not include the requirement to include all applicable provisions identified in 2 CFR 200 Appendix II in its contracts. Effect: Failure to implement and maintain a proper control process could result in payments to vendors that are suspended or debarred or improper awarding of contracts under the procurement guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified. Context/Sampling: We tested 100% of the procurement transactions. This represented a total of $1,323,800 in contracted services under the grant. $862,375 was paid for contracted services in fiscal year 2024. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No. Recommendation: We recommend the City strengthen its policies and procedures to ensure that the verification of the debarment and suspension is documented and retained, the history of procurement transactions is documented and retained in its official records, and that contracts include all applicable provisions of 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding. See separate corrective action plan.
FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 – Special Education Grants to State 84.173 – Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A220073 (Year 2023), H027A230073 (Year 2024) H173A220081 (Year 2023), H173A230081 (Year 2024) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SEC funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them, a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local education agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $404,087.80 were expended and reported on the Marion County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflects applicable State and local laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources…” Furthermore Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 state in part that the non-federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of eight procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable compliance requirements were met. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. While auditors were able to perform procedures to determine that the expenditure ultimately qualified as a sole source purchase, appropriate documentation was not maintained on file to support the rationale to limit competition. Additionally, a sample of two covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment requirements were met. While auditors were able to determine that the vendor associated with these transactions was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction as is required by the School District’s internal policies and procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that these are isolated incidents where the vendors were considered sole source because of the specialized services they provided, and as result, the procedures were not followed due to oversight. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures in the future. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement and suspension and debarment procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding
FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 – Special Education Grants to State 84.173 – Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A220073 (Year 2023), H027A230073 (Year 2024) H173A220081 (Year 2023), H173A230081 (Year 2024) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SEC funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them, a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local education agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $404,087.80 were expended and reported on the Marion County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflects applicable State and local laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources…” Furthermore Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 state in part that the non-federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of eight procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable compliance requirements were met. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. While auditors were able to perform procedures to determine that the expenditure ultimately qualified as a sole source purchase, appropriate documentation was not maintained on file to support the rationale to limit competition. Additionally, a sample of two covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment requirements were met. While auditors were able to determine that the vendor associated with these transactions was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction as is required by the School District’s internal policies and procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that these are isolated incidents where the vendors were considered sole source because of the specialized services they provided, and as result, the procedures were not followed due to oversight. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures in the future. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement and suspension and debarment procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding
FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 – Special Education Grants to State 84.173 – Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A220073 (Year 2023), H027A230073 (Year 2024) H173A220081 (Year 2023), H173A230081 (Year 2024) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SEC funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them, a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local education agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $404,087.80 were expended and reported on the Marion County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflects applicable State and local laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources…” Furthermore Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 state in part that the non-federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of eight procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable compliance requirements were met. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. While auditors were able to perform procedures to determine that the expenditure ultimately qualified as a sole source purchase, appropriate documentation was not maintained on file to support the rationale to limit competition. Additionally, a sample of two covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment requirements were met. While auditors were able to determine that the vendor associated with these transactions was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction as is required by the School District’s internal policies and procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that these are isolated incidents where the vendors were considered sole source because of the specialized services they provided, and as result, the procedures were not followed due to oversight. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures in the future. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement and suspension and debarment procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding
FA 2024-001 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 84.027 – Special Education Grants to State 84.173 – Special Education Preschool Grants Federal Award Numbers: H027A220073 (Year 2023), H027A230073 (Year 2024) H173A220081 (Year 2023), H173A230081 (Year 2024) Questioned Costs: None Identified Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement and suspension and debarment procedures were followed. Background: The Special Education Cluster (SEC), which is comprised of the Special Education Grants to States (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) programs, was created by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). SEC funding is available to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them, a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepares them for further education, employment, and independent living; ensure that the rights of children with disabilities and their parents are protected; assist states, localities, educational service agencies, and federal agencies to provide for the education of all children with disabilities; and assess and ensure the effectiveness of efforts to educate children with disabilities. SEC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Education (ED). GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local education agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the expenditure of funds by LEAs. SEC funds totaling $404,087.80 were expended and reported on the Marion County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2024. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, which reflects applicable State and local laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources…” Furthermore Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 state in part that the non-federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of eight procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable compliance requirements were met. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations were obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. While auditors were able to perform procedures to determine that the expenditure ultimately qualified as a sole source purchase, appropriate documentation was not maintained on file to support the rationale to limit competition. Additionally, a sample of two covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment requirements were met. While auditors were able to determine that the vendor associated with these transactions was not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction as is required by the School District’s internal policies and procedures. Cause: In discussing the deficiencies with management, they stated that these are isolated incidents where the vendors were considered sole source because of the specialized services they provided, and as result, the procedures were not followed due to oversight. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and GaDOE guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirements exposes the School District to unnecessary risk of error and misuse of federal funds and could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors. In addition, this deficiency could lead to the return of grant funds associated with unallowable expenditures in the future. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement and suspension and debarment procedures are followed, and appropriate documentation is obtained and retained on-file. In addition, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-087-ARP, 22619-087-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Small purchase procedures require that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources or documented reasoning to support a single source provider. During the audit period, the School Corporation had six vendors, totaling $165,726, that were determined to require small purchase procedures. Two vendors were selected for testing. For the two vendors tested, the School Corporation procured $82,669 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchases. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Additionally, the School Corporation had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; procedures ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Three covered transactions for goods or services that exceeded $25,000 paid from the Special Education funds during the audit period were identified. The School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment for any of the three vendors. Amounts paid to the vendors totaled $131,637. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. In addition, the Treasurer and Assistant Superintendent of Schools assumed the vendor's suspension and debarment status was verified and quotes were being obtained or reasoning for a single source provider was being documented. There was not adequate oversight to ensure proper procurement procedures were being followed. Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-087-ARP, 22619-087-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Small purchase procedures require that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources or documented reasoning to support a single source provider. During the audit period, the School Corporation had six vendors, totaling $165,726, that were determined to require small purchase procedures. Two vendors were selected for testing. For the two vendors tested, the School Corporation procured $82,669 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchases. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Additionally, the School Corporation had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; procedures ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Three covered transactions for goods or services that exceeded $25,000 paid from the Special Education funds during the audit period were identified. The School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment for any of the three vendors. Amounts paid to the vendors totaled $131,637. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. In addition, the Treasurer and Assistant Superintendent of Schools assumed the vendor's suspension and debarment status was verified and quotes were being obtained or reasoning for a single source provider was being documented. There was not adequate oversight to ensure proper procurement procedures were being followed. Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-087-ARP, 22619-087-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system, which would include segregation of duties, was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a nonfederal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds: micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Small purchase procedures require that price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources or documented reasoning to support a single source provider. During the audit period, the School Corporation had six vendors, totaling $165,726, that were determined to require small purchase procedures. Two vendors were selected for testing. For the two vendors tested, the School Corporation procured $82,669 in services and could not provide evidence of open competition or quotes for the purchases. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 15 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Additionally, the School Corporation had not established a purchasing policy that would reflect applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items; procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured; procedures ensure that all solicitations identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals; and did not maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with federal award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that vendor. Three covered transactions for goods or services that exceeded $25,000 paid from the Special Education funds during the audit period were identified. The School Corporation did not verify the vendor's suspension and debarment status prior to payment for any of the three vendors. Amounts paid to the vendors totaled $131,637. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The School Corporation did not have the proper safeguards in place to ensure that the documentation was properly maintained. As a result, the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. In addition, the Treasurer and Assistant Superintendent of Schools assumed the vendor's suspension and debarment status was verified and quotes were being obtained or reasoning for a single source provider was being documented. There was not adequate oversight to ensure proper procurement procedures were being followed. Effect The School Corporation was not able to provide the documentation that they followed the proper procurement procedures or that they verified vendors were not suspended or debarred. By not following proper procurement procedures, the School Corporation may not be receiving the most competitive pricing. If the School Corporation does not verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred, the School Corporation may be purchasing from vendors that are not eligible to receive federal funds. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, material noncompliance remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure there are appropriate procurement procedures for goods and services and that contractors and subrecipients, as appropriate, are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded prior to entering into any contracts or subawards. Documentation of all procurement and suspension and debarment activities should be maintained. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.