Findings Citing § 200.318

Criteria or Specific Requirement – 2CFR Section 200.318(i) requires an Organization to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include the rationale for the procurement method, contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Conditions – During 2024, the Organization did not maintain documentation related to how they chose a contractor for construction projects such as how they chose contractors to get bids from, how many bids were obtained, detailed bid information, and what factors they considered in choosing a contractor. No documentation exists showing considerations of price, contingencies, length of contract, and perceived risks. Context – The Organization exceeded the single audit threshold for the first time in 2024, primarily due to a one-time coronavirus grant. Cause – Management was not aware of the requirement to maintain procurement documentation. Effect or Potential Effect – The absence of procurement documentation increases the risk of non-compliance with federal regulations and limits the ability to demonstrate that federal regulations were followed. Recommendation – We recommend maintaining documentation supporting the compliance with federal regulations for all expenditures of federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Management acknowledges the finding and appreciates the auditor’s recommendation. The Organization exceeded the Single Audit threshold for the first time in 2024 due to a one-time coronavirus-related grant. As a result, management was not fully aware of the federal procurement documentation requirements applicable to these funds. To address this matter, management has implemented procedures to ensure that procurement documentation supporting compliance with federal regulations is maintained for all federal expenditures. These procedures include staff training on federal grant compliance requirements, enhanced oversight of procurement activities, and the use of standardized documentation and retention practices. Management believes these corrective actions will mitigate the risk of future noncompliance and strengthen overall federal grant administration.

Finding 2024-001 – Noncompliance with Procurement Standards – Professional Services Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Covid-19), ALN #21.027 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to maintain documented procurement procedures that ensure full and open competition (2 CFR §200.318). For procurements within the small purchase threshold, nonfederal entities are required to obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR §200.320). Professional service contracts are subject to these requirements. Condition: The auditee did not follow established procurement policies and the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR §200.317–§200.327 when engaging legal counsel. Specifically, the auditee procured legal services with total costs between $10,000 and $250,000 without obtaining and documenting required price or rate quotations or performing a documented evaluation of qualified firms. Cause: The auditee did not document a noncompetitive procurement justification or otherwise comply with the small purchase procurement requirements because it was not aware that professional legal services were subject to standards under Uniform Guidance. Additionally, at the time the legal services were engaged, management did not anticipate that the related expenditures would be subject to a Single Audit. Effect: Failure to follow required procurement procedures increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations and may result in questioned costs if the expenditures are determined to be unallowable. Context: The audit finding represents an isolated instance. The amount of the audit finding was $22,672 out of the total of $4,605,256 for the program and was discovered using a valid judgmentally selected sample size. Recommendation: We recommend the auditee strengthen internal controls over procurement by ensuring all professional service contracts within the $10,000 to $250,000 threshold comply with federal procurement standards, including obtaining and documenting price or rate quotations from qualified sources and documenting justification for any noncompetitive procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and plans to reinforce procurement requirements, and implement review procedures to ensure compliance with procurement thresholds and documentation requirements prior to contract execution.

Finding 2024-002: 93.591 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalitions Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Non-Compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.318(a), non-Federal entities must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part. Additionally, policies must address standards of conduct, competition, cost analysis, and methods of procurement. Condition: During the review of the Organization’s procurement procedures, it was noted that the Organization does not have an updated, written procurement policy that reflects the requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318 – 200.327. The current policy on file predates the implementation of the Uniform Guidance and does not incorporate key standards such as micro-purchase thresholds, competitive bidding requirements, or conflict of interest provisions. Effect: Without an updated procurement policy that aligns with federal requirements, the Organization is at risk of noncompliant procurement practices. This could lead to unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, and potentially jeopardize future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The Organization has not reviewed or revised its procurement policy since the adoption of the Uniform Guidance, resulting in outdated internal procedures. _x000C_Recommendation: The Organization should update its procurement policy to fully align with the procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318 through § 200.327. Staff responsible for procurement should also be trained on the updated procedures to ensure consistent and compliant practices.

Program: ALL No. 10.523 Centers of Excellence at 1890 Institutions Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: Yes Condition: During our audit we noted that procurement documentation was not available to support the selection of a sole source vendor nor able to obtain documentation to support the Foundation entering into contractual agreements with vendors who were not debarred or suspended from doing business with the federal government. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.514: (c) Internal control. (1) The compliance supplement provides guidance on internal controls over Federal programs based upon the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the Internal Control - Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). COSO requires entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls to achieve operational, reporting and compliance objectives. Per 2 CFR 200.320 General procurement: (a) Noncompetitive procurement. There are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold; (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. Per 2 CFR 200.318 General procurement: (b) The non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified in this part. Per Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Cause: Program personnel were unaware of the requirement included in Uniform Guidance related to procedures required for procurement. Effect: If procurement were not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, the Foundation would not identify the noncompliance timely. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop and implement written procurement policies and procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance, provide periodic training to program personnel, and establish a review process to ensure procurement activities comply with applicable federal requirements. We also recommend the Foundation follow their process to verify that entities are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded annually at time of award and to document these procedures. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Refer to management’s corrective action plans. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.

Finding 2024-001: Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN 21.027) Condition: During our testing of procurement for ALN 21.027, we noted that the City procured certain goods/services through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s COSTARS cooperative purchasing program. For items selected for testing, totaling $184,512, the City did not conduct its own competitive procurement process. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. The City does not have implemented monitoring procedures over its use of COSTARS, including [e.g., periodic review of COSTARS procurement documentation, confirmation that COSTARS contracts were competitively awarded, and verification that applicable federal clauses are incorporated]. Documentation in the procurement files was not sufficient to clearly demonstrate how the underlying COSTARS procurement complied with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards for the specific federal award (e.g., basis for contractor selection, method of procurement relative to 2 CFR 200.320 thresholds, and required federal contract provisions). Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the value of the procurement transaction. Cooperative purchasing arrangements (such as state contracts or COSTARS) are not prohibited by the Uniform Guidance; however, the municipality must assume responsibility for the procurement and document how the cooperative contract satisfies the federal procurement requirements applicable to the award. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. The City has chosen to leverage the COSTARS cooperative purchasing program to improve efficiency and obtain favorable pricing. While the City has implemented monitoring over COSTARS (for example, reviewing selected COSTARS contract information and maintaining communication with the state regarding procurement practices), those procedures have not been formalized in the written procurement policy, and the related documentation is not consistently retained in the individual grant procurement files. As a result, the audit file did not contain clear, consistent evidence that the COSTARS contracts used for the tested transactions met all applicable Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, without documentation demonstrating clear, consistent evidence that COSTARS contracts used for purchases met all applicable Uniform Guidance procurement requirements, there is an increased risk of noncompliance which could result in unallowable costs being charged to the Federal awards. Repeat finding: Yes, finding 2023-002 Questioned costs known and likely: $184,512 known and $124,662 likely. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows all Uniform Guidance procurement standards, especially regarding cooperating purchasing programs. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See Corrective Action Plan.

2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 Payment. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B) 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. The General Health District did not have written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. The failure to implement written policies as required by Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The General Health District should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

2024-004 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Year of Finding Origination: 2024 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Program: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Award Number and Year: 1057187; 2024 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Transportation Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Manual provides guidance and responsibilities for project sponsors. In addition to acting as the fiscal agent, the sponsor is taking on responsibility that the project will be completed in accordance with all of the federal and state rules and regulations that apply. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318(i) states that the County must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Federal requirements prohibit non-federal entities from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.300 describes a required verification process. Prior to entering into the transaction, one of the following must be performed: (1) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (2) collecting a certification, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the contracting party. Condition: Faribault County acted as the sponsor for a project for a local city and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The County did not develop controls over the sponsored project to ensure compliance for procurement. This included: • The County did not maintain records to support the history of procurement. • The County did not maintain documentation that the requirements for suspension or debarment were met by (a) checking SAM.gov exclusions, (b) collecting a certification from the vendor, or (c) verifying a clause or condition was included in the contract. Questioned Costs: None. Context: In June 2024, the County approved a resolution to act as a sponsoring agent for a city project. The project expenditures were $61,458 with payments made to the city for reimbursement. Effect: Without controls in place over the sponsored project, there is an increased risk of noncompliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Cause: The County was unaware of the responsibilities of a project sponsor. Recommendation: We recommend the County implement controls to ensure projects the County sponsors are completed in accordance with all the federal and state rules and regulations that apply. View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge

Department of the Treasury Federal Financial Assistance Listing/ALN 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement policies required. Condition – The Organization does not have a procurement policy that conforms to applicable standards under Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. In addition, it was noted that there was no documentation to support suspension and debarment verification. Additionally, the Organization did not have proper procedures to ensure contracts include all required provisions. Cause – The Organization did not have proper procedures to ensure a procurement policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance was followed and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all the requirements for procurement, suspension, and debarment. Effect – The Organization did not comply with Uniform Guidance relating to Procurement. Questioned Costs – None reported. Context/Sampling – Overall procurement policy and two contracts out of a population of six total contracts. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s) – No Recommendation – We recommend the Organization revise their procurement policy to follow Uniform Guidance and to follow those applicable procurement policies for applicable contracts. We also recommend the Organization review all contracts to ensure they include all required provisions as outlined by Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the finding.

Finding 2024-003: Procurement (Significant Deficiency) Federal Programs ALN 19.019 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318, the Uniform Guidance requires that a recipient of U.S Government funds must use their own documented procurement procedures which reflect the applicable Uniform Guidance requirements to procure goods and services in order to ensure that all purchases are conducted in a manner that provides full and open competition. Condition: During our testing over procurement, we determined that ICMEC did not consistently document the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Cause: ICMEC did not follow their established internal procurement policy and that policy did not follow the requirements of the Uniform Guidance for procurement. Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to, and thus, there lies the potential that ICMEC will not receive the best value for its purchases. The procurement process also allows for the evaluation of potential conflicts of interest with prospective vendors and contractors. Failure to perform the proper procurement procedures could result in disallowance of Federal expenditures based on lack of fair competition. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Our audit procedures consisted of testwork completed on individual expenditures charged to the Federal awards. The report in which samples were selected was generated directly from ICMEC's general ledger (accounting system). We consider our sample to be representative of the population. The condition appeared to be systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Refer to Finding 2023-003. Recommendation: We recommend that ICMEC revise their procurement policy to be align with required Uniform Guidance standards. This policy should be communicated to all employees and enforced during the upcoming year. All procurement records for purchases in excess of the threshold should include the following at a minimum: (a) basis for the contractor/goods selected or (b) justification for lack of competition when quotes or competitive bids are not obtained. Additionally, the conclusion should be clearly documented and accompany the procurement documentation. We also believe that all long-standing contractual engagements should evidence occasional re-evaluation to ensure such relationships are free of conflicts.

Finding 2024-002 Procurement - Significant Deficiency Program name: Office for Coastal Management Assistance Listing: 11.473 Federal award Identification number: 20 NFWF 339630 Federal award year: 9/1/2020 - 9/30/2024 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Commerce Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.318 (i), recipients and subrecipients must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement. These records must include: rationale for the method of procurement; selection of contract type; contractor selection or rejection, and; basis for the contract price. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.318(a) requires entities to maintain and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with applicable laws and regulations. Condition - The Organization has a written procurement policy in place; however, it was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that procurement transactions during the audit period were conducted in accordance with that policy. Specifically, the auditee did not retain records detailing the procurement method used, contractor selection rationale, or price justification for sampled transactions. Cause - The Organization did not maintain or consistently apply documentation protocols for internal control reviews. Formal documentation practices were not in place during the audit period. Effect - Without sufficient documentation, the auditee cannot demonstrate compliance with Federal procurement standards. This increases the risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements and may result in unallowable costs or questioned costs. Questioned costs - None identified. Perspective - The deficiency was pervasive across multiple procurement transactions. Identification of Repeat Findings - This is a repeat finding from the prior year (Finding 2023-003). As a result of the 2023 audit report, issued in February 2026, the Organization began the process of developing updated policies for compliance. In 2025, the Organization formally adopted a new procurement policy as well as procedures to ensure proper documentation will be maintained. Recommendation - We recommend that the Organization strengthen its internal controls over procurement by: Ensuring all procurement transactions are documented in accordance with 2 CFR 200.319(i). Training staff on documentation requirements. Periodically reviewing procurement files for completeness and compliance. Management response - Management agrees with this assessment and has committed to a corrective action plan. Management has also engaged with a new accounting firm to oversee the financial reporting functions at the Organization.

U.S. Department of Treasury passed through State of Utah Department of Workforce Services and through Colorado Department of Human Services 2024-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). Context and condition: We selected five contracts to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for three contracts lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause: The Academy did not follow its procurement policy for publicly soliciting bids. Effect: A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned costs: No costs were questioned. Recommednation: We recommend the Academy ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: The Academy will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.

Criteria: Per Federal regulations for general procurement standards (2 CFR § 200.318 (i)), non‑Federal entities must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement process. These records will include but are not limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: In our procurement testing for CSLFRF funding, the City was unable to provide evidence that demonstrates public notice was published according to (2 CFR § 200.320(b)) for the projects selected. Cause and Effect: Due to the City not conducting procurement for all CSLFRF expenditures through its projects, sufficient evidence was not available to demonstrate that full and open competition was provided to potential bidders, as required. Documentation supporting compliance with procurement requirements, including public notice and solicitation efforts, was not available. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement and enforce procurement policies that require formal solicitation of bids for applicable projects. Initiating a competitive bidding process helps ensure compliance with federal and state procurement standards, promotes transparency, and supports the selection of the most qualified and cost‑effective vendors. Management Response: Management concurs with the finding that procurement documentation for CSLFRF‑funded projects was insufficient to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement standards, including the requirement for public notice under 2 CFR § 200.320(b). The absence of complete records limited the City’s ability to show that full and open competition was provided. To address this issue, the City will revise and strengthen its procurement policies to require formal solicitation and complete documentation for all applicable projects. A centralized system for retaining procurement records will be implemented to ensure that evidence of public notice, solicitation efforts, bid evaluations, and contract award decisions is consistently maintained. Staff involved in procurement will receive training on federal requirements, and a pre‑award compliance checklist will be introduced to verify that all required documentation is in place before contracts are executed. Management will work with all departments involved in procurement to reinforce expectations, implement improved procedures, and ensure that required documentation is consistently retained.

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires written policies and procedures documenting how the organization determines and complies with the applicable compliance requirements. Condition: BREC does not currently maintain written policies and procedures for determining and documenting the applicable compliance requirements in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318-326. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: Written policies and procedures for the applicable compliance requirements have not been developed. Effect: Written policies and procedures over the applicable compliance requirements are not available to guide staff responsible for federal expenditures. Recommendation: We recommend that BREC develop written policies and procedures for determining and documenting the applicable compliance requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes. View of Responsible Official: A written SOP was developed for determining allowable costs and procurement requirements in accordance with the applicable CFR to guide key finance staff with responsibility for federally eligible expenditures.

ALN 14.251 and ALN 21.027 Finding #2024‐006 Financial Policies and Procedures Repeat Finding: No Condition: The Organization did not have formalized, written financial policies and procedures that address key Uniform Guidance requirements. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.302(b), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award. Uniform Guidance further requires that entities implement written policies and procedures governing: · Allowable costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) and 200.403–200.405), · Procurement (2 CFR 200.317–200.327), · Cash management (2 CFR 200.305), · Travel costs (2 CFR 200.475), and · Conflict of interest (2 CFR 200.318(c)(1)). Written policies serve as the framework for consistent compliance with federal requirements. Cause: The Organization had not developed or adopted written financial policies, relying instead on informal practices and staff knowledge to manage federal awards. Effect: The absence of formalized financial policies increases the risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance, inconsistent application of requirements, and potential misuse of federal funds. The lack of a documented framework also limits accountability and makes it difficult to train new staff or demonstrate compliance to oversight agencies. Questioned Costs: None noted. Perspective Information: This condition applied to the Organization’s overall financial management system and impacted all federal programs administered during the year ended December 31, 2024. As such, the lack of formalized financial policies represents a systemic issue and a material weakness in internal control over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt formal, written financial policies and procedures that address all Uniform Guidance requirements applicable to federal awards. These policies should be approved by management and the governing body, disseminated to staff, and reviewed periodically to ensure continued compliance. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. The Organization will establish formalized accounting policies and procedures that adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.

Condition – The Organization did not have written policies and procedures in place that define its procurement requirements. Procurement practices were not formally documented, resulting in inconsistent application of procurement standards. Criteria – Under the Uniform Administrative Requirements (2 CFR 200.318–200.326), non-federal entities must establish and maintain written procurement policies and procedures that reflect applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. These policies must address competition, methods of procurement, contract oversight, and other required elements. Effect – Without documented procurement policies and procedures, the Organization is at increased risk of noncompliance with federal procurement standards, inconsistent procurement practices, inadequate competition, and potential misuse of federal funds. Recommendation – The Organization should develop and implement written procurement policies and procedures that comply with the Uniform Guidance. Policies should clearly define procurement thresholds, required documentation, competitive bidding requirements, and approval responsibilities. Staff should be trained on the finalized procedures to ensure consistent and compliant application. Management's Response – See management's corrective action plan on pages 32-33.

Finding Number: 2024-003 AL Number and Title: Federal Transit Cluster Federal Award Identification Number / Year: OH-2020-048-00, OH-2021-014-00, OH-2021-033-00, OH-2022-021-00, OH-2023-034-00, OH-2022-003-00, OH-2022-021-00 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Pass-Through Entity: N/A Repeat Finding from Prior Audit? No Material Weakness and Noncompliance 2 CFR § 1200.10 states, in part, this part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the Department of Transportation policies and procedures for nonprocurement suspension and debarment. It thereby gives regulatory effect for the Department of Transportation to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. In addition, 2 CFR § 1201.1 indicates except as otherwise provided in this part, the Department of Transportation adopts the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200). This part supersedes and repeals the requirements of the Department of Transportation Common Rules (49 CFR part 18 and part 19). 2 CFR § 180.305 states that Non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred or whose principals are suspended or debarred, unless the Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under 2 CFR § 180.135. 2 CFR § 180.200 identifies “covered transactions” as nonprocurement or procurement transactions at the primary tier, between a Federal agency and a person; or at the lower tier, between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Procurement contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) are covered transactions if the contracts are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other specified criteria outlined in 2 CFR § 180.220 and 2 CFR § 1200.220. All nonprocurement transactions as defined in 2 CFR § 180.970 (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless exempt by 2 CFR § 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking SAM exclusions (https://sam.gov/content/home); collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transactions with that entity. In addition, the Medina County Transit Purchasing Policies and Procedures Manual III-5 Responsible Bidder section requires documentation of an excluded parties list search for contractors and subcontractors whose contract exceeds $25,000. 2 CFR § 200.318 requires the non-Federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, the Medina County Transit Purchasing Policies and Procedures Manual I-14 Source Selection requires the Transit Director to maintain records detailing the listing of procurement, including the selection of type of contract type, reasons for selection, basis for contract price, and rationale for method of procurement. The County did not have proper internal controls in place to verify that all entities, with whom the County had entered covered transactions, had not been suspended or debarred. There were three instances in which the Federal Transit Cluster grant made total payments to vendors of more than $25,000 and there was no evidence the County checked the SAM exclusions, collected a certification from the entity, or added a clause or condition to the covered transactions with the vendors. In addition, for 24 of 27 procurement transactions, the County did not maintain adequate documentation to detail the full history of procurement. Failure to have appropriate controls in place may result in vendors receiving federal funds that are suspended or debarred, and noncompliance with federal procurement requirements. The County should verify vendors are not suspended or debarred by checking the SAM exclusions, collecting a certification from the vendor, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the vendor prior to contracting with vendors that will be paid with federal funds. In addition, the County should maintain documentation of the history of procurements.

Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.318 require that AEA have documented procurement procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward. Condition: AEA follows the Weather Assistance Program Policies and Procedures Manual which has a procurement and suspension and debarment policy; however, AEA did not formally adopt a written policy that complies with the Office of Management and Budget’s (the “OMB”) requirements for procurement suspension and debarment. Cause: AEA did not formally adopt a written policy that complies with OMB requirements for procurement suspension and debarment. Effect: AEA is not in compliance with 2 CFR Part 200.317–200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: Not applicable. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: Although there were no purchases in the audit period meeting the threshold for competitive bidding, we recommend that the AEA formally adopt a written procurement and suspension and debarment policy in accordance with the requirements. View of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-001 Information on the federal program: Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity: N/A – Direct Grant Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)...." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . .” 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . “ 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Condition: The City did not have internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. The City had not designed or implemented adequate policies or procedures to ensure that proper procurement procedures for small purchase and simplified acquisition procurement thresholds were followed. Cause: The City had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirements for covered transactions. Effect: Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, procurement procedures for goods and services were not adhered to and vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 were not verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. The failure to comply with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could have resulted in the loss of federal funds to the City. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs. Context: For one out of three samples selected for the small purchase procurement threshold, three quotes and rationale for selecting the vendor were not documented. Small purchase procurements require three competing quotes and rationale for selection of the vendor. The procurement was for park improvement design services. The City was unaware that professional services are required to follow the federal procurement process. Per grant requirements, all grant funded expenditures require appropriate procurement, regardless of whether it is a good or service. For two out of three samples selected for suspension and debarment testing, the City did not have support that vendors procured under CSLFRF funding were not suspended or debarred. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, finding 2023-003 in the prior year report. Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish and implement control procedures to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. This should include ensuring proper procurement methods are followed, suspension and debarment checks are performed and documented prior to entering into the transaction. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management acknowledges the finding. See management’s corrective action plan attached to this audit report.

FINDING 2024‐002 – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Instance of Material Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number: 21.029 Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Award Year: 2024 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to establish and follow documented procurement procedures and ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. 2 CFR §200.318(a): Requires entities to have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with federal standards. 2 CFR §200.318(i): Requires maintenance of records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. 2 CFR §200.214: Prohibits contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred, requiring verification. Condition and context: The Cooperative has not developed or implemented formal written procurement policies and procedures that comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Additionally, the Cooperative has not established procedures to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. As a result, for a sample of three vendors and six procurement transactions tested, the Cooperative did not document suspension and debarment verification (e.g., SAM.gov) for vendors and contractors procured under the federal award. The absence of documented procedures also indicates that procurement activities are not being performed under a standardized framework aligned with federal requirements. Questioned costs: None. Effect: Due to the lack of formalized procurement processes and controls there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Expenditures could be paid to suspended or debarred vendors resulting in disallowed expenditures, and noncompliance with the grant agreement. Cause: This was a new grant for the Cooperative, management did not have a sufficient understanding of the procurement-related control requirements necessary to comply with the grant agreement and Uniform Guidance. As a result, procurement processes were not formally established or aligned with federal requirements. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Cooperative develops and implements written procurement policies and procedures in compliance with 2 CFR §200.318–§200.327, including competitive procurement requirements, cost/price analysis, documentation, and record retention. Establish procedures to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements, including performing SAM.gov verification prior to contract award and retaining documentation of verification in procurement files. Lastly, we recommend implementing monitoring controls to ensure procurement documentation and compliance requirements are consistently met. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Wabash is currently in the process of formalizing its procurement standards and internal controls. While management previously managed contractor selections through established internal practices, management recognizes the requirement for a comprehensive written procurement policy that explicitly outlines selection criteria and mandatory debarment verification procedures. To remediate the identified material weakness, Wabash will implement a formal Procurement Policy and Procedure by June 30, 2026. Contact Person(s): Jason Griffy, Network Operations Manager Justin Gephart, Chief Operating Officer

Finding #2024-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Department of the Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN 21.027) Passed Through Payments from the State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.318, non-federal entities must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in 2 CFR § 200.318 through 200.327. Condition: During our testing of procurement transactions, we noted that the District does not have a formal, written procurement policy that incorporates the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result of the District not having a formally documented procurement policy meeting the requirements of the Uniform Guidance, the District failed to verify whether parties it was entering into covered transactions with were suspended or debarred. Cause: The District’s management failed to develop and adopt a formal written procurement policy that aligns with federal regulations. There was a lack of oversight and necessary training regarding the specific administrative requirements of the Uniform Guidance for federally funded programs. Effect: The absence of a compliant procurement policy and related internal control increases the risk that federal funds could be misappropriated or paid to excluded parties. The deficiency results in non-compliance with federal statutes and may lead to questioned costs by the awarding agency. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $962,807 based on all transactions tested and likely questioned costs of $135,384. Context: Of the District’s charges to the major program during the fiscal year, a sample of 6 transactions totaling $962,807 were tested out of a total population of 22 and total expenditures of $1,098,191. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that District management immediately draft and adopt a comprehensive written procurement policy that adheres to 2 CFR §§ 200.318 through 200.327. This policy should specifically include: • Procedures for verifying and documenting the suspension and debarment status of vendors. • Defined thresholds for micro-purchases, small purchases, and sealed bids • Requirements for conducting and documenting cost or price analyses for all procurements exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Views of Responsible Officials: District agrees with the finding and will take the necessary steps to draft and adopt a comprehensive procurement policy which meets the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.

Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.902 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Soil and Water Conservation Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Periods: Grant # NR205F48XXXXC006 and period September 30, 2020 through September 30, 2025 and Grant # FAN NR223A750022C002 and period December 21, 2023 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Environmental Quality Incentives Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Periods: Grant # NR205F48XXXXC006 and period September 30, 2020 through September 30, 2025 and Grant # FAN NR223A750022C002 and period December 21, 2023 through September 30, 2025 Assistance Listing Number(s): 10.924 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Conservation Stewardship Program Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Periods: Grant # NR205F48XXXXC006 and period September 30, 2020 through September 30, 2025 and Grant # FAN NR223A750022C002 and period December 21, 2023 through September 30, 2025 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 require a nonfederal entity to establish written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct, including procedures to implement the cash management requirements of 2 CFR section 200.305, procedures that comply with the procurement standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326, and procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E of 2 CFR Part 200. Specifically, 2 CFR sections 200.430, 200.431, and 200.475 require written policies. Condition: There are no written policies and procedures for allowable costs/cost principles, cash management, procurement and suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not have a process for reviewing their accounting policies and procedures manual on a regular basis to ensure written procedures conform to Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A lack of written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct may result in noncompliance with the requirements of federal programs and/or disallowed costs. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the Organization’s written policies and procedures be reviewed and updated for compliance with Uniform Guidance. he organization should become familiar with the requirements of Subparts D and E of 2 CFR Part 200 and establish appropriate written policies, procedures, and standards of conduct. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and they will evaluate our findings to determine an appropriate corrective action. Financial policies and procedures will be created and implemented. Annual schedule of expenditures will be created by Executive Director or Bookkeeper and reviewed by Board of Directors.

Information on Federal Programs: 93.083 – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevention of Disease, Disability, and Death through Immunization & Control of Respiratory & Related Diseases. Criteria or Specific Requirements: 2 CFR §200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the award is managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the COSO Internal Control Integrated Framework. 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures for the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award that are consistent with the standards for general procurement, competition, and methods of procurement. Condition: ATS’s organization-wide procurement policy does not include documented procurement procedures that address the Uniform Guidance requirements for procurement under Federal awards (for example, methods of procurement, competition requirements, and applicable thresholds) as required by 2 CFR §200.318-200.320. For the federally funded program, ATS implemented a separate written selection policy for contractors/health systems; however, this policy does not fully address all Uniform Guidance procurement elements. Cause: Management had not fully updated its written procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the specific requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for procurements under Federal awards. As a result, internal control procedures over procurement under the Federal program were not fully documented in a manner consistent with the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Failure to have and use fully documented procurement policies and procedures compliant with the Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with Federal procurement requirements and increase the risk of unallowable or improperly procured costs under Federal awards. In the current year, our testing did not identify specific instances in which procurement transactions under the Federal program were noncompliant; however, the lack of fully compliant written procedures represents a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Perspective: ATS did not have documented procurement policies and procedures that were fully compliant with 2 CFR §200.320 for procurement under Federal awards. However, for the Federal program, ATS established a documented selection criteria policy for contractors/health systems. Under this policy, a selection subcommittee reviews, evaluates, and selects health systems based on defined criteria, and each selected application is submitted to the prime awardee for review and approval before ATS issues contracts. In a random sample of 8 procurement contracts tested, all 8 followed the documented selection process and were supported by appropriate documentation. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Continued Finding 2023-005. Recommendation: ATS should update and formalize its procurement policies and procedures to incorporate the requirements of 2 CFR §200.318-200.320 for all procurements under Federal awards, including: methods of procurement and thresholds, competition requirements, documentation of procurement history, and oversight responsibilities. Once updated, ATS should ensure the procurement under the Federal program is carried out in accordance with these policies and that staff are trained on the revised requirements.

2024-003 - Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment - Material weakness Federal program information: Funding Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program Title Indian Housing Block Grant Federal Assistance Listing Number 14.867 Condition: During testing of five procurement transactions, exceptions were identified in two instances. In one sample, verification of the vendor’s status in SAM.gov was performed after the contract award date, indicating noncompliance with pre-award suspension and debarment requirements. In another sample related to the purchase of a vehicle, the procurement file was missing evidence of comparative bidding. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327, non-federal entities must follow documented procurement procedures for federally funded purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. These procedures require full and open competition, appropriate procurement methods based on dollar thresholds, and maintenance of records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including the method used, selection of contractor, and basis for price. Cause: The Housing Entity did not consistently follow established procurement procedures to ensure adequate competition, proper documentation of the procurement process, and timely verification of vendor eligibility. Effect: The Housing Entity was unable to demonstrate compliance with federal procurement and suspension and debarment requirements due to noncompliance with procurement procedures and untimely vendor verification, constituting a material weakness. Auditor's Recommendation: The Housing Entity should ensure SAM.gov verification is completed before awards, maintain complete procurement documentation, and provide staff training to comply with federal procurement requirements.

United States Department of the Treasury Reference Number: 2024-011 Program: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Federal Award Number: 51-6000255 Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Procurement Condition: During our audit of procurement transactions related to the SLFRF, we noted one instance where the Town acquired underground primary wire at a cost of $213,900 without documenting the quotes received or the procurement procedures, as required by federal regulations. A similar finding was reported in prior years’ audits. Criteria: Under 2 CFR §200.318-§200.326, non-federal entities must follow documented procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided those procedures conform to federal standards. This purchase exceeded the $50,000 micro-purchase threshold, so it required the Simplified Acquisitions Procedures. Those procedures require obtaining quotes and documenting the procurement procedures. Cause: The Town did not document its procurement policies due to turnover in key positions during the year. Effect: The Town was not in compliance with the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) at 2 CFR §200.318-§200.326. The lack of documenting the quotes received and procurement procedures followed increases the risk that the Town may not receive the best prices or terms for the goods and services it purchases. Recommendation: We recommend that the Finance Department enhance its processes and oversight surrounding federal procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Town Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See corrective action plan. Responsible Positions: Town Manager and Director of Finance

FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Contract #65873, SLT-3157 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Natural Resources Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-004. Condition and Context Procurement The County did adopt an applicable federal purchasing policy. The Lake County Indiana Purchasing Manual for Supplies, Services, and Public Works states on page 19 that "Federal funds less than $25,000 will obtain 3 quotes by telephone or fax and obtain board approval. . . ." The Lake County Indiana Purchasing Manual for Supplies, Services, and Public Works also states on page 19 that "Federal funds more than $25,000 but less than $50,000 will invite 3 quotes at an open public meeting." The federal procurement requirement, per the Code of Federal Regulations section 200.320, states that for small purchases, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. In 2024, the County had two vendors. One was paid $27,963, and one was paid $12,970 for a total of $40,933 from the COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) under Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. However, the County did not obtain price or rate quotes for the applicable vendors under the small purchase threshold as required per its purchasing policy or the federal requirements. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. The County did not have policies or procedures in place related to the suspension and debarment requirements for the SLFRF funds. Three covered transactions totaling $7,530,563 paid from the SLFRF funds were identified. Documentation to show that suspension and debarment was verified prior to entering into contracts with these three vendors could not be provided by the County. The amounts for which suspension and debarment were not verified for Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and the SLT-3157 directly from the U.S. Department of the Treasury were $27,963 and $7,502,600, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the transactions identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County's purchasing policy does not provide procedures on how the County will ensure the appropriate number of quotes will be obtained for small purchases or how the County will ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements. Effect Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the repayment or loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the County should develop procedures to ensure the appropriate procurement methods are used for items or services procured that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred when expending federal funds. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Finding Number: 2024-007 Procurement/Suspension and Debarment Procurement policy not followed and suspension and debarment checks not completed – Material weakness in internal controls, material noncompliance Assistance Listing Number: 93.193 Program Title: Urban Indian Health Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Indian Health Services Criteria: The Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR §§ 200.318–200.327 requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain written procurement policies and procedures that reflect applicable federal requirements and ensure compliance with federal procurement standards. These requirements apply regardless of the volume or frequency of procurement activity. In addition, 2 CFR § 200.213 and 2 CFR Part 180 require non-federal entities to ensure that they do not enter into covered transactions with vendors or contractors that are suspended or debarred and to have procedures in place to verify vendor eligibility prior to entering into such transactions. Condition: As a result of auditor testing, it was found that NACA did not follow written procurement policies and procedures during the audit period. Management indicated that procurement activity is limited and typically consists of routine or low-dollar purchases; however, no formal process existed to ensure that purchases made with federal funds complied with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Additionally, NACA did not have a documented process to verify whether vendors or contractors were suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions, nor was evidence of such verification retained. NACA did not have a control process to ensure oversight over procurement policies and over suspension and debarment checks. Cause: During the year ended December 31, 2024, NACA has limited administrative resources and believed that the infrequency and low dollar amount of procurement activity did not necessitate formal procurement policies or suspension and debarment procedures. Effect: Without a suspension and debarment verification process and failure to follow established procurement policies and procedures, NACA is at increased risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements, including the risk of entering into transactions with suspended or debarred vendors or failing to comply with applicable federal procurement standards. Recommendation: We recommend that NACA implement a process to obtain quotes for small purchases (individual purchases greater than $10,000) and to maintain documentation of those quotes. We also recommend that NACA implement a regular process for performing suspension and debarment checks for any vendors that are expected to be paid $25,000 or more on an annual basis and to maintain documentation of those checks. We also recommend NACA strengthen internal controls to ensure consistent adherence to existing procurement policies and procedures. This should include implementing monitoring or review controls to verify compliance with procurement requirements and ensuring that suspension and debarment checks are performed and documented for applicable transactions. Training may also be beneficial to reinforce staff understanding of procurement requirements and documentation expectations. Views of responsible officials: NACA concurs with the recommendation.

Federal Program/Award Identification: 10.525 Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network (FRSAN) Federal Award Project Number: 2020-70028-32729, 2023-70028-41283, and 2024-70028-43314 Federal Award Project Year: 2020 through 2026 Name of Federal Agency: United States Department of Agriculture Name of the Applicable Pass-Through Entity: National Institute of Food and Agriculture Criteria: The Organization is required to have a written procurement policy that reflects application of state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, as well as conforming to federal law and procurement standards per 2 CFR 200.318(a) of the Uniform Guidance. Condition: We noted that the Organization does not have a procurement policy that meets the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(a) of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization was unaware of what was required in the written policy. Effect or Potential Effect: Violations of 2 CFR 200.318(a) of the Uniform Guidance could occur. Questioned Costs: None Context: UHY reviewed the Organization’s procurement policy and determined it was not sufficient to meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200.318(a) of the Uniform Guidance Recommendation: We recommend the Organization establish a written procurement policy that meets the standards of 2 CFR 200.318(a) of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Correction Action: See “Management’s Response and Correction Active” plan section.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency Passed Through South Dakota Office of Emergency Management BRIC: Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities #97.047 Award # Not Provided Compliance Requirement – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness over Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non-federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. It requires a written procurement policy be adopted by the entities receiving federal funding and also requires that contractors and vendors are not suspended or debarred from doing federal work. Condition: The City has not adopted a formal policy related to procurement and does not have a control in place to monitor if the contractor was suspended or debarred from doing federal contract work. Cause: The City uses South Dakota Codified Law for guidance on procurement requirements but does not have a written policy as they were not aware that a written policy was required. Effect: The City will not follow federal requirements for procurement as the federal requirements do not line up with State requirements. Also, the City could enter into a contract with a contractor or vendor who is suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None Reported. Context/Sampling: One vendor contract was tested for procurement, suspension and debarment. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend the City adopt a written Procurement policy which follows the federal guidelines. We also recommend the City include in contract language that contractors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agreed with the finding.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Planning and Construction – 20.205 2024-005 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Policies Condition: The County does not have written policies and procedures in place for the procurement of contractors per 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114. The County does not have written standards of conduct that covers conflicts of interest and governs the performance of its employees engaged in the selection and administration of contracts per 2 CFR Section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR Sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16. Criteria: Policies and procedures for the procurement of service providers should be documented and maintained to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants. Policies should give all contractors and consultants (in-State and out-of-State) a fair opportunity to be considered for awards. Policies in place should also document standards to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection process. Cause: The County was not aware they were required to have written procurement policies and procedures. Effect: In the absence of procurement policies and procedures, conflicts of interest may exist, and bids may be inadequately obtained and awarded. Context: In a sample of three out of three highway planning and construction contracts the County followed procurement standards 2 CFR Part 200.318 – 200.327, 23 CFR Part 172, and 23 CFR Sections 635.104 & 635.114 when bidding and selecting contracts. Due to the estimated fee range, geographic location of the projects, and the Quality Based Selection Ranking for engineer services, the County does not believe the selection process would have changed if written policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors was in place. Therefore, there are no questioned costs. Recommendation: The County Board should draft and approve policies and procedures for the procurement of contractors per the Compliance Supplement, Code of Federal Regulations, United States Codes, and Federal Acquisition Regulations to ensure the proper advertisement and selection of contractors and consultants, and to prevent conflicts of interest during the selection of contractors and consultants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will draft and approve the recommended procurement policies and procedures and disseminate the information to department heads and County employees during the fall of 2025.

Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.318, general procurement standards, the entity must establish policies for procurement of services funded by federal funds. The procurement records and files for purchases in excess of the micro purchase threshold shall include at a minimum the following items: the basis for contractor selection, justification for lack of competition when competitive bids are not obtained, and basis for award cost or price. In addition, award recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. To ensure this is done, recipients should utilize the Excluded Parties List System website. Condition/Context: For our sample of one (representing the entire population), there was no documentation of policies and procedures for procurement of services funded by federal funds of $40,000. We determined for this program that rate quotations and rationale for limited competition was not retained for the vendor. It was also determined that there was no documentation retained regarding verification of vendor suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The entity has written policies including detailed levels of approvals for various vendors and purchases. However, the entity does not have policies and procedures designed for procurements under the Uniform Guidance, and therefore, there is not a formal process established to document the performance of such controls. We note that inadequate controls could result in a reasonable possibility that the entity would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Effect: Costs charged to federal awards without appropriate documentation of procurement policies and processes may be subject to disallowance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend developing written procurement policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and implementing a system of review and approval controls to complement the design of processes over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements. In addition, we recommend retaining documentation regarding procurement decisions including rate quotations and verification of vendor suspension and debarment checks. Views of Responsible Officials: The Entity agrees with the recommendation. The Entity will develop a formal procurement plan for federal expenditures which will include the specific processes for selecting vendors including documentation retention of the selection process. The policy will also include the process to be followed for verification of vendor suspension or debarment. At the time of the policy’s adoption by the Division, the document will be shared with all corps officers and program administrators throughout the Division. The Divisional Contract Compliance Manager will be responsible for identifying grants to which the policy would apply and to assist with retaining the documentation.

Federal Award Identification Assistance Listing Program Title Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Program Number 21.027 Federal Award ID Number and Year SLFRP1965 Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-Through Entity Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria The Health Department’s procurement policy states that documentation of procurements shall be retained for seven years and shall include all federally-required elements of procurement transactions. The Health Department’s procurement policy states that it will require all vendors to self-certify that they are not suspended or debarred. The Health Department is to then check that statement against the Federal System for Award Management. This policy is in compliance with 2 CFR 200.212; 2 CFR 200.318(h); 2 CFR 180.300; 48 CFR 52.209-6. Condition The Health Department did not retain evidence of its procurement of a covered transaction. The Health Department entered into a covered transaction prior to verifying whether the contractor was suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding No. Cause The Health Department did not have a system of controls in place to ensure that their procurement policy was followed. Effect or Potential Effect The Health Department may neglect to procure covered transactions. The Health Department may enter into a covered transaction with a debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded vendor. Questioned Costs No. Statistical Sample No. Context The Health Department entered into a covered transaction during the year to modernize its restrooms. The Health Department followed its procurement policy and requested proposals from an adequate number of vendors. However, despite repeated attempts to obtain multiple bids, the Health Department was only able to obtain a bid from single vendor. The Health Department proceeded with that bid, as evidenced by the publicly-available board minutes, but failed to follow its procurement policy as it pertains to 1) documentation retention requirements and 2) suspension and debarment. In testing this transaction, the auditor performed a search on the System for Award Management website, noting that the vendor is not on the exclusion list. Recommendation The auditor recommends that the Health Department establish a robust system of controls to ensure it complies with its procurement policy when entering into covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials See Corrective Action Plan, below.

FINDING 2024-004 PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DISBARMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Assistance Listing Number: 10.760 and 21.027 Grant Number: Various Grant Period: Various Criteria According to the Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must have written procurement policies and procedures that comply with federal regulations. These policies should ensure that procurements are conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, and that conflicts of interest are avoided. Condition During our audit, we noted that the City does not have documented procurement policies and procedures in place as required by the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200.318). Cause The City has not developed or implemented written procurement policies and procedures. Effect Without documented procurement policies, there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal procurement standards, potential conflicts of interest, and inefficient use of federal funds. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and implement written procurement policies and procedures that comply with the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest, procurement methods, and documentation requirements.

FINDING 2024-004 PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DISBARMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Assistance Listing Number: 10.760 and 21.027 Grant Number: Various Grant Period: Various Criteria According to the Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must have written procurement policies and procedures that comply with federal regulations. These policies should ensure that procurements are conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, and that conflicts of interest are avoided. Condition During our audit, we noted that the City does not have documented procurement policies and procedures in place as required by the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200.318). Cause The City has not developed or implemented written procurement policies and procedures. Effect Without documented procurement policies, there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal procurement standards, potential conflicts of interest, and inefficient use of federal funds. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and implement written procurement policies and procedures that comply with the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest, procurement methods, and documentation requirements.

FINDING 2024-004 PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION, AND DISBARMENT SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Assistance Listing Number: 10.760 and 21.027 Grant Number: Various Grant Period: Various Criteria According to the Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities must have written procurement policies and procedures that comply with federal regulations. These policies should ensure that procurements are conducted in a manner providing full and open competition, and that conflicts of interest are avoided. Condition During our audit, we noted that the City does not have documented procurement policies and procedures in place as required by the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200.318). Cause The City has not developed or implemented written procurement policies and procedures. Effect Without documented procurement policies, there is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal procurement standards, potential conflicts of interest, and inefficient use of federal funds. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop and implement written procurement policies and procedures that comply with the Uniform Guidance. These policies should include standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest, procurement methods, and documentation requirements.

Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standard identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327 and must be adhered to. Condition: During testing of the Organization’s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, we identified selected vendors the Organization did not have all the needed documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. The Organization also must enhance its current procurement policy. Cause: Controls and processes were not effectively designed to ensure there was all proper documentation around the procurement process and the suspension and debarment check. Effect: The Organization was not fully in compliance with the procurement and suspension and debarment check requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: None. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its current documented procurement policy, and its current processes and controls over procurement and suspension and debarment to ensure all required elements are included and the appropriate level of documentation is retained and available.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Finding 2024-003 Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Programs: Assistance Listing #15.657 Criteria or Specific Requirement: § 200.318 (i) General procurement standards, states that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Furthermore: §200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, states that procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when certain requirements have been met. Additionally, §200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award states that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The non- Federal entity must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, by (a) checking SAM Exclusions; (b) collecting a certification from that person; (c) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.Condition: During our audit, we noted contractual relationships under the Federal awards for which evidence of procurement procedures and documentation of SAM Exclusion checks were unavailable for our inspection. It is our understanding that some contracts were procured under noncompetitive (sole source) justification. However, in certain instances we were unable to review documentation detailing the history and rationale of the procurements. Cause: The Organization's processes in place during 2024 did not provide for the formalization and retention of procurement records and vendor screenings consistent with the expectations outlined in 2 CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization does not have a formal policy in place related to contractor screenings under CFR §200.213. Effect or Potential Effect: Purchases of goods and services could be made above the prevailing market rates if the prescribed procurement procedures are not adhered to. Additionally, the Organization may have inadvertently selected noncompetitive proposals method when the circumstances did not meet the requirements noted in § 200.320 (f) Methods of procurement to be followed, and thereby failing to administer full and open competition as required by the regulations. Finally, the Organization could inadvertently enter into a contractual relationship with an entity that is suspended, debarred or otherwise included on the US Federal sanction list. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The Organization failed to adhere to its procurement policy, and hence, noncompliance with Federal standards. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures. We consider our samples to be representative of the respective populations, and thus, are statistically valid samples. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Yes, continuation of Finding 2023-003 Recommendation: We then recommend that the Organization ensure its policy is distributed and communicated in a formal manner to its employees, and that management properly enforce compliance with its policy. All procurement actions should be clearly documented in writing and maintained in the vendor or contractor files. We also recommend that the Organization enhance its existing policy related to noncompetitive procurement to ensure include the five specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used under CFR 200.320. Additionally, we recommend that the Organization enhance its policies to include screening procedures related to 200.213 Reporting a determination that a non-Federal entity is not qualified for a Federal award.

Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM087513-01 - 2024 Award Period: September 30, 2023 through September 29, 2027 Type of Finding: • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: According to 2 CFR 200.318, non-federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures that reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, and conform to federal law and the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.327. Condition: During our review of the organization's procurement processes, it was noted that the organization does not have a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements. Specifically, the policy does not address key elements such as competition, cost or price analysis, and documentation requirements as outlined in federal regulations. Questioned costs: None Context: Policies exist, but do not meet requirements. There are no requirements to retain documentation related to comparison or analysis prior to purchase or procurement. Cause: The absence of a compliant procurement policy appears to be due to a lack of awareness of the specific federal requirements and the absence of a formal process to review and update organizational policies to ensure compliance. Effect: Without a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements, the organization is at risk of non-compliance with grant conditions, which could lead to questioned costs, potential disallowance of expenditures, and jeopardize future funding opportunities. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop and implement a procurement policy that complies with federal requirements, including provisions for competition, cost or price analysis, and proper documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.

Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2024-002 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed for the heating ventilation and cooling project, new roof, and electric vehicle charging stations. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Criteria: The following requirements are documented in 2 CFR 200-Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards (a) The Non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed (b) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.324 Contract Cost and Price (a) The Non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Todd Shurn, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority acknowledges the finding and is currently working to correct this.