Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Repeat finding 2023-001, 2022-001, and 2021-002 FAN 93.676 Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Child Nutrition Cluster Procurement and Suspension & Debarment Type of Finding: Non-Compliance U.S. Department of Health & Human Services U.S Department of Agriculture Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization had no findings for contracts procured during the last three fiscal years that were detail tested. However, the Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal programs for fiscal year ending August 31, 2024 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. In regards to progress made in reducing the number of vendors that are out of compliance, specifically vendors with over $50,000 of annual expenditures that were categorized as “legacy” vendors procured under the previous procurement policies, the Organization went from having 100 vendors totaling approximately $159 million in expenditures as of August 31, 2023, to 46 vendors totaling approximately $119 million as of August 31, 2024. This shows a decrease of 54% in the number of legacy vendors with a decrease of 25% in the dollar-value of the legacy vendors year over year. Further, the Organization continues to make progress in reducing legacy vendor non-compliance by reducing that number to 33 vendors totaling approximately $113 million as of January 2, 2025. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively getting all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 70 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars or with Child Nutrition Cluster Program revenue dollars, ten were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Contracts procured within the last three years show compliance with federal requirements based on detailed testing. Reprocuring all of the legacy contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should continue to review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name -93.233/93.837, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Research and Development Cluster 93.323, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - 93.233 - R01HL142116; 93.837 - U01HL146245 93.323 - 22680258J; 32680012K Pass-through Entity - 93.233 N/A (direct); 93.837 N/A (direct) 93.323 Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - Per 2 CFR 200.303(a), nonfederal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with the guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the nonfederal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Per 2 CFR 200.324(a), the nonfederal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the SAT, including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent upon the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation; but, as a starting point, the nonfederal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. Condition - Controls were not sufficient to establish written policies and procedures surrounding procured contracts and to ensure that the history of procurement decisions was documented, as required by 2 CFR 200. Questioned Costs - Research and Development Cluster - unknown ELC - unknown Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - N/A Context - Research and Development Cluster - For the four contracts tested, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Additionally, for the largest of the four contracts with activity of approximately $375,000, which is above the SAT established by FAR, management did not document its rationale for limiting competition, nor was management able to provide evidence that a cost-price analysis was performed. Finally, management has not formally documented an appropriate micropurchase or SAT threshold. ELC - For the three of the four contracts tested that were procured under noncompetitive means, management did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the contract type, or basis of the contract price. Further, for three out of four contracts tested under the Research and Development Cluster and all four contracts tested under ELC, management was unable to provide evidence that contractors were checked for suspension and debarment in advance of entering into a covered transaction. Because there was evidence that these contractors were not suspended or debarred, no questioned costs related to this noncompliance were identified. Cause and Effect - A lack of formal procurement policies and procedures, internally established procurement thresholds, or records in support of procurement decisions could result in material noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Recommendation - We recommend that management formalize procurement policies and procedures to demonstrate how the Institute will achieve compliance with standards identified in §§200.317 through 200.327. Additionally, we recommend management retain documented evidence that its policies and procedures were followed to ensure compliance with procurement standards. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan – Management agrees with the recommendation and will review the relevant guidance to ensure compliance. Necessary revisions will be made to the existing procurement policies and procedures in a timely manner to ensure that procurement decisions are documented, as required by 2 CFR Part 200.
Finding 2024-001: Written Procurement Policy This finding impacts the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement for the major program, Assistance Listing Number 10.555 National School Lunch Program (Child Nutrition Cluster) funded by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). Criteria: According to 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326., recipients of federal awards must adhere to specific procurement standards, including maintaining documented procurement procedures, ensuring oversight of contractors, and avoiding conflicts of interest. Condition: During the fiscal year 2024 compliance testing of Nurtury’s Nutrition program, it was noted that Nurtury’s procurement policy did not align with the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Context: Compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Nurtury has not updated its procurement policy to reflect the current Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: Failure to update the procurement policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance could result in questioned costs and findings related to Nurtury’s Federal programs. Was the finding a repeat of a finding in the immediate prior year?: No Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Nurtury should revise its procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Nurtury should implement procedures to periodically search for suspended or debarred vendors on Sam.gov to ensure compliance with federal guidelines. Management Response: Nurtury is in the process of updating its procurement policy to conform with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements. Management has confirmed in Sam.gov that none of their current vendors are suspended or debarred. The updated policy in development will ensure procedures to regularly search for suspended or debarred vendors on Sam.gov.
Finley School District No. 53 September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024 2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement requirements related to piggybacking. Assistance Listing Number and Title: Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553/555 – School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) Pass-through Award/Contract Number: 237WAWA3N11 237WAWA3N8903 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster program, which includes the School Breakfast and National School Lunch programs. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $632,822 to administer the programs during the 2023-2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local laws, either obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Competitive bidding may be waived through a process commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement before purchasing through another entity’s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the entity when selecting the contractor. In addition, the District must ensure it purchases the same goods or services as detailed in the awarding entity’s specifications and at the same specified price. Description of Condition The District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement standards. The District piggybacked onto a purchasing cooperative’s contract for dairy products; however, because it was an adjustable price contract with monthly pricing changes, it did not have a process to ensure it purchased the same goods and at the same price as detailed in the purchasing cooperatives contract. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District experienced turnover in the position responsible for reviewing and approving purchases. The District did not provide adequate training the new staff, so they did not know they needed to verify the goods and prices matched the current contract pricing schedule. Effect of Condition The District spent $59,526 of program funds for dairy products. Without effective internal controls that ensure it follows procurement or piggybacking procedures, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with applicable federal procurement requirements and received the current contract price for the food products. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure it complies with applicable procurement requirements for purchases of goods and services, including ensuring it received the current contract price. We also recommend the District provide adequate training to employees responsible for the procurement process. District’s Response The Finley School District has put in place internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement requirements related to piggybacking: The Food Service Director will compare invoices to the monthly price list to ensure contract pricing is used and initial invoices once reviewed. If there are discrepancies, the Food Service Director will contact the vendor for corrections. Quarterly, the Business Manager will select a sample of invoices to review for compliance. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve the issue. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Finley School District No. 53 September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024 2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement requirements related to piggybacking. Assistance Listing Number and Title: Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553/555 – School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) Pass-through Award/Contract Number: 237WAWA3N11 237WAWA3N8903 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster program, which includes the School Breakfast and National School Lunch programs. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $632,822 to administer the programs during the 2023-2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local laws, either obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Competitive bidding may be waived through a process commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement before purchasing through another entity’s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the entity when selecting the contractor. In addition, the District must ensure it purchases the same goods or services as detailed in the awarding entity’s specifications and at the same specified price. Description of Condition The District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement standards. The District piggybacked onto a purchasing cooperative’s contract for dairy products; however, because it was an adjustable price contract with monthly pricing changes, it did not have a process to ensure it purchased the same goods and at the same price as detailed in the purchasing cooperatives contract. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District experienced turnover in the position responsible for reviewing and approving purchases. The District did not provide adequate training the new staff, so they did not know they needed to verify the goods and prices matched the current contract pricing schedule. Effect of Condition The District spent $59,526 of program funds for dairy products. Without effective internal controls that ensure it follows procurement or piggybacking procedures, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with applicable federal procurement requirements and received the current contract price for the food products. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure it complies with applicable procurement requirements for purchases of goods and services, including ensuring it received the current contract price. We also recommend the District provide adequate training to employees responsible for the procurement process. District’s Response The Finley School District has put in place internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement requirements related to piggybacking: The Food Service Director will compare invoices to the monthly price list to ensure contract pricing is used and initial invoices once reviewed. If there are discrepancies, the Food Service Director will contact the vendor for corrections. Quarterly, the Business Manager will select a sample of invoices to review for compliance. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve the issue. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Finley School District No. 53 September 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024 2024-001 The District did not have adequate internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement requirements related to piggybacking. Assistance Listing Number and Title: Child Nutrition Cluster – ALN 10.553/555 – School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program Federal Grantor Name: Department of Agriculture Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) Pass-through Award/Contract Number: 237WAWA3N11 237WAWA3N8903 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster program, which includes the School Breakfast and National School Lunch programs. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $632,822 to administer the programs during the 2023-2024 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local laws, either obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Competitive bidding may be waived through a process commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement before purchasing through another entity’s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the entity when selecting the contractor. In addition, the District must ensure it purchases the same goods or services as detailed in the awarding entity’s specifications and at the same specified price. Description of Condition The District’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement standards. The District piggybacked onto a purchasing cooperative’s contract for dairy products; however, because it was an adjustable price contract with monthly pricing changes, it did not have a process to ensure it purchased the same goods and at the same price as detailed in the purchasing cooperatives contract. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District experienced turnover in the position responsible for reviewing and approving purchases. The District did not provide adequate training the new staff, so they did not know they needed to verify the goods and prices matched the current contract pricing schedule. Effect of Condition The District spent $59,526 of program funds for dairy products. Without effective internal controls that ensure it follows procurement or piggybacking procedures, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with applicable federal procurement requirements and received the current contract price for the food products. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure it complies with applicable procurement requirements for purchases of goods and services, including ensuring it received the current contract price. We also recommend the District provide adequate training to employees responsible for the procurement process. District’s Response The Finley School District has put in place internal controls to ensure compliance with procurement requirements related to piggybacking: The Food Service Director will compare invoices to the monthly price list to ensure contract pricing is used and initial invoices once reviewed. If there are discrepancies, the Food Service Director will contact the vendor for corrections. Quarterly, the Business Manager will select a sample of invoices to review for compliance. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the District’s commitment to resolve the issue. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 -200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services.Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids was not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-003 Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 -200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services.Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids was not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-003 Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 -200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services.Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids was not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-003 Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Health Center Program Cluster AL No. 93.224 and 93.527 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H80CS00438, H8FCS40427, H8GCS47600 Healthy Start Initiative AL No. 93.926 Us. Department of Health and Human Services Award No. H49MC00156 Criteria: The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements as indicated in 2 CFR 200.318 -200.326 and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services.Condition: During the testing performed, it was determined that documentation to support quotes, estimates, or closed bids was not maintained prior to entering into contracts. Additionally, documentation was not maintained to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Cause: The Organization has designed internal controls over these areas; however, the controls did not operate as designed. Effect: Purchases were made that did not adhere to the Organization’s procurement, suspension and debarment policy. Questioned costs: n/a Context: The Organization did not maintain supporting documentation that management obtained price or rate quotes for purchases above the micro-purchase threshold. In addition, the Health Center did not maintain documentation to support that the vendors were not suspended or debarred, however subsequent testing verified that none of the vendors selected for review were suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2023-003 Recommendation: The Organization should review and update the procurement and suspension and debarment policies. Additionally, the Organization should provide training to staff on transactions that are covered by the procurement, suspension and debarment policies. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding. Staff will be trained to ensure future procurement, suspension and debarment transactions are identified and documentation is maintained to support the evaluation.
Finding 2024-004: Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Noncompliance with Internal Procurement Authorization Controls Program name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Assistance Listing: 10.558 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education, District of Columbia Education Office Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. As required under 2 CFR Subpart D (§§200.317–200.327), organizations must follow written procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards in the Uniform Guidance. The Organization’s internal procurement policy includes specific thresholds for contract approvals and designates levels of review and signature authority based on the contract value. Adherence to these internal controls is essential to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements and appropriate stewardship of federal funds. Condition: During our testing of procurement activity, we noted that a procurement contract was executed by an individual who did not have the delegated authority to approve or sign the agreement, as required by the Organization’s internal procurement policy. The contract amount exceeded the individual’s approval threshold. The policy’s required internal approval levels were not followed prior to execution. Cause: This issue appears to have resulted from a breakdown in adherence to established internal control procedures, possibly due to a lack of training or oversight. The Organization’s procurement policy was in place and compliant with 2 CFR requirements, but it was not enforced in practice. Effect: Noncompliance with internal procurement approval controls increases the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate spending, lack of transparency, and potential ineligibility of costs charged to federal programs. While the transaction itself may ultimately be allowable, failure to follow established approval protocols constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Questioned costs: None identified, as the expenditure appeared otherwise allowable. However, the control deficiency presents a risk for future noncompliance. Perspective: We selected two procurement transactions from a population of four procurement transactions from this program. The issue reflects a control failure affecting procurement activity across federally funded programs and may result in future questioned costs if not corrected. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow up with the relevant parties to ensure proper reporting requirements are met on a timely basis. Management’s response and corrective action plan (unaudited): See corrective action plan.
Finding 2024-004: Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Noncompliance with Internal Procurement Authorization Controls Program name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Assistance Listing: 10.558 Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Pass-through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education, District of Columbia Education Office Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.318(a), non-federal entities must establish and maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. As required under 2 CFR Subpart D (§§200.317–200.327), organizations must follow written procurement procedures that reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards in the Uniform Guidance. The Organization’s internal procurement policy includes specific thresholds for contract approvals and designates levels of review and signature authority based on the contract value. Adherence to these internal controls is essential to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements and appropriate stewardship of federal funds. Condition: During our testing of procurement activity, we noted that a procurement contract was executed by an individual who did not have the delegated authority to approve or sign the agreement, as required by the Organization’s internal procurement policy. The contract amount exceeded the individual’s approval threshold. The policy’s required internal approval levels were not followed prior to execution. Cause: This issue appears to have resulted from a breakdown in adherence to established internal control procedures, possibly due to a lack of training or oversight. The Organization’s procurement policy was in place and compliant with 2 CFR requirements, but it was not enforced in practice. Effect: Noncompliance with internal procurement approval controls increases the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate spending, lack of transparency, and potential ineligibility of costs charged to federal programs. While the transaction itself may ultimately be allowable, failure to follow established approval protocols constitutes a significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Questioned costs: None identified, as the expenditure appeared otherwise allowable. However, the control deficiency presents a risk for future noncompliance. Perspective: We selected two procurement transactions from a population of four procurement transactions from this program. The issue reflects a control failure affecting procurement activity across federally funded programs and may result in future questioned costs if not corrected. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization follow up with the relevant parties to ensure proper reporting requirements are met on a timely basis. Management’s response and corrective action plan (unaudited): See corrective action plan.
Finding Reference: 2024-002 – Procurement Policies and Procedures Federal Agency: U.S Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal System for Rural Communities - ALN# 10.760 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, suspension, and debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The Authority does not have any documented procurement procedures. However, during our testing of compliance with procurement guidelines, no further deviations from federal guidelines were noted. This is a repeat finding finding from the prior year. Cause and Effect: The Authority was unacquainted with general procurement standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Without documented procurement procedures, it is difficult for the Authority to ensure compliance with relevant compliance requirements. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: The Authority should establish documented procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The federal project that has been in the works for multiple years, and, as a result, the Authority determined established procurement procedures would not be written and approved. The Authority did not make this decision in haste. The Authority met compliance guidelines for the procedures of items during the project. What we lack is an approved written document, which at this time is something we do not have the resources to undertake.
Finding Reference: 2024-002 – Procurement Policies and Procedures Federal Agency: U.S Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal System for Rural Communities - ALN# 10.760 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, suspension, and debarment Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities must have and use documented procedures consistent with laws and regulations and the standards for the acquisition of property or services under a federal award or subaward in accordance with 2 CFR 200.318. Additionally, the non-federal entity is required to follow formal procurement methods when the value of the procurement property or service under a federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320. Condition: The Authority does not have any documented procurement procedures. However, during our testing of compliance with procurement guidelines, no further deviations from federal guidelines were noted. This is a repeat finding finding from the prior year. Cause and Effect: The Authority was unacquainted with general procurement standards of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Without documented procurement procedures, it is difficult for the Authority to ensure compliance with relevant compliance requirements. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: The Authority should establish documented procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The federal project that has been in the works for multiple years, and, as a result, the Authority determined established procurement procedures would not be written and approved. The Authority did not make this decision in haste. The Authority met compliance guidelines for the procedures of items during the project. What we lack is an approved written document, which at this time is something we do not have the resources to undertake.
Finding 2024-004 Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and immaterial noncompliance. Federal Award Program: HUD Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Assistance Listing #14.181) Compliance Requirement: Procurement Criteria: Pursuant to the Uniform Guidance, for procurements of goods and services made with federal awards, River Kourt Apartments is required to have policies in place that conform with the Procurement Standards as prescribed in 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. River Kourt Apartments is required to follow the methods of procurement as prescribed in 2 CFR §200.320. Condition: River Kourt Apartments has written policies and procedures regarding the procurement of goods and services; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Cause: River Kourt Apartments has written policies and procedures regarding the procurement of goods and services; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Effect of Condition: This increases risk that River Kourt Apartments would not materially comply with the procurement requirement for the major program. Questioned Costs: None. Context: There were no procurements over the de minimis threshold made during the year period ended June 30, 2024; however, the written procedures did not include all required elements regarding procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Repeat Finding: Yes, see Finding 2023-003. Recommendation: We recommend management revise the current policies and procedures to include all required elements for procurement procedures pursuant to 2 CFR §200.318 through §200.320. Procurement methods shall follow the methods as prescribed in 2 CFR §200.320. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Significant Deficiencies 2024-004 Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, School Lunch Program Supply Chain- COVID 19 Assistance Listing numbers 10.553 and 10.555) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of various vendors, we noted that the District is not following its procurement procedures for the Child Nutrition program purchases and is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performed required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District will review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that the procurement procedures are being followed and perform a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This was identified as part of the Administrative Review conducted in November 2023 by the NYS Education Department (Child Nutrition Program). The District has already started the process of working on corrective action.
Significant Deficiencies 2024-004 Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, School Lunch Program Supply Chain- COVID 19 Assistance Listing numbers 10.553 and 10.555) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of various vendors, we noted that the District is not following its procurement procedures for the Child Nutrition program purchases and is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performed required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District will review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that the procurement procedures are being followed and perform a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This was identified as part of the Administrative Review conducted in November 2023 by the NYS Education Department (Child Nutrition Program). The District has already started the process of working on corrective action.
Significant Deficiencies 2024-004 Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, School Lunch Program Supply Chain- COVID 19 Assistance Listing numbers 10.553 and 10.555) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of various vendors, we noted that the District is not following its procurement procedures for the Child Nutrition program purchases and is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performed required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District will review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that the procurement procedures are being followed and perform a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This was identified as part of the Administrative Review conducted in November 2023 by the NYS Education Department (Child Nutrition Program). The District has already started the process of working on corrective action.
Significant Deficiencies 2024-004 Child Nutrition Cluster – Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Cluster (National School Breakfast Program, School Lunch Program, School Lunch Program Supply Chain- COVID 19 Assistance Listing numbers 10.553 and 10.555) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of various vendors, we noted that the District is not following its procurement procedures for the Child Nutrition program purchases and is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performed required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the school lunch fund and therefore represented purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District will review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that the procurement procedures are being followed and perform a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. This was identified as part of the Administrative Review conducted in November 2023 by the NYS Education Department (Child Nutrition Program). The District has already started the process of working on corrective action.
Special Education Cluster – Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (Special Education – Grants to State (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education – Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) Assistance Listing numbers 84.027 and 84.173) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of various vendors, we noted that the District is not following its procurement procedures for the Special Education program purchases and is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performed required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the special education cluster and therefore represents purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: As of November 1, 2024, the District will have implemented a process to determine the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities prior to disbursing funds.
Special Education Cluster – Procurement Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education Special Education Cluster (Special Education – Grants to State (IDEA, Part B) and Special Education – Preschool Grants (IDEA Preschool) Assistance Listing numbers 84.027 and 84.173) passed through the New York State Education Department. Criteria: CFR Section 200.318 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Part 200 Subpart D. Additionally, 2 CFR Section 200.213 stipulates that no awards, subawards, or contracts be awarded to parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management and testing of various vendors, we noted that the District is not following its procurement procedures for the Special Education program purchases and is not verifying the eligibility of vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs on an annual basis. Statement of Cause: The District did not review compliance requirements related to procurement outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.318 and Section 200.213. Statement of Effect: The District is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.213. The District is not performed required procedures, as a result, vendors that are not eligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities could be selected or the District could be overpaying for goods and services. Questioned Costs: None Perspective Information: As part of required procurement testing, a review of vendors charged to the special education cluster and therefore represents purchases with federal dollars was performed. Of the District’s vendors charged to the fund, none were suspended or debarred from participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.213 and ensure that their procurement procedures are being followed and that a review of the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities is performed prior to disbursing funds to the vendor. Views of the Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: As of November 1, 2024, the District will have implemented a process to determine the eligibility of potential vendors to participate in Federal assistance programs or activities prior to disbursing funds.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
Criteria: Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 200.320, require the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. For “small purchases,” those where the aggregate dollar amount is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Condition: During our testing of procurement, we sampled four contracts that would qualify as “small purchases.” The district could not provide evidence that multiple quotes had been obtained prior to selecting any of the vendors. Cause: Due to turnover at the District, there has been a lack of oversight to ensure all appropriate documentation is maintained to demonstrate that the District is in compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and that purchases are awarded after a reasonable number of quotes have been obtained. Context: Deficiency was noted in all four contracts tested. Effect/Questioned Cost: This resulted in roughly $122,215 awarded in contracts, without following proper procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the District train and implement the required federal procurement procedures to ensure that the District is in compliance. In addition, we recommend that the District adopt a board policy that addresses procedures related to federal procurement. Views of Responsible Officials: The Purchasing department will develop and maintain procurement procedures requiring that “small purchases” of equipment or services made under a Federal award or sub-award above the micropurchase threshold require multiple quotes and that those quotes are properly documented as evidence.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the one small purchase method procurement sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $77,700 for food service equipment maintenance in FY23. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the one small purchase method procurement sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $77,700 for food service equipment maintenance in FY23. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the one small purchase method procurement sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $77,700 for food service equipment maintenance in FY23. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
FINDING 2024-003 Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Summer Food Service Program for Children Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: For the one small purchase method procurement sampled for testing, we noted that the School Corporation, did not obtain quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources. The sample item amount disbursed was $77,700 for food service equipment maintenance in FY23. The School Corporation did properly perform a suspension and debarment check on the vendor. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Written Procurement Policy This finding impacts the procurement and suspension and debarment compliance requirement for the major program, Assistance Listing Number 84.282, Charter Schools, funded by U.S. Department of Education, passed through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). Criteria: The School must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. The School also must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: During our compliance testing, we reviewed the School's procurement policy against Uniform Guidance standards. The policy did not meet all of the considerations that are required through Federal, Uniform Guidance, and state regulations. The School followed their procurement policy during fiscal year 2024, but should update this policy in accordance with these regulations Context: Compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The School’s existing procurement policy was not updated to include all of the elements required by the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance, potentially resulting in a decrease in Federal funding and allow for purchases that are not completed under the approved procurement standards. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs identified. Was the finding a repeat of a finding in the immediately prior year?: No Recommendation: AAFCPAs recommends that management revise their policy to comply with current standards under the Uniform Guidance. Management’s Response: The current School policy was adopted at opening based on DESE recommended Fiscal Policy and Procedures. Given the analysis of the current policy as compared to the Uniform Guidance policy, the School policy will be updated to ensure compliance going forward. This policy will be reviewed by the Finance Committee and then brought to the full Board for approval no later than January 2025.
Programs Affected 21.027 COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria 2 CFR 200.318 requires that non-federal entities must maintain written standards establishing its procurement policies. Additionally, CFR 200.214 requires that non-federal entities establish internal controls to restrict transactions with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition and Context Through our compliance testing, it was noted that the Organization did not compare recipients of federal funds to the exclusion database of the Office of Inspector General for disbursements during the year ended June 30, 2024. Additionally, the Organization did not establish written policies regarding procurements and conflicts of interest. Cause and Effect The conditions identified were a result of the Organization not establishing policies and procedures to help ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. The non statistical sample of 20 recipients of federal funds did not identify any recipients of federal funds who were excluded parties. Questioned Costs N/A Identification of Repeat Findings N/A Recommendation We recommend the Organization perform a comparison of all recipients of federal funds to the Office of Inspector General's database to ensure all are permitted to receive grant funding prior to issuance of payment. The search results should be documented. We also recommend the Organization establish a written procurement policy and conflict of interest policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management agrees with the finding. See attached Planned Corrective Actions.
Programs Affected 21.027 COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria 2 CFR 200.318 requires that non-federal entities must maintain written standards establishing its procurement policies. Additionally, CFR 200.214 requires that non-federal entities establish internal controls to restrict transactions with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition and Context Through our compliance testing, it was noted that the Organization did not compare recipients of federal funds to the exclusion database of the Office of Inspector General for disbursements during the year ended June 30, 2024. Additionally, the Organization did not establish written policies regarding procurements and conflicts of interest. Cause and Effect The conditions identified were a result of the Organization not establishing policies and procedures to help ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. The non statistical sample of 20 recipients of federal funds did not identify any recipients of federal funds who were excluded parties. Questioned Costs N/A Identification of Repeat Findings N/A Recommendation We recommend the Organization perform a comparison of all recipients of federal funds to the Office of Inspector General's database to ensure all are permitted to receive grant funding prior to issuance of payment. The search results should be documented. We also recommend the Organization establish a written procurement policy and conflict of interest policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Management agrees with the finding. See attached Planned Corrective Actions.