Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?200.318, a non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards. Furthermore, ?200.213 states non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During audit procedures performed, we noted that the Chamber does not have a specific policy on procurement or suspension and debarment, and does not have procedures in place to ensure that it complies with federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The Chamber lacks specific policies on procurement or suspension and debarment, and does not have procedures in place to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements. Cause: The Chamber was unaware of the policy requirements as this is the first single audit the Chamber has been through in addition to the speed in which the funds were spent due to COVID-19 and the emergency it created for businesses in the area. Effect: Failure of the Chamber to comply with the audit requirements may constitute a violation of the contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. Recommendation: We recommend that the Chamber adopt a procurement and suspension and debarment policy that is in accordance with the requirements established by the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, we recommend that these policies are approved by the board of directors. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P425F202063-20B and 2022 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 2021-2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter 2 Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires Universities to have a written procurement policy that includes certain requirements as it relates to procuring good and services using federal dollars. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.995 requires that the University has a written policy where Universities should perform a check to ensure vendors are not debarred. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the University has a written procurement policy in place starting July 2021 and revised in February 2022. During review of the procurement policy, it was noted it was missing required procedures for the procurement of goods over $250,000. Also, it was noted during testing that there was no support to show the University verified the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None. Context: A tracking and documentation system was implemented for the suspension and debarment process. However, the documentation is not retained after the SAM.gov check is performed. Cause: The University experienced turnover during the year, and supporting documentation was not accessible to provide evidence of the check being performed. evidence retained to show that as of the time of check the vendor was not debarred/suspended. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Recommendation: We recommend that the University establish a process where when the SAM.gov check is performed, evidence is retained to show that this was completed. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding No. 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment ? Significant Deficiency (Program Level) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (93.318) Protecting and Improving Health Globally: Building and Strengthening Public Health Impact, Systems, Capacity and Security Condition: During testing the Federation?s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, the Federation could not provide a procurement policy that is in compliance with prescribed standards in the Uniform Guidance. Context: The Federation currently does not have a procurement policy that complies with Uniform Guidance) requirements nor addresses the applicable sections codified in Chapter 2 Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.320 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of section ?200.320 and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. 2 CFR Section 200.320 defines informal procurement methods, including micro-purchase thresholds, formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement methods. Cause: The Federation has not updated its procurement policy in order to specifically reference Uniform Guidance and to include prescribed applicable thresholds to be complied with. Effect: The Federation was not in compliance with the procurement policy requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Federation could not provide a procurement policy compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned costs: None. Repeat Finding?: No. Recommendation: The Federation should establish a procurement policy that addresses Uniform Guidance and required documentation. Views of Responsible Individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the National School Lunch Program and the Summer Food Service Program for Children. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $1,070,704 to administer these programs during the 2021-2022 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition Procurement Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state laws and local policies. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive requirements applicable to the purchase. For goods and supplies costing more than $75,000, state purchase requirements would require the District to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. Additionally, state and federal requirements, as well as the District?s policy, allow it to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement or cooperative. When piggybacking, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from another entity?s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the District when selecting the contractor. Our audit found the District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the District piggybacked onto another government?s contract to purchase food items, but it did not retain supporting documentation showing it verified the awarding government followed applicable procurement requirements before purchasing. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the District contracts for goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that contractors have not been suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded, from participating in federal programs. This verification may be accomplished by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, inserting a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The District must perform this verification before entering into the contract, and it must maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance. Our audit found the District did not have adequate controls in place to verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The District had turnover in program staff at the beginning of the 2021-2022 school year. Employees did not know they needed to obtain procurement documentation from the awarding agency to verify the process complied with procurement requirements before purchasing. Although the District has an established affidavit process that staff are supposed to use for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred, new employees were not aware of the process or the requirement to verify a contractor?s status. Effect of Condition The District piggybacked onto another agency?s contract, and it spent $212,609 of federal funds to purchase food items from one food service contractor. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with piggybacking requirements, and cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition. The District also did not obtain written certifications, insert clauses into the contracts, or check SAM.gov to verify two contractors paid $268,920 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting or purchasing. Without adequate internal controls, the District cannot ensure the contractors were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. This should include retaining documentation supporting its compliance with program requirements. We also recommend the District provide training to staff responsible for program requirements. District?s Response During the 2021-2022 school year, Granite Falls School District failed to demonstrate that suspension and debarment requirements were met in the child Nutrition program. The Child Nutrition program ?piggyback? on two contracts used by numerous other districts to purchase food for the program. Even though these vendors have been vetted by many other school districts and the contacts did not originate with Granite Falls, we are still required to ensure that these vendors meet the suspension and debarment requirement. During the 2021-2022 school year, we transitioned to a new supervisor in that department and during the change-over, we neglected to confirm that even though these were contracts from other agencies, we still had to verify suspension and debarment. We have a good system in place currently where all contacts sign an attestation confirming they meet the suspension and debarment requirements. Child Nutrition now understands that they need to use this attestation on all contracts even if they do not originate from Granite Falls. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District has taken to resolve this issue and will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the National School Lunch Program and the Summer Food Service Program for Children. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $1,070,704 to administer these programs during the 2021-2022 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition Procurement Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state laws and local policies. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive requirements applicable to the purchase. For goods and supplies costing more than $75,000, state purchase requirements would require the District to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. Additionally, state and federal requirements, as well as the District?s policy, allow it to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement or cooperative. When piggybacking, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from another entity?s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the District when selecting the contractor. Our audit found the District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the District piggybacked onto another government?s contract to purchase food items, but it did not retain supporting documentation showing it verified the awarding government followed applicable procurement requirements before purchasing. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the District contracts for goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that contractors have not been suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded, from participating in federal programs. This verification may be accomplished by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, inserting a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The District must perform this verification before entering into the contract, and it must maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance. Our audit found the District did not have adequate controls in place to verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The District had turnover in program staff at the beginning of the 2021-2022 school year. Employees did not know they needed to obtain procurement documentation from the awarding agency to verify the process complied with procurement requirements before purchasing. Although the District has an established affidavit process that staff are supposed to use for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred, new employees were not aware of the process or the requirement to verify a contractor?s status. Effect of Condition The District piggybacked onto another agency?s contract, and it spent $212,609 of federal funds to purchase food items from one food service contractor. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with piggybacking requirements, and cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition. The District also did not obtain written certifications, insert clauses into the contracts, or check SAM.gov to verify two contractors paid $268,920 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting or purchasing. Without adequate internal controls, the District cannot ensure the contractors were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. This should include retaining documentation supporting its compliance with program requirements. We also recommend the District provide training to staff responsible for program requirements. District?s Response During the 2021-2022 school year, Granite Falls School District failed to demonstrate that suspension and debarment requirements were met in the child Nutrition program. The Child Nutrition program ?piggyback? on two contracts used by numerous other districts to purchase food for the program. Even though these vendors have been vetted by many other school districts and the contacts did not originate with Granite Falls, we are still required to ensure that these vendors meet the suspension and debarment requirement. During the 2021-2022 school year, we transitioned to a new supervisor in that department and during the change-over, we neglected to confirm that even though these were contracts from other agencies, we still had to verify suspension and debarment. We have a good system in place currently where all contacts sign an attestation confirming they meet the suspension and debarment requirements. Child Nutrition now understands that they need to use this attestation on all contracts even if they do not originate from Granite Falls. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District has taken to resolve this issue and will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the National School Lunch Program and the Summer Food Service Program for Children. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $1,070,704 to administer these programs during the 2021-2022 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition Procurement Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state laws and local policies. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive requirements applicable to the purchase. For goods and supplies costing more than $75,000, state purchase requirements would require the District to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. Additionally, state and federal requirements, as well as the District?s policy, allow it to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement or cooperative. When piggybacking, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from another entity?s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the District when selecting the contractor. Our audit found the District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the District piggybacked onto another government?s contract to purchase food items, but it did not retain supporting documentation showing it verified the awarding government followed applicable procurement requirements before purchasing. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the District contracts for goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that contractors have not been suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded, from participating in federal programs. This verification may be accomplished by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, inserting a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The District must perform this verification before entering into the contract, and it must maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance. Our audit found the District did not have adequate controls in place to verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The District had turnover in program staff at the beginning of the 2021-2022 school year. Employees did not know they needed to obtain procurement documentation from the awarding agency to verify the process complied with procurement requirements before purchasing. Although the District has an established affidavit process that staff are supposed to use for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred, new employees were not aware of the process or the requirement to verify a contractor?s status. Effect of Condition The District piggybacked onto another agency?s contract, and it spent $212,609 of federal funds to purchase food items from one food service contractor. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with piggybacking requirements, and cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition. The District also did not obtain written certifications, insert clauses into the contracts, or check SAM.gov to verify two contractors paid $268,920 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting or purchasing. Without adequate internal controls, the District cannot ensure the contractors were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. This should include retaining documentation supporting its compliance with program requirements. We also recommend the District provide training to staff responsible for program requirements. District?s Response During the 2021-2022 school year, Granite Falls School District failed to demonstrate that suspension and debarment requirements were met in the child Nutrition program. The Child Nutrition program ?piggyback? on two contracts used by numerous other districts to purchase food for the program. Even though these vendors have been vetted by many other school districts and the contacts did not originate with Granite Falls, we are still required to ensure that these vendors meet the suspension and debarment requirement. During the 2021-2022 school year, we transitioned to a new supervisor in that department and during the change-over, we neglected to confirm that even though these were contracts from other agencies, we still had to verify suspension and debarment. We have a good system in place currently where all contacts sign an attestation confirming they meet the suspension and debarment requirements. Child Nutrition now understands that they need to use this attestation on all contracts even if they do not originate from Granite Falls. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District has taken to resolve this issue and will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Criteria (continued) Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for nonprocurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization was unable to support adherence to procurement policies for several active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2022. Specifically, the Organization failed to maintain documentation history of procurement for four out of the twenty-six active contracts tested that were either paid in full or in part by the Unaccompanied Alien Children Program. All of these contracts were procured at least three years previous. For three of the four contracts the winning proposal and proper approval for the contact was maintained, but no other procurement documentation. For the other contract no procurement history maintained. There were no errors found in any of the contract samples that were procured under the Organization’s current procurement policies. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified as all services/goods under these contracts were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to these vendors. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?200.318, a non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards. Furthermore, ?200.213 states non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During audit procedures performed, we noted that the Chamber does not have a specific policy on procurement or suspension and debarment, and does not have procedures in place to ensure that it complies with federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: The Chamber lacks specific policies on procurement or suspension and debarment, and does not have procedures in place to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements. Cause: The Chamber was unaware of the policy requirements as this is the first single audit the Chamber has been through in addition to the speed in which the funds were spent due to COVID-19 and the emergency it created for businesses in the area. Effect: Failure of the Chamber to comply with the audit requirements may constitute a violation of the contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. Recommendation: We recommend that the Chamber adopt a procurement and suspension and debarment policy that is in accordance with the requirements established by the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, we recommend that these policies are approved by the board of directors. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Federal Award Identification Number and Year: P425F202063-20B and 2022 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 2021-2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter 2 Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires Universities to have a written procurement policy that includes certain requirements as it relates to procuring good and services using federal dollars. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.995 requires that the University has a written policy where Universities should perform a check to ensure vendors are not debarred. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the University has a written procurement policy in place starting July 2021 and revised in February 2022. During review of the procurement policy, it was noted it was missing required procedures for the procurement of goods over $250,000. Also, it was noted during testing that there was no support to show the University verified the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs: None. Context: A tracking and documentation system was implemented for the suspension and debarment process. However, the documentation is not retained after the SAM.gov check is performed. Cause: The University experienced turnover during the year, and supporting documentation was not accessible to provide evidence of the check being performed. evidence retained to show that as of the time of check the vendor was not debarred/suspended. Repeat Finding: Yes, 2021-002 Recommendation: We recommend that the University establish a process where when the SAM.gov check is performed, evidence is retained to show that this was completed. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding No. 2022-001: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment ? Significant Deficiency (Program Level) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (93.318) Protecting and Improving Health Globally: Building and Strengthening Public Health Impact, Systems, Capacity and Security Condition: During testing the Federation?s controls on compliance over procurement and suspension and debarment, the Federation could not provide a procurement policy that is in compliance with prescribed standards in the Uniform Guidance. Context: The Federation currently does not have a procurement policy that complies with Uniform Guidance) requirements nor addresses the applicable sections codified in Chapter 2 Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Criteria: 2 CFR Section 200.318 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR Section 200.320 requires that the non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of section ?200.320 and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. 2 CFR Section 200.320 defines informal procurement methods, including micro-purchase thresholds, formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement methods. Cause: The Federation has not updated its procurement policy in order to specifically reference Uniform Guidance and to include prescribed applicable thresholds to be complied with. Effect: The Federation was not in compliance with the procurement policy requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Federation could not provide a procurement policy compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned costs: None. Repeat Finding?: No. Recommendation: The Federation should establish a procurement policy that addresses Uniform Guidance and required documentation. Views of Responsible Individuals: Management concurs with and will implement the recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the National School Lunch Program and the Summer Food Service Program for Children. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $1,070,704 to administer these programs during the 2021-2022 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition Procurement Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state laws and local policies. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive requirements applicable to the purchase. For goods and supplies costing more than $75,000, state purchase requirements would require the District to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. Additionally, state and federal requirements, as well as the District?s policy, allow it to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement or cooperative. When piggybacking, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from another entity?s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the District when selecting the contractor. Our audit found the District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the District piggybacked onto another government?s contract to purchase food items, but it did not retain supporting documentation showing it verified the awarding government followed applicable procurement requirements before purchasing. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the District contracts for goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that contractors have not been suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded, from participating in federal programs. This verification may be accomplished by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, inserting a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The District must perform this verification before entering into the contract, and it must maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance. Our audit found the District did not have adequate controls in place to verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The District had turnover in program staff at the beginning of the 2021-2022 school year. Employees did not know they needed to obtain procurement documentation from the awarding agency to verify the process complied with procurement requirements before purchasing. Although the District has an established affidavit process that staff are supposed to use for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred, new employees were not aware of the process or the requirement to verify a contractor?s status. Effect of Condition The District piggybacked onto another agency?s contract, and it spent $212,609 of federal funds to purchase food items from one food service contractor. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with piggybacking requirements, and cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition. The District also did not obtain written certifications, insert clauses into the contracts, or check SAM.gov to verify two contractors paid $268,920 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting or purchasing. Without adequate internal controls, the District cannot ensure the contractors were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. This should include retaining documentation supporting its compliance with program requirements. We also recommend the District provide training to staff responsible for program requirements. District?s Response During the 2021-2022 school year, Granite Falls School District failed to demonstrate that suspension and debarment requirements were met in the child Nutrition program. The Child Nutrition program ?piggyback? on two contracts used by numerous other districts to purchase food for the program. Even though these vendors have been vetted by many other school districts and the contacts did not originate with Granite Falls, we are still required to ensure that these vendors meet the suspension and debarment requirement. During the 2021-2022 school year, we transitioned to a new supervisor in that department and during the change-over, we neglected to confirm that even though these were contracts from other agencies, we still had to verify suspension and debarment. We have a good system in place currently where all contacts sign an attestation confirming they meet the suspension and debarment requirements. Child Nutrition now understands that they need to use this attestation on all contracts even if they do not originate from Granite Falls. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District has taken to resolve this issue and will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the National School Lunch Program and the Summer Food Service Program for Children. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $1,070,704 to administer these programs during the 2021-2022 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition Procurement Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state laws and local policies. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive requirements applicable to the purchase. For goods and supplies costing more than $75,000, state purchase requirements would require the District to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. Additionally, state and federal requirements, as well as the District?s policy, allow it to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement or cooperative. When piggybacking, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from another entity?s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the District when selecting the contractor. Our audit found the District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the District piggybacked onto another government?s contract to purchase food items, but it did not retain supporting documentation showing it verified the awarding government followed applicable procurement requirements before purchasing. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the District contracts for goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that contractors have not been suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded, from participating in federal programs. This verification may be accomplished by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, inserting a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The District must perform this verification before entering into the contract, and it must maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance. Our audit found the District did not have adequate controls in place to verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The District had turnover in program staff at the beginning of the 2021-2022 school year. Employees did not know they needed to obtain procurement documentation from the awarding agency to verify the process complied with procurement requirements before purchasing. Although the District has an established affidavit process that staff are supposed to use for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred, new employees were not aware of the process or the requirement to verify a contractor?s status. Effect of Condition The District piggybacked onto another agency?s contract, and it spent $212,609 of federal funds to purchase food items from one food service contractor. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with piggybacking requirements, and cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition. The District also did not obtain written certifications, insert clauses into the contracts, or check SAM.gov to verify two contractors paid $268,920 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting or purchasing. Without adequate internal controls, the District cannot ensure the contractors were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. This should include retaining documentation supporting its compliance with program requirements. We also recommend the District provide training to staff responsible for program requirements. District?s Response During the 2021-2022 school year, Granite Falls School District failed to demonstrate that suspension and debarment requirements were met in the child Nutrition program. The Child Nutrition program ?piggyback? on two contracts used by numerous other districts to purchase food for the program. Even though these vendors have been vetted by many other school districts and the contacts did not originate with Granite Falls, we are still required to ensure that these vendors meet the suspension and debarment requirement. During the 2021-2022 school year, we transitioned to a new supervisor in that department and during the change-over, we neglected to confirm that even though these were contracts from other agencies, we still had to verify suspension and debarment. We have a good system in place currently where all contacts sign an attestation confirming they meet the suspension and debarment requirements. Child Nutrition now understands that they need to use this attestation on all contracts even if they do not originate from Granite Falls. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District has taken to resolve this issue and will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Background The District participates in the Child Nutrition Cluster, which includes the National School Lunch Program and the Summer Food Service Program for Children. These programs provide free or reduced-price meals to students from low-income families. The District received $1,070,704 to administer these programs during the 2021-2022 school year. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Description of Condition Procurement Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR ? 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state laws and local policies. When using federal funds to procure goods and services, governments must apply the more restrictive requirements applicable to the purchase. For goods and supplies costing more than $75,000, state purchase requirements would require the District to award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder. Additionally, state and federal requirements, as well as the District?s policy, allow it to bypass normal procurement laws through a process commonly referred to as ?piggybacking.? This process allows entities to purchase goods and services using contracts awarded by another government or group of governments via an interlocal agreement or cooperative. When piggybacking, the entity must enter into an agreement before it purchases services or goods from another entity?s contract. If the District uses such an agreement, federal regulations require it to confirm the awarding entity followed all procurement laws and regulations applicable to the District when selecting the contractor. Our audit found the District did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the District piggybacked onto another government?s contract to purchase food items, but it did not retain supporting documentation showing it verified the awarding government followed applicable procurement requirements before purchasing. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Suspension and Debarment Federal requirements prohibit grant recipients from contracting with parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the District contracts for goods and services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify that contractors have not been suspended or debarred, or otherwise excluded, from participating in federal programs. This verification may be accomplished by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, inserting a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration?s System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The District must perform this verification before entering into the contract, and it must maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance. Our audit found the District did not have adequate controls in place to verify two contractors were not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. This issue was not reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition The District had turnover in program staff at the beginning of the 2021-2022 school year. Employees did not know they needed to obtain procurement documentation from the awarding agency to verify the process complied with procurement requirements before purchasing. Although the District has an established affidavit process that staff are supposed to use for verifying contractors are not suspended or debarred, new employees were not aware of the process or the requirement to verify a contractor?s status. Effect of Condition The District piggybacked onto another agency?s contract, and it spent $212,609 of federal funds to purchase food items from one food service contractor. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot demonstrate it complied with piggybacking requirements, and cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition. The District also did not obtain written certifications, insert clauses into the contracts, or check SAM.gov to verify two contractors paid $268,920 in federal funds were not suspended or debarred before contracting or purchasing. Without adequate internal controls, the District cannot ensure the contractors were eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the District used to pay contractors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Because we subsequently verified the contractors were not suspended or debarred, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend that the District strengthen its internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. This should include retaining documentation supporting its compliance with program requirements. We also recommend the District provide training to staff responsible for program requirements. District?s Response During the 2021-2022 school year, Granite Falls School District failed to demonstrate that suspension and debarment requirements were met in the child Nutrition program. The Child Nutrition program ?piggyback? on two contracts used by numerous other districts to purchase food for the program. Even though these vendors have been vetted by many other school districts and the contacts did not originate with Granite Falls, we are still required to ensure that these vendors meet the suspension and debarment requirement. During the 2021-2022 school year, we transitioned to a new supervisor in that department and during the change-over, we neglected to confirm that even though these were contracts from other agencies, we still had to verify suspension and debarment. We have a good system in place currently where all contacts sign an attestation confirming they meet the suspension and debarment requirements. Child Nutrition now understands that they need to use this attestation on all contracts even if they do not originate from Granite Falls. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District has taken to resolve this issue and will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures and maintaining records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 319 ? Competition, establishes all procurement transactions are to be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 320 ? Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with Federal funds by nonfederal entities. Title 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
Condition: The District has not adopted written policies or procedures regarding procurements or the determination of allowable costs in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), 2 CFR 200.318(a), and 2 CFR 200.319(d). Cause of Condition: Unfamiliarity with requirements stated in 2 CFR 200 of the Uniform Guidance.Effect of Condition: Effect is a state of noncompliance which may impact future grant awards or failure to identify and reject un-allowed costs charged to grant programs. Questioned Costs: none. Recommendation: Draft and adopt policies and procedures to become compliant with Uniform Guidance. Corrective Action Plan: Agency policies and procedures, including a guidance template will be clearly defined to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. All department managers and administrative staff will attend training and routine follow-up training on purchasing policies and procedures. A sign in sheet will be required for those attending. Contact Person: Grant Accounting Specialist Anticipated Completion Date: 01/31/2026
Federal programs: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) CFDA Number: 84.425E / 84.425F Federal award identification number: P425E205418 / P425F204999 Grant period: September 29, 2020 to June 30, 2023 and July 23, 2020 to May 23, 2022 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: N/A Category: Internal Control Finding Type: Material Weakness Compliance requirement: Other ? Policies and procedures requirements Condition and context When obtaining an understanding of the internal controls, policies, and procedures regarding the administration of federal programs, and grant term and conditions, we noted the following deficiencies: a. There is no written policy, nor the procedures designed and implemented by the Institution related to Cash Management were documented. The Institution opted to request the funds on a reimbursement basis. b. There were no written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. c. After examination of the Institution procurement policy, we noted that the document was not signed by all members required from management and was not dated. Upon inquiry, we noted that the procurement policy was drafted and submitted to the Institution for review in February 2023. Therefore, no written policy and formal procedures were designed and implemented for the procurement transactions tested for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2022 and thereafter. Criteria 2 CFR 200.302 (b) (6) and (7) establish that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 200.305, and written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must: (a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO); (b) comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards; (c) evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards; (d) take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings; and (e) take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. 2 CFR 200.318 (a) establishes that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.400 (a) to (d) establish that the application of these cost principles is based on the fundamental premises that: (a) the non-Federal entity is responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the Federal award through the application of sound management practices; (b) the non-Federal entity assumes responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (c) the non-Federal entity, in recognition of its own unique combination of staff, facilities, and experience, has the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary in order to assure proper and efficient administration of the Federal award; (d) the application of these cost principles should require no significant changes in the internal accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity. However, the accounting practices of the non-Federal entity must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by the principles and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the Federal award. Cause The Institution?s federal programs received prior the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 did not require the implementation of written procedures as mentioned in the condition and context section, except for Cash Management policies and procedures for the Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster for which the Institution has designed and implemented written procedures for such compliance requirement. The Covid-19 pandemic related programs were the reason why this new federal program funds were received, and the entity failed to design and implement on a timely basis the required written documentation and procedures. Effect Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirement could lead to administrative sanctions by the grantor, including disallowance of costs. It could also be interpreted as a failure to achieve the program?s objectives. Questioned costs None. Identification as a Repeat Finding No repeated finding. Recommendation We recommend the Institution to implement written policies and procedures needed for the administration of federal grants before the acceptance of new grants. Having well sounded policies and procedures will reduce the Institution risk of non-compliance with federal regulations and grants terms and conditions. Also, they will provide guidance to the Institution?s personnel on how to carry-out their responsibilities and functions in relation to the administration of federal programs transactions. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to the Institutional comments included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Federal programs: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) CFDA Number: 84.425E / 84.425F Federal award identification number: P425E205418 / P425F204999 Grant period: September 29, 2020 to June 30, 2023 and July 23, 2020 to May 23, 2022 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: N/A Category: Internal Control Finding Type: Material Weakness Compliance requirement: Other ? Policies and procedures requirements Condition and context When obtaining an understanding of the internal controls, policies, and procedures regarding the administration of federal programs, and grant term and conditions, we noted the following deficiencies: a. There is no written policy, nor the procedures designed and implemented by the Institution related to Cash Management were documented. The Institution opted to request the funds on a reimbursement basis. b. There were no written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. c. After examination of the Institution procurement policy, we noted that the document was not signed by all members required from management and was not dated. Upon inquiry, we noted that the procurement policy was drafted and submitted to the Institution for review in February 2023. Therefore, no written policy and formal procedures were designed and implemented for the procurement transactions tested for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2022 and thereafter. Criteria 2 CFR 200.302 (b) (6) and (7) establish that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 200.305, and written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must: (a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO); (b) comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards; (c) evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards; (d) take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings; and (e) take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. 2 CFR 200.318 (a) establishes that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.400 (a) to (d) establish that the application of these cost principles is based on the fundamental premises that: (a) the non-Federal entity is responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the Federal award through the application of sound management practices; (b) the non-Federal entity assumes responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (c) the non-Federal entity, in recognition of its own unique combination of staff, facilities, and experience, has the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary in order to assure proper and efficient administration of the Federal award; (d) the application of these cost principles should require no significant changes in the internal accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity. However, the accounting practices of the non-Federal entity must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by the principles and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the Federal award. Cause The Institution?s federal programs received prior the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 did not require the implementation of written procedures as mentioned in the condition and context section, except for Cash Management policies and procedures for the Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster for which the Institution has designed and implemented written procedures for such compliance requirement. The Covid-19 pandemic related programs were the reason why this new federal program funds were received, and the entity failed to design and implement on a timely basis the required written documentation and procedures. Effect Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirement could lead to administrative sanctions by the grantor, including disallowance of costs. It could also be interpreted as a failure to achieve the program?s objectives. Questioned costs None. Identification as a Repeat Finding No repeated finding. Recommendation We recommend the Institution to implement written policies and procedures needed for the administration of federal grants before the acceptance of new grants. Having well sounded policies and procedures will reduce the Institution risk of non-compliance with federal regulations and grants terms and conditions. Also, they will provide guidance to the Institution?s personnel on how to carry-out their responsibilities and functions in relation to the administration of federal programs transactions. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to the Institutional comments included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance listing program: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Award identification number: P425F204999 Award period: September 29, 2020 to June 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: N/A Category: Internal Control / Compliance Finding Type: Material Weakness Compliance requirement: Procurement, and suspension and debarment Condition and context In testing compliance and internal controls over the procurement, and suspension and debarment requirement, we tested the procurement documentation related to the expenditures selected for the allowable cost / cost principles test (see Finding No. 2022-006). Of the ten (10) transactions selected, nine (9) transactions required compliance with this requirement. We noted that those nine (9) transactions, which amounted to $164,592, were related to seven (7) procurement transactions. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. During our test, we noted the following deficiencies: a) In one of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (14%), no quotes were available for examination. The Institution indicated that they followed the micro purchase threshold of $10,000 as defined in 48CFR Part 2, subpart 2.1. However, this determination was not properly documented. b) In one of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (14%), only two quotes were available for examination. As per inquiry to the Institution?s management no other quotes were requested. c) In five of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (72%), only one quote was available for examination. As per inquiry to the Institution?s management no other quotes were requested. Condition and context d) For five (5) of the seven (7) procurement transactions tested (71%), a suspension and debarred verification requirement was applicable. For 100% of those five (5) transactions no evidence was provided that the Institution verified the contractors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). However, on March 20, 2023 we performed an inquiry in the Sam system and no records of exclusion were found for those contractors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 (a) to (d) establish that the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. 2 CFR 200.318 (i) establishes that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.319 (a) establishes that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and ? 200.320. 2 CFR 200.319 (d) establishes that the non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product, or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a ?brand name or equivalent? description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.319 (f) establishes that noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with ? 200.320(c). 2 CFR 200.320 establishes that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.320 (a) (1) (ii) and (a) (2) (i) establish that micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. 2 CFR 200.320 (c) establishes that there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) the item is available only from a single source; (3) the public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) after solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. 2 CFR 200.334 establishes that financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. 2 CFR 200.318 (h) establishes that the non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. 2 CFR 200.214 establishes that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Cause Lack of written policies and procedures did not provide the Institution?s personnel responsible for the procurement process a guidance on how to perform and document the procurement transactions under this federal program. Also, the failure to implement adequate internal control procedures, such as thorough management review, which should detect and correct, on a timely basis, instances where controls are not being followed. Effect Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirements could lead to administrative actions by the grantor. It could also be interpreted as a failure to manage federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts and grant agreements. Also, above conditions could result in the reimbursement of federal funds to the grantors for those transactions not properly supported and/or in compliance with regulations. Questioned costs $158,693 Identification as a Repeat Finding No repeated finding. Recommendations The Institution should verify that its policies and procedures are in accordance with federal regulations requirements. In addition, the Institution should develop written procedures before entering into new federal programs or before incurring transactions subject to compliance with federal regulations to prevent and reduce the risk of non-compliance. Also, all procurement transactions must be properly documented to provide the appropriate audit trail of the transactions and allow proper review of the transactions. Adequate documentation should be sufficient to explain the Institution?s analysis and determination. The Institution?s personnel responsible for the management and processing of procurement transactions subject to federal regulations must be provided adequate training and supervision. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to the Institutional comments included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Federal programs: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) CFDA Number: 84.425E / 84.425F Federal award identification number: P425E205418 / P425F204999 Grant period: September 29, 2020 to June 30, 2023 and July 23, 2020 to May 23, 2022 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: N/A Category: Internal Control Finding Type: Material Weakness Compliance requirement: Other ? Policies and procedures requirements Condition and context When obtaining an understanding of the internal controls, policies, and procedures regarding the administration of federal programs, and grant term and conditions, we noted the following deficiencies: a. There is no written policy, nor the procedures designed and implemented by the Institution related to Cash Management were documented. The Institution opted to request the funds on a reimbursement basis. b. There were no written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. c. After examination of the Institution procurement policy, we noted that the document was not signed by all members required from management and was not dated. Upon inquiry, we noted that the procurement policy was drafted and submitted to the Institution for review in February 2023. Therefore, no written policy and formal procedures were designed and implemented for the procurement transactions tested for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2022 and thereafter. Criteria 2 CFR 200.302 (b) (6) and (7) establish that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 200.305, and written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must: (a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO); (b) comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards; (c) evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards; (d) take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings; and (e) take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. 2 CFR 200.318 (a) establishes that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.400 (a) to (d) establish that the application of these cost principles is based on the fundamental premises that: (a) the non-Federal entity is responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the Federal award through the application of sound management practices; (b) the non-Federal entity assumes responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (c) the non-Federal entity, in recognition of its own unique combination of staff, facilities, and experience, has the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary in order to assure proper and efficient administration of the Federal award; (d) the application of these cost principles should require no significant changes in the internal accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity. However, the accounting practices of the non-Federal entity must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by the principles and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the Federal award. Cause The Institution?s federal programs received prior the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 did not require the implementation of written procedures as mentioned in the condition and context section, except for Cash Management policies and procedures for the Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster for which the Institution has designed and implemented written procedures for such compliance requirement. The Covid-19 pandemic related programs were the reason why this new federal program funds were received, and the entity failed to design and implement on a timely basis the required written documentation and procedures. Effect Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirement could lead to administrative sanctions by the grantor, including disallowance of costs. It could also be interpreted as a failure to achieve the program?s objectives. Questioned costs None. Identification as a Repeat Finding No repeated finding. Recommendation We recommend the Institution to implement written policies and procedures needed for the administration of federal grants before the acceptance of new grants. Having well sounded policies and procedures will reduce the Institution risk of non-compliance with federal regulations and grants terms and conditions. Also, they will provide guidance to the Institution?s personnel on how to carry-out their responsibilities and functions in relation to the administration of federal programs transactions. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to the Institutional comments included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Federal programs: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) CFDA Number: 84.425E / 84.425F Federal award identification number: P425E205418 / P425F204999 Grant period: September 29, 2020 to June 30, 2023 and July 23, 2020 to May 23, 2022 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: N/A Category: Internal Control Finding Type: Material Weakness Compliance requirement: Other ? Policies and procedures requirements Condition and context When obtaining an understanding of the internal controls, policies, and procedures regarding the administration of federal programs, and grant term and conditions, we noted the following deficiencies: a. There is no written policy, nor the procedures designed and implemented by the Institution related to Cash Management were documented. The Institution opted to request the funds on a reimbursement basis. b. There were no written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. c. After examination of the Institution procurement policy, we noted that the document was not signed by all members required from management and was not dated. Upon inquiry, we noted that the procurement policy was drafted and submitted to the Institution for review in February 2023. Therefore, no written policy and formal procedures were designed and implemented for the procurement transactions tested for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2022 and thereafter. Criteria 2 CFR 200.302 (b) (6) and (7) establish that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: written procedures to implement the requirements of ? 200.305, and written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 establish that the non-Federal entity must: (a) establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO); (b) comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards; (c) evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards; (d) take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings; and (e) take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable Federal, State, local, and tribal laws regarding privacy and responsibility over confidentiality. 2 CFR 200.318 (a) establishes that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200.400 (a) to (d) establish that the application of these cost principles is based on the fundamental premises that: (a) the non-Federal entity is responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the Federal award through the application of sound management practices; (b) the non-Federal entity assumes responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award; (c) the non-Federal entity, in recognition of its own unique combination of staff, facilities, and experience, has the primary responsibility for employing whatever form of sound organization and management techniques may be necessary in order to assure proper and efficient administration of the Federal award; (d) the application of these cost principles should require no significant changes in the internal accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity. However, the accounting practices of the non-Federal entity must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by the principles and must provide for adequate documentation to support costs charged to the Federal award. Cause The Institution?s federal programs received prior the fiscal year ended July 31, 2020 did not require the implementation of written procedures as mentioned in the condition and context section, except for Cash Management policies and procedures for the Student Financial Assistance Programs Cluster for which the Institution has designed and implemented written procedures for such compliance requirement. The Covid-19 pandemic related programs were the reason why this new federal program funds were received, and the entity failed to design and implement on a timely basis the required written documentation and procedures. Effect Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirement could lead to administrative sanctions by the grantor, including disallowance of costs. It could also be interpreted as a failure to achieve the program?s objectives. Questioned costs None. Identification as a Repeat Finding No repeated finding. Recommendation We recommend the Institution to implement written policies and procedures needed for the administration of federal grants before the acceptance of new grants. Having well sounded policies and procedures will reduce the Institution risk of non-compliance with federal regulations and grants terms and conditions. Also, they will provide guidance to the Institution?s personnel on how to carry-out their responsibilities and functions in relation to the administration of federal programs transactions. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to the Institutional comments included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance listing program: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Award identification number: P425F204999 Award period: September 29, 2020 to June 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: N/A Category: Internal Control / Compliance Finding Type: Material Weakness Compliance requirement: Procurement, and suspension and debarment Condition and context In testing compliance and internal controls over the procurement, and suspension and debarment requirement, we tested the procurement documentation related to the expenditures selected for the allowable cost / cost principles test (see Finding No. 2022-006). Of the ten (10) transactions selected, nine (9) transactions required compliance with this requirement. We noted that those nine (9) transactions, which amounted to $164,592, were related to seven (7) procurement transactions. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. During our test, we noted the following deficiencies: a) In one of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (14%), no quotes were available for examination. The Institution indicated that they followed the micro purchase threshold of $10,000 as defined in 48CFR Part 2, subpart 2.1. However, this determination was not properly documented. b) In one of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (14%), only two quotes were available for examination. As per inquiry to the Institution?s management no other quotes were requested. c) In five of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (72%), only one quote was available for examination. As per inquiry to the Institution?s management no other quotes were requested. Condition and context d) For five (5) of the seven (7) procurement transactions tested (71%), a suspension and debarred verification requirement was applicable. For 100% of those five (5) transactions no evidence was provided that the Institution verified the contractors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). However, on March 20, 2023 we performed an inquiry in the Sam system and no records of exclusion were found for those contractors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 (a) to (d) establish that the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. 2 CFR 200.318 (i) establishes that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.319 (a) establishes that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and ? 200.320. 2 CFR 200.319 (d) establishes that the non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product, or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a ?brand name or equivalent? description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.319 (f) establishes that noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with ? 200.320(c). 2 CFR 200.320 establishes that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.320 (a) (1) (ii) and (a) (2) (i) establish that micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. 2 CFR 200.320 (c) establishes that there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) the item is available only from a single source; (3) the public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) after solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. 2 CFR 200.334 establishes that financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. 2 CFR 200.318 (h) establishes that the non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. 2 CFR 200.214 establishes that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Cause Lack of written policies and procedures did not provide the Institution?s personnel responsible for the procurement process a guidance on how to perform and document the procurement transactions under this federal program. Also, the failure to implement adequate internal control procedures, such as thorough management review, which should detect and correct, on a timely basis, instances where controls are not being followed. Effect Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirements could lead to administrative actions by the grantor. It could also be interpreted as a failure to manage federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts and grant agreements. Also, above conditions could result in the reimbursement of federal funds to the grantors for those transactions not properly supported and/or in compliance with regulations. Questioned costs $158,693 Identification as a Repeat Finding No repeated finding. Recommendations The Institution should verify that its policies and procedures are in accordance with federal regulations requirements. In addition, the Institution should develop written procedures before entering into new federal programs or before incurring transactions subject to compliance with federal regulations to prevent and reduce the risk of non-compliance. Also, all procurement transactions must be properly documented to provide the appropriate audit trail of the transactions and allow proper review of the transactions. Adequate documentation should be sufficient to explain the Institution?s analysis and determination. The Institution?s personnel responsible for the management and processing of procurement transactions subject to federal regulations must be provided adequate training and supervision. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to the Institutional comments included in the Corrective Action Plan.
FA 2022-002 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 225GA324N1199 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $474.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,764,279.02 were expended and reported on the Monroe County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-Federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable procurement compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: The appropriate procurement method was not used for the dollar amount and conditions associated with one procurement transaction. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. In addition, a sample of 40 covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment compliance requirements were met. The following exception was noted: For two expenditures, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $13,307.47 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $474.00 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,363,942.86 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $48,623.00. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and Georgia Department of Education guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors and the return of grant funds associated with these unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed. Furthermore, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-002 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 225GA324N1199 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $474.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,764,279.02 were expended and reported on the Monroe County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-Federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable procurement compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: The appropriate procurement method was not used for the dollar amount and conditions associated with one procurement transaction. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. In addition, a sample of 40 covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment compliance requirements were met. The following exception was noted: For two expenditures, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $13,307.47 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $474.00 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,363,942.86 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $48,623.00. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and Georgia Department of Education guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors and the return of grant funds associated with these unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed. Furthermore, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-002 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 225GA324N1199 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $474.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,764,279.02 were expended and reported on the Monroe County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-Federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable procurement compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: The appropriate procurement method was not used for the dollar amount and conditions associated with one procurement transaction. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. In addition, a sample of 40 covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment compliance requirements were met. The following exception was noted: For two expenditures, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $13,307.47 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $474.00 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,363,942.86 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $48,623.00. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and Georgia Department of Education guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors and the return of grant funds associated with these unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed. Furthermore, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.