Assistance listing program: Education Stabilization Fund - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425F Award identification number: P425F204999 Award period: September 29, 2020 to June 30, 2023 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: N/A Category: Internal Control / Compliance Finding Type: Material Weakness Compliance requirement: Procurement, and suspension and debarment Condition and context In testing compliance and internal controls over the procurement, and suspension and debarment requirement, we tested the procurement documentation related to the expenditures selected for the allowable cost / cost principles test (see Finding No. 2022-006). Of the ten (10) transactions selected, nine (9) transactions required compliance with this requirement. We noted that those nine (9) transactions, which amounted to $164,592, were related to seven (7) procurement transactions. Our sample was not a statistically valid sample. During our test, we noted the following deficiencies: a) In one of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (14%), no quotes were available for examination. The Institution indicated that they followed the micro purchase threshold of $10,000 as defined in 48CFR Part 2, subpart 2.1. However, this determination was not properly documented. b) In one of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (14%), only two quotes were available for examination. As per inquiry to the Institution?s management no other quotes were requested. c) In five of seven (7) procurement transactions tested (72%), only one quote was available for examination. As per inquiry to the Institution?s management no other quotes were requested. Condition and context d) For five (5) of the seven (7) procurement transactions tested (71%), a suspension and debarred verification requirement was applicable. For 100% of those five (5) transactions no evidence was provided that the Institution verified the contractors were not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded (2 CFR sections 200.212 and 200.318(h); 2 CFR section 180.300; 48 CFR section 52.209-6). However, on March 20, 2023 we performed an inquiry in the Sam system and no records of exclusion were found for those contractors. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 (a) to (d) establish that the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with the U.S. Constitution, Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. 2 CFR 200.318 (i) establishes that the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. 2 CFR 200.319 (a) establishes that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section and ? 200.320. 2 CFR 200.319 (d) establishes that the non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product, or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a ?brand name or equivalent? description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. 2 CFR 200.319 (f) establishes that noncompetitive procurements can only be awarded in accordance with ? 200.320(c). 2 CFR 200.320 establishes that the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and ?? 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. 2 CFR 200.320 (a) (1) (ii) and (a) (2) (i) establish that micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price or rate quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable based on research, experience, purchase history or other information and documents it files accordingly. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. 2 CFR 200.320 (c) establishes that there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) the item is available only from a single source; (3) the public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) after solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. 2 CFR 200.334 establishes that financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. 2 CFR 200.318 (h) establishes that the non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. 2 CFR 200.214 establishes that non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Cause Lack of written policies and procedures did not provide the Institution?s personnel responsible for the procurement process a guidance on how to perform and document the procurement transactions under this federal program. Also, the failure to implement adequate internal control procedures, such as thorough management review, which should detect and correct, on a timely basis, instances where controls are not being followed. Effect Noncompliance with the above-mentioned requirements could lead to administrative actions by the grantor. It could also be interpreted as a failure to manage federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts and grant agreements. Also, above conditions could result in the reimbursement of federal funds to the grantors for those transactions not properly supported and/or in compliance with regulations. Questioned costs $158,693 Identification as a Repeat Finding No repeated finding. Recommendations The Institution should verify that its policies and procedures are in accordance with federal regulations requirements. In addition, the Institution should develop written procedures before entering into new federal programs or before incurring transactions subject to compliance with federal regulations to prevent and reduce the risk of non-compliance. Also, all procurement transactions must be properly documented to provide the appropriate audit trail of the transactions and allow proper review of the transactions. Adequate documentation should be sufficient to explain the Institution?s analysis and determination. The Institution?s personnel responsible for the management and processing of procurement transactions subject to federal regulations must be provided adequate training and supervision. Views of Responsible Officials Refer to the Institutional comments included in the Corrective Action Plan.
FA 2022-002 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 225GA324N1199 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $474.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,764,279.02 were expended and reported on the Monroe County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-Federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable procurement compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: The appropriate procurement method was not used for the dollar amount and conditions associated with one procurement transaction. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. In addition, a sample of 40 covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment compliance requirements were met. The following exception was noted: For two expenditures, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $13,307.47 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $474.00 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,363,942.86 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $48,623.00. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and Georgia Department of Education guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors and the return of grant funds associated with these unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed. Furthermore, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-002 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 225GA324N1199 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $474.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,764,279.02 were expended and reported on the Monroe County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-Federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable procurement compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: The appropriate procurement method was not used for the dollar amount and conditions associated with one procurement transaction. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. In addition, a sample of 40 covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment compliance requirements were met. The following exception was noted: For two expenditures, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $13,307.47 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $474.00 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,363,942.86 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $48,623.00. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and Georgia Department of Education guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors and the return of grant funds associated with these unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed. Furthermore, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
FA 2022-002 Improve Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Internal Control Impact: Significant Deficiency Compliance Impact: Nonmaterial Noncompliance Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: Georgia Department of Education AL Numbers and Titles: 10.553 – School Breakfast Program 10.555 – National School Lunch Program Federal Award Number: 225GA324N1199 (Year: 2022) Questioned Costs: $474.00 Description: A review of expenditures charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster revealed that the School District’s internal control procedures were not operating appropriately to ensure that the School District’s procurement procedures were followed. Background: The Child Nutrition Cluster (CNC) is comprised of various programs that are intended to assist states in administering and overseeing food service program operators that provide healthful, nutritious meals to eligible children in public and non-profit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and summer programs. This Cluster of programs also fosters healthy eating habits in children by providing fresh fruits and fresh vegetables to children attending elementary and secondary schools and encourages the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. CNC funding was granted to the Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. GaDOE is responsible for distributing funds to local educational agencies (LEAs) and overseeing the various CNC programs. CNC funds totaling $2,764,279.02 were expended and reported on the Monroe County Board of Education’s Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for fiscal year 2022. Criteria: As a recipient of federal awards, the School District is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards pursuant to Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), Section 200.303 – Internal Controls. Additionally, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.318 – General Procurement Standards state in part that “(a) the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and… (b) non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders.” In addition, provisions included in the Uniform Guidance, Section 200.320 – Methods of Procurement to Be Followed provide guidance for procurement through small purchase procedures and state “If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources.” Furthermore, Title 2 CFR Section 180.300 states in part that the non-Federal entity must “verify that the entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You can do this by: (a) Checking System for Awards Management (SAM) exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from the entity; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity.” Condition: A sample of 40 procurement transactions was randomly selected for testing using a non-statistical sampling approach. These expenditures were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented, and applicable procurement compliance requirements were met. The following deficiencies were noted: The appropriate procurement method was not used for the dollar amount and conditions associated with one procurement transaction. The School District could not provide evidence that an adequate number of rate or price quotations was obtained from qualified sources for one small purchase expenditure reviewed. In addition, a sample of 40 covered transactions was randomly selected for testing using a nonstatistical sampling approach. These transactions were reviewed to determine if appropriate internal controls were implemented and if suspension and debarment compliance requirements were met. The following exception was noted: For two expenditures, documentation could not be provided to support the entity’s verification that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: Upon testing a sample of $13,307.47 in procurement transactions, known questioned costs of $474.00 were identified for expenditures that did not follow the School District’s procurement procedures. Using the total population of $1,363,942.86 in procurement transactions, we project the likely questioned costs to be approximately $48,623.00. Cause: The School District did not follow its policies and procedures that govern the procurement process for federal programs. Effect: The School District is not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance and Georgia Department of Education guidance. Failure to appropriately implement procedures to address procurement compliance requirements could result in the expenditure of federal funds with unqualified vendors and the return of grant funds associated with these unallowable expenditures. Recommendation: The School District should evaluate and improve internal control procedures to ensure that required procurement methods are properly identified and followed. Furthermore, management should develop a monitoring process to ensure that these procedures are operating appropriately. Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Program All Federal Programs Criteria The City must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition The City’s procurement standards do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs None noted. Context Although the City did not have a policy in place in conformity with the federal uniform guidance criteria, the City did follow their procedures as it relates to the contracts under the procurements applicable to the City’s major programs. Effect The City is at risk for noncompliance for expenditures of federal monies as it relates to federal procurement. Cause The purchasing department staffing levels did not allow for review and update of the City’s purchasing policy. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its formal procurement policies and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions Management agrees with this finding. The City will update the purchasing policy to include the CFR requirements.
Department of Labor, YouthBuild Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number # 17.274, 2020-2023 Department of Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Relief Recover Funds Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 21.027, Awards passed through the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the City of Minneapolis Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that there was no observable control documentation to directly indicate that a search for price comparisons or suspension and debarment was performed on vendors. Cause: Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect: A lack of established controls increases the overall risk that Organization is contracting and awarding contracts to suspended or debarred vendors or is not obtaining the best possible prices for goods or services. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 17.274, a nonstatistical sample of 44 transactions out of 220 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to the price comparison search was not maintained for 14 of the items selected. Required documentation related to the search for suspension and debarment was not maintained for any of the items selected. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 21.027 a nonstatistical sample of seven transactions out of 21 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to the search for suspension and debarment was not maintained for two of the items selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement, suspension, and debarment and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with this finding.
Department of Labor, YouthBuild Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number # 17.274, 2020-2023 Department of Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Relief Recover Funds Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 21.027, Awards passed through the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the City of Minneapolis Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that there was no observable control documentation to directly indicate that a search for price comparisons or suspension and debarment was performed on vendors. Cause: Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect: A lack of established controls increases the overall risk that Organization is contracting and awarding contracts to suspended or debarred vendors or is not obtaining the best possible prices for goods or services. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 17.274, a nonstatistical sample of 44 transactions out of 220 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to the price comparison search was not maintained for 14 of the items selected. Required documentation related to the search for suspension and debarment was not maintained for any of the items selected. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 21.027 a nonstatistical sample of seven transactions out of 21 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to the search for suspension and debarment was not maintained for two of the items selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement, suspension, and debarment and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with this finding.
Department of Labor, YouthBuild Federal Financial Assistance Listing Number # 17.274, 2020-2023 Department of Treasury, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Relief Recover Funds Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 21.027, Awards passed through the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the City of Minneapolis Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. Condition: In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment, it was identified that there was no observable control documentation to directly indicate that a search for price comparisons or suspension and debarment was performed on vendors. Cause: Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect: A lack of established controls increases the overall risk that Organization is contracting and awarding contracts to suspended or debarred vendors or is not obtaining the best possible prices for goods or services. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: For Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 17.274, a nonstatistical sample of 44 transactions out of 220 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to the price comparison search was not maintained for 14 of the items selected. Required documentation related to the search for suspension and debarment was not maintained for any of the items selected. For Federal Financial Assistance Listing # 21.027 a nonstatistical sample of seven transactions out of 21 total transactions were selected for testing. Required documentation related to the search for suspension and debarment was not maintained for two of the items selected. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement, suspension, and debarment and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement with this finding.
Identification of federal program: US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, passed through the Indiana Department of Education, Charter Schools Program 84.282A Criteria : In accordance with CFR 200.318(i), the non-federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In addition, in accordance with CFR 200.318(a) the non- federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures consistent with federal procurement standards. Condition: Expenditures tested that met the small purchase threshold (purchases with a cost between $10,000 and $250,000) did not have documentation detailing the history of procurement. Cause : The School does not have procurement policies that follow federal guidelines, specifically 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed. Effect : Property and equipment additions made using federal funds during the year did not have appropriate a support showing procurement policies were followed. Questioned costs: $83,864 Context: Two out of two purchases tested for procurement did not follow federal procurement methods. Recommendation : We recommend that the School institute procurement policies whereby acquisitions follow appropriate procurement steps as required by 2 CRF 200.350 and documentation of procurement decisions is maintained. View of responsible officials : See attached corrective action plan
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET), Federal Financial Assistance Listing #93.318, 87728, Protecting and Improving Health Globally: Building and Strengthening Public Health Impact, Systems, Capacity and Security Procurement Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required depending on the amount of the transaction. The Organization is required to create a written procurement, suspension, and debarment policy that complies with applicable federal requirements and to follow this policy when procuring goods and services. The Organization is also required to retain documentation supporting performance of a price analysis and open competition. Condition: The Organization’s procurement policy does not contain all provisions required by Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200. Additionally, there was no documentation retained supporting a price analysis over the transactions tested. Cause: The Organization has limited staffing and did not have proper controls in place relating to review of the procurement policy. Effect: The Organization did not ensure that the procurement policy was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A nonstatistical sample of 4 out of 9 procurement transactions were selected for testing, which accounted for $175,792 of $370,234 qualified expenditures.Repeat Finding from Prior Years: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization follow control processes implemented which includes updating the procurement policy and documenting the performance of required procurement procedures. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Federal Program Information: Funding Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Title: USDA School Breakfast Program and National School Lunch Program FAL Number: 10.553 and 10.555 Passthrough: New Mexico Public Education Department Award Year: 2022 Criteria: §200.213 Suspension and debarment. Non-federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. These regulations restrict awards, sub awards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. §200.317 Procurements by states. When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a state must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The state will comply with §200.322 Procurement of recovered materials and ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes any clauses required by section §200.326 Contract provisions. All other non-Federal entities, including sub recipients of a state, will follow §200.318 General procurement standards through 200.326 Contract provisions. §200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. APPENDIX II TO PART 200—CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR NON-FEDERAL ENTITY CONTRACTS UNDER FEDERAL AWARDS In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. (H) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the government-wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Condition: During our testing of single audit disbursements, we identified five vendors which would meet the requirement of verifying that the vendor was not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from receiving the contract which was funded through Federal dollars. The vendor received single payments in excess of $25,000 from the District from Federal grant sources. The vendors are not currently suspended or debarred from receiving Federal contracts; however, the District did not have proper internal controls in place to verify this prior to the purchase. Questioned Costs: None Cause: District personnel did not verify that vendors which meet the $25,000 thresholds are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in contracts funded through Federal awards due to a misunderstanding of staff personnel regarding this requirement. Effect: The District is not in compliance with Federal regulations related to the grant and could put funding in jeopardy or require the District to reimburse the program for improper grant distributions.Auditor’s Recommendation: We recommend the District establish a policy and implement procedures regarding large purchases related to Federal grants to insure that no vendors who are suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participating in transactions funded through Federal grants are used. As identified above, there are several methods in which the District can verify vendors are not suspended or debarred. The District may have the vendor provide an annual certification that it is not currently suspended, debarred, or otherwise prevented from receiving Federal dollars. In other occasions in which a single purchase is going to be made, the purchasing procedures should include looking up the vendor on the GSA website, printing a copy of the verification, and placing it in the file with the purchase order. The District has options, and it should establish what method is the least intrusive but also effective in complying with the requirements of the Uniform Grant Guidance. Responsible Official’s Plan: • Specific corrective action plan for finding: The Grants Finance Department, Purchasing Department along with the Federal Grants Department will review vendors that are issued requisitions at each approval level to assist in catching $25K or more for Suspension and Debarment. A printed document from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility to Requisitions over $25K should be attached. At initial setup of new vendors, the Purchasing Department will review vendors in SAM.GOV. A printed document from SAM.GOV verifying eligibility of vendor will be attached to the vendor file. • Timeline for completion of corrective action plan: July 1, 2023 • Employee position(s) responsible for meeting the timeline: Grants Specialists, CPO, Finance Specialist, Purchasing Specialist, Federal Grants Coordinator, Federal Grants Specialist
2022 ? 001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Justice Federal Program Name: Crime Victim Services Assistance Listing Number: 16.575 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs Pass-Through Number(s): A-CVS-2020-CADA-00030 Award Period: October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.318(a) - The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Organization's procurement policy is limited in terms of documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Questioned costs: None Context: We noted the Organization?s current policy states ?expenditures in excess of $5,000 for the purchase of a single item is required to have bids from three suppliers if possible.? However, the federal guidelines have increased those same thresholds to $10,000 for quotations and $250,000 for sealed bids. The policy is silent as to when sealed bids are required. Cause: The process of ensuring grant requirements are understood. Effect: Procurement transactions may be not be compliant with Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update the purchasing section of its current Fiscal Policies and Procedures manual. The updated procedures should at a minimum address general procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2022 ? 001: Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Justice Federal Program Name: Crime Victim Services Assistance Listing Number: 16.575 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs Pass-Through Number(s): A-CVS-2020-CADA-00030 Award Period: October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.318(a) - The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Organization's procurement policy is limited in terms of documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Questioned costs: None Context: We noted the Organization?s current policy states ?expenditures in excess of $5,000 for the purchase of a single item is required to have bids from three suppliers if possible.? However, the federal guidelines have increased those same thresholds to $10,000 for quotations and $250,000 for sealed bids. The policy is silent as to when sealed bids are required. Cause: The process of ensuring grant requirements are understood. Effect: Procurement transactions may be not be compliant with Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update the purchasing section of its current Fiscal Policies and Procedures manual. The updated procedures should at a minimum address general procurement standards. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.