2022-003 Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Name: State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.561 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 22MN101S2514 - 202 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Human Services Pass-Through Numbers: 22MN101S2514, 22MN127Q7503, 22MN101S2520 Award Period: January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations ? 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Non-federal entities other than states must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition/Context: For 1 of 2 vendors tested, no documentation was maintained to support the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, or the basis for the contract price. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Questioned costs: $111,837 was paid to the vendor during 2022. Cause: County federal procurement policies were not followed. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system enabled noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement or the compliance requirement could result in the loss of federal funds to the County. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend County management establish a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with federal procurement requirements. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
U.S Department of Treasury Finding 2022.001 CFDA# 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Compliance Requirement - Procurement Condition: NCHC did not have adequate procurement policies in effect that meet the minimum federal requirements for procurement standards. Criteria: Under Uniform Guidance, NCHC is required to implement certain written procurement policies that adhere to the minimum federal requirements as outlined at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. Context: During the audit, it was determined that NCHC's procurement policies did not meet minimum federal requirements. Cause: NCHC did not have adequate procurement policies in effect that meet the minimum federal requirements. Effect: NCHC was not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327 and as a result did not perform proper procurement procedures over all transactions. Recommendations: We recommend NCHC implement policies and procedures that adhere to the minimum procurement requirements as outlined in federal procurement standards 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327. View of Responsible NCHC will implement policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the Officials: requirements as outlined in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.327.
Finding number: 2022-001 Repeat finding: No Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 / 93.527 Assistance Listing Title: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Description: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?215.43 the Organization is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR ?215.44. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The procurement method the Organization used did not meet procurement standards as set forth in 2 CFR sections 200.320. A sole source procurement method was used when the vendor did not meet the sole source definition. Cause: The Organization was not fully aware of the federal procurement compliance requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with their own policies or with federal regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels. The Organozation should also seek out additonal training for procurment to ensure federal rules and requirements are being met. View of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this condition related to lack of adequate controls over procurement and is creating controls that will assure compliance with requirements.
Finding number: 2022-001 Repeat finding: No Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 / 93.527 Assistance Listing Title: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Description: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?215.43 the Organization is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR ?215.44. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The procurement method the Organization used did not meet procurement standards as set forth in 2 CFR sections 200.320. A sole source procurement method was used when the vendor did not meet the sole source definition. Cause: The Organization was not fully aware of the federal procurement compliance requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with their own policies or with federal regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels. The Organozation should also seek out additonal training for procurment to ensure federal rules and requirements are being met. View of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this condition related to lack of adequate controls over procurement and is creating controls that will assure compliance with requirements.
Finding number: 2022-001 Repeat finding: No Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 / 93.527 Assistance Listing Title: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Noncompliance, Significant Deficiency Description: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR ?215.43 the Organization is required to implement certain procurement policies that adhere to the minimum Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR ?215.44. Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR Sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The procurement method the Organization used did not meet procurement standards as set forth in 2 CFR sections 200.320. A sole source procurement method was used when the vendor did not meet the sole source definition. Cause: The Organization was not fully aware of the federal procurement compliance requirements. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with their own policies or with federal regulations. Recommendation: The Organization should ensure procurement policies are being followed for all procurement levels. The Organozation should also seek out additonal training for procurment to ensure federal rules and requirements are being met. View of responsible officials: Management acknowledges this condition related to lack of adequate controls over procurement and is creating controls that will assure compliance with requirements.
Kittitas Reclamation District January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 15.517 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Federal Award/Contract Number: R22AP00447-00, R21AP10328-03, R18AP00036-02, R21AP10329-01 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act program is to provide financial assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Bureau of Reclamation projects. During fiscal year 2022, the District spent $7,097,974 in federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act funds, which were awarded by the Bureau of Reclamation at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The District used program funding on four projects in Kittitas County. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own written procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards Page 6 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state law or local policies. When procuring architectural and engineering services, federal regulations require the District to advertise for each project, identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance, have a written method for conducting technical evaluations, and document the evaluation supporting its decision to go with the best engineer for each separate award. Description of Condition The District has a written policy that conforms to federal regulations that require a qualifications-based selection of architectural and engineering services. However, when it procured its engineer for the four projects, the District selected from an engineering roster, which is not in compliance with its own policy and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)). We consider this control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District followed guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when creating its architectural and engineering roster, which allowed for a base contract to be awarded to a pool of firms. District officials thought this was an acceptable method to follow and were not aware the District cannot select architects and engineers from a roster when using federal funds to pay for projects. Effect of Condition The District paid one engineer $462,617 with federal funds during the audit period. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified engineer, and complied with federal procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services to ensure compliance with federal requirements. District?s Response The Kittitas Reclamation District (District) has made a considerable effort to obtain critical climate resiliency and water conservation grant funding over the last 7 years. In that period, the District has been awarded several state and federal awards for infrastructure projects requiring engineering services. These projects were audited and found compliant. Internally, the District?s processes and procedures have been scrutinized and revised after receiving constructive input from prior auditors. It is the District's priority to continue to set a standard of excellence as the District proceeds into the future enhancing the irrigation system and works towards essential water conservation efforts while improving the ecosystem to allow the system to benefit future generations. As the funding opportunities grew, there was a collaborative effort made with the District consultants to utilize the funding opportunities as they arose. Keeping site on the fact that work had to be accomplished within the limited construction window during the winter months when the irrigation system was not running water and being used by the landowners. There was extensive work done to draft and create a Multi-Year Multiple Award Task Order (IDIQ) for Professional Services which allows the District to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries to be scheduled by placing orders with a contractor. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) allows agencies to use IDIQ contracts to benefit from an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delay of conducting a separate procurement for each project. The process included developing a scope of work, advertising in multiple newspapers for solicitation of services, establishing a list of qualified applicants, scoring the applicants and utilizing the awardees for prospective funding opportunities as they were granted. The length of the IDIQ has changed from the initial one-year term to the current 5-year term but beyond the term of the contract the process has been unchanged. This process was reviewed in prior audits and the District was not asked to make any changes to the process in past audits. When the current engineering services contracts were procured, the District understood it had met all the uniform guidance and after the appropriate advertising and with only two engineering firms responding, both responding firms were awarded an Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDICs) in accordance with our interpretation of FAR 16.5 and FAR 36.602-1. These IDCs comprise the District?s roster for engineer firms based on their qualifications relative to the criteria established for Category 1 under the Notice to Consultants, 2022 Kittitas Reclamation District (KRD) On-Call Rosters advertised and evaluated in Page 8 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov February 2022. Specifically, the District Request for Qualifications solicitation evaluated firms on four criteria, qualifications of firm (up to 20points), qualifications of proposed Project Manager(s) (up to 30 points), firm?s technical expertise (up to 50 points), and references/past performances (up to 50 points). The competitive, qualifications-based roster selection is not the same roster or process utilized for the District Vendor List for Limited Public Works and Small Works Roster. The District has since learned that it should have kept documentation as to how the Engineering Firm was chosen for each task order project awarded within the IDC scope. There was no formal documentation to provide on the selection process for each individual project. It should also be noted that, particularly with an irrigation canal, it is imperative to have continuity of engineering on the same project that continues from one winter construction window and funding cycle to the next to ensure the integrity of the canal system and the most efficient use of funds for each project. Upon receiving the guidance on the current audit, the District would like to move forward by reviewing the procurement policy and making any necessary changes while working under the guidance of the SAO Procurement Specialist to ensure that an updated procurement policy continues to meet the needs of the District and the federal guidelines for federal funding. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District?s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Page 9 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Kittitas Reclamation District January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 15.517 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Federal Award/Contract Number: R22AP00447-00, R21AP10328-03, R18AP00036-02, R21AP10329-01 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act program is to provide financial assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Bureau of Reclamation projects. During fiscal year 2022, the District spent $7,097,974 in federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act funds, which were awarded by the Bureau of Reclamation at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The District used program funding on four projects in Kittitas County. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own written procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards Page 6 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state law or local policies. When procuring architectural and engineering services, federal regulations require the District to advertise for each project, identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance, have a written method for conducting technical evaluations, and document the evaluation supporting its decision to go with the best engineer for each separate award. Description of Condition The District has a written policy that conforms to federal regulations that require a qualifications-based selection of architectural and engineering services. However, when it procured its engineer for the four projects, the District selected from an engineering roster, which is not in compliance with its own policy and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)). We consider this control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District followed guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when creating its architectural and engineering roster, which allowed for a base contract to be awarded to a pool of firms. District officials thought this was an acceptable method to follow and were not aware the District cannot select architects and engineers from a roster when using federal funds to pay for projects. Effect of Condition The District paid one engineer $462,617 with federal funds during the audit period. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified engineer, and complied with federal procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services to ensure compliance with federal requirements. District?s Response The Kittitas Reclamation District (District) has made a considerable effort to obtain critical climate resiliency and water conservation grant funding over the last 7 years. In that period, the District has been awarded several state and federal awards for infrastructure projects requiring engineering services. These projects were audited and found compliant. Internally, the District?s processes and procedures have been scrutinized and revised after receiving constructive input from prior auditors. It is the District's priority to continue to set a standard of excellence as the District proceeds into the future enhancing the irrigation system and works towards essential water conservation efforts while improving the ecosystem to allow the system to benefit future generations. As the funding opportunities grew, there was a collaborative effort made with the District consultants to utilize the funding opportunities as they arose. Keeping site on the fact that work had to be accomplished within the limited construction window during the winter months when the irrigation system was not running water and being used by the landowners. There was extensive work done to draft and create a Multi-Year Multiple Award Task Order (IDIQ) for Professional Services which allows the District to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries to be scheduled by placing orders with a contractor. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) allows agencies to use IDIQ contracts to benefit from an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delay of conducting a separate procurement for each project. The process included developing a scope of work, advertising in multiple newspapers for solicitation of services, establishing a list of qualified applicants, scoring the applicants and utilizing the awardees for prospective funding opportunities as they were granted. The length of the IDIQ has changed from the initial one-year term to the current 5-year term but beyond the term of the contract the process has been unchanged. This process was reviewed in prior audits and the District was not asked to make any changes to the process in past audits. When the current engineering services contracts were procured, the District understood it had met all the uniform guidance and after the appropriate advertising and with only two engineering firms responding, both responding firms were awarded an Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDICs) in accordance with our interpretation of FAR 16.5 and FAR 36.602-1. These IDCs comprise the District?s roster for engineer firms based on their qualifications relative to the criteria established for Category 1 under the Notice to Consultants, 2022 Kittitas Reclamation District (KRD) On-Call Rosters advertised and evaluated in Page 8 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov February 2022. Specifically, the District Request for Qualifications solicitation evaluated firms on four criteria, qualifications of firm (up to 20points), qualifications of proposed Project Manager(s) (up to 30 points), firm?s technical expertise (up to 50 points), and references/past performances (up to 50 points). The competitive, qualifications-based roster selection is not the same roster or process utilized for the District Vendor List for Limited Public Works and Small Works Roster. The District has since learned that it should have kept documentation as to how the Engineering Firm was chosen for each task order project awarded within the IDC scope. There was no formal documentation to provide on the selection process for each individual project. It should also be noted that, particularly with an irrigation canal, it is imperative to have continuity of engineering on the same project that continues from one winter construction window and funding cycle to the next to ensure the integrity of the canal system and the most efficient use of funds for each project. Upon receiving the guidance on the current audit, the District would like to move forward by reviewing the procurement policy and making any necessary changes while working under the guidance of the SAO Procurement Specialist to ensure that an updated procurement policy continues to meet the needs of the District and the federal guidelines for federal funding. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District?s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Page 9 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Kittitas Reclamation District January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 15.517 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Federal Award/Contract Number: R22AP00447-00, R21AP10328-03, R18AP00036-02, R21AP10329-01 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act program is to provide financial assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Bureau of Reclamation projects. During fiscal year 2022, the District spent $7,097,974 in federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act funds, which were awarded by the Bureau of Reclamation at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The District used program funding on four projects in Kittitas County. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own written procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards Page 6 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state law or local policies. When procuring architectural and engineering services, federal regulations require the District to advertise for each project, identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance, have a written method for conducting technical evaluations, and document the evaluation supporting its decision to go with the best engineer for each separate award. Description of Condition The District has a written policy that conforms to federal regulations that require a qualifications-based selection of architectural and engineering services. However, when it procured its engineer for the four projects, the District selected from an engineering roster, which is not in compliance with its own policy and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)). We consider this control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District followed guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when creating its architectural and engineering roster, which allowed for a base contract to be awarded to a pool of firms. District officials thought this was an acceptable method to follow and were not aware the District cannot select architects and engineers from a roster when using federal funds to pay for projects. Effect of Condition The District paid one engineer $462,617 with federal funds during the audit period. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified engineer, and complied with federal procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services to ensure compliance with federal requirements. District?s Response The Kittitas Reclamation District (District) has made a considerable effort to obtain critical climate resiliency and water conservation grant funding over the last 7 years. In that period, the District has been awarded several state and federal awards for infrastructure projects requiring engineering services. These projects were audited and found compliant. Internally, the District?s processes and procedures have been scrutinized and revised after receiving constructive input from prior auditors. It is the District's priority to continue to set a standard of excellence as the District proceeds into the future enhancing the irrigation system and works towards essential water conservation efforts while improving the ecosystem to allow the system to benefit future generations. As the funding opportunities grew, there was a collaborative effort made with the District consultants to utilize the funding opportunities as they arose. Keeping site on the fact that work had to be accomplished within the limited construction window during the winter months when the irrigation system was not running water and being used by the landowners. There was extensive work done to draft and create a Multi-Year Multiple Award Task Order (IDIQ) for Professional Services which allows the District to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries to be scheduled by placing orders with a contractor. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) allows agencies to use IDIQ contracts to benefit from an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delay of conducting a separate procurement for each project. The process included developing a scope of work, advertising in multiple newspapers for solicitation of services, establishing a list of qualified applicants, scoring the applicants and utilizing the awardees for prospective funding opportunities as they were granted. The length of the IDIQ has changed from the initial one-year term to the current 5-year term but beyond the term of the contract the process has been unchanged. This process was reviewed in prior audits and the District was not asked to make any changes to the process in past audits. When the current engineering services contracts were procured, the District understood it had met all the uniform guidance and after the appropriate advertising and with only two engineering firms responding, both responding firms were awarded an Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDICs) in accordance with our interpretation of FAR 16.5 and FAR 36.602-1. These IDCs comprise the District?s roster for engineer firms based on their qualifications relative to the criteria established for Category 1 under the Notice to Consultants, 2022 Kittitas Reclamation District (KRD) On-Call Rosters advertised and evaluated in Page 8 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov February 2022. Specifically, the District Request for Qualifications solicitation evaluated firms on four criteria, qualifications of firm (up to 20points), qualifications of proposed Project Manager(s) (up to 30 points), firm?s technical expertise (up to 50 points), and references/past performances (up to 50 points). The competitive, qualifications-based roster selection is not the same roster or process utilized for the District Vendor List for Limited Public Works and Small Works Roster. The District has since learned that it should have kept documentation as to how the Engineering Firm was chosen for each task order project awarded within the IDC scope. There was no formal documentation to provide on the selection process for each individual project. It should also be noted that, particularly with an irrigation canal, it is imperative to have continuity of engineering on the same project that continues from one winter construction window and funding cycle to the next to ensure the integrity of the canal system and the most efficient use of funds for each project. Upon receiving the guidance on the current audit, the District would like to move forward by reviewing the procurement policy and making any necessary changes while working under the guidance of the SAO Procurement Specialist to ensure that an updated procurement policy continues to meet the needs of the District and the federal guidelines for federal funding. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District?s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Page 9 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with federal funds by nonfederal entities.
Kittitas Reclamation District January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-001 The District?s internal controls were inadequate for ensuring it complied with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 15.517 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Federal Award/Contract Number: R22AP00447-00, R21AP10328-03, R18AP00036-02, R21AP10329-01 Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act program is to provide financial assistance, through grants or cooperative agreements, to public or private organizations for the improvement of fish and wildlife habitat associated with water systems or water supplies affected by Bureau of Reclamation projects. During fiscal year 2022, the District spent $7,097,974 in federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act funds, which were awarded by the Bureau of Reclamation at the U.S. Department of the Interior. The District used program funding on four projects in Kittitas County. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding grant requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require grant recipients to follow their own written procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards Page 6 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. These procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal requirements, state law or local policies. When procuring architectural and engineering services, federal regulations require the District to advertise for each project, identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance, have a written method for conducting technical evaluations, and document the evaluation supporting its decision to go with the best engineer for each separate award. Description of Condition The District has a written policy that conforms to federal regulations that require a qualifications-based selection of architectural and engineering services. However, when it procured its engineer for the four projects, the District selected from an engineering roster, which is not in compliance with its own policy and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)). We consider this control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition The District followed guidance from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when creating its architectural and engineering roster, which allowed for a base contract to be awarded to a pool of firms. District officials thought this was an acceptable method to follow and were not aware the District cannot select architects and engineers from a roster when using federal funds to pay for projects. Effect of Condition The District paid one engineer $462,617 with federal funds during the audit period. Without effective internal controls, the District cannot ensure it allowed for full and open competition, selected the most qualified engineer, and complied with federal procurement requirements. Recommendation We recommend the District strengthen internal controls over its procurement of architectural and engineering services to ensure compliance with federal requirements. District?s Response The Kittitas Reclamation District (District) has made a considerable effort to obtain critical climate resiliency and water conservation grant funding over the last 7 years. In that period, the District has been awarded several state and federal awards for infrastructure projects requiring engineering services. These projects were audited and found compliant. Internally, the District?s processes and procedures have been scrutinized and revised after receiving constructive input from prior auditors. It is the District's priority to continue to set a standard of excellence as the District proceeds into the future enhancing the irrigation system and works towards essential water conservation efforts while improving the ecosystem to allow the system to benefit future generations. As the funding opportunities grew, there was a collaborative effort made with the District consultants to utilize the funding opportunities as they arose. Keeping site on the fact that work had to be accomplished within the limited construction window during the winter months when the irrigation system was not running water and being used by the landowners. There was extensive work done to draft and create a Multi-Year Multiple Award Task Order (IDIQ) for Professional Services which allows the District to acquire an indefinite quantity, within stated limits, of supplies or services during a fixed period, with deliveries to be scheduled by placing orders with a contractor. The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) allows agencies to use IDIQ contracts to benefit from an ongoing competitive environment throughout the duration of the contract while minimizing the delay of conducting a separate procurement for each project. The process included developing a scope of work, advertising in multiple newspapers for solicitation of services, establishing a list of qualified applicants, scoring the applicants and utilizing the awardees for prospective funding opportunities as they were granted. The length of the IDIQ has changed from the initial one-year term to the current 5-year term but beyond the term of the contract the process has been unchanged. This process was reviewed in prior audits and the District was not asked to make any changes to the process in past audits. When the current engineering services contracts were procured, the District understood it had met all the uniform guidance and after the appropriate advertising and with only two engineering firms responding, both responding firms were awarded an Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDICs) in accordance with our interpretation of FAR 16.5 and FAR 36.602-1. These IDCs comprise the District?s roster for engineer firms based on their qualifications relative to the criteria established for Category 1 under the Notice to Consultants, 2022 Kittitas Reclamation District (KRD) On-Call Rosters advertised and evaluated in Page 8 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov February 2022. Specifically, the District Request for Qualifications solicitation evaluated firms on four criteria, qualifications of firm (up to 20points), qualifications of proposed Project Manager(s) (up to 30 points), firm?s technical expertise (up to 50 points), and references/past performances (up to 50 points). The competitive, qualifications-based roster selection is not the same roster or process utilized for the District Vendor List for Limited Public Works and Small Works Roster. The District has since learned that it should have kept documentation as to how the Engineering Firm was chosen for each task order project awarded within the IDC scope. There was no formal documentation to provide on the selection process for each individual project. It should also be noted that, particularly with an irrigation canal, it is imperative to have continuity of engineering on the same project that continues from one winter construction window and funding cycle to the next to ensure the integrity of the canal system and the most efficient use of funds for each project. Upon receiving the guidance on the current audit, the District would like to move forward by reviewing the procurement policy and making any necessary changes while working under the guidance of the SAO Procurement Specialist to ensure that an updated procurement policy continues to meet the needs of the District and the federal guidelines for federal funding. Auditor?s Remarks We appreciate the steps the District?s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the District for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. Page 9 Office of the Washington State Auditor sao.wa.gov The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 320, Methods of procurement to be followed, establishes requirements for procuring with federal funds by nonfederal entities.
2022-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program CFDA Number: 10.561 Award Period: December 1, 2019 through September 30, 2023 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.318(a) states, ?the non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward.? In addition, per the Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. The regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Organization had not adopted a procurement policy and no procurement procedures were performed in selecting contractors. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Procurement policies and procedures were not adopted by the Organization. Effect: The Organization may not have received a competitive bid for services, and may have engaged a suspended or debarred contractor. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement necessary internal controls to ensure a competitive bid process is performed, and all vendors are reviewed for suspension and debarment, prior to entering into contracts utilizing federal awards. These internal controls should also include a conflict-of-interest clause with all vendors within contract language. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds CFDA Number: 21.027 Award Period: June 23, 2022 through June 22, 2023 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.318(a) states, ?the non-Federal entity must have and use document procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward.? In addition, per the Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.214, non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. The regulations restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Organization had not adopted a procurement policy and no procurement procedures were performed in selecting contractors. Questioned Costs: None Cause: Procurement policies and procedures were not adopted by the Organization. Effect: The Organization may not have received a competitive bid for services, and may have engaged a suspended or debarred contractor. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement necessary internal controls to ensure a competitive bid process is performed, and all vendors are reviewed for suspension and debarment, prior to entering into contracts utilizing federal awards. These internal controls should also include a conflict-of-interest clause with all vendors within contract language. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Information on the Federal Program Federal Program Name: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Consolidated Health Centers (Community Health Centers), 93.224; Affordable Care Act (ACA) Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program, 93.527 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (2 CFR 200.318(i)), contract files must be sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In cases where competition was limited, such as scenarios where specific qualifications and competence are required, the files should provide evidence that the limitation on competition was justified. Also, the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (Appendix II to Part 200), require that Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Condition: The Organization entered to a purchase contract with a vendor that is considered a sole source purchase agreement. The Organization did not maintain and retain appropriate documentation to justify the limitation on competition related to the vendor selection and why the purchase is a sole source purchase agreement. The sole source purchase agreement entered also did not include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: During our testing of procurement requirements, the sole vendor purchase charged to the grant did not have appropriate documentation to evidence the basis of vendor selection or documentation to justify the limitation on competition vendor selection and why the purchase is a sole source purchase agreement. Also, the sole source purchase agreement does not contain the provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Effect: Vendor purchase was made without appropriate documentation to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Also, contracts were entered into and approved without the require provision of Appendix II to Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Adequate supporting documentation on the procurement was not obtained or maintained within vendor files including the justification on the limitation on competition on vendor selection. The vendor contract does not contain the necessary contract provision and language required by the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revisit controls over this compliance requirement to ensure that appropriate documentation is gathered and retained within its procurement files to support all Federally funded purchasing decisions including the justification on the limitation on competition on vendor selection for sole source contract arrangement. We also recommend the Organization to include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200 CFR on all its contracts. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See corrective action plan prepared by management attached.
Information on the Federal Program Federal Program Name: Health Center Program Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Consolidated Health Centers (Community Health Centers), 93.224; Affordable Care Act (ACA) Grants for New and Expanded Services Under the Health Center Program, 93.527 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Under Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (2 CFR 200.318(i)), contract files must be sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. In cases where competition was limited, such as scenarios where specific qualifications and competence are required, the files should provide evidence that the limitation on competition was justified. Also, the Uniform Guidance compliance requirements for Procurement (Appendix II to Part 200), require that Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Condition: The Organization entered to a purchase contract with a vendor that is considered a sole source purchase agreement. The Organization did not maintain and retain appropriate documentation to justify the limitation on competition related to the vendor selection and why the purchase is a sole source purchase agreement. The sole source purchase agreement entered also did not include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200. Questioned Costs: $0 Context: During our testing of procurement requirements, the sole vendor purchase charged to the grant did not have appropriate documentation to evidence the basis of vendor selection or documentation to justify the limitation on competition vendor selection and why the purchase is a sole source purchase agreement. Also, the sole source purchase agreement does not contain the provisions enumerated in Appendix II to Part 200 (A) to (L). Effect: Vendor purchase was made without appropriate documentation to comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. Also, contracts were entered into and approved without the require provision of Appendix II to Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Adequate supporting documentation on the procurement was not obtained or maintained within vendor files including the justification on the limitation on competition on vendor selection. The vendor contract does not contain the necessary contract provision and language required by the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Organization revisit controls over this compliance requirement to ensure that appropriate documentation is gathered and retained within its procurement files to support all Federally funded purchasing decisions including the justification on the limitation on competition on vendor selection for sole source contract arrangement. We also recommend the Organization to include the contract provision required by Appendix II to Part 200 CFR on all its contracts. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See corrective action plan prepared by management attached.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: State Administrative Matching Grants for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP Cluster) Assistance Listing Number: 10.561 Federal Award Identification and Year: 232MN101S2514, 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Human Services Pass-Through Numbers: 232MN101S2514 Compliance Requirement Affected: Procurement Award Period: Year Ended December 31, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 180.300, the County must comply with procurement requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.318. Condition: Support for the procurement method used by the County was not retained. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For one of one procurement transactions tested, support for the use of noncompetitive proposals method was not retained. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Cause: The County policy was not followed before entering into a new contract in 2022 with the vendor since it was done during the previous contract. Effect: The County could be overpaying for the transaction if not properly procured. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the County ensure they follow their countywide policies regarding federal procurement and retain documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding
Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Pass-Through Agency: Connecticut Bar Foundation Pass-Through Number: CT-RTC Award Period: 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Organization must comply with procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 within Uniform Guidance. Condition: The procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization do not include the essential elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Questioned costs: None Context: We reviewed the procurement policy and conflict of interest policy of the Organization and noted that the policies do not include the essential compliance elements as outlined in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: Management was unaware of the restrictive requirements of the new procurement standards. Effect: With the absence of a compliant policy, the Organization is at risk for noncompliance as it relates to federal procurement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review its procurement policy and conflict of interest policy and make necessary changes to comply with the criteria as set out in 2 CFR sections 200.318 and 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2022-001: Procurement policy and related contract This finding is a repeat finding of 2021-001 Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318 ? General Procurement Standards, requires non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in ?? 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: We reviewed the water utility's procurement policy and service contracts with costs reimbursed during 2022, noting they did not contain necessary federal language related to conflicts of interest and debarment and suspension. Cause: The water utility has not received federal funding in the past and did not update their procurement policy when they sought federal funding for the Great Lakes Water Supply project. Additionally, service contracts were entered into prior to receiving federal funds. Effect: Without adequate control of contract language the water utility could enter into contracts related to the Great Lakes Water Supply project that do not qualify for federal reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend the water utility review its procurement policy and make necessary updates to be in compliance with federal standards. Additionally, we recommend the utility enter into contract addendums related to contracts previously executed without required federal language. Management Response: Waukesha Water utility management has worked closely with WIFIA to craft contracts that include all necessary language prior to releasing RFPs for construction contracts. WIFIA was presented all service contracts to review prior to reimbursements received in fiscal year 2022. The finance department is working to update the procurement policy to ensure necessary federal language is included. The finance department will also work with service contractors to execute contract addendums.
2022-002 Department of Treasury, State of South Dakota Governor?s Office of Economic Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027, ConnectSD 2021-03, 2021-05 and 2021-07 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) provides that the auditee must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR 200.319(c) establishes that the auditee must have written procedures for procurement transactions that follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327 ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in sections therein. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The Company has not documented their internal controls for compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirement of Uniform Guidance as outlined above. The Company does not have a written policy related to procurement or written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurement, as well as, established procedures in place related to suspension and debarment. The Company did not follow the procurement method required based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320. For contracted vendors with expenditures in excess of $25,000, the Company did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into transaction with the vendor. Cause: The Company relied on the previous work history with vendors frequently used and did not have a process in place to monitor compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: Inadequate controls over this area of compliance result in a reasonable possibility that the Company would not have the required documentation in place and would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: We were unable to determine known questioned costs. There were three vendor transactions above the $4,000 micro purchase threshold without adequate procurement documentation which had cumulative draws in 2022 of $1,993,222. Context/Sampling: Procurement requirements were applicable to three vendors. Two vendors had expenditures in excess of $250,000. Suspension and debarment requirements were applicable to 3 vendors. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management implement formal procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment in accordance with requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 Department of Treasury, State of South Dakota Governor?s Office of Economic Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027, ConnectSD 2021-03, 2021-05 and 2021-07 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) provides that the auditee must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR 200.319(c) establishes that the auditee must have written procedures for procurement transactions that follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327 ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in sections therein. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The Company has not documented their internal controls for compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirement of Uniform Guidance as outlined above. The Company does not have a written policy related to procurement or written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurement, as well as, established procedures in place related to suspension and debarment. The Company did not follow the procurement method required based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320. For contracted vendors with expenditures in excess of $25,000, the Company did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into transaction with the vendor. Cause: The Company relied on the previous work history with vendors frequently used and did not have a process in place to monitor compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: Inadequate controls over this area of compliance result in a reasonable possibility that the Company would not have the required documentation in place and would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: We were unable to determine known questioned costs. There were three vendor transactions above the $4,000 micro purchase threshold without adequate procurement documentation which had cumulative draws in 2022 of $1,993,222. Context/Sampling: Procurement requirements were applicable to three vendors. Two vendors had expenditures in excess of $250,000. Suspension and debarment requirements were applicable to 3 vendors. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management implement formal procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment in accordance with requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-002 Department of Treasury, State of South Dakota Governor?s Office of Economic Development Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027, ConnectSD 2021-03, 2021-05 and 2021-07 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) provides that the auditee must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR 200.319(c) establishes that the auditee must have written procedures for procurement transactions that follow the procurement standards in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.327 ensuring that the procurement method used for the contracts are appropriate based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in sections therein. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition: The Company has not documented their internal controls for compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirement of Uniform Guidance as outlined above. The Company does not have a written policy related to procurement or written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurement, as well as, established procedures in place related to suspension and debarment. The Company did not follow the procurement method required based on the dollar amount and conditions specified in 2 CFR 200.320. For contracted vendors with expenditures in excess of $25,000, the Company did not verify vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into transaction with the vendor. Cause: The Company relied on the previous work history with vendors frequently used and did not have a process in place to monitor compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Effect: Inadequate controls over this area of compliance result in a reasonable possibility that the Company would not have the required documentation in place and would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: We were unable to determine known questioned costs. There were three vendor transactions above the $4,000 micro purchase threshold without adequate procurement documentation which had cumulative draws in 2022 of $1,993,222. Context/Sampling: Procurement requirements were applicable to three vendors. Two vendors had expenditures in excess of $250,000. Suspension and debarment requirements were applicable to 3 vendors. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management implement formal procedures over procurement, suspension and debarment in accordance with requirements noted above. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2022-005 Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Department of Treasury North Dakota State Water Commission Procurement Suspension & Debarment 2 CFR Part 200.318 Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.318 states that a non-Federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR part 200.317 through 200.327. Condition District does not have a written procurement policy in place. Cause The District has not approved a written procurement policy. Effect Non-compliance with Procurement Suspension & Debarment compliance requirements. Questioned Costs Not Applicable Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend for the board of the District to create and implement a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The District will create and approve a procurement policy that adheres to state and local regulations as well as 2 CFR Part 200.317 through 200.327.
Finding 2022-001 Assistance Listing Number: 93.870 Federal Program: Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Grant Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entity: Wisconsin Department of Children and Families Criteria or Specific Requirement: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) SECTIONS 200.318 THROUGH 200.236. 2 CFR section 200.318(a) indicates the non-federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in these sections. Condition: The Organization's documented procurement policies and procedures do not include certain procedures required by the procurement standards. Cause: The Organization does not have a process for reviewing its accounting policies and procedures manual on a regular basis to ensure documented procedures conform to the procurement standards. Effect or potential effect: Costs for purchases subject to the procurement standards could be disallowed if appropriate procedures are not followed. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: The Organization's procurement procedures should be reviewed and updated as needed to confirm to the procurement standards. The Organization's policies and procedures should also be reviewed and approved annually by the board of directors and management to incorporate changes to laws and regulations and internal procedures. Views of responsible officials: Easterseals Southeast Wisconsin has a policy which clearly outlines approval authorities. While we follow that policy properly, we understand that the policy lacks some elements required by the Uniform Guidance. None of our purchases made during the year under audit would have violated Uniform Guidance, but we are committed to compliance and therefore have already started to draft policies which will adhere to Uniform Guidance. We will finalize, communicate, and follow our updated Policies and Procedures to ensure that Uniform Guidance is followed and to resolve the finding from this audit.
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS City of Clarkston January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-002 The City did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 – Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: LA-10124, LA-10129, LA-9593 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2020-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,725,908 in federal Highway Planning and Construction program funds awarded from the Federal Highway Administration and passed through the Washington State Department of Transportation. During 2022, the City used program funding on three projects. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance federal procurement standards found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds. Additionally, federal regulations require recipients to maintain written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the actions of employees involved in selecting, awarding or administrating contracts procured with federal funds. Although the City has a written procurement policy, it does not conform to federal procurement standards and does not include all methods for procurement, such as architectural and engineering services and specific steps to follow for formally bidding public works projects. Additionally, the City’s policy does not include other required procedures for procuring transactions, such as contract cost or price analysis, bonding requirements, domestic preferences for procurement, contracting provisions, and more. Additionally, the City’s written conflict of interest policy does not conform to federal regulations because it does not include the following elements: • Officers, employees, and agents may not participate in selecting, awarding, or administrating a contract supported by a federal award if they have a real or apparent conflict of interest. • Officers, employees, and agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management did not dedicate the time and resources necessary to update the City’s procurement and standards of conduct procedures to ensure they conformed to Uniform Guidance before procuring transactions that it charged to the program. Effect of Condition Although the City’s policies did not conform to Uniform Guidance, our testing found the City complied with federal requirements for competitive solicitation of a public works contractor and architectural and engineering services. However, without updated written procurement and standards of conduct procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive procurement procedures and standards of conduct requirements when procuring contractors paid all or in part with federal funds. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen internal controls by updating and maintaining its written procurement and standards of conduct policies to conform to Uniform Guidance for all procurement transactions. City’s Response The City updated the policy regarding federal procurement to ensure compliance with usage of federal funds in November 2022. This audit determined that additional levels of internal control needed to be implemented to comply with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations. The City plans to update the procurement policy and standards of conduct policy to ensure that federal standards are being maintained. The City will strengthen internal controls to ensure that procurement of goods and services will comply with Uniform Guidance, the federal regulations and the City’s procurement policy. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS City of Clarkston January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-002 The City did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 – Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: LA-10124, LA-10129, LA-9593 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2020-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,725,908 in federal Highway Planning and Construction program funds awarded from the Federal Highway Administration and passed through the Washington State Department of Transportation. During 2022, the City used program funding on three projects. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance federal procurement standards found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds. Additionally, federal regulations require recipients to maintain written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the actions of employees involved in selecting, awarding or administrating contracts procured with federal funds. Although the City has a written procurement policy, it does not conform to federal procurement standards and does not include all methods for procurement, such as architectural and engineering services and specific steps to follow for formally bidding public works projects. Additionally, the City’s policy does not include other required procedures for procuring transactions, such as contract cost or price analysis, bonding requirements, domestic preferences for procurement, contracting provisions, and more. Additionally, the City’s written conflict of interest policy does not conform to federal regulations because it does not include the following elements: • Officers, employees, and agents may not participate in selecting, awarding, or administrating a contract supported by a federal award if they have a real or apparent conflict of interest. • Officers, employees, and agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management did not dedicate the time and resources necessary to update the City’s procurement and standards of conduct procedures to ensure they conformed to Uniform Guidance before procuring transactions that it charged to the program. Effect of Condition Although the City’s policies did not conform to Uniform Guidance, our testing found the City complied with federal requirements for competitive solicitation of a public works contractor and architectural and engineering services. However, without updated written procurement and standards of conduct procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive procurement procedures and standards of conduct requirements when procuring contractors paid all or in part with federal funds. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen internal controls by updating and maintaining its written procurement and standards of conduct policies to conform to Uniform Guidance for all procurement transactions. City’s Response The City updated the policy regarding federal procurement to ensure compliance with usage of federal funds in November 2022. This audit determined that additional levels of internal control needed to be implemented to comply with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations. The City plans to update the procurement policy and standards of conduct policy to ensure that federal standards are being maintained. The City will strengthen internal controls to ensure that procurement of goods and services will comply with Uniform Guidance, the federal regulations and the City’s procurement policy. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
SCHEDULE OF FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS City of Clarkston January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 2022-002 The City did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 – Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: LA-10124, LA-10129, LA-9593 Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2020-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,725,908 in federal Highway Planning and Construction program funds awarded from the Federal Highway Administration and passed through the Washington State Department of Transportation. During 2022, the City used program funding on three projects. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations require recipients to follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance federal procurement standards found in 2 CFR 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds. Additionally, federal regulations require recipients to maintain written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the actions of employees involved in selecting, awarding or administrating contracts procured with federal funds. Although the City has a written procurement policy, it does not conform to federal procurement standards and does not include all methods for procurement, such as architectural and engineering services and specific steps to follow for formally bidding public works projects. Additionally, the City’s policy does not include other required procedures for procuring transactions, such as contract cost or price analysis, bonding requirements, domestic preferences for procurement, contracting provisions, and more. Additionally, the City’s written conflict of interest policy does not conform to federal regulations because it does not include the following elements: • Officers, employees, and agents may not participate in selecting, awarding, or administrating a contract supported by a federal award if they have a real or apparent conflict of interest. • Officers, employees, and agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. We consider this internal control deficiency to be a significant deficiency. Cause of Condition Management did not dedicate the time and resources necessary to update the City’s procurement and standards of conduct procedures to ensure they conformed to Uniform Guidance before procuring transactions that it charged to the program. Effect of Condition Although the City’s policies did not conform to Uniform Guidance, our testing found the City complied with federal requirements for competitive solicitation of a public works contractor and architectural and engineering services. However, without updated written procurement and standards of conduct procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive procurement procedures and standards of conduct requirements when procuring contractors paid all or in part with federal funds. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen internal controls by updating and maintaining its written procurement and standards of conduct policies to conform to Uniform Guidance for all procurement transactions. City’s Response The City updated the policy regarding federal procurement to ensure compliance with usage of federal funds in November 2022. This audit determined that additional levels of internal control needed to be implemented to comply with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations. The City plans to update the procurement policy and standards of conduct policy to ensure that federal standards are being maintained. The City will strengthen internal controls to ensure that procurement of goods and services will comply with Uniform Guidance, the federal regulations and the City’s procurement policy. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this finding and thank the City for its cooperation and assistance during the audit. We will review the corrective action taken during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
Finding 2022-006 Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment – Material Weakness. Criteria: In accordance with §200.318, the non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal law and the standards identified. Additionally, the nonfederal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of the procurement. These records are required to include but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. All procurement transactions must be conducted in in accordance with §200.317 through §200.327. In accordance with §200.214 non-federal entities cannot enter into awards, subawards, or contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in federal assistance programs or activities. Non-federal entities must either check for exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM); collect a certification from the entity or add a clause or condition to the covered transaction with the entity prior to entering into a covered transaction with a non-federal entity. Condition: The Organization also has standard procurement procedures in place guiding purchasing decisions. However, due to need for expediency in choosing a contract that is partially funded by the federal award, the board of directors approved waiving the normal bidding process. The Organization also did not perform or document suspension and debarment checks on prospective vendors and subrecipients. Cause: The Organization’s personnel did not ensure to follow documented policies and procedures for selecting a contractor that were in compliance with the CFR 200. Additionally, the Organization did not have adequate internal controls in place to identify the need to ensure a check for suspended or debarred vendors on contractors occurred and was documented prior to entering into those agreements. Effect: Failure to maintain policies for vendor selection process and failure to obtain vendor solicitation for procurements is noncompliance with federal regulations. This leads to the possibility that resources were purchased from vendors who were suspended and/or debarred. Questioned Costs: Unknown Repeat Finding: Not applicable as the Organization is a first time auditee. Recommendation: Standard forms should be updated to incorporate procurement and suspension and debarment criteria for both vendors and subrecipients. Controls should be implemented to ensure that the procurement decisions and suspension and debarment checks are reviewed by an appropriate member of management and are properly stored for future reference. Views of Responsible Official: See Corrective Action Plan.
The City did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STPUS-5924(005) / SRTS 5906(001) / SRTS 9909(004) / NHPP-5908(010) / NHPP- 5908(011) / NHFP-5908(013) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2021-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,601,328 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the City’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. This issue was reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition During the 2021 audit, management and staff said they did not know the City was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Our prior year audit report was released on December 22, 2022, so the City was unable to implement changes before or during the current audit period. Effect of Condition Although the City did not establish its own written policy before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding public works contracts. However, without written policies and procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state, or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the City establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. City’s Response This is a repeat finding from our 2021 federal audit that was completed in December 2022. The City adopted a robust procurement policy in early 2023 as quickly as we possibly could after receiving the 2021 audit finding. It was impossible for the City to establish the procurement policy in 2022 as the audit finished so late in the year. While the City did not have an internal policy, the City strictly follows the procurement policies outlined by the federal and/or state funding agencies partnered on our projects. Outside of the specific funding agency guidelines, the City follows the Washington State Department of Transportation Local Agency Guidelines. The City is not recognized in WSDOTs Certification Acceptance program, meaning all FHWA funded project development and construction administration activities must have WSDOT Local Program oversight. This stewardship ensures all money spent follows FHWA standards. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this issue. We will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
The City did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STPUS-5924(005) / SRTS 5906(001) / SRTS 9909(004) / NHPP-5908(010) / NHPP- 5908(011) / NHFP-5908(013) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2021-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,601,328 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the City’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. This issue was reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition During the 2021 audit, management and staff said they did not know the City was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Our prior year audit report was released on December 22, 2022, so the City was unable to implement changes before or during the current audit period. Effect of Condition Although the City did not establish its own written policy before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding public works contracts. However, without written policies and procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state, or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the City establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. City’s Response This is a repeat finding from our 2021 federal audit that was completed in December 2022. The City adopted a robust procurement policy in early 2023 as quickly as we possibly could after receiving the 2021 audit finding. It was impossible for the City to establish the procurement policy in 2022 as the audit finished so late in the year. While the City did not have an internal policy, the City strictly follows the procurement policies outlined by the federal and/or state funding agencies partnered on our projects. Outside of the specific funding agency guidelines, the City follows the Washington State Department of Transportation Local Agency Guidelines. The City is not recognized in WSDOTs Certification Acceptance program, meaning all FHWA funded project development and construction administration activities must have WSDOT Local Program oversight. This stewardship ensures all money spent follows FHWA standards. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this issue. We will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
The City did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STPUS-5924(005) / SRTS 5906(001) / SRTS 9909(004) / NHPP-5908(010) / NHPP- 5908(011) / NHFP-5908(013) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2021-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,601,328 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the City’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. This issue was reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition During the 2021 audit, management and staff said they did not know the City was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Our prior year audit report was released on December 22, 2022, so the City was unable to implement changes before or during the current audit period. Effect of Condition Although the City did not establish its own written policy before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding public works contracts. However, without written policies and procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state, or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the City establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. City’s Response This is a repeat finding from our 2021 federal audit that was completed in December 2022. The City adopted a robust procurement policy in early 2023 as quickly as we possibly could after receiving the 2021 audit finding. It was impossible for the City to establish the procurement policy in 2022 as the audit finished so late in the year. While the City did not have an internal policy, the City strictly follows the procurement policies outlined by the federal and/or state funding agencies partnered on our projects. Outside of the specific funding agency guidelines, the City follows the Washington State Department of Transportation Local Agency Guidelines. The City is not recognized in WSDOTs Certification Acceptance program, meaning all FHWA funded project development and construction administration activities must have WSDOT Local Program oversight. This stewardship ensures all money spent follows FHWA standards. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this issue. We will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
The City did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STPUS-5924(005) / SRTS 5906(001) / SRTS 9909(004) / NHPP-5908(010) / NHPP- 5908(011) / NHFP-5908(013) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2021-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,601,328 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the City’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. This issue was reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition During the 2021 audit, management and staff said they did not know the City was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Our prior year audit report was released on December 22, 2022, so the City was unable to implement changes before or during the current audit period. Effect of Condition Although the City did not establish its own written policy before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding public works contracts. However, without written policies and procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state, or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the City establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. City’s Response This is a repeat finding from our 2021 federal audit that was completed in December 2022. The City adopted a robust procurement policy in early 2023 as quickly as we possibly could after receiving the 2021 audit finding. It was impossible for the City to establish the procurement policy in 2022 as the audit finished so late in the year. While the City did not have an internal policy, the City strictly follows the procurement policies outlined by the federal and/or state funding agencies partnered on our projects. Outside of the specific funding agency guidelines, the City follows the Washington State Department of Transportation Local Agency Guidelines. The City is not recognized in WSDOTs Certification Acceptance program, meaning all FHWA funded project development and construction administration activities must have WSDOT Local Program oversight. This stewardship ensures all money spent follows FHWA standards. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this issue. We will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
The City did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STPUS-5924(005) / SRTS 5906(001) / SRTS 9909(004) / NHPP-5908(010) / NHPP- 5908(011) / NHFP-5908(013) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2021-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,601,328 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the City’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. This issue was reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition During the 2021 audit, management and staff said they did not know the City was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Our prior year audit report was released on December 22, 2022, so the City was unable to implement changes before or during the current audit period. Effect of Condition Although the City did not establish its own written policy before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding public works contracts. However, without written policies and procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state, or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the City establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. City’s Response This is a repeat finding from our 2021 federal audit that was completed in December 2022. The City adopted a robust procurement policy in early 2023 as quickly as we possibly could after receiving the 2021 audit finding. It was impossible for the City to establish the procurement policy in 2022 as the audit finished so late in the year. While the City did not have an internal policy, the City strictly follows the procurement policies outlined by the federal and/or state funding agencies partnered on our projects. Outside of the specific funding agency guidelines, the City follows the Washington State Department of Transportation Local Agency Guidelines. The City is not recognized in WSDOTs Certification Acceptance program, meaning all FHWA funded project development and construction administration activities must have WSDOT Local Program oversight. This stewardship ensures all money spent follows FHWA standards. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this issue. We will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
The City did not have adequate controls for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction Federal Grantor Name: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: Washington State Department of Transportation Pass-through Award/Contract Number: STPUS-5924(005) / SRTS 5906(001) / SRTS 9909(004) / NHPP-5908(010) / NHPP- 5908(011) / NHFP-5908(013) Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: Yes, Finding 2021-001 Description of Condition During fiscal year 2022, the City spent $1,601,328 in Highway Planning and Construction program funds. The program’s objective is to provide funds for the planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation of highways and bridge transportation systems. Federal regulations require recipients to establish and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal regulations also require recipients to establish and follow their own documented procurement procedures, which must conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards found in 2 CFR § 200.318-327. The procedures must reflect the most restrictive of applicable federal, state or local procurement thresholds and methods when using federal funds to procure goods and services. Governments must apply the more restrictive requirements by obtaining quotes or following a competitive procurement process, depending on the estimated cost of the procurement activity. Our audit found the City’s internal controls were ineffective for ensuring compliance with federal procurement requirements. Specifically, the City did not establish its own written procurement procedures, as federal regulations require. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a significant deficiency. This issue was reported as a finding in the prior audit. Cause of Condition During the 2021 audit, management and staff said they did not know the City was required to have and use its own written procurement procedures. Our prior year audit report was released on December 22, 2022, so the City was unable to implement changes before or during the current audit period. Effect of Condition Although the City did not establish its own written policy before procuring with program funds, it did comply with federal requirements for soliciting and awarding public works contracts. However, without written policies and procedures, the City is at greater risk of noncompliance with the most restrictive of federal, state, or local procurement methods and requirements when using federal funds to procure contractors. Recommendation We recommend the City establish written procurement procedures that conform to federal procurement requirements. City’s Response This is a repeat finding from our 2021 federal audit that was completed in December 2022. The City adopted a robust procurement policy in early 2023 as quickly as we possibly could after receiving the 2021 audit finding. It was impossible for the City to establish the procurement policy in 2022 as the audit finished so late in the year. While the City did not have an internal policy, the City strictly follows the procurement policies outlined by the federal and/or state funding agencies partnered on our projects. Outside of the specific funding agency guidelines, the City follows the Washington State Department of Transportation Local Agency Guidelines. The City is not recognized in WSDOTs Certification Acceptance program, meaning all FHWA funded project development and construction administration activities must have WSDOT Local Program oversight. This stewardship ensures all money spent follows FHWA standards. Auditor’s Remarks We appreciate the City’s commitment to resolving this issue. We will review the condition during our next audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Section 318, General procurement standards, establishes requirements for written procedures.
Condition: The Organization does not have a documented procurement policy that conforms to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Context: During the year, the Organization made a purchase of property that was greater than the Simple Acquisition Threshold of $250,000. As part of the audit procedures, we requested the Organization’s documented procurement policy. The Organization did not have a documented procurement policy. Prior to making purchases in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, the Organization performed a price analysis in a manner consistent with 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The Organization was not aware that a documented procurement policy was required. Criteria: Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Effect: Without documented procurement policies, the Organization could procure assets in a manner that is not consistent with 2 CFR Part 200. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization familiarize themselves with the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and develop a documented procurement policy that conforms to applicable federal statutes and procurement requirements. Management’s Response: Management agrees.
Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI081935 – 2022, H79TI080298 – 2022, H79TI085517 – 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Pierce County Pass-Through Number(s): SC-107323, SC-105454, SC-110121 Award Period: May 31, 2022 through May 30, 2023, September 30, 2017 through September 29, 2022, September 30, 2022 through September 29, 2027. Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 requires non-federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures. 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that "the non-Federal entity must maintain record sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price". In addition, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states that "... If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity". 2 CFR 180.300 states that before entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, an entity must verify that the person with whom they intend to do business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by “(a) Checking SAM exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person”. Condition: The Alliance does not have a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy nor procedures in place at the time of the audit in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For procurement, CLA tested all purchases exceeding $3,500 (the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy). For the 5 sampled procurement selections, documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons prior to exercising the procurement, as required by 2 CFR 200.320. For suspension and debarment, CLA tested all payments to vendors exceeding $25,000 as established by Uniform Guidance. Of the 3 tested, there was no documentary evidence that procedures were performed prior to entering into the covered transaction using the allowable methods as described at 2 CFR 180.300. Questioned costs: Undeterminable. Context: Procurement: A sample of 5 was made from a population of 16 procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded $3,500 (the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy), amounting to $48,099. Of the 5 sampled costs, all were found to be out of compliance with the Procurement requirements, as a written procurement policy was not in place and documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons. Suspension and Debarment: A sample of 3 (entire population) was made from a population of 3 vendors who received payments exceeding $25,000. Of the 3 sampled vendors, there was no documentary evidence that procedures were performed prior to entering into the covered transaction using the allowable methods as described at 2 CFR 180.300. Cause: Management believes procurement, suspension and debarment standards apply only to the awarding agency, and not to the Alliance. Effect: Purchases may occur that do not follow the procurement, suspension and debarment standards as required by Uniform Guidance, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Alliance design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. These procedures should include documenting the date that suspension and debarment verifications are made. In addition, we recommended the Alliance to formally adopt a Procurement, Suspension and Debarment policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The Alliance followed this recommendation, pairing prior (non-federally implicated) procurement processes and expenditures. Views of responsible officials: Management has provided a response to the finding in their Corrective Action Plan.
Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI081935 – 2022, H79TI080298 – 2022, H79TI085517 – 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Pierce County Pass-Through Number(s): SC-107323, SC-105454, SC-110121 Award Period: May 31, 2022 through May 30, 2023, September 30, 2017 through September 29, 2022, September 30, 2022 through September 29, 2027. Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 requires non-federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures. 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that "the non-Federal entity must maintain record sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price". In addition, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states that "... If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity". 2 CFR 180.300 states that before entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, an entity must verify that the person with whom they intend to do business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by “(a) Checking SAM exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person”. Condition: The Alliance does not have a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy nor procedures in place at the time of the audit in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For procurement, CLA tested all purchases exceeding $3,500 (the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy). For the 5 sampled procurement selections, documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons prior to exercising the procurement, as required by 2 CFR 200.320. For suspension and debarment, CLA tested all payments to vendors exceeding $25,000 as established by Uniform Guidance. Of the 3 tested, there was no documentary evidence that procedures were performed prior to entering into the covered transaction using the allowable methods as described at 2 CFR 180.300. Questioned costs: Undeterminable. Context: Procurement: A sample of 5 was made from a population of 16 procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded $3,500 (the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy), amounting to $48,099. Of the 5 sampled costs, all were found to be out of compliance with the Procurement requirements, as a written procurement policy was not in place and documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons. Suspension and Debarment: A sample of 3 (entire population) was made from a population of 3 vendors who received payments exceeding $25,000. Of the 3 sampled vendors, there was no documentary evidence that procedures were performed prior to entering into the covered transaction using the allowable methods as described at 2 CFR 180.300. Cause: Management believes procurement, suspension and debarment standards apply only to the awarding agency, and not to the Alliance. Effect: Purchases may occur that do not follow the procurement, suspension and debarment standards as required by Uniform Guidance, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Alliance design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. These procedures should include documenting the date that suspension and debarment verifications are made. In addition, we recommended the Alliance to formally adopt a Procurement, Suspension and Debarment policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The Alliance followed this recommendation, pairing prior (non-federally implicated) procurement processes and expenditures. Views of responsible officials: Management has provided a response to the finding in their Corrective Action Plan.
Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI081935 – 2022, H79TI080298 – 2022, H79TI085517 – 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Pierce County Pass-Through Number(s): SC-107323, SC-105454, SC-110121 Award Period: May 31, 2022 through May 30, 2023, September 30, 2017 through September 29, 2022, September 30, 2022 through September 29, 2027. Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 requires non-federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures. 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that "the non-Federal entity must maintain record sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price". In addition, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states that "... If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity". 2 CFR 180.300 states that before entering into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, an entity must verify that the person with whom they intend to do business with is not excluded or disqualified. This can be done by “(a) Checking SAM exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person”. Condition: The Alliance does not have a written procurement, suspension and debarment policy nor procedures in place at the time of the audit in compliance with Uniform Guidance. For procurement, CLA tested all purchases exceeding $3,500 (the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy). For the 5 sampled procurement selections, documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons prior to exercising the procurement, as required by 2 CFR 200.320. For suspension and debarment, CLA tested all payments to vendors exceeding $25,000 as established by Uniform Guidance. Of the 3 tested, there was no documentary evidence that procedures were performed prior to entering into the covered transaction using the allowable methods as described at 2 CFR 180.300. Questioned costs: Undeterminable. Context: Procurement: A sample of 5 was made from a population of 16 procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded $3,500 (the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy), amounting to $48,099. Of the 5 sampled costs, all were found to be out of compliance with the Procurement requirements, as a written procurement policy was not in place and documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons. Suspension and Debarment: A sample of 3 (entire population) was made from a population of 3 vendors who received payments exceeding $25,000. Of the 3 sampled vendors, there was no documentary evidence that procedures were performed prior to entering into the covered transaction using the allowable methods as described at 2 CFR 180.300. Cause: Management believes procurement, suspension and debarment standards apply only to the awarding agency, and not to the Alliance. Effect: Purchases may occur that do not follow the procurement, suspension and debarment standards as required by Uniform Guidance, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the Alliance design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. These procedures should include documenting the date that suspension and debarment verifications are made. In addition, we recommended the Alliance to formally adopt a Procurement, Suspension and Debarment policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance. The Alliance followed this recommendation, pairing prior (non-federally implicated) procurement processes and expenditures. Views of responsible officials: Management has provided a response to the finding in their Corrective Action Plan.
Department of the Treasury, Passed through North Dakota Office of Management and Budget Federal Financial Assistance Listing 21.027 COVID‐19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria – Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 set forth the procurement standards non‐federal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs and the procurement procedures required. Condition – In our testing of procurement, suspension, and debarment it was identified that the City did not have a written policy on procurement that satisfied the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause – Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under the Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect – A lack of compliant policies increases the overall risk of non‐compliance. Questioned Costs – None reported. Context/Sampling – Overall procurement policy. Repeat Finding from Prior Years – Yes, prior year finding 2021‐003. Recommendation – We recommend that management establish a written policy that is in compliance with all of the procurement requirements for federal programs as identified in 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 and maintain adequate supporting documentation and records to document history and methods of procurement and the procedures performed to comply with these CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials – There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: State of Arizona, the Office of the Governor Pass-Through Number(s): GR-ARPA-AHCA-050122-01 Award Period: May 1, 2022 - June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Condition/Context: The following compliance matters were noted over procurement: 1. The Association did not maintain a formalized and written procurement policy. 2. Twelve vendor purchases for workforce development training, with costs between $10,000 and $15,000 each, were selected for testing. However, the Association did not follow the required solicitation or bidding procedures for any of its workforce development training vendors or program. The Association awarded contracts to all vendors within the state that elected to participate in the program. 3. For three of three vendors tested, procedures to determine that the vendors were not included on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration were not performed. Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with the Compliance Supplement, Part 6 – Internal Control, 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318 (a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 (a)(2)(i), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Small purchase procedures - the acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. Criteria or specific requirement (Continued) In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 (b)(1 and 2), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Formal procurement methods - when the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the SAT, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319 or paragraph (c) of this section. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines to be appropriate: (1) sealed bids, or (2) proposals. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 (c), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Noncompetitive procurement: there are specific circumstances in which noncompetitive procurement can be used. Noncompetitive procurement can only be awarded if one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (see paragraph (a)(1) of this section); (2) The item is available only from a single source; (3) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from publicizing a competitive solicitation; (4) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes a noncompetitive procurement in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (5) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. In accordance with 2 CFR 180.220, the non-Federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. Questioned costs: None. Cause: The Organization did not have established procurement policies and did not have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those policies. Management awarded training contracts to all vendors who agreed to participate in the grant award program. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the Compliance Supplement and the Code of Federal Regulations related to procurement and suspension and debarment provisions. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt a formal and written procurement policy. Additionally, management should develop controls to help ensure procurement procedures are followed and to monitor the amount spent with vendors throughout the year to ensure procurement procedures are initiated when the vendor costs exceed the procurement thresholds. These procedures will help ensure compliance with Compliance Supplement and the Code of Federal Regulations related to procurement and suspension and debarment provisions. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the audit condition.
Finding 2022–003: Procurement Federal Department: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agencies: Cook County, Illinois and Women's Business Development Center COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Criteria 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post-Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management Section 200.318, General procurement standards (a) states “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Section 200.317 through 200.327.” Section 200.318 (i) states “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” SDA’s Fiscal Policies and Procedures Manual updated July 21, 2022 (“the Manual”) states “Procurement shall be made using one of the following methods: 1) Micro and Small Purchase Threshold; 2) Competitive Sealed Bids and Competitive Negotiations and 3) Non-Competitive Negotiations. All methods of procurement, when funded by federal grants or contracts, must follow procurement requirements contained in the OMB, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for federal awards. Any purchases over $10,000 must bid competitively if subject to a single federal audit.” In addition, the Manual states “purchases related to Federally funded grants over $10,000 will be bid through either a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process. In addition, Request for Information (RFI) process may be used to help inform the development of either RFP, RFQ or other forms of procurement. Awards will be awarded to responses that meet the outlined criteria and reflect the lowest responsible bid. Contractors will be excluded from conducting business with the SDA if the contractor has been debarred and/or suspended from conducting business with the federal government. On a regular basis, the SDA will check vendors for any debarment status change on the federal System for Award Management (SAM). All source documents supporting any given transaction (e.g., receipts, invoices, and RFP data) will be retained and filed with SDA contract files in a centralized location. At a minimum, source document data must be sufficient to establish the basis for selection, the basis for the cost (including the reasonableness of cost), the rationale for the method of procurement and selection of contract type, and the basis for payment.” Condition During the current audit period, SDA did not adequately ensure federally funded contract issued to vendors followed federal regulations and its internal policy, which includes maintaining documents to support its procurement decisions. Cause Based on our discussions with management, SDA completed the RFQ process for this vendor but did not maintain the documentation of the decision-making process and scoring as outlined in its procurement policy. The documentation was deleted by a staff member who left the organization. Effect The failure to maintain adequate documentation to support the procurement of federally funded contracts is a violation of federal regulations. Questioned Costs None. Context During the test of procurement, SDA management identified two contracts with expenditures over the $10,000 threshold requiring competitive bid per its internal policy. For one contract, management noted that procurement was completed in 2021, hence outside the audit period. For the second contract, we noted that while an RFQ was obtained from the contractor, there was no evidence to support the basis for contractor selection (based on evaluation criteria and scoring outlined in the RFQ), the basis for the contract price, and evidence that debarment/suspension verification checks were performed prior to awarding the contract. Identification of Repeated Findings None. Recommendation We recommend that SDA’s management adhere to its written policy and maintain documentation to support all management decisions related to federally funded procurements to comply with federal regulations. Also, SDA should consider creating a checklist/internal form to document its procurement decisions and related approvals, as required. We also recommend that SDA develop procedures to identify all federally funded contracts let/awarded during the fiscal year to ensure compliance with its internal policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action SDA agrees with the finding and recommendation. See SDA’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 40–44.
Finding 2022–003: Procurement Federal Department: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Agencies: Cook County, Illinois and Women's Business Development Center COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Criteria 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post-Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management Section 200.318, General procurement standards (a) states “the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in Section 200.317 through 200.327.” Section 200.318 (i) states “the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” SDA’s Fiscal Policies and Procedures Manual updated July 21, 2022 (“the Manual”) states “Procurement shall be made using one of the following methods: 1) Micro and Small Purchase Threshold; 2) Competitive Sealed Bids and Competitive Negotiations and 3) Non-Competitive Negotiations. All methods of procurement, when funded by federal grants or contracts, must follow procurement requirements contained in the OMB, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for federal awards. Any purchases over $10,000 must bid competitively if subject to a single federal audit.” In addition, the Manual states “purchases related to Federally funded grants over $10,000 will be bid through either a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process. In addition, Request for Information (RFI) process may be used to help inform the development of either RFP, RFQ or other forms of procurement. Awards will be awarded to responses that meet the outlined criteria and reflect the lowest responsible bid. Contractors will be excluded from conducting business with the SDA if the contractor has been debarred and/or suspended from conducting business with the federal government. On a regular basis, the SDA will check vendors for any debarment status change on the federal System for Award Management (SAM). All source documents supporting any given transaction (e.g., receipts, invoices, and RFP data) will be retained and filed with SDA contract files in a centralized location. At a minimum, source document data must be sufficient to establish the basis for selection, the basis for the cost (including the reasonableness of cost), the rationale for the method of procurement and selection of contract type, and the basis for payment.” Condition During the current audit period, SDA did not adequately ensure federally funded contract issued to vendors followed federal regulations and its internal policy, which includes maintaining documents to support its procurement decisions. Cause Based on our discussions with management, SDA completed the RFQ process for this vendor but did not maintain the documentation of the decision-making process and scoring as outlined in its procurement policy. The documentation was deleted by a staff member who left the organization. Effect The failure to maintain adequate documentation to support the procurement of federally funded contracts is a violation of federal regulations. Questioned Costs None. Context During the test of procurement, SDA management identified two contracts with expenditures over the $10,000 threshold requiring competitive bid per its internal policy. For one contract, management noted that procurement was completed in 2021, hence outside the audit period. For the second contract, we noted that while an RFQ was obtained from the contractor, there was no evidence to support the basis for contractor selection (based on evaluation criteria and scoring outlined in the RFQ), the basis for the contract price, and evidence that debarment/suspension verification checks were performed prior to awarding the contract. Identification of Repeated Findings None. Recommendation We recommend that SDA’s management adhere to its written policy and maintain documentation to support all management decisions related to federally funded procurements to comply with federal regulations. Also, SDA should consider creating a checklist/internal form to document its procurement decisions and related approvals, as required. We also recommend that SDA develop procedures to identify all federally funded contracts let/awarded during the fiscal year to ensure compliance with its internal policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action SDA agrees with the finding and recommendation. See SDA’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 40–44.
Finding 2022-003: Lack of Documented Procurement Procedures U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Section 223 Demonstration Programs for Improving Community Mental Health Services – Assistance Listing No. 93.829 Compliance Findings: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (I) Criteria: The Standard Terms and Conditons for all SAMHSA’s awards requires that grantees comply with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) section 200.318 through 200.321. In accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320, a non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.320 for any method of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or sub-award. Condition: The Organization does not have documented procurement procedures that incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.320. Cause: Unknown. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.320 or the terms of the grant agreement. Identification of Repeat Finding: Not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt a written procurement policy which includes all requirements of 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.320. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding and will adopt a documented procurement policy consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.320 to use for procurement of the acquisition of property or services required under federal awards or sub-awards. Additional details can be found in the Organization’s Corrective Action Plan.
Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense Federal Program Name: Natural Resource Survey and Habitat Enhancement Assistance Listing Number: 12.005 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI083313 - 2020 Pass-Through Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Pass-Through Number(s): W912DW-20-2-0003 Award Period: September 28, 2020, through September 27, 2025 Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.320 requires non-federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures. 2 CFR 200.318(i) states that "the non-Federal entity must maintain record sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price". In addition, 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2)(i) states that "... If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity". Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the Organization was not performing suspension and debarment checks prior to entering into vendor contracts to ensure the vendor was not listed in the suspended or debarred database maintained by the General Services Administration. In addition, The Organization does not have an established procurement policy nor procedures in place at the time of the audit in compliance with Uniform Guidance. CLA tested all purchases exceeding $3,500 (the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy). For the 8 sampled procurement selections, documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons prior to exercising the procurement, as required by 2 CFR 200.320. Questioned costs: None. Context: A sample of 8 was made from a population of 29 procurement transactions charged to the major program that exceeded $3,500 ((the minimum micropurchase threshold before it was increased by the FAR to $10,000 for those with an established policy), amounting to $69,944.43. Of the 8 sampled costs, all were found to be out of compliance with the Procurement requirements, as a written procurement policy was not in place and documentation was not retained for the adequate number of price comparisons. Cause: Staff were not aware of the specific compliance requirements and procedures for procurement, suspension and debarment status. Effect: Purchases may occur that do not follow the procurement, suspension and debarment standards as required by Uniform Guidance, and contracts to vendors that had been suspended or debarred could be awarded and not detected. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine they are not suspended or debarred. These procedures should include documenting the date that suspension and debarment verifications are made. In addition, we recommend The Organization formally adopt a Procurement, Suspension and Debarment policy in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Federal Program: 594 Environmental Infrastructure Assistance Program (AL 12.U01): Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Criteria: Per Uniform Guidance, “Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect appliable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Furthermore, “Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition: During testing, we noted that the City does not have a procurement policy in place that follows Uniform Guidance. Also, we noted that the City entered into two covered transactions with vendors who were not reviewed for suspension and debarment before entering into these transactions. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The City does not have a procurement policy that follows Uniform Guidance. Also, we tested two vendors who were not reviewed for suspension and debarment from a population of two. Cause: Management Oversight. Effect: The City is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance. Also, there is an increased risk of the City entering into a covered transaction with an entity that is suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The City should implement a written procurement policy that follows Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, vendors should be reviewed for suspension and debarment before entering into a covered transaction. View of Responsible Officials: The City agrees with the recommendation.
2022-002 - Procurement, Suspension & Debarment Federal Program Information: ALN - 20.205 - Highway Planning and Construction Cluster Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the Town did not have a procurement policy in place. Cause: The Town needs to adopt a procurement policy to comply with Uniform Guidance. Effect: Procurements might not conform to applicable Federal laws. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The entire population Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Town adopt a procurement policy that follows the Uniform Guidance and that the Town implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that the adopted policy is followed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Client agrees with finding, and a version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan. Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Town of Brownington.
Finding 2022-002: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Assistance Listing Number: 19.510 Federal Program: U.S. Refugee Admissions Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of State Pass-Through Entity: Church World Service Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Per guidance 2 CFR section 200.320, non-Federal entities must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.320, 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319. Condition: We noted Team Rubicon’s procurement policy was missing key detail, including procurement procedures related to conflicts of interest, the search for suspended and debarred parties, and approved methods of procurement, including the specific situations where noncompetitive procurement is appropriate. Cause: The error was primarily due to a misunderstanding of certain federal compliance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: A failure to identify federal compliance requirements could result in Team Rubicon not being in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of federal awards. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: During the year ended December 31, 2022, Team Rubicon was a recipient of a federal award, making Team Rubicon a subrecipient of the award and subject to certain federal compliance requirements including Procurement and Suspension and Debarment. Repeat Finding: Not applicable Recommendation: Management is responsible for establishing controls and procedures to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees and acknowledges the finding.
Finding 2022-007 – Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the stormwater project totaling $1,783,033 for the year ended December 31, 2022 followed formal procurement procedures. The stormwater contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows Uniform Guidance procurement standards. View of Responsible Official: The City agrees. See the corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-007 – Procurement US Department of the Treasury – COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) (ALN 21.027) Condition: The City could not provide evidence that the stormwater project totaling $1,783,033 for the year ended December 31, 2022 followed formal procurement procedures. The stormwater contract exceeds the Uniform Guidance formal procurement methods. In addition, in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, a purchase price from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania COSTARS cooperative purchasing program is considered to be only one competitive price proposal and it cannot replace a full procurement process. Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance procurement requirements found in 2 CFR Part 200.318 through 200.327, the City is required to ensure that procurement methods used for purchases are appropriate based on the dollar amount of the purchase. Cause: Procedures in place to ensure that the proper procurement process is followed were not adequate. Effect: The City was not in compliance with the procurement requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: Yes Questioned costs: Unknown Recommendation: We recommend that the City establish procedures to ensure that their purchasing policy follows Uniform Guidance procurement standards. View of Responsible Official: The City agrees. See the corrective action plan.
2022-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Questioned Costs: No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy.
2022-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Questioned Costs: No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy.
2022-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Questioned Costs: No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy.
2022-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Finding Type: Material Noncompliance; Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Program: Rural Communities Opioid Response – Planning/Rural Health Outreach and Rural Network Development Program (AL# 93.912); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Direct award; all grant numbers. Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. Condition: The Organization's procurement policies were not complete and the Organization did not follow the federal procurement standards which provides specific guidance including process and documentation requirements necessary to be in compliance as required by the 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. Cause: The Organization’s procurement policies do not include the federal procurement requirements noted at 2 CFR section 200.318 through 200.326. Additionally, the Organization did not maintain the required procurement documentation, provide for full and open competition, or provide support for limitation of such competition. Effect: Future procurement arrangements may not meet the federal guidelines necessary for projects funded by federal sources. The Organization may have to pay back funds received for a project where federal funds were used for the procurement of products or services, but the required federal process was not met. Questioned Costs: No costs were questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation: The Organization should update their procurement policy to include all requirements as noted in 2 CFR sections 200.318-200.326 and ensure that all future agreements follow the required processes. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and plans to update their procurement policy.