Lack of Formally Adopted Procurement Policy 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance) (Section I – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment) Condition: The Organization does not have a documented procurement policy in place. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement, Section I, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, recipients are expected to have procurement policies and procedures in place that comply with the procurement standards outlined in Title 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327. Cause: The Organization obtained their first federal funding as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Organization did not have a documented procurement policy in place to meet the criteria required under Uniform Guidance. As a result, even though expenditures over $15,000 require additional approvals, no documented policy was in place during 2023. Effect: Lack of a documented procurement policy could result in inappropriate vendor preferences or conflicts of interest. Recommendation: We recommend a formal written procurement policy be implemented that complies with Uniform Guidance. Management’s Response: See accompanying management’s corrective action plan.
Federal Program Information Federal Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Pass-Through Entity: Virginia Department of Health Pass-Through Entity Number: Not Applicable Awards: Assistance Listing Number 93.918 – Grants to Provide Outpatient Early Intervention Services with Respect to HIV Disease (Part C) Award Periods: May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023; May 1, 2023 to April 30, 2024 Description: Documentation of Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria In accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200.303, Internal controls, “The Non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Part 200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed states the following: “The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319” regarding the methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Condition As part of our testing over the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Procurement, Suspension and Debarment assertion, we noted that the System had a procurement policy that included procedures for small purchases (i.e. purchases between $50,000-$250,000) in which management obtains one or more sources from suppliers or public websites in order to document justification for vendor approval. However, records were not maintained to document the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Management also validates that vendors are reviewed on a monthly basis to ensure they are not included on the suspension and debarment list. There was no documentation to support completeness and accuracy of the vendor list for suspension and debarment. Cause The System did not retain documentation to support compliance with the procurement policy that conforms to the provisions required by the Uniform Guidance. The System did not retain documentation to support the completeness and accuracy of the vendor list for suspension and debarment. Effect or potential effect Purchasing of goods and/or servicing with the grant funds may not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. The vendor list for suspension and debarment may not be complete and accurate and therefore, federal funds may be used to pay a contractor that is suspended or debarred. Questioned costs None. Identification of a repeat finding This is not a repeat finding. Context Small purchases were $106,345, which represents approximately 3% of total federal expenditures of $3,589,730 reported on the Schedule for the year ended December 31, 2023. Management subsequently documented the rationale for the procurement method, contract type selection, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. As part of our testing for suspension and debarment, we did not identify any vendors that were excluded from the suspension and debarment list that were part of the grant. Recommendation The System should update its process to ensure documentation is retained consistent with the procurement policy and suspension and debarment for purchasing goods and/or services with federal funds. View of responsible officials Management concurs with the finding and will implement procedures to documentation is retained to support procurement and suspension and debarment.
Mental and Behavioral Health Education and Training Grants Federal Assistance Listing No. 93.732 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Year 2023 Criteria or Specific Requirement – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment (2 CFR 200.317 – 200.327; 2 CFR 180.220) Condition – The District is required to follow their own documented procurement procedures which conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Questioned Costs – $76,751 Context – Out of a population of nine contracts directly charged to the grant that were above the micro-purchase threshold, 2 contracts were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not and was not meant to be statistically valid. The District did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for one of the vendors selected for testing. Effect – The District did not provide for full and open competition in procuring services with grant funds. Cause – The District had previously been using the vendor and added services to meet the requirements of the grant, and the District did not follow procurement procedures and policies upon charging the services to the grant. Identification as a repeat finding – N/A Recommendation – Contracts directly charged to a federal award should be reviewed to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions – Responsible Official: Aaron Davis, VP & Chief Experience Officer Planned Corrective Actions: The contract in question was for a vendor (Healthsource Solutions) already under contract with Lubbock County Hospital District dba University Medical Center prior to the grant application. The vendor in question had been used since at least 2010, with the most recent contract for the current wellness portal (Wellness +) beginning in 2017. Because of the success of the wellness portal and established relationship with the vendor, University Medical Center included expansion of existing platforms and additional services provided by Healthsource Solutions as a large component of the Methodology/Approach in the proposed activities of the grant narrative submitted. Use of this vendor and its applications were specifically outlined in the grant project narrative and a critical component of meeting grant objectives. University Medical Center follows the Lubbock County Purchasing Guidelines, which conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. University Medical Center has reviewed the specified requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Guidance for procurement standards, specifically related to noncompetitive procurement and concurs that formal procurement methods were not used for expansion of new services with this existing vendor or adequate documentation was provided for noncompetitive procurement. In order to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance, the University Medical Center will provide training to existing grant Program Managers on Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Additionally, if a new grant is being pursued the grant committee should receive training on Uniform Guidance procurement standards before completing grant applications. On existing or future grants, any potential contracts or purchases over $75,000 should be reviewed by the grant Program Manager (or Grant Committee lead if a Program Manager has yet been assigned) to ensure all procurement guidelines are followed and sufficient documentation is obtained prior to purchase or contract execution. The corrective actions will be immediately implemented at the District.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): FY 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The County received a total COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) allocation of $73,674,384 and chose to calculate its own revenue loss allowance, which totaled $35,932,557, to use for government services. Some SLFRF program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the revenue loss eligible use category. Additional program funds expended in 2023 were expended under the other eligible use categories. Procurement Federal regulations allow for informal procurement methods when the value of the procurement for property or services does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, which is set at $250,000 unless a lower, more restrictive threshold is set by a non-federal entity. As Indiana Code has set a more restrictive threshold of $150,000, informal procurement methods are permitted when the value of the procurement does not exceed $150,000. This informal process allows for methods other than the formal bid process. The informal process is divided between two methods based on thresholds. Micro-purchases, typically for those purchases $10,000 or under, and small purchase procedures for those purchases above the micro-purchase threshold, but below the simplified acquisition threshold. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive price rate quotations. If small purchase procedures are used, then price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. For funds expended under the revenue loss eligible use category, the above listed procurement requirements do not apply. During the audit period, the County had four vendors with purchases over the $10,000 micropurchase threshold which were expended under an eligible use category other than revenue loss and, as such, were considered small purchase procurements. The County did not provide competitive price quotations for the small purchase procurements for three of the four vendors, which totaled $257,038. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System, collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. During the engagement, an employee of the Board of County Commissioners stated that verification was completed by checking the Excluded Parties List System when covered transactions were entered into by the County to verify that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded or disqualified from participating in federal assistance programs or activities. Six covered transactions, totaling $3,952,203, were paid from SLFRF funds to six different vendors for goods or services that equaled or exceeded $25,000 during the audit period. Three of the six covered transactions were selected for testing. For all three transactions tested, documentation was not provided that the vendor's suspension and debarment status was verified. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 31 CFR 19.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.318 states in part: "(a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. . . . (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. . . ." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases — (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . . Cause The County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had properly procured services. In addition, the County was unable to provide documentation to demonstrate it had checked the Excluded Parties List System, per the County's procedures, to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into covered transactions that exceeded $25,000. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot demonstrate it obtained an adequate number of price or rate quotations prior to selecting a vendor. Therefore, the County could have overpaid for the services obtained. Furthermore, without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the County cannot ensure the vendors paid with federal funds are eligible to participate in federal programs. Any program funds the County used to pay vendors that have been suspended or debarred would be unallowable, and the funding agency could potentially recover them. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that an adequate number of price or rate quotations are obtained for small purchase procurements. Additionally, we recommended policies and procedures be strengthened to ensure appropriate supporting documentation for federal programs is retained. Lastly, we recommended that the Board of County Commissioners strengthen the County's system of internal controls to ensure that all vendors that are paid $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs before entering into any covered transactions. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2023-005 – Internal Control Deficiency and Noncompliance Over Procurement Identification of the federal program: Federal grantor: United States Department of Health and Human Services Assistance listing no.: 93.048 Program name: Special Programs for the Aging, Title IV, and Title II, Discretionary Projects Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory, or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ‘Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government’ issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework,’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.318(i) – General procurement standards states: “The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price.” Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart D, 200.320 – Methods of procurement to be followed states: ”The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurements procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award: (a) (2) Small purchases – (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity; (b) Formal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal financial assistance award exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, or a lower threshold established by a non-federal entity, formal procurement methods are required. Formal procurement methods require following documented procedures. Formal procurement methods also require public advertising unless a non-competitive procurement can be used in accordance with § 200.319. The following formal methods of procurement are used for procurement of property or services above the simplified acquisition threshold or a value below the simplified acquisition threshold the non-Federal entity determines appropriate: (1) Sealed bids. A procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (2) Proposals. A procurement method in which either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded.” Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Subpart C, 200.214 – Suspension and debarment states: “Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations that restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.” Condition: AdviseWell, Inc. did not have internal controls in place throughout the audit period to sufficiently document the history of procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price or sole source justification if warranted. Additionally, management did not have evidence of internal controls being in place throughout the audit period to document that vendors were not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a procurement transaction. AdviseWell, Inc. did not have or use documented procurements procedures throughout the audit period. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place throughout the audit period over the compliance requirement as stated in the criteria section above. Effect or potential effect: Procurements were not supported by effective internal controls and could potentially include unreasonable prices or missing documentation to support the procurements made. If suspension and debarment searches are not conducted, the organization could contract with vendors that are suspended or debarred. Lack of written policies and procedures is out of compliance with the federal requirements and could lead to disallowed procurements. Questioned costs: $80,082. Questioned costs were determined based on the expenditures of the procurements. Context: For five procurements selected for testing totaling $80,082 out of a total population of procurements of $145,646, required documentation was not available supporting the history of the procurement, including rationale for sole source selection. As the written procurement policy was not in place throughout the year and/or documentation of debarment searches on vendors was not maintained throughout the year, we were unable to test these controls. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding – Finding 2022-004. Recommendation: AdviseWell, Inc. should develop and implement effective internal controls throughout the audit period to ensure procurements are in accordance with the federal guidelines. AdviseWell, Inc. should search for suspension and debarment prior to entering into a procurement transaction and retain documentation that the search was conducted prior to entering into the transaction. AdviseWell, Inc. should periodically search recurring vendors for suspension and debarment and retain documentation to support that the search was conducted. View of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding. A procurement policy was established in October 2023 in accordance with the federal requirements, and documentation for each procurement was retained subsequent to October 2023. Management began retaining documentation that searches were conducted for vendors for suspension and debarment prior to entering into the procurement and on a periodic basis for recurring vendors.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Assistance Listing Numbers: 10.001, 10.200, 10.215, 10.307, 10.310, 10.311, and 10.912 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Research and Development Cluster Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Award Identification Numbers: 58-5090-2-037 2022-38624-38368 2021-38640-34714 2020-38640-31522 2022-38640-37486 2023-51300-40959 2021-68012-35917 2019-68012-29852 2020-68012-31934 2021-49400-35592 NR225F48XXXXG006 Name of Pass-through Entities and Award Periods: Michigan State University-September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025; Regents of the University of Minnesota- April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023, March 1, 2022 through February 28, 2025, and April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2025; Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System- September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2024, September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2025, and January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026 Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.318(a) requires a non-federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR section 200.318(c)(1) requires a non- federal entity to maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. 2 CFR section 200.318(i) requires a non-federal entity to maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including, but not limited to, the: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Condition: There are no documented procurement procedures that meet the requirements of 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327 that were implemented for the fiscal year. There are no consistently implemented internal controls documented to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. 19 out of 60 procurements did not have documented an internal control over compliance. 1 of 2 simplified acquisition procurements had no documentation of the rationale for the method, documentation to support a required procurement method used, contractor selections or rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices. The only support documented are the invoices. No covered transactions were documented as tested for suspension and debarment. Cause: There were no written procedures over procurement and when changes in management and accounting services occurred internal control documentation was not consistent and compliance requirements were not understood. Effect or Potential Effect: Procurement transactions may not be in compliance and disallowed. Questioned Costs: $22,000 – two simplified acquisitions Context: 60 ($76,181) out of 721 ($302,069) procurement transactions were tested. Two of the 721 procurements were simplified acquisitions while the remaining were micro purchases. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of Finding 2022-005. Recommendation: The Organization should develop and document procurement procedures that meet state, local, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Internal controls should be designed, implemented, and documented within the procurement procedures to ensure compliance with 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.327. At a minimum, the procurement history including rationale for the method, procurement method support, contract selections and rejections, suspension and debarment, and bases for contract prices should be documented. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement procedures.
Criteria: The Corporation must maintain and adhere to documented procurement procedures that must conform to the procurement standards in 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327. These sections include policies and procedures related to competition, informal and formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement. Condition: We noted that there was a lack of evidence that policies and procedures were applied as required under the noted 2 CFR Sections in “Criteria”. Cause: The Corporation did not maintain formal documentation or evidence to support that a competitive price analysis for vendors or that suspension and debarment verifications were performed for vendors, as required by the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: We were unable to determine whether charges relating to vendor services or goods charged to the Federal programs are in accordance with 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327 or 200.214. Questioned costs: None Context: The Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed for walkthrough purposes or any samples that would be selected. Additionally, per management, no written documentation can be provided for any sole source procurements. Repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from prior year. This was reported as finding 2022-010 in the 2022 report. Recommendation: We recommend the Corporation establish formal internal controls, and documentation of their performance, relating procurement, required price analysis of vendors, and suspension and debarment verifications. View of Responsible Officials: Due to turnover of several key financial executives and personnel and lack of formal documentation of current policies and procedures, the Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed as of December 31, 2023.
Criteria: The Corporation must maintain and adhere to documented procurement procedures that must conform to the procurement standards in 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327. These sections include policies and procedures related to competition, informal and formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement. Condition: We noted that there was a lack of evidence that policies and procedures were applied as required under the noted 2 CFR Sections in “Criteria”. Cause: The Corporation did not maintain formal documentation or evidence to support that a competitive price analysis for vendors or that suspension and debarment verifications were performed for vendors, as required by the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: We were unable to determine whether charges relating to vendor services or goods charged to the Federal programs are in accordance with 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327 or 200.214. Questioned costs: None Context: The Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed for walkthrough purposes or any samples that would be selected. Additionally, per management, no written documentation can be provided for any sole source procurements. Repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from prior year. This was reported as finding 2022-010 in the 2022 report. Recommendation: We recommend the Corporation establish formal internal controls, and documentation of their performance, relating procurement, required price analysis of vendors, and suspension and debarment verifications. View of Responsible Officials: Due to turnover of several key financial executives and personnel and lack of formal documentation of current policies and procedures, the Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed as of December 31, 2023.
Criteria: The Corporation must maintain and adhere to documented procurement procedures that must conform to the procurement standards in 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327. These sections include policies and procedures related to competition, informal and formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement. Condition: We noted that there was a lack of evidence that policies and procedures were applied as required under the noted 2 CFR Sections in “Criteria”. Cause: The Corporation did not maintain formal documentation or evidence to support that a competitive price analysis for vendors or that suspension and debarment verifications were performed for vendors, as required by the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: We were unable to determine whether charges relating to vendor services or goods charged to the Federal programs are in accordance with 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327 or 200.214. Questioned costs: None Context: The Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed for walkthrough purposes or any samples that would be selected. Additionally, per management, no written documentation can be provided for any sole source procurements. Repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from prior year. This was reported as finding 2022-010 in the 2022 report. Recommendation: We recommend the Corporation establish formal internal controls, and documentation of their performance, relating procurement, required price analysis of vendors, and suspension and debarment verifications. View of Responsible Officials: Due to turnover of several key financial executives and personnel and lack of formal documentation of current policies and procedures, the Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed as of December 31, 2023.
Criteria: The Corporation must maintain and adhere to documented procurement procedures that must conform to the procurement standards in 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327. These sections include policies and procedures related to competition, informal and formal procurement methods and noncompetitive procurement. Condition: We noted that there was a lack of evidence that policies and procedures were applied as required under the noted 2 CFR Sections in “Criteria”. Cause: The Corporation did not maintain formal documentation or evidence to support that a competitive price analysis for vendors or that suspension and debarment verifications were performed for vendors, as required by the general procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: We were unable to determine whether charges relating to vendor services or goods charged to the Federal programs are in accordance with 2 CFR Sections 200.317 through 200.327 or 200.214. Questioned costs: None Context: The Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed for walkthrough purposes or any samples that would be selected. Additionally, per management, no written documentation can be provided for any sole source procurements. Repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from prior year. This was reported as finding 2022-010 in the 2022 report. Recommendation: We recommend the Corporation establish formal internal controls, and documentation of their performance, relating procurement, required price analysis of vendors, and suspension and debarment verifications. View of Responsible Officials: Due to turnover of several key financial executives and personnel and lack of formal documentation of current policies and procedures, the Corporation was unable to provide evidence of procurement, suspension or debarment verification performed as of December 31, 2023.
Criteria An entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in CFR 200.317 through 200.327. Condition The Program made two large purchases using grant funds exceeding the micro-purchase threshold without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause The Program was not fully educated on procurement policies when it came to grant funds, so they were not aware that bids or price comparisons were necessary for the purchases. Effect Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in cost with other vendors. Recommendation We recommend management adhere to the Federal, State, and local regulations for all procurements using Federally sourced funds. Management's Response Management agrees with our recommendation and finding and will work to adhere to all applicable procurement policies.
U.S. Department of Treasury COVID 19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - 21.027 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement and Significant Deficiency In accordance with 2 CFR 200.318, recipients and subrecipients must maintain and use documented procedures for procurement transactions under a Federal award or subaward, including acquisition of property and services. These documented procurement procedures must be consistent with State, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. Condition: During our test work over the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery grant, we noted the Unified Government did not perform procurement procedures on one of its vendor contracts. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context: For 21.027, there were 29 vendors receiving a total of $1,789,214 subject to procurement requirements. Of those 29, a sample of eight vendors receiving a total of $470,106 were selected for testing. One of the eight vendors selected for testing did not undergo the Unified Government's formal procurement procedures. However, the vendor did undergo proper suspension and debarment checks and no issues were identified during this check. The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Prior Year Finding: N/A Effect: Federal funds could be paid to entities outside of the Unified Government's procurement policy. Cause: The vendor identified was granted a non-competitive procurement under national emergency conditions due to the effects of COVID-19. However, the vendor was utilized again after the national emergency period and the Unified Government's procurement policy should have been followed at this time, but was not. Recommendation: We recommend that the Unified Government communicate to all departments that purchases using federal funds follow the procurement policy procedures prior to purchase and the procurement department provide training on the requirements to properly document that the procedures are completed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions: Departments have been informed of the procurement requirements and the procurement policy will be adhered to on a go forward basis.
2023-015 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The Organization was unable to demonstrate consistent controls over the procurement requirement. Criteria: The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The requirements that apply to procurement under cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR are contained in 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44 and the clauses at 48 CFR sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203- 16, and 52.215-12; agency FAR Supplements; and the terms and conditions of the contract. Questioned Costs There is no questioned cost. Cause: The Organization did not have sufficient controls to ensure that the procurement requirement was met due to staff turnover. Effect: The Organization could have expenditures that were paid that did not meet its own procurement policy. Perspective: Thirty-one of the forty items selected for testing did not have documentation of the control over compliance with the procurement and suspension and debartment requirement. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. See finding 2022-018. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurences of this deficiency, we recommend that management expand controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Auditee Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2023-015 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The Organization was unable to demonstrate consistent controls over the procurement requirement. Criteria: The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The requirements that apply to procurement under cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR are contained in 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44 and the clauses at 48 CFR sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203- 16, and 52.215-12; agency FAR Supplements; and the terms and conditions of the contract. Questioned Costs There is no questioned cost. Cause: The Organization did not have sufficient controls to ensure that the procurement requirement was met due to staff turnover. Effect: The Organization could have expenditures that were paid that did not meet its own procurement policy. Perspective: Thirty-one of the forty items selected for testing did not have documentation of the control over compliance with the procurement and suspension and debartment requirement. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. See finding 2022-018. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurences of this deficiency, we recommend that management expand controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Auditee Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
2023-015 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The Organization was unable to demonstrate consistent controls over the procurement requirement. Criteria: The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The requirements that apply to procurement under cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR are contained in 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44 and the clauses at 48 CFR sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203- 16, and 52.215-12; agency FAR Supplements; and the terms and conditions of the contract. Questioned Costs There is no questioned cost. Cause: The Organization did not have sufficient controls to ensure that the procurement requirement was met due to staff turnover. Effect: The Organization could have expenditures that were paid that did not meet its own procurement policy. Perspective: Thirty-one of the forty items selected for testing did not have documentation of the control over compliance with the procurement and suspension and debartment requirement. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. See finding 2022-018. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurences of this deficiency, we recommend that management expand controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Auditee Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
Finding 2023-007 Failure to Create and Implement a Suitable Procurement Policy Type of Finding: Noncompliance and Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Context: The Organization created and implemented a procurement policy to govern its federal expenditures. The procurement policy implemented by the Organization failed to include several key elements, including clearly establishing and governing the various expenditure purchasing thresholds, documenting a sufficient bid process for competitive bid proposals, and standards of conduct covering conflict of interest for employees involved in the bid evaluation process. Further, while the policy was in place, the Organization failed to implement the elements of the policy into its procurement process. As part of audit procedures, 12 transactions were included in the testing population and all 12 were tested. Of the testing group, the auditor identified 4 transactions that required competitive bid procedures for which the Organization failed to conduct. The Organization also failed to document its rationale to limit competition for all items tested. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires organizations that receive federal funds to establish and maintain effective internal controls, including a documented procurement policy. A procurement policy outlines the procedures, thresholds, and guidelines for acquiring goods and services, ensuring transparency, competition, and cost-effectiveness while preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. Procurement policies must include relevant elements detailed in 2 CFR §200.317 - §200.327. The Organization is required to implement the procurement policy in its procedures and to develop internal controls to ensure its effectiveness. Cause: The Organization had not recognized the significance of a well-structured procurement policy in safeguarding federal funds and ensuring compliance. This lack of awareness led to inadequate attention being given to the establishment of such a policy. Once created, leadership failed to identify an effective implementation strategy to ensure compliance. These issues were exacerbated by a failure to maintain appropriate documentation and to have sufficient internal controls over the procurement process. Effect: The absence of a documented procurement policy exposes the Organization to several risks and potential consequences. Without established guidelines, there is a higher likelihood of inconsistent procurement practices, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. The absence of a defined procurement process could result in a lack of transparency and accountability in vendor selection and contract award decisions. Failure to have necessary safeguards in standards of conduct over employee actions could result in unreported conflicts of interest or inappropriate actions taking in award decisions. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs of $24,645 were identified. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization review their procurement policy in line with Uniform Guidance standards and update the policy to include the missing elements. The Organization should also identify an effective implementation plan to ensure that the procedures over procurement include the elements detailed in its procurement policy. Finally, it is recommended that the Organization implement an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the Organization's procurements are compliant with federal requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization retained a licensed CPA firm with significant expertise in financial reporting and single audit compliance. The Organization will revise and implement a formal Procurement Policy that fully aligns with Uniform Guidance and federal regulations and conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in the procurement process.
U.S. Department of Treasury passed through State of Utah Department of Workforce Services and through Colorado Department of Human Services 2023-002 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (Assistance Listing Number): Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria - Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). Context and Condition - We selected five contracts to test for compliance with procurement standards. Records for one contract lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause - The Academy did not follow its procurement policy for publicly soliciting bids. Effect - A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs - No costs were questioned. Recommendation - We recommend the Academy ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials - The Academy will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Procurement Policies and Procedures Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: ISA-ARPA-ADWR-123022-01 - 2023 Pass-Through Agency: State of Arizona Governor’s Office Pass-Through Number(s): ERMT-20-002 Award Period: January 1, 2023 through January 1, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200, Uniform Administrative requires certain elements to be part of the District’s procurement standards. The general procurement standards require the District to have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in § 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. The details of this requirements can be found in Title 2, Part 200, CFR Section 318(a). Condition: During our testing, we noted the District did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure procurement procedures that conform to Uniform Guidance were followed, or designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the District was not following their federal procurement policy #2023-05 to ensure compliance with CFR, Subtitle A Chapter II, Part 200, Subparts D and E when entering into vendor contracts. Also noted the District was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: The District does not have effective internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance procurement rules and procedures. Effect: The lack of internal controls over the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: Repeat of prior year finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine compliance with the Uniform Guidance procurement rules and procedures. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding, and as reported in the corrective action plan, District policies will be updated and approved to conform to federal guidance.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement Policy and Related Contract Program: 66.958 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Award No: WIFIA-N18147WI Award Year: 2023 This finding is a repeat finding of 2022-001 Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318 - General Procurement Standards, requires non-Federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: We reviewed the water utility's procurement policy and service contracts with costs reimbursed during 2023, noting they did not contain necessary federal language related to conflicts of interest and debarment and suspension. Cause: The water utility has not received federal funding in the past and did not update their procurement policy when they sought federal funding for the Great Lakes Water Supply project. Additionally, service contracts were entered into prior to receiving federal funds. Effect: Without adequate control of contract language the water utility could enter into contracts related to the Great Lakes Water Supply project that do not qualify for federal reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend the water utility review its procurement policy and make necessary updates to be in compliance with federal standards. Additionally, we recommend the utility enter into contract addendums related to contracts previously executed without required federal language. Management Response: Waukesha Water utility management has worked closely with WIFIA to craft contracts that include all necessary language prior to releasing RFPs for construction contracts. WIFIA was presented all service contracts to review prior to reimbursements received in fiscal year 2023. The finance department is working to update the procurement policy to ensure necessary federal language is included. The finance department will also work with service contractors to execute contract addendums.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listings Number: 66.468 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): DW23150901 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the City to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement - Policy The City had not established a purchasing policy that reflected applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Additionally, the City did not maintain a policy that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in evaluation of bids or proposals. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement - Small Purchases The City expended federal funds to pay 12 separate vendors to provide goods and services for the duration of the City's Lead Service Line Replacement project. A population of 5 vendors had aggregated expenditures for the audit period that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. All 5 vendors were tested; for 2 of the 5 vendors, the City was unable to provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurement provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with award funds, recipients are required to verify that vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the agreement with the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA), the City was not required to perform testing over suspension and debarment for a majority of the vendors used; however, several drawdowns from the State Revolving Funds (SRF) program were used to reimburse the City for payments made to specific vendors. The vendors paid directly by the City were not included in the IFA's procedures for checking suspension and debarment, therefore, the City was obligated to meet the requirement. The City did not maintain a set of procedures for checking suspension and debarment status of vendors for expenditures related to the SRF awards. A total of two vendors paid directly by the City exceeded the suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000 and were subject to testing. No documentation to show that suspension and debarment was verified prior to entering into the contract could be provided for either vendor. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318(d) states: "The non-Federal entity's procedures must avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. Where appropriate, an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives, and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical approach." 2 CFR 200.319(c) states: "The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to compete for the contract." 2 CFR 200.319(d) states: "The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a 'brand name or equivalent' description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and (2) Identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals." Cause The City did not maintain a procurement policy that would demonstrate the appropriate procedures to be followed when procuring with federal funding and were not aware of the need to follow federal guidelines for procurement or suspension and debarment for expenditures associated with the SRF awards. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, noncompliance remained undetected. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Without following the required methods for procurement, the City could be overpaying for services or providing federal funds to an entity that is suspended or debarred. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the City. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award and ensure that vendors paid from federal funds are neither suspended nor debarred. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Federal agency name: U.S. National Science Foundation & U.S. Department of Commerce Federal program title: Geosciences, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Office of International Science and Engineering & NOAA – Cooperative Institute AL No.: 47.050, 47.070, 47.079 & 11.432 Federal Award Identification No. & Award Period: EAR-1849458 (06/01/2019 -05/31/2024), EAR-2012893 (10/01/2020 – 08/31/2025), OAC-1931278 (10/1/2019 – 09/30/2023), EAR- 2244446 (03/01/2023 – 02/28/2026), OAC-2209833 (01/01/2023 – 12/31/2026), OAC-1829744 (09/01/2018 – 08/31/2023), OAC-1835592 (01/01/2009 – 12/31/2022), OAC-1835818 (10/01/2018 – 09/30/2024), OAC-2103780 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OAC-2118329 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OISE-1855654 (05/15/2019 – 12/31/2023) & A22NWS4320003 (08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 04/01/2023 – 03/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2026, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025) Pass Through Entity: University of Alabama MW2023-002 PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Material Weakness Criteria The requirements for this compliance requirement are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317- 200.326; 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44, and the clauses at 48 CRF sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203-16 and 52.215-12; agency FAR supplements; 2 CFR part 180; OMB M-18- 18; and the terms and conditions of the federal award. There is a requirement to verify that contractors in covered transactions or any of its vendors are not federally debarred, suspended, or excluded. A covered transaction is a nonprocurement or procurement transaction in excess of $25,000 that is subject to the prohibitions noted in 2 CFR part 180. The covered transaction may be at the primary tier, between a federal agency and a person or a lower tier between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Condition CUAHSI failed to maintain and provide the proper records and support to document their review of vendor files for covered transactions. Such failure led to non-compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment policies in accordance with the UG for the year ended December 31, 2023. CUAHSI did not complete the verification of its 2023 vendors until 2024. Based on our testing, no contractors in covered transactions were deemed to be federally debarred, suspended or excluded. Cause & Context CUAHSI has a policy in place to meet the procurement requirements but there was no evidence of compliance with that policy. Effect As a result of noncompliance, there could be possible repayment of funds and / or possible suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs None Prior Year Audit Finding Yes, previously reported as MW2022-006. Recommendation CUAHSI should ensure that, to the extent practicable, the use of a competitive procurement process in compliance with 2 CFR section 200/317. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action See accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Contract #65873, SLT-3157 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Natural Resources Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement The County did adopt an applicable federal purchasing policy. The Lake County Indiana Purchasing Manual for Supplies, Services and Public Works states on page 19 that "Federal funds more than $50,000 but less than $150,000 will invite 3 quotes at an open public meeting . . .", which is the federal requirement for small purchases. However, the County did not follow this policy. In 2023, the County had one vendor that was paid a total of $97,525 from COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) under Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. However, the County did not obtain price or rate quotes for the one applicable vendor under the small purchase threshold as required. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The County did not have policies or procedures in place related to the suspension and debarment requirements for the SLFRF funds. Two covered transactions totaling $1,990,616 paid from SLFRF funds were identified. Documentation to show that suspension and debarment was verified prior to entering into contracts with these two vendors could not be provided by the County. The amounts for which suspension and debarment were not verified for Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and the SLT-3157 directly from the Department of the Treasury were $176,711 and $1,813,905, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the transactions identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. (a) Informal Procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County's purchasing policy does not provide procedures on how the County will ensure the appropriate number of quotes will be obtained for small purchases or how the County will ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements. Effect Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the repayment or loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the County should develop procedures to ensure the appropriate procurement methods are used for items or services procured that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred when expending federal funds. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
The City did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected, make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure, provide emergency relief from natural disasters or their negative economic impacts, fund projects eligible under certain programs administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation through three pathways and fund projects eligible under the programs established in Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. In 2023, the City spent $388,125 in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish, document and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration's System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract, and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays $25,000 or more using federal funds, our audit found the City did not follow this process and did not verify the one contractor we tested was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract with them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition City staff were aware of the federal suspension and debarment verification requirements and normally verify that the requirements are met during the procurement process. However, the City experienced turnover in the position responsible for documenting the verification. Current City staff were unable to find documentation showing evidence that they verified the contractor’s suspension and debarment status. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain a written certification from the contractor, insert a clause into the contract or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractor it paid $56,217 using federal funds was not suspended or debarred before contracting with or purchasing from them. Without adequate internal controls, the City increases its risk of awarding federal funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the City made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the awarding agency could potentially recover them. We subsequently verified the contractor was not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs and maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this requirement. City’s Response The City of North Bend acknowledges that a contract utilizing SLFRF funds, and awarded to a software vendor, did not include within the contract a required self-attestation concerning Suspensions and Debarments. The self-attestation was used in lieu of a documented review of the SAM.gov portal for suspensions and debarments. This was an oversight of contract review process. Other contracts issued during the same period included self-attestation language from 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. In 2024 and 2025, the Public Works Deputy Director, Contract Specialist, and Capital Staff Accountant ensure adherence to all applicable local, state, and federal procurement laws and regulations as provided in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.214, 2 CFR Part 180, and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR part 19, prohibiting recipients from entering into contracts with suspended or debarred parties. The City of North Bend understands the significance of the finding and immediately took steps to review all subsequent contracts for compliance. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the City for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it has taken to address the concern. We will review the status of the City’s corrective action during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations, implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (Eviction Rental Assistance Program 2.0) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP0002 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Washington State Department of Commerce Pass-Through Number(s): 21-4619C-104 Award Period: 10/1/2021 - 6/30/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Uniform Guidance requires non‑Federal entities to use documented procurement procedures consistent with applicable federal standards (2 CFR §§200.317–200.327). In addition, Uniform Guidance requires non‑Federal entities to maintain written standards of conduct governing conflicts of interest and organizational conflicts of interest for employees, officers, and agents engaged in the selection, award, and administration of federal awards (2 CFR §200.318(c)(1)). Condition: The auditee did not have a written procurement policy or a written conflict of interest policy in place during the audit period. As a result, the auditee did not have formal, documented procedures to govern procurement activities or to address potential conflicts of interest related to the administration of federal awards. Context: Procurement and conflict of interest are required compliance areas to be evaluated under the OMB Compliance Supplement for the Single Audit. As part of obtaining an understanding of internal control over compliance, the auditors evaluated whether the auditee had established the required written procurement procedures and standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest. During this evaluation, it was noted that the auditee did not have a written procurement policy or a written conflict of interest policy in place during the audit period. Cause: The auditee has not formally documented or adopted procurement and conflict of interest policies as required by Uniform Guidance. While management performs certain procurement and oversight activities informally, these practices have not been codified into written policies to ensure consistent application and compliance with federal requirements. Effect: The absence of formal procurement and conflict of interest policies increases the risk that procurement activities may not be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements and that actual or perceived conflicts of interest may not be appropriately identified, disclosed, or mitigated. Without documented policies, the auditee is at increased risk of noncompliance with federal award requirements related to procurement standards and ethical conduct. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop, adopt, and implement written procurement and conflict of interest policies that comply with Uniform Guidance requirements. These policies should address procurement standards, including methods of procurement and oversight, and establish standards of conduct governing conflicts of interest for employees, officers, and agents involved in the administration of federal awards. Management should also ensure that these policies are communicated to relevant personnel and applied consistently. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a Corrective Action Plan.
MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2023-001 – Procurement Federal Program Information: US Department of Treasury: ALN - 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR 200.317-327, 2 CFR section 200.314, 2 CFR 200 Appendix II. Condition: During audit procedures, it was identified that the County’s policies did not include all the required procurement clauses. The procurement history files did not include contracts, or documentation containing the required provisions, methods of procurement. Cause: The Unit does not have the necessary understanding of the requirement to be able to understand the necessary internal controls over compliance. Effect: The County did not include all requirements when it updated its policies to include required micro and small purchase requirements. This increases the likelihood of missing required provisions and documentation. Increasing the likelihood of restricted or loss of federal funds. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: Four of the Eight Procurements for the County of Aroostook were tested. Three were missing were missing contracts or other required provision documentation. The procurement policy is missing the provision to consider responsible contractors, Prohibit use of geographical preferences, clear and accurate descriptions if technical requirements in the solicitations,and affirmative steps to in contracting with small and minority businesses. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2022-001. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Unit implement internal control processes and procedures to ensure that federal reimbursements requests are submitted on a timely basis. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the County of Aroostook.
Finding 2023-006: 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds:COVID-19 - Material Weakness Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Under 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, specifically 2 CFR §§200.317–200.327 (Procurement Standards), non-Federal entities must follow established procurement procedures when purchasing goods and services under a Federal award. These standards require organizations to maintain written procurement procedures, conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, and maintain documentation supporting the procurement method, contractor selection, and basis for price determination. Condition: During testing, we noted that the Organization entered into a contractor agreement to provide services under the Federal pass-through program; however, the Organization did not follow the procurement standards required under Uniform Guidance. Specifically: • The Organization did not document that competitive procurement procedures were performed prior to selecting the contractor. • There was no evidence that multiple bids or proposals were solicited or evaluated, or that a justification for noncompetitive procurement was prepared and approved. • Documentation supporting the basis for vendor selection and price reasonableness was not maintained. Effect: Failure to follow required procurement standards limits assurance that the Organization obtained goods and services through full and open competition and at a reasonable cost. This increases the risk that Federal funds may not be used in the most efficient and cost-effective manner and may result in noncompliance with Federal award requirements. Questioned Cost: None. Cause: The Organization does not have sufficient policies, procedures, or internal controls in place to ensure that procurement transactions funded with Federal awards comply with Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Additionally, staff responsible for contracting decisions were not fully aware of Federal procurement requirements. Pass-Through Entity Monitoring Results: The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE), the pass-through entity, issued a Financial Desk Review in April 2023 covering the period from December 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022. The desk review identified deficiencies related to the Organization's procurement practices and required corrective action to strengthen compliance with the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Based on our audit procedures, we identified procurement compliance deficiencies similar to those identified during the CDLE desk review. This information is provided as relevant background regarding the significance of the compliance deficiencies identified during our audit and is not intended to indicate the existence of a prior-year audit finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization strengthen internal controls over procurement related to Federal awards by: • Developing and implementing written procurement policies and procedures that align with 2 CFR §§200.317–200.327. • Ensuring that procurement transactions include documentation of the procurement method used, vendor selection process, and price or cost analysis when required. • Maintaining documentation to demonstrate full and open competition, or a properly approved sole-source justification when noncompetitive procurement is used. • Providing training to staff responsible for procurement and contracting on Federal procurement requirements. • Implementing a review process prior to executing vendor agreements funded with Federal awards. Response: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. In fact, ActivateWork worked towards developing and implementing enhancements to its procurement process as suggested by the CDLE Financial Desk Review, from the date ActivateWork received it and throughout the remainder of the year, including revisions to policies, procedures, and oversight activities.
2023-006 – WRITTEN PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DO NOT CONFORM TO THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE PROCUREMENT STANDARDS Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 17.258 and 17.278 – WIOA Adult & Dislocated Worker Grant Cluster. Federal awarding agency: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. Pass-through entity: Eastern Kentucky Concentrated Employment Program, Inc. and Kentucky Education and Labor Cabinet. Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance; Allowable Costs. Repeat finding – reported in the prior year as finding 2022-005. Criteria: Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.318 requires non-Federal entities to maintain and use documented procurement procedures that are consistent with applicable state and local laws and regulations and conform to Federal procurement standards. Written policies should address matters including conflicts of interest, methods of procurement, contractor oversight, and full and open competition. Condition: During our review of procurement policies and procedures, we noted that the Institute had not adopted written procurement policies and procedures that conform to the procurement requirements of Uniform Guidance. Specifically, the Institute's policies did not adequately address the Federal procurement standards contained in 2 CFR Part 200. Cause: The Institute has not completed the revision of its written procurement policies and procedures to conform to the Uniform Guidance, and personnel responsible for grant administration have not been trained on the Uniform Guidance procurement standards. Effect: Without conforming written procurement policies, the Institute may not consistently apply Federal procurement requirements when expending Federal funds. This increases the risk of noncompliance and the use of procurement methods that do not meet Federal requirements. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that management adopt and implement written procurement policies and procedures that comply with 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. The policies should address procurement methods, conflicts of interest, contractor selection, suspension and debarment, required cost or price analyses, contractor oversight, full and open competition, and documentation of procurement decisions. Management's Views and Response: The Institute will adopt written procurement policies and procedures that conform to the Uniform Guidance procurement standards, present them to the Board of Directors for approval, and train the personnel responsible for procurement on their use.
Criteria: an entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Center maintans specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, they have inconsistently or inadequately been using those manuals and guidelines. The Center made two large purchases under the Head Start grant exceeding micro-purchase thresholds without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Thresholds are often considered based on unit price instead of the aggregate purchase amount based on certain grantor requirements to obtain written approval for purchases based on unit price. In addition, procedures are considered unnecessary by management for purchases falling within the grantor approved budget amounts. Effect: Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in costs with other vendors. Recommendation: We recommend management assess and adhere to the internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds.