Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Program: Continuum of Care, Emergency Solutions Grant Program Federal Financial Assistance Listing No.:14.267, 14.231 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through: Sacramento Steps Forward, Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance Award Year: 2023 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Grant Award Number: CA0955L9T032108, CA0955L9T032209, CA0143L9T032114, CA0143L9T032215, CA1303L9T032107, CA1303L9T032208, DHA-NM-03-23, DHA-NM-03-24 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award. The nonfederal entity’s documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327. 2 CFR 200 Appendix II requires certain provisions be included in contracts if criteria are met. As outlined in 2 CFR 180, recipients must not utilize any contractor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. Condition Found: The Organization’s procurement policy did not include all the required elements as outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the Organization did not retain documentation to support the procedures performed to ensure compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Cause: The Organization does not typically receive federal financial assistance that is subject to procurement and suspension and debarment regulations; consequently, certain elements required by the Uniform Guidance were missing. Effect: Lack of complete procurement, suspension, and debarment policies and not retaining documentation to support compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No questioned costs were identified as a result of our procedures. Context/ Sampling: Suspension and debarment was applicable to 9 contractors totaling $1,989,106 under the Continuum of Care Program and three contractors totaling $227,772 under the Emergency Solutions Grant Program. We tested all contractors with total payments exceeding $25,000 during the year. Repeat Finding from Prior Years: Yes, Finding 2022-03. Recommendation: We recommend that management develop a written procurement policy that conforms with Uniform Guidance. In addition, we recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to retain documentation supporting compliance with major federal program compliance requirements regarding suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees. See separately issued Corrective Action Plan.
Procurement Policies and Procedures Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: ISA-ARPA-ADWR-123022-01 - 2023 Pass-Through Agency: State of Arizona Governor’s Office Pass-Through Number(s): ERMT-20-002 Award Period: January 1, 2023 through January 1, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200, Uniform Administrative requires certain elements to be part of the District’s procurement standards. The general procurement standards require the District to have and use documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in § 200.317 through 200.327 of the Uniform Guidance. The details of this requirements can be found in Title 2, Part 200, CFR Section 318(a). Condition: During our testing, we noted the District did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure procurement procedures that conform to Uniform Guidance were followed, or designed to ensure vendors were not suspended or debarred. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the District was not following their federal procurement policy #2023-05 to ensure compliance with CFR, Subtitle A Chapter II, Part 200, Subparts D and E when entering into vendor contracts. Also noted the District was not reviewing vendors prior to entering into a contract to ensure the vendor was not on the suspended or debarred vendor list maintained by the General Services Administration. Cause: The District does not have effective internal controls in place to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance procurement rules and procedures. Effect: The lack of internal controls over the provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: Repeat of prior year finding 2022-001. Recommendation: We recommend the District design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review potential contractors to determine compliance with the Uniform Guidance procurement rules and procedures. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management concurs with the finding, and as reported in the corrective action plan, District policies will be updated and approved to conform to federal guidance.
Finding 2023-001: Procurement Policy and Related Contract Program: 66.958 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Federal Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Award No: WIFIA-N18147WI Award Year: 2023 This finding is a repeat finding of 2022-001 Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.318 - General Procurement Standards, requires non-Federal entities to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: We reviewed the water utility's procurement policy and service contracts with costs reimbursed during 2023, noting they did not contain necessary federal language related to conflicts of interest and debarment and suspension. Cause: The water utility has not received federal funding in the past and did not update their procurement policy when they sought federal funding for the Great Lakes Water Supply project. Additionally, service contracts were entered into prior to receiving federal funds. Effect: Without adequate control of contract language the water utility could enter into contracts related to the Great Lakes Water Supply project that do not qualify for federal reimbursement. Questioned Costs: None noted. Recommendation: We recommend the water utility review its procurement policy and make necessary updates to be in compliance with federal standards. Additionally, we recommend the utility enter into contract addendums related to contracts previously executed without required federal language. Management Response: Waukesha Water utility management has worked closely with WIFIA to craft contracts that include all necessary language prior to releasing RFPs for construction contracts. WIFIA was presented all service contracts to review prior to reimbursements received in fiscal year 2023. The finance department is working to update the procurement policy to ensure necessary federal language is included. The finance department will also work with service contractors to execute contract addendums.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Cluster - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Assistance Listings Number: 66.468 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): DW23150901 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context An effective internal control system was not designed or implemented at the City to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Procurement - Policy The City had not established a purchasing policy that reflected applicable state laws and regulations, including procedures to avoid the acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items and procedures to ensure that all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Additionally, the City did not maintain a policy that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in evaluation of bids or proposals. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Procurement - Small Purchases The City expended federal funds to pay 12 separate vendors to provide goods and services for the duration of the City's Lead Service Line Replacement project. A population of 5 vendors had aggregated expenditures for the audit period that were less than the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 but exceeded the $10,000 micro-purchase threshold. All 5 vendors were tested; for 2 of the 5 vendors, the City was unable to provide any documentation that the procurement method used was appropriate or that the procurement provided full and open competition or rationale to support the determination to limit competition. The history of the procurement, including rationale for the method of procurement, selection of the vendor, and the basis for the price, was not adequately documented. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with award funds, recipients are required to verify that vendors are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Due to the agreement with the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA), the City was not required to perform testing over suspension and debarment for a majority of the vendors used; however, several drawdowns from the State Revolving Funds (SRF) program were used to reimburse the City for payments made to specific vendors. The vendors paid directly by the City were not included in the IFA's procedures for checking suspension and debarment, therefore, the City was obligated to meet the requirement. The City did not maintain a set of procedures for checking suspension and debarment status of vendors for expenditures related to the SRF awards. A total of two vendors paid directly by the City exceeded the suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000 and were subject to testing. No documentation to show that suspension and debarment was verified prior to entering into the contract could be provided for either vendor. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. (a) Informal procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases– (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." 2 CFR 200.214 states: "Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The nonfederal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.318(d) states: "The non-Federal entity's procedures must avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. Where appropriate, an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives, and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical approach." 2 CFR 200.319(c) states: "The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to compete for the contract." 2 CFR 200.319(d) states: "The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a 'brand name or equivalent' description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and (2) Identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals." Cause The City did not maintain a procurement policy that would demonstrate the appropriate procedures to be followed when procuring with federal funding and were not aware of the need to follow federal guidelines for procurement or suspension and debarment for expenditures associated with the SRF awards. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, noncompliance remained undetected. As a result, proper procurement procedures were not adhered to for all vendors. Without following the required methods for procurement, the City could be overpaying for services or providing federal funds to an entity that is suspended or debarred. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the City. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 CITY OF LOGANSPORT SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls to ensure expenditures made from federal awards use the appropriate procurement method and retain the documentation to support the procurement methods used in order to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award and ensure that vendors paid from federal funds are neither suspended nor debarred. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Federal agency name: U.S. National Science Foundation & U.S. Department of Commerce Federal program title: Geosciences, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Office of International Science and Engineering & NOAA – Cooperative Institute AL No.: 47.050, 47.070, 47.079 & 11.432 Federal Award Identification No. & Award Period: EAR-1849458 (06/01/2019 -05/31/2024), EAR-2012893 (10/01/2020 – 08/31/2025), OAC-1931278 (10/1/2019 – 09/30/2023), EAR- 2244446 (03/01/2023 – 02/28/2026), OAC-2209833 (01/01/2023 – 12/31/2026), OAC-1829744 (09/01/2018 – 08/31/2023), OAC-1835592 (01/01/2009 – 12/31/2022), OAC-1835818 (10/01/2018 – 09/30/2024), OAC-2103780 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OAC-2118329 (10/01/2021 – 09/30/2026), OISE-1855654 (05/15/2019 – 12/31/2023) & A22NWS4320003 (08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 08/01/2022 – 07/25/2025, 04/01/2023 – 03/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2024, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2026, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025, 06/01/2023 – 05/31/2025) Pass Through Entity: University of Alabama MW2023-002 PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT Material Weakness Criteria The requirements for this compliance requirement are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317- 200.326; 48 CFR parts 03, 15, 44, and the clauses at 48 CRF sections 52.244-2, 52.244-5, 52.203-13, 52.203-16 and 52.215-12; agency FAR supplements; 2 CFR part 180; OMB M-18- 18; and the terms and conditions of the federal award. There is a requirement to verify that contractors in covered transactions or any of its vendors are not federally debarred, suspended, or excluded. A covered transaction is a nonprocurement or procurement transaction in excess of $25,000 that is subject to the prohibitions noted in 2 CFR part 180. The covered transaction may be at the primary tier, between a federal agency and a person or a lower tier between a participant in a covered transaction and another person. Condition CUAHSI failed to maintain and provide the proper records and support to document their review of vendor files for covered transactions. Such failure led to non-compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment policies in accordance with the UG for the year ended December 31, 2023. CUAHSI did not complete the verification of its 2023 vendors until 2024. Based on our testing, no contractors in covered transactions were deemed to be federally debarred, suspended or excluded. Cause & Context CUAHSI has a policy in place to meet the procurement requirements but there was no evidence of compliance with that policy. Effect As a result of noncompliance, there could be possible repayment of funds and / or possible suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs None Prior Year Audit Finding Yes, previously reported as MW2022-006. Recommendation CUAHSI should ensure that, to the extent practicable, the use of a competitive procurement process in compliance with 2 CFR section 200/317. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action See accompanying Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING 2023-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): Contract #65873, SLT-3157 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Natural Resources Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Procurement The County did adopt an applicable federal purchasing policy. The Lake County Indiana Purchasing Manual for Supplies, Services and Public Works states on page 19 that "Federal funds more than $50,000 but less than $150,000 will invite 3 quotes at an open public meeting . . .", which is the federal requirement for small purchases. However, the County did not follow this policy. In 2023, the County had one vendor that was paid a total of $97,525 from COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) under Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. However, the County did not obtain price or rate quotes for the one applicable vendor under the small purchase threshold as required. Suspension and Debarment Prior to entering into subawards and covered transactions with the SLFRF award funds, recipients are required to verify that such contractors and subrecipients are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. "Covered transactions" include, but are not limited to, contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (i.e., grant agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 and all subawards. The verification is to be done by checking the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS), collecting a certification from that person or entity, or adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person or entity. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The County did not have policies or procedures in place related to the suspension and debarment requirements for the SLFRF funds. Two covered transactions totaling $1,990,616 paid from SLFRF funds were identified. Documentation to show that suspension and debarment was verified prior to entering into contracts with these two vendors could not be provided by the County. The amounts for which suspension and debarment were not verified for Contract #65873 from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and the SLT-3157 directly from the Department of the Treasury were $176,711 and $1,813,905, respectively. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the transactions identified above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(i) states: "The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. (a) Informal Procurement methods. When the value of the procurement for property or services under a Federal award does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), as defined in § 200.1, or a lower threshold established by a non-Federal entity, formal procurement methods are not required. The non-Federal entity may use informal procurement methods to expedite the completion of its transactions and minimize the associated administrative burden and cost. The informal methods used for procurement of property or services at or below the SAT include: . . . (2) Small purchases - (i) Small purchase procedures. The acquisition of property or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as determined appropriate by the non-Federal entity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 LAKE COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 180.300 states: "When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking SAM Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person." Cause The County's purchasing policy does not provide procedures on how the County will ensure the appropriate number of quotes will be obtained for small purchases or how the County will ensure compliance with the suspension and debarment requirements. Effect Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the repayment or loss of future federal funding to the County. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation Management of the County should develop procedures to ensure the appropriate procurement methods are used for items or services procured that are within the small purchase threshold and to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred when expending federal funds. Appropriate documentation should be maintained to ensure compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
The City did not have adequate internal controls and did not comply with federal suspension and debarment requirements. Assistance Listing Number and Title: 21.027 – COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Award/Contract Number: N/A Pass-through Entity Name: N/A Pass-through Award/Contract Number: N/A Known Questioned Cost Amount: $0 Prior Year Audit Finding: N/A Background The purpose of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program is to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s negative effects on public health and the economy, provide government services to the extent COVID-19 caused a reduction in revenues collected, make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure, provide emergency relief from natural disasters or their negative economic impacts, fund projects eligible under certain programs administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation through three pathways and fund projects eligible under the programs established in Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. In 2023, the City spent $388,125 in program funds for these activities. Federal regulations require recipients to establish, document and maintain internal controls that ensure compliance with program requirements. These controls include understanding program requirements and monitoring the effectiveness of established controls. Federal requirements prohibit recipients from contracting with or purchasing from parties suspended or debarred from doing business with the federal government. Whenever the City enters into contracts or purchases goods or services that it expects to equal or exceed $25,000, paid all or in part with federal funds, it must verify the contractors are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federal programs. The City may verify this by obtaining a written certification from the contractor, adding a clause or condition into the contract that states the contractor is not suspended or debarred, or checking for exclusion records in the U.S. General Services Administration's System for Award Management at SAM.gov. The City must verify this before entering into the contract, and must maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this federal requirement. Description of Condition Although the City has a process to verify the suspension and debarment status for contractors it pays $25,000 or more using federal funds, our audit found the City did not follow this process and did not verify the one contractor we tested was not suspended or debarred before entering into the contract with them. We consider this deficiency in internal controls to be a material weakness that led to material noncompliance. Cause of Condition City staff were aware of the federal suspension and debarment verification requirements and normally verify that the requirements are met during the procurement process. However, the City experienced turnover in the position responsible for documenting the verification. Current City staff were unable to find documentation showing evidence that they verified the contractor’s suspension and debarment status. Effect of Condition The City did not obtain a written certification from the contractor, insert a clause into the contract or check for exclusion records at SAM.gov to verify the contractor it paid $56,217 using federal funds was not suspended or debarred before contracting with or purchasing from them. Without adequate internal controls, the City increases its risk of awarding federal funds to contractors that are excluded from participating in federal programs. Any payments the City made to an ineligible party would be unallowable, and the awarding agency could potentially recover them. We subsequently verified the contractor was not suspended or debarred. Therefore, we are not questioning costs. Recommendation We recommend the City strengthen its internal controls to verify all contractors it pays $25,000 or more, all or in part with federal funds, are not suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs and maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with this requirement. City’s Response The City of North Bend acknowledges that a contract utilizing SLFRF funds, and awarded to a software vendor, did not include within the contract a required self-attestation concerning Suspensions and Debarments. The self-attestation was used in lieu of a documented review of the SAM.gov portal for suspensions and debarments. This was an oversight of contract review process. Other contracts issued during the same period included self-attestation language from 2 CFR 200.317 through 2 CFR 200.327. In 2024 and 2025, the Public Works Deputy Director, Contract Specialist, and Capital Staff Accountant ensure adherence to all applicable local, state, and federal procurement laws and regulations as provided in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.214, 2 CFR Part 180, and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 CFR part 19, prohibiting recipients from entering into contracts with suspended or debarred parties. The City of North Bend understands the significance of the finding and immediately took steps to review all subsequent contracts for compliance. Auditor’s Remarks We thank the City for its cooperation throughout the audit and the steps it has taken to address the concern. We will review the status of the City’s corrective action during our next regular audit. Applicable Laws and Regulations Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), section 516, Audit findings, establishes reporting requirements for audit findings. Title 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Guidance, section 303, Internal controls, describes the requirements for auditees to maintain internal controls over federal programs and comply with federal program requirements. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants defines significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in its Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, section 935, Compliance Audits, paragraph 11. Title 2 CFR part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) establishes nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations, implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689.
Criteria: an entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Center maintans specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, they have inconsistently or inadequately been using those manuals and guidelines. The Center made two large purchases under the Head Start grant exceeding micro-purchase thresholds without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Thresholds are often considered based on unit price instead of the aggregate purchase amount based on certain grantor requirements to obtain written approval for purchases based on unit price. In addition, procedures are considered unnecessary by management for purchases falling within the grantor approved budget amounts. Effect: Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in costs with other vendors. Recommendation: We recommend management assess and adhere to the internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds.
Criteria: an entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Center maintans specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, they have inconsistently or inadequately been using those manuals and guidelines. The Center made two large purchases under the Head Start grant exceeding micro-purchase thresholds without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Thresholds are often considered based on unit price instead of the aggregate purchase amount based on certain grantor requirements to obtain written approval for purchases based on unit price. In addition, procedures are considered unnecessary by management for purchases falling within the grantor approved budget amounts. Effect: Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in costs with other vendors. Recommendation: We recommend management assess and adhere to the internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds.
Criteria: an entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Center maintans specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, they have inconsistently or inadequately been using those manuals and guidelines. The Center made two large purchases under the Head Start grant exceeding micro-purchase thresholds without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Thresholds are often considered based on unit price instead of the aggregate purchase amount based on certain grantor requirements to obtain written approval for purchases based on unit price. In addition, procedures are considered unnecessary by management for purchases falling within the grantor approved budget amounts. Effect: Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in costs with other vendors. Recommendation: We recommend management assess and adhere to the internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Criteria The non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of §§ 200.317, §§ 200.318, and §§ 200.319 when procuring the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or subaward. Condition The County approved a contract to be paid for with federal awards without following 2CFR200.320(b), formal procurement methods, as the contract exceed the use of 2CFR200.320(a), informal procurement methods. Cause The County was not aware of the formal procurement method requirement for Federal awards. Effect The County was out of complaince with 2CFR200.320, Methods of Procurement to be Followed. Questioned Costs $431,191 Perspective Information The County has a written Federal procurement policy in accordance with 2CFR200.317 through 200.327. The County received COVID related Federal award funds and due to the inexperience and lack of guidance on the use and compliance requirements of the award, did not procure a project in accordance with the 2CFR200.320. Identification of Repeat Findings This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the County receive additional training related to procurement activities and expand the County's internal controls related to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials We agree with the audit findings and are taking corrective action to train Grant Administrators, elected officials and employees on the procurement standards related to Federal awards.
Finding 2023-004 – Procurement Policy Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR, Part §200.318 "General Procurement Standards", the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's document procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Condition: During our review of the Coalition's Policies and Procedures, we determined that the Coalition's Procurement policy does not comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Coalition was unaware of the changes in General Procurement Standards within Uniform Guidance and therefore does not have sufficiently established control policies and procedures to comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Effect: The Coalition does not have the ability to determine if disbursements, projects, and bids comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition becomes familiar with requirements of 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. and establishes appropriate internal control policies and procedures related to procurement and that all staff be trained in those policies and procedures, so they are familiar with the requirements. We further recommend no contract or agreement be awarded by the Coalition in which appropriate procurement policies have not been followed. Views of Responsible Officials: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.
Finding 2023-004 – Procurement Policy Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR, Part §200.318 "General Procurement Standards", the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's document procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Condition: During our review of the Coalition's Policies and Procedures, we determined that the Coalition's Procurement policy does not comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Coalition was unaware of the changes in General Procurement Standards within Uniform Guidance and therefore does not have sufficiently established control policies and procedures to comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Effect: The Coalition does not have the ability to determine if disbursements, projects, and bids comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition becomes familiar with requirements of 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. and establishes appropriate internal control policies and procedures related to procurement and that all staff be trained in those policies and procedures, so they are familiar with the requirements. We further recommend no contract or agreement be awarded by the Coalition in which appropriate procurement policies have not been followed. Views of Responsible Officials: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.
Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086491-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Board did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the project evaluation and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from project evaluation and coordination services billed (federal portion) during the October 1, 2022, through September 29, 2023, period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted to SAMHSA. Known Questioned Costs: $150,000 Context: We tested the procurement of the one material contract and identified the contract did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: Prior to the Board being awarded of the grant, a bid for grant writing services was procured with the additional question of the availability of project evaluation services being able to be provided. Since the grant writing was procured and the Board decided to contract with the same consulting firm that provided the grant writing, they did not believe they needed to bid the project evaluation and coordination services for this project. The Board did not utilize federal procurement requirements to ensure fair and open competition and reasonable cost for project evaluation and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic project. Recommendation: We recommend the Board follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319(d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.
2023-003: Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086680-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Authority did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contracted service providers utilized for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from the tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contractor payments billed (federal portion) during the October 1, 2022, through September 29, 2023, period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted to SAMHSA. Known Questioned Costs: $33,440 Context: We tested the procurement of the three contracts related to tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contract service providers utilized and funded by the grant and identified that two of the three contracts did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: Prior to the Authority being awarded the grant, tele-health services were previously being provided under a current contract. The Authority was not able to document the basis for not providing a competitive procurement of tele-health services specific to this contract nor supporting a reason it should follow a noncompetitive procurement methodology. The contract for SUD Peer Recovery Services has been indicated by management to meet the criteria as a sole source procurement as allowed under 2 CFR 200.320(c); however, adequate documentation was not available to support this claim at the time the contract was awarded (subsequently a Google search was provided of only Lapeer and Sanilac Counties). The Authority did not utilize federal procurement requirements to ensure fair and open competition and reasonable cost for tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Services and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic project. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319(d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance (Procurement, Suspension & Debarment) Federal Program: U.S. Department of Treasury – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (AL #21.027) Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.318(a) requires non-Federal entities to establish and use documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in Sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: While the County does have a written procurement policy that meets the requirements, the policy was not being followed. The County did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, or the basis for the contract price. The County did not maintain documentation to sufficiently support a written price analysis on one procurement tested. The County was unable to provide proposals from non-winning bidders and/or a price analysis when only one bid was received on two contracts tested. The County does not have formal procedures or controls in place to ensure written documentation of a cost analysis or a contract file are maintained. Cause: The County does not have controls in place to ensure that its procurement policy is being followed and that contract files are complete. Effect: As a result of this condition, the County did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement controls to ensure the procurement policy is followed and complete contract files are maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: The County will work to implement controls to ensure the procurement policy is followed.
Criteria: an entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Center maintans specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, they have inconsistently or inadequately been using those manuals and guidelines. The Center made two large purchases under the Head Start grant exceeding micro-purchase thresholds without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Thresholds are often considered based on unit price instead of the aggregate purchase amount based on certain grantor requirements to obtain written approval for purchases based on unit price. In addition, procedures are considered unnecessary by management for purchases falling within the grantor approved budget amounts. Effect: Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in costs with other vendors. Recommendation: We recommend management assess and adhere to the internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds.
Criteria: an entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Center maintans specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, they have inconsistently or inadequately been using those manuals and guidelines. The Center made two large purchases under the Head Start grant exceeding micro-purchase thresholds without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Thresholds are often considered based on unit price instead of the aggregate purchase amount based on certain grantor requirements to obtain written approval for purchases based on unit price. In addition, procedures are considered unnecessary by management for purchases falling within the grantor approved budget amounts. Effect: Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in costs with other vendors. Recommendation: We recommend management assess and adhere to the internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds.
Criteria: an entity must have and use documented procurement policies consistent with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The procedures must confirm to the procurement standards identified in CFR § 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: The Center maintans specific grant manuals and guidelines as its written policies; however, they have inconsistently or inadequately been using those manuals and guidelines. The Center made two large purchases under the Head Start grant exceeding micro-purchase thresholds without obtaining price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources. Cause: Thresholds are often considered based on unit price instead of the aggregate purchase amount based on certain grantor requirements to obtain written approval for purchases based on unit price. In addition, procedures are considered unnecessary by management for purchases falling within the grantor approved budget amounts. Effect: Failure to follow appropriate procurement procedures could result in excess procurement costs being disallowed or subject the entity to possible claims. It was determined that the items procured were reasonable in costs with other vendors. Recommendation: We recommend management assess and adhere to the internally developed policy for all procurements using Federally sourced funds.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Failure to Follow Procurement Policy Finding 2023-003 Condition: The Authority did not comply with the current procurement policy as procedures were not fully followed and forms required by the Authority’s procurement policy were not completed. The following forms required by either 2 CFR 200 and/or the Authority’s own procurement policy were not completed for the current year capital asset purchases: Written Record of Procurement Checklist Form, Method of Procurement Decision Matrix, Advertisement and Solicitation Form, Bid Quotations, Fewer Than 3 Offers Received Evaluation if applicable, Proposal Tabulation, Certification of Compliance with Federal Clauses for the assets less than $25,000, and Responsibility Determination (sam.gov debarred verification). Also, as stated in the prior finding, the procurement policy needs to be updated. Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.214 Suspension and Debarment, Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. The following excerpts are from 2 CFR Part 200.318 General Procurement Standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. (i) the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. According to 2 CFR 200.320 Methods of Procurement to be Followed, the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of this section and §§ 200.317, 200.318, and 200.319 for any of the following methods of procurement used for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or sub-award. Concurrently, the Authority’s did not comply with its own current procurement policy as it did not follow or prepare the required documentation detailed in the following sections. Procurement Requests-The Authority will maintain sufficient records to detail the history of a procurement. Such records shall include method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection (or rejection), and the contract price. The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as nonresponsible and ineligible for contract award. Debarment and Suspension- The Authority will treat any prospective contractor or sub-contractor listed on a centralized State government debarment and suspension list as non-responsible and ineligible for contract awards. To see if a prospective contractor is eligible, we will look on the website www.SAM.gov and when the bid has been received. Methods of Procurement- a. Micro and Emergency Purchases (do not exceed $10,000)-(a) A written determination as to why price is deemed fair and reasonable must be on file with each purchase made under this method of procurement using Micro-Purchase Price Reasonableness Determination Form. (b) Splitting of procurements to avoid the competitive procurement requirements of federal and state statues shall not be condoned. b. Small Purchase Procurement ($10,000 to $250,000)-(a) A minimum of two price or rate quotations shall be obtained from qualified sources; (b) The procurement will be made from the lowest priced qualified bid, if products or goods are equal; (c) MDOT requires for procurements under $25,000.00. Included Procurement Appendix A, B, E, F, G, H, or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. (d) MDOT requires for procurements over $25,000.00 solicitations, including specifications and written selection procedures (lowest bids), Include Procurement Appendix A, F, G, H or I and Vehicle Specification certification if applies. Third Party Contracts with applicable clauses and bond documents must be included. Cause: The Authority did not follow its own procurement policy. Effect: The Authority is noncompliant with 2 CFR 200 and its own procurement policy. Directive: We direct the Authority review and update its procurement policy and implement procedures to ensure that the Authority is complying with the federal requirements, required forms are being completed, and documentation is being maintained. Management’s Response--Corrective Action Plan: Contact person is Rufus Adams, Executive Director, 275 East Wall Street, P.O. Box 837, Benton Harbor, Michigan 49023. Telephone (269) 927-2268. The Authority will review and update its procurement policy to comply with federal requirements. The Authority’s management, consultant, and finance director will review the procedures in the policy to ensure they are being acted upon accordingly going forward.
Criteria The non-federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with the standards of §§ 200.317, §§ 200.318, and §§ 200.319 when procuring the acquisition of property or services under a Federal award or subaward. Condition The County approved a contract to be paid for with federal awards without following 2CFR200.320(b), formal procurement methods, as the contract exceed the use of 2CFR200.320(a), informal procurement methods. Cause The County was not aware of the formal procurement method requirement for Federal awards. Effect The County was out of complaince with 2CFR200.320, Methods of Procurement to be Followed. Questioned Costs $431,191 Perspective Information The County has a written Federal procurement policy in accordance with 2CFR200.317 through 200.327. The County received COVID related Federal award funds and due to the inexperience and lack of guidance on the use and compliance requirements of the award, did not procure a project in accordance with the 2CFR200.320. Identification of Repeat Findings This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend the County receive additional training related to procurement activities and expand the County's internal controls related to Federal awards. Views of Responsible Officials We agree with the audit findings and are taking corrective action to train Grant Administrators, elected officials and employees on the procurement standards related to Federal awards.
Finding 2023-004 – Procurement Policy Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR, Part §200.318 "General Procurement Standards", the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's document procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Condition: During our review of the Coalition's Policies and Procedures, we determined that the Coalition's Procurement policy does not comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Coalition was unaware of the changes in General Procurement Standards within Uniform Guidance and therefore does not have sufficiently established control policies and procedures to comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Effect: The Coalition does not have the ability to determine if disbursements, projects, and bids comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition becomes familiar with requirements of 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. and establishes appropriate internal control policies and procedures related to procurement and that all staff be trained in those policies and procedures, so they are familiar with the requirements. We further recommend no contract or agreement be awarded by the Coalition in which appropriate procurement policies have not been followed. Views of Responsible Officials: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.
Finding 2023-004 – Procurement Policy Criteria: In accordance with Uniform Guidance 2 CFR, Part §200.318 "General Procurement Standards", the non-federal entity must have and use documented procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The non-federal entity's document procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Condition: During our review of the Coalition's Policies and Procedures, we determined that the Coalition's Procurement policy does not comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Coalition was unaware of the changes in General Procurement Standards within Uniform Guidance and therefore does not have sufficiently established control policies and procedures to comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Effect: The Coalition does not have the ability to determine if disbursements, projects, and bids comply with 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. Recommendation: We recommend the Coalition becomes familiar with requirements of 2 CFR, Part §200.317 - §200.327. and establishes appropriate internal control policies and procedures related to procurement and that all staff be trained in those policies and procedures, so they are familiar with the requirements. We further recommend no contract or agreement be awarded by the Coalition in which appropriate procurement policies have not been followed. Views of Responsible Officials: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.
Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086491-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Board did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the project evaluation and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from project evaluation and coordination services billed (federal portion) during the October 1, 2022, through September 29, 2023, period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted to SAMHSA. Known Questioned Costs: $150,000 Context: We tested the procurement of the one material contract and identified the contract did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: Prior to the Board being awarded of the grant, a bid for grant writing services was procured with the additional question of the availability of project evaluation services being able to be provided. Since the grant writing was procured and the Board decided to contract with the same consulting firm that provided the grant writing, they did not believe they needed to bid the project evaluation and coordination services for this project. The Board did not utilize federal procurement requirements to ensure fair and open competition and reasonable cost for project evaluation and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic project. Recommendation: We recommend the Board follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319(d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.
2023-003: Procurement Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 93.696, Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grant Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 1H79SM086680-01, Program Grant Period 09/29/2022-09/29/2023 Pass-through Entity: N/A SANILAC COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.318(a), the non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. The non-Federal entity's documented procurement procedures must conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327. In addition, per 2 CFR 200.318(i), the non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Condition: The Authority did not utilize federal procurement requirements cited above for the tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contracted service providers utilized for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics project. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: The questioned costs were determined from the tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contractor payments billed (federal portion) during the October 1, 2022, through September 29, 2023, period as summarized from the request for disbursement of funds submitted to SAMHSA. Known Questioned Costs: $33,440 Context: We tested the procurement of the three contracts related to tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Service contract service providers utilized and funded by the grant and identified that two of the three contracts did not follow federal procurement requirements. Cause/Effect: Prior to the Authority being awarded the grant, tele-health services were previously being provided under a current contract. The Authority was not able to document the basis for not providing a competitive procurement of tele-health services specific to this contract nor supporting a reason it should follow a noncompetitive procurement methodology. The contract for SUD Peer Recovery Services has been indicated by management to meet the criteria as a sole source procurement as allowed under 2 CFR 200.320(c); however, adequate documentation was not available to support this claim at the time the contract was awarded (subsequently a Google search was provided of only Lapeer and Sanilac Counties). The Authority did not utilize federal procurement requirements to ensure fair and open competition and reasonable cost for tele-health services and SUD Peer Recovery Services and coordination services for the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic project. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority follow federal procurement as required in 2 CFR 200.319(d) for all contracts reimbursed with federal funds. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Plan: See attached corrective action plan.
Finding Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance (Procurement, Suspension & Debarment) Federal Program: U.S. Department of Treasury – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (AL #21.027) Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.318(a) requires non-Federal entities to establish and use documented procurement procedures that conform to the procurement standards identified in Sections 200.317 through 200.327. Condition: While the County does have a written procurement policy that meets the requirements, the policy was not being followed. The County did not maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, or the basis for the contract price. The County did not maintain documentation to sufficiently support a written price analysis on one procurement tested. The County was unable to provide proposals from non-winning bidders and/or a price analysis when only one bid was received on two contracts tested. The County does not have formal procedures or controls in place to ensure written documentation of a cost analysis or a contract file are maintained. Cause: The County does not have controls in place to ensure that its procurement policy is being followed and that contract files are complete. Effect: As a result of this condition, the County did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: No costs have been questioned as a result of this finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the County implement controls to ensure the procurement policy is followed and complete contract files are maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: The County will work to implement controls to ensure the procurement policy is followed.
Finding Number: 2023-025 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Government Department/Agency: Department of Health (DOH) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) ALN: 10.557 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria - When procuring property and services, states must use the same policies and procedures they use for procurements from their non-federal funds (2 CFR section 200.317). Per Procurement Manual, User Agencies are required to submit a written justification letter to the Government’s Department of Property and Procurement (DPP), which was signed by the agency head, which explains the need for the services, the exception in title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, section 239(a) being relied upon, the methodology for the selection process, and the rationale for selecting the prospective contractor. The letter must identify the funding source and comply with all other requirements necessary for the acquisition of services under title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, sections 239(a) (1), (2) or (3) whichever is applicable. The letter must contain an “approve/disapprove” block for the Commissioner of Property and Procurement. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition - In our review of 9 out of 86 procurement transactions, we noted the following: - 1 procurement that did not have supporting documentation to verify the method of procurement, selection of the contract type and basis for the contract price. -2 procurements did not contain evidence that a quotation was obtained prior to selection of the vendor. -1 procurement where no supporting documentation was available for review. Further, we noted that internal controls were not operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the procurement compliance requirements. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DPP’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Total amount of procurement transactions was $314,776. Total amount sampled was $40,332. The known amount of exceptions is $29,256. Effect – DPP could inadvertently contract or make sub-awards to parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the Federal government as well as award contracts to vendors whose contract prices are unreasonable. In addition, contracts may be executed to unqualified vendors. Cause – DPP does not appear to have a process in place to adequately monitor and maintain completed contract files comprising of all supporting documents. Recommendation – We recommend that DPP improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations relating to the procurement of goods and services and review current records retention policies. There should be timely coordination and communication amongst all Government departments and/or agencies that are responsible for handling and managing procurement tasks. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. DOH will collaborate with DPP to strengthen internal controls and ensure compliance with federal procurement regulations. DOH will also encourage DPP to review records retention policies. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2023-027 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Government Department/Agency: Department of Health (DOH) WIC Grants to States (WGS) ALN: 10.578 Award #: 1VI700748 Award Period: 07/01/19 - 12/31/23 Criteria - When procuring property and services, states must use the same policies and procedures they use for procurements from their non-federal funds (2 CFR section 200.317). Per Procurement Manual, User Agencies are required to submit a written justification letter to the Government’s Department of Property and Procurement (DPP), which was signed by the agency head, which explains the need for the services, the exception in title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, section 239(a) being relied upon, the methodology for the selection process, and the rationale for selecting the prospective contractor. The letter must identify the funding source and comply with all other requirements necessary for the acquisition of services under title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, sections 239(a) (1), (2) or (3) whichever is applicable. The letter must contain an “approve/disapprove” block for the Commissioner of Property and Procurement. Further, non-Federal entity must comply with section 70914 of the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA), including through incorporation of a Buy America preference in the terms and conditions of each award with an infrastructure project or obtain waiver. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition - In our review of 5 out of 13 procurement transactions, we noted the following: - 1 procurement transaction did not contain sufficient supporting documentation to validate adherence to procurement policy. - 1 procurement transaction did not contain evidence that a quotation and justification letter was obtained prior to selection of the vendor. - 2 procurements did not include Buy America domestic preference provisions in the agreement or obtained a BABA waiver. Further, we noted that internal controls were not operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the procurement compliance requirements. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DPP’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Total amount of procurement transactions was $3,133,788. Total amount sampled was $3,100,835. The known amount of exceptions is $3,096,961. Effect – DPP could inadvertently contract or make sub-awards to parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the Federal government as well as award contracts to vendors whose contract prices are unreasonable. In addition, contracts may be executed to unqualified vendors. Cause – DPP does not appear to have a process in place to adequately monitor and maintain completed contract files comprising of all supporting documents. Recommendation – We recommend that DPP improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations relating to the procurement of goods and services and review current records retention policies. There should be timely coordination and communication amongst all Government departments and/or agencies that are responsible for handling and managing procurement tasks. Views of Responsible Officials - The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. To ensure that the WIC program is included in all processes and receive all documents and correspondence relating to WIC Special Funding as a secondary oversight of the transactions. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number: 2023-037 Prior Year Finding Number: 2022-032 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program: U.S. Department of the Interior Government Department/Agency: Various Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories ALN: 15.875 Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – When procuring property and services, states must use the same policies and procedures they use for procurements from their non-federal funds (2 CFR section 200.317). Per Procurement Manual, User Agencies are required to submit a written justification letter to the Government’s Department of Property and Procurement (DPP), which was signed by the agency head, which explains the need for the services, the exception in title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, section 239(a) being relied upon, the methodology for the selection process, and the rationale for selecting the prospective contractor. The letter must identify the funding source and comply with all other requirements necessary for the acquisition of services under title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, sections 239(a) (1), (2) or (3) whichever is applicable. The letter must contain an “approve/disapprove” block for the Commissioner of Property and Procurement. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – In our review of 15 out of 78 procurement transactions, we were unable to obtain the contract files for 4 procurement transactions to validate adherence to procurement policy. In addition, we noted 5 procurements did not include the following: - Contract file documents showing the significant history of the procurement, including the rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis of contract price. - The procurement provides full and open competition. - Documentation in support of the rationale to limit competition in those cases where competition was limited and ascertain if the limitation was justified. - Cost or price analysis in connection with procurement action, including contract modifications and that this analysis supported the procurement action. Further, we noted that internal controls were not operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the procurement compliance requirements. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of DPP’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Total amount of procurement transactions was $4,159,155. Total amount sampled was $2,948,589. The known amount of exceptions is $2,336,143. Effect – DPP could inadvertently contract or make sub-awards to parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the Federal government as well as award contracts to vendors whose contract prices are unreasonable. In addition, contracts may be executed to unqualified vendors. Cause – DPP does not appear to have a process in place to adequately monitor and maintain completed contract files comprising of all supporting documents. Recommendation – We recommend that DPP improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations relating to the procurement of goods and services and review current records retention policies. There should be timely coordination and communication amongst all Government departments and/or agencies that are responsible for handling and managing procurement tasks. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. The Government updated its procurement laws and issued revised manuals, along with position-specific Standard Operating Procedures. Processes to enforce internal controls and ensure adherence to procurement laws have been established and are regularly reinforced. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding Number 2023-054 Prior Year Finding Number: N/A Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program: U.S. Department of Education Government Department/Agency: Department of Education (VIDE) Consolidated Grant to the Outlying Areas ALN: 84.403A Award #: Various Award Period: Various Criteria – When procuring property and services, states must use the same policies and procedures they use for procurements from their non-federal funds (2 CFR section 200.317). Per Procurement Manual, User Agencies are required to submit a written justification letter to the Government’s Department of Property and Procurement (DPP), which was signed by the agency head, which explains the need for the services, the exception in title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, section 239(a) being relied upon, the methodology for the selection process, and the rationale for selecting the prospective contractor. The letter must identify the funding source and comply with all other requirements necessary for the acquisition of services under title 31, Virgin Islands Code, chapter 23, sections 239(a) (1), (2) or (3) whichever is applicable. The letter must contain an “approve/disapprove” block for the Commissioner of Property and Procurement. Additionally, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR Section 200.303, Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition – In our review of 40 out of 354 procurement transactions, we noted 2 transactions in which the approved Short Form Contract required for service-related procurement were not available for review. Further, we noted that internal controls were not operating at a level of precision to ensure compliance with the procurement compliance requirements. Questioned Costs – None. Context – This is a condition identified per review of VIDE’s compliance with the specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Total amount of procurement transactions was $6,434,229. Total amount sampled was $1,428,065. The known amount of exceptions is $95,120. Effect – VIDE could inadvertently contract or make sub-awards to parties that are suspended or debarred from doing business with the Federal government as well as award contracts to vendors whose contract prices are unreasonable. In addition, contracts may be executed to unqualified vendors. Cause – VIDE does not appear to have a process in place to adequately monitor and maintain completed contract files comprising of all supporting documents. Recommendation – We recommend that VIDE improve internal controls to ensure adherence to federal regulations relating to the procurement of services and review current records retention policies. There should be timely coordination and communication amongst all Government departments and/or agencies that are responsible for handling and managing procurement tasks. Views of Responsible Officials – The Government concurs with the auditor’s findings and recommendations. VIDE recognizes that the unavailability of approved Short Form Contracts during the audit indicates a gap in record retention and file maintenance. To address this, the Business Office will not process any payment voucher for service-related procurements unless the approved Short Form Contract is attached to the ERP transaction as a mandatory supporting document. To ensure records are maintained and readily available for future reviews, the Procurement Division will digitize all executed Short Form Contracts and upload them to the department’s centralized SharePoint repository immediately upon execution. The planned corrective actions are presented in the Government’s Corrective Action Plan attached as Appendix B to the Single Audit Report.
Finding No.: 2023-016 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior AL Program: 15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories Federal Award No.: Compact of Free Association, As Amended Questioned Costs: $314,943 Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Section 200.317 of 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards states that, when procuring property and services under a Federal award, a state must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. RepMar’s Procurement Code states the following: (a) Section 124 - unless otherwise authorized by law, all Government contracts shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding. (b) Section 127 - procurement of goods and services not exceeding $25,000 may be made in accordance with small purchase procedures promulgated by RepMar’s Policy Office. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than $25,000. RepMar’s Ministry of Finance, Banking and Postal Services has previously declared that if small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations shall be obtained from three qualified sources. (c) Section 128 - a contract may be awarded for a supply, service, or construction item without competition when it is determined in writing that there is only one source for the required supply, service, or construction item. The RMI Procurement Regulations Pursuant to the Procurement Code Act 1988 (RMI Procurement Regulations) Sections 5 and 6 stipulate procedures pertaining to suspension or debarment of persons who shall not be considered for award of contracts. 2 CFR 200.214 states that recipients and subrecipients are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. 2 CFR 180.300 states that when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by doing the following: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that a recipient of a Federal award must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition 1: For 8 (or 12%) of 65 procurement transactions tested, aggregating $6,463,583 of $16,926,745 in total transactions subject to procurement requirements, there was no procurement file provided to substantiate compliance with applicable procurement requirements as follows: Item # Fund # Voucher # Amount 1 10410 22/00001589 JOURNAL $ 11,581 2 10409 22/00001587 JOURNAL 167,852 3 10401 22/00003286 PINVOICE 21,178 4 10406 22/00003856 PINVOICE 9,950 5 10406 22/00005332 PINVOICE 10,275 6 10401 22/00000717 PINVOICE 23,247 7 10406 22/00005350 PINVOICE 24,995 8 10406 22/00001939 PINVOICE 10,437 $ 279,515 Condition 2: For 3 (or 5%) of 65 procurement transactions tested, aggregating $6,463,583 of $16,926,745 in total transactions, the procurement documentation is insufficient to support the rationale for vendor selection in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.323 and 48 CFR section 15.404-3. Item # Fund # Voucher # Amount 1 10402 22/00003565 PINVOICE $ 4,784 2 10402 22/00004883 PINVOICE 5,000 3 10406 22/00002441 PV 660 $ 10,444 For 9 (or 14%) of 65 procurement transactions tested, aggregating $6,463,583 of $16,926,745 in total transactions, supporting procurement documentation was not sufficient to substantiate compliance with applicable procurement requirements as follows: Item # Fund # Voucher # Amount 1 10402 22/00004885 PINVOICE $ 5,000 2 10402 22/00005513 PINVOICE 1,430 3 10406 22/00003035 PV 508 4 10406 22/00011377 PV 4,870 5 10406 22/00000549 PV 336 6 10403 22/00011927 PV 2,319 7 10401 22/00001875 PINVOICE 2,195 8 10402 22/00003839 PV 2,565 9 10402 22/00000269 PV 5,761 $ 24,984 No quotations/ cost comparison were provided for the items. The procurement documentation is insufficient to demonstrate compliance with applicable procurement requirements. Condition 4: Documented evidence of compliance with RMI Procurement Regulations and 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR 180.300 regarding debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded persons or entities was not made available. Cause: RepMar did not enforce internal control policies and procedures over documentation of the procurement process to satisfy compliance with applicable procurement requirements. Effect: RepMar is in noncompliance with applicable procurement requirements. The reportable questioned cost is $314,943. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Finding No. 2022-006 Recommendation: Responsible personnel should require that documentation be adequate to comply with applicable procurement requirements. Specifically, documentation should indicate the history of procurement, including the rationale for contractor or vendor selection. Views of Responsible Officials: RepMar’s Corrective Action Plan does not indicate disagreement and provides planned corrective action.
Finding No.: 2023-017 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL Program: 93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Federal Award No.: NU50CK000558 Questioned Costs: $6,500 Area: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Section 200.317 of 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards states that, when procuring property and services under a Federal award, a state must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. RepMar’s Procurement Code states the following: (a) Section 124 - unless otherwise authorized by law, all Government contracts shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding. (b) Section 125 – (1) contracts shall be awarded by competitive sealed bidding. (2) An invitation for bids shall be issued and shall include a purchase description and all contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement. (3) adequate public notice of the invitation for bids shall be given a reasonable time. (4) Bids shall be opened publicly in the presence of one or more witnesses at the time and place designated in the invitation for bid. (5) Bids shall be unconditionally accepted without alteration or correction. (c) Section 127 - procurement of goods and services not exceeding $25,000 may be made in accordance with small purchase procedures promulgated by RepMar’s Policy Office. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than $25,000. RepMar’s Ministry of Finance, Banking and Postal Services has previously declared that if small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations shall be obtained from three qualified sources. (d) Section 128 - a contract may be awarded for a supply, service, or construction item without competition when it is determined in writing that there is only one source for the required supply, service, or construction item. The RMI Procurement Regulations Pursuant to the Procurement Code Act 1988 (RMI Procurement Regulations) Sections 5 and 6 stipulate procedures pertaining to suspension or debarment of persons who shall not be considered for award of contracts. 2 CFR 200.214 states that recipients and subrecipients are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. 2 CFR 180.300 states that when an entity enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, the entity must verify that the person with whom the entity intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified by doing the following: (a) Checking SAM.gov Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Furthermore, 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that a recipient of a Federal award must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition 1: For 1 (or 6%) of 17 procurement transactions tested, aggregating $89,724 of $1,985,592 in total transactions subject to procurement requirements, no procurement file was provided to substantiate vendor selection. Item # Reference # Expenditure Amount Questioned Cost 1 22/00001586 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Condition 2: For 1 (or 6%) of 17 procurement transactions tested, aggregating $89,724 of $1,985,592 in total transactions, supporting procurement documentation was not sufficient to substantiate compliance with applicable procurement requirements as follows: Item # Reference # Expenditure Amount Questioned Cost 1 22/00002281 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 Condition 3: Documented evidence of compliance with RMI Procurement Regulations and 2 CFR 200.214 and 2 CFR 180.300 regarding debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded persons or entities was not made available. Cause: RepMar did not enforce adequate internal control policies and procedures over documentation of the procurement process to satisfy compliance with applicable procurement requirements. Further, RepMar lacks policies and procedures requiring verification of the status of an entity with which RepMar intends to enter into a covered transaction. Effect: RepMar is in noncompliance with applicable procurement requirements. Accordingly, questioned costs of $6,500 result because the projected questioned cost amount exceeds the $25,000 threshold. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Finding No. 2022-008 Recommendation: Responsible personnel should require that documentation be adequate to comply with applicable procurement requirements and regulations. Specifically, documentation should indicate the history of procurement, including the rationale for contractor or vendor selection, and verification of whether an entity or person with whom RepMar intends to do business is not excluded or disqualified. Views of Responsible Officials: RepMar’s Corrective Action Plan does not indicate disagreement and provides planned corrective action.
The County should establish controls to ensure compliance with procurement law as it relates to federal expenditures. Procurements involving federal awards must comply with 2 CFR §§ 200.317–200.327. These sections require non-Federal entities to maintain written procurement procedures that reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in Uniform Guidance. Requirements include full and open competition, appropriate documentation of procurement actions, cost or price analysis for procurements exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and verification that vendors are not suspended or debarred. In addition, Mississippi counties are subject to state procurement requirements, which establish competitive bidding thresholds and procedures. Uniform Guidance requires that when procuring with federal funds, non-Federal entities must follow the more restrictive of federal, state, or local procurement requirements. During our test work of federal expenditures, we noted the County expended funds without obtaining the required competitive quotes or bids in accordance with federal procurement standards. The County did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure procurement transactions charged to federal programs complied with both Uniform Guidance and Mississippi statutory requirements. Failure to comply with federal and state procurement requirements increases the risk of improper vendor selection and may result in questioned costs. Noncompliance could subject the County to repayment of federal funds or other administrative remedies. The County should strengthen internal controls over procurement activities involving federal awards to ensure compliance with both Uniform Guidance and Mississippi law. Specifically, the County should ensure procurements comply with competitive bidding requirements.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.
Criteria Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. A non-federal entity must: 1. Meet the general procurement standards in 2 CFR section 200.318, which include oversight of contractors’ performance, maintaining written standards of conduct for employees involved in contracting, awarding contracts only to responsible contractors, and maintaining records to document history of procurements. 2. Conduct all procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.319. 3. Use the micro-purchase and small purchase methods only for procurements that meet the applicable criteria under 2 CFR sections 200.320(a) (1) and (2). 4. For acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, the non-federal entity must use one of the following procurement methods: the sealed bid method if the acquisition meets the criteria in 2 CFR section 200.320(b); the competitive proposals method under the conditions specified in 2 CFR section 200.320((b) (2); or the noncompetitive proposals method (i.e., solicit a proposal from only one source) but only when one or more of four circumstances are met, in accordance with 2 CFR section 200.320(c)). 5. Perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold, including contract modifications (2 CFR section 200.323(a)). The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be used (2 CFR section 200.323(b)). 6. Ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes applicable provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.” The requirements that apply to procurement under grants and cooperative agreements are contained in 2 CFR sections 200.317 through 200.326, program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. All non-procurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. The requirements for non-procurement suspension and debarment are contained in OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, “Debarment and Suspension;” federal awarding agency regulations in Title 2 of the CFR adopting/implementing the OMB guidance in 2 CFR Part 180; program legislation; and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition The Organization’s management recognizes that there are still active contracts under the federal program for fiscal year ending August 31, 2023 that were procured over three fiscal years ago in which adherence to procurement policies, specifically documentation history of procurement, has not been maintained. As this has been a recurring finding in which management is actively trying to get all active contracts under the current procurement policies, only those current contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years were detail tested. Of the approximately 40 active vendor contracts that were procured in the last three fiscal years that were wholly or partially funded with Unaccompanied Alien Children Program revenue dollars, seven were tested with no errors noted. Cause The Organization is aware they are operating under contracts that were procured in previous years that may not have all the records maintained. Reprocuring all of these contracts at once would potentially cause disruptions in operations due to the products/services related those vendors playing an important role in the Organization’s day-to-day operations. As such, the Organization still has several active contracts procured under the old policies that they are working on reprocuring as these contracts’ renewal dates arise, if not earlier. Effect or Potential Effect The Organization could potentially be under contract with vendors that are not the best value, not adequately qualified, potentially suspended or debarred, or otherwise not suitable for contract under federal procurement guidelines. No questioned costs were identified, as services/goods under these contracts that were previously tested were deemed to be allowable under the program, and no exceptions noted for allowable costs/activities for samples that included payment to those vendors in previous years or current year. Recommendation The Organization should review all its “legacy” contracts that were procured under the previous procurement policies to determine if there is proper documentation maintained for compliance with applicable procurement guidelines. This includes systematically re-procuring any current contracts not in compliance as soon as feasible. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See corrective action plan.