Findings Citing § 200.309

Finding 2025-002 – Allowable Costs and Period of Performance (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance)- (Partial repeat finding) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education, Higher Education – Institutional Aid (Title III), Assistance Listing No. 84.031 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E establishes cost principles to apply in determining costs under federal awards. Non-federal entities are also required to establish controls over the disbursement process to ensure compliance with allowable cost requirements. In addition, a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and non-federal entities are also required to establish controls over the disbursement process to ensure compliance with period of performance requirements. [2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)]. Condition: We selected a sample of 25 non-payroll disbursements and 25 payroll disbursements charged to the grant. There were 44 pay checks tested in the sample of 25; of those 44, nine exceptions were noted. In four instances, there was no documented approved pay rate and in five instances, there was no approval for salary to be charged to the grant number and documentation showed unrestricted, a different account or offer letter had no Title III documentation. Cause: The College did not obtain proper approval by the Director of the program, expenses did not fit into the grant budget line items, approved pay rates were not properly documented as approved Title III expenses for the proper grant period. Effect: The College’s grant disbursements were not properly approved. Questioned Costs: $14,731 Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures surrounding payroll and non-payroll grant disbursements to ensure controls are functioning and compliant withfederal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

2025-001 Costs Incurred Beyond the Period of Performance Program Name/Assistance Listing Number: 93.788 Opioid STR Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Criteria: According to 2 CFR §§200.1, 200.308, 200.309, 200.344, and 200.403(h), a non-Federal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of the Federal award’s period of performance, and any costs incurred before the Federal award was made that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. All financial obligations incurred under the Federal award must be liquidated within the required time period. Costs incurred outside the approved period of performance are unallowable and constitute questioned costs. Condition: During cash disbursement testing, it was identified that costs totaling $56,017.62 were incurred after the end of the period of performance (which ended on September 30, 2024; grant ID 2401119 SOR 3.0 – SOS). Although the expenditures were allowable in nature, they were outside the approved period and therefore did not comply with the grant terms. Cause of Condition: The expenditures were incurred after the period of performance, possibly due to timing of invoicing. There was insufficient monitoring or review to ensure that all expenses were properly charged within the approved period. Potential Effect of Condition: The following are the potential effect based on the findings noted above: a. Non-Compliance: The Organization is at risk of non-compliance with the funding agreement, which may lead to questioned costs or repayment obligations. b. Financial Oversight Risk: Continued occurrence may indicate a lack of internal controls ensuring compliance with grant period requirements. Questioned Cost: $56,017.62 Recommendation: We recommend the following: a. Implement a monitoring process to ensure that all costs are incurred within the approved period of performance. b. Document and maintain a checklist of allowable expenses by period to prevent future occurrences of similar issues. Description of the Nature and Extent of Issues Reported: All expenditures outside the period of performance were identified during testing. The total known questioned cost is $56,017.62, which exceeds the $25,000 threshold for reporting under 2 CFR §200.516(a)(3). Management Response: Management concurred with the finding. During the current fiscal year, the Organization has implemented additional controls to ensure that all grant funding is expended within the timeframe allotted

2025-001 – Significant Deficiency– Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance Requirement(s): Period of Performance and Reporting ALN 21.027 U.S. Department of the Treasury Criteria: The District was a subrecipient of Ohio’s K-12 School Safety Grant Program. Under Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR §§200.77 and 200.309 require that all costs be incurred within the grant’s period of performance, and §200.344 mandates liquidation of obligations by the specified deadlines, which were December 31, 2023 for encumbrances and September 30, 2024 for liquidation. For reporting, §§200.302(b) and 200.328 require accurate financial and programmatic reporting to the pass-through entity. Condition: The District liquidated $72,970 in expenditures after September 30, 2024, which was beyond the grant’s period of performance. In addition, quarterly reports did not accurately reflect the timing of expenditures, resulting in discrepancies between reported and actual activity between quarters. Context: Our testing focused on expenditures near the end of the performance period and included a review of all four quarterly reports. Multiple reports contained errors in the timing of reported expenditures compared to actual disbursements. Cause: The District lacked controls to prevent expenditures beyond the grant’s performance period and did not have adequate review procedures for quarterly reporting. Effect: The questioned costs may be subject to disallowance, creating a potential liability for the District. Inaccurate financial reporting also increases the risk of improper drawdowns, misinformed oversight, and potential impact on future funding decisions. Questioned Costs: $72,970 Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the District establish and enforce controls to ensure all expenditures are incurred and liquidated within the grant’s period of performance, implement a documented review process for quarterly grant reporting that includes reconciliation to the general ledger prior to submission, and develop a documented training schedule to ensure staff understand Uniform Guidance requirements for compliance with period of performance and reporting. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s response in the District’s Corrective Action Plan.

Criteria 2 CFR section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs. Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following criteria to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the recipient or subrecipient. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. For example, a cost must not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for State and local governments and Indian Tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See §§ 200.300 through 200.309. (h) Administrative closeout costs may be incurred until the due date of the final report(s). If incurred, these costs must be liquidated prior to the due date of the final report(s) and charged to the final budget period of the award unless otherwise specified by the Federal agency. All other costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. At its discretion, the Federal agency is authorized to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods. See § 200.308(g)(3). 10th Edition Procurement Manual issued by the District in September 2023, Chapter 8 – What to Do When Item or Services Are Received A. Online Goods Receipts Prior to entering an online Goods Receipt (GR), schools and offices must have a copy of the vendor invoice and Purchase Order (PO). They are responsible for verifying the accuracy of the order and entering the “online receiver” into SAP immediately after delivery of materials. Partial receiving is acceptable to account only for materials actually received. Payments are processed based on materials that have been received online. F.1. Payment for Materials Accounts Payable will process payment when the following three items are matched in SAP: (1) Purchase Order, (2) Goods Receipt, and (3) vendor invoice. F.2.c. Contracted Professional Services Accounts Payable will process payments for contracted professional services when the following four items are matched: executed contract/amendment, Purchase Order, vendor invoice, and approved authorization for payment. F.3. Contract Close-Out Upon contract expiration or termination, the District must ensure all deliverables have been received, final invoices paid, indirect costs settled, and any unspent funds unencumbered and transferred to the appropriate District account. Condition As part of our review of cash disbursement expenditures, we selected a statistically valid sample of forty (40) cash disbursement transactions from each of the following programs: Title I, Title IV, and Perkins. We reviewed the supporting documentation for these transactions to determine whether the expenditures were allowable under program regulations, accurately charged to the programs, and appropriately supported in accordance with 2 CFR Section 200.403 and the District Procurement Manual. Title I: From the $3,265,728 sample tested (out of $48,286,535 total disbursements), we identified one (1) purchase order with a variance between the Goods Receipt (GR) and vendor invoice (IR) amounts. This discrepancy resulted in an overstatement of reported expenditures by $21,394. The District subsequently corrected this by reversing the amount to the expenditure accounts in FY 2026. Title IV: From the $560,572 sample tested (out of $9,999,536 total disbursements), we identified one (1) purchase order with a variance between the GR and IR amounts, resulting in an overstatement of reported expenditures by $94,500. The District subsequently corrected this by reversing the amount to the expenditure accounts in FY 2026. Perkins: Additionally, from a $329,432 sample (out of $5,738,606 total disbursements), we identified seven (7) disbursements totaling $868 that lacked adequate proof of delivery of materials. Supporting documentation, such as signed delivery receipts or equivalent evidence of goods received, was not available for these transactions. Cause and Effect These conditions occurred because adjustments were not made to the GR amounts to reflect changes in goods or services received after the initial recording. The unadjusted GR balances led to variances between the GR and IR amounts, resulting in overstatements of reported expenditures for the affected programs. In addition, the lack of adequate proof of delivery of materials occurred because GR were entered without supporting documentation to substantiate that the materials were received. This increased the risk of payment for goods not received, misstatement of expenditures, and noncompliance with federal cost documentation requirements under 2 CFR section 200.403(g). Questioned Costs • Title I (AL No. 84.010): $21,394 overstated due to GR-IR variance. • Title IV (AL No. 84.424A): $94,500 overstated due to GR-IR variance. • Perkins (AL No. 84.048): $868 lacked sufficient supporting documentation that the goods were received. Recommendation We recommend that the District: 1. Strengthen review and reconciliation procedures to ensure that adjustments to the Goods Receipt (GR) are made promptly to reflect actual goods or services received. 2. Enforce documentation controls to require that all Goods Receipts are supported by adequate proof of delivery (e.g., signed delivery receipts, receiving reports, or equivalent evidence) before processing payments. 3. Provide staff training on documentation and reconciliation requirements to ensure compliance with federal cost principles and the District Procurement Manual.

Finding 2025-048 Compliance with Period of Performance for the Highway Safety Cluster The objective of the federal National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Highway Traffic Safety Grant Programs (Highway Safety Cluster) is to provide a coordinated national highway safety program to reduce traffic crashes, deaths, injuries, and property damage. Non-federal entities apply for federal Highway Safety Cluster funds to add or improve safety features on highways and roads around the country. A condition of receiving these federal dollars is that the recipient must comply with various rules on how and when the money can be spent. The recipient must also establish and maintain effective internal controls to ensure compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. One of these requirements is that the Department must spend the funds within the period of performance identified in the grant award. For Fiscal Year 2025, the periods of performance for the Department’s grant awards for this program were each 4-year periods, as follows: October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2026; October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2027; and October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2028; depending on the year of grant funding. The Department requires a minimum of two staff that are a different reviewer and approver for all costs charged to the grant. Expenditures charged to the grant are reviewed and entered into the Department’s enterprise resource planning system, Systems, Applications, and Products in Data Processing (SAP), by grant coordinators, and then reviewed and approved by the Department’s headquarters business office staff. Grant coordinators that provide a first-level review of the grant expenditures entered into SAP and the Department’s headquarters business office staff should all be knowledgeable in allowable costs and period of performance requirements for the Highway Safety Cluster. What was the purpose of our audit work and what work was performed? The purpose of our audit work was to determine whether: the Department had adequate internal controls over federal period of performance requirements for the Highway Safety Cluster; the Department recorded Highway Safety Cluster expenditures during the approved period of performance for the Highway Safety Cluster during Fiscal Year 2025; and costs were allowable under the grant. As part of our audit work, we selected all seven expenditure transactions charged to the Highway Safety Cluster grant during the first 30 calendar days of the period of performance for the four grant awards in place during Fiscal Year 2025. For example, for the Fiscal Year 2025 grant awards, the beginning date of the period of performance was October 1, 2024, so we reviewed expenditures charged to the grant from October 1 through October 30, 2024. We reviewed the Department’s supporting documentation to support the date each expense was incurred and evidence of internal controls related to approval of the expense. Another purpose of our audit work was to determine whether the Department implemented our Fiscal Year 2024 audit recommendations to: • Enforce its existing policies and procedures that require that grant expenditures be allowable, and that two individuals review the related supporting documentation for compliance with grant requirements. This should include monitoring to ensure that Department personnel performing the reviews review the related supporting documentation for incurred dates in order to verify that expenditures comply with the applicable award period of performance; adjustments should be made for any expenditures charged to an award outside the proper period of performance. • Provide additional training to Department personnel on period of performance compliance requirements. The Department agreed with these recommendations and planned to implement them by June 2025. How were the results of the audit work measured? We measured the results of our audit work against the following requirements: • Federal regulations [2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)] state that a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or passthrough entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. A budget period represents the specific time frame approved by the federal awarding agency for using grant funds. • The Department’s internal control procedures over federal expenditure approval and processing require that all federal grant expenditures must have adequate supporting documentation, such as an invoice, purchase order, or reimbursement request, included with the transaction and the supporting documentation must be reviewed for allowability under the applicable federal grant program by two individuals. What problems did the audit work identify? Based on our audit work, we determined that the Department did not fully comply with the period of performance requirements for the Highway Safety Cluster during Fiscal Year 2025 and did not fully implement our prior audit recommendations. Based on our audit testwork, 2 of the 7 transactions selected for testing (29 percent) had expenses recorded to the grant that were incurred outside the period of performance; each expense was incurred one day prior to the start of the period of performance. We further verified with the Department that the expenditures were not specifically authorized by the federal awarding agency to be charged to the grant. These errors resulted in questioned costs totaling $347. Why did these problems occur? This problem occurred because the Department’s internal controls were not operating effectively to ensure that expenditures charged to the Highway Safety Cluster were incurred within the award’s period of performance. Specifically, the Department’s reviewers of the transactions for which the problems occurred did not ensure the transactions were fully within the period of performance. Both transactions related to employee reimbursements of travel expenses for the period September 30, 2024 through October 4, 2024. The Department’s reviewers did not identify that the expenses for September 30, 2024 should have been charged to a different grant award, and the Department did not split the invoice into two transactions to allocate the expenses to the appropriate grant award based on the period of performance of those grant awards. Department personnel did not appear to be sufficiently trained on the Highway Safety Cluster’s period of performance compliance requirements. Why do these problems matter? By failing to properly record expenditures to the Highway Safety Cluster within the grant award’s period of performance, the Department risks its costs being deemed unallowable by the federal awarding agency. See "Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs" for table/chart. Recommendation 2025-048 The Department of Transportation (Department) should ensure that it complies with federal Highway Safety Cluster grant period of performance requirements by: A. Enforcing its existing policies and procedures that require that grant expenditures be allowable, and that two individuals review the related supporting documentation for compliance with grant requirements. This should include ensuring that Department personnel performing the reviews review the related supporting documentation for incurred dates in order to verify that expenditures comply with the applicable award period of performance and making adjustments for any expenditures charged to an award outside the proper period of performance. B. Providing training to Department personnel to ensure that staff understand and can apply the period of performance requirements. Response Department of Transportation A. Agree Implementation Date: April 2026 The Department agrees with the recommendation. The Center for Accounting (CFA) and the Office of Transportation Safety (OTS) have coordinated to implement updated reviews and controls. This implementation involves reviewing current processes to ensure supporting documentation is vetted and grant compliance is verified prior to payment. It also includes assessing the need for increased monitoring to ensure initial program reviews are complete and accurate. This remediation effort was finalized on June 30, 2025, following the September 2024 transaction in question. Additionally, the Department plans to review the remediation plan with all relevant staff again this season. This will ensure that all supporting documentation is thoroughly vetted and that expenditures comply with the applicable award period of performance B. Agree Implementation Date: April 2026 The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) agrees with the recommendation. The Center for Accounting (CFA) and the Office of Transportation Safety (OTS) have coordinated on its implementation. The Department has assessed and updated training for staff responsible for reviewing and approving invoices for Highway Safety Cluster grants, with a specific focus on the period of performance. This training plan will be revisited and reviewed with all staff involved by April 2026.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84,027, 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number: H027A240076 Pass-Through Agency: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Pass-Through Number: 240-000558-2025-0131 Award Period: November 15, 2024 through June 30, 2026 Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs / Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matter Criteria or specific requirement: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award's period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition and Context: Four (4) of four expenditures in our statistically valid sample were charged to the grant but incurred outside of the period of performance. Questioned costs: Known & Likely: $27,874 Cause: Procedures were not in place to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant program were incurred within the period of performance in the grant award. Effect: Noncompliance with federal compliance requirements occurred. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be implemented to ensure that charges to the grant program are incurred within the period of performance included in the grant award. Views of responsible officials: We have reviewed the finding and have since implemented controls to ensure that expenditures are charged to a grant only after final approval has been issued in the grant portal. In this instance, the grant was submitted in a timely manner, and DESE provided comments that were addressed by the Hingham Public Schools grant writer. However, formal final approval had not yet been issued by DESE in the grant portal at the time the expenditures were posted to the grant.

2025-003 Material Weakness in Internal Control over Period of Performance: Costs Charged Outside the Period of Performance Identification of federal programs: Federal Agency: Department of Commerce (DOI) ALN: 11.438 Pacific Coast Salmon Recovery Pacific Salmon Treaty Program Award: NA20NMF4380258 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.309, a non-Federal entity may charge to a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the approved period of performance. Costs incurred outside the approved period of performance are not allowable unless explicitly authorized by the federal awarding agency. Condition: During testing of expenses, the auditors noted one expense that was individually significant related to a grant with a performance period ended on June 30, 2025. The expense was paid out in April 2025 consisted of a prepayment of a contract amount, of which management believed would be completed by the end of the performance period. Management was unable to provide documentation demonstrating the follow-up that the related services were performed or costs were incurred during the approved period of performance. Cause: Management did not have adequate internal controls in place to ensure that contract expenses charged to the federal award were supported by documentation demonstrating that costs were incurred within the approved period of performance. In this specific case, the contract was originally intended to be administered and paid through a subawardee; however, the payment was ultimately made directly by the Organization. While the Organization did receive documentation of work to be done, it didn’t receive documentation supporting progress, services performed, and work completed. Effect or potential effect: Because sufficient documentation was not available to demonstrate that the prepaid contract costs were incurred during the approved period of performance, the expenditure is considered unallowable and questioned. This represents noncompliance with federal program requirements applicable to a major program. Questioned Costs: $65,438 Context: During testing of compliance for the period of performance, one instance showed a prepayment of contracted services. Upon further inquiry and review it was noted that the Organization had no further documentation supporting the dates of services performed nor had confirmation that services had been performed by June 30, 2025, the requirement grant ending performance date, been obtained. Identification of Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendations: We recommend that management implement stronger controls over contract payments charged to federal awards to ensure that expenditures are supported by documentation demonstrating that costs are incurred within the approved period of performance. Management should also consult with the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to determine the appropriate resolution of the questioned costs. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

2025-001 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were charged to the grants for invoices with service dates prior to the start of the grant period and payroll and related benefits earned prior to the start of the grant period. Cause: Two grants were approved approximately three weeks after the start of the school year. Effect: The School expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $26,586 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes; finding 2024-003 Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are within the period of performance for each award. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . 2 CFR 200.309 states: “A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in §200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.” 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: “….If the obligation is for – a) Acquisition of real or personal property…. The obligation is made – On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property.” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster program and Period of Performance compliance requirements. Cause: Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect: If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with non-federal funding. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During fiscal year 2023-24, the School Corporation was a member of Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01 and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the sample of five transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the two identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. This issue was isolated to fiscal year 2024. No costs incurred outside of the period of performance were identified in fiscal year 2025. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management has agreed with the finding and prepared a corrective action plan.

Finding 2025-001: Period of Performance and Allowability Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Division: National Institutes of Health Federal Program: Research and Development (R&D) Cluster (ALN 93.866) Federal Award Year: September 15, 2017 – May 31, 2024 Federal Award Number: R01AG057725 Criteria Section 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.309, states that costs charged to a federal award must be incurred during the approved period of performance. Section 2 CFR 200.403, indicates that costs must be allowable under Federal awards. CFR 200.303, states the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition, including proper perspective We sampled 50 University R&D procurement transactions aggregating $5,834,093 and identified one instance where the vendor was paid despite the services not being performed and outside the federal award’s period of performance. Costs in the amount of $286,140 were determined to be unallowable and outside of the period of performance. Total procurement expenditures within the University’s R&D program aggregated $166,760,329. Cause and Effect The control in place over period of performance was not operating at a level of precision to prevent or detect non-compliance. There was insufficient review and monitoring of vendor invoices by the departmental management to ensure that costs were incurred within the approved period of performance which resulted in costs being incurred on the award after the period of performance ended. Questioned Costs There are known questioned costs of $468,555, inclusive of $286,140 direct costs and $182,415 indirect costs. Sampling The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding in the Prior Year No. Recommendation We recommend that the University reinforce its policies and internal controls over grant expenditure review. Specifically, expenditures should be verified for compliance with the grant period of performance and confirmation that services were performed. Periodic training for staff responsible for grant administration is also recommended. Views of Responsible Officials The University accepts this finding and has removed the questioned costs from the award. Management will reinforce and reiterate our internal controls around 2 CFR 200 to the staff. Management will provide targeted 2 CFR 200 training to the impacted department.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01, 22619-047-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.309 states: “A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in §200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.” 34 CFR 76.707 states in part: “….If the obligation is for – a) Acquisition of real or personal property…. The obligation is made – On the date on which the State or subgrantee makes a binding written commitment to acquire the property.” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Special Education Cluster program and Period of Performance compliance requirements. Cause: Management had established an initial obligation date that occurred in September of the second fiscal year but modified the final vendor for payment. The new obligation occurred after the period in which the School Corporation was allowed to incur the expense. Effect: If funds are not obligated by the end of the specified date, the grantor agency is not obligated to reimburse the School Corporation for costs incurred. This may indicate that the funding reimbursed that was incurred outside of the period of performance will need to be repaid to the grantor agency, and the School Corporation will then need to support the costs with non-federal funding. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: During fiscal year 2023-24, the School Corporation was a member as well as the fiscal agent of Cooperative School Services (Cooperative). The Cooperative operated the special education programs and spent the federal money on behalf of its member schools. As the grant agreement was between the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) and each member school, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Cooperative. For Special Education Cluster awards, funds must be obligated during the 27 months, extending from July 1 of the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated through September 30 of the second following fiscal year. When testing transactions occurred in the liquidation period for the 22611-047-PN01, 22611-047-ARP, 22619-047-PN01 and 22619-047-ARP grant awards, two exceptions were identified in the initial sample of five transactions. When expanding the sample, a third exception was noted, and it was concluded that it would not be appropriate to examine the remaining 14 transactions. For the above listed awards, costs must be obligated by September 30, 2023. For the three identified exceptions, an initial purchase order was made in September, but the ultimate transaction was paid to a separate vendor than the original purchase order, and this obligation was incurred in November 2023. This issue was isolated to fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls to ensure that no costs are incurred after the September 30 deadline and to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management has agreed with the finding and prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2025-006 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Period of Performance Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-148-PN01, 22611-148-ARP, 22619-148-PN01, 22619-148-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls to ensure transactions made with the special education grant funding occurred within the appropriate period of performance. Claims for the special education programs were paid without an appropriate level of review or oversight to ensure the expenditures charged to each grant were within the allowed time frame. Although the reimbursement requests submitted to the Indiana Department of Education were prepared and approved by two different employees, the School Corporation was unable to provide evidence of this review and approval process, which may have included a review of the costs included on each request to verify they were within the correct period of performance. Reimbursement requests lacked supporting documentation of the disbursements for the Special Education Grant. Detailed reports were not retained by the School Corporation to verify the vendor, payroll, and payroll benefits occurred during the period of performance. Due to comingling of funds, a total of $176,037 of disbursements charged to the 5200 IDEA Special Education Grant fund could not be directly tied to grant awards (22611-148-PN01, 22611-148-ARP, 22619-148-PN01, and 22619-148-ARP) to determine if these disbursements were in the allowed period of performance of each grant award. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance was a systemic issue throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 32 GRIFFITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.1 states in part: ". . . Financial obligations, when referencing a recipient's or subrecipient's use of funds under a Federal award, means orders placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions that require payment. . . . Period of performance means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. Identification of the period of performance in the Federal award per § 200.211(b)(5) does not commit the awarding agency to fund the award beyond the currently approved budget period. . . . Unliquidated financial obligations means, for financial reports prepared on a cash basis, financial obligations incurred by the non-Federal entity that have not been paid (liquidated). . . ." 2 CFR 200.309 states: "If a Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity approves an extension, or if a recipient extends under § 200.308(e)(2), the Period of Performance will be amended to end at the completion of the extension. If termination occurs, the Period of Performance will be amended to end upon the effective date of termination. If a renewal award is issued, a distinct Period of Performance will begin." Cause Due to turnover of staffing in both the Special Education personnel and the School Corporation's administrative office, the School Corporation's management had not developed nor implemented a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreements and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. The School Corporation had not filed reimbursement requests in a timely manner. Effect The failure to establish an effective system of internal controls placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs We identified $176,037 in known questioned costs as noted above in the Condition and Context. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 33 GRIFFITH PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls, which includes ensuring grant expenditures are obligated and liquidated timely to ensure compliance with the grant agreement and the Period of Performance compliance requirement. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number: H027A240103 Pass-Through Agency: New Hampshire Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 20230519, 20241089, 20250423 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A nonfederal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition and Context: Two (2) of eight (8) transactions tested were incurred outside of the period of performance. Questioned costs: Below the reportable threshold. Cause: Procedures were not in place to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant program were incurred within the period of performance in the grant award for all applicable transactions. Effect: Noncompliance with federal requirements occurred. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be strengthened to ensure that charges to the grant program are incurred within the period of performance included in the grant award. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number: SLFRP1134 Pass-Through Agency: New Hampshire Governor’s Office for Emergency Relief and Recovery Pass-Through Number(s): Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: A nonfederal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). Specifically regarding SLFRF, recipients must obligate program funds by December 31, 2024. Condition and Context: A portion of the City’s SLFRF expenditures related to revenue loss were spent on the provision of government services. As part of the audit of the SLFRF grant, the City provided us with an initial list of expenditures related to revenue loss. We identified that some of the expenditures were not obligated by December 31, 2024. Subsequently, in accordance with question 17.19 of the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Frequently Asked Questions dated April 29, 2025, the City re-allocated some of the expenditures related to revenue loss. The re-allocated expenditures met period of performance requirements (i.e., they were all obligated by December 31, 2024). Questioned costs: None Cause: Procedures were not in place to ensure that all expenditures initially charged to the grant program were obligated by December 31, 2024 (subsequently corrected as identified above). Effect: Noncompliance with federal requirements initially occurred (subsequently corrected as identified above). Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend procedures be strengthened to ensure that charges to the grant program are obligated and/or incurred within the period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Finding 2025-002: Noncompliance with OMB Compliance Supplement; Period of Performance (H) for Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 93.958 Block Grants for Community Mental Health Services Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h) states “a non-Federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award's period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entities.” Costs incurred before or after the period of performance are unallowable unless explicitly approved. Condition: During our testing of expenditures charged to ALN 93.958, we identified 2 transactions out of a total sample of 15 totaling $192 that were incurred outside of the award’s period of performance. Cause and Effect: The Center did not have the controls in place to perform a review of service dates to ensure they fell within the authorized period of performance. The effect of this condition increases the possibility that expenditures are unallowable per the grant being charged to the Federal program. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $192 Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be in place to ensure accurate reporting. A formal review process should be established to ensure compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.173 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H173A240089 and 2024 Pass-Through Agency: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Numbers: 25033401 Award Period: July 1, 2024 – September 30, 2026 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR §200.403 and §200.309) requires that costs charged to a federal award be incurred during the approved period of performance and be allowable, allocable, and reasonable for the federal program. Costs incurred before the start date of the award period are not allowable unless specifically authorized by the federal awarding or pass-through agency. Condition/Context: During testing of expenditures charged to the Special Education Cluster, it was noted that one of three transactions tested were incurred and charged to the federal program prior to the beginning of the approved period of performance. Questioned Costs: $4,157.27 Cause: The Board did not have sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that expenditures charged to federal awards were reviewed for period-of-performance allowability prior to posting and payment. Effect: Charging expenditures incurred outside the approved period of performance increases the risk of unallowable costs, potential repayment to the pass-through or federal awarding agency, and noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Board strengthen internal controls over federal grant expenditure by implementing procedures to ensure costs are incurred within the approved period of performance prior to being charged to federal awards. This should include enhanced supervisory review, system controls where feasible, and training for staff responsible for grant accounting and compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: The Board concurs with the finding.

2025-001 Improve Oversight Over Period of Performance of Federal Awards (Material Weakness) Federal Agency: Department of Education Cluster/Program: Special Education Cluster AL Number(s): 84.027/84.173 Award Year: 2025 Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding Material Noncompliance Internal Control over Compliance – Material Weakness Criteria or Specific Requirement A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context During our review of 40 of the 281 invoices charged to the special education grant, we noted one instance where an invoice for special education transportation was charged to the 2025 grant year, however, a portion of these services occurred prior to the period of performance of the 2025 grant. This was not a statistically valid sample. Cause The Town has not established adequate procedures to ensure expenditures are expended within the authorized period of performance. Effect or Potential Effect Due to the weakness in internal control noted above, there are known and questioned costs reported related to contracted services incurred prior to the period of performance and charged to the grant, which could impact future grant funding. Questioned Costs The questioned costs associated with the portion of the invoice that occurred outside the authorized period of performance is $86,611. Recommendation The Town should implement controls to ensure that no costs are charged to a grant prior to the authorized period of performance. Views of Responsible Official Management agrees with the finding. Planned Corrective Action Management’s corrective action plan is included at the end of this report after the schedule of prior year findings.

Reference Number: 2025-007 Prior Year Finding: 2024-010 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor State Agency: Vermont Department of Labor Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Assistance Listing Number: 17.225 Award Number and Year: 25A55UI000119 (10/1/2024 – 12/31/2027) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) charged costs to the federal grant prior to the allowable start of the period of performance and expenditures were missing evidence of approval prior to issuance of payment. Context: Nine of sixty transactions selected for testing were charged to the award before the allowable period of performance. The grant award start date was October 1, 2024, but costs were incurred in August and September 2024. Two of sixty transactions selected for testing were missing evidence of review and approval prior to issuance of the payment. Cause: The Department’s procedures and internal controls were not operating sufficiently to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award’s period of performance nor that payments were reviewed and approved prior to issuance. Effect: Unallowable costs were charged to the program. Questioned costs: $2,267, which represents the total incurred before the allowable period of performance. Recommendation: We recommend the Department review and enhance its procedures and controls to ensure that, prior to charging costs to the program, they are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance and that payments are reviewed and approved by a supervisor who has knowledge of costs that are allowable under the program. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Finding 2025-002: (Significant Deficiency) AL#84.048: Career and Technical Education Basis Grants to States, U.S. Department of Education, Award No. V048A240016, Passed through the Kansas State Board of Education Condition: During testing of allowable expenditures and period of performance we identified five transactions totaling $3,485 that were charged to the grant before the period of performance start date. Criteria or Specific Requirement: According to 2 CFR 200.308 and 200.309, a Non-Federal entity may charge a Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the approved period of performance, unless the Federal awarding agency authorizes pre-award costs or other exceptions. Questioned Costs: $3,485 is known questioned costs. One transaction was related to stipend reimbursements, through additional review of stipend payment service dates as noted in the payroll system, 3 other stipend payments totaling $1,988 are likely questioned costs. Context: One transaction was identified during allowable expenditure testing. A $675 stipend for June 2024 services provided was charged to the grant award with a period of performance start date of July 1, 2024. We tested a total of 60 items in the allowable expenditure testing. Four transactions were identified during period of performance testing. A $90 travel reimbursement for the last week of June 2024 was charged to the grant award with a period of performance start date of July 1, 2024. We tested a total of 10 travel reimbursements. The other three transactions were incurred prior to July 1, 2024 totaled $2,720 related to a Reallocation Grant Award of $11,766 with a period of performance of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. The total period of performance sample was 55 items. The sample sizes were determined based upon guidelines provided by the AICPA which is not a statistically valid sample. Cause: This program had turnover in the current year and with year-end system cut-off dates, these items were incorrectly charged to the wrong grant year. Effect: Costs incurred outside the period of performance may be unallowable, which could result in questioned costs and potential repayment to the Federal awarding agency. Recommendation: We recommend when there is staff turnover that training is provided related to the period of performance and how to identify which grant year is appropriate for each expenditure. Additionally, a secondary review should be completed to ensure transactions are properly charged to the correct grant year. Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): The District acknowledges the finding. The Budget Department will implement a training process for all internal budget analysts as well as Career and Technical Education (CTE) program managers and business office staff on the requirements of 2 CFR 200.308 and 200.309, focusing on the “Period of Performance” and allowable cost principles. Additionally, the Budget Department will establish both a quarterly and year-end reconciliation process where the CTE assigned budget analyst will compare all expenditures against the authorized period of performance dates listed in the Perkins V Local Grant Handbook and specific grant award terms.

Reference Number: 2025-021 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services State Department Name: Department of Health and Social Services State Division: Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance Federal Program: Children’s Health Insurance Program Assistance Listing Number: 93.767 Award Number and Year: SAI000005399 (10/1/2023 – 9/30/2024) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirement Compliance: A non-Federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition The Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance (Division) was unable to provide evidence that expenditures were incurred during the grant’s allowable period of performance. Context Forty disbursement transactions recorded during September and October 2024 were selected for testing. For forty of forty transactions selected, the Division was unable to provide documentation that the costs were incurred during the grant’s period of performance. Cause The Division’s procedures and internal controls were not operating sufficiently to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award’s period of performance. Effect Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended and/or obligated outside of the allowable period of performance. Questioned Costs Undetermined. Recommendation The Division should review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it maintains documentation that expenditures charged to the program are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials To prevent recurrence, we are implementing the following actions: 1. Enhanced Monitoring Controls o Establish a centralized tracking system for all awards, including start and end dates. 2. Staff Training and Accountability o Conduct mandatory training for program and finance staff on compliance with period of performance requirements. o Assign clear responsibility for monitoring award timelines to designated personnel. 3. Pre-Closeout Review Process o Introduce a formal pre-closeout review 60 days before the award end date to identify and resolve outstanding obligations. o Require certification from both program and finance leads confirming that all expenditures fall within the allowable period. 4. Post-Expenditure Review o Perform monthly reconciliation of expenditures against the period of performance. o Immediately flag and correct any discrepancies identified.

Finding 2025-002: Subrecipient Payments Federal Agency: Department of Justice Federal Program: Second Chance Act Community-based Reentry Program Assistance Listing Number: 16.812 Number and Year: 15PBJA-23-GK-05505-SCAX - 2025; 15PBJA-23-GG-05285-SCAX - 2025 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2026 Compliance Requirement Affected: Cash management Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement Title 2 CFR Section 200.309 requires that costs, including subrecipient payments, charged to a Federal award be incurred during the award’s period of performance. Condition For one of the eight subrecipient disbursements selected, costs for subrecipient services that were performed outside of the applicable period of performance were charged to the Federal program. Questioned costs $10,487 Context There was a breakdown in TASC's internal controls over cutoff of expenses which caused an unallowable expense based on timing of work performed to be included in the SEFA. Cause Established internal controls to ensure the recognition of subrecipient costs within the proper period of performance were not consistently followed. Effect Costs outside of the period of performance could be inappropriately charged to the Federal program, which did occur in this case resulting in questioned costs. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that TASC follow its established procedures for charging allowable expenses to the grant during the period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with this finding. Management will follow established procedure to make sure costs are recorded in the proper period. Management will review the procedure with all accounting staff.

Period of Performance – Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance ALN 10.557 WIC Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Condition: WIC expenditures are charged to the oldest open WIC grant regardless of when specific costs are incurred. WIC expenditures are comingled and are not tracked separately by each grant. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.309, costs charged to a federal award must be incurred during the approved period of performance and supported by adequate records to demonstrate allocability to the specific grant period. Effect: The lack of grant-level tracking between grant periods increases the risk that costs could be charged to an incorrect grant period, increasing the risk of fraud, error, or omission in grant administration. Questioned Costs: Utilizing cutoff testing between specific ending grant periods, our testing identified $166,317 in questioned costs. Cause: The City lacks procedures and system controls to track WIC expenditures by individual grant award and period of performance. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement procedures to ensure WIC expenditures are tracked and supported by individual grant period. This may include maintaining details for each individual grants or enhancing existing processes to ensure expenditures are charged to the appropriate period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials: See the City’s Corrective Action Plan.

Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 and 93.527 Federal Award Identification Number: H80CS00824-24 Award Periods: May 1, 2025 – April 30, 2026 Type of Finding: Immaterial noncompliance and significant deficiency in internal control over compliance Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.309, federal award recipients may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the approved period of performance. The auditee is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control procedures to ensure expenditures charged to federal programs are incurred within the approved grant period. Condition: We noted the Organization did not have a formal process to review expenditures charged to federal programs to ensure they were incurred within the applicable period of performance. Specifically, management did not maintain documentation or a monitoring process to verify that expenditures recorded near the beginning or end of the grant period were incurred within the authorized period of performance. Questioned Costs: $6,504 Context: Seven (7) and of the eleven (11) transactions selected for testing related to expenditures incurred outside the period or performance. Cause: The Organization did not have a formal policy and procedure to closely review the expense charged to the grant during the first and last months of the grant period. Effect: Without adequate controls over period of performance, there is an increased risk that expenditures could be charged to federal awards outside the approved grant period. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a comprehensive and thorough process to review and monitor expenditures charged near the beginning and end of grant periods to ensure the expenditures incurred are within the authorized federal award grant period.

Criteria: The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) allow non-Federal entities to request advance payments, provided that the timing and amount of such advances are limited to the entity’s immediate cash needs and that funds are expended only for allowable costs incurred within the approved period of performance. Under cash management requirements, advance payments must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and timed to align with the actual, immediate cash requirements of the non-Federal entity (2 CFR §200.305(b)(1); 2025 OMB Compliance Supplement, Cash Management). Additionally, regarding the period of performance, federal awards may only be charged for obligations incurred during the approved period of performance stated in the Notice of Award, and costs incurred outside that period are considered unallowable unless specifically authorized by the federal awarding agency (2 CFR §200.309; 2025 OMB Compliance Supplement, Period of Performance). Condition: During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, NeoMed Center requested and received advance payments through the Payment Management System (PMS) under the Health Center Program (93.224). The advances included funds related to a grant budget period running from May 2025 through April 2026; however, management intended to use a portion of these funds to support operations in the subsequent fiscal year (July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026). As of June 30, 2025, a portion of the advanced federal funds had not been expended for allowable costs incurred within the applicable period of performance. While advance payments are permitted under federal regulations, the timing of the drawdowns exceeded NeoMed Center Inc.’s immediate cash needs for allowable expenditures incurred during the approved period of performance. Effect: As a result of this condition, federal funds were drawn earlier than necessary relative to allowable expenditures as of and for the yar ended June 30, 2025 and were held to be expended and recorded as revenues in the next fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. This situation exposed NMCI to an increased risk of noncompliance with federal cash management and allowability requirements. Additionally, cash balances as of June 30, 2025, included federal funds that were not eligible to be recognized as expenditures as of that date. Cause: Management stated that the advance payments were requested as a preventive measure in response to uncertainty related to federal funding disruptions during calendar year 2025. However, lack of internal controls to ensure that advance drawdowns were limited only to immediate cash needs and aligned with the applicable grant period of performance permitted excess drawdown with no support. Recommendations: We recommend that the Institution implement the following corrective actions: 1. Strengthen internal controls over federal cash management and grant expenditure monitoring to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. 2. Revise policies and procedures manuals and Implement procedures to ensure that advance drawdowns from the Payment Management System (PMS) are limited to the entity’s immediate cash needs. 3. Ensure that federal funds are drawn only for allowable expenditures expected to be incurred within the approved period of performance. 4. Provide training to relevant personnel on federal cash management requirements and the proper administration of advance payments.

Federal Agency: 11 – Department of Commerce, 12 – Department of Defense, 15 – Department of the Interior, 16 – Department of Justice, 43 – National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 47 – National Science Foundation, 81 – Department of Energy, 84 – Department of Education, 93 – Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: R&D Cluster and TRIO Cluster Assistance Listing Number: R&D and 84.TRIO Award Period: July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.403(a), costs charged to Federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable to the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR §200.309 requires costs to be incurred during the approved period of performance of the Federal award. Further, 2 CFR §200.302(a) requires non‑Federal entities to maintain financial management systems that provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award, and 2 CFR §200.303 requires non‑Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards. Condition/Context: The population sizes below are presented only for programs in which exceptions were identified for the applicable compliance test. Cash Disbursement Testing – TRIO Cluster (Control Finding Only): • For 2 of the 40 TRIO samples tested, the related expenses were allowable and incurred within the awards’ approved periods of performance; however, the expenses were improperly recorded in fiscal year 2025. Specifically, 1 expense related to fiscal year 2024, and 1 expense represented a prepayment for a fiscal year 2026 cost. The resulting misstatement to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) totaled $5,260, which is less than program materiality. Payroll Testing – R&D Cluster (Control Finding Only): • For 10 of the 40 R&D samples tested, timesheets were not submitted timely, resulting in variances between the payroll register and the recalculated gross wages for the applicable pay periods. No unallowable payroll costs were identified; however, controls over timely payroll documentation and reconciliation did not operate effectively. • For 1 of the 40 R&D samples tested, the timesheet was not signed by the supervisor, indicating that payroll review controls were not consistently applied. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Although the costs tested were allowable and incurred within the approved periods of performance, improper period recognition and untimely or incomplete payroll documentation increase the risk that Federal expenditures are not recorded in the proper fiscal period and that Federal financial reporting is not accurate. Cause: The UEC’s internal controls were not designed or implemented to consistently ensure that expenditures are recorded in the proper fiscal period and that payroll documentation is submitted, reviewed, and approved timely. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the UEC strengthen its controls over expenditure recognition to ensure costs are recorded in the appropriate fiscal period and enhance payroll review procedures to ensure timesheets are submitted and reviewed timely to support accurate payroll reporting. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to correct the finding.

FINDING 2025-005 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2023-005. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 22 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) grant was established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act to respond to the Coronavirus outbreak and assist schools in creating healthy learning environments, return students to classrooms, and address local needs. The ESF grant was further funded by the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA) Act and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act. The School Corporation did not have effective internal controls in place over the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirement. A sample of 13 payroll claims paid from the School Corporation's ESF grant were selected for testing. Of the sample, 6 employee pay rates could not be verified to a School Board-approved, allowable hourly pay rate for a high dosage tutor position. High dosage tutors were paid anywhere from $20 to $77 an hour. The School Corporation was unable to provide documentation that the School Board approved a pay rate for the high dosage tutor positions during the audit period. The total amount paid to high dosage tutors during the audit period was $472,354, which were considered questioned costs. In addition, the School Corporation paid a consulting firm to provide general support to the finance department. The expenditures were deemed unallowable as there was no documentation available that the consultants were assisting the School Corporation in preventing, preparing for, and responding to COVID-19. The total amount expended to the consultant during the audit period was $514,156, which were considered questioned costs. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the costs noted above for the ESSER II and ESSER III grants. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 23 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.403 states in part: "Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the recipient or subrecipient. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. For example, a cost must not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for State and local governments and Indian Tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. See § 200.306(b). (g) Be adequately documented. See §§ 200.300 through 200.309. (h) Administrative closeout costs may be incurred until the due date of the final report(s). If incurred, these costs must be liquidated prior to the due date of the final report(s) and charged to the final budget period of the award unless otherwise specified by the Federal agency. All other costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. At its discretion, the Federal agency is authorized to waive prior written approvals to carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent budget periods. See § 200.308(g)(3). 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1) states in part: "Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities (for IHE, this per the IHE's definition of IBS); . . . (vii) Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 24 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.404 states: "A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non- Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: (a) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award. (b) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm's-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award. (c) Market prices for comparable goods or services for the geographic area. (d) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government. (e) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award's cost." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L. No. 116-260, 134 Stat. 1924 (2020) states in part: "For an additional amount for "Education Stabilization Fund".to remain available through September 30, 2022, to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically, or internationally . . ." Cause Payroll records were incomplete as the School Corporation was unable to provide documentation that all rates of pay were approved by the School Board. The School Corporation did not include the consultants above in the budget submitted as part of the grant application, and so the School Corporation did not get the required prior approval for the purchases. Effect Without proper documentation, the allowability of the ESF grant expenditures cannot be substantiated, creating a risk that unallowable costs may be charged to the federal grant. Additionally, we could not determine how the expenditures met the purpose of the program. Questioned Costs We identified $986,510 in known questioned costs as described above in the Condition and Context. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 25 MICHIGAN CITY AREA SCHOOLS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommend that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure rates of pay are approved by the School Board and adequately documented and that costs are allowable. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Item 2025-003 - Period of Performance - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Center Program Cluster (Assistance Listing Number 93.224/93.527) Notice of Award Number 6 H80CS00505-23-04, 6 H2ECS45602-02-04, 1 H8LCS50772-01-00 and 6 H8HCS46163-03-01 - (Material Weakness) Criteria: Per the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR Part 200), specifically §200.77 and §200.309, costs must be incurred during the period of performance stated in the federal award. The HRSA Notice of Award for Section 330 grants also explicitly defines the budget period and restricts reimbursement to allowable costs incurred within the said timeframe. Statement of Condition: During our audit, we noted that LBUCC drew down $190,688 of federal grant funds under the Section 330 program for the budget period beginning June 1, 2024 to reimburse salary expenses incurred in May 2024. Cause: LBUCC did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that expenses reimbursed under the Section 330 grant aligned with the grant’s defined period of performance, which resulted in salary costs incurred prior to the start of the budget period to be improperly included in the drawdown request. Effect: Failure to draw funds for eligible expenses incurred within the period of performance expose LBUCC to potential repayment obligations or restrictions on future grant funding. Questioned Costs: None. Although LBUCC drew down $190,688 of salaries incurred in May 2024 from the budget period that began on June 1, 2024, LBUCC still had more than $190,688 worth of salaries of employees who worked on the Health Center Program Cluster but have not been charged to the Health Center Program Cluster. Since LBUCC is able to replace the May 2024 salaries with salaries that were incurred within the program period we do not deem that there is any questioned cost in relation to this finding. Context: There are 67 employees whose salaries were incurred in May 2024 and charged to the budget period that began June 1, 2024. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that LBUCC implement procedures to ensure that all drawdowns are supported by expenses incurred strictly within the grant’s approved period of performance and train staff on grant compliance requirements. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding and will implement these measures to strengthen their grant management practices and to prevent future noncompliance.

Finding 2025.003 – Period of Performance – Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number 14.267 - Continuum of Care, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Services, Pass-Through Entity: State of Connecticut Department of Housing, Award Number: 24DOH0901CX, Pass-Through Entity: United Way of Southeastern Connecticut, Award Number: 21DOH1001DA Criteria A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award's period of performance that was authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections, 200.308, 200.309 and 200.403(h)). Condition Certain expenses were charged to the grant that were not properly obligated prior to the end of the grant period. Purchase orders were issued without placing the actual order, or the item was ordered after the period of performance concluded. Cause The Council did not have adequate policies, procedures and controls in place to ensure compliance with the requirements regarding period of performance. Effect or Potential Effect Inadequate controls over period of performance led to expenses charged to the grant that were not incurred during the required period of performance. Questioned Costs $2,113 Context We selected 5 expenditures for testing over the period of performance requirement. Out of the 5 expenditures tested, we noted 2 instances where expenditures were not spent or obligated appropriately in the right grant period. Identification as a Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation We recommend that management implement additional controls and policies over period of performance. Staff who purchase items with grant funds should have additional training on period of performance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials TVCCA recognizes the validity of this finding. TVCCA is strengthening its period-of-performance controls by training all staff with purchasing authority, and finance staff, on grant deadlines, obligation definitions, and allowable spend-down periods. Internal controls will be enhanced by incorporating quarterly cutoff testing into the month-end close checklist. Additionally, cutoff testing results will be monitored quarterly as part of the quarter-end review process.

Condition: During our audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we identified certain instances where costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year's federal awards. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(g) requires that costs must be "determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.309 states that "a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance." Cause: Management indicated that year-end processing procedures did not adequately identify and properly allocate expenses to the appropriate period. Effect: Improper period allocation of costs resulted in inaccurate financial reporting of federal award expenditures and potential violation of period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: It is recommended that management implement enhanced review procedures for period-end expenses to ensure a proper cutoff, develop a monitoring system to track expenses by period of performance, and a establish a forma process for review and approval of payments made near the end of a reporting period. Views of responsible officials: Management of the Organization concurs with the finding and has implemented a corrective action plan to address the identified deficiency.

Condition: During our audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we identified certain instances where costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year's federal awards. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(g) requires that costs must be "determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.309 states that "a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance." Cause: Management indicated that year-end processing procedures did not adequately identify and properly allocate expenses to the appropriate period. Effect: Improper period allocation of costs resulted in inaccurate financial reporting of federal award expenditures and potential violation of period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: It is recommended that management implement enhanced review procedures for period-end expenses to ensure a proper cutoff, develop a monitoring system to track expenses by period of performance, and a establish a forma process for review and approval of payments made near the end of a reporting period. Views of responsible officials: Management of the Organization concurs with the finding and has implemented a corrective action plan to address the identified deficiency.

Condition: During our audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we identified certain instances where costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year's federal awards. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(g) requires that costs must be "determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.309 states that "a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance." Cause: Management indicated that year-end processing procedures did not adequately identify and properly allocate expenses to the appropriate period. Effect: Improper period allocation of costs resulted in inaccurate financial reporting of federal award expenditures and potential violation of period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: It is recommended that management implement enhanced review procedures for period-end expenses to ensure a proper cutoff, develop a monitoring system to track expenses by period of performance, and a establish a forma process for review and approval of payments made near the end of a reporting period. Views of responsible officials: Management of the Organization concurs with the finding and has implemented a corrective action plan to address the identified deficiency.

Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 6/1/24-5/31/25 Type of Finding: Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: A nonfederal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: Cost incurred prior to the start of the period of performance were charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $2,979 Context: Two of thirteen transactions selected for testing. Cause: These costs related to a payroll period which crossed over two different grant budget periods, and the costs allocated to the grant were not prorated for the number of days within the period of performance. Effect: Unallowable costs may be allocated to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that only costs incurred during the period of performance be charged to the grant. For payroll in which pay periods extend over multiple budget periods, we recommend prorating the amount charged to the grant by the days worked within the grant period. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 6/1/24-5/31/25 Type of Finding: Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: A nonfederal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: Cost incurred prior to the start of the period of performance were charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $2,979 Context: Two of thirteen transactions selected for testing. Cause: These costs related to a payroll period which crossed over two different grant budget periods, and the costs allocated to the grant were not prorated for the number of days within the period of performance. Effect: Unallowable costs may be allocated to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that only costs incurred during the period of performance be charged to the grant. For payroll in which pay periods extend over multiple budget periods, we recommend prorating the amount charged to the grant by the days worked within the grant period. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Condition: During our audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we identified certain instances where costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year's federal awards. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(g) requires that costs must be "determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.309 states that "a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance." Cause: Management indicated that year-end processing procedures did not adequately identify and properly allocate expenses to the appropriate period. Effect: Improper period allocation of costs resulted in inaccurate financial reporting of federal award expenditures and potential violation of period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: It is recommended that management implement enhanced review procedures for period-end expenses to ensure a proper cutoff, develop a monitoring system to track expenses by period of performance, and a establish a forma process for review and approval of payments made near the end of a reporting period. Views of responsible officials: Management of the Organization concurs with the finding and has implemented a corrective action plan to address the identified deficiency.

Condition: During our audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we identified certain instances where costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year's federal awards. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(g) requires that costs must be "determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.309 states that "a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance." Cause: Management indicated that year-end processing procedures did not adequately identify and properly allocate expenses to the appropriate period. Effect: Improper period allocation of costs resulted in inaccurate financial reporting of federal award expenditures and potential violation of period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: It is recommended that management implement enhanced review procedures for period-end expenses to ensure a proper cutoff, develop a monitoring system to track expenses by period of performance, and a establish a forma process for review and approval of payments made near the end of a reporting period. Views of responsible officials: Management of the Organization concurs with the finding and has implemented a corrective action plan to address the identified deficiency.

Condition: During our audit of federal award expenditures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, we identified certain instances where costs incurred in prior periods were improperly charged to the current year's federal awards. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(g) requires that costs must be "determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.309 states that "a non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance." Cause: Management indicated that year-end processing procedures did not adequately identify and properly allocate expenses to the appropriate period. Effect: Improper period allocation of costs resulted in inaccurate financial reporting of federal award expenditures and potential violation of period of performance requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: It is recommended that management implement enhanced review procedures for period-end expenses to ensure a proper cutoff, develop a monitoring system to track expenses by period of performance, and a establish a forma process for review and approval of payments made near the end of a reporting period. Views of responsible officials: Management of the Organization concurs with the finding and has implemented a corrective action plan to address the identified deficiency.

Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 6/1/24-5/31/25 Type of Finding: Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: A nonfederal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: Cost incurred prior to the start of the period of performance were charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $2,979 Context: Two of thirteen transactions selected for testing. Cause: These costs related to a payroll period which crossed over two different grant budget periods, and the costs allocated to the grant were not prorated for the number of days within the period of performance. Effect: Unallowable costs may be allocated to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that only costs incurred during the period of performance be charged to the grant. For payroll in which pay periods extend over multiple budget periods, we recommend prorating the amount charged to the grant by the days worked within the grant period. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Health Centers Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224/93.527 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: 6/1/24-5/31/25 Type of Finding: Compliance and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: A nonfederal entity may only charge allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: Cost incurred prior to the start of the period of performance were charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $2,979 Context: Two of thirteen transactions selected for testing. Cause: These costs related to a payroll period which crossed over two different grant budget periods, and the costs allocated to the grant were not prorated for the number of days within the period of performance. Effect: Unallowable costs may be allocated to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that only costs incurred during the period of performance be charged to the grant. For payroll in which pay periods extend over multiple budget periods, we recommend prorating the amount charged to the grant by the days worked within the grant period. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Finding Number: 2024-003 Federal Program: CDBG – Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year: B-22-MC-39-0001, 2024 Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 14.218 Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through Entity: None Repeat Finding: No Material Weakness and Noncompliance – Period of Performance Criteria: A non-Federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity sections 2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: The City charged costs that were incurred prior to the beginning of the period of performance of the grant. Questioned Costs: Total of $44,198 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed: Total known questioned costs of $22,110, and total projection of $22,088 for a total of $44,198. Context: During testing, we identified three operational journals with transactions that were incurred outside of the period of performance of the grant. The requirement is outlined in the funding approval/agreement and applicable guidelines referenced above. Cause and Effect: The City did not have internal controls in place to ensure that only costs that occurred within the period of performance were charged to grant. As a result, the City charged costs that were incurred prior to the start of the grant’s period of performance. Recommendation: The City should implement controls and processes to ensure costs are charged within the appropriate grant period. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: See Corrective Action Plan.

Compliance Requirement Allowable Costs and Allowable Activities Type of Finding Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance, Material Noncompliance Program Port Security Grant Program ALN # 97.056 Federal Agency Department of Homeland Security – Direct Award Federal Award Year 2021 and 2023 Grant Numbers EMW-2021-PU-00030- IJ#3 EMW-2023-PU-00164- IJ#4 Questioned Costs $209,855 Criteria - Federal rules require that grant funds be spent only on allowable and necessary costs that are directly related to the purpose of the award. For the Port Security Grant Program (PSGP), this means expenditures must match the projects described in the approved Investment Justification (IJ). In addition, all costs must be incurred within the official grant period; expenses made before or after the authorized performance dates are not permitted. Uniform Guidance establishes clear requirements for allowability of costs under federal awards: • 2 CFR 200.403 – Costs must be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and consistently treated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. • 2 CFR 200.405 – Costs must be directly allocable to the federal award in proportion to the benefits received. • 2 CFR 200.403(c) and 200.404 – Costs must conform to limitations or exclusions set forth in the award documents and applicable federal regulations. • 2 CFR 200.309 – A non-federal entity may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance, unless specifically authorized otherwise.Condition - Testing of 50 invoices identified significant noncompliance. Fourteen (14) invoices represented expenditures that were not aligned with the approved Investment Justification (IJ), indicating that funds were used for purposes outside the scope of the grant award. In addition, one (1) invoice reflected costs incurred prior to the authorized period of performance, in direct violation of federal grant requirements. a) Expenditures were charged to the 2021 PSGP for the purchase of camera equipment, installation, and project management activities that lacked support within the approved Investment Justification No. 3 MSOC Security Sustainment Costs, resulting in questioned costs of $78,910. b) Expenditures were charged to the 2023 PSGP for the purchase of computer equipment, conference room enhancements, and biological and cultural survey that lacked support within the approved Investment Justification No. 3 GIS Acquisition and Implementation, resulting in questioned costs of $115,044 c) Expenditures were charged to the 2023 PSGP for the purchase of executive leadership training and datto backups that lacked support within the approved Investment Justification No. 4 Sustainment for Cybersecurity Network and IT Systems, resulting in questioned costs of $15,901Cause - The District failed to implement and enforce adequate internal controls to ensure that expenditures were reviewed and validated against both the approved Investment Justification and the grant’s period of performance prior to authorization. This lack of oversight reflects a breakdown in management’s responsibility for compliance with federal grant requirements. Effect - Because the District did not ensure expenditures were properly reviewed against the approved Investment Justifications and the authorized period of performance, a total of $209,855 in questioned costs was identified. These unallowable expenditures increase the risk that federal grantor agencies may require repayment or disallowance of costs, and indicate material noncompliance with federal grant requirements. The lack of adequate review and oversight also undermines accountability for federal funds, creating heightened risk of waste, abuse, and additional future noncompliance. Recommendation - The District must implement and enforce formal review procedures requiring all PSGP expenditures to be cross-checked against the approved Investment Justification (IJ) and verified for compliance with the grant’s period of performance prior to payment. No disbursement of federal funds should occur until documentation demonstrates that the expenditure directly aligns with the approved grant scope and timing. The District must consult with FEMA regarding the allowability of identified questioned costs.

2024-010 Period of Performance Assistance Listing No.: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program Condition: The Organization was unable to demonstrate consistent controls over the period of performance requirement. Criteria: The requirements for the period of performance are contained in 2 CFR section 200.1 Definitions for “budget period,” “financial obligations,” “period of performance,” 2 CFR section 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 2 CFR section 200.309 (modifications to period of performance), 2 CFR section 200.344 (closeout), program legislation, federal awarding agency regulations; and the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs. Cause: The Organization did not have good controls on ensuring the period of performance requirement was met due to staff turn over. Effect: The Organization could have incurred grant expenditures outside the grant period. Perspective: Two of forty items selected for testing did not have documentation of the control over compliance with the period of performance requirement. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. See finding 2023-014. Based on timing of prior year audit the Organization did not have time to fully correct the issue. Recommendation: In order to prevent future occurences of this deficiency, RBT recommends that management expand controls to ensure that they are able to demonstrate that all expenses meet their procurement policy. Auditee's Response: The Organization agrees with the finding. See attached corrective action plan.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.