2024 – 003 Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Assistance Listing Number: 93.568 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: G-2402LLIEA 6/1/2024; 2302ILLIEI 3/1/2023; G 2302ILLIEA 10/1/2022 Pass-Through Agency: Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Pass-Through Numbers: 23-221038; 23-274038; 23-224038 Award Period: June 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025; March 1, 2023 through August 31, 2024; October 1, 2022 through August 31, 2024 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.303) requires non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Uniform Grant Guidance (2 CFR 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)) requires that only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance be charged to the award. Effective internal controls should include procedures that involve costs charged to federal awards being reviewed and approved for proper period of performance. Condition: The County charged costs to the federal award after the end of the period of performance. Furthermore, although payroll transactions charged to the federal award were reviewed and approved, documentation of such review was not retained. Questioned Costs: $706 Context: 4 of 97 transactions tested were incurred after the period of performance end date. All 18 payroll transactions tested lacked documentation of review and approval. Cause: Costs were inadvertently claimed outside the period of performance. Documentation of review and approval for payroll transactions was also not retained. Effect: Charging costs outside the period of performance can result in unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, which could lead to noncompliance with federal requirements and potential repayment obligations. Repeat Finding: The finding is a repeat of a finding in the prior year. The prior year finding number was 2023-005. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) 2024 – 003 Period of Performance (Continued) Recommendation: We recommend that the County review and strengthen its internal controls to ensure that only costs incurred within the period of performance are charged. Costs charged to federal awards should be reviewed and approved for proper period of performance, and documentation of such review should be retained. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2024-007 – Allowable Costs & Period of Performance (Material Weakness and Noncompliance) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education, Higher Education- Institutional Aid (Title III), Assistance Listing No. 84.031 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E establishes cost principles to apply in determining costs under federal awards. Non-federal entities are also required to establish controls over the disbursement process to ensure compliance with allowable cost requirements. In addition, a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition: We selected a sample of 25 non-payroll disbursements and 25 payroll disbursements charged to the grant. Of the 25 non-payroll, 4 were missing an approval by the Director of Title III Programs and 4 costs were not in the applicable budgets. In addition, 2 were charged to a fund code for a grant period that ended September 30, 2023. There were 44 pay checks tested in the sample of 25; of those 44, 31 exceptions were noted as having an issue around the approved pay rate documentation. In 9 instances, there was no documented approved pay rate, only support provided was a local salary schedule for multiple positions for 6 of the exceptions. In 15 instances, there was no approval for salary to be charged to the grant number and documentation showed unrestricted, a different account or offer letter had no Title III documentation. In 7 instances, the approved pay rate did not agree to actual paycheck report. Cause: The College did not obtain proper approval by the Director of the program, expenses did not fit into the grant budget line items, approved pay rates were not properly documented and the College continued to use funds after the grant period ended based on verbal instruction. Effect: The College’s grant disbursements were not properly approved. Questioned Costs: $35,461 Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures surrounding payroll and non-payroll grant disbursements to ensure controls are functioning and compliant with federal regulations Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
2024-002 Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Requirements (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Agency for International Development Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Assistance Listing Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Grant Award Number(s): Direct Award Number Award Period 720BHA22GR00225 May 13, 2022 through May 10, 2024 720BHA22GR00127 April 15, 2022 through April 14, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 ‐ Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the COSO. In accordance with 2 CFR §200. 308, 200.309, and 200.403(h), a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: During our testing of the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements, we identified one disbursement sample out of a total of twenty-five disbursement samples tested wherein management charged the federal program on June 2024 when the transaction happened on December 2022. In particular, the inventory distribution in the amount of $4,258.53 that took place in December 2022 should have been recorded as an expense in fiscal year 2023 rather than in fiscal year 2024. In addition, during our testing of period of performance compliance requirements, we also noted another inventory distribution in the amount of $235.89 that took place on August 2023 but it was only recorded on June 2024. The expenditures are allowable and within the period of performance, however, the controls over timely reconciliation and recording the inventory distributions did not occur in the appropriate reporting period. Questioned Costs: There are no known or likely questioned costs. Context: This is a condition based on testing of CRS’s compliance with specified requirements. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. Cause: Delays in performing the reconciliation and timely recording of inventory distributions in certain CRS country offices were caused by personnel’s unfamiliarity with the use of the new Supply Chain Management system, a system used in inventory management. Effect: Failure to timely reconcile and record transactions in the correct accounting period results in incorrect SEFA reporting to the U.S. government. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure timely reconciliation of inventory distributions in order to record the transactions in the correct accounting period. In addition, management should conduct appropriate training to CRS country office personnel with the proper use of the Supply Chain Management system to ensure timely reconciliation and recording of inventory distributions. Views of Responsible Officials: CRS management agrees with the finding and recommendations and will enhance the inventory reconciliation processes.
2024-002 Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Requirements (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Agency for International Development Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Assistance Listing Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Grant Award Number(s): Direct Award Number Award Period 720BHA22GR00225 May 13, 2022 through May 10, 2024 720BHA22GR00127 April 15, 2022 through April 14, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 ‐ Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the COSO. In accordance with 2 CFR §200. 308, 200.309, and 200.403(h), a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: During our testing of the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements, we identified one disbursement sample out of a total of twenty-five disbursement samples tested wherein management charged the federal program on June 2024 when the transaction happened on December 2022. In particular, the inventory distribution in the amount of $4,258.53 that took place in December 2022 should have been recorded as an expense in fiscal year 2023 rather than in fiscal year 2024. In addition, during our testing of period of performance compliance requirements, we also noted another inventory distribution in the amount of $235.89 that took place on August 2023 but it was only recorded on June 2024. The expenditures are allowable and within the period of performance, however, the controls over timely reconciliation and recording the inventory distributions did not occur in the appropriate reporting period. Questioned Costs: There are no known or likely questioned costs. Context: This is a condition based on testing of CRS’s compliance with specified requirements. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. Cause: Delays in performing the reconciliation and timely recording of inventory distributions in certain CRS country offices were caused by personnel’s unfamiliarity with the use of the new Supply Chain Management system, a system used in inventory management. Effect: Failure to timely reconcile and record transactions in the correct accounting period results in incorrect SEFA reporting to the U.S. government. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure timely reconciliation of inventory distributions in order to record the transactions in the correct accounting period. In addition, management should conduct appropriate training to CRS country office personnel with the proper use of the Supply Chain Management system to ensure timely reconciliation and recording of inventory distributions. Views of Responsible Officials: CRS management agrees with the finding and recommendations and will enhance the inventory reconciliation processes.
2024-003 Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Period of Performance Requirement (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Number: 10.612 Assistance Listing Name: USDA Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement Program Grant Award Number: Direct Award Number Award Period LRP-686-2019/015-00-A October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 ‐ Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the COSO. In accordance with 2 CFR §200. 308, 200.309, and 200.403(h), a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: During our testing of the period of performance compliance requirements, we identified two disbursement samples for a total of $1,574.09 out of a total of twenty-five disbursement samples tested wherein management was unable to provide evidence that the expenditures charged to the program were valid and incurred within the appropriate period of performance. Management also subsequently concluded that these transactions should have been captured as inventory and not charged as expenditure to the federal program. Questioned Costs: $1,574.09 from our samples. Context: This is a condition based on testing of CRS’s compliance with specified requirements. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. The total amount of the twenty-five samples selected for testing was $62,914. Cause: CRS country office personnel did not adhere to CRS’s documented policies and procedures for ensuring only valid and allowable expenses are charged to the federal program within the appropriate period of performance. Effect: Without adequate internal controls in place to ensure costs are properly reviewed for allowability and appropriate period of performance, CRS could be noncompliant with the allowability and period of performance requirements and could request funds for costs that are unallowed. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management follow its own policies, procedures and controls to ensure that the inventory expenses charged to the federal program are allowable within the period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials: CRS management agrees with the finding and recommendations and will enhance processes around inventory expense allowability.
Condition: During our audit, we noted the Agency incurred expenditures and charged a federal award outside the approved period of performance for the grant. Criteria: Under 2 CFR Part 200.309, non-federal entities may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance Costs incurred outside this period are not allowable unless prior written approval is obtained from the awarding agency. Cause: The Agency accrued an expenditure in its accounting system and did not verify that the expenditure was for a service date within the approved period of performance. Effect: The federal award was overbilled by $1,904. Recommendation:We recommend the Agency more carefully monitor expenditures incurred near grant end dates to ensure compliance with period of performance compliance requirements. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding and will more carefully monitor grant end dates to comply with period of performance compliance requirements.
Federal Program: AL 20.237 – High Priority Commercial Motor Vehicle Grant Program, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Cluster. Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance. Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Internal Control Over Noncompliance. Criteria: Per guidance provided by Section 7.5 of the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program – Grant Comprehensive Policy, 49 U.S. Code § 31104(f)(2), and 200 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Section 200.309, only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance specified in the Notice of Grant Award may be charged to the related federal award. Condition and Context: On September 30, 2023, IRP prepaid $174,465 for data repository hosting and maintenance services that were not incurred until the quarter ended December 31, 2023. IRP reported this expenditure in Reports SF-425 and requested its reimbursement on form SF-270, for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, and charged the amount to federal award FM-MP- 0580-21. As expenditure occurred during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, it should be charged to federal award FM-MHP-0762-23, which has a period of performance from September 1, 2023, to September 30, 2025 per review of the notice of grant award. Questioned Costs: $174,465. Cause: Management lacked the appropriate knowledge of the period of performance requirements specified by the federal awarding agency and Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: This error resulted in a $174,465 charge to award FM-MP-0580-21 for services that were incurred outside of the period of performance. Recommendation: We recommend management implement pre-submission controls, such as requiring date validation for all expenses against the award's period of performance and providing training to educate staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitations. We understand management has alerted FMCSA to the error and intends to work with them to correct the reporting of these expenditures, upon submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse of the data collection form and single audit reporting package for the year ended September 30, 2024. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and concurs with the recommendation. Grant management procedures have been revised to verify that services are received and costs incurred within the authorized period of performance in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403 before the costs are charged to a federal award. Staff involved in grant management will receive targeted training on 2 CFR requirements related to period-ofperformance compliance and allowable cost timing.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding 2024-007 – Allowable Costs & Period of Performance (Material Weakness and Noncompliance) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education, Higher Education- Institutional Aid (Title III), Assistance Listing No. 84.031 Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E establishes cost principles to apply in determining costs under federal awards. Non-federal entities are also required to establish controls over the disbursement process to ensure compliance with allowable cost requirements. In addition, a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition: We selected a sample of 25 non-payroll disbursements and 25 payroll disbursements charged to the grant. Of the 25 non-payroll, 4 were missing an approval by the Director of Title III Programs and 4 costs were not in the applicable budgets. In addition, 2 were charged to a fund code for a grant period that ended September 30, 2023. There were 44 pay checks tested in the sample of 25; of those 44, 31 exceptions were noted as having an issue around the approved pay rate documentation. In 9 instances, there was no documented approved pay rate, only support provided was a local salary schedule for multiple positions for 6 of the exceptions. In 15 instances, there was no approval for salary to be charged to the grant number and documentation showed unrestricted, a different account or offer letter had no Title III documentation. In 7 instances, the approved pay rate did not agree to actual paycheck report. Cause: The College did not obtain proper approval by the Director of the program, expenses did not fit into the grant budget line items, approved pay rates were not properly documented and the College continued to use funds after the grant period ended based on verbal instruction. Effect: The College’s grant disbursements were not properly approved. Questioned Costs: $35,461 Recommendation: We recommend the College strengthen its policies and procedures surrounding payroll and non-payroll grant disbursements to ensure controls are functioning and compliant with federal regulations Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
2024-002 Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Requirements (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Agency for International Development Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Assistance Listing Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Grant Award Number(s): Direct Award Number Award Period 720BHA22GR00225 May 13, 2022 through May 10, 2024 720BHA22GR00127 April 15, 2022 through April 14, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 ‐ Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the COSO. In accordance with 2 CFR §200. 308, 200.309, and 200.403(h), a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: During our testing of the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements, we identified one disbursement sample out of a total of twenty-five disbursement samples tested wherein management charged the federal program on June 2024 when the transaction happened on December 2022. In particular, the inventory distribution in the amount of $4,258.53 that took place in December 2022 should have been recorded as an expense in fiscal year 2023 rather than in fiscal year 2024. In addition, during our testing of period of performance compliance requirements, we also noted another inventory distribution in the amount of $235.89 that took place on August 2023 but it was only recorded on June 2024. The expenditures are allowable and within the period of performance, however, the controls over timely reconciliation and recording the inventory distributions did not occur in the appropriate reporting period. Questioned Costs: There are no known or likely questioned costs. Context: This is a condition based on testing of CRS’s compliance with specified requirements. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. Cause: Delays in performing the reconciliation and timely recording of inventory distributions in certain CRS country offices were caused by personnel’s unfamiliarity with the use of the new Supply Chain Management system, a system used in inventory management. Effect: Failure to timely reconcile and record transactions in the correct accounting period results in incorrect SEFA reporting to the U.S. government. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure timely reconciliation of inventory distributions in order to record the transactions in the correct accounting period. In addition, management should conduct appropriate training to CRS country office personnel with the proper use of the Supply Chain Management system to ensure timely reconciliation and recording of inventory distributions. Views of Responsible Officials: CRS management agrees with the finding and recommendations and will enhance the inventory reconciliation processes.
2024-002 Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Requirements (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Agency for International Development Assistance Listing Number: 98.001 Assistance Listing Name: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas Grant Award Number(s): Direct Award Number Award Period 720BHA22GR00225 May 13, 2022 through May 10, 2024 720BHA22GR00127 April 15, 2022 through April 14, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 ‐ Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the COSO. In accordance with 2 CFR §200. 308, 200.309, and 200.403(h), a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: During our testing of the activities allowed or unallowed and allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements, we identified one disbursement sample out of a total of twenty-five disbursement samples tested wherein management charged the federal program on June 2024 when the transaction happened on December 2022. In particular, the inventory distribution in the amount of $4,258.53 that took place in December 2022 should have been recorded as an expense in fiscal year 2023 rather than in fiscal year 2024. In addition, during our testing of period of performance compliance requirements, we also noted another inventory distribution in the amount of $235.89 that took place on August 2023 but it was only recorded on June 2024. The expenditures are allowable and within the period of performance, however, the controls over timely reconciliation and recording the inventory distributions did not occur in the appropriate reporting period. Questioned Costs: There are no known or likely questioned costs. Context: This is a condition based on testing of CRS’s compliance with specified requirements. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. Cause: Delays in performing the reconciliation and timely recording of inventory distributions in certain CRS country offices were caused by personnel’s unfamiliarity with the use of the new Supply Chain Management system, a system used in inventory management. Effect: Failure to timely reconcile and record transactions in the correct accounting period results in incorrect SEFA reporting to the U.S. government. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management ensure timely reconciliation of inventory distributions in order to record the transactions in the correct accounting period. In addition, management should conduct appropriate training to CRS country office personnel with the proper use of the Supply Chain Management system to ensure timely reconciliation and recording of inventory distributions. Views of Responsible Officials: CRS management agrees with the finding and recommendations and will enhance the inventory reconciliation processes.
2024-003 Internal Controls over Compliance and Compliance with Period of Performance Requirement (Significant Deficiency) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Number: 10.612 Assistance Listing Name: USDA Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement Program Grant Award Number: Direct Award Number Award Period LRP-686-2019/015-00-A October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Auditee requirements contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D ‐ Post Federal Award Requirements, Section 200.303 ‐ Internal Controls, requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with a framework such as the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the COSO. In accordance with 2 CFR §200. 308, 200.309, and 200.403(h), a non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Condition: During our testing of the period of performance compliance requirements, we identified two disbursement samples for a total of $1,574.09 out of a total of twenty-five disbursement samples tested wherein management was unable to provide evidence that the expenditures charged to the program were valid and incurred within the appropriate period of performance. Management also subsequently concluded that these transactions should have been captured as inventory and not charged as expenditure to the federal program. Questioned Costs: $1,574.09 from our samples. Context: This is a condition based on testing of CRS’s compliance with specified requirements. The prevalence of the finding is detailed in the condition section above. The samples were selected using a non-statistical method. The total amount of the twenty-five samples selected for testing was $62,914. Cause: CRS country office personnel did not adhere to CRS’s documented policies and procedures for ensuring only valid and allowable expenses are charged to the federal program within the appropriate period of performance. Effect: Without adequate internal controls in place to ensure costs are properly reviewed for allowability and appropriate period of performance, CRS could be noncompliant with the allowability and period of performance requirements and could request funds for costs that are unallowed. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management follow its own policies, procedures and controls to ensure that the inventory expenses charged to the federal program are allowable within the period of performance. Views of Responsible Officials: CRS management agrees with the finding and recommendations and will enhance processes around inventory expense allowability.
Condition: During our audit, we noted the Agency incurred expenditures and charged a federal award outside the approved period of performance for the grant. Criteria: Under 2 CFR Part 200.309, non-federal entities may charge to the federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance Costs incurred outside this period are not allowable unless prior written approval is obtained from the awarding agency. Cause: The Agency accrued an expenditure in its accounting system and did not verify that the expenditure was for a service date within the approved period of performance. Effect: The federal award was overbilled by $1,904. Recommendation:We recommend the Agency more carefully monitor expenditures incurred near grant end dates to ensure compliance with period of performance compliance requirements. Management Response: Management agrees with this finding and will more carefully monitor grant end dates to comply with period of performance compliance requirements.
Federal Program: AL 20.237 – High Priority Commercial Motor Vehicle Grant Program, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Cluster. Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance. Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance and Internal Control Over Noncompliance. Criteria: Per guidance provided by Section 7.5 of the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program – Grant Comprehensive Policy, 49 U.S. Code § 31104(f)(2), and 200 Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Section 200.309, only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance specified in the Notice of Grant Award may be charged to the related federal award. Condition and Context: On September 30, 2023, IRP prepaid $174,465 for data repository hosting and maintenance services that were not incurred until the quarter ended December 31, 2023. IRP reported this expenditure in Reports SF-425 and requested its reimbursement on form SF-270, for the quarter ended September 30, 2023, and charged the amount to federal award FM-MP- 0580-21. As expenditure occurred during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, it should be charged to federal award FM-MHP-0762-23, which has a period of performance from September 1, 2023, to September 30, 2025 per review of the notice of grant award. Questioned Costs: $174,465. Cause: Management lacked the appropriate knowledge of the period of performance requirements specified by the federal awarding agency and Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect: This error resulted in a $174,465 charge to award FM-MP-0580-21 for services that were incurred outside of the period of performance. Recommendation: We recommend management implement pre-submission controls, such as requiring date validation for all expenses against the award's period of performance and providing training to educate staff on 2 CFR requirements and period-of-performance limitations. We understand management has alerted FMCSA to the error and intends to work with them to correct the reporting of these expenditures, upon submission to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse of the data collection form and single audit reporting package for the year ended September 30, 2024. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and concurs with the recommendation. Grant management procedures have been revised to verify that services are received and costs incurred within the authorized period of performance in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.403 before the costs are charged to a federal award. Staff involved in grant management will receive targeted training on 2 CFR requirements related to period-ofperformance compliance and allowable cost timing.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Criteria or specific requirement: Per the 2024 OMB Compliance Supplement, "A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h))." Allowable costs must meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: Costs were booked to incorrect program codes, resulting in unsupported charges being booked to the federal program. Both payroll and non-payroll expenditures were charged to the Federal program prior to the period of performance start date. Questioned costs: Known $1,098 Context: In period of performance testing, the majority of samples tested for beginning period of performance (31/40 samples) related to June 2024 payroll. In all of these tested samples, time was booked to the Federal program prior to the program start date of June 20, 2024. Similarly, there was no adjustments for other charges that are normally booked for the full month at a time, including: per diems (2/40 samples) and fuel (1/40 samples). One additional error was related to time booked to the Federal program when no time was coded to that program during the pay period tested. The final error was related to February amortization that was not processed in time and therefore mistakenly booked to the program. In payroll testing, 2/40 samples tested were booked to a charge code that was not reflected in the supporting timesheets. The amounts booked incorrectly to the major program are considered unallowable costs. Cause: MTI payroll is run monthly. Time should not have been coded to the Federal program in question until the program start date of June 20, 2024, however as most programs begin on the first of the month (not mid-month) this was overlooked by the supervisors and finance team who are supposed to review timesheets and make correction to ensure allocations are booked to the correct programs for the correct dates. Additional errors due to human error. Effect: Costs incurred outside of the Federal program's period of performance and costs that are not supported by underlying documentation are not allowable under the program. The organization may be required to submit reimbursements for these amounts. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Management should review its existing control structure and ensure that there are adequate processes and controls to ensure only expenditures incurred during the period of performance are booked to Federal programs and that the correct program codes are charged, based on the underlying supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Period of Performance Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all expenditures are properly recorded in the applicable federal grant period in accordance with 2 CFR 200.309. Condition: In our testing of period of performance, we noted one instance of a fiscal year 2023 expenditure recorded during fiscal year 2024 and therefore not allowable under the terms of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to adequately identify period of performance requirements. Effect: A lack of internal controls over period of performance could result in recording expenditures in the improper grant period resulting in non-compliance with the provisions of applicable grant requirements. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Nonstatistical sampling was used. Sample size was 40 of 255 transactions. and included $525,686 of $828,578 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: RAED should review internal control procedures to ensure federal expenditures are being properly recorded in appropriate grant periods. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Period of Performance Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all expenditures are properly recorded in the applicable federal grant period in accordance with 2 CFR 200.309. Condition: In our testing of period of performance, we noted one instance of a fiscal year 2023 expenditure recorded during fiscal year 2024 and therefore not allowable under the terms of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to adequately identify period of performance requirements. Effect: A lack of internal controls over period of performance could result in recording expenditures in the improper grant period resulting in non-compliance with the provisions of applicable grant requirements. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Nonstatistical sampling was used. Sample size was 40 of 255 transactions. and included $525,686 of $828,578 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: RAED should review internal control procedures to ensure federal expenditures are being properly recorded in appropriate grant periods. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Period of Performance Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all expenditures are properly recorded in the applicable federal grant period in accordance with 2 CFR 200.309. Condition: In our testing of period of performance, we noted one instance of a fiscal year 2023 expenditure recorded during fiscal year 2024 and therefore not allowable under the terms of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to adequately identify period of performance requirements. Effect: A lack of internal controls over period of performance could result in recording expenditures in the improper grant period resulting in non-compliance with the provisions of applicable grant requirements. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Nonstatistical sampling was used. Sample size was 40 of 255 transactions. and included $525,686 of $828,578 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: RAED should review internal control procedures to ensure federal expenditures are being properly recorded in appropriate grant periods. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Department of Education, Passed through Minnesota Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing 84.027/84.173 Special Education Cluster Period of Performance Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: A good system of internal control includes an adequate system for ensuring all expenditures are properly recorded in the applicable federal grant period in accordance with 2 CFR 200.309. Condition: In our testing of period of performance, we noted one instance of a fiscal year 2023 expenditure recorded during fiscal year 2024 and therefore not allowable under the terms of the grant. Cause: Procedures are not in place to adequately identify period of performance requirements. Effect: A lack of internal controls over period of performance could result in recording expenditures in the improper grant period resulting in non-compliance with the provisions of applicable grant requirements. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context/Sampling: Nonstatistical sampling was used. Sample size was 40 of 255 transactions. and included $525,686 of $828,578 federal awards. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: RAED should review internal control procedures to ensure federal expenditures are being properly recorded in appropriate grant periods. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Information on the federal program: Subject: Special Education Cluster – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-122-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2 CFR 200.309 states: "A non-Federal entity may charge to the Federal award only allowable costs incurred during the period of performance (except as described in § 200.461 Publication and printing costs) and any costs incurred before the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the Federal award that were authorized by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the period of performance compliance requirement. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the period of performance requirement. The School Corporation did not have a design control in place to ensure that service provider invoices were paid before the required liquidation date. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation pays one hundred percent of its Special Education Cluster funding to one service provider. From review of the expense population, we noted 2 payments to the service provider where the service provider was not paid until after liquidation date of December 29, 2023. The School Corporation did not pay the service provider until April 30, 2024 for $258,488 for the services provided. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement procedures to ensure the invoices are paid before the required liquidation date. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-002 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Per 2 CFR section 200.343(b) grant obligations must be liquidated not later than 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were liquidated after 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Cause: The School was not aware of the 120 calendar day liquidation period. Effect: The Town expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $36,118.21 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are liquidated within 120 calendar days after the end of the grant period. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-003 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were charged to the grants for payroll and related benefits earned prior to the start of the grant period. Cause: Three grants were approved approximately sixty to ninety days after the start of the school year. Effect: The School expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $26,586 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are within the period of performance for each award. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-003 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were charged to the grants for payroll and related benefits earned prior to the start of the grant period. Cause: Three grants were approved approximately sixty to ninety days after the start of the school year. Effect: The School expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $26,586 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are within the period of performance for each award. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-003 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were charged to the grants for payroll and related benefits earned prior to the start of the grant period. Cause: Three grants were approved approximately sixty to ninety days after the start of the school year. Effect: The School expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $26,586 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are within the period of performance for each award. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-003 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were charged to the grants for payroll and related benefits earned prior to the start of the grant period. Cause: Three grants were approved approximately sixty to ninety days after the start of the school year. Effect: The School expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $26,586 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are within the period of performance for each award. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
2024-003 U.S. Department of Education Passed-through the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027 & 84.173 COVID-19 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) – ALN 84.027X Criteria: Per 2 CFR section 200.309 grant funds may only be obligated upon the date of approval by the awarding agency through the end of the grant period. Condition: Costs were charged to the grants for payroll and related benefits earned prior to the start of the grant period. Cause: Three grants were approved approximately sixty to ninety days after the start of the school year. Effect: The School expended funds outside of the period of performance which resulted in questioned costs. Questioned Costs: $26,586 Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The School should implement procedures to properly monitor award performance dates to ensure that goods and services charged to federal grants are within the period of performance for each award. Views of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2024-007 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Defense State Agency: Vermont State Military Department Federal Program: National Guard Military Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Projects Assistance Listing Number: 12.401 Award Number and Year: W912LN2421001 (10/1/2023 – 9/20/2024) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Vermont State Military Department (Department) charged costs to the federal grant prior to the allowable start of the period of performance. Context: One of five transactions selected for testing was incurred prior to the award’s period of performance. The expense was for a transaction incurred in the month of September 2023 but the award’s period of performance began on 10/1/2023. Cause: The Department’s procedures were not operating sufficiently to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award’s period of performance. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Questioned costs: Below the reportable limit. Recommendation: The Department should review and enhance its procedures and internal controls to ensure that it charges expenditures to the program that are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2024-010 Prior Year Finding: 2023-008 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor State Agency: Vermont Department of Labor Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Assistance Listing Number: 17.225 Award Number and Year: Admin 24A55UI000063 (10/1/2023-12/31/2026), DUA 23A60UD000013 (7/14/2023 - 7/14/2026) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) charged costs to the federal grant prior to the allowable start of the period of performance. Context: Sixty transactions were selected for testing and the following exceptions were noted: • Five of sixty transactions were charged to the award before the allowable period of performance. The grant award start date was October 1, 2023, but costs were incurred in July, August, and September 2023. Cause: The Department’s procedures and internal controls were not operating sufficiently to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award’s period of performance. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Questioned costs: $2,980, which represents the total incurred before the allowable period of performance. Recommendation: We recommend the Department review and enhance its procedures and controls to ensure that prior to charging costs to the program, they are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Reference Number: 2024-010 Prior Year Finding: 2023-008 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor State Agency: Vermont Department of Labor Federal Program: Unemployment Insurance Assistance Listing Number: 17.225 Award Number and Year: Admin 24A55UI000063 (10/1/2023-12/31/2026), DUA 23A60UD000013 (7/14/2023 - 7/14/2026) Compliance Requirement: Period of Performance Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: A non-federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308 200.309 and 200.403(h)). A period of performance may contain one or more budget periods. Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Department of Labor (Department) charged costs to the federal grant prior to the allowable start of the period of performance. Context: Sixty transactions were selected for testing and the following exceptions were noted: • Five of sixty transactions were charged to the award before the allowable period of performance. The grant award start date was October 1, 2023, but costs were incurred in July, August, and September 2023. Cause: The Department’s procedures and internal controls were not operating sufficiently to ensure that expenditures charged to the program were incurred within the award’s period of performance. Effect: Costs could be deemed unallowable by the awarding agency if funds are expended outside of the allowable period of performance. Questioned costs: $2,980, which represents the total incurred before the allowable period of performance. Recommendation: We recommend the Department review and enhance its procedures and controls to ensure that prior to charging costs to the program, they are incurred within an award’s allowable period of performance. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - Research and Development Cluster (R&D) Federal Award Identification Number and Year - R&D - All ALN's Pass through Entity - R&D - Various Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - A non federal entity may charge only allowable costs incurred during the approved budget period of a federal award’s period of performance and any costs incurred before the federal awarding agency or pass through entity made the federal award that were authorized by the federal awarding agency or pass through entity (2 CFR sections 200.308, 200.309, and 200.403(h)). Condition - Of the 40 samples included in our sample selected for testing in the Research and Development Cluster, the University included two invoices for a total of $2,618 that were incurred prior to the beginning of the grant period. Questioned Costs - $2,618 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Question costs were computed using the total costs identified in our sample that were incurred prior to the grant period. Context - The University completed a transfer of costs between two grant awards that were supporting the same overall program. The samples identified were part of one cost transfer, but the invoice date and related expense was incurred one day prior to the beginning of the grant period. Cause and Effect - The University did not have proper procedures over tracking of expenditures in separate grant cost centers for a R&D program. This required a transfer between the grant programs and resulted in the University adjusting costs from a prior period and charging costs to a grant that was outside the period of performance. Recommendation - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an Award Calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were included in the proper award period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - The University has implemented a new grant financial and billing software that provides improved controls over operational transactions, including an award calendar control that recognizes the award end date in the invoice posting process. The costs described in this finding, which occurred before the new system was implemented, have been removed from the existing grant and replaced by other allowable costs that were incurred within the proper award period.