Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022 001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster ? various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A 102 Common Rule (?_.21), 0MB Circular A 110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework,? issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
(2022-069) Title: Internal control over subrecipient cash management needs improvement Prior Year Findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table State Department: Health and Human Services State Bureau: Division of Contract Management Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Title: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (COVID-19) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (COVID-19) Immunization Cooperative Agreements (COVID-19) Assistance Listing Number: 93.558; 10.557; 93.268 Federal Award Identification Number: 1901METANF, 2001METANF, 2101METANF; 194ME743W5003, 204ME743W5003, 214ME743W5003, 224ME743W5003, 228ME000M2003, 214ME701W1003, 214ME701W1006, 224ME701W1003, 224ME701W1006, 214ME721W6003, 214ME721W6006, 214ME752W7003; NH23IP922604 Compliance Area: Cash management Subrecipient monitoring Type of Finding: Material weakness Material noncompliance Questioned Costs: None Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303; 2 CFR 200.305 The Department must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Department is managing awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of awards. The Department is required to monitor cash drawdowns by their subrecipients to ensure that the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized. Condition: The Department did not monitor subrecipients to ensure they were drawing Federal funds in accordance with cash management requirements. For cost-settled subawards, Department procedures include making equal advance monthly payments and then reconciling those amounts to the quarterly financial reports submitted by the subrecipient. This procedure does not take into consideration the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes. For ?cost-settled by invoice? (reimbursement) subawards, Department procedures do not require obtaining documentation to support the monthly invoices submitted by the subrecipient for costs that were already paid by the subrecipient, thus verifying it was for reimbursement and not advance payment. Context: In fiscal year 2022, the Department provided: ? $17.9 million to subrecipients from TANF grant funds of $81.9 million. TANF?s subawards are either cost-settled, cost-settled by invoice, or fee for service. ? $3.6 million to subrecipients from WIC grant funds of $15 million. All of WIC?s subawards are cost-settled. ? $2.5 million to subrecipients from Immunization Cooperative Agreements grant funds of $23 million. Immunization Cooperative Agreement?s subawards are either cost-settled or cost-settled by invoice. Cause: ? Misinterpretation of Federal regulations. 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) references that the timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the non-Federal entity. The Department interpreted this Federal requirement to mean it applied to the State; however, the requirement is directed towards non-Federal entities other than states. ? Lack of adequate subrecipient monitoring procedures. In addition to monitoring the total amount paid to subrecipients, the Department is required to monitor the timing between when the subrecipient receives Federal funds from the Department and when the subrecipient disburses those funds for program purposes. Effect: ? Noncompliance with subrecipient cash management requirements ? Federal programs may not be effectively and efficiently administered. ? The Federal government may require the implementation of more stringent subrecipient cash management procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department implement monitoring procedures to ensure that: ? the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized for cost-settled subawards. ? the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient is for reimbursement purposes, and not for advance payment, for ?cost-settled by invoice? subawards. Corrective Action Plan: See F-25 Management?s Response: The Department disagrees with this finding. The Department reviews budgeted expenses to determine their timing and nature (one time, recurring, allowability); reviews quarterly expense reports and alters payments to meet immediate cash needs, and finally, monitors subrecipient single audits to ensure there are no cash management findings. The Department?s approach is administratively reasonable and does minimize the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes given administrative and operational needs. We believe we have procedures in place that can be corroborated by the fact that our subrecipients do not receive single audit findings related to cash management. Contact: Jim Lopatosky, Director, Division of Contract Management, DHHS, 207-287-5075 Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: The subrecipient monitoring procedures outlined in Management?s Response do not ensure that subrecipients are drawing funds in accordance with Federal cash management requirements, as follows: ? Reviewing budgeted expenses is not monitoring the subrecipient?s compliance with cash management requirements as the subrecipient has not disbursed the funds yet. ? The Department does not obtain documentation to support the timing of the subrecipient?s expenditures reported on the quarterly expense reports and to substantiate compliance. ? Though reviewing the subrecipient?s Single Audits for findings is beneficial: o the Single Audit is usually completed towards the end or after the grant award period. o it is not guaranteed that cash management will be selected for testing by the subrecipient?s auditor; therefore, relying on the subrecipient?s auditor to discover cash management issues is not an adequate procedure to monitor the subrecipient?s compliance with that requirement. Therefore, the Department was noncompliant with Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.305 that requires monitoring cash drawdowns of subrecipients to ensure that the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized. The finding remains as stated. (State Number: 22-1111-04)
(2022-069) Title: Internal control over subrecipient cash management needs improvement Prior Year Findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table State Department: Health and Human Services State Bureau: Division of Contract Management Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Title: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (COVID-19) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (COVID-19) Immunization Cooperative Agreements (COVID-19) Assistance Listing Number: 93.558; 10.557; 93.268 Federal Award Identification Number: 1901METANF, 2001METANF, 2101METANF; 194ME743W5003, 204ME743W5003, 214ME743W5003, 224ME743W5003, 228ME000M2003, 214ME701W1003, 214ME701W1006, 224ME701W1003, 224ME701W1006, 214ME721W6003, 214ME721W6006, 214ME752W7003; NH23IP922604 Compliance Area: Cash management Subrecipient monitoring Type of Finding: Material weakness Material noncompliance Questioned Costs: None Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303; 2 CFR 200.305 The Department must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Department is managing awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of awards. The Department is required to monitor cash drawdowns by their subrecipients to ensure that the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized. Condition: The Department did not monitor subrecipients to ensure they were drawing Federal funds in accordance with cash management requirements. For cost-settled subawards, Department procedures include making equal advance monthly payments and then reconciling those amounts to the quarterly financial reports submitted by the subrecipient. This procedure does not take into consideration the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes. For ?cost-settled by invoice? (reimbursement) subawards, Department procedures do not require obtaining documentation to support the monthly invoices submitted by the subrecipient for costs that were already paid by the subrecipient, thus verifying it was for reimbursement and not advance payment. Context: In fiscal year 2022, the Department provided: ? $17.9 million to subrecipients from TANF grant funds of $81.9 million. TANF?s subawards are either cost-settled, cost-settled by invoice, or fee for service. ? $3.6 million to subrecipients from WIC grant funds of $15 million. All of WIC?s subawards are cost-settled. ? $2.5 million to subrecipients from Immunization Cooperative Agreements grant funds of $23 million. Immunization Cooperative Agreement?s subawards are either cost-settled or cost-settled by invoice. Cause: ? Misinterpretation of Federal regulations. 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) references that the timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the non-Federal entity. The Department interpreted this Federal requirement to mean it applied to the State; however, the requirement is directed towards non-Federal entities other than states. ? Lack of adequate subrecipient monitoring procedures. In addition to monitoring the total amount paid to subrecipients, the Department is required to monitor the timing between when the subrecipient receives Federal funds from the Department and when the subrecipient disburses those funds for program purposes. Effect: ? Noncompliance with subrecipient cash management requirements ? Federal programs may not be effectively and efficiently administered. ? The Federal government may require the implementation of more stringent subrecipient cash management procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department implement monitoring procedures to ensure that: ? the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized for cost-settled subawards. ? the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient is for reimbursement purposes, and not for advance payment, for ?cost-settled by invoice? subawards. Corrective Action Plan: See F-25 Management?s Response: The Department disagrees with this finding. The Department reviews budgeted expenses to determine their timing and nature (one time, recurring, allowability); reviews quarterly expense reports and alters payments to meet immediate cash needs, and finally, monitors subrecipient single audits to ensure there are no cash management findings. The Department?s approach is administratively reasonable and does minimize the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes given administrative and operational needs. We believe we have procedures in place that can be corroborated by the fact that our subrecipients do not receive single audit findings related to cash management. Contact: Jim Lopatosky, Director, Division of Contract Management, DHHS, 207-287-5075 Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: The subrecipient monitoring procedures outlined in Management?s Response do not ensure that subrecipients are drawing funds in accordance with Federal cash management requirements, as follows: ? Reviewing budgeted expenses is not monitoring the subrecipient?s compliance with cash management requirements as the subrecipient has not disbursed the funds yet. ? The Department does not obtain documentation to support the timing of the subrecipient?s expenditures reported on the quarterly expense reports and to substantiate compliance. ? Though reviewing the subrecipient?s Single Audits for findings is beneficial: o the Single Audit is usually completed towards the end or after the grant award period. o it is not guaranteed that cash management will be selected for testing by the subrecipient?s auditor; therefore, relying on the subrecipient?s auditor to discover cash management issues is not an adequate procedure to monitor the subrecipient?s compliance with that requirement. Therefore, the Department was noncompliant with Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.305 that requires monitoring cash drawdowns of subrecipients to ensure that the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized. The finding remains as stated. (State Number: 22-1111-04)
(2022-069) Title: Internal control over subrecipient cash management needs improvement Prior Year Findings: See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table State Department: Health and Human Services State Bureau: Division of Contract Management Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Agriculture Assistance Listing Title: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (COVID-19) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (COVID-19) Immunization Cooperative Agreements (COVID-19) Assistance Listing Number: 93.558; 10.557; 93.268 Federal Award Identification Number: 1901METANF, 2001METANF, 2101METANF; 194ME743W5003, 204ME743W5003, 214ME743W5003, 224ME743W5003, 228ME000M2003, 214ME701W1003, 214ME701W1006, 224ME701W1003, 224ME701W1006, 214ME721W6003, 214ME721W6006, 214ME752W7003; NH23IP922604 Compliance Area: Cash management Subrecipient monitoring Type of Finding: Material weakness Material noncompliance Questioned Costs: None Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303; 2 CFR 200.305 The Department must establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Department is managing awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of awards. The Department is required to monitor cash drawdowns by their subrecipients to ensure that the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized. Condition: The Department did not monitor subrecipients to ensure they were drawing Federal funds in accordance with cash management requirements. For cost-settled subawards, Department procedures include making equal advance monthly payments and then reconciling those amounts to the quarterly financial reports submitted by the subrecipient. This procedure does not take into consideration the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes. For ?cost-settled by invoice? (reimbursement) subawards, Department procedures do not require obtaining documentation to support the monthly invoices submitted by the subrecipient for costs that were already paid by the subrecipient, thus verifying it was for reimbursement and not advance payment. Context: In fiscal year 2022, the Department provided: ? $17.9 million to subrecipients from TANF grant funds of $81.9 million. TANF?s subawards are either cost-settled, cost-settled by invoice, or fee for service. ? $3.6 million to subrecipients from WIC grant funds of $15 million. All of WIC?s subawards are cost-settled. ? $2.5 million to subrecipients from Immunization Cooperative Agreements grant funds of $23 million. Immunization Cooperative Agreement?s subawards are either cost-settled or cost-settled by invoice. Cause: ? Misinterpretation of Federal regulations. 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) references that the timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the non-Federal entity. The Department interpreted this Federal requirement to mean it applied to the State; however, the requirement is directed towards non-Federal entities other than states. ? Lack of adequate subrecipient monitoring procedures. In addition to monitoring the total amount paid to subrecipients, the Department is required to monitor the timing between when the subrecipient receives Federal funds from the Department and when the subrecipient disburses those funds for program purposes. Effect: ? Noncompliance with subrecipient cash management requirements ? Federal programs may not be effectively and efficiently administered. ? The Federal government may require the implementation of more stringent subrecipient cash management procedures. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department implement monitoring procedures to ensure that: ? the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized for cost-settled subawards. ? the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient is for reimbursement purposes, and not for advance payment, for ?cost-settled by invoice? subawards. Corrective Action Plan: See F-25 Management?s Response: The Department disagrees with this finding. The Department reviews budgeted expenses to determine their timing and nature (one time, recurring, allowability); reviews quarterly expense reports and alters payments to meet immediate cash needs, and finally, monitors subrecipient single audits to ensure there are no cash management findings. The Department?s approach is administratively reasonable and does minimize the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes given administrative and operational needs. We believe we have procedures in place that can be corroborated by the fact that our subrecipients do not receive single audit findings related to cash management. Contact: Jim Lopatosky, Director, Division of Contract Management, DHHS, 207-287-5075 Auditor?s Concluding Remarks: The subrecipient monitoring procedures outlined in Management?s Response do not ensure that subrecipients are drawing funds in accordance with Federal cash management requirements, as follows: ? Reviewing budgeted expenses is not monitoring the subrecipient?s compliance with cash management requirements as the subrecipient has not disbursed the funds yet. ? The Department does not obtain documentation to support the timing of the subrecipient?s expenditures reported on the quarterly expense reports and to substantiate compliance. ? Though reviewing the subrecipient?s Single Audits for findings is beneficial: o the Single Audit is usually completed towards the end or after the grant award period. o it is not guaranteed that cash management will be selected for testing by the subrecipient?s auditor; therefore, relying on the subrecipient?s auditor to discover cash management issues is not an adequate procedure to monitor the subrecipient?s compliance with that requirement. Therefore, the Department was noncompliant with Federal regulation 2 CFR 200.305 that requires monitoring cash drawdowns of subrecipients to ensure that the time elapsing between the payment of Federal funds to the subrecipient and the subrecipient?s actual disbursement for program purposes is minimized. The finding remains as stated. (State Number: 22-1111-04)