Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.305(b)(3) states that non-federal entities must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The District's expenditure reports filed for June 30, 2024 included expenditures in the amount of $19,645 paid in July 2024. These amounts were not reported as committed or obligated. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District received federal reimbursement before expenditures were paid. Effect: The June 30, 2024 expenditure report was filed overstating expenditures by $19,645. Cause: Grant expenditures reported on the June 30, 2024 expenditure report included $19,645 of expenditures that were not paid by the District until the following year. Recommendation: Grant expenditure reports should only include expenditures that have been paid during the grant report expenditure period. Management's response: There is no disagreement with this finding, and management will monitor all future federal reimbursement requests. Committed and obligated expenditure reports will be reported appropriately, and will be paid within 90 days after project completion.
Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.305(b)(3) states that non-federal entities must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The District's expenditure reports filed for June 30, 2024 included expenditures in the amount of $19,645 paid in July 2024. These amounts were not reported as committed or obligated. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District received federal reimbursement before expenditures were paid. Effect: The June 30, 2024 expenditure report was filed overstating expenditures by $19,645. Cause: Grant expenditures reported on the June 30, 2024 expenditure report included $19,645 of expenditures that were not paid by the District until the following year. Recommendation: Grant expenditure reports should only include expenditures that have been paid during the grant report expenditure period. Management's response: There is no disagreement with this finding, and management will monitor all future federal reimbursement requests. Committed and obligated expenditure reports will be reported appropriately, and will be paid within 90 days after project completion.
Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.305(b)(3) states that non-federal entities must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The District's expenditure reports filed for June 30, 2024 included expenditures in the amount of $19,645 paid in July 2024. These amounts were not reported as committed or obligated. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District received federal reimbursement before expenditures were paid. Effect: The June 30, 2024 expenditure report was filed overstating expenditures by $19,645. Cause: Grant expenditures reported on the June 30, 2024 expenditure report included $19,645 of expenditures that were not paid by the District until the following year. Recommendation: Grant expenditure reports should only include expenditures that have been paid during the grant report expenditure period. Management's response: There is no disagreement with this finding, and management will monitor all future federal reimbursement requests. Committed and obligated expenditure reports will be reported appropriately, and will be paid within 90 days after project completion.
Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.305(b)(3) states that non-federal entities must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The District's expenditure reports filed for June 30, 2024 included expenditures in the amount of $19,645 paid in July 2024. These amounts were not reported as committed or obligated. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District received federal reimbursement before expenditures were paid. Effect: The June 30, 2024 expenditure report was filed overstating expenditures by $19,645. Cause: Grant expenditures reported on the June 30, 2024 expenditure report included $19,645 of expenditures that were not paid by the District until the following year. Recommendation: Grant expenditure reports should only include expenditures that have been paid during the grant report expenditure period. Management's response: There is no disagreement with this finding, and management will monitor all future federal reimbursement requests. Committed and obligated expenditure reports will be reported appropriately, and will be paid within 90 days after project completion.
Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200.305(b)(3) states that non-federal entities must disburse funds for program purposes before requesting payment from the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity. Condition: The District's expenditure reports filed for June 30, 2024 included expenditures in the amount of $19,645 paid in July 2024. These amounts were not reported as committed or obligated. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District received federal reimbursement before expenditures were paid. Effect: The June 30, 2024 expenditure report was filed overstating expenditures by $19,645. Cause: Grant expenditures reported on the June 30, 2024 expenditure report included $19,645 of expenditures that were not paid by the District until the following year. Recommendation: Grant expenditure reports should only include expenditures that have been paid during the grant report expenditure period. Management's response: There is no disagreement with this finding, and management will monitor all future federal reimbursement requests. Committed and obligated expenditure reports will be reported appropriately, and will be paid within 90 days after project completion.
2024-006: Return of Interest Earned on Advance Payment Cash Receipts Grantor: Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Program Title: Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) Ebola Preparedness and Response Activities Award Name: Region 3 Emerging Special Pathogen Treatment Center at The Johns Hopkins Hospital (JH Biocontainment Unit) Award Number: U3REP220674 Assistance Listing Title: Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) Ebola Preparedness and Response Activities Assistance Listing Number: 93.817 Award Year: September 30, 2023 – September 29, 2024 Passthrough Entity: None Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.305(b)(11)-(12), the auditee must maintain advance payments of Federal funds in interestbearing accounts and may retain up to $500 per year of interest earned on Federal funds to use for administrative expenses of the recipient or subrecipient. Any additional interest earned on Federal funds must be returned annually to the DHHS Payment Management System (PMS). Condition JHHS received advance payments from DHHS for the HPP award totaling $1,615,384 in October 2023, which were maintained in an interest-bearing account and disbursed over the period through September 2024. During the fiscal year ended 6/30/2024, JHHS earned $51,620 of interest, which was not returned to DHHS. Cause Management was not aware of the requirement to return interest earned on advance payments in excess of $500. Effect Management did not perform a calculation of interest earned and return the interest earned to DHHS at least annually, as required. Questioned Costs There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Recommendation JHHS should return the interest earned to DHHS as required, and establish a process to ensure that interest on advance payments received from federal agencies is calculated at least annually and returned appropriately if interest earned is in excess of $500. Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Refer to Management’s View’s and Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MD-0044 and 2021 Award Period: March 11, 2021 through December 31, 2024, liquidated by December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.305(b)8, a payment must not be made to a recipient or subrecipient for amounts that the recipient or subrecipient withholds from contractors to assure satisfactory completion of work. Payment must be made when the recipient or subrecipient disburses the withheld funds to the contractors or to escrow accounts established to ensure satisfactory completion of work. Questioned Costs: None Condition/Context: Four of sixty general disbursements tested were related to retainage payable. These expenditures were not paid during the fiscal year and therefore should not be reported on the SEFA. Cause: The Commission did not have proper policies and procedures in place to ensure the SEFA is prepared in accordance with Uniform Grant Guidance. Effect: The Commission could overstate federal expenditures on the SEFA. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission establish policies and procedures over internal controls to ensure review and approval of SEFA preparation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MD-0044 and 2021 Award Period: March 11, 2021 through December 31, 2024, liquidated by December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR 200.305(b)8, a payment must not be made to a recipient or subrecipient for amounts that the recipient or subrecipient withholds from contractors to assure satisfactory completion of work. Payment must be made when the recipient or subrecipient disburses the withheld funds to the contractors or to escrow accounts established to ensure satisfactory completion of work. Questioned Costs: None Condition/Context: Four of sixty general disbursements tested were related to retainage payable. These expenditures were not paid during the fiscal year and therefore should not be reported on the SEFA. Cause: The Commission did not have proper policies and procedures in place to ensure the SEFA is prepared in accordance with Uniform Grant Guidance. Effect: The Commission could overstate federal expenditures on the SEFA. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Commission establish policies and procedures over internal controls to ensure review and approval of SEFA preparation. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - R&D Cluster: - 12.RD, U.S Department of Defense, Unidentified - 12.351, U.S Department of Defense, Scientific Research - Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction - 20.701, U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program - 93.847, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research - 93.866, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Aging Research Federal Award Identification Number and Year - - 12.RD: N0002420F8355, 2022 - 12.351: HDTRA1-20-2-0002, 2020 - 20.701: 69A3551847103, 2019 - 93.847: 1 U01 DK127384-01, 2023 - 93.866: 1 U2C AG060408-01, 2024 Pass-through Entity - N/A - all direct funded awards Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - As outlined in 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the passthrough entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Further, when the reimbursement method is used for payment, organizations must make a payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the billing unless the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity reasonably believes the request to be improper. Condition - The University did not have adequate controls in place to ensure invoices to subrecipients were paid timely within the 30-calendar-day requirement. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - There were no questioned costs identified. Context - Out of 40 payments to subrecipients that were tested, 16 were made after the 30-calendar-day requirement. In all samples tested, payment was made to the subrecipient; however, the delayed payments ranged from 39 to 441 days between the invoice being received by the University and payment being made to the subrecipient. Cause and Effect - The University’s controls are not designed to ensure payment for all subrecipients was made in accordance with the 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3). Recommendation - The University should implement a control to ensure that payments made to subrecipients are completed within the 30-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Penn State concurs with the audit finding. Penn State is already implementing stronger internal controls to ensure its subrecipients are paid timely.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - R&D Cluster: - 12.RD, U.S Department of Defense, Unidentified - 12.351, U.S Department of Defense, Scientific Research - Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction - 20.701, U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program - 93.847, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research - 93.866, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Aging Research Federal Award Identification Number and Year - - 12.RD: N0002420F8355, 2022 - 12.351: HDTRA1-20-2-0002, 2020 - 20.701: 69A3551847103, 2019 - 93.847: 1 U01 DK127384-01, 2023 - 93.866: 1 U2C AG060408-01, 2024 Pass-through Entity - N/A - all direct funded awards Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - As outlined in 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the passthrough entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Further, when the reimbursement method is used for payment, organizations must make a payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the billing unless the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity reasonably believes the request to be improper. Condition - The University did not have adequate controls in place to ensure invoices to subrecipients were paid timely within the 30-calendar-day requirement. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - There were no questioned costs identified. Context - Out of 40 payments to subrecipients that were tested, 16 were made after the 30-calendar-day requirement. In all samples tested, payment was made to the subrecipient; however, the delayed payments ranged from 39 to 441 days between the invoice being received by the University and payment being made to the subrecipient. Cause and Effect - The University’s controls are not designed to ensure payment for all subrecipients was made in accordance with the 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3). Recommendation - The University should implement a control to ensure that payments made to subrecipients are completed within the 30-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Penn State concurs with the audit finding. Penn State is already implementing stronger internal controls to ensure its subrecipients are paid timely.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - R&D Cluster: - 12.RD, U.S Department of Defense, Unidentified - 12.351, U.S Department of Defense, Scientific Research - Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction - 20.701, U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program - 93.847, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research - 93.866, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Aging Research Federal Award Identification Number and Year - - 12.RD: N0002420F8355, 2022 - 12.351: HDTRA1-20-2-0002, 2020 - 20.701: 69A3551847103, 2019 - 93.847: 1 U01 DK127384-01, 2023 - 93.866: 1 U2C AG060408-01, 2024 Pass-through Entity - N/A - all direct funded awards Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - As outlined in 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the passthrough entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Further, when the reimbursement method is used for payment, organizations must make a payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the billing unless the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity reasonably believes the request to be improper. Condition - The University did not have adequate controls in place to ensure invoices to subrecipients were paid timely within the 30-calendar-day requirement. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - There were no questioned costs identified. Context - Out of 40 payments to subrecipients that were tested, 16 were made after the 30-calendar-day requirement. In all samples tested, payment was made to the subrecipient; however, the delayed payments ranged from 39 to 441 days between the invoice being received by the University and payment being made to the subrecipient. Cause and Effect - The University’s controls are not designed to ensure payment for all subrecipients was made in accordance with the 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3). Recommendation - The University should implement a control to ensure that payments made to subrecipients are completed within the 30-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Penn State concurs with the audit finding. Penn State is already implementing stronger internal controls to ensure its subrecipients are paid timely.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - R&D Cluster: - 12.RD, U.S Department of Defense, Unidentified - 12.351, U.S Department of Defense, Scientific Research - Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction - 20.701, U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program - 93.847, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research - 93.866, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Aging Research Federal Award Identification Number and Year - - 12.RD: N0002420F8355, 2022 - 12.351: HDTRA1-20-2-0002, 2020 - 20.701: 69A3551847103, 2019 - 93.847: 1 U01 DK127384-01, 2023 - 93.866: 1 U2C AG060408-01, 2024 Pass-through Entity - N/A - all direct funded awards Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - As outlined in 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the passthrough entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Further, when the reimbursement method is used for payment, organizations must make a payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the billing unless the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity reasonably believes the request to be improper. Condition - The University did not have adequate controls in place to ensure invoices to subrecipients were paid timely within the 30-calendar-day requirement. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - There were no questioned costs identified. Context - Out of 40 payments to subrecipients that were tested, 16 were made after the 30-calendar-day requirement. In all samples tested, payment was made to the subrecipient; however, the delayed payments ranged from 39 to 441 days between the invoice being received by the University and payment being made to the subrecipient. Cause and Effect - The University’s controls are not designed to ensure payment for all subrecipients was made in accordance with the 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3). Recommendation - The University should implement a control to ensure that payments made to subrecipients are completed within the 30-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Penn State concurs with the audit finding. Penn State is already implementing stronger internal controls to ensure its subrecipients are paid timely.
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name - R&D Cluster: - 12.RD, U.S Department of Defense, Unidentified - 12.351, U.S Department of Defense, Scientific Research - Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction - 20.701, U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program - 93.847, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research - 93.866, U.S. Department of Health and Human Sevices, Aging Research Federal Award Identification Number and Year - - 12.RD: N0002420F8355, 2022 - 12.351: HDTRA1-20-2-0002, 2020 - 20.701: 69A3551847103, 2019 - 93.847: 1 U01 DK127384-01, 2023 - 93.866: 1 U2C AG060408-01, 2024 Pass-through Entity - N/A - all direct funded awards Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - As outlined in 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the passthrough entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Further, when the reimbursement method is used for payment, organizations must make a payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the billing unless the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity reasonably believes the request to be improper. Condition - The University did not have adequate controls in place to ensure invoices to subrecipients were paid timely within the 30-calendar-day requirement. Questioned Costs - None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - There were no questioned costs identified. Context - Out of 40 payments to subrecipients that were tested, 16 were made after the 30-calendar-day requirement. In all samples tested, payment was made to the subrecipient; however, the delayed payments ranged from 39 to 441 days between the invoice being received by the University and payment being made to the subrecipient. Cause and Effect - The University’s controls are not designed to ensure payment for all subrecipients was made in accordance with the 2 CFR 200.305(b)(3). Recommendation - The University should implement a control to ensure that payments made to subrecipients are completed within the 30-day requirement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - Penn State concurs with the audit finding. Penn State is already implementing stronger internal controls to ensure its subrecipients are paid timely.
Condition and Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs. Minimum elapsed time for funds transfer is dependent upon the payment system/method used by the non-federal entity. The US Department of Education (ED) uses the G6 grants management platform, which is a module of the Education Central Automated Processing System (EDCAPS). Generally, funds requested from G6 process overnight and the funds are available in the non-federal entity’s account the next business day. The University has procedures in place to ensure that funds are drawn down from G6 only after they have been expended. However, we noted in one (1) instance where an amount appears to have been drawn down in advance. Context: The University made twenty nine (29) drawdowns of federal program funds during the fiscal year. In comparing the dates of the drawdowns with the accumulated program expenditures to each drawdown date, one (1) drawdown on 12/20/2023 exceeded accumulated program expenditures as of that date by $44,538. By 1/12/2024, the University had expended the amount advanced. Effect: The University was not in compliance with federal cash management regulations for a portion of the current fiscal year. Cause: Administrative oversight. Auditor's Recommendation: The University should development a spreadsheet or other tool similar to the one the auditor used to test cash management compliance that compares cumulative program expenditures to drawdowns. This tool should be updated prior to drawing down funds in order to ensure that drawdowns are limited to amounts expended at any point in time.
Condition and criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1), advance payments to a recipient or subrecipient must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed with actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient or subrecipient in carrying out the purpose of the approved program or project. The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the recipient or subrecipient for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(11) further states that the recipient or subrecipient must generally maintain advance payments of federal funds in interest-bearing accounts. It was noted during the audit that the University received an advance payment of $1,483,500 to be used for student scholarships in a future fiscal year and such advance payment was deposited into a noninterest-bearing account. Context: The funds were advanced to the University in April 2024 and had not been expended as of June 30, 2024. Such funds were still deposited in the noninterest-bearing account as of June 30, 2024. Effect: The University was not in compliance with federal cash management regulations for a portion of the current fiscal year. Cause: University personnel indicate that they were advised by ED that it was permissible to draw down the funds in advance and hold them in a noninterest-bearing account until needed. Auditor’s Recommendation: At a minimum, the University should transfer the advanced funds to an interest-bearing account. Interest earned on federal advance payments in excess of $500 should be remitted annually to the US Department of Health and Human Services using the instructions contained in the enclosures to the original grant award notification. The University should also contact appropriate ED officials to ensure that it is in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1).
Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Number: N/A Federal Award Year: 2023/2024 Pass Through Entity: Chicago Cook Workforce Partnership Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303, the non-Federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: The Organization is either lacking or has nonconforming written policies and procedures for the following administrative functions, required by0 the Uniform Guidance: 1. Financial management - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) - spacing 2. Allowable Costs - 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) 3. Federal payment - 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1) 4. Procurement - 2 CFR 200.318(a) and 2 CFR 200.318(c)(1) 5. Competition - 2 CFR 200.319(d) 6. Methods of procurement to be followed - 2 CFR 200.320 7. Compensation (Personal Services) - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(1) 8. Compensation (Fringe Benefits - Leave) - 2 CFR 200.431(b)(1) 9. Relocation costs of employees - 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) 10. Travel costs - 2 CFR 200.474 Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to the items described above. Context: The conditions outlined above are based on our review of the Organization’s policies and procedures, which were found to be not in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The Organization was not aware of the specific Uniform Guidance requirements for certain written policies and procedures. Effect: The Organization did not have these policies and procedures in place to reasonably ensure that program functions are achieved effectively, efficiently and in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The Organization was not in compliance with the administrative requirements set forth in the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization design procedures and implement internal control procedures to ensure that the Uniform Guidance administrative requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: See corrective action plan attached to financial statements.
Criteria: The federal award program noted above is not subject to the Treasury-State Cash Management Improvement Act agreement and, as such, is subject to 2 CFR 200.305(b), which states: “The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the non-Federal entity for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. The non-Federal entity must make timely payment to contractors in accordance with the contract provisions.” 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. The State of Hawaii, Department of Budget and Finance has determined and communicated in Finance Memorandum 20-02 that their standard for an “administratively feasible time period” was 21 calendar days. Condition: During the testing of the Department’s cash management procedures, it was determined that eight out of sixty payments tested were not distributed within 21 days of the draw down of funds. For the items tested, the time elapsed between draw down and payment ranged from 22 to 44 days. Context: During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the program expended $9,608,301 (excluding food expenditures). Cause: The Department draws down federal funds that will be needed based on the expenditures that must be paid. However, since deposits must be posted prior to the processing of payments or disbursing of the funds, it is difficult for the Department to disburse federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305 (b). Also, the State’s payment process requires all State departments to process payments through DAGS resulting in processing delays. Effect: Noncompliance with federal regulations could result in a loss of funding that may jeopardize the operations of the Department’s federally funded programs. Questioned Costs: None Identification as a Repeat Finding, if applicable: See finding 2023-011 included in the Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department work with DAGS and the Department of Budget and Finance to ensure compliance with established standard and timely disbursement of federal funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305(b). Views of Responsible Officials: Client agrees with finding, and the unabridged version of their response can be found in the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Department.
Develop Written Policies and Procedures Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that organizations who manage the federal award: • Understand and comply with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; • Evaluate and monitor compliance; • Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance is identified. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to develop written procedures related to the following areas: 1. Cash Management 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. 2. Equipment Management Requirements Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). In addition, the organizations should ensure that existing written procedures are in compliance with: a. General Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.327 discusses that contracts must be established and managed in accordance with the procurement requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Grantees must have written procurement policies and procedures that demonstrate a fair and reliable process, with standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest, for obtaining grant-funded goods and services. Condition MARTA does not have comprehensive written policies and procedures concerning the following key compliance areas which are required by the Uniform Guidance: Equipment and Real Property Management MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures, however, it does not clearly define the policies and procedures that are in place for the use, management and disposition of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). Cash Management MARTA does not have written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment MARTA has a Procurement policy, however, documented procedures are not well-defined regarding the purchase process for different types of procurement, obtaining quotations, bidding, and procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Cause MARTA’s reliance on informal business practices leads to inconsistencies in its internal controls. Effect The absence of formal policies and procedures in the key compliance areas could result in non-compliance with federal regulations, which may lead to unnecessary sanctions. Additionally, without formal written policies and procedures, it is difficult to ensure consistent practices across the organization. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should develop and implement formal written policies and procedures for the specific areas required by the Uniform Guidance. These policies and procedures must clearly delineate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Personnel responsible for these areas should receive adequate training and apply the policies effectively. Regular reviews should be conducted to update the policies and procedures as needed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA has grown substantially in the last several years. This progress includes identifying areas that we need to update or to develop new processes and documentation. MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures in which the purpose is to ensure that fixed assets are properly accounted for, identified, and tracked. MARTA also has Cash Handling Policy and Procedures which addresses safeguarding public funds and maximizing resources available. This is designed to reduce the risks associated with the collection, receipts storage and reporting of cash transactions and to safeguard and maintain the security and integrity of MARTA's fiscal assets. MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will review and update these policies and/or create new policies to make sure that they are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. The updated or newly created policies will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Develop Written Policies and Procedures Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that organizations who manage the federal award: • Understand and comply with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; • Evaluate and monitor compliance; • Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance is identified. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to develop written procedures related to the following areas: 1. Cash Management 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. 2. Equipment Management Requirements Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). In addition, the organizations should ensure that existing written procedures are in compliance with: a. General Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.327 discusses that contracts must be established and managed in accordance with the procurement requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Grantees must have written procurement policies and procedures that demonstrate a fair and reliable process, with standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest, for obtaining grant-funded goods and services. Condition MARTA does not have comprehensive written policies and procedures concerning the following key compliance areas which are required by the Uniform Guidance: Equipment and Real Property Management MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures, however, it does not clearly define the policies and procedures that are in place for the use, management and disposition of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). Cash Management MARTA does not have written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment MARTA has a Procurement policy, however, documented procedures are not well-defined regarding the purchase process for different types of procurement, obtaining quotations, bidding, and procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Cause MARTA’s reliance on informal business practices leads to inconsistencies in its internal controls. Effect The absence of formal policies and procedures in the key compliance areas could result in non-compliance with federal regulations, which may lead to unnecessary sanctions. Additionally, without formal written policies and procedures, it is difficult to ensure consistent practices across the organization. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should develop and implement formal written policies and procedures for the specific areas required by the Uniform Guidance. These policies and procedures must clearly delineate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Personnel responsible for these areas should receive adequate training and apply the policies effectively. Regular reviews should be conducted to update the policies and procedures as needed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA has grown substantially in the last several years. This progress includes identifying areas that we need to update or to develop new processes and documentation. MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures in which the purpose is to ensure that fixed assets are properly accounted for, identified, and tracked. MARTA also has Cash Handling Policy and Procedures which addresses safeguarding public funds and maximizing resources available. This is designed to reduce the risks associated with the collection, receipts storage and reporting of cash transactions and to safeguard and maintain the security and integrity of MARTA's fiscal assets. MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will review and update these policies and/or create new policies to make sure that they are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. The updated or newly created policies will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Develop Written Policies and Procedures Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that organizations who manage the federal award: • Understand and comply with the federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; • Evaluate and monitor compliance; • Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance is identified. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, or the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to develop written procedures related to the following areas: 1. Cash Management 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. 2. Equipment Management Requirements Non-federal entities other than states must follow 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). In addition, the organizations should ensure that existing written procedures are in compliance with: a. General Procurement Standards 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.327 discusses that contracts must be established and managed in accordance with the procurement requirements in 2 CFR Part 200. Grantees must have written procurement policies and procedures that demonstrate a fair and reliable process, with standards of conduct addressing conflicts of interest, for obtaining grant-funded goods and services. Condition MARTA does not have comprehensive written policies and procedures concerning the following key compliance areas which are required by the Uniform Guidance: Equipment and Real Property Management MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures, however, it does not clearly define the policies and procedures that are in place for the use, management and disposition of equipment acquired under a Federal award in accordance with 2 CFR sections 200.313(c) through (e). Cash Management MARTA does not have written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Federal Payment. Procurement, Suspension and Debarment MARTA has a Procurement policy, however, documented procedures are not well-defined regarding the purchase process for different types of procurement, obtaining quotations, bidding, and procedures for verifying that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded. Cause MARTA’s reliance on informal business practices leads to inconsistencies in its internal controls. Effect The absence of formal policies and procedures in the key compliance areas could result in non-compliance with federal regulations, which may lead to unnecessary sanctions. Additionally, without formal written policies and procedures, it is difficult to ensure consistent practices across the organization. Questioned Costs None Recommendation MARTA should develop and implement formal written policies and procedures for the specific areas required by the Uniform Guidance. These policies and procedures must clearly delineate the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Personnel responsible for these areas should receive adequate training and apply the policies effectively. Regular reviews should be conducted to update the policies and procedures as needed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action MARTA has grown substantially in the last several years. This progress includes identifying areas that we need to update or to develop new processes and documentation. MARTA has an Asset Inventory Policy and Procedures in which the purpose is to ensure that fixed assets are properly accounted for, identified, and tracked. MARTA also has Cash Handling Policy and Procedures which addresses safeguarding public funds and maximizing resources available. This is designed to reduce the risks associated with the collection, receipts storage and reporting of cash transactions and to safeguard and maintain the security and integrity of MARTA's fiscal assets. MARTA is in the process of updating the Procurement Policy. MARTA will review and update these policies and/or create new policies to make sure that they are compliant with the Uniform Guidance. The updated or newly created policies will be brought to the October 2025 Board of Directors meeting for Board review or approval. Personnel responsible: Sandy Benson, General Manager Anticipated completion date: October 2025
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.
Federal Program Information: Research and Development Cluster (various ALN #’s) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): M. Subrecipient Monitoring - per 2 CFR Part 200.305(b), for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. Condition: The University’s procedures failed to minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the subrecipient and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes by the subrecipient. Cause: Insufficient internal controls and administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient invoice approval. Effect or Potential Effect: The University was not in compliance with the cash management requirements of a pass-through entity. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 4 of 21 subrecipient invoices selected for testing, the University did not review and pay the subrecipient in a timely manner. Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of prior year finding 2023-015. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its internal controls and procedures to ensure timely review and payment of subrecipient invoices. Views of Responsible Officials: The process to review subrecipient invoices will be improved by requiring the review of supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable by the Sponsored Program Office (SPO) post award team. This team will thoroughly review supporting documents to ensure expenses are allowable, allocable, reasonable and recorded in the proper period according to university policies and grant terms. Invoices will be reviewed by SPO and will serve as the key control point before transactions are forwarded to accounting to post to sponsored awards. Subrecipient invoices will be paid by Accounts Payable only after approval by SPO and GCA. The Director of Compliance will conduct spot checks on all sponsored transactional activity, especially for high-risk grants to provide an additional layer of oversight. The new review process and training for these responsibilities will be implemented by spring 2025 as part of the broader campus-wide workflow training and staffing up of the new SPO Post-Award office.