Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Finding number: 2022-001 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and noncompliance Federal program: Research and Development Cluster – various Assistance Listing numbers Federal agency: Various Pass-through entity: Various Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Research and Development Cluster, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Research and Development Cluster, we noted 7 expenditures that totaled $4,061 of our sample of 40 expenditures that totaled $95,703 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 7 draws of our sample of 25 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $20,298 of the total cash draws tested of $601,919. Additionally, we noted 3 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $466. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $463 related to interest on the over draw $466 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $929 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
Findings and Questioned Costs Relating to Federal Awards Finding number: 2022-006 Type of finding: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance Federal program: Medical Student Education, Assistance Listing No. 93.680 Federal agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through entity: Not applicable Federal award year: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Compliance Requirement: Cash management Criteria The requirements for cash management are contained in Section 200.305 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2 CFR 200), Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), the A-102 Common Rule (§_.21), 0MB Circular A-110 (2 CFR section 215.22), Treasury regulations at 31 CFR part 205, program legislation, Federal awarding agency regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. When entities are funded on a reimbursement basis, program costs must be paid for by entity funds before reimbursement is requested from the Federal Government. Additionally, Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance indicates that the nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Uniform Guidance also indicates that these internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” (Green Book) issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has clarified that the references to the Green Book and COSO were only provided as best practices and not requirements. Condition During our test work over the Medical Student Education Program, we selected a sample of expenditures and cash draws/issued invoices to sponsors to verify the expenditures were paid prior to the date of the reimbursement request. We also verified the cash draw was supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. For the Medical Student Education Program, we noted 3 expenditures totaling $105,643 of our sample of 40 expenditures totaling $556,930 were not paid prior to the reimbursement request. Additionally, we noted 2 draws of our sample of 13 where the draw was over drawn. The total overdraw was $69,800 of the total cash draws tested of $3,945,157. Additionally, we noted 9 draws were not supported by a detail of expenditures that reconciled. The variance difference was $48,745. Cause UAMS did not maintain adequate support for cash draws causing unreconciled variances in the draw request detail. Additionally, cash draws were not appropriately reviewed to ensure that the expenditures were paid prior to the reimbursement requests. Effect Failure to properly complete cash draws may prevent UAMS from being in compliance with the requirements set forth by the Uniform Guidance. Questioned costs $246 related to interest on the over draw $48,745 related to unreconciled variances between the cash draw and the expenditure detail $48,991 total questioned costs Questioned costs related to the instances where the expenditure was not paid prior to the reimbursement request are not determinable. Statistical Sample The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding A similar finding was not reported in prior year audit. Recommendation We recommend that management design and implement internal controls that will ensure that program costs are paid before a request for reimbursement is made. Additionally, we recommend that management keep records of what expenditures make up each draw. View of responsible officials We concur with the finding. The instances where expenditures were not paid prior to the reimbursement request was noted in the prior year audit and was corrected as soon as the finding was communicated to management. The exceptions identified in the current year audit were prior to the control process changes made by management to ensure all expenses are paid before reimbursement is requested. There were no exceptions noted after the date of the change from the prior year audit. During the fiscal year, the grants accounting office experienced a significant turnover in staff and leadership in addition to implementing a new financial system. With the new director and staff in place and completing the implementation of the financial system, we believe adequate controls have been established and are working properly to ensure compliance with cash management regulations.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.
2022-003: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control / Immaterial Noncompliance – Cash Management (repeat comment) Federal Program: WIOA Cluster (ALN 17.258/17.259/17.278) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.305(b) states, in part: “For Non-Federal entities payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity…” 2 CFR 200.305(b)(2)(ii) states, in part: “Non-Federal entities must be authorized to submit requests for advance payments and reimbursements….”. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) states, in part: “the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 – Federal Payment”. Condition: 1) The Consortium requested funds in advance of when the related disbursements were made, 2) the basis for the advances (requests) were not supported by appropriate documentation, and 3) authorization for requesting funds in advance was not obtained. Context: The amount overdrawn for the WIOA Cluster totaled $125,668. It was noted that other programs were also overdrawn as follows: SNAP Cluster (ALN 10.561): $81,751 and Unemployment Insurance (ALN 17.225): $8,143. The total amount of funds overdrawn as of year-end totaled $215,562. Cause: Management oversight. Effect: Funds were requested and received in advance of when the related payments were disbursed without obtaining authorization for advance payments, and without properly documenting the basis for the requested funds. Consequently, the Consortium did not minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-Federal entity. Recommendation: The Consortium should carefully review their policies and procedures and make the necessary changes to assure that cash draws are based on expenditures already incurred and they are supported by transactions recorded in the books and records of the Consortium. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding. Michigan Works! Southeast will continue to ensure it adheres to the policy standards for cash on hand time limits.