Reporting – FFATA Subawards Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Federal Program Title: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Cluster ALN: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 23A55AY000040–01–00 April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2026 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Workforce (TWC) must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that TWC is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109- 282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition: As the prime recipient of grant funding, TWC is responsible for reporting first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more in FSRS. Audit procedures included testing 59 subawards made during the fiscal year for FFATA requirements, including subawards made by Texas Education Agency (TEA) using state pass through funds from TWC. TWC passed through $3,000,000 of federal grant funds to TEA who in turn made 33 subawards totaling $2,911,755. Based on Part 3 of the 2024 compliance supplement, transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship. Accordingly, subawards made by TEA should be reported in FSRS by TWC as the prime recipient. The following compliance exceptions were identified: See chart or table in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: TWC considered the funds passed through to TEA as a subaward and reported these amounts in FSRS. However, as TEA is an agency of the State of Texas, it does not meet the definition of a subrecipient. Effect: Failure to submit FFATA subawards timely may lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that, as the prime recipient, TWC coordinate with state pass through entities to obtain the information needed for FFATA reporting in order to be compliant with FFATA requirements. Views of responsible officials: In this situation, TWC disagrees with the applicability of the following statement “Transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship” from the Fiscal Year 2024 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement. According to 2 CFR Part 170, TWC is required to report first-tier subawards. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) which designates TEA as a subrecipient of TWC making TEA a first_x0002_tier grantee of TWC. Neither TWC nor TEA considers this funding a “transfer.” The definition of a pass-through entity according to 2 CFR Part 200, means a recipient or subrecipient that provides a subaward to a subrecipient (including lower tier subrecipients) to carry out a federal program. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) that establishes a relationship that would not be considered a transfer but a first tier subaward. The IAC establishes TWC as a pass-through entity and TEA as a subrecipient per the definitions of these terms in 2 CFR 200.1. Under the requirements for pass-through entities at 2 CFR 200.332, TWC is responsible for monitoring TEA performance under this subaward which may include enforcement under 2 CFR 200.339 and the recovery of costs associated with subrecipient noncompliance. This contractual consideration and possibility of repayment supports that this relationship is one of pass-through and subrecipient, and not a transfer of a federal award to another component of an auditee. As such, subawards made by TEA are in fact second tier subawards for TWC and TWC has no obligation to report them as established in Appendix A 2 CFR Part 170. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) was passed in the vein of openness and transparency to the public as it relates to Federal spending. Reporting on first-tier subawards took effect October 1, 2010. (See OMB Memorandum for Senior Accountable Officials, “Open Government Directive–Federal Spending Transparency and Subaward and Compensation Data Reporting,” August 27, 2010.) FFATA, § 2—Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, directed the Office of Management and Budget to “ensure the existence and operation of a single searchable website, accessible by the public at no cost to access, that includes for each Federal award—(A) the name of the entity receiving the award” and other specified information. (See Public Law 109-282, §2(b).) That website is USASpending.gov. On that website, a search by “recipient” does not have an option to search for “State of Texas.” Rather, the search options individually list the Texas Workforce Commission and other Texas state agencies as separate recipients. When TWC makes an interagency pass-through contract to another state agency, TWC has always treated that other state agency as first-tier subrecipient for FFATA reporting purposes. That decision was based on guidance and interpretation of information available when the FFATA subaward reporting requirements took effect in 2010. TWC has continued in that manner with no audit finding on that approach until now. If TWC adheres to the recommendation made by this finding, the public will no longer have access to the interagency contract amounts through USASpending.gov. The USASpending.gov data presented to the public will instead indicate that the subrecipients of another state agency received subawards directly from TWC, which is inaccurate, will make the USASpending.gov data of the other state agency incomplete, and will cause the USASpending.gov data to be inconsistent with both state agencies’ presentation of those subawards in their respective systems and financial statements. In effect, the USASpending.gov data will represent the subawards of the other state agency as TWC’s subrecipients, while TWC’s systems and financial statements will have no record of those subawards beyond FFATA reporting. Similarly, the other state agency’s systems and financial statements will reflect those subawards as its own, but with no related reflection of that relationship in USASpending.gov. If the public were to submit an open records request about the subawards, the State’s response would be delayed by one state agency collecting data from the other, and inconsistent with the public’s expectation as to which state agency issued and managed those subawards. Those effects seem inconsistent with FFATA’s openness and transparency goals.
Reporting – FFATA Subawards Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Federal Program Title: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Cluster ALN: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 23A55AY000040–01–00 April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2026 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Workforce (TWC) must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that TWC is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109- 282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition: As the prime recipient of grant funding, TWC is responsible for reporting first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more in FSRS. Audit procedures included testing 59 subawards made during the fiscal year for FFATA requirements, including subawards made by Texas Education Agency (TEA) using state pass through funds from TWC. TWC passed through $3,000,000 of federal grant funds to TEA who in turn made 33 subawards totaling $2,911,755. Based on Part 3 of the 2024 compliance supplement, transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship. Accordingly, subawards made by TEA should be reported in FSRS by TWC as the prime recipient. The following compliance exceptions were identified: See chart or table in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: TWC considered the funds passed through to TEA as a subaward and reported these amounts in FSRS. However, as TEA is an agency of the State of Texas, it does not meet the definition of a subrecipient. Effect: Failure to submit FFATA subawards timely may lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that, as the prime recipient, TWC coordinate with state pass through entities to obtain the information needed for FFATA reporting in order to be compliant with FFATA requirements. Views of responsible officials: In this situation, TWC disagrees with the applicability of the following statement “Transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship” from the Fiscal Year 2024 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement. According to 2 CFR Part 170, TWC is required to report first-tier subawards. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) which designates TEA as a subrecipient of TWC making TEA a first_x0002_tier grantee of TWC. Neither TWC nor TEA considers this funding a “transfer.” The definition of a pass-through entity according to 2 CFR Part 200, means a recipient or subrecipient that provides a subaward to a subrecipient (including lower tier subrecipients) to carry out a federal program. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) that establishes a relationship that would not be considered a transfer but a first tier subaward. The IAC establishes TWC as a pass-through entity and TEA as a subrecipient per the definitions of these terms in 2 CFR 200.1. Under the requirements for pass-through entities at 2 CFR 200.332, TWC is responsible for monitoring TEA performance under this subaward which may include enforcement under 2 CFR 200.339 and the recovery of costs associated with subrecipient noncompliance. This contractual consideration and possibility of repayment supports that this relationship is one of pass-through and subrecipient, and not a transfer of a federal award to another component of an auditee. As such, subawards made by TEA are in fact second tier subawards for TWC and TWC has no obligation to report them as established in Appendix A 2 CFR Part 170. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) was passed in the vein of openness and transparency to the public as it relates to Federal spending. Reporting on first-tier subawards took effect October 1, 2010. (See OMB Memorandum for Senior Accountable Officials, “Open Government Directive–Federal Spending Transparency and Subaward and Compensation Data Reporting,” August 27, 2010.) FFATA, § 2—Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, directed the Office of Management and Budget to “ensure the existence and operation of a single searchable website, accessible by the public at no cost to access, that includes for each Federal award—(A) the name of the entity receiving the award” and other specified information. (See Public Law 109-282, §2(b).) That website is USASpending.gov. On that website, a search by “recipient” does not have an option to search for “State of Texas.” Rather, the search options individually list the Texas Workforce Commission and other Texas state agencies as separate recipients. When TWC makes an interagency pass-through contract to another state agency, TWC has always treated that other state agency as first-tier subrecipient for FFATA reporting purposes. That decision was based on guidance and interpretation of information available when the FFATA subaward reporting requirements took effect in 2010. TWC has continued in that manner with no audit finding on that approach until now. If TWC adheres to the recommendation made by this finding, the public will no longer have access to the interagency contract amounts through USASpending.gov. The USASpending.gov data presented to the public will instead indicate that the subrecipients of another state agency received subawards directly from TWC, which is inaccurate, will make the USASpending.gov data of the other state agency incomplete, and will cause the USASpending.gov data to be inconsistent with both state agencies’ presentation of those subawards in their respective systems and financial statements. In effect, the USASpending.gov data will represent the subawards of the other state agency as TWC’s subrecipients, while TWC’s systems and financial statements will have no record of those subawards beyond FFATA reporting. Similarly, the other state agency’s systems and financial statements will reflect those subawards as its own, but with no related reflection of that relationship in USASpending.gov. If the public were to submit an open records request about the subawards, the State’s response would be delayed by one state agency collecting data from the other, and inconsistent with the public’s expectation as to which state agency issued and managed those subawards. Those effects seem inconsistent with FFATA’s openness and transparency goals.
Reporting – FFATA Subawards Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Federal Program Title: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Cluster ALN: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 23A55AY000040–01–00 April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2026 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Workforce (TWC) must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that TWC is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109- 282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition: As the prime recipient of grant funding, TWC is responsible for reporting first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more in FSRS. Audit procedures included testing 59 subawards made during the fiscal year for FFATA requirements, including subawards made by Texas Education Agency (TEA) using state pass through funds from TWC. TWC passed through $3,000,000 of federal grant funds to TEA who in turn made 33 subawards totaling $2,911,755. Based on Part 3 of the 2024 compliance supplement, transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship. Accordingly, subawards made by TEA should be reported in FSRS by TWC as the prime recipient. The following compliance exceptions were identified: See chart or table in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: TWC considered the funds passed through to TEA as a subaward and reported these amounts in FSRS. However, as TEA is an agency of the State of Texas, it does not meet the definition of a subrecipient. Effect: Failure to submit FFATA subawards timely may lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that, as the prime recipient, TWC coordinate with state pass through entities to obtain the information needed for FFATA reporting in order to be compliant with FFATA requirements. Views of responsible officials: In this situation, TWC disagrees with the applicability of the following statement “Transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship” from the Fiscal Year 2024 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement. According to 2 CFR Part 170, TWC is required to report first-tier subawards. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) which designates TEA as a subrecipient of TWC making TEA a first_x0002_tier grantee of TWC. Neither TWC nor TEA considers this funding a “transfer.” The definition of a pass-through entity according to 2 CFR Part 200, means a recipient or subrecipient that provides a subaward to a subrecipient (including lower tier subrecipients) to carry out a federal program. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) that establishes a relationship that would not be considered a transfer but a first tier subaward. The IAC establishes TWC as a pass-through entity and TEA as a subrecipient per the definitions of these terms in 2 CFR 200.1. Under the requirements for pass-through entities at 2 CFR 200.332, TWC is responsible for monitoring TEA performance under this subaward which may include enforcement under 2 CFR 200.339 and the recovery of costs associated with subrecipient noncompliance. This contractual consideration and possibility of repayment supports that this relationship is one of pass-through and subrecipient, and not a transfer of a federal award to another component of an auditee. As such, subawards made by TEA are in fact second tier subawards for TWC and TWC has no obligation to report them as established in Appendix A 2 CFR Part 170. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) was passed in the vein of openness and transparency to the public as it relates to Federal spending. Reporting on first-tier subawards took effect October 1, 2010. (See OMB Memorandum for Senior Accountable Officials, “Open Government Directive–Federal Spending Transparency and Subaward and Compensation Data Reporting,” August 27, 2010.) FFATA, § 2—Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, directed the Office of Management and Budget to “ensure the existence and operation of a single searchable website, accessible by the public at no cost to access, that includes for each Federal award—(A) the name of the entity receiving the award” and other specified information. (See Public Law 109-282, §2(b).) That website is USASpending.gov. On that website, a search by “recipient” does not have an option to search for “State of Texas.” Rather, the search options individually list the Texas Workforce Commission and other Texas state agencies as separate recipients. When TWC makes an interagency pass-through contract to another state agency, TWC has always treated that other state agency as first-tier subrecipient for FFATA reporting purposes. That decision was based on guidance and interpretation of information available when the FFATA subaward reporting requirements took effect in 2010. TWC has continued in that manner with no audit finding on that approach until now. If TWC adheres to the recommendation made by this finding, the public will no longer have access to the interagency contract amounts through USASpending.gov. The USASpending.gov data presented to the public will instead indicate that the subrecipients of another state agency received subawards directly from TWC, which is inaccurate, will make the USASpending.gov data of the other state agency incomplete, and will cause the USASpending.gov data to be inconsistent with both state agencies’ presentation of those subawards in their respective systems and financial statements. In effect, the USASpending.gov data will represent the subawards of the other state agency as TWC’s subrecipients, while TWC’s systems and financial statements will have no record of those subawards beyond FFATA reporting. Similarly, the other state agency’s systems and financial statements will reflect those subawards as its own, but with no related reflection of that relationship in USASpending.gov. If the public were to submit an open records request about the subawards, the State’s response would be delayed by one state agency collecting data from the other, and inconsistent with the public’s expectation as to which state agency issued and managed those subawards. Those effects seem inconsistent with FFATA’s openness and transparency goals.
Reporting – FFATA Subawards Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Labor Federal Program Title: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Cluster ALN: 17.258, 17.259, 17.278 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: 23A55AY000040–01–00 April 1, 2023 – June 30, 2026 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Workforce (TWC) must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that TWC is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109- 282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Condition: As the prime recipient of grant funding, TWC is responsible for reporting first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more in FSRS. Audit procedures included testing 59 subawards made during the fiscal year for FFATA requirements, including subawards made by Texas Education Agency (TEA) using state pass through funds from TWC. TWC passed through $3,000,000 of federal grant funds to TEA who in turn made 33 subawards totaling $2,911,755. Based on Part 3 of the 2024 compliance supplement, transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship. Accordingly, subawards made by TEA should be reported in FSRS by TWC as the prime recipient. The following compliance exceptions were identified: See chart or table in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: TWC considered the funds passed through to TEA as a subaward and reported these amounts in FSRS. However, as TEA is an agency of the State of Texas, it does not meet the definition of a subrecipient. Effect: Failure to submit FFATA subawards timely may lead to noncompliance with federal requirements. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that, as the prime recipient, TWC coordinate with state pass through entities to obtain the information needed for FFATA reporting in order to be compliant with FFATA requirements. Views of responsible officials: In this situation, TWC disagrees with the applicability of the following statement “Transfers of federal awards to another component of the same auditee under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, do not constitute a subrecipient or contractor relationship” from the Fiscal Year 2024 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement. According to 2 CFR Part 170, TWC is required to report first-tier subawards. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) which designates TEA as a subrecipient of TWC making TEA a first_x0002_tier grantee of TWC. Neither TWC nor TEA considers this funding a “transfer.” The definition of a pass-through entity according to 2 CFR Part 200, means a recipient or subrecipient that provides a subaward to a subrecipient (including lower tier subrecipients) to carry out a federal program. In the case of TWC and TEA, there is an Interagency Agreement Contract (IAC) that establishes a relationship that would not be considered a transfer but a first tier subaward. The IAC establishes TWC as a pass-through entity and TEA as a subrecipient per the definitions of these terms in 2 CFR 200.1. Under the requirements for pass-through entities at 2 CFR 200.332, TWC is responsible for monitoring TEA performance under this subaward which may include enforcement under 2 CFR 200.339 and the recovery of costs associated with subrecipient noncompliance. This contractual consideration and possibility of repayment supports that this relationship is one of pass-through and subrecipient, and not a transfer of a federal award to another component of an auditee. As such, subawards made by TEA are in fact second tier subawards for TWC and TWC has no obligation to report them as established in Appendix A 2 CFR Part 170. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) was passed in the vein of openness and transparency to the public as it relates to Federal spending. Reporting on first-tier subawards took effect October 1, 2010. (See OMB Memorandum for Senior Accountable Officials, “Open Government Directive–Federal Spending Transparency and Subaward and Compensation Data Reporting,” August 27, 2010.) FFATA, § 2—Full Disclosure of Entities Receiving Federal Funding, directed the Office of Management and Budget to “ensure the existence and operation of a single searchable website, accessible by the public at no cost to access, that includes for each Federal award—(A) the name of the entity receiving the award” and other specified information. (See Public Law 109-282, §2(b).) That website is USASpending.gov. On that website, a search by “recipient” does not have an option to search for “State of Texas.” Rather, the search options individually list the Texas Workforce Commission and other Texas state agencies as separate recipients. When TWC makes an interagency pass-through contract to another state agency, TWC has always treated that other state agency as first-tier subrecipient for FFATA reporting purposes. That decision was based on guidance and interpretation of information available when the FFATA subaward reporting requirements took effect in 2010. TWC has continued in that manner with no audit finding on that approach until now. If TWC adheres to the recommendation made by this finding, the public will no longer have access to the interagency contract amounts through USASpending.gov. The USASpending.gov data presented to the public will instead indicate that the subrecipients of another state agency received subawards directly from TWC, which is inaccurate, will make the USASpending.gov data of the other state agency incomplete, and will cause the USASpending.gov data to be inconsistent with both state agencies’ presentation of those subawards in their respective systems and financial statements. In effect, the USASpending.gov data will represent the subawards of the other state agency as TWC’s subrecipients, while TWC’s systems and financial statements will have no record of those subawards beyond FFATA reporting. Similarly, the other state agency’s systems and financial statements will reflect those subawards as its own, but with no related reflection of that relationship in USASpending.gov. If the public were to submit an open records request about the subawards, the State’s response would be delayed by one state agency collecting data from the other, and inconsistent with the public’s expectation as to which state agency issued and managed those subawards. Those effects seem inconsistent with FFATA’s openness and transparency goals.
Period of Performance, Procurement, Suspension and Debarment, Reporting – Information Technology – Logical Security Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: Rehabilitation Service – Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States ALN: 84.126 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: H126A220092, H126A230092, H126A240092 October 1, 2021– September 30, 2023, October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, and October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that TWC is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: RehabWorks is TWC’s electronic case management system for the Vocational Rehabilitation program. Capabilities of the application include the ability to create service records (requisitions), generate service authorizations (purchase orders) and payment authorizations so that program expenditures are attributed to the casefile of the customer on whose behalf the goods or services were purchased in accordance with Federal regulations and the terms of the grant. During our testing of the information technology general controls of RehabWorks, we noted that TWC did not have proper segregation of duties to prevent developers of the application to promote their own changes into the production environment. Six of the 15 RehabWorks developers had access to production functions within the application. Access to migrate changes to the production environment should be restricted appropriately and based on job function to help ensure adequate internal controls are in place and appropriate segregation of duties exist. In general, developers should not have access to migrate changes to the production environment and should not have access privileges above read-only in the application. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: TWC’s information technology policies and procedures do not limit the number of developers who have access to production functions within the RehabWorks application. Effect: Failure to segregate user access may result in data loss, alteration or destruction of production data and/or disruption of operations. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that TWC ensure that logical access to promote code changes to production should be limited to mitigate the risk of unapproved changes being implemented in production which may result in data loss, alteration or destruction of production data and/or disruption of operations. Views of responsible officials: TWC’s IT leadership agrees with this observation.
Procurement, and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: Rehabilitation Services – Vocational Rehabilitation Grants to States ALN: 84.126 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Number and Period: H126A220092, H126A230092, H126A240092 October 1, 2021– September 30, 2023, October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2024, and October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024 Statistically Valid Sample: No, and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Per 2 CFR 200.214, recipients and subrecipients are subject to the nonprocurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, as well as 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict making Federal awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from receiving or participating in Federal awards. Per 2 CFR 180.505 – Who uses SAM.gov Exclusions? (a) Federal agency officials use SAM.gov Exclusions to determine whether to enter into a transaction with a person, as required under § 180.430. (b) Participants also may, but are not required to, use SAM.gov Exclusions to determine if: (1) Principals of their transactions are excluded or disqualified, as required under § 180.320; or (2) Persons with whom they are entering into covered transactions at the next lower tier are excluded or disqualified. (c) The SAM.gov Exclusions are available to the general public. Condition: TWC’s Procurement and Contract Management Handbook (Revised April 2024) states that vendor compliance verifications include checking the Comptroller’s vendor performance tracking system, debarment, federal database checks and other verifications. A vendor that fails a verification may not move forward in the evaluation process and receive a contract award. Audit procedures included testing 34 procurements during the fiscal year to test whether vendor compliance verifications were completed prior to entering into a covered transaction. During our testing, we noted the following instances of noncompliance: For one procurement, the vendor compliance verification was completed for the incorrect vendor. A search was completed for the director of the organization rather than the legal entity name. For four of the procurements, a valid date stamp was not available to confirm the verification was completed prior to entering into a covered transaction. Questioned costs: None Context: See “Condition.” Cause: Individuals performing the vendor compliance checks were not adequately trained on the requirements and timeline that must be adhered to per TWC’s Procurement and Contract Management Handbook and federal guidelines. Effect: Failure to complete proper vendor compliance checks prior to entering into a covered transaction may lead to entering into contracts with suspended or disbarred vendors that could result in noncompliance and questioned costs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that TWC provide additional training to individuals performing vendor compliance checks. We also recommend TWC establish internal controls to monitor that vendor compliance checks are being completed accurately and timely. Views of responsible officials: TWC’s Procurement and Contract Management (PCS) agrees with the recommendations.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.
General Controls. The following compliance areas were impacted: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Cash Management Equipment and Real Property Management Period of Performance Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Subrecipient Monitoring Special Tests and Provisions – Key Personnel Federal Program Title: Research and Development Cluster Federal Agency: Federal agencies that award Research and Development Cluster funds Assistance Listing Number: Multiple Pass-Through Agency: N/A Award Number: Multiple Award Period: Multiple Statistically Valid Sample: No and not intended to be a statistically valid sample Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No An institution must establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the institution is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award (Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 200.303(a)). The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (Medical Branch) did not appropriately maintain certain systems it uses to manage its federal research and development awards. The Medical Branch asserted that the maintenance was postponed as the institution was evaluating the most effective approach for implementing certain upgrades. Not ensuring that systems are updated and supported increases the risk of data loss or security breaches. After auditors brought the issue to the institution’s attention, the Medical Branch asserted that the appropriate maintenance was obtained. Recommendation: The Medical Branch should ensure that all systems used to manage federal awards are appropriately maintained and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the auditor’s recommendation. Through analysis of the exceptions identified in the audit, the University implemented corrective action to reinstate maintenance and support.