Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.
Finding 2024‐003 Indirect Cost Information on the federal/state program: Federal Award agency; Research and Development Cluster COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) ALN: Various 21.027 Criteria or specific requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Internal Controls Federal Awards 2 CFR Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition: The College did not retain documentation and evidence of review of the indirect cost amounts being charged to the R&D and CSLFRF programs. Management performed a monthly control that included reviewing a sample of indirect costs charged to grants on a sample basis. The College had a new ERP implementation that went into effect on January 1, 2024. Management did not perform the monthly control subsequent to the ERP implementation for the last 6 months of year. Questioned costs: None Section III – Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs (continued) Context: During our testing over indirect cost, we selected 2 months during FY24 to test managements control. We observed that during FY24, BCM had a mid year ERP implementation in January 2024. After the ERP implementation, management no longer performed the monthly control for the remainder of FY24. As such for 6 months during FY24, the control was not in place. Effect or potential effect: The incorrect indirect cost rate could be applied to a grant. Cause: Management’s internal control over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures for compliance was not consistently documented. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is not a repeat finding Recommendation: The College should reassess its internal controls over the review and approval of indirect cost expenditures post ERP implementation and ensure documentation is retained to evidence review and approval to support the allowability of the expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding and has developed a plan to ensure indirect costs are reviewed.