Findings Citing § 200.303

Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting .34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit two Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements. For both reports submitted, we noted there was no formal review of the reports prior to submission to IDOE. Additionally, we noted that the school reported an amount of $0 for ESSER I, II, and III on the annual data reports submitted for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, which did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($16,924, $402,123, and $620,907, respectively) for the same period. The school also could not provide support for the number of full-time employees (FTE) as of 9/30/22 reported on the Year 3 CrossAct report. Further, we noted that the school reported $0 for ESSER II on the Year 3 report covering the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, which did not agree to the underlying expenditure records ($248,418). The school also could not provide support for the number of full-time employees (FTE) as of 9/30/23 reported on the Year 4 CrossAct report. Identification as a repeat finding: Yes. See Finding 2022-007 in the prior period audit report. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Finding 2024-003 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Information on Federal Program(s) Research & Development Cluster- ALN#10.205 Criteria: Criteria or specific requirement: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. Condition: The University did not maintain complete documentation of price quotes before entering into procurement transactions that exceeded the small purchase threshold. Cause: Administrative oversight and insufficient internal controls. Effect or Potential Effect: Noncompliance with federal procurement standards. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 2 of 40 procurement transactions tested, the University provided sole source justifications which indicated the rationale for not obtaining the required price quotes was that the vendor was on the University’s preferred vendor list. The University policy that was in effect during the fiscal year did not include a preferred vendor list, and we were, therefore, unable to determine how the preferred vendor list was established or maintained. Repeat Finding: No similar findings identified in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the University enhance its policies and procedures to ensure that procurement transactions are appropriately documented. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Programs: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program AL Numbers: 10.533, 10.555 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY2023, FY2024 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Qualified Opinion Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the allowable costs/cost principles compliance requirements. Cause: After June 30, 2024, the School Corporation changed systems used to track time worked for the food service department and is unable to obtain archived records or time sheets to support the hours worked by the food service department personnel. A system of internal controls was not in place to ensure there were appropriate records or audit trails to support time charged to the federal program. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were $19,714 of questioned costs identified. Context: During the testing of internal controls over allowable costs/cost principles, the School Corporation had a system conversion for time entry during the audit period and did not retain copies of the adequate documentation to corroborate the hours worked for food service employees tested. The School Corporation was unable to provide timesheets or records supporting the number of hours charged by each employee for 35 of 35 selections related to hourly employees. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the School Corporation's management establish an internal control process to ensure that detailed records are maintained and an audit trail is evident to comply with federal compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund – Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: (1) Minimum wages. (i) All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or under the United States Housing Act of 1937 or under the Housing Act of 1949 in the construction or development of the project), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics… (3)(ii)(A) The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to the (write in name of appropriate federal agency) if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as the case may be, for transmission to the (write in name of agency). 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week.. . .” Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Effect: The failure to design and implement an effective internal control system enabled material noncompliance to go undetected. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation had one project for HVAC installation and improvements at various buildings which was funded with American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) (84.425U) grant awards. The School Corporation properly included Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements in the vendor contract, however, the School Corporation did not obtain the weekly payroll report certifications from the construction vendor to monitor compliance with the Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements. Therefore, no review was performed to ensure that pay rates complied with the federal wage rate requirements. Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the School Corporation implement a formal process to ensure the required weekly payroll reports certifications are collected and reviewed for projects requiring labor installation and funded by federal grants subject to Davis-Bacon wage rate requirements to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition: No documented internal control process regarding the accuracy of information contained in required performance and FFATA reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Context: No performance reports submitted to the granting agency were documented as being reviewed by management. • Cause: Established policies and procedures do not include documented reviews of performance and FFATA reports. Effect: Performance and FFATA reports are not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Update policies and procedures ensuring performance and FFATA reports are accurately prepared and submitted in accordance with grant deadlines. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition: No documented internal control process regarding the accuracy of information contained in required performance and FFATA reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Context: No performance reports submitted to the granting agency were documented as being reviewed by management. • Cause: Established policies and procedures do not include documented reviews of performance and FFATA reports. Effect: Performance and FFATA reports are not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Update policies and procedures ensuring performance and FFATA reports are accurately prepared and submitted in accordance with grant deadlines. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition: No documented internal control process regarding the accuracy of information contained in required performance and FFATA reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Context: No performance reports submitted to the granting agency were documented as being reviewed by management. • Cause: Established policies and procedures do not include documented reviews of performance and FFATA reports. Effect: Performance and FFATA reports are not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Update policies and procedures ensuring performance and FFATA reports are accurately prepared and submitted in accordance with grant deadlines. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition: No documented internal control process regarding the accuracy of information contained in required performance and FFATA reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Context: No performance reports submitted to the granting agency were documented as being reviewed by management. • Cause: Established policies and procedures do not include documented reviews of performance and FFATA reports. Effect: Performance and FFATA reports are not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Update policies and procedures ensuring performance and FFATA reports are accurately prepared and submitted in accordance with grant deadlines. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Federal Agency: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects Assistance Listing Number: 93.243 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: H79TI080332 (23/24) Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. Condition: No documented internal control process regarding the accuracy of information contained in required performance and FFATA reporting. Questioned costs: N/A Context: No performance reports submitted to the granting agency were documented as being reviewed by management. • Cause: Established policies and procedures do not include documented reviews of performance and FFATA reports. Effect: Performance and FFATA reports are not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: Update policies and procedures ensuring performance and FFATA reports are accurately prepared and submitted in accordance with grant deadlines. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Supply Chain Assistance Program, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in Unified Purchasing Cooperative of the Ohio River Valley (the “Cooperative”), which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation also purchased food and supplies from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $38,261 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the small purchase threshold ($10,000 - $150,000). The School Corporation could not provide documentation showing the bids received from other vendors that were used to compare pricing. Suspension and Debarment For the small purchase vendor noted above that was not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not provide documentation confirming that the vendor was not suspended or debarred before disbursing federal funds during fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Supply Chain Assistance Program, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in Unified Purchasing Cooperative of the Ohio River Valley (the “Cooperative”), which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation also purchased food and supplies from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $38,261 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the small purchase threshold ($10,000 - $150,000). The School Corporation could not provide documentation showing the bids received from other vendors that were used to compare pricing. Suspension and Debarment For the small purchase vendor noted above that was not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not provide documentation confirming that the vendor was not suspended or debarred before disbursing federal funds during fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Supply Chain Assistance Program, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in Unified Purchasing Cooperative of the Ohio River Valley (the “Cooperative”), which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation also purchased food and supplies from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $38,261 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the small purchase threshold ($10,000 - $150,000). The School Corporation could not provide documentation showing the bids received from other vendors that were used to compare pricing. Suspension and Debarment For the small purchase vendor noted above that was not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not provide documentation confirming that the vendor was not suspended or debarred before disbursing federal funds during fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Supply Chain Assistance Program, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in Unified Purchasing Cooperative of the Ohio River Valley (the “Cooperative”), which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation also purchased food and supplies from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $38,261 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the small purchase threshold ($10,000 - $150,000). The School Corporation could not provide documentation showing the bids received from other vendors that were used to compare pricing. Suspension and Debarment For the small purchase vendor noted above that was not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not provide documentation confirming that the vendor was not suspended or debarred before disbursing federal funds during fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: Child Nutrition Cluster - Internal Controls over Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: School Breakfast Program, National School Lunch Program, Supply Chain Assistance Program, Summer Food Service Program Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.559 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): FY 22-23, FY 23-24 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.318(a) states: "The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this part." 2 CFR 200.320 states in part: "The non-Federal Entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. . . . (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. . . ." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the eligibility compliance requirement. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Child Nutrition Program and Procurement compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Procurement and Suspension and Debarment compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: Procurement The School Corporation participates in Unified Purchasing Cooperative of the Ohio River Valley (the “Cooperative”), which procures vendors for food purchases and other supplies on behalf of its members. During the audit period, the School Corporation also purchased food and supplies from vendors not procured by the Cooperative. One vendor with aggregate annual purchases of $38,261 for fiscal year 2024 exceeded the small purchase threshold ($10,000 - $150,000). The School Corporation could not provide documentation showing the bids received from other vendors that were used to compare pricing. Suspension and Debarment For the small purchase vendor noted above that was not procured by the Cooperative and had aggregate annual disbursements exceeding the federal suspension and debarment threshold of $25,000, the School Corporation did not provide documentation confirming that the vendor was not suspended or debarred before disbursing federal funds during fiscal year 2024. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: Yes, see finding 2022-003. Recommendation: We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls related to ensure that the School Corporation’s procurement policy is adhered to and quotes are obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources as required for small purchase method procurements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements.  For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements.  For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management implemented a review control over the annual data reports; however, it was not sufficient enough to detect and prevent errors in annual data reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Effect: Annual data reports submitted during the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education contained material errors compared to underlying transaction detail for the period reported. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the following exceptions in data reporting submissions:  ESSER I Year 4, ESSER II Year 3, and ESSER III Year 3 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 ($0, $360,404, and $12,974, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($60,937, $490,934, and $477,914, respectively).  ESSER II Year 4 and ESSER III Year 4 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 ($57,667 and $363,486, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($361 and $400,473, respectively). Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over the review of annual data reports to ensure the data to be submitted agrees to underlying transaction detail or other supporting documentation prior to the submission of the annual data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements.  For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management implemented a review control over the annual data reports; however, it was not sufficient enough to detect and prevent errors in annual data reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Effect: Annual data reports submitted during the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education contained material errors compared to underlying transaction detail for the period reported. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the following exceptions in data reporting submissions:  ESSER I Year 4, ESSER II Year 3, and ESSER III Year 3 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 ($0, $360,404, and $12,974, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($60,937, $490,934, and $477,914, respectively).  ESSER II Year 4 and ESSER III Year 4 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 ($57,667 and $363,486, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($361 and $400,473, respectively). Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over the review of annual data reports to ensure the data to be submitted agrees to underlying transaction detail or other supporting documentation prior to the submission of the annual data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements.  For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management implemented a review control over the annual data reports; however, it was not sufficient enough to detect and prevent errors in annual data reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Effect: Annual data reports submitted during the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education contained material errors compared to underlying transaction detail for the period reported. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the following exceptions in data reporting submissions:  ESSER I Year 4, ESSER II Year 3, and ESSER III Year 3 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 ($0, $360,404, and $12,974, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($60,937, $490,934, and $477,914, respectively).  ESSER II Year 4 and ESSER III Year 4 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 ($57,667 and $363,486, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($361 and $400,473, respectively). Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over the review of annual data reports to ensure the data to be submitted agrees to underlying transaction detail or other supporting documentation prior to the submission of the annual data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425C, 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425C200018, S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness, Other Matters Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403 establishes principles and standards for determining costs for federal awards carried out through grants, cost reimbursement contracts, and other agreements with state and local governments. To be allowable, under federal awards, cost must meet certain criteria: a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally financed program in either the current or a prior period. g) Be adequately documented. h) Cost must be incurred during the approved budget period. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal Entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School District to ensure compliance with requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund and Activities Allowed or Unallowed. Cause: The School District's management had not developed a system of internal controls that would have ensured compliance with the Activities Allowed or Unallowed compliance requirement. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School District at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: $5,651 (Known questioned costs). Context: During the testing of vendor and payroll disbursements charged to Education Stabilization Fund grant awards during the audit period, the following exceptions were noted:  Management was unable to provide an approved accounts payable voucher and supporting invoice for one vendor disbursement in a sample of 12 vendor disbursements.  For one salaried employee selected out of a sample of 40 payroll disbursements, the employee was charged to Education Stabilization Fund grants for 50% of their time worked in a pay period. The School Corporation did not maintain any time-and-effort logs to support the employee’s partial allocation to Education Stabilization Fund grants. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommended that the School District maintain supporting documentation for vendor and payroll disbursements to support costs charged to the federal grant awards. For payroll disbursements charged to Federal awards, management should maintain time and effort records to support payroll costs allocated to Education Stabilization Grant funds to verify they are allowable and supported by documentation for work performed under the award. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

Information on the federal program: Subject: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund – Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Material Weakness Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ‘Internal Control Integrated Framework’, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the Reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management implemented a review control over the annual data reports; however, it was not sufficient enough to detect and prevent errors in annual data reports submitted to the Indiana Department of Education. Effect: Annual data reports submitted during the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education contained material errors compared to underlying transaction detail for the period reported. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit Annual Data Reports to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) during the audit period to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. We noted that the following exceptions in data reporting submissions:  ESSER I Year 4, ESSER II Year 3, and ESSER III Year 3 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 ($0, $360,404, and $12,974, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($60,937, $490,934, and $477,914, respectively).  ESSER II Year 4 and ESSER III Year 4 expenditures for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023 ($57,667 and $363,486, respectively) did not agree to underlying expenditure records ($361 and $400,473, respectively). Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over the review of annual data reports to ensure the data to be submitted agrees to underlying transaction detail or other supporting documentation prior to the submission of the annual data report. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.

FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, 22619-168-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each school. Although the Proportionate Share Report was prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed and approved by the Special Education Director, the internal controls were not effective to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Special Education Cluster. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the School Corporation has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, the money spent from that object code was less than the total required amount for the Non-Public Proportionate Share per their grant agreements for 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP by $3,499, $5,846, and $8, respectively. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards were $16,570, $5,846, and $679, respectively. Additionally, the School Corporation did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the grant awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Treasurer and the Special Education Director were both new to their positions and did not fully understand the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities that must be met. Effect The lack of proper controls could enable material noncompliance to remain undetected. The School Corporation did not expend the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide necessary training to ensure the School Corporation expends the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, 22619-168-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each school. Although the Proportionate Share Report was prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed and approved by the Special Education Director, the internal controls were not effective to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Special Education Cluster. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the School Corporation has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, the money spent from that object code was less than the total required amount for the Non-Public Proportionate Share per their grant agreements for 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP by $3,499, $5,846, and $8, respectively. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards were $16,570, $5,846, and $679, respectively. Additionally, the School Corporation did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the grant awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Treasurer and the Special Education Director were both new to their positions and did not fully understand the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities that must be met. Effect The lack of proper controls could enable material noncompliance to remain undetected. The School Corporation did not expend the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide necessary training to ensure the School Corporation expends the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, 22619-168-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each school. Although the Proportionate Share Report was prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed and approved by the Special Education Director, the internal controls were not effective to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Special Education Cluster. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the School Corporation has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, the money spent from that object code was less than the total required amount for the Non-Public Proportionate Share per their grant agreements for 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP by $3,499, $5,846, and $8, respectively. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards were $16,570, $5,846, and $679, respectively. Additionally, the School Corporation did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the grant awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Treasurer and the Special Education Director were both new to their positions and did not fully understand the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities that must be met. Effect The lack of proper controls could enable material noncompliance to remain undetected. The School Corporation did not expend the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide necessary training to ensure the School Corporation expends the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, 22619-168-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each school. Although the Proportionate Share Report was prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed and approved by the Special Education Director, the internal controls were not effective to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Special Education Cluster. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the School Corporation has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, the money spent from that object code was less than the total required amount for the Non-Public Proportionate Share per their grant agreements for 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP by $3,499, $5,846, and $8, respectively. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards were $16,570, $5,846, and $679, respectively. Additionally, the School Corporation did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the grant awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Treasurer and the Special Education Director were both new to their positions and did not fully understand the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities that must be met. Effect The lack of proper controls could enable material noncompliance to remain undetected. The School Corporation did not expend the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide necessary training to ensure the School Corporation expends the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, 22619-168-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each school. Although the Proportionate Share Report was prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed and approved by the Special Education Director, the internal controls were not effective to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Special Education Cluster. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the School Corporation has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, the money spent from that object code was less than the total required amount for the Non-Public Proportionate Share per their grant agreements for 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP by $3,499, $5,846, and $8, respectively. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards were $16,570, $5,846, and $679, respectively. Additionally, the School Corporation did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the grant awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Treasurer and the Special Education Director were both new to their positions and did not fully understand the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities that must be met. Effect The lack of proper controls could enable material noncompliance to remain undetected. The School Corporation did not expend the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide necessary training to ensure the School Corporation expends the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-002 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) - Earmarking Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, 22619-168-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities was met for each school. Although the Proportionate Share Report was prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed and approved by the Special Education Director, the internal controls were not effective to ensure nonpublic school expenditures were appropriately identified and reported. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 16 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) During fiscal years 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, the School Corporation was responsible for ensuring and providing oversight of the Special Education Cluster. However, there was inadequate oversight performed by the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with the Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking compliance requirement. Although the School Corporation has a separate object code to identify expenditures for the purpose of proportionate share, the money spent from that object code was less than the total required amount for the Non-Public Proportionate Share per their grant agreements for 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP by $3,499, $5,846, and $8, respectively. The minimum earmarking requirement for the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards were $16,570, $5,846, and $679, respectively. Additionally, the School Corporation did not obtain a waiver from the Indiana Department of Education for the amount unspent for the requirement on the grant awards. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the 22611-168-PN01, 22611-168-ARP, and 22619-168-ARP grant awards. 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.208(b) states in part: "The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, . . ." 511 IAC 7-34-7(b) states: "The public agency, in providing special education and related services to students in nonpublic schools must expend at least an amount that is the same proportion of the public agency total subgrant under 20 U.S.C. 1411(f) as the number of nonpublic school students with disabilities, who are enrolled by their parents in nonpublic schools within its boundaries, is to the total number of students with disabilities of the same age range." Cause The Treasurer and the Special Education Director were both new to their positions and did not fully understand the required level of expenditures for nonpublic school students with disabilities that must be met. Effect The lack of proper controls could enable material noncompliance to remain undetected. The School Corporation did not expend the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 17 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and provide necessary training to ensure the School Corporation expends the required portion for nonpublic school students with disabilities. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 700S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation had not designed an internal control system and procedures to ensure all assets purchased with federal awards were added to the property records or capital asset listing. A property record or capital asset listing would include the following for each asset: a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number (FAIN)), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. The property record or capital asset listing should be maintained for assets purchased that exceed the School Corporation's capitalization threshold. The School Corporation maintained a detailed listing of capital assets; however, the asset records provided for audit did not include all assets purchased with the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund award. An ironworker for the shop class was purchased from the ESSER 3E award for $6,499, but was not reflected on the School Corporation's capital asset ledger. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issued throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: "Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. . . ." Cause The School Corporation hired a third-party to take a physical inventory of the School Corporation's capital assets every two years. The last inventory was taken as of June 30, 2023. Between inventories, the School Corporation maintains records of all assets purchased above $5,000 and reports them to the third-party before the next physical inventory is performed. The School Corporation did not provide documentation of the assets purchased to be provided to the third-party responsible for taking the physical inventory. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system places the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. The lack of adequate capital asset records, which include purchased from federal funds, could allow for the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the program. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation maintain documentation of all capital assets purchased over the $5,000 in between physical inventories taken by the third-party to ensure all assets are properly accounted for and safe guarded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 700S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation had not designed an internal control system and procedures to ensure all assets purchased with federal awards were added to the property records or capital asset listing. A property record or capital asset listing would include the following for each asset: a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number (FAIN)), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. The property record or capital asset listing should be maintained for assets purchased that exceed the School Corporation's capitalization threshold. The School Corporation maintained a detailed listing of capital assets; however, the asset records provided for audit did not include all assets purchased with the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund award. An ironworker for the shop class was purchased from the ESSER 3E award for $6,499, but was not reflected on the School Corporation's capital asset ledger. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issued throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: "Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. . . ." Cause The School Corporation hired a third-party to take a physical inventory of the School Corporation's capital assets every two years. The last inventory was taken as of June 30, 2023. Between inventories, the School Corporation maintains records of all assets purchased above $5,000 and reports them to the third-party before the next physical inventory is performed. The School Corporation did not provide documentation of the assets purchased to be provided to the third-party responsible for taking the physical inventory. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system places the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. The lack of adequate capital asset records, which include purchased from federal funds, could allow for the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the program. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation maintain documentation of all capital assets purchased over the $5,000 in between physical inventories taken by the third-party to ensure all assets are properly accounted for and safe guarded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Equipment and Real Property Management Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 700S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding number was 2022-001. Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation had not designed an internal control system and procedures to ensure all assets purchased with federal awards were added to the property records or capital asset listing. A property record or capital asset listing would include the following for each asset: a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the federal award identification number (FAIN)), who holds title, the acquisition date, cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. The property record or capital asset listing should be maintained for assets purchased that exceed the School Corporation's capitalization threshold. The School Corporation maintained a detailed listing of capital assets; however, the asset records provided for audit did not include all assets purchased with the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund award. An ironworker for the shop class was purchased from the ESSER 3E award for $6,499, but was not reflected on the School Corporation's capital asset ledger. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issued throughout the audit period. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.313(d) states in part: "Management requirements. Procedures for managing equipment (including replacement equipment), whether acquired in whole or in part under a Federal award, until disposition takes place will, as a minimum, meet the following requirements: (1) Property records must be maintained that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of Federal participation in the project costs for the Federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. . . ." Cause The School Corporation hired a third-party to take a physical inventory of the School Corporation's capital assets every two years. The last inventory was taken as of June 30, 2023. Between inventories, the School Corporation maintains records of all assets purchased above $5,000 and reports them to the third-party before the next physical inventory is performed. The School Corporation did not provide documentation of the assets purchased to be provided to the third-party responsible for taking the physical inventory. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system places the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the Equipment and Real Property Management compliance requirement. The lack of adequate capital asset records, which include purchased from federal funds, could allow for the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the program. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation maintain documentation of all capital assets purchased over the $5,000 in between physical inventories taken by the third-party to ensure all assets are properly accounted for and safe guarded. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 19 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $9,625 from ESSER funds, were paid during the audit period. The contracts did not include the required prevailing wage rate clause, nor were the certified payrolls submitted by both the contractors. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages — (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . . (3) Records and certified payrolls — . . . (ii) Certified payroll requirements — (A) Frequency and method of submission. The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly, for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the [write in name of appropriate Federal agency] if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the certified payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, owner, or other entity, as the case may be, that maintains such records, for transmission to the [write in name of agency]. The prime contractor is responsible for the submission of all certified payrolls by all subcontractors. A contracting agency or prime contractor may permit or require contractors to submit certified payrolls through an electronic system, as long as the electronic system requires a legally valid electronic signature; the system allows the contractor, the contracting agency, and the Department of Labor to access the certified payrolls upon request for at least 3 years after the work on the prime contract has been completed; and the contracting agency or prime contractor permits other methods of submission in situations where the contractor is unable or limited in its ability to use or access the electronic system. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non- Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." Cause The School Corporation was unaware of the Davis Bacon Act and its requirements on contracts which use federal funds. This resulted in no internal control for the wage rate requirements for these contracts. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, there were no internal controls to verify compliance for federal funds spent on construction. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls obtained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls should be obtained as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $9,625 from ESSER funds, were paid during the audit period. The contracts did not include the required prevailing wage rate clause, nor were the certified payrolls submitted by both the contractors. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages — (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . . (3) Records and certified payrolls — . . . (ii) Certified payroll requirements — (A) Frequency and method of submission. The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly, for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the [write in name of appropriate Federal agency] if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the certified payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, owner, or other entity, as the case may be, that maintains such records, for transmission to the [write in name of agency]. The prime contractor is responsible for the submission of all certified payrolls by all subcontractors. A contracting agency or prime contractor may permit or require contractors to submit certified payrolls through an electronic system, as long as the electronic system requires a legally valid electronic signature; the system allows the contractor, the contracting agency, and the Department of Labor to access the certified payrolls upon request for at least 3 years after the work on the prime contract has been completed; and the contracting agency or prime contractor permits other methods of submission in situations where the contractor is unable or limited in its ability to use or access the electronic system. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non- Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." Cause The School Corporation was unaware of the Davis Bacon Act and its requirements on contracts which use federal funds. This resulted in no internal control for the wage rate requirements for these contracts. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, there were no internal controls to verify compliance for federal funds spent on construction. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls obtained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls should be obtained as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $9,625 from ESSER funds, were paid during the audit period. The contracts did not include the required prevailing wage rate clause, nor were the certified payrolls submitted by both the contractors. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages — (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . . (3) Records and certified payrolls — . . . (ii) Certified payroll requirements — (A) Frequency and method of submission. The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly, for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the [write in name of appropriate Federal agency] if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the certified payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, owner, or other entity, as the case may be, that maintains such records, for transmission to the [write in name of agency]. The prime contractor is responsible for the submission of all certified payrolls by all subcontractors. A contracting agency or prime contractor may permit or require contractors to submit certified payrolls through an electronic system, as long as the electronic system requires a legally valid electronic signature; the system allows the contractor, the contracting agency, and the Department of Labor to access the certified payrolls upon request for at least 3 years after the work on the prime contract has been completed; and the contracting agency or prime contractor permits other methods of submission in situations where the contractor is unable or limited in its ability to use or access the electronic system. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non- Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." Cause The School Corporation was unaware of the Davis Bacon Act and its requirements on contracts which use federal funds. This resulted in no internal control for the wage rate requirements for these contracts. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, there were no internal controls to verify compliance for federal funds spent on construction. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls obtained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls should be obtained as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-004 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context Construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must pay wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) to their laborers and mechanics. Nonfederal entities are to include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with these requirements and the DOL regulations. This would include a requirement to submit a copy of the payroll and statement of compliance to the entity for each week in which contract work was performed. The School Corporation had not designed nor implemented a system of internal controls to ensure that construction contracts in excess of $2,000 paid from federal grant funds included a prevailing wage rate clause. Two construction contracts, totaling $9,625 from ESSER funds, were paid during the audit period. The contracts did not include the required prevailing wage rate clause, nor were the certified payrolls submitted by both the contractors. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 20 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 29 CFR 5.5 states in part: "(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses . . . (1) Minimum wages — (i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. . . . (3) Records and certified payrolls — . . . (ii) Certified payroll requirements — (A) Frequency and method of submission. The contractor or subcontractor must submit weekly, for each week in which any DBA- or Related Acts-covered work is performed, certified payrolls to the [write in name of appropriate Federal agency] if the agency is a party to the contract, but if the agency is not such a party, the contractor will submit the certified payrolls to the applicant, sponsor, owner, or other entity, as the case may be, that maintains such records, for transmission to the [write in name of agency]. The prime contractor is responsible for the submission of all certified payrolls by all subcontractors. A contracting agency or prime contractor may permit or require contractors to submit certified payrolls through an electronic system, as long as the electronic system requires a legally valid electronic signature; the system allows the contractor, the contracting agency, and the Department of Labor to access the certified payrolls upon request for at least 3 years after the work on the prime contract has been completed; and the contracting agency or prime contractor permits other methods of submission in situations where the contractor is unable or limited in its ability to use or access the electronic system. . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 21 METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NORTH POSEY COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200 Appendix II states in part: "In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity; all contracts made by the non-Federal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. . . . (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non- Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, 'Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction'). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. . . ." Cause The School Corporation was unaware of the Davis Bacon Act and its requirements on contracts which use federal funds. This resulted in no internal control for the wage rate requirements for these contracts. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, there were no internal controls to verify compliance for federal funds spent on construction. As a result, construction contracts entered into did not contain the required wage rate requirements clauses nor were certified payrolls obtained by the School Corporation. Noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirement could result in the loss of future federal funds to the School Corporation Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the School Corporation's management establish a system of internal controls and include the wage rate requirement clause in construction contracts. In addition, certified payrolls should be obtained as required. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Finding number: 2024-003 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Second Education Program: Child Nutrition Cluster – National School Lunch Program ALN #: 10.555 Award number: 13-035 Award year: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Finding: Internal Control and Compliance over Allowability and Reporting Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-003 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria Allowability: Reimbursement for meals served is not based on costs; it is determined solely by applying the applicable meals times rates formula. Financial Reporting: a. Claims for Reimbursement SFAs and sponsors must submit monthly claims for reimbursement for meals and snacks served to eligible students within 60 days following the last day of the month covered by the claim (7 CFR sections 210.8, 220.11, 215.10, and 225.15(c). The state agency has an additional 30 days to submit a consolidated report to FNS (7 CFR 210.5(d), 220.13(b)(2), 215.11(c)(2), and 225.8). b. Recordkeeping Each month’s claim for reimbursement and all data used in the claims review process must be maintained on file. Accurate records must be maintained justifying all meals claimed and documenting that all Program funds were spent only on allowable Child Nutrition Program costs. Failure to maintain such records may be grounds for denial of reimbursement for meals served and/or administrative costs claimed during the period covered by the records in question. Records are required to be retained for a period of three years after submission of the final Claim for Reimbursement for the fiscal year. Or, if audit findings have not been resolved, the records must be retained beyond the three-year period aslong as required for the resolution of the issues raised by the audit. School food authorities are required to make the information available to the Department and the state agency upon request. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our completeness and accuracy testing of the City of Boston Public Schools Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) monthly claims for reimbursement and recordkeeping, which included the allowability of meals reimbursed, we noted that edit checks were performed and documented monthly at the school site level confirming meal count reports. However, out of a sample of 60 days across 12 schools, there were 14 days across 7 schools that did not agree to the underlying manual tally sheets. Additionally, out of a sample of 12 monthly Field Coordinator reviews across 72 school sites, there were 3 reviews where the City was unable to provide evidence that the Field Coordinator’s review and approval took place. Cause This appears to be due to insufficient policies and procedures surrounding the claims for reimbursement and recordkeeping. Effect Meal count reports utilized for the monthly claims for reimbursement are not complete and accuracy, nor do they have complete and accurate underlying records to substantiate the meals requested for reimbursement. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs $108 Recommendation We recommend that FNS enhance their policies and procedures to include a more thorough review and approval of meal counts at the school level to ensure allowability as well as completeness and accuracy of the meal counts submitted for reimbursement. Additionally, we recommend FNS re-enforce their policy to ensure underlying records are maintained in accordance with program requirements. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee FNS agrees with the importance of accurate meal counting and claiming. Because most errors result from arithmetic or data entry mistakes when cafeteria staff record meals served on paper tally sheets and laterenter totals into the computer, we now require that all meals served in the cafeterias be recorded electronically in the POS system at the point of service. We are also exploring ways to use the electronic POS system to record meals that are served in classrooms. The monthly review of school edit check reports by the field coordinators is also now documented using a Google Form that each coordinator is required to complete each month for review by the financial analyst prior to submission of the claim. We will emphasize the importance of proper meal counting and retention of documents during training for cashiers and cafeteria managers.

Finding number: 2024-004 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Second Education Program: Child and Adult Care Food Program ALN #: 10.558 Award number: 13-035-CF-815 Award year: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Finding: Internal Control over Allowability Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria Reimbursement for Operating Costs of Child and Adult Care Centers CACFP centers and sponsors of centers shall be reimbursed solely according to the meals-times-rates formula outlined in II, “Program Procedures.” Costs claimed by the institution as operating costs must be related to preparing and serving meals to children and/or adults under the CACFP (7 CFR 226.11(c) and definition of “operating costs” in 7 CFR 226.2). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing over the allowability of meals reimbursed, we noted that edit checks were performed and documented monthly at the school site level confirming meal count reports. However, out of a sample of 12 monthly Field Coordinator reviews across 72 school sites, there were 3 reviews where the City was unable to provide evidence that the Field Coordinator’s review and approval took place. Cause Field Coordinator edit checks were not precise enough to detect meal count differences for those sites which use a hardcopy tally sheet to count meals priors to entering into the POS system. Additionally, the City was unable to provide documentation showing that the Field Coordinator's review and approval took place in cases. This appears to be due to an insufficient process for documenting and retaining evidence of the Field Coordinator's monthly review. Effect Meal count reports utilized for the monthly claims for reimbursement are not complete and accuracy, nor do they have complete and accurate underlying records to substantiate the meals requested for reimbursement. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs None Recommendation We recommend that FNS enhance their policies and procedures to include a more thorough review and approval of meal counts at the school level to ensure allowability as well as completeness and accuracy of the meal counts submitted for reimbursement. Additionally, we recommend FNS re-enforce their policy to ensure underlying records are maintained in accordance with program requirements. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee FNS agrees with the importance of accurate meal counting and claiming. We have implemented a new standard operating procedure for after-school supper meals served under CACFP that includes more thorough review of meal counts and related documentation prior to submission of the claim, monthly documentation of the edit check review by Field Coordinators using a Google Form, and procedures for holding program and site-based staff accountable for correctly documenting meal counts and submitting paperwork in a timely manner.

Finding number: 2024-005 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-through agency: N/A – Direct Funding Program: CDBG Entitlement/Special Purpose Grants Cluster ALN #: 14.218 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over FFATA Reporting Prior Year Finding: No Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria Under the requirements of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No.109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Public Law 110-252, hereafter referred as the “Transparency Act” that are codified in 2 CFR Part 170, recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reporting should be made in FSRS no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the subaward/subaward amendment obligation was made or the subcontract award/subcontract modification was made. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of the Special Reporting for Federal Funding Accounting and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports, we were unable to verify the review and approval of the FFATA reports by the City Auditor’s Office for 7 out of 7 reports selected for testing. Additionally, we were unable to verify the reports were submitted timely. Cause This appears to be due to lack of a formal documented review over when the FFATA reports were approved and submitted. Effect The City Auditor’s Office has an insufficient process in place to ensure the timely filing of the FFATA reports. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation We recommend that the City Auditor’s Office re-enforce control procedures to ensure that the FFATA reports formal review, approval and submission is documented. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee The City has performed reviews and approvals prior to FFATA reports being submitted, however it has been verbal due to the proximity of the individuals working on this activity. The City will implement Google Calendar meetings and email confirmations once review is completed so that there is documentation of review approval and submission of FFATA reports.

Finding number: 2024-006 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Title I, Grants to Local Education Agencies ALN #: 84.010 Award number: 0305-000549-2024-0035 Award year: September 12, 2023 to September 30, 2025 Finding: Internal Control and Compliance over Payroll Costs Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-006 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; (iv) Encompass both Federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity’s written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; and (vi) Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of allowable costs associated with payroll charges, we noted that the City of Boston Public Schools (BPS) documents time and attendance of employees on daily timesheets signed by the employee, and that these timesheets are approved by the Department Head/Supervisor on a Department Time Summary Report (DTSR). However, for our sample of 60 payroll transactions charged to the program, 3 transactions were not supported by a completed timesheet. Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system for collecting, filing and maintaining supporting documentation for payroll transactions charged to Federal programs. Effect Insufficient review of payroll documentation increases the risk of inaccurate payroll costs being allocated to a grant award. Additionally, BPS is not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1) regarding documentation in support of salaries and wages charge to the federal program. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $13,382, for unsupported payroll charges, were charged to ALN # 84.010, Award No. 0305-000549-2024-0035 Recommendation We recommend that BPS re-enforce its policies and procedures to ensure their review of payroll charges and records are retained to ensure that all payroll costs charged to the federal program are supported by documentation as required by 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1). View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee BPS will add additional guidance around timesheet retention to the trainings for new timekeepers and at the annual payroll training held every August.

Finding number: 2024-007 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Title I, Grants to Local Education Agencies ALN #: 84.010 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-009 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria An SEA and its LEAs must report graduation rate data for all public high schools at the school, LEA, and state levels using the four-year adjusted cohort rate and, at an SEA’s or LEA’s discretion, one or more extended-year adjusted cohort rates. Graduation rate data must be reported both in the aggregate and disaggregated by the subgroups in Section 1111(c)(2) of the ESEA, homeless status, status as a child in foster care using a four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (and any extended-year adjusted cohort rates) (ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25)(20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25). Except as noted below, only students who earn a regular high school diploma may be counted as a graduate for purposes of calculating graduation rates. The term “regular high school diploma” means the standard high school diploma that is awarded to the preponderance of students in the state and that is fully aligned with the state standards (but not to alternate academic achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities) or a higher diploma. A regular high school diploma does not include a recognized equivalent of a diploma, such as a general equivalency diploma (GED), certificate of completion, certificate of attendance, or similar lesser credential (ESEA, Section 8101(43) (20 USC 7801(43). An SEA may, but is not required to, award a state-defined alternate diploma for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who take an alternate assessment aligned with alternate academic achievement standards. That diploma must be standards based, aligned with the state’s requirements for a regular high school diploma, and obtained within the time period for which the state ensures the availability of a free appropriate public education. If an SEA awards an alternate diploma, the SEA may count those students in its four-year and any extended-year adjusted cohort graduation rate, even if the student takes more than four years to receive the alternate diploma (ESEA, Section 8101(23)(A)(ii)(I)(bb), (25)(A)(ii)(I)(bb) (20 USC 7801(23)(A)(ii)(I)(bb), (25)(A)(ii)(I)(bb). To remove a student from the cohort, a school or LEA must confirm, in writing, that the student transferred out, emigrated to another country, transferred to a prison or juvenile facility, or is deceased. To confirm that a student transferred out, the school or LEA must have official written documentation that the student enrolled in another school or in an educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. A student who is retained in grade, enrolls in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted as having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort (ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25) (20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Per the City of Boston Public School’s (BPS) Student Withdrawal Procedures policy, school leaders are required to sign off, via a Google Form, prior to state data submissions in October, March and June that there is sufficient documentation to support all students who have withdrawn from their school. During our testing of 14 public high schools in which BPS is responsible for reporting graduation data, 6 school leaders did not submit their school’s certification for the data submission timeframe selected. Additionally, we noted 2 schools where the school leader provided a certification; however, their certification was not submitted prior to the state’s data submission. Lastly, we noted that for 2 of 60 students removed from their respective cohorts in the Student Information Management System (SIMS) selected for testing, the City of Boston Public Schools (BPS) could not provide any official written documentation that the student emigrated to another country, is deceased, or is enrolled in another school or in an education program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system for collecting school leader’s certifications prior to state submission and insufficient review of supporting documentation before removal of students from the adjusted cohort graduation rate. Effect BPS is potentially misstating the number of students in the adjusted cohorts used by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to determine the 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation BPS management should re-enforce their policy and the requirements with staff related to the removal of students from the adjusted cohorts used to determine the 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate. In addition,BPS management should re-enforce their policies and procedures to obtain and monitor official written documentation of student transfers that is required to remove students from their respective cohort. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee While all school leaders have not completed the certification form, BPS central office staff conduct reviews of all withdrawal documentation prior to state reporting submissions. For any student found to not have sufficient documentation in that testing, central office staff reach out to school leaders to alert them to the issue and instruct them to upload sufficient documentation. If that documentation is not uploaded by a certain date, the withdrawal codes for those students are changed to reflect a dropout status. In this year’s sample of 60 students, BPS was able to produce documentation for 58 students, a marked improvement from previous year’s samples.

Finding number: 2024-008 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Title I, Grants to Local Education Agencies ALN #: 84.010 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Assessment System Security Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-010 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria SEAs, in consultation with LEAs, are required to establish and maintain an assessment system that is valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant professional and technical standards. Within their assessment system, SEAs must have policies and procedures to maintain test security and ensure that LEAs implement those policies and procedures (Title I, Section 1111(b)(2)(B)(iii) of the ESEA (20 USC 6311(b)(2)(B)(iii). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition Each year schools who administer the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) test are required to review and sign the Superintendent’s Assurance of Proper MCAS Test Administration form (Assurance Form), attesting their school will meet all the requirements and test administration protocols as outlined by the City of Boston Public Schools (BPS) and the Massachusetts Department of Secondary Education. During our testing of 16 schools in which BPS is responsible for administering the MCAS test, the form for one school were not obtained. Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system for collecting and retaining school leader’s certifications ensuring they will meet all requirements and test administration protocols.Effect Schools are potentially not following all requirements and protocols related to the administration of the MCAS test and therefore not maintaining an assessment system that is valid, reliable and consistent with professional technical standards. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation BPS management should re-enforce their policy and the requirements to obtain and monitor official written documentation of school’s compliance with the administration of the MCAS test. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee In addition to the superintendent’s assurance form, staff from the Office of Data and Accountability conduct announced and unannounced visits to schools during MCAS testing. These visits include observations of testing locations and test material storage, as well as support when questions arise. Observation notes are stored centrally.

Finding number: 2024-009 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Title I, Grants to Local Education Agencies; Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants); and Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program ALN #: 84.010; 84.367; 84.424 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Participation of Private School Children Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-008 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria For programs funded under Title I, Part A (Assistance Listing 84.010), an LEA, after timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials, must provide equitable services to eligible private school children, their teachers, and their families. Eligible private school children are those who reside in a participating public school attendance area and have educational needs under Section 1115(c) of the ESEA (20 USC 6315(c). The amount of funds an LEA makes available for equitable services under Title I, Part A must be equal to the proportion of funds generated by private school children from low-income families who reside in participating public school attendance areas. An LEA must determine the proportional share available for services for eligible private school children based on the total amount of Title I funds received prior to any expenditures or transfers of funds within the program, such as reservations for administration, parental involvement, and district-wide activities (20 USC 6320(a)(4)(A). LEAs determine the proportional share by multiplying the proportion of children from low-income families who attend private schools and live in participating Title I attendance areas by the LEA’s total Title I allocation (including any funds transferred into Title I). For more information, see Title I, Part A of the ESEA: Providing Equitable Services to Eligible Private School Children, Teachers, and Families (October 7, 2019) (https://oese.ed.gov/files/2020/07/equitable-services-guidance100419.pdf). For programs under Title VIII of the ESEA (Assistance Listing 84.011, 84.365, 84.367, and 84.424), an agency, consortium, or entity receiving financial assistance under an applicable program must provide eligible private school children and their teachers or other education personnel with equitable services or other benefits under the program. Before an agency, consortium, or entity makes any decision that affects the opportunity of eligible private school children, teachers, and other educational personnel to participate, the agency, consortium, or entity must engage in timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials. Expenditures for services and benefits to eligible private school children and their teachers andother education personnel must be equal on a per-pupil basis to the expenditures for participating public school children and their teachers and other educational personnel, taking into account the number and education needs of the children, teachers and other education personnel to be services (Section 8501 of ESEA (20 USC 7881); 34 CFR sections 299.6 through 299.9). The control of funds used to provide equitable services to eligible private school students, teachers and other educational personnel, and families, and title to materials, equipment, and property purchased with those funds must be in a public agency and the public agency must administer the funds, materials, equipment, and property. The provision of equitable services must be by employees of a public agency or through a contract by the public agency with an individual, association, agency, or organization that is independent of the private school. The contract must be under the control of the public agency (Sections 1117(d), and 8501(d) of ESEA (20 USC 6320(d), and 7881(d); section 18005(b) of the CARES Act; 34 CFR sections 76.661, 200.64(b)(3), 200.67, and 299.9). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition ALN 84.010: As part of the City of Boston Public School’s (BPS) policy over compliance with private school funding, we noted the data on children from low-income families who reside in the participating Title I public school attendance area and attend the private school is provided by the private school officials, which is then inputted and calculated by BPS on their Title I application. We were able to verify that the amount of funds available for equitable services for BPS was determined by multiplying the proportion of private school children from low-income families residing in participating public school attendance areas by the LEA’s total Title I, Part A allocation. However, we were unable to confirm completeness and accuracy of the eligible private school children counts used in the calculation as BPS did not retain the correspondence from the schools to support the data ultimately included in their calculation. ALN 84.367 and ALN 84.424: As part of BPS’ policy over compliance with private school funding, we noted the private school student count is provided by the private school officials, which is then inputted and calculated by BPS on their Title II and Title IV applications. We were able to verify that the amount of funds available for equitable services for BPS are equal on a per-pupil basis. However, we were unable to confirm completeness and accuracy of the eligible private school children counts used in the calculation as BPS did not retain the correspondence from the schools to support the data ultimately included in their calculation.Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system in place to ensure retention of all supporting documentation related to compliance with providing equitable services for eligible private school children. Effect BPS is potentially using inaccurate or incomplete data when calculating the amount of funds available for equitable services for eligible private school children. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation When utilizing data provided by private school officials to determine the eligible private school child count, we recommend BPS retain copies of their correspondence to ensure completeness and accuracy of the calculation. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee BPS requests that private schools wishing to participate in receiving Title funds submit detailed student eligibility information, and which is saved to an internal drive, with other supporting documentation pertaining to equitable services compliance. This adjustment to record keeping practice has been instituted beginning with the FY25 grant application cycle.

Finding number: 2024-009 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Title I, Grants to Local Education Agencies; Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants); and Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program ALN #: 84.010; 84.367; 84.424 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Participation of Private School Children Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-008 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria For programs funded under Title I, Part A (Assistance Listing 84.010), an LEA, after timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials, must provide equitable services to eligible private school children, their teachers, and their families. Eligible private school children are those who reside in a participating public school attendance area and have educational needs under Section 1115(c) of the ESEA (20 USC 6315(c). The amount of funds an LEA makes available for equitable services under Title I, Part A must be equal to the proportion of funds generated by private school children from low-income families who reside in participating public school attendance areas. An LEA must determine the proportional share available for services for eligible private school children based on the total amount of Title I funds received prior to any expenditures or transfers of funds within the program, such as reservations for administration, parental involvement, and district-wide activities (20 USC 6320(a)(4)(A). LEAs determine the proportional share by multiplying the proportion of children from low-income families who attend private schools and live in participating Title I attendance areas by the LEA’s total Title I allocation (including any funds transferred into Title I). For more information, see Title I, Part A of the ESEA: Providing Equitable Services to Eligible Private School Children, Teachers, and Families (October 7, 2019) (https://oese.ed.gov/files/2020/07/equitable-services-guidance100419.pdf). For programs under Title VIII of the ESEA (Assistance Listing 84.011, 84.365, 84.367, and 84.424), an agency, consortium, or entity receiving financial assistance under an applicable program must provide eligible private school children and their teachers or other education personnel with equitable services or other benefits under the program. Before an agency, consortium, or entity makes any decision that affects the opportunity of eligible private school children, teachers, and other educational personnel to participate, the agency, consortium, or entity must engage in timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials. Expenditures for services and benefits to eligible private school children and their teachers andother education personnel must be equal on a per-pupil basis to the expenditures for participating public school children and their teachers and other educational personnel, taking into account the number and education needs of the children, teachers and other education personnel to be services (Section 8501 of ESEA (20 USC 7881); 34 CFR sections 299.6 through 299.9). The control of funds used to provide equitable services to eligible private school students, teachers and other educational personnel, and families, and title to materials, equipment, and property purchased with those funds must be in a public agency and the public agency must administer the funds, materials, equipment, and property. The provision of equitable services must be by employees of a public agency or through a contract by the public agency with an individual, association, agency, or organization that is independent of the private school. The contract must be under the control of the public agency (Sections 1117(d), and 8501(d) of ESEA (20 USC 6320(d), and 7881(d); section 18005(b) of the CARES Act; 34 CFR sections 76.661, 200.64(b)(3), 200.67, and 299.9). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition ALN 84.010: As part of the City of Boston Public School’s (BPS) policy over compliance with private school funding, we noted the data on children from low-income families who reside in the participating Title I public school attendance area and attend the private school is provided by the private school officials, which is then inputted and calculated by BPS on their Title I application. We were able to verify that the amount of funds available for equitable services for BPS was determined by multiplying the proportion of private school children from low-income families residing in participating public school attendance areas by the LEA’s total Title I, Part A allocation. However, we were unable to confirm completeness and accuracy of the eligible private school children counts used in the calculation as BPS did not retain the correspondence from the schools to support the data ultimately included in their calculation. ALN 84.367 and ALN 84.424: As part of BPS’ policy over compliance with private school funding, we noted the private school student count is provided by the private school officials, which is then inputted and calculated by BPS on their Title II and Title IV applications. We were able to verify that the amount of funds available for equitable services for BPS are equal on a per-pupil basis. However, we were unable to confirm completeness and accuracy of the eligible private school children counts used in the calculation as BPS did not retain the correspondence from the schools to support the data ultimately included in their calculation.Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system in place to ensure retention of all supporting documentation related to compliance with providing equitable services for eligible private school children. Effect BPS is potentially using inaccurate or incomplete data when calculating the amount of funds available for equitable services for eligible private school children. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation When utilizing data provided by private school officials to determine the eligible private school child count, we recommend BPS retain copies of their correspondence to ensure completeness and accuracy of the calculation. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee BPS requests that private schools wishing to participate in receiving Title funds submit detailed student eligibility information, and which is saved to an internal drive, with other supporting documentation pertaining to equitable services compliance. This adjustment to record keeping practice has been instituted beginning with the FY25 grant application cycle.

Finding number: 2024-009 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Title I, Grants to Local Education Agencies; Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants); and Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program ALN #: 84.010; 84.367; 84.424 Award number: Various Award year: Various Finding: Internal Control over Participation of Private School Children Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-008 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria For programs funded under Title I, Part A (Assistance Listing 84.010), an LEA, after timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials, must provide equitable services to eligible private school children, their teachers, and their families. Eligible private school children are those who reside in a participating public school attendance area and have educational needs under Section 1115(c) of the ESEA (20 USC 6315(c). The amount of funds an LEA makes available for equitable services under Title I, Part A must be equal to the proportion of funds generated by private school children from low-income families who reside in participating public school attendance areas. An LEA must determine the proportional share available for services for eligible private school children based on the total amount of Title I funds received prior to any expenditures or transfers of funds within the program, such as reservations for administration, parental involvement, and district-wide activities (20 USC 6320(a)(4)(A). LEAs determine the proportional share by multiplying the proportion of children from low-income families who attend private schools and live in participating Title I attendance areas by the LEA’s total Title I allocation (including any funds transferred into Title I). For more information, see Title I, Part A of the ESEA: Providing Equitable Services to Eligible Private School Children, Teachers, and Families (October 7, 2019) (https://oese.ed.gov/files/2020/07/equitable-services-guidance100419.pdf). For programs under Title VIII of the ESEA (Assistance Listing 84.011, 84.365, 84.367, and 84.424), an agency, consortium, or entity receiving financial assistance under an applicable program must provide eligible private school children and their teachers or other education personnel with equitable services or other benefits under the program. Before an agency, consortium, or entity makes any decision that affects the opportunity of eligible private school children, teachers, and other educational personnel to participate, the agency, consortium, or entity must engage in timely and meaningful consultation with private school officials. Expenditures for services and benefits to eligible private school children and their teachers andother education personnel must be equal on a per-pupil basis to the expenditures for participating public school children and their teachers and other educational personnel, taking into account the number and education needs of the children, teachers and other education personnel to be services (Section 8501 of ESEA (20 USC 7881); 34 CFR sections 299.6 through 299.9). The control of funds used to provide equitable services to eligible private school students, teachers and other educational personnel, and families, and title to materials, equipment, and property purchased with those funds must be in a public agency and the public agency must administer the funds, materials, equipment, and property. The provision of equitable services must be by employees of a public agency or through a contract by the public agency with an individual, association, agency, or organization that is independent of the private school. The contract must be under the control of the public agency (Sections 1117(d), and 8501(d) of ESEA (20 USC 6320(d), and 7881(d); section 18005(b) of the CARES Act; 34 CFR sections 76.661, 200.64(b)(3), 200.67, and 299.9). Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition ALN 84.010: As part of the City of Boston Public School’s (BPS) policy over compliance with private school funding, we noted the data on children from low-income families who reside in the participating Title I public school attendance area and attend the private school is provided by the private school officials, which is then inputted and calculated by BPS on their Title I application. We were able to verify that the amount of funds available for equitable services for BPS was determined by multiplying the proportion of private school children from low-income families residing in participating public school attendance areas by the LEA’s total Title I, Part A allocation. However, we were unable to confirm completeness and accuracy of the eligible private school children counts used in the calculation as BPS did not retain the correspondence from the schools to support the data ultimately included in their calculation. ALN 84.367 and ALN 84.424: As part of BPS’ policy over compliance with private school funding, we noted the private school student count is provided by the private school officials, which is then inputted and calculated by BPS on their Title II and Title IV applications. We were able to verify that the amount of funds available for equitable services for BPS are equal on a per-pupil basis. However, we were unable to confirm completeness and accuracy of the eligible private school children counts used in the calculation as BPS did not retain the correspondence from the schools to support the data ultimately included in their calculation.Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system in place to ensure retention of all supporting documentation related to compliance with providing equitable services for eligible private school children. Effect BPS is potentially using inaccurate or incomplete data when calculating the amount of funds available for equitable services for eligible private school children. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation When utilizing data provided by private school officials to determine the eligible private school child count, we recommend BPS retain copies of their correspondence to ensure completeness and accuracy of the calculation. View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee BPS requests that private schools wishing to participate in receiving Title funds submit detailed student eligibility information, and which is saved to an internal drive, with other supporting documentation pertaining to equitable services compliance. This adjustment to record keeping practice has been instituted beginning with the FY25 grant application cycle.

Finding number: 2024-010 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Special Education (IDEA) Cluster ALN #: 84.027; 84.173 Award number: 240-714716-2023-0035; 0240-000558-2024-0035 Award year: October 3, 2022 to September 30, 2024; October 2, 2023 to September 30, 2025 Finding: Internal Control and Compliance over Payroll Costs Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-011 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; (iv) Encompass both Federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity’s written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; and (vi) Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that thenon-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of allowable costs associated with payroll charges, we noted that the City of Boston Public Schools (BPS) documents time and attendance of employees on daily timesheets signed by the employee, and that these timesheets are approved by the Department Head/Supervisor on a Department Time Summary Report (DTSR). However, for our sample of 60 payroll transactions charged to the program, 4 DTSR’s were not approved. Additionally, although the DTSR was approved, the transactions were not supported by a completed timesheet for an additional 3 selections. Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system for collecting, filing and maintaining supporting documentation for payroll transactions charged to Federal programs. Effect Insufficient review of payroll documentation increases the risk of inaccurate payroll costs being allocated to a grant award. Additionally, BPS is not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1) regarding documentation in support of salaries and wages charge to the federal program. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $13,149, for unsupported payroll charges Recommendation We recommend that BPS re-enforce its policies and procedures to ensure their review of payroll charges and records are retained and documented to ensure that all payroll costs charged to the federal program are supported by documentation as required by 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1). View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee BPS will add additional guidance around timesheet retention to the trainings for new timekeepers and at the annual payroll training held every August. Additionally, BPS is exploring electronic timesheets, with a pilot focusing on staff that work at multiple sites.

Finding number: 2024-010 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through agency: Commonwealth Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Program: Special Education (IDEA) Cluster ALN #: 84.027; 84.173 Award number: 240-714716-2023-0035; 0240-000558-2024-0035 Award year: October 3, 2022 to September 30, 2024; October 2, 2023 to September 30, 2025 Finding: Internal Control and Compliance over Payroll Costs Prior Year Finding: Yes; 2023-011 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1), charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; (iv) Encompass both Federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity’s written policy; (v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; and (vi) Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 indicates that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that thenon-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition During our testing of allowable costs associated with payroll charges, we noted that the City of Boston Public Schools (BPS) documents time and attendance of employees on daily timesheets signed by the employee, and that these timesheets are approved by the Department Head/Supervisor on a Department Time Summary Report (DTSR). However, for our sample of 60 payroll transactions charged to the program, 4 DTSR’s were not approved. Additionally, although the DTSR was approved, the transactions were not supported by a completed timesheet for an additional 3 selections. Cause This appears to be due to an insufficient system for collecting, filing and maintaining supporting documentation for payroll transactions charged to Federal programs. Effect Insufficient review of payroll documentation increases the risk of inaccurate payroll costs being allocated to a grant award. Additionally, BPS is not in compliance with 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1) regarding documentation in support of salaries and wages charge to the federal program. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs of $13,149, for unsupported payroll charges Recommendation We recommend that BPS re-enforce its policies and procedures to ensure their review of payroll charges and records are retained and documented to ensure that all payroll costs charged to the federal program are supported by documentation as required by 2 CFR 200.430(i)(1). View of Responsible Officials from the Auditee BPS will add additional guidance around timesheet retention to the trainings for new timekeepers and at the annual payroll training held every August. Additionally, BPS is exploring electronic timesheets, with a pilot focusing on staff that work at multiple sites.