Findings Citing § 200.302

Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds- Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department of Human Services Condition: The Organization does not track federal award expenditures separately in its general ledger. ARPA expenditures are commingled with other organizational expenses, making it difficult to directly reconcile federal activity to the SEFA or supporting records. Criteria: 2 CFR §200.302 requires non-federal entities to identify, in their accounts, all federal awards received and expended, and the federal programs under which they were received. The financial management system must provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award. Entities must be able to identify federal awards separately by Assistance Listing number. Cause: The Organization has not implemented an accounting system or chart of accounts structure that captures federal awards separately by Assistance Listing number. Effect: Without separate identification of federal award expenditures, the Organization cannot readily demonstrate allowability of costs, reconcile SEFA expenditures to its accounting system, or ensure compliance with federal cost principles. This increases the risk of misstated SEFA reporting, unsupported expenditures, or disallowed costs. Questioned Costs: None specifically identified during audit testing; however, the lack of a tracking mechanism impairs the Organization’s ability to fully support ARPA expenditures. Auditor’s Recommendation: The Organization should establish accounting procedures to ensure federal award expenditures are tracked separately in the general ledger by Assistance Listing number and by grant. The Organization should reconcile grant expenditures recorded in the general ledger to reimbursement requests and the SEFA on a regular basis.

2024-003 Financial Management Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2021 CONDITION: While performing our audit procedures for FY 24, there were numerous instances of revenue and expense transactions being miscoded between federal grant program funds and expenditures being misclassified on the balance sheet. In addition, reconciliations of grant revenues to grant expenditures were not being performed which could lead to over drawing of federal funds. CRITERIA: 2 CFR 1.200.302(b) Financial Management requires that the financial management system of a non-Federal entity must provide records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. CAUSE: Reconciliation and review of detailed general ledger account balances were not performed in a timely manner during FY 24. EFFECT: Inaccurate and incomplete financial statement reports may be submitted to users of the financial statements, as well as grantor agencies. RECOMMENDATION: All detailed general ledger account balances should be reviewed and reconciled on a monthly basis to ensure complete and accurate financial information is provided to all users of the financial information. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Management have contracted a CPA to work with Financial staff to ensure the accuracy of revenue and expense transactions. CPA will review revenue and expense statements monthly and make any necessary corrections.

Finding 2024-002 – Earmarking Federal Program Information: • Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) – A.L.N.# 17.258/259/278 Criteria: • 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3): Recipients must maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of Federal funds. • 2 CFR 200.327–328: Financial and performance reports must be accurate, current, and complete. • OMB Compliance Supplement (Part 4, earmarking section): Requires that a specified portion of expenditures be used for certain categories, which must be verifiable through the accounting system. Condition: During our testing of earmarking requirements for the WIOA, we were unable to perform the required calculations because the financial data reported to the awarding agency did not reconcile to the County’s underlying accounting records. Due to these identified discrepancies, we were unable to verify earmarking requirements. Context: We selected twelve monthly reports for the WIOA program, and we noted for the reports selected, amounts reported did not agree to the underlying accounting records and thus we could not verify compliance with earmarking requirements. Cause: The County has not implemented effective reconciliation procedures to ensure that reports submitted to the awarding agency agree to the underlying accounting records. Additionally, there is no validation of the accuracy of expenditures reported for earmarking purposes. Effect: Because the submitted reports did not reconcile to the accounting records, we were unable to determine whether the County complied with the earmarking requirements of the program. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the County identify all eligible expenses and revisions prior to reporting submissions so that accurate information is available to ensure compliance with earmarking requirements.

Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name 21.027 U.S Department of the Treasury Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year HB 33 336648 ARPA 2024 Pass through Entity The Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding No Criteria Per 2 CFR 200.302(a)(2)(ii), Uniform Guidance establishes that the recipient is responsible for determining and documenting in procurement procedures an appropriate Simplified Acquisition Threshold, based on internal controls and evaluation of risk, which may be lower than, but must not exceed, the threshold established in the FAR. Additionally, per 2 CFR 200.320(a)(2), if simplified acquisition procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. Condition Controls in place were not adequate to ensure the policy included a well defined Simplified Acquisition Threshold and related procurement method. Additionally, controls were not adequate to ensure price or rate quotations were obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources for contracts above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. Questioned Costs $136,910 If questioned costs are not determinable, description of why known questioned costs were undetermined or otherwise could not be reported N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed Questioned costs represent all costs reported on the SEFA for the contracts in question. Context During testing of contracts procured above the micro purchase threshold, but below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, we noted management did not obtain price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources, as required by Uniform Guidance. Cause and Effect Not defining the Simplified Acquisition Threshold within the System's written policies and procedures, nor establishing the minimum number of required prcie and rate quotations needed could lead to noncompliance with Uniform Guidance and questioned costs. Recommendation Management should implement controls to ensure all procurement policies include specific thresholds for procurement methods in line with Uniform Guidance and that appropriate procurement methods are used for each contract entered into. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Management understands the importance of adhering to procurement thresholds and methods. Procurement policies and grant policies will be updated to include federal thresholds and methods to reflect federal Uniform Guidance. Additionally, the procurement procedures will be amended to include additional review and sign-off from Grant and Purchasing leadership prior to purchases being made with federal funds to ensure price and rate quotations were obtained for contracts above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.

2024 – 001 Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Assistance Listing Number 21.027 14.218 Award Period January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR part 200.303 require that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards (i.e., auditee management) establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Internal Control-Integrated Framework, published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, provides a framework for organizations to design, implement, and evaluate control that will facilitate compliance with the requirements of Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. 2 CFR Subpart D 200.302 (1) and 200.303 (a) stipulates that the auditee must identify, in its accounts, all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal programs and award identification shall include, as applicable, the CFDA title and number, Federal award identification number and year, name of Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity; establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulation, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Controller General of the United State and the "Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee on Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Authority’s schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) did not include the expenditures related to the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and the expenditures related to the Community Development Block Grants on the SEFA as required by Uniform Guidance for federal program 14.218. . Questioned costs: None Context: During the review of revenue for these federal grants, it was discovered and determined that they were not reported on the SEFA. Cause: The Agency was not aware of the requirements to include these expenditures on the SEFA. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with 2 CFR Subpart D 200.302 (1), 200.303 (a). The Agencies’ programs’ expenditures may be disallowed if the expenditures are not reported correctly on the SEFA. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency review current procedures for creating the SEFA to ensure that it is accurately reporting loan balances and expenditures during the year under audit for all federal programs to ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires written procedures for cash management and determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles. Condition: The Organization did not have written procedures for cash management (2 CFR 200.302(b)(6)) and allowable costs determination (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7)) in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: $0 Cause: The Organization’s written policies and procedures were not updated to include required Uniform Guidance policies. Effect: Employees of the Organization could enter into a transaction that is not in compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization draft and adopt written procedures in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding and has developed and will implement the appropriate policies and procedures by December 31, 2025.

2024-001—Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and Federal Grants Monitoring Type of Finding (E) Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance of Federal Awards (H) Instance of Material Non-compliance related to Federal Awards Funding Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) Major Programs Affected Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program; Award: BFRDP-2023-49400-40894 (AL 10.311); Period: 09/15/2023-09/14/2026 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities; Award: USDA/NR243A750004G005 (AL 10.937); Period: 11/02/2023 -11/01/2028 Questioned Costs The Questioned Cost are undetermined. Management has estimated the amount for Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program; Award: BFRDP-2023-49400-40894 (AL 10.311) to be $42,027 and for Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities; USDA/NR243A750004G005 (AL 10.937) to be $33,453. Statement of Condition Quivira implemented a software system (Harvest) to track personnel time spent and expenses for federal programs for the year ended December 31, 2024, but time tracking was not at a level of detail considered sufficient for a properly functioning system of financial reporting. The billing system is not reconciled to the accounting system (QuickBooks) to ensure that all allowable costs are properly tracked, invoiced and reported. This finding appears to be a systemic issue. Also, the Schedule of Federal Awards (“SEFA”) was prepared initially by the Auditor based on revenue rather than expenses due to inconsistencies in recording in the accounting system, which appeared to be a reasonable methodology. Criteria An auditee must prepare a SEFA from its books, including required elements (Assistance Listing, award number, period, pass-through, subrecipient amounts) and maintain financial management systems that allow accurate, timely, and supported reporting (2 CFR 200.510(b); 200.302). Award financial reports (SF-425) must reconcile to the general ledger per award terms. Each grant should have its own general ledger in the accounting system, and the grants billing system should be reconciled regularly with the accounting system. Policies and procedures should be updated to ensure proper reconciliations is done. Cause Quivira has not implemented an effective monthly reconciliation of allowable costs control activity between Harvest and QuickBooks. Effect Quivira was unable to provide a SEFA and a reconciliation to the general ledger. During the audit the billing system was reconciled to the accounting system and multiple errors were discovered. A risk exists that improper tracking and documentation over federal grant awards can lead to instances of noncompliance with grant requirements and inaccurate financial information, which would be used by management, Board of Directors and grantors. Recommendation Quivira should develop and implement a consistent federal grant monitoring process and monthly reconciliation between Harvest and QuickBooks for each federal award. Also, Quivira should improve their policies and procedures by including monthly reconciliations, clearly define the allowable cost under federal rules. Revise budget, if necessary, to reallocate cost, if necessary. Quivira staff should be kept informed about all rules updates under Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions Quivira Coalition has made efforts to fully comply with federal allowable cost rules, including implementing a compliant time and expense system, implementing a compliant accounting system, consulting with federal program officers, and requesting budget revisions when necessary. However, management agrees that despite its efforts it did not correctly attribute allowable non-personnel and personnel costs to the grants, resulting in errors on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Management has analyzed the errors and determined the root causes. Management agrees that the root cause of finding 2024-001 is the discrepancy between the accounting system and time and expenses software system, and that this is material to grant management. After reconciling these discrepancies, as discussed below, management believes the estimated amount for Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program; Award: BFRDP - 2023 - 49400 - 40894 (AL 10.311) to be $7,002 and for Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities; Award: USDA/NR243A750004G005 (AL 10.937) to be $10,169. Non-Personnel Costs Discrepancies in non-personnel costs were primarily caused by human errors. Management conducted a post-audit reconciliation between the expense tracking system (Harvest) and the general ledger (QuickBooks) which identified the 2024 discrepancies, and Quivira has corrected them. Personnel Costs Discrepancies in labor costs were due to three factors: 1) Quivira Coalition personnel are paid for holidays and paid time off (PTO) and therefore personnel costs include PTO and holiday costs in QuickBooks. However, Quivira’s timekeeping system (Harvest) does not burden federal award personnel costs with PTO and holiday costs making it difficult to reconcile. 2) To allocate personnel costs to a grant, Quivira used the Harvest system. This system calculates a fixed cost rate for each person based on their total annual compensation and expected work capacity and then multiplies this fixed cost rate by the number of hours worked on each grant (as recorded in the Harvest System). However, using fixed cost rates can result in misallocation in situations where personnel work over capacity (e.g. overtime) or under capacity. The appropriate cost allocation approach for salaried employees is to allocate actual personnel costs for a task based on the percentage of total hours worked. 3) Quivira calculated personnel fringe costs based on an estimated hourly fringe rate rather than identifying and allocating actual fringe expenses from QuickBooks. To correct for this material weakness, Quivira Coalition will: Action Step Detail Date Responsible Party Develop a new, compliant method to allocate personnel costs for federal billing and reporting. Stop using the timekeeping system (Harvest) for allocation. The new method must properly reflect actual paid salaries, paid fringe, and actual time spent. 12/31/2025 Accounting Firm Update reporting process to reconcile all costs reported on the SF-425 to the general ledger (instead of the timekeeping system) using the new federal grants billing process. Keep detailed records of the reconciliation. 12/31/2025 Accounting Firm Implement a monthly reconciliation process between the time and expense system (Harvest) and the QuickBooks general ledger to reconcile all non-personnel expenses. 1/31/2026 Operations Director Document the grant management process, including new reporting processes, required reconciliations, monitoring policies, and allowable cost management to ensure consistency across the organization. 2/28/2026 Operations Director Update policies and procedures to require that expenses reported on the SEFA form come directly from the accounting system to ensure this continues. 1/31/2026 Operations Director Update policies and procedures to require an annual reconciliation between the SF-425 and SEFA reports to ensure this continues. This occurs before submitting the SEFA report. 1/31/2026 Operations Director Reconcile all grant programs active in 2024 and 2025 using updated processes and resolve any discrepancies with federal reports or billing. 2/28/2026 Initial Review - Operations Director & Grants Manager Secondary Review & Corrections (if needed) - Accounting Firm Develop a plan to ensure regular and sufficient training on Uniform Guidance tracking regulatory changes, and how to implement changes. Update policies and procedures. 11/30/2025 Operations Director & Executive Director Update policies and procedures to require an additional level of review and approval for SF-425 and SEFA reports and reconciliations for accuracy and completeness before they are submitted. 12/31/2025 Operations Director with final approval from the Executive Director

Repeat finding: There was a simialr finding in the prior year, but it related to a different program and was assessed to be a significant deficiency. Condition: During our testing of payments charged to the federal major program, we noted that employee timesheets lacked evidence of review and approval. Certain employees charged to the grant did not prepare timesheets and a separate tracking system was used. Federal regulations require that expenditures charged to Federal awards be properly reviewed, approved, and documented to ensure allowability and compliance with grant terms. Criteria: Under the Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.430, charges to Federal awards for compensation must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that costs are allocated appropriately and accurately. Per 2 CFR §200.403, allowable costs must be "necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented." Additionally, 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3) requires non- Federal entities to maintain records that sufficiently detail financial transactions to support Federal expenditures. Cause: The Federal program was new to the organization and controls over the program had not been fully established. Turnover in the accounting department contributed to the lack of resources for tracking these costs. Effect: Management provided documentation on personnel costs allocated to the program, but was unable to provide evidence of review. Lack of review increases the risk of unauthorized or unallowable costs being charged to the Federal award, potentially leading to questioned costs and noncompliance with Federal grant requirements. Context: This issue applied to approximately 50% of the compensation costs charged to the grant expenditures. Management performed time studies on some of the employees whose costs were shared among programs, and the local granting organization did not cite this as a finding in their review of their subrecipient’s activities. Recommendation: Management should review the requirements of CFR 200.430 and ensure that current processes, whether digital or hard-copy driven, are consistent with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. In addition, management should consider adding additional staff to its accounting and/or grants management team. Views or reponsible officials: Management will evaluate systems and processes to ensure time tracking procedures meet the standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance.

Significant Deficiency 2024-002 Pandemic Relief Activities: Local Food Purchase Agreements with States, Tribes, and Local Governments – Allowable Cost and Cost Principles Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Agriculture (Federal Assistance Listing Number 10.182). Criteria: CFR Section 200.302 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the Organization does not have evidence of review of expenses charged to the grant. Statement of Cause: The Organization did not review compliance requirements related to allowable cost and cost principles outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.302. Statement of Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.302. The Organization does not have evidence of review and is therefore not performing required procedures that would be standard for all purchases charged to the program. Questioned Costs: None. Perspective Information: As part of the required allowable cost testing, inquiries are made of the Organization’s management as to any internal control policies that the Organization has. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.302 to follow their internal control policies. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Think Regeneration, NFP will develop and implement a written procurement policy in accordance with CFR Section 200.302. We will have this in place as soon as possible.

2024-001 PREPARATION OF THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS AL Number and Title: 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Grantor Name: United States Department of the Treasury Pass Through Entity: Washington State Department of Commerce Criteria: Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.302 - Financial Management, requires a federal award recipient to maintain a financial management system that provides for the identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. Condition: CCAP did not prepare a complete and accurate Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the year ending December 31, 2024. Cause: CCAP did not design and implement effective internal controls to ensure the accurate identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Effect: CCAP did not maintain a financial management system to allow for the accurate identification of all federal awards received and expended and the Federal program under which they were received. Significant adjustments totaling $1,352,645 were required to correct the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the year ended December 31, 2024. Failure to accurately identify all Federal awards received and expended increases the risk that errors or noncompliance with Federal award requirements could occur and not be detected and corrected in a timely manner. Auditor’s Recommendation: CCAP should design and implement internal controls to ensure the identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. This includes creating formally documented policies and procedures that detail the process for identifying federal funding sources and maintaining source documentation such as grant award agreements, budgets, and other relevant financial management documents that help ensure compliance with Federal requirements. Questioned Costs for Finding 2024-001: No questioned costs were noted for this finding.

Significant Deficiency Coronovirus State and Local Funds – Allowable Cost/Activity/Period of Performance 2024-002 Information on Federal Program: U.S. Department of Treasury (Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027). Criteria: CFR Section 200.302 stipulates that a non-Federal entity must use its own written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Supart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Statement of Condition: During our discussions with management, we noted that the Organization does not have documented internal procedures in place. Statement of Cause: The Organization did not review compliance requirements related to allowable cost outlined in 2 CFR Section 200.302. Statement of Effect: The Organization is not in compliance with 2 CFR Section 200.302. The Organization does not have documented procedures and is therefore not performing required procedures that would be standard for all purchases charged to the program. Questioned Costs: None. Perspective Information: As part of the required allowable cost testing, inquiries are made of the Organization’s management as to any internal control policies that the Organization has. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review the requirements of 2 CFR Section 200.302 to develop internal control policies to be followed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: City of Aledo will develop and implement a internal control policy in accordance with CFR Section 200.302. We will have this in place as soon as possible.

FINDING 2024-004 Subject: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Assistance Listings Number: 10.760 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 92-02, 92-03, 92-04, 92-05 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the City was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The City had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The City was required to submit two annual data reports to the Department of Agriculture. The Statement of Budget, Income and Equity (Form RD 442-2) report data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current income and expenditures and budgeted amounts. The Balance Sheet (Form RD 442-3) report data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current year assets and liabilities. Per the USDA Rural Utilities Service Borrower's Guide, both reports also required inclusion of comparative information for the prior year. Both reports were selected for testing. We were unable to trace either report to the City's records, nor could we verify the accuracy and completeness of either report. The following errors were identified: • The Form RD 442-2, which covered calendar year 2023, reported total income and expenses of $3,792,018 and $1,615,582, respectively. However, the City's ledger for the same period had total income and expenses of $3,985,851 and $3,740,788, respectively. This resulted in net income being overstated by $2,319,039. Additionally, only one amount was reported as comparative data for prior year activity. We were unable to determine what this amount represented and were unable to verify it to the prior period report or to the City's records. • The Form RD 442-3, which covered calendar year 2023, reported total assets and liabilities of $18,229,653 and $10,503,419, respectively. However, the City's records for the same period had total assets and liabilities of $39,216,648 and $12,758498, respectively. Additionally, no comparative amounts from the prior year were reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 7 CFR 1780.47 states in part: "(a) Borrowers are required to provide RUS an annual audit or financial statements. . . . (e) Borrowers exempt from audits. All borrowers who are exempt from audits, will, within 60 days following the end of each fiscal year, furnish the RUS with annual financial statements, consisting of a verification of the organization's balance sheet and statement of income and expense by an appropriate official of the organization. Forms RD 442-2, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity,' and 442-3 may be used. (f) Management reports. These reports will furnish management with a means of evaluating prior decisions and serve as a basis for planning future operations and financial strategies. In those cases where revenues from multiple sources are pledged as security for an RUS loan, two reports will be required; one for the project being financed by RUS and one combining the entire operation of the borrower. In those cases where RUS loans are secured by general obligation bonds or assessments and the borrower combines revenues from all sources, one management report combining all such revenues is acceptable. The following management data will be submitted by the borrower to the processing office. These reports at a minimum will include a balance sheet and income and expense statement. . . . (2) Annual management reports. Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year the following will be submitted to the processing office. (If Form RD 442-2 is used as the annual management report, enter data in column three only of Schedule 1, and complete all of Schedule 2.) • The Form RD 442-3, which covered calendar year 2023, reported total assets and liabilities of $18,229,653 and $10,503,419, respectively. However, the City's records for the same period had total assets and liabilities of $39,216,648 and $12,758498, respectively. Additionally, no comparative amounts from the prior year were reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 7 CFR 1780.47 states in part: "(a) Borrowers are required to provide RUS an annual audit or financial statements. . . . (e) Borrowers exempt from audits. All borrowers who are exempt from audits, will, within 60 days following the end of each fiscal year, furnish the RUS with annual financial statements, consisting of a verification of the organization's balance sheet and statement of income and expense by an appropriate official of the organization. Forms RD 442-2, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity,' and 442-3 may be used. (f) Management reports. These reports will furnish management with a means of evaluating prior decisions and serve as a basis for planning future operations and financial strategies. In those cases where revenues from multiple sources are pledged as security for an RUS loan, two reports will be required; one for the project being financed by RUS and one combining the entire operation of the borrower. In those cases where RUS loans are secured by general obligation bonds or assessments and the borrower combines revenues from all sources, one management report combining all such revenues is acceptable. The following management data will be submitted by the borrower to the processing office. These reports at a minimum will include a balance sheet and income and expense statement. . . . (2) Annual management reports. Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year the following will be submitted to the processing office. (If Form RD 442-2 is used as the annual management report, enter data in column three only of Schedule 1, and complete all of Schedule 2.)• The Form RD 442-3, which covered calendar year 2023, reported total assets and liabilities of $18,229,653 and $10,503,419, respectively. However, the City's records for the same period had total assets and liabilities of $39,216,648 and $12,758498, respectively. Additionally, no comparative amounts from the prior year were reported. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 7 CFR 1780.47 states in part: "(a) Borrowers are required to provide RUS an annual audit or financial statements. . . . (e) Borrowers exempt from audits. All borrowers who are exempt from audits, will, within 60 days following the end of each fiscal year, furnish the RUS with annual financial statements, consisting of a verification of the organization's balance sheet and statement of income and expense by an appropriate official of the organization. Forms RD 442-2, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity,' and 442-3 may be used. (f) Management reports. These reports will furnish management with a means of evaluating prior decisions and serve as a basis for planning future operations and financial strategies. In those cases where revenues from multiple sources are pledged as security for an RUS loan, two reports will be required; one for the project being financed by RUS and one combining the entire operation of the borrower. In those cases where RUS loans are secured by general obligation bonds or assessments and the borrower combines revenues from all sources, one management report combining all such revenues is acceptable. The following management data will be submitted by the borrower to the processing office. These reports at a minimum will include a balance sheet and income and expense statement. . . . (2) Annual management reports. Prior to the beginning of each fiscal year the following will be submitted to the processing office. (If Form RD 442-2 is used as the annual management report, enter data in column three only of Schedule 1, and complete all of Schedule 2.) (i) Two copies of the management reports and proposed 'Annual Budget'. (ii) Financial information may be reported on Form RD 442-2 which includes Schedule 1, 'Statement of Budget, Income and Equity' and Schedule 2, 'Projected Cash Flow' or information in similar format. (iii) A copy of the rate schedule in effect at the time of submission. . . ." Cause The Clerk-Treasurer had served in the position for less than two years when the reports for 2024 were due and was inexperienced with the reporting requirements of the award. As a result, the Clerk-Treasurer did not properly prepare the reports. Additionally, the Clerk-Treasurer was solely responsible for preparing and submitting the reports with no oversight, review, or approval process that would have allowed for prevention, or detection and correction, of the noncompliance. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the City did not file an accurate and complete report for either annual report required under the federal award. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. By not reporting the comparative data, all information needed to determine the financial status of the City was not readily available. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement reporting policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are filed timely, accurately, and contain all the required information. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-006 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): 2024 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Condition and Context As part of sound management of the federal award, the City was responsible for implementing a system of internal controls that would ensure compliance with the applicable requirements. The City had not properly designed or implemented such a system, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The City was required to submit an annual Project and Expenditure (P&E) report to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The P&E report data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period and total cumulative obligations and current period and total cumulative expenditures. We were unable to trace the annual P&E report to the City's records. The errors identified were as follows: • Total cumulative obligations were overstated by $23,337. • Total cumulative expenditures were understated by $171,136. • Current period expenditures were understated by $163,789. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 31 CFR 35.4(c) states in part: "Reporting and requests for other information. During the period of performance, recipients shall provide to the Secretary periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, . . ." Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Compliance and Reporting Guidance, page 10, states in part: ". . . 10. Reporting. All recipients of federal funds must complete financial, performance, and compliance reporting as required and outlined in Part 2 of this guidance. Expenditures may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and consistently applied. Reporting must be consistent with the definition of expenditures pursuant to 2 CFR 200.1. Your organization should appropriately maintain accounting records for compiling and reporting accurate, compliant financial data, in accordance with appropriate accounting standards and principles. . . ." Cause The Clerk-Treasurer had served in the position for two years when the report for 2024 was due and was inexperienced with the reporting requirements of the award. As a result, the Clerk-Treasurer did not properly prepare the report. Additionally, the Clerk-Treasurer was solely responsible for preparing and submitting the report with no oversight, review, or approval process that would have allowed for prevention, or detection and correction, of the noncompliance. Effect Without a proper system of internal controls in place that operated effectively, the City did not file an accurate annual P&E report as required under the federal award. As a result, material noncompliance occurred and remained undetected. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the City. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that the City's management establish a proper system of internal controls and develop and implement reporting policies and procedures to ensure that all required reports are complete and accurate when submitted. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Finding 2025-001: Cash Management (Material Weakness) Federal Program: Grants to Provide Outpatient Early Intervention Services with Respect to HIV Disease (Ryan White Part C). [93.918] Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Criteria: Effective internal controls require an entity to have a financial management system that provides accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of a federally assisted project (2 CFR § 200.302). Drawdown requests must be based on actual incurred expenditures and be properly reviewed for accuracy before submission to minimize the time between draw and disbursement (2 CFR § 200.305). Additionally, the entity must maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of funds for all federally assisted activities (2 CFR § 200.333). Condition: During our audit of the financial management system and cash management practices for the Ryan White Federal Program, we identified the following deficiencies: Transposed Drawdown Amount: A drawdown request submitted to the PMS system for the Ryan White Program had the requested amount transposed with the amount of another federal program. This resulted in an over-request of a material amount on the Ryan White Program. Duplicate Invoice Reimbursement: An invoice was requested and received for reimbursement on a prior drawdown and was subsequently included again in a draw after year-end, resulting in a duplicate reimbursement. Incomplete Expenditure Tracking: The entity did not have a complete system for tracking all expenditures eligible for reimbursement. The drawdown process was limited to cash disbursement and payroll transactions and excluded expenditures incurred and recorded by journal entries. This resulted in the entity having unreimbursed expenditures that could have offset the over-requests noted above. Questioned Costs: $252,567 The questioned costs consist of the material amount over-requested in the transposed drawdown and the duplicate reimbursement of the previously paid invoice. A detailed breakdown is as follows: Over-requested amount due to transposed data: $150,516 Duplicate reimbursement for invoice submitted twice: $102,051 Cause: The organization's internal controls over the cash management and drawdown request process were inadequate. Specifically, there was a lack of a formal review and approval process to verify the accuracy and completeness of drawdown requests before they were submitted. Effect: The deficiencies in internal control led to material noncompliance with federal regulations related to financial management and cash management. This resulted in the entity holding federal funds in excess of immediate needs, which is a violation of the terms and conditions of the federal award. The inadequate financial management system also prevented the entity from accurately tracking and requesting all eligible expenditures, which could have helped offset the over-draws. Context: This is a systemic finding. Repeat Finding: No. This is the first time this specific finding has been identified. Recommendation: The entity should implement robust internal controls to ensure all drawdown requests are reviewed and approved by a second person with authority. A reconciliation of expenditures to the general ledger should be performed before each drawdown to ensure all eligible costs are included and that no duplicate requests are made. The entity’s cash management policies and procedures should be updated to address these deficiencies and ensure compliance with federal requirements. Management Response: The organization acknowledges and we are committed to remediation. To correct the deficiency, we are implementing a plan focused on establishing a review and approval process for all drawdown requests and revising our policies to ensure that all eligible incurred expenditures are properly captured and reconciled, thereby assuring strict compliance with federal cash management regulations and preventing federal funds from exceeding our immediate needs.

Finding 2024-002 Lack of Supporting Documentation for Disbursements (Including Credit Card Transactions) Condition: During our testing of disbursements, including credit card transactions, we identified several instances where supporting invoices or receipts were missing or incomplete. In these cases, the organization was unable to provide sufficient documentation to substantiate the nature, purpose, or business justification of the expenditures charged to federal programs. Criteria: The Uniform Guidance requires that costs charged to federal awards be necessary, reasonable, allocable, and adequately documented. Specifically, §200.403(g) states that a cost is allowable only if it is adequately documented, and §200.302(b)(3) requires recipients to maintain records that identify the source and application of funds for federally funded activities.Questioned Costs: The total questioned costs cannot be determined due to lack of adequate supporting documentation.Cause: This issue occurred due to inadequate internal controls over the documentation and retention of support for disbursements. Management has not fully implemented procedures to ensure all expenditures are properly supported before being approved or charged to a federal program.Effect: Without proper supporting documentation, there is an increased risk that unallowable or unsupported costs were charged to the federal award. This condition could result in repayment of disallowed costs, noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance, and potential impact on future federal funding.Recommendation: We recommend that management: 1. Implement a formal written policy requiring original invoices or receipts to be obtained and reviewed for every disbursement, including credit card purchases, prior to payment or cost allocation to a federal award. 2. Ensure that documentation is reviewed and approved by an individual independent of the preparer or cardholder. 3. Maintain supporting documentation in accordance with the record retention requirements of 2 CFR §200.334. 4. Provide staff training on the documentation requirements for allowable costs under the Uniform Guidance.Views of Responsible Officials: We concur with this finding. The organization acknowledges that complete documentation is essential to substantiate the nature, purpose, and justification of all expenditures, particularly those funded by federal awards.

Finding Type: Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance and compliance Federal Agency and Passed-through Entity: U.S. Department of Treasury, passed through Kitsap County Federal Program Title and AL Number: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (21.027) Criteria: Retaining proper documentation of the execution of internal controls is critical to allow management and those charged with governance conduct their monitoring activities. Along with all other business transactions, there should be thorough accounting and proper tracking of all credit card reimbursements and payments. 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3) requires recipients and subrecipients to maintain "records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation." Condition: Management could not provide supporting evidence for 1 non-payroll item from our sample selection. Also, management did not retain evidence of the Organization’s review and/or authorization of the reimbursement of credit card purchases to ensure that the credit card charges were allowable. We could not obtain documented evidence of such review/authorization for a total of 40 items selected in our sample. Cause: Not all processes and controls adopted by the Organization were found to be fully documented. Effect: When internal controls are not documented, the ability of management and those charged with governance to conduct monitoring activities gets compromised. Management and those charged with governance cannot ascertain that the controls are operating timely and effectively throughout the year when the execution of the internal controls is not documented. Unallowed costs could go undetected by management. Questioned Costs: None Repeated finding: No Recommendation: Management should document the review and/or authorization of credit card charges and reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials: Management concurs with the finding and the recommendation. Please refer to the corrective action plan attached

Finding 2024-001: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects (Section 223(f)/207) Statement of Condition: Internal control processes over financial reporting did not ensure that all transactions were properly recorded. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4370.2, Chapter 2 requires the books and accounts to be complete and accurate. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200 Section 200.302 Financial Management states that the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award in accordance with the reporting requirements. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200 Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions. Effect: Noncompliance with HUD and Uniform Guidance regulations. Cause: Management oversight. Context: A review of journal entries made during the year revealed journal entries made in the incorrect period and erroneous journal entries. Additionally, the review process of the Corporation's financial information did not discover these errors. Recommendation: We recommend management review/enhance its accounting and internal control procedures to ensure that all key accounts are reconciled and reviewed with supporting evidence of such review. Questioned Costs: N/A Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding and will review the accounting and financial procedures, system of internal controls and policies.

Assistance Listing Number: 10.728 Name of Federal Program: Inflation Reduction Act Hazardous Fuels Transportation Assistance Name of Federal Agency: Department of Agriculture Award Period: January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CFR Part 200, non-federal entities receiving federal award must establish and maintain written policies and procedures addressing areas including, but not limited to, cash management (§200.302(b)(6)), allowability of costs (§200.302(b)(7)), procurement (§200.318-.326), compensation (§200.430(a)(1)), and fringe benefits (§200.431). Condition: ALC has not implemented all policies and procedures required by 2CFR Part 200, such as cash management, allowability of costs, procurement, compensation, and fringe benefits. Cause: ALC has not detailed its policies to conform with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Procurement policies and procedures have not been designed and implemented that adhere to Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: Without documented and implemented policies and procedures, ALC increases the risk of noncompliance with federal regulations, inconsistent application of requirements, unallowable costs being charged to federal awards, and potential questioned costs Context: Policies and procedures were inspected for compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: ALC should develop, formally adopt, and implement all Uniform Guidance policies and procedures. Policies should be documented, communicated to relevant staff, and periodically reviewed to ensure ongoing compliance. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding and will implement procurement policies and procedures.

Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs Finding 2024-006: Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Allowable Costs - Inadequate Chart of Accounts Segregation for Unallowable Costs (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3), non-Federal entities must maintain records that adequately identify the source and application of funds and must segregate unallowable costs to ensure compliance with cost principles. Condition: The chart of accounts does not sufficiently segregate unallowable costs from allowable program expenditures. Certain unallowable expenditures were coded to general operating accounts without clear differentiation. Cause: The Center lacks a detailed coding structure and written policies requiring explicit identification and segregation of unallowable costs. Effect: There is increased risk that unallowable costs could be charged to Federal awards, leading to potential noncompliance, questioned costs, or improper reimbursement requests. Recommendation: Management should implement a revised chart of accounts that clearly differentiates allowable vs. unallowable costs, supported by updated written policies and staff training. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.

Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs (Cont.) Finding 2024-007: Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Allowable Costs - Insufficient Budget-to-Actual Reviews (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.302(b)(5) and established internal control frameworks such as COSO, entities must compare actual expenditures to budgeted amounts to ensure proper financial management and compliance with award terms. Condition: Budget-to-actual analyses were not consistently performed or documented for certain Federal programs. Cause: The Center lacks a formalized review schedule and adequate documentation procedures. Effect: Failure to identify variances may result in overspending, underspending, or misclassification of Federal program costs. Recommendation: Management should implement formal, periodic budget-to-actual reviews supported by standardized documentation requirements. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.

Section III – Major Federal Awards Programs – Findings and Questioned Costs (Cont.) Finding 2024-011: Reporting - Insufficient Policies to Ensure Completeness and Accuracy of Reports (Material Weakness) Federal Program : Grants for Transportation of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas Assistance Listing Number : 64.035 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.328 and 200.302(b)(2), entities must maintain internal controls to ensure that financial and performance reports are accurate, complete, and supported by appropriate documentation. Condition: Reports submitted for Federal awards were not consistently reviewed for accuracy, and review procedures were not documented. Cause: The Center lacks a formal reporting policy and does not have a documented review process in place. Effect: There is an increased risk of inaccurate reporting to Federal awarding agencies, which may impact funding decisions and compliance status. Recommendation: Management should establish a formal reporting policy requiring documented supervisory reviews prior to the submission of financial and performance reports. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.

2 CFR § 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2) requires non-federal entities to have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the competitive proposals receive and for selecting contract recipients. 2 CFR 200.319(d) requires non-federal entities to have written procedures for procurement transactions to ensure all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured and identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The Village was awarded grant monies under the Uniform Guidance (UG); however, the Village did not establish formal written policies required by the UG for the sections listed above. To help ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements, the Village should establish and maintain timely updated policies and, more importantly, implement procedure as specified by UG requirements for all grant monies received. Any changes to the Village's policies should also be formally approved by Council and documented within the minutes.

Finding 2024-003: 93.591 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalitions Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Noncompliance Criteria: According to 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(5), non-federal entities must have written procedures to ensure that expenditures are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the federal award. Furthermore, entities are expected to compare actual expenditures with budgeted amounts for each federal award. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Organization does not maintain or regularly review a budget-to-actual comparison for expenditures charged to the federal grant. As a result, management is unable to assess whether spending is aligned with the approved grant budget. Effect: Failure to monitor expenditures against the approved grant budget increases the risk of unallowable costs, budget overruns, and noncompliance with grant terms, which may result in questioned costs or potential repayment of funds. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The Organization has not established internal procedures or systems to monitor grant expenditures against the approved budget. _x000C_Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement a process to compare actual expenditures to the approved grant budget on a regular basis. This may include monthly or quarterly reviews by program and finance staff to ensure expenditures remain within approved categories and thresholds. Documentation of such reviews should be maintained to demonstrate compliance.

Finding 2024-004: 93.591 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Family Violence Prevention and Services/State Domestic Violence Coalitions Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Material Weakness in Internal Control and Noncompliance Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.403(g), costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under a federal award. Additionally, per 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3), recipients must maintain records that identify the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. Furthermore, effective internal controls per 2 CFR §200.303 require that transactions be properly authorized and reviewed to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. Condition: During our testing of expenses charged to the federal award, we reviewed a sample of 10 transactions totaling $9,284. Of those, 7 transactions (representing $8,980) were found to be noncompliant due to one or both of the following: • Missing supporting documentation, such as receipts or invoices • Missing approval documentation, such as required supervisor sign-offs These issues impaired our ability to determine whether the expenses were allowed, reasonable, and allocable under the terms of the award. Due to the high rate of errors, we performed extrapolation procedures over the population of similar expenses totaling $107,782. Based on the sample error rate and our extrapolation methodology, we estimate that $36,846 of the total expenses charged to the federal award may be unallowable and are thus considered extrapolated questioned costs. Effect: As a result of insufficient supporting and approval documentation, the allowability of a significant portion of expenses charged to the federal award could not be determined. This has led to an extrapolated questioned cost of $36,846. Questioned Costs: $36,846 (extrapolated) Cause: The deficiencies noted appear to be the result of weak internal controls related to documentation and approval workflows for federal expenditures. Specifically, the Organization does not appear to have a consistent process to: • Ensure documentation is retained for all expenses • Verify and record supervisory or grant-related approvals Recommendation: We recommend the Organization take immediate steps to improve internal controls related to documentation and record retention for federal program expenditures. The Organization should ensure that all expenses charged to the federal award are supported with adequate documentation. Additionally, the Organization should also ensure approvals are properly documented regardless if the expense is paid by check or electronic payment.

2024-005 – Insufficient Financial Management Condition: The Organization drew down more revenues than expenditures incurred. Criteria: The VA Staff Sergeant Parker Gordon Fox Suicide Prevention Grant Program regulations (38 CFR Part 78) and the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.302) require grantees to maintain a financial management system that provides accurate, current, and complete financial information, effective control over federal funds, and adequate documentation supporting all costs charged to the program. Financial management is considered insufficient when accounting practices do not ensure timely, accurate, and supported reporting of expenditures and drawdowns. Effect: Failure to maintain accurate financial data will result in discrepancies between expenditures and draw-downs. It also increases the risk of inaccurate financial results provided at closeout or unauthorized or ineligible expenses charged to the award, which may result in funding shortages for other qualified expenses. Cause: Homeward Bound Adirondack, Inc. failed to provide adequate oversight and internal controls to ensure the maintenance of accurate financial records. Specifically, credit card charges were recorded in the general ledger based on the day the charges cleared rather than the date the costs were incurred. This practice resulted in delays in recording expenditures, causing them to be recorded in the incorrect period. Recommendation: We recommend that Homeward Bound Adirondack, Inc. establish oversight practices to ensure that all revenues and expenses are recorded appropriately and reconciled to the proper drawdown requests. Response: Homeward Bound Adirondack, Inc. agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to address the recommendation in 2025.

Finding 2024-005 – Period of Performance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds AL Number: 21.027 Pass-through: Community Shelter Board Award Number: YMCA-24-CSB and YMCA-25-CSB Award Year: 7/1/2023 – 6/30/2024 and 7/1/2024 – 6/30/2025 Type of Finding: Material Weakness and Noncompliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.403(h): Administrative closeout costs may be incurred until the due date of the final report(s). If incurred, these costs must be liquidated prior to the due date of the final report(s) and charged to the final budget period of the award unless otherwise specified by the Federal agency. All other costs must be incurred during the approved budget period. 2 CFR 200.302: The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following: Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition: The Association was unable to verify whether costs recorded in the financial accounting system were included in invoices submitted for cost reimbursement. As such, auditors could not verify whether these costs were included in the appropriate period of performance. Context: Out of a sample of 40 transactions tested for compliance with period of performance requirements, 27 of them could not be traced to a reimbursement invoice. Most of these transactions were transfers of payroll costs from one program to another. Cause: The Association did not have a strong process to track program expenses with the financial accounting system and did not effectively reconcile expenditures between the general ledger and the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. In addition, the Association did not maintain support for expenditures charged to federal grants to be able to support whether they were within the allowable period of performance. Effect: The Association could not provide evidence of whether the transactions tested were within the period of performance. Questioned costs: $602,142 Identification of how questioned costs were computed: Known questioned costs were computed by summing the dollar amount of selections that were identified as errors which totaled $6,829. An error rate was calculated by taking the number of errors divided by the total sample size as described in the Context section. This error rate was then applied to the untested population to calculate projected questioned costs of $595,313. Repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Association should review its policies and procedures to ensure costs recorded in the financial accounting system are able to be reconciled to invoices submitted for cost reimbursement as well as the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Views of responsible officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

2 CFR § 300 codified in 45 CFR part 75 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Health and Human Services. 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6) states the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.305 Payment. Additionally, for Federal awards, the Uniform Guidance requires a written policy for the procurement requirements outlined in 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1), 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(2), and 2 CFR § 200.320(B) 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.430 states that costs of compensation are allowable to the extent that they satisfy the specific requirements of this part, and that the total compensation for individual employees: (1) Is reasonable for the services rendered and conforms to the established written policy of the non-Federal entity consistently applied to both Federal and non-Federal activities; (2) Follows an appointment made in accordance with a non-Federal entity's laws and/or rules or written policies and meets the requirements of Federal statute, where applicable; and (3) Is determined and supported as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses, when applicable. 2 CFR 200.431 requires established written leave policies if the entity intends to pay fringe benefits. 2 CFR 200.464(a)(2) requires reimbursement of relocation costs to employees be in accordance with an established written policy must be consistently followed by the employer. 2 CFR 200.475 requires reimbursement and/or charges to be consistent with those normally allowed in like circumstances in the non-Federal entity's non-federally-funded activities and in accordance with non-Federal entity's written travel reimbursement policies. The General Health District did not have written policies as required by Uniform Guidance. The failure to implement written policies as required by Uniform Guidance could result in noncompliance with the District’s federal programs. The General Health District should adopt written policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance with Reporting (Preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA)) ALN: 10.904, Milk River Project ALN: 10.923, Stream Restoration and Bridge Replacement for St. Mary Siphon Failure ALN: 15.U01, Replacement of St. Mary and Hallls Coulee Siphons on St. Mary Canal CRITERIA: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section §200.510(b) states in part: "The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with CFR Section §200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended." The schedule must provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program. CFR 200.302(b)(1) requires that the nonfederal entity must identify in its accounts and on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards all federal awards received and expended, as well as the federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listing program title and number, the federal award identification number and year, the name of the federal agency, and the name of the pass-through entity, if any. CONDITION: The ALN 10.923, Stream Restoration and Bridge Replacement for St. Mary Siphon Failure, was left off the prepared SEFA. Amounts reported for ALN 10.904 and ALN 15.U01 did not agree to the accounting records. CONTEXT: The SEFA was misstated as follows: • Understated for ALN 10.904 by $196,980; • Understated for ALN 10.923 by $105,977; and • Overstated for ALN 15.U01 by $1,978,224. The net effect was an overstatement of $1,675,267 for total federal expenditures. EFFECT: The SEFA provided was not complete and accurate. QUESTIONED COSTS: None CAUSE: The internal controls for the preparation of the SEFA and review of the SEFA were not present to ensure the SEFA was complete and accurate. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the MRJBOC prepare written procedures on how to put together the SEFA and strengthen internal controls to ensure all federal awards are included on the SEFA. We also recommend that the SEFA be reviewed by someone other than the preparer for completeness and accuracy prior to providing to the auditor. MRJBOC RESPONSE: MRJBOC acknowledges the deficiencies identified in the preparation and review of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). During 2024, the organization experienced a significant increase in federal funding activity related to emergency response and infrastructure replacement projects. The rapid expansion of federal programs, addition of funds and reporting requirements exceeded existing internal documentation and review processes. To strengthen compliance controls and ensure SEFA accuracy in future reporting periods, MRJBOC will implement the following corrective actions: • Develop and formalize written SEFA preparation procedures, including grant identification, ALN verification, and reconciliation to general ledger balances. • Establish a dual-review process in which the SEFA is reviewed and approved by a party independent from the preparer prior to submission to auditors. • Maintain a centralized federal grant tracking log that includes award numbers, funding sources, drawdowns, and cumulative expenditures. These measures will improve internal control over federal reporting, enhance accuracy, and ensure compliance with federal audit requirements.

Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post Federal Awards Requirements, Standards for Financial and Program Management, and §200.302 (b), Financial Management. The recipients financial management system must provide for identification, in its accounts, of all federal awards received and expended and the federal program under which they were received. Federal program and federal award identification must include, as applicable, the federal assistance listing title and number, federal award identification number, name of the federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Additional Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart F – Audit Requirements, §200.510, Financial Statements. Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards – The auditee also must prepare a schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the period covered by the auditee’s financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with §200.502, Basis for Determining Federal Awards Expended. At a minimum, the schedule must provide total federal awards expended for each individual federal program and the federal assistance listing number or other identifying number when the federal assistance listing information is not available. For a cluster of programs, also provide the total for the cluster. Condition: PCRI did not maintain a complete schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Cause: PCRI did not adequately track which government grants were federally-funded, resulting in an incomplete schedule of expenditures of federal awards. Effect: Failure to prepare an accurate and complete schedule of expenditures of federal awards results in noncompliance with 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post Federal Awards Requirements, Standards for Financial and Program Management, §200.302, Financial Management, and Subpart F – Audit Requirements, §200.510, Financial Statements. Recommendation: We recommend that PCRI document and implement policies and procedures to ensure the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is accurate and complete in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart D – Post Federal Awards Requirements, Standards for Financial and Program Management, §200.302, Financial Management, and Subpart F – Audit Requirements, §200.510, Financial Statements, in order to obtain accurate calculations of major federal programs for the Single Audit and to ensure that PCRI is in compliance with all of the reporting requirements as to identify the source and application of funds for federally-funded activities.

Lack of Written Procedures for Determining Allowability of Costs Condition: The Agency did not maintain written procedures for determining the allowability of costs charged to federal awards. Although management performs reviews of expenses to ensure reasonableness, these reviews are not guided by documented policies or standardized criteria. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), non-federal entities must maintain written procedures for determining allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E - Cost Principles of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ("Uniform Guidance"). Cause: Management was unaware that Uniform Guidance requires written procedures specifically addressing cost allowability, separate from general internal control or purchasing policies. Effect: Without documented procedures, there is an increased risk that unallowable or unsupported costs may be charged to federal programs, potentially resulting in noncompliance with federal cost principles and repayment obligations. Questioned Cost: None noted as a result of audit procedures performed. Recommendation: Management should develop and implement written procedures for determining allowability of costs consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7). Procedures should clearly define responsibilities, documentation requirements, and approval processes to ensure all cost charged to federal programs are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. Management Response: We agree with the findings in the audit report and have developed a Corrective Action Plan to address each item promptly. This has been a challenging year for the organization, including turnover in the Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") position and the fact that this was our first Single Audit due to increased federal funding related to COVID-19 programs. These factors contributed to delays in audit readiness, gaps in technical accounting for grants, and weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting and federal award reporting. We have implemented a comprehensive plan to address these challenges and will be hiring a new CFO in the first quarter of 2026.

Finding Reference Number: 2024-002 Reportable finding considered a significant deficiency - Inadequate support for distribution of donated food Title and CFDA Number of Federal Program: Emergency Food Assistance Program: 10.568 & 10.569 Federal award numbers & periods: 22-MOU-00108 23/24. 10/1/2023 - 9/30/2024 22-MOU-00108 24/25. 10/1/2024 - 9/30/2025 Type of Finding: Financial Statement and Federal Award Finding Finding Resolution Status: In Process Identification of Repeat Finding and Finding Reference Number: This is not a repeat finding Criteria: Organizations are required to maintain adequate documentation and an audit trail for all food distributions, including goods sent to distribution sites and goods used for on-site meal preparation, in accordance with sound internal control practices and applicable grant requirements (e.g., Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.302 – Financial Management and §200.303 – Internal Controls). Statement of Condition: During the audit, Food Bank Distribution Reports were provided showing goods sent to three locations, including recipient sign-offs, stating they received the food. Each location tracks food received and distributed to individuals. Leftover food is sent to various nonprofits to assist with distribution, if any. However, documentation for goods that were received and not distributed, at these three locations, could not be produced for review as an audit trail for who received and distributed leftover food. Additionally, Congregate Aggregate Feeding Reports, which track goods used for on-site meal preparation, and subsequent distribution, were also not available for review as they were not kept on file. The Organization lacked distribution documentation to support their monthly Distribution Report for goods distributed resulting in an incomplete audit trail. Cause: The Organization did not have formalized procedures or controls to ensure that all food distributions and on-site meal preparation activities were consistently documented and retained. Tracking was handled internally without standardized reporting requirements, resulting in incomplete records. Effect or Potential Effect: The absence of complete supporting documentation limits the Organization’s ability to demonstrate compliance with internal policies and donor requirements. It increases the risk of misstatement, misappropriation of goods, and potential noncompliance with grant or regulatory requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs associated with this finding. Context: During our testing of food distribution documentation, we selected Food Bank Distribution Reports from three distribution locations for the audit period. For each location, we reviewed documentation supporting goods received, goods distributed, and any goods remaining at the end of the distribution cycle. While signed recipient logs were available to support goods initially received at the locations, supporting documentation for goods that were received but not distributed—including records identifying where leftover food was subsequently sent—was not available for any of the three locations reviewed. Additionally, for onsite meal preparation activities, we requested Congregate Aggregate Feeding Reports used to track the quantities of goods prepared and served; however, the Organization did not retain these reports for the period under audit. As a result, none of the sampled items related to meal preparation activities had supporting documentation available for review. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement and enforce policies to ensure that all food distributions, including on-site meal preparation and any goods not distributed separately, are properly tracked and supported by documentation. This should include maintaining Congregate Aggregate Feeding Reports, retaining all distribution records and reconciling them to the Monthly Distribution Report, establishing procedures to ensure discarded goods are documented appropriately. These steps will strengthen internal controls and provide a clear audit trail for all commodities. Auditors’ Summary of the Auditee’s Comments on the Findings and Recommendations: See Corrective Action Plan

2 CFR 1000.10 provides that, except for the deviations set forth elsewhere in this Part, the Department of Treasury adopts the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards set forth at 2 CFR Part 200. 2 CFR 200.302 states, in part, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. 2 CFR 200.329(c)(1) states that non-Federal entities must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Reports submitted quarterly must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. 31 CFR 35.4(c) requires recipients, in part, during the period of performance, to provide the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury periodic reports providing detailed accounting of the uses of funds, modifications to a State or Territory's tax revenue sources, and such other information as the Secretary may require for the administration of this section. The U.S. Department of Treasury provided supplementary information in its 2021 interim final rule on reporting requirements for State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds for 31 CFR Part 35 and provided further guidance in its Project and Expenditure Report User Guide for State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. The 2021 interim rule supplementary information, part VIII states that counties will be required to submit quarterly Project and Expenditure reports through the end of the award period on December 31, 2026. The Department of Treasury’s Project and Expenditure Report User Guide provides, in part, that counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents must submit a Project and Expenditure Report by January 31, 2022 and then the last day of the month after the end of each quarter thereafter. The County did not have proper internal controls in place to ensure the timely and accurate submission of the Project and Expenditure Reports. During testing of Project and Expenditure Reports for the COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (AL #21.027), we noted that: • The County did not submit the Project and Expenditure Reports for the second and fourth quarters by the required deadlines of July 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025, respectively. • On the first quarter Project and Expenditure Report, the County understated current period expenditures by $1,041,688, understated cumulative expenditures by $11,564,350, and understated cumulative obligations by $1,407,879. Similarly, on the third quarter Project and Expenditure Report, the County understated current period expenditures by $385.732, understated the cumulative expenditures by $13,169,950, and understated cumulative obligations by $1,407,879. Failure to have the proper controls in place to ensure the timely and accurate submission of the Project and Expenditure Reports could result in Treasury taking action against the County for failure to comply with programmatic requirements. The County should implement and have controls in place to ensure the quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports are accurate and filed by the required due dates.

ALN 14.251 and ALN 21.027 Finding #2024‐004 Incorrect Recording of Expenditures that were Notes Receivable Draws Repeat Finding: No Condition: The Organization recorded $2,425,133 of federal program expenditures as expenses in the year ended December 31, 2024. These amounts represented disbursements made to a subrecipient under terms that required repayment, and therefore should have been recorded as a note receivable. The Organization did not recognize the note receivable nor properly classify the related transactions, resulting in a misstatement of expenditures and assets. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 and generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the Organization is required to maintain accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results of each federal award. Accounting records must adequately identify the source and application of federal funds and properly classify transactions, assets, liabilities, and equity in accordance with GAAP. Cause: The misclassification occurred because the Organization did not have sufficient internal controls to ensure that disbursements under this program were evaluated for the proper accounting treatment (i.e., expense versus note receivable/loan). Effect: Federal program expenditures were overstated by $2,245,133 and assets were understated by the same amount. The lack of proper classification may affect stakeholders’ understanding of the Organization’s financial position and federal compliance. Questioned Costs: None noted, as the expenditures were incurred under the program; however, the classification error represents a material reporting misstatement. Perspective Information: The condition noted represents $2,425,133 of expenditures, which were inaccurately reported. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its review process over accounting for federal program disbursements. Policies and procedures should require evaluation of whether disbursements meet the definition of an expense or a loan/note receivable in accordance with GAAP and federal reporting requirements. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. The Organization’s accountant was unaware that the federal grant payments to the subrecipient were considered draws on a note receivable. Corrections have been made to improve communication with the accountant to ensure the accountant is aware of key grant provisions and to ensure note receivable draws are being properly accounted for in the general ledger.

ALN 21.027 Finding #2024‐005 Insufficient Accounting to Track Federal Grant Expenditures Repeat Finding: No Condition: The Organization did not maintain accounting records that sufficiently tracked expenditures relating to the federal program. Instead, federal program expenditures were co‐mingled with all other organizational expenditures. As a result, the Organization was unable to readily identify the federal share of costs or demonstrate that the costs charged were allowable under the terms of the award. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302, non‐federal entities must maintain financial management systems that provide for: · Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results of each federal award; · Records that identify adequately the source and application of federal funds; and · Effective control and accountability for all funds, property, and other assets. These requirements include maintaining accounting records that segregate federal program expenditures from non‐federal activity to ensure compliance with applicable statutes, regulations, and terms of the award. Cause: The Organization did not implement accounting controls and procedures to establish separate accounts or cost centers for federal program expenditures. Effect: Because federal program expenditures were not separately tracked, there is an increased risk of: · Unallowable or unsupported costs being charged to the program, · Inaccurate reporting on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA), and · Noncompliance with Uniform Guidance financial management standards. Questioned Costs: None noted. Perspective Information: The condition affected one of the Coronavirus State and Fiscal Recovery – ARPA grants, ALN 21.027, which accounted for $153,653 of federal expenditures for 2024. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization implement an accounting system that separately tracks federal program expenditures, either through distinct general ledger accounts, cost centers, or project codes. The system should allow management to readily identify federal expenditures, prepare accurate SEFA reporting, and demonstrate compliance with federal requirements. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. The Organization is in process of implementing a project‐based ledger and procedures to ensure federal expenditures are properly coded so they are readily identifiable.

ALN 14.251 and ALN 21.027 Finding #2024‐006 Financial Policies and Procedures Repeat Finding: No Condition: The Organization did not have formalized, written financial policies and procedures that address key Uniform Guidance requirements. Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.302(b), non‐federal entities must establish and maintain effective financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award. Uniform Guidance further requires that entities implement written policies and procedures governing: · Allowable costs (2 CFR 200.302(b)(7) and 200.403–200.405), · Procurement (2 CFR 200.317–200.327), · Cash management (2 CFR 200.305), · Travel costs (2 CFR 200.475), and · Conflict of interest (2 CFR 200.318(c)(1)). Written policies serve as the framework for consistent compliance with federal requirements. Cause: The Organization had not developed or adopted written financial policies, relying instead on informal practices and staff knowledge to manage federal awards. Effect: The absence of formalized financial policies increases the risk of noncompliance with Uniform Guidance, inconsistent application of requirements, and potential misuse of federal funds. The lack of a documented framework also limits accountability and makes it difficult to train new staff or demonstrate compliance to oversight agencies. Questioned Costs: None noted. Perspective Information: This condition applied to the Organization’s overall financial management system and impacted all federal programs administered during the year ended December 31, 2024. As such, the lack of formalized financial policies represents a systemic issue and a material weakness in internal control over compliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization adopt formal, written financial policies and procedures that address all Uniform Guidance requirements applicable to federal awards. These policies should be approved by management and the governing body, disseminated to staff, and reviewed periodically to ensure continued compliance. Reporting Views of Responsible Officials: The Organization agrees with the finding. The Organization will establish formalized accounting policies and procedures that adhere to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.

Finding 2024-005 - Reporting Federal Award Information: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 93.568 Federal Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance Reporting Compliance Requirement No Questioned Costs Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.303, the Organization is required to establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance of compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.302(a) requires that the financial management system provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award. Further, 2 CFR 200.334 requires financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to a Federal award be retained to support amounts reported. The OMB Compliance Supplement identifies Reporting as a compliance requirement for this program and requires that financial reports be supported by underlying accounting records and subject to appropriate review prior to submission. Condition: During our audit, we noted that financial reports submitted to the Federal awarding agency were not consistently supported by retained documentation demonstrating how reported amounts were calculated. In addition, there was no documented evidence of supervisory review or approval of the reports prior to submission. During interim testing of reports, we noted that certain periodic financial reports submitted to the pass-through entity did not reconcile to the Organization’s general ledger at the time of submission. The variances were attributable to journal entries, voided checks, and other posting adjustments recorded after report submission. While cumulative and final reports ultimately agreed to the Organization’s accounting records and no amended reports were required, documentation reconciling the differences at the time of submission was not retained. documentation was retained for amounts reported to the Federal awarding agency or to require documented supervisory review of reports prior to submission. Effect or Potential Effect: The absence of supporting documentation and independent review increases the risk that inaccurate, incomplete, or unsupported information could be reported to the Federal awarding agency and not be detected in a timely manner. Although no questioned costs were identified as a result of our audit procedures, this deficiency creates a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with reporting requirements could occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Questioned Costs: None. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to:  Retain supporting documentation for all amounts reported to Federal awarding agencies, including reconciliations to the general ledger;  Require documented supervisory review and approval of reports prior to submission; and  Ensure that adjustments occurring after report submission are documented and, when necessary, corrected through revised reporting. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management acknowledged that supporting documentation was not consistently retained and that supervisory review was not formally documented. Management has indicated that procedures will be implemented to ensure reports are reconciled to accounting records, properly supported, and reviewed prior to submission.

Finding 2024-001 - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Mortgage Insurance Rental and Cooperative Housing for Moderate Income Families and Elderly, Market Interest Rate, CFDA #14.135 Statement of Condition: Internal control processes over financial accounting did not ensure that all transactions were properly recorded. Internal control processes over financial accounting did not ensure that key accounts were reconciled or reviewed on a periodic basis. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4370.2 REV-1, Chapter 2 requires the books and accounts to be complete and accurate. HUD Handbook 4370.2 REV-1, Chapter 2, Section 12 requires monthly reconciliations of all cash accounts. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200 Section 200.302 Financial Management states that the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award in accordance with the reporting requirements. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200 Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions. Effect: Noncompliance with HUD and Uniform Guidance requirements and the possibility of undetected material misstatements and/or undetected misappropriation of assets. Cause: Prior management oversight. Context: An understanding of processes and internal controls was performed with the Corporation's management and tests were performed to determine if the processes and internal controls were implemented and effective. As part of this process we noted the following processes and internal controls were not effective and/or implemented. 1) Only two of the six bank accounts were reconciled. The outsourced bookkeeper only performed a bank reconciliation for the operating and security deposit cash accounts. 2) The accounts receivable, tenants and accounts receivable, HUD were not reconciled. 3) The monthly review process of the Corporation's financial information is not fully supported by evidence of such review. Questioned Costs: N/A Recommendation: We recommend management review/enhance its accounting and internal control procedures to ensure that all key accounts are reconciled and reviewed with supporting evidence of such review. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding and will review the accounting and financial procedures, system of internal controls and policies. The Corporation has executed a new management agreement with Remnant Management Inc. effective October 1, 2024. Remnant Management Inc. will ensure that all transactions are properly recorded and that key accounts are reconciled and reviewed on a periodic basis beginning October 1, 2024 and going forward.

Subject: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Assistance Listing Number: 14.871 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): CY 2024 Pass-Through Entity: Not applicable Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Condition and Context: During the review of disbursements, it was noted the Housing Authority does not consistently document approval of disbursements prior to payment. Our sample of cash disbursements revealed that checks and electronic payments were processed without evidence of review or authorization by management. Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.302(b)(3), non-Federal entities must maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that charges to Federal programs are allowable, allocable, and in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements. Additionally, sound internal control practices require that disbursements be reviewed and approved to ensure they are valid, properly supported, and in compliance with program requirements. Cause: The Authority has not implemented procedures requiring documented review and approval of disbursements before payment is made. Effect: Without documented approval of disbursements, there is an increased risk of unauthorized, unsupported, or unallowable expenditures. Questioned Cost: Known and projected misstatement: None Recommendation: The Housing Authority should implement policies and procedures that require all disbursements to be approved by the Board prior to checks being issued.

FINDING 2024‐001 – Allowable Cost Principles and Activities Allowed or Unallowed Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Assistance Listing Number: 21.029 Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund Award Year: 2024 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires non-Federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over Federal awards, including ensuring transactions are properly recorded, reported, and allowable. Specifically: • 2 CFR §200.302(b)(1) and (b)(2) require financial management systems to provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results and to identify expenditures by Federal award. • 2 CFR §200.302(b)(6) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs. • 2 CFR §200.303 requires entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over compliance, including appropriate segregation of duties. Condition and context: The Cooperative does not have formalized written policies and procedures governing the coding, review, and reporting of expenditures charged to Federal awards, including payroll costs. Additionally, adequate segregation of duties is not in place over the review and approval of expenditure coding and financial reporting. As a result, payroll expenditures were not consistently or timely coded to the appropriate grant. Payroll expenditures totaling $16,990 were identified subsequent to year-end and recorded and reported late. These costs were not included in the appropriate reporting period, resulting in delayed recognition of allowable expenditures. Questioned costs: None. Effect: The absence of formal policies, procedures, and proper segregation of duties increases the risk that expenditures are not accurately, completely, or timely recorded and reported by Federal award. This may result in: • Financial reports that do not reflect complete and accurate program expenditures for the reporting period; • Increased risk of noncompliance with Federal reporting requirements; • Potential misstatement or omission of allowable costs; and • Delays in reimbursement or increased risk of questioned costs. Additionally, the late identification and backdating of payroll expenditures contributed to the triggering of Single Audit requirements, which are now being performed after the required timeframe. Cause: The deficiencies are due to a lack of formalized written policies and procedures over expenditure coding, allowability determinations, and reporting, as well as inadequate segregation of duties in the preparation, review, and approval of grant-related expenditures and reports. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the Cooperative develop and implement written policies and procedures to ensure timely, consistent, and correct coding of all grant-related expenditures (payroll and non-payroll). Within these policies and procedures, we recommend establishing review and approval controls, including periodic review of expenditure coding by supervisory or accounting personnel. Implementing these policies and procedures will ensure expenditures are recorded within the appropriate reporting period. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Wabash currently maintains informal procedures for coding and reviewing invoices and payroll records, management recognizes the need for a formalized, written policy governing expenditures charged to federal awards. To address identified material weaknesses, Wabash is committed to implementing a comprehensive written policy by June 30, 2026. This policy will formalize the coding, review, and reporting processes for all federal expenditures. Contact Person(s): Cheryl Gaither, Controller Justin Gephart, Chief Operating Officer

Finding No. 2024-001 Implement System-Based Tracking of Federal Expenditures Assistance Listing Number: 93.566 Program Name: Refugee and Entrant Assistance State/Replacement Designee Administered Programs Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Passed Through Entities: 1. California Department of Social Services 2. University of California, San Diego 3. California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation 4. San Diego Refugee Communities Coalition/United Women of East Africa Support Team 5. Public Health Institute (PHI) Federal Award Numbers: ALSP22-0002-A1, ALSP23-0001, PUR00533092, ACS22-05-CAIR, 06568-AR76924 Federal Award Year: August 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Criteria: Management is responsible for designing, implementing, and maintaining an internal control system that ensures accurate financial reporting. Effective internal control over financial reporting provides reasonable assurance regarding the completeness and accuracy of accounting records, and compliance with grantor requirements. 2 CFR 200.510 Financial Statements require auditees to prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements. This schedule must include the total Federal awards expended, as determined in accordance with 2 CFR 200.502. The information presented should be consistent with the accounting records (i.e., general ledger). In addition, Section 2 CFR 200.302(b)(1) provides that non-Federal entities must maintain effective control over and accountability for all funds, and must identify, in their accounts, all Federal awards received and expended. Condition: During our review of the SEFA, we noted that CAIR-CA utilizes workbooks outside of its accounting software to track federal expenditures. The workbooks do not reconcile directly with the general ledger (GL), so management performs a separate reconciliation to support the SEFA amounts. This approach was similarly observed in the prior year's audit. Cause: The prior year audit was completed in August 2025, after the close of the fiscal year 2024. As a result, management was still in the process of implementing a system-based tracking during the year 2024. CAIR-CA’s processes for tracking federal awards are continuing to develop, as this is only the second year under Single Audit. Effect: Using manual workbooks requires additional manual effort and may make reconciliation between SEFA and GL more time-consuming, and may result in inaccurate or incomplete reporting. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: We recommend that CAIR-CA continue enhancing its accounting processes to track federal expenditures directly within its accounting software. This could include GL tracking codes or other similar identifiers for federal programs. System based tracking would simplify SEFA preparation, improve consistency with the general ledger, and strengthen monitoring of federal expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management concurs with the finding and has already updated the accounting system to incorporate grant-specific tracking codes to further align with federal reporting standards. Because the organization’s first single audit in FY2023 was conducted concurrently with the FY2024 single audit, there was limited opportunity for these procedural improvements to be reflected in the FY2024 single audit testing cycle. As a result, the impact of these changes will be more fully reflected in the FY2025 single audit, which is scheduled to commence this year. As part of a layered approach to internal controls, excel worksheets will continue to be used as a supplementary monitoring tool, providing an additional cross-check to the system-generated reports. Responsible person: Jackie Ramirez, Operations & Finance Associate Director Implementation date: November 20, 2025

Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.303(a), the non-Federal entity must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over Federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the awards. Additionally, per 2 CFR §200.403 and §200.302, costs charged to federal awards must be allowable, allocable, and properly documented, and financial reporting must be accurate, complete, and supported by the accounting system. Condition: Although the Parish has implemented internal controls related to the allowability of costs and the preparation of required reports for the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds, they were not operating effectively during fiscal year 2024. Tests of controls indicated that transactions were not tracked appropriately to ensure they were charged to the correct funding source. In addition, quarterly project and expenditure reports submitted to the U.S. Treasury included inaccurate or unsupported information due to a lack of tracking and reconciliation procedures. Cause: As discussed in item 2024-001, the Parish encountered several challenges during the transition of administration and key personnel. Parish administration and management were immediately tasked with enhancing operations related to procedural concerns from the prior administration and performing the accounting function without sufficient documentation on several balances and transactions. The documented controls were not in practice because of this. Effect: While no instances of noncompliance were noted, the lack of documented controls in practice increases the risk that future required reports could be incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely, as well as, federal costs being unallowed per the cost principles which could potentially result in program noncompliance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Parish enhance and document internal controls over financial reporting, as described in our recommendations described under item 2024-001, to prevent noncompliance of the Uniform Guidance as required. Views of responsible officials: See management’s responses to findings on Page 116.

Finding 2024-001, Expense Allocations - Financial Management (Assistance Listings 19.510, 93.566, 93.583 and 93.576) Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 200.302(a) (Financial Management), all recipient and subrecipient financial management systems must be sufficient to track expenditures and establish that funds have been used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition and Context: The Organization’s documentation related to the reconciliation of government grant revenue claimed and received to the actual revenue earned were not maintained. The lack of regular reconciliations increased the risk of misstatements in the financial records and delayed the financial reporting process. Cause: Internal controls over government grant revenue were not operating efficiently or designed properly. Effect: This resulted to significant amount of time required by both Management and the Auditors in order to analyze and adjust grant revenue, accounts receivables and deferred revenue balances accurately. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its policies and procedures for reconciling the grant revenue earned to the related expenses. Financial reports and claims should be created from the reconciled general ledger. Additionally, management should establish clear documentation procedures to support the proper allocation of expenses in the general ledger and ensure compliance with federal regulations. View of responsible officials: Management has reviewed the finding and recommendations. We note that this item was identified as a repeat issue primarily due to the timing of the prior year's audit. Because the FY23 findings were delivered after FY24 had already concluded, the Organization did not have the opportunity to incorporate the auditors' feedback during the FY24 audited period. However, the Organization took immediate, proactive steps to deploy enhanced internal controls for FY25 to ensure continuous alignment with federal standards. To ensure strict adherence to 2 CFR § 200.302(a), we are actively implementing a more regular reconciliation process between government grant revenue claimed and actual revenue earned. As a key part of this initiative, the Organization has developed and deployed new internal financial tools designed to incorporate automation into our daily workflows. By utilizing these automated tools-such as standardized templates for recording cash receipts and systematically clearing Accounts Receivable-we have significantly enhanced the accuracy of our data entries and reduced the risk of manual misstatements. Our ongoing objective is to leverage these tools to establish clear, standardized documentation procedures, ensuring that all financial reports and claims are consistently generated from a reconciled general ledger. Management remains fully committed to dedicating the necessary time and resources to mature these financial controls and ensure robust compliance with federal regulations.

2 CFR § 1000.10 gives regulatory effect to the Department of Treasury for the following sections of 2 CFR 200: 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(7) requires written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E-Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. 2 CFR 200.320(b)(2)(ii) requires non-federal entities to have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the competitive proposals received and for selecting contract recipients. 2 CFR 200.319(d) requires non-federal entities to have written procedures for procurement transactions to ensure all solicitations incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the property, equipment, or service to be procured and identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. The Village was awarded grant monies under the Uniform Guidance (UG); however, the Village did not establish formal written policies required by the UG for the sections listed above. A lack of policies could result in inadequate guidance for individuals to follow and ensure proper compliance. To help ensure compliance with the Uniform Guidance requirements, the Village should establish and maintain timely updated policies and, more importantly, implement procedures as specified by UG requirements for all grant monies received. Any changes to the Village's policies should also be formally approved by Council and documented within the minutes.

NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESSES 2 CFR 1000.10 provides that, except for the deviations set forth elsewhere in this Part, the Department of Treasury adopts the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards set forth at 2 CFR Part 200. 2 CFR 200.302(b)(2) states, in part, the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. 2 CFR 200.329(c)(1) states that non-Federal entities must submit performance reports at the interval required by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to best inform improvements in program outcomes and productivity. Per the City’s Ohio Department of Development Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Program Grant Agreement, program reports must be submitted by close of business, on the second Friday at the end of each quarter. Program reports must include the following information: a. Narrative summary of use of funds during the reporting period b. Narrative describing promoting equitable outcomes. Describe efforts used to promote equitable outcomes, including how projects were implemented with equity in mind. c. Narrative describing community engagement d. Labor Practices: Describe workforce practices on projects implemented. How is the project using strong labor standards to promote effective and efficient delivery of high quality infrastructure. e. Project Construction Start Date (if applicable) f. Project Operations date g. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number (if applicable) h. Public Water System (PWS) ID Number (if applicable) i. Information on Matching funds utilized during the reporting period (i.e., source, amount and uses) The City did not have proper internal controls in place to ensure the timely submission of the quarterly performance reports related to the Galalina & Harbor Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation. We noted that the City did not file the first of the third quarterly reports as required by their grant agreement.Failure to have the proper controls in place to ensure the timely submission of the quarterly performance reports could result in the Treasury taking action against the City for failure to comply with programmatic requirements. The City should implement and have controls in place to ensure the quarterly performance reports are filed by the required due dates.

Incorrect Grant Drawdown – Allowable Costs / Reporting – Assistance Listing Numbers: 93.224 and 93.527 Consolidated Health Center Cluster Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Condition: During grant drawdown testing, it was noted that on December 6, 2024, management drew down $79,942 from the CARE Grant that related to expenditures attributable to the PREP Grant. No documentation or evidence of communication with the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”) was identified to demonstrate that the error was reported or corrected in a timely manner. This indicates that controls were not operating effectively to ensure grant drawdowns were made from the appropriate federal award. Criteria: Title 2 CFR §200.302 and §200.305 require non-Federal entities to maintain effective internal control over federal awards and ensure that drawdowns are limited to allowable costs incurred under the applicable award. Additionally, HRSA grant terms and conditions require recipients to request funds only for expenditures attributable to the specific grant award. Effect: Drawing funds from an incorrect federal award increases the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements and may result in unallowable costs, inaccurate reporting, or the need for repayment if not timely identified and corrected. Context: The exception noted represents a grant drawdown of $79,941.72 from the CARE Grant that was attributable to expenditures under the PrEP Grant, with no evidence of timely correction or notification to HRSA identified during audit testing. Questioned Costs: $79,942 Cause: Controls designed to ensure grant expenditures were properly aligned with the correct federal award prior to drawdown were not operating effectively, and procedures for identifying, reporting, and correcting drawdown errors were not consistently applied. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen internal controls over grant drawdowns by implementing procedures to ensure expenditures are reviewed and reconciled to the appropriate federal award prior to requesting funds. Management should also establish formal procedures for timely identification, documentation, and communication of drawdown errors to the awarding agency when identified. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: Fiscal Year 2026

Finding Number: 2024-008 Cash Management Cost reimbursement reports not maintained – Material weakness in internal controls, material noncompliance Assistance Listing Number: 93.193 Program Title: Urban Indian Health Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Award Number: H722IHS0128-22-00 Pass-Through Entity: Indian Health Services Criteria: The Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302(a) requires non-Federal entities to maintain financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results. Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.334 requires retention of financial records, including reports submitted to the grantor, for a period of three years. Condition: As a result of auditor testing, it was found that NACA did not retain copies of cost reimbursement reports submitted to the grantor for the Urban Health Clinic/Substance Abuse Prevention and Title V contracts. As a result, auditors were unable to verify amounts reported or reconcile reported amounts to NACA’s accounting records. Also, NACA did not have internal controls in place to ensure that copies of cost reimbursement reports submitted to the grantor for the Urban Health Clinic/Substance Abuse Prevention and Title V contracts were maintained for internal records. Cause: NACA lacked procedures to ensure that financial reports submitted for reimbursement were retained in accordance with Federal record retention requirements. Effect: Failure to retain cost reimbursement reports increases the risk of noncompliance with Federal requirements and limits NACA’s ability to support amounts requested for reimbursement. This also impacts transparency and auditability of financial activity. Recommendation: We recommend that NACA implement a process to ensure all cost reimbursement reports are retained and properly organized. This should include establishing a centralized recordkeeping system and periodic review procedures to confirm completeness of financial reporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: NACA concurs with the recommendation.

Finding Number: 2024-009 Reporting Performance reports not maintained- Material weakness in internal controls, material noncompliance Assistance Listing Number: 93.193 Program Title: Urban Indian Health Services Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Indian Health Services Criteria: The Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302(a) requires non-Federal entities to maintain financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results for each Federal award. In addition, non-Federal entities must ensure required programmatic (performance) reports are supported by appropriate documentation. Condition: As a result of auditor testing, it was found that NACA did not maintain adequate supporting documentation for performance-related reports submitted to the grantor for the Title V program. Cause: During the year ended December 31, 2024, NACA had limited administrative resources and lacked formal procedures to ensure that performance reporting documentation was retained and properly organized. Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, NACA is at increased risk of noncompliance with Federal reporting requirements, and there is reduced transparency and accountability over reported program performance. Recommendation: We recommend that NACA strengthen internal controls over performance reporting by implementing procedures to retain supporting documentation for all submitted reports and establishing a review process to ensure completeness and accuracy. Views of responsible officials: NACA concurs with the recommendation.

2024-005 Internal Controls over Grant Management (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) (repeat finding 2023-005) Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 establishes the requirements of a financial management system adequate to ensure compliance with federal regulations. This system must include written procedures to implement requirements for payment methods and determine the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E. Statement of Condition: The City has written fiscal policies but they do not meet the financial management system requirements established in the regulations. Cause: The City has processes and procedures in place to administer grant funds but written policies do not contain compliance requirements. Effect: The City is not in compliance with financial management system requirements. Recommendation: The City should develop a grants manual or additional written policies to incorporate all the requirements of 2 CFR 200 and ensure compliance. Views of Management and Planned Corrective Action: See Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.

Finding 2024-005 Allowable Costs–Payroll Costs (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) (Repeat Finding) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.302 establishes the requirements for sufficient financial management over grant funding to ensure records adequately identify the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Condition: We tested 32 payroll disbursements across five pay periods. Of those 32, 5 exceptions were noted. One exception was that the amount of time and corresponding amounts allocated to the grant did not agree to the percentage documented on the employee’s timesheet. For the other 4 exceptions, the supporting time sheets could not be provided for a pay period tested. Cause: Employee timesheets are turned in after payroll is processed and allocations made, the timesheet in this exception did not agree to the amount allocated. Four supporting time sheets for a January payroll processed could not be located. Effect: The Council did not retain proper documentation to support payroll costs charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $729 Recommendation: We recommend the Council strengthen procedures surrounding payroll so that the source documentation agrees to and is retained to support the amounts being allocated to the grant based on actual employee time. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.

Finding 2024-005 Allowable Costs–Payroll Costs (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) (Repeat Finding) Information on the Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Assistance Listing #93.243 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Projects of Regional and National Significance. Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.302 establishes the requirements for sufficient financial management over grant funding to ensure records adequately identify the source and application of funds for federally funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. Condition: We tested 32 payroll disbursements across five pay periods. Of those 32, 5 exceptions were noted. One exception was that the amount of time and corresponding amounts allocated to the grant did not agree to the percentage documented on the employee’s timesheet. For the other 4 exceptions, the supporting time sheets could not be provided for a pay period tested. Cause: Employee timesheets are turned in after payroll is processed and allocations made, the timesheet in this exception did not agree to the amount allocated. Four supporting time sheets for a January payroll processed could not be located. Effect: The Council did not retain proper documentation to support payroll costs charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: $729 Recommendation: We recommend the Council strengthen procedures surrounding payroll so that the source documentation agrees to and is retained to support the amounts being allocated to the grant based on actual employee time. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.