Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-002: Preparation of the Schedule of Federal Expenditures (SEFA) Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (Financial Management) the auditee must be able to identify all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the assistance listing number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any. Condition: During our review of the initial SEFA several errors came to our attention. There were multiple instances where the expenditures reported on the SEFA did not agree to the underlying supporting financial reports, and adjustments to the SEFA were required. Cause: During fiscal year 2022, the SEFA was not maintained with sufficient accuracy and detail. At year-end, there was insufficient review of the SEFA by the appropriate personnel who possess the necessary expertise. Effect or Potential Effect: Inaccurate and incomplete information on the SEFA could lead to unreliable and erroneous grant reporting, internal record keeping and decision making. Questioned Costs: Undetermined Context: Our audit testwork consisted of substantive procedures over the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. We determined that the issue was systemic in nature. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes - Findings 2020-002 and 2021-002. Recommendation: We recommend ABC review the SEFA and supporting schedules prior to the audit to ensure the SEFA is complete and all numbers are accurate and can be supported. Additionally, to reduce the risk of human error, we recommend all grant activity be tracked within the accounting system.
Finding 2022-005 Internal Controls Over Compliance for Cash Management, Allowable Costs, and Procurement Federal Program: 10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities Condition: The City does not have formally documented written controls to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget?s (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), in regards to determining allowable costs, procurement procedures, and cash management. Criteria: 2 CFR ? 200.302(b) requires the City to have written procedures related to managing cash from federal awards, including determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E ? Cost Principles. Additionally, 2 CFR ? 318(a) and (c), requires the City to formally document procedures used for procurements made within federal programs, to demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance, which includes written standards of conduct that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of individuals engaged in procurement. Cause: The City?s policies and procedures have not been formally drafted and updated in written form. Effect: Failure to have written policies and procedures resulted in the City?s noncompliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Context: This is a general requirement that pertains to most federal grants. This was not identified via sampling procedures. Questioned Costs: None identified. Recommendation: We recommend that management adopt the referenced policies in order to comply with Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials And Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the recommendation. See corresponding Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-002: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects (Section 223(f)/207) Statement of Condition: Internal control processes over financial reporting did not ensure that all transactions were properly recorded. Criteria: The HUD Handbook 4370.2, Chapter 2 requires the books and accounts to be complete and accurate. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200 Section 200.302 Financial Management states that the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award in accordance with the reporting requirements. Additionally, 2 CFR Part 200 Section 200.303(a), Internal Controls, requires that non-federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions. Effect: Noncompliance with HUD and Uniform Guidance regulations. Cause: Management oversight. Context: A review of journal entries made during the year revealed journal entries made in the incorrect period and erroneous journal entries. Additionally, the review process of the Corporation's financial information did not discover these errors. Recommendation: We recommend management review/enhance its accounting and internal control procedures to ensure that all key accounts are reconciled and reviewed with supporting evidence of such review. Questioned Costs: N/A Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding and will review the accounting and financial procedures, system of internal controls and policies.
Unallowable Costs Significant Deficiency U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION (SBA) ALN #: 59.077 Federal Award Identification #: COVID-19 Community Navigator Pilot Program (SBAHQ22CNP0036) Condition: The Organization charged and was reimbursed for grant expenses that were not paid. There also is not a clear trail from source document to expenditures charged to the federal grant. Criteria: CFR 200.302, 200.403 Questioned Costs: $17,984 Context: Out of $253,139 of non-payroll expenses charged to the grant and reimbursed, $17,984 was not yet paid to program beneficiaries. Cause: Financial management system is not adequate to track grant funds and expenses from source document to grant reimbursement. Effect: Potential for over charging the grant for expenses not allocable to the program or charging the same expense to multiple funding sources. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable: Not Applicable Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization track grant funds through a general ledger project designation to provide an audit trail from source document to grant revenue and allowable grant expenditures. We also recommend that the program beneficiaries be paid or the funds reimbursed be returned to the SBA. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan.