Condition: For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, we requested that Day One prepare and send us a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. Requested that the expenditures reported in the SEFA be reconciled to Day One’s accounting records. We reviewed the SEFA and compared them to the accounting records; we noted that the expenditures reported were inaccurate. Criteria: Recipients of federal awards are subject to requirements documented in section of the Uniform Guidance Sections 200.510, 200.502, and 200.302. The criteria for each are as follows: § 200.510 Financial statements (b) Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards. The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502.” § 200.502 Basis for determining Federal awards expended (a) Determining Federal awards expended. The determination of when a federal award is expended must be based on when the activity related to the Federal award occurs. Generally, the activity pertains to events that require the non-Federal entity to comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards, such as: expenditure/expense transactions associated with awards including grants, cost-reimbursement contracts under the FAR, compacts with Indian Tribes, cooperative agreements, and direct appropriations; the disbursement of funds to subrecipients; the use of loan proceeds under loan and loan guarantee programs; the receipt of property; the receipt of surplus property; the receipt or use of program income; the distribution or use of food commodities; the disbursement of amounts entitling the non-Federal entity to an interest subsidy; and the period when insurance is in force.§ 200.302 Financial management (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements…..” Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Organization has not implemented policies and procedures requiring that the Schedule of Federal Awards to complete and accurate. Effect and Context: The Organization reported expenditures that exceeded $750,000 for 2022. In determining the major program to be audited for 2022, the auditor could not rely on the SEFA provided because the SEFA was not complete and expenditures reported were inaccurate. Which could have lead to an inaccurate reporting of federal expenditures for the Organization for 2022. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies and procedures requiring all federal expenditures be accurately reported in the year end Schedule of Federal Awards. Management’s Response and Corrective Action Plan: See management’s responses documented on page 46-47.
Finding 2023-003 - Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Qualified Opinion) - Inadequate Tracking of Expenditures and Retention of Documentation: Activities Allowed or Unallowed: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Reporting (A/B/L) for Assistance Listing Number 19.510 and 93.567 Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.510(b) states in part, “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of federal expenditures for the period covered by the auditee’s consolidated financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 200.502.” Also, in accordance with CFR Section 200.302(b) - Financial Management, the auditees financial management system must provide 1) identification of all federal awards received and expended; 2) accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program; 3) records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally‐funded activities; 4) effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets; 5) comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award; 6) written procedures to implement the requirements of section 200.305 and; 7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Recipients of federal awards must submit accurate, complete and timely financial and performance reports. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. The Organization should retain sufficient documentation such as invoice and allocation support for expenditures to retain documentation for audit purposes. Condition: During detail testing of expenditures, it was noted that the Organization did not maintain adequate documentation to support how certain costs were allocated to the federal program. Several transactions lacked sufficient detail, such as invoice or expense reimbursement form. Several expenditures selected for testing did not obtain sufficient approval by an individual at the Organization. It was noted that quarterly reports provided to the federal program were not reviewed by an individual at the Organization prior to submission to ensure accurate report of expenditures. Cause: The Organization does not have an adequate system in place to ensure quarterly reports have sufficient supporting documentation, proper approval/review, and accurate reporting prior to submission. Responsibilities for expenditure tracking were not clearly assigned, and there was no formal review process in place. The Organization is not following their Document Retention Policy. Effect: The effect of this condition increases the possibility that quarterly financial reports are misstated or inaccurate and increase the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements. The effect of this condition also increases the risk that expenditures are unallowable per the grant, federal regulations, or cost principles due to the insufficient support of proper approval retained. Questioned costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-004 Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be in place to ensure quarterly financial reports are properly supported, accurately reported, and adequately approved and reviewed. A formal review process should be established to ensure compliance. The Organization should following the Document Retention Policy that was put in place and required by law. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and their response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2023-003 - Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance (Qualified Opinion) - Inadequate Tracking of Expenditures and Retention of Documentation: Activities Allowed or Unallowed: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Reporting (A/B/L) for Assistance Listing Number 19.510 and 93.567 Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.510(b) states in part, “The auditee must also prepare a schedule of federal expenditures for the period covered by the auditee’s consolidated financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with 200.502.” Also, in accordance with CFR Section 200.302(b) - Financial Management, the auditees financial management system must provide 1) identification of all federal awards received and expended; 2) accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program; 3) records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federally‐funded activities; 4) effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets; 5) comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award; 6) written procedures to implement the requirements of section 200.305 and; 7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Recipients of federal awards must submit accurate, complete and timely financial and performance reports. The Organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. The Organization should retain sufficient documentation such as invoice and allocation support for expenditures to retain documentation for audit purposes. Condition: During detail testing of expenditures, it was noted that the Organization did not maintain adequate documentation to support how certain costs were allocated to the federal program. Several transactions lacked sufficient detail, such as invoice or expense reimbursement form. Several expenditures selected for testing did not obtain sufficient approval by an individual at the Organization. It was noted that quarterly reports provided to the federal program were not reviewed by an individual at the Organization prior to submission to ensure accurate report of expenditures. Cause: The Organization does not have an adequate system in place to ensure quarterly reports have sufficient supporting documentation, proper approval/review, and accurate reporting prior to submission. Responsibilities for expenditure tracking were not clearly assigned, and there was no formal review process in place. The Organization is not following their Document Retention Policy. Effect: The effect of this condition increases the possibility that quarterly financial reports are misstated or inaccurate and increase the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements. The effect of this condition also increases the risk that expenditures are unallowable per the grant, federal regulations, or cost principles due to the insufficient support of proper approval retained. Questioned costs: None Repeat Finding: Yes - 2022-004 Recommendation: Policies and procedures should be in place to ensure quarterly financial reports are properly supported, accurately reported, and adequately approved and reviewed. A formal review process should be established to ensure compliance. The Organization should following the Document Retention Policy that was put in place and required by law. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and their response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-029 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-001) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 10.542) PANDEMIC EBT FOOD BENEFITS (P-EBT) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AWARD NUMBERS 221PR456S9032; 2301PR456S9032 (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED // REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our internal control procedures for the financial management system, allowable activities and reporting requirements, we found the following deficiencies: • Of ten (10) expenditure accounting transactions, three (3) were selected for documentation review. It was found that a transaction posted in August 2022 for $193,642,697.32 included $54,195,406.92, corresponding to benefit payrolls for May 2022, which had previously been claimed in June 2022. They subsequently adjusted the expenditure reported for this amount. • All expenditure transactions are coded under the ID number PANDEMICEBT-B22; although, in the SF-778 report for the quarter ended June 30, 2023, for the grant award period for 2023, expenditures in the amount of $29,606,939 were reported as incurred. This data does not agree with the accounting information of PRIFAS. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. After conducting several interviews, we were able to identify the staff responsible for validating the benefit payrolls. This person told us these benefit payrolls were processed via email, which indicated that the information submitted was preliminary. However, the finance staff proceeded with the adjustment in the accounting system. We conducted interviews to determine if anything had been modified in the benefit payroll processing process. To prevent this situation from happening again, they told us it wasn't necessary because it hasn't happened again. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statements and SEFA. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the federal awarding agency. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF has not established an adequate control procedure to identify duplicate claims before they are filed and recorded. During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the SF-425 reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. ADSEF lacks internal controls that allow for the timely validation and reconciliation of financial information. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The failure to have an internal control procedure that identifies standard documentation or forms, personnel responsible for validating the information included, and controls payroll and benefit expenses and other previously claimed expenses allowed for the recognition and claim of an expense incurred twice. ADSEF is not ensuring that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statements. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish an adequate internal controls process that identifies documentation, personnel responsible, authorizations, and validations that can prevent this situation from recurring. In addition, we recommend management to establish written procedures and internal controls manuals to provide and document the segregation of duties related to the reporting compliance requirement.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-030 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-002) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.489; 93.575 AND 93.596) CHILD CARE CLUSTER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBER G2101PRCDC6 (Federal Award Years: 2020 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE CARE AND COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN (ACUDEN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED // ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR Section 200.302 (b)(4) establishes that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. The non-Federal entity must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. In 2 CFR 200.405 (a)(1) establishes that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: is incurred specifically for the Federal award. In addition, 34 CFR 76.702 establishes that a State and a subgrantee shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures that insure proper disbursement of and accounting for Federal funds. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance with the allowable activities’ requirement, we selected a sample of forty-four (44) disbursements to suppliers made during the fiscal year under audit of a total population of 2,534. In one (1) instance, we found that the ACUDEN issued an advance payment to a supplier who in turn subcontracted with other suppliers for professional services or consumer education advertising campaign, media plan, and event coordination not performed, and that they had been invoiced in advance as of the invoice date. QUESTIONED COSTS $208,823.33. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. When the invoices reach the ACUDEN finance personnel in charge of the payment issuance process, they must review the invoice in all its parts, ensuring that the billed services are received accordingly, identifying the period of service performed. However, a supplier issued an invoice dated March 21, 2023, which included professional services of marketing for a consumer education campaign, media planning, and event coordination for the ACUDEN Child Care Program and PDG-B-5 programs. These services had been invoiced in advance for the period from April 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023 and during the payment process this situation was not detected and the payment for these services invoiced in advance was incorrectly issued on May 2, 2023, according to the disbursement voucher. During our inspection of the disbursement voucher, we noted the voucher had a note from de Finance Director indicating her refusing to authorize the disbursement voucher. However, although the disbursement voucher had this note, the Administrator signed the disbursement voucher and authorized the payment. STATEMENT OF CAUSE The lack of proper training and controls that requires standard evaluation and approval of expenditures incurred, in accordance with the state and Federal regulation. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ACUDEN incurred in overpayments to suppliers for services not rendered to ACUDEN. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend management to establish internal control processes consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR 200. In addition, design and implement internal control processes to meet the requirements of subrecipient monitoring and procurement standards.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-030 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-002) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.489; 93.575 AND 93.596) CHILD CARE CLUSTER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBER G2101PRCDC6 (Federal Award Years: 2020 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE CARE AND COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN (ACUDEN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED // ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR Section 200.302 (b)(4) establishes that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. The non-Federal entity must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. In 2 CFR 200.405 (a)(1) establishes that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: is incurred specifically for the Federal award. In addition, 34 CFR 76.702 establishes that a State and a subgrantee shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures that insure proper disbursement of and accounting for Federal funds. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance with the allowable activities’ requirement, we selected a sample of forty-four (44) disbursements to suppliers made during the fiscal year under audit of a total population of 2,534. In one (1) instance, we found that the ACUDEN issued an advance payment to a supplier who in turn subcontracted with other suppliers for professional services or consumer education advertising campaign, media plan, and event coordination not performed, and that they had been invoiced in advance as of the invoice date. QUESTIONED COSTS $208,823.33. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. When the invoices reach the ACUDEN finance personnel in charge of the payment issuance process, they must review the invoice in all its parts, ensuring that the billed services are received accordingly, identifying the period of service performed. However, a supplier issued an invoice dated March 21, 2023, which included professional services of marketing for a consumer education campaign, media planning, and event coordination for the ACUDEN Child Care Program and PDG-B-5 programs. These services had been invoiced in advance for the period from April 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023 and during the payment process this situation was not detected and the payment for these services invoiced in advance was incorrectly issued on May 2, 2023, according to the disbursement voucher. During our inspection of the disbursement voucher, we noted the voucher had a note from de Finance Director indicating her refusing to authorize the disbursement voucher. However, although the disbursement voucher had this note, the Administrator signed the disbursement voucher and authorized the payment. STATEMENT OF CAUSE The lack of proper training and controls that requires standard evaluation and approval of expenditures incurred, in accordance with the state and Federal regulation. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ACUDEN incurred in overpayments to suppliers for services not rendered to ACUDEN. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend management to establish internal control processes consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR 200. In addition, design and implement internal control processes to meet the requirements of subrecipient monitoring and procurement standards.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-030 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-002) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.489; 93.575 AND 93.596) CHILD CARE CLUSTER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBER G2101PRCDC6 (Federal Award Years: 2020 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE CARE AND COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN (ACUDEN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED // ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR Section 200.302 (b)(4) establishes that the financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. The non-Federal entity must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. In 2 CFR 200.405 (a)(1) establishes that a cost is allocable to a particular Federal award or other cost objective if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. This standard is met if the cost: is incurred specifically for the Federal award. In addition, 34 CFR 76.702 establishes that a State and a subgrantee shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures that insure proper disbursement of and accounting for Federal funds. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance with the allowable activities’ requirement, we selected a sample of forty-four (44) disbursements to suppliers made during the fiscal year under audit of a total population of 2,534. In one (1) instance, we found that the ACUDEN issued an advance payment to a supplier who in turn subcontracted with other suppliers for professional services or consumer education advertising campaign, media plan, and event coordination not performed, and that they had been invoiced in advance as of the invoice date. QUESTIONED COSTS $208,823.33. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. When the invoices reach the ACUDEN finance personnel in charge of the payment issuance process, they must review the invoice in all its parts, ensuring that the billed services are received accordingly, identifying the period of service performed. However, a supplier issued an invoice dated March 21, 2023, which included professional services of marketing for a consumer education campaign, media planning, and event coordination for the ACUDEN Child Care Program and PDG-B-5 programs. These services had been invoiced in advance for the period from April 1, 2023 through September 30, 2023 and during the payment process this situation was not detected and the payment for these services invoiced in advance was incorrectly issued on May 2, 2023, according to the disbursement voucher. During our inspection of the disbursement voucher, we noted the voucher had a note from de Finance Director indicating her refusing to authorize the disbursement voucher. However, although the disbursement voucher had this note, the Administrator signed the disbursement voucher and authorized the payment. STATEMENT OF CAUSE The lack of proper training and controls that requires standard evaluation and approval of expenditures incurred, in accordance with the state and Federal regulation. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ACUDEN incurred in overpayments to suppliers for services not rendered to ACUDEN. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend management to establish internal control processes consistent with the requirements of 2 CFR 200. In addition, design and implement internal control processes to meet the requirements of subrecipient monitoring and procurement standards.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-032 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-004) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) (ALN – 93.560) PAYMENT TO TERRITORIES – ADULT (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 211PR426S7003/4; 221PR426S7003/4; 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2021G996117; 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2022G9922PT; 2301PRTABD (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) 2201PRLIEA; 2301PRLIEA (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. (5) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures, we conducted an analysis of the process used to distribute administrative costs among the various programs administered by ADSEF. Administrative expenses are distributed based on a methodology called "Random Moment Sampling" (RMS). We identified the following deficiencies in the implementation and execution of this process: i. There is no written procedure that outlines the process for applying this formula for distributing administrative expenses. ii. There is no standardized monitoring or communication to ensure that employees who are required to complete this form are fully assigned to the roles subject to this process. In other words, the Human Resources Department or the Appointments Office do not communicate periodically or whenever a staff change occurs, in order to adjust the population subject to this questionnaire. iii. Among the options provided for responding to the RMS survey, three options are not assigned to a Federal program. These options include licenses; other types of work not directly tied to a Federal program function for which administrative expenses can be allocated. According to the State Plan, 3,300 questionnaires will be administered for functions performed by employees who are not at the central level, and 300 for employees who are at the central level. Two quarters of the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were observed, in which these three options represented between 33% and 22% for local offices and 29% at the central level. Because these options are not tied to a Federal program function, they reduce the percentage to zero and redistribute the percentage among Federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION We consider this deficiency a systemic problem. This allocation of administrative expenses is made quarterly; however, the adjustment in the accounting system (PRIFAS) is not necessarily made in the same period. The administrative expenses of each program contain the redistribution of expenses not assigned to a Federal program. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a written procedure establishing the process for implementing and monitoring the execution of this methodology. Additionally, among the responses regarding functions performed, time may be allocated to functions not related to Federal programs. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT They lack a standardized process that ensures that the methodology used allocates reasonable administrative costs among Federal programs, ensures that the distribution base is complete, and is periodically monitored. Furthermore, by redistributing the percentage of responses not directly related to a Federal program function, administrative costs could be claimed from Federal programs that should likely be allocated to state funds. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish a written internal control procedure that provides certainty, monitoring frequency, data validation, and responsibilities for those responsible for executing this process. Additionally, it should be considered that there are functions performed by the personnel in charge of answering the RMS that are not directly linked to a Federal program and should be assigned to state funds.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-032 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-004) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) (ALN – 93.560) PAYMENT TO TERRITORIES – ADULT (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 211PR426S7003/4; 221PR426S7003/4; 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2021G996117; 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2022G9922PT; 2301PRTABD (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) 2201PRLIEA; 2301PRLIEA (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. (5) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures, we conducted an analysis of the process used to distribute administrative costs among the various programs administered by ADSEF. Administrative expenses are distributed based on a methodology called "Random Moment Sampling" (RMS). We identified the following deficiencies in the implementation and execution of this process: i. There is no written procedure that outlines the process for applying this formula for distributing administrative expenses. ii. There is no standardized monitoring or communication to ensure that employees who are required to complete this form are fully assigned to the roles subject to this process. In other words, the Human Resources Department or the Appointments Office do not communicate periodically or whenever a staff change occurs, in order to adjust the population subject to this questionnaire. iii. Among the options provided for responding to the RMS survey, three options are not assigned to a Federal program. These options include licenses; other types of work not directly tied to a Federal program function for which administrative expenses can be allocated. According to the State Plan, 3,300 questionnaires will be administered for functions performed by employees who are not at the central level, and 300 for employees who are at the central level. Two quarters of the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were observed, in which these three options represented between 33% and 22% for local offices and 29% at the central level. Because these options are not tied to a Federal program function, they reduce the percentage to zero and redistribute the percentage among Federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION We consider this deficiency a systemic problem. This allocation of administrative expenses is made quarterly; however, the adjustment in the accounting system (PRIFAS) is not necessarily made in the same period. The administrative expenses of each program contain the redistribution of expenses not assigned to a Federal program. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a written procedure establishing the process for implementing and monitoring the execution of this methodology. Additionally, among the responses regarding functions performed, time may be allocated to functions not related to Federal programs. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT They lack a standardized process that ensures that the methodology used allocates reasonable administrative costs among Federal programs, ensures that the distribution base is complete, and is periodically monitored. Furthermore, by redistributing the percentage of responses not directly related to a Federal program function, administrative costs could be claimed from Federal programs that should likely be allocated to state funds. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish a written internal control procedure that provides certainty, monitoring frequency, data validation, and responsibilities for those responsible for executing this process. Additionally, it should be considered that there are functions performed by the personnel in charge of answering the RMS that are not directly linked to a Federal program and should be assigned to state funds.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-032 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-004) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) (ALN – 93.560) PAYMENT TO TERRITORIES – ADULT (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 211PR426S7003/4; 221PR426S7003/4; 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2021G996117; 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2022G9922PT; 2301PRTABD (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) 2201PRLIEA; 2301PRLIEA (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. (5) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures, we conducted an analysis of the process used to distribute administrative costs among the various programs administered by ADSEF. Administrative expenses are distributed based on a methodology called "Random Moment Sampling" (RMS). We identified the following deficiencies in the implementation and execution of this process: i. There is no written procedure that outlines the process for applying this formula for distributing administrative expenses. ii. There is no standardized monitoring or communication to ensure that employees who are required to complete this form are fully assigned to the roles subject to this process. In other words, the Human Resources Department or the Appointments Office do not communicate periodically or whenever a staff change occurs, in order to adjust the population subject to this questionnaire. iii. Among the options provided for responding to the RMS survey, three options are not assigned to a Federal program. These options include licenses; other types of work not directly tied to a Federal program function for which administrative expenses can be allocated. According to the State Plan, 3,300 questionnaires will be administered for functions performed by employees who are not at the central level, and 300 for employees who are at the central level. Two quarters of the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were observed, in which these three options represented between 33% and 22% for local offices and 29% at the central level. Because these options are not tied to a Federal program function, they reduce the percentage to zero and redistribute the percentage among Federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION We consider this deficiency a systemic problem. This allocation of administrative expenses is made quarterly; however, the adjustment in the accounting system (PRIFAS) is not necessarily made in the same period. The administrative expenses of each program contain the redistribution of expenses not assigned to a Federal program. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a written procedure establishing the process for implementing and monitoring the execution of this methodology. Additionally, among the responses regarding functions performed, time may be allocated to functions not related to Federal programs. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT They lack a standardized process that ensures that the methodology used allocates reasonable administrative costs among Federal programs, ensures that the distribution base is complete, and is periodically monitored. Furthermore, by redistributing the percentage of responses not directly related to a Federal program function, administrative costs could be claimed from Federal programs that should likely be allocated to state funds. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish a written internal control procedure that provides certainty, monitoring frequency, data validation, and responsibilities for those responsible for executing this process. Additionally, it should be considered that there are functions performed by the personnel in charge of answering the RMS that are not directly linked to a Federal program and should be assigned to state funds.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-032 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-004) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) (ALN – 93.560) PAYMENT TO TERRITORIES – ADULT (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 211PR426S7003/4; 221PR426S7003/4; 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2021G996117; 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2022G9922PT; 2301PRTABD (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) 2201PRLIEA; 2301PRLIEA (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. (5) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award. (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures, we conducted an analysis of the process used to distribute administrative costs among the various programs administered by ADSEF. Administrative expenses are distributed based on a methodology called "Random Moment Sampling" (RMS). We identified the following deficiencies in the implementation and execution of this process: i. There is no written procedure that outlines the process for applying this formula for distributing administrative expenses. ii. There is no standardized monitoring or communication to ensure that employees who are required to complete this form are fully assigned to the roles subject to this process. In other words, the Human Resources Department or the Appointments Office do not communicate periodically or whenever a staff change occurs, in order to adjust the population subject to this questionnaire. iii. Among the options provided for responding to the RMS survey, three options are not assigned to a Federal program. These options include licenses; other types of work not directly tied to a Federal program function for which administrative expenses can be allocated. According to the State Plan, 3,300 questionnaires will be administered for functions performed by employees who are not at the central level, and 300 for employees who are at the central level. Two quarters of the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 were observed, in which these three options represented between 33% and 22% for local offices and 29% at the central level. Because these options are not tied to a Federal program function, they reduce the percentage to zero and redistribute the percentage among Federal programs. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION We consider this deficiency a systemic problem. This allocation of administrative expenses is made quarterly; however, the adjustment in the accounting system (PRIFAS) is not necessarily made in the same period. The administrative expenses of each program contain the redistribution of expenses not assigned to a Federal program. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a written procedure establishing the process for implementing and monitoring the execution of this methodology. Additionally, among the responses regarding functions performed, time may be allocated to functions not related to Federal programs. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT They lack a standardized process that ensures that the methodology used allocates reasonable administrative costs among Federal programs, ensures that the distribution base is complete, and is periodically monitored. Furthermore, by redistributing the percentage of responses not directly related to a Federal program function, administrative costs could be claimed from Federal programs that should likely be allocated to state funds. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish a written internal control procedure that provides certainty, monitoring frequency, data validation, and responsibilities for those responsible for executing this process. Additionally, it should be considered that there are functions performed by the personnel in charge of answering the RMS that are not directly linked to a Federal program and should be assigned to state funds.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-033 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-005) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 211PR426S7003/4; 221PR426S7003/4; 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2021G990229 (TANF – COVID-19) (Federal Award Year: 2021) 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” In addition, 45 CFR 260.31 (b)(1), defines what non-recurrent, short-term (NRST) benefits are. In relation to Pandemic Emergency Assistance Fund (PEAF), the regulation establishes that: “NRST benefits, like all NRSTs under TANF, must: be designed to deal with a specific crisis situation or episode of need; not be intended to meet on-going needs; and not extend beyond four months; and (as explained in the instructions for reporting on line 15 of the ACF-196R) NRSTs paid for with PEAF funds: must only include expenditures such as emergency assistance and diversion payments, emergency housing and short-term homelessness assistance, emergency food aid, short-term utilities payments, burial assistance, clothing allowances, and back-to-school payments; and may not include tax credits, child care, transportation, or short-term education and training.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over transactions related to emissions of benefits for the TANF program, we selected five (5) transactions, from a population of fifty-three (53) emissions made during the fiscal year. We noted the following deficiencies: i. An emission of benefits for $16,236,447.24 related to PEAF funding was made. We request evidence of an established manual or guide that defines or identifies the need that would be addressed with the issuance of these funds, and the subsequent monitoring of the usage. ii. An emission of benefits for $3,633,800 was made related to a bonus. The documentation for this issuance includes an authorization letter establishing a benefit of $800 per child between the ages of 5 and 17 years and 11 months, serving a population of 4,492 participants, for a total of $3,593,600. Later, another authorization letter added $37,000 but did not specify the number of children included in this amendment. The sum of both authorizations is $3,630,600; however, the amount reflected in PRIFAS is $3,633,800. According to the EBT document related to this issuance, the amount issued was $3,596,800 and indicates that the number of participants benefited was 4,974, giving an average benefit of $723.12. In this EBT document, beneficiaries are distributed by region; however, there are 5 beneficiaries who are not assigned to a region, for a total of $4,000. iii. An emission of $1,988,000 was made related to an incentive for some beneficiaries. In accordance with an authorization letter, the benefit included $3,500 per participants who worked or participated in an activity leading to employment for 3 months or more. In accordance with the State Plan, active recipients may receive a 6-months period Work Incentive Bonus payment. Per the authorization letter the benefit of $3,500 was issued to 522 participants, for a total of $1,827,000; another authorization letter increased $3,500 in funds. This amount does not agree with the PRIFAS amount of $1,988,000. ADSEF is allowed to claim 16.80% of indirect costs. As part of our audit procedures over the Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico and TANF program, we selected some transactions to evaluate the compliance with the indirect costs claims. The TANF program reported four (4) transactions related to indirect costs, and for the Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico five (5) transactions were reported. We requested evidence of two (2) transactions for the TANF program and one (1) for the Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico, no evidence of class object was provided in order to ascertain that only allowable expenditure transactions were considered in the calculation and claim of indirect costs. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION We consider this deficiency a systemic problem. There are no processes to reconcile PRIFAS information with emissions reported in EBT, nor to claim indirect costs. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a process for validating EBT issuances with PRIFAS, and this reconciliation is not performed periodically to detect any errors or missing information when accounting for transactions. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The PRIFAS accounting system is not reconciled with EBT reports. This process is not stipulated as part of the internal controls required to ensure that the records used to prepare the financial statement, SEFA, and Federal reports are reconciled, and any discrepancies are identified. In addition, indirect costs calculation may include unallowable costs and not be detected timely. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish internal control processes to reconcile PRIFAS and the various sources of information used for reporting. Additionally, maintain clear records of indirect costs claimed and awarded.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-033 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-005) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 211PR426S7003/4; 221PR426S7003/4; 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2021G990229 (TANF – COVID-19) (Federal Award Year: 2021) 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” In addition, 45 CFR 260.31 (b)(1), defines what non-recurrent, short-term (NRST) benefits are. In relation to Pandemic Emergency Assistance Fund (PEAF), the regulation establishes that: “NRST benefits, like all NRSTs under TANF, must: be designed to deal with a specific crisis situation or episode of need; not be intended to meet on-going needs; and not extend beyond four months; and (as explained in the instructions for reporting on line 15 of the ACF-196R) NRSTs paid for with PEAF funds: must only include expenditures such as emergency assistance and diversion payments, emergency housing and short-term homelessness assistance, emergency food aid, short-term utilities payments, burial assistance, clothing allowances, and back-to-school payments; and may not include tax credits, child care, transportation, or short-term education and training.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over transactions related to emissions of benefits for the TANF program, we selected five (5) transactions, from a population of fifty-three (53) emissions made during the fiscal year. We noted the following deficiencies: i. An emission of benefits for $16,236,447.24 related to PEAF funding was made. We request evidence of an established manual or guide that defines or identifies the need that would be addressed with the issuance of these funds, and the subsequent monitoring of the usage. ii. An emission of benefits for $3,633,800 was made related to a bonus. The documentation for this issuance includes an authorization letter establishing a benefit of $800 per child between the ages of 5 and 17 years and 11 months, serving a population of 4,492 participants, for a total of $3,593,600. Later, another authorization letter added $37,000 but did not specify the number of children included in this amendment. The sum of both authorizations is $3,630,600; however, the amount reflected in PRIFAS is $3,633,800. According to the EBT document related to this issuance, the amount issued was $3,596,800 and indicates that the number of participants benefited was 4,974, giving an average benefit of $723.12. In this EBT document, beneficiaries are distributed by region; however, there are 5 beneficiaries who are not assigned to a region, for a total of $4,000. iii. An emission of $1,988,000 was made related to an incentive for some beneficiaries. In accordance with an authorization letter, the benefit included $3,500 per participants who worked or participated in an activity leading to employment for 3 months or more. In accordance with the State Plan, active recipients may receive a 6-months period Work Incentive Bonus payment. Per the authorization letter the benefit of $3,500 was issued to 522 participants, for a total of $1,827,000; another authorization letter increased $3,500 in funds. This amount does not agree with the PRIFAS amount of $1,988,000. ADSEF is allowed to claim 16.80% of indirect costs. As part of our audit procedures over the Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico and TANF program, we selected some transactions to evaluate the compliance with the indirect costs claims. The TANF program reported four (4) transactions related to indirect costs, and for the Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico five (5) transactions were reported. We requested evidence of two (2) transactions for the TANF program and one (1) for the Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico, no evidence of class object was provided in order to ascertain that only allowable expenditure transactions were considered in the calculation and claim of indirect costs. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION We consider this deficiency a systemic problem. There are no processes to reconcile PRIFAS information with emissions reported in EBT, nor to claim indirect costs. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a process for validating EBT issuances with PRIFAS, and this reconciliation is not performed periodically to detect any errors or missing information when accounting for transactions. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The PRIFAS accounting system is not reconciled with EBT reports. This process is not stipulated as part of the internal controls required to ensure that the records used to prepare the financial statement, SEFA, and Federal reports are reconciled, and any discrepancies are identified. In addition, indirect costs calculation may include unallowable costs and not be detected timely. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish internal control processes to reconcile PRIFAS and the various sources of information used for reporting. Additionally, maintain clear records of indirect costs claimed and awarded.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-034 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-006) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.556) MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.556) COVID-19 – MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.667) SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRFPSS; 2101PRFPSC; 2101PRFPCV; 2202PRFPCV; 2203PRFPSS (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2111PRSOSR; 2211PRSOSR (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN (ADFAN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES // CASH MANAGEMENT TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures, we verified the requirements for the written procedures policies, and we didn’t obtain by ADFAN the required documentation. This represents a scope limitation. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem that is related to lack of proper training, segregation of duties and written policies and procedures. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADFAN has not established a work plan to maintain the written procedures policies required by the Uniform Guidance. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The absence of written procedures may lead to inconsistent program implementation, unclear assignment of responsibilities, and inadequate oversight. This increases the risk of noncompliance with applicable regulations, inefficiencies in operations, and reduced effectiveness in achieving program objectives. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that ADFAN develop, formalize, and implement comprehensive written procedures for the programs to comply with the Uniform Guidance. These procedures should clearly define roles and responsibilities, establish operational workflows, and include mechanisms for monitoring and compliance. Doing so will help ensure consistency in program execution, accountability, and alignment with regulatory and performance requirements.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-034 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-006) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.556) MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.556) COVID-19 – MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.667) SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRFPSS; 2101PRFPSC; 2101PRFPCV; 2202PRFPCV; 2203PRFPSS (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2111PRSOSR; 2211PRSOSR (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN (ADFAN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES // CASH MANAGEMENT TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures, we verified the requirements for the written procedures policies, and we didn’t obtain by ADFAN the required documentation. This represents a scope limitation. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem that is related to lack of proper training, segregation of duties and written policies and procedures. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADFAN has not established a work plan to maintain the written procedures policies required by the Uniform Guidance. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The absence of written procedures may lead to inconsistent program implementation, unclear assignment of responsibilities, and inadequate oversight. This increases the risk of noncompliance with applicable regulations, inefficiencies in operations, and reduced effectiveness in achieving program objectives. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that ADFAN develop, formalize, and implement comprehensive written procedures for the programs to comply with the Uniform Guidance. These procedures should clearly define roles and responsibilities, establish operational workflows, and include mechanisms for monitoring and compliance. Doing so will help ensure consistency in program execution, accountability, and alignment with regulatory and performance requirements.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-034 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-006) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.556) MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.556) COVID-19 – MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.667) SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRFPSS; 2101PRFPSC; 2101PRFPCV; 2202PRFPCV; 2203PRFPSS (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2111PRSOSR; 2211PRSOSR (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN (ADFAN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT ALLOWABLE COSTS/COSTS PRINCIPLES // CASH MANAGEMENT TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450). (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures, we verified the requirements for the written procedures policies, and we didn’t obtain by ADFAN the required documentation. This represents a scope limitation. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem that is related to lack of proper training, segregation of duties and written policies and procedures. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADFAN has not established a work plan to maintain the written procedures policies required by the Uniform Guidance. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The absence of written procedures may lead to inconsistent program implementation, unclear assignment of responsibilities, and inadequate oversight. This increases the risk of noncompliance with applicable regulations, inefficiencies in operations, and reduced effectiveness in achieving program objectives. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that ADFAN develop, formalize, and implement comprehensive written procedures for the programs to comply with the Uniform Guidance. These procedures should clearly define roles and responsibilities, establish operational workflows, and include mechanisms for monitoring and compliance. Doing so will help ensure consistency in program execution, accountability, and alignment with regulatory and performance requirements.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-035 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-007) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE (ALN – 93.568) COVID-19 – LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRLIEA; 2201PRLIEA; 2301PRLIEA; 2001PRLIEA; 2001PRE5C3 (Federal Award Years: 2020 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT CASH MANAGEMENT TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.302, requires recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following: (3) maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation; (4) effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303; and (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. 2 CFR 200.305, Federal Payments, establishes that: (a) payments for States are governed by Treasury-State Cash Management Improvement Act (CMIA) agreements and default procedures codified at 31 CFR part 205 and Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) 4A-2000, “Overall Disbursing Rules for All Federal Agencies”; (b) for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. See § 200.302(b)(6). Except as noted in this part, the Federal agency must require recipients to use only OMB-approved, government-wide information collections to request payment. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our understanding of internal controls and compliance regarding cash management, we obtained a procedures manual. We found the following deficiencies: 1. The effective date is April 2024. 2. In the section describing the LIHEAP process, the US Department of Agriculture is mentioned instead of the US Department of Health and Human Services. 3. It does not identify the personnel responsible for the processes to establish segregation of duties. 4. In our interviews it was noted that only one person is in charge of all drawdowns, and no proper supervision or review of the documentation is performed. In addition, a detail of the requests related to the program was obtained; however, this request information does not reconcile with the revenue recognized in PRIFAS. The following deficiencies were identified: 1. The document includes amounts identified as LIHEAP, which belong to another Federal program, the Low-Income Household Water Assistance Program (ALN 93.499), in the amount of $4,590,528. 2. The amount of $306,483.12 is presented twice and is only recognized in PRIFAS once. 3. PRIFAS includes revenue of $3,900,000 related to the COVID-19 portion of funds, which is not included in the breakdown. From a population of fifty-seven (57) revenue transactions, six (6) transactions were selected to ensure that the correct amounts were requested from the Federal program and that the documents indicated in the manual were included with each petition. The following deficiencies were observed: 1. The documents included do not contain signatures from the personnel who perform each process. 2. The documentation included in the manual does not match the documentation included in the documents submitted with each petition. 3. In an emission of ARPA funding through LUMA, part of the documentation provided was document EMISM210, which stated that the authorized amount was $16,014,374. In a recap made in the document (not signed), the amount of $4,181 was adjusted in the petition, indicating that this amount was rejected by LUMA. In a letter from LUMA, they certified that the total cases reported were 327,499 for a total amount of $16,010,193. A detail of participants was provided, and the total was 327,498, although the benefits were $16,010,193. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem, lack of proper training and updated information to all personnel with the responsibility of determining, supervising, and monitoring the eligibility determinations and follow-up. The sampling was a statistical valid sample. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a procedures manual that clearly establishes a segregation of duties, demonstrating compliance with the required internal control components. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT This is a systematic deficiency. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish a written internal controls process that demonstrates compliance with cash management requirements and appropriate segregation of duties.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-035 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-007) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE (ALN – 93.568) COVID-19 – LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRLIEA; 2201PRLIEA; 2301PRLIEA; 2001PRLIEA; 2001PRE5C3 (Federal Award Years: 2020 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT CASH MANAGEMENT TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.302, requires recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following: (3) maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation; (4) effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303; and (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305. 2 CFR 200.305, Federal Payments, establishes that: (a) payments for States are governed by Treasury-State Cash Management Improvement Act (CMIA) agreements and default procedures codified at 31 CFR part 205 and Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) 4A-2000, “Overall Disbursing Rules for All Federal Agencies”; (b) for recipients and subrecipients other than States, payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the Federal agency or the pass-through entity and the disbursement of funds by the recipient or subrecipient regardless of whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer or by other means. See § 200.302(b)(6). Except as noted in this part, the Federal agency must require recipients to use only OMB-approved, government-wide information collections to request payment. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our understanding of internal controls and compliance regarding cash management, we obtained a procedures manual. We found the following deficiencies: 1. The effective date is April 2024. 2. In the section describing the LIHEAP process, the US Department of Agriculture is mentioned instead of the US Department of Health and Human Services. 3. It does not identify the personnel responsible for the processes to establish segregation of duties. 4. In our interviews it was noted that only one person is in charge of all drawdowns, and no proper supervision or review of the documentation is performed. In addition, a detail of the requests related to the program was obtained; however, this request information does not reconcile with the revenue recognized in PRIFAS. The following deficiencies were identified: 1. The document includes amounts identified as LIHEAP, which belong to another Federal program, the Low-Income Household Water Assistance Program (ALN 93.499), in the amount of $4,590,528. 2. The amount of $306,483.12 is presented twice and is only recognized in PRIFAS once. 3. PRIFAS includes revenue of $3,900,000 related to the COVID-19 portion of funds, which is not included in the breakdown. From a population of fifty-seven (57) revenue transactions, six (6) transactions were selected to ensure that the correct amounts were requested from the Federal program and that the documents indicated in the manual were included with each petition. The following deficiencies were observed: 1. The documents included do not contain signatures from the personnel who perform each process. 2. The documentation included in the manual does not match the documentation included in the documents submitted with each petition. 3. In an emission of ARPA funding through LUMA, part of the documentation provided was document EMISM210, which stated that the authorized amount was $16,014,374. In a recap made in the document (not signed), the amount of $4,181 was adjusted in the petition, indicating that this amount was rejected by LUMA. In a letter from LUMA, they certified that the total cases reported were 327,499 for a total amount of $16,010,193. A detail of participants was provided, and the total was 327,498, although the benefits were $16,010,193. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem, lack of proper training and updated information to all personnel with the responsibility of determining, supervising, and monitoring the eligibility determinations and follow-up. The sampling was a statistical valid sample. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not have a procedures manual that clearly establishes a segregation of duties, demonstrating compliance with the required internal control components. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT This is a systematic deficiency. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish a written internal controls process that demonstrates compliance with cash management requirements and appropriate segregation of duties.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-049 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-020) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AWARD NUMBERS 221PR426S7003/4; 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 211PR476V1003/4 – ARPA (Federal Award Years: March 11, 2021 through September 30, 2025) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302, Financial Management, establishes that (a) each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. In section (b), the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): … (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The 2 CFR §200.303 (a) establishes that the recipient and subrecipient must: establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance for reporting requirements, we selected two reports that closed during our fiscal year audit. With respect with the Grant Award 221PR426S7003 and 221PR426S7004 we noted the following deficiency: • The auditee was unable to provide supporting documentation for the administrative expenditures that reconcile the figures reported with the PRIFAS accounting system. • In addition, for all the Federal awards mentioned above, based on internal control interviews, we found that there is no designated individual responsible for independently reviewing the reports prior to submission to ensure accuracy and consistency with source data. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to Federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statement and SEFA. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the Federal awarding agency. STATEMENT OF CAUSE During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the required reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the Federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend ADSEF establish written internal controls and specific procedures to ensure that all reported amounts are fully supported and reconciled with the PRIFAS accounting system and to assign responsibility to a designated official to review and approve all reports prior to submission to the Federal agency. Implement internal controls to maintain adequate documentation supporting all financial data reported.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-051 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-021) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRLIEA (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450.) (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over the reporting requirement for LIHEAP program, we selected two reports submitted during our fiscal year. We noted that the administrative expenditures do not reconcile with the accounting information from PRIFAS. In addition, for the amount of encumbrances of $11,032,784.51, the amount of $9,943,769.52 was not supported by a detail. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statements and SEFA. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the Federal awarding agency. STATEMENT OF CAUSE During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the SF– 425 reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. ADSEF lacks internal controls that allow for the timely validation and reconciliation of financial information. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the Federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend ADSEF to establish written procedures and internal controls manuals to provide and document the segregation of duties related to the reporting compliance requirement.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-052 FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2021G996117; 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – PERFORMANCE TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA In accordance with 45 CFR, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Part 265.7, states that: (a) Each State's quarterly reports [the TANF Data Report, the TANF Financial Report (or Territorial Financial Report), the SSP-MOE Data Report, and the Work Outcomes of TANF Exciters Report] must be complete and accurate and filed by the due date. (b) For a disaggregated data report, “a complete and accurate report” means that: (1) The reported data accurately reflects information available to the State in case records, financial records, and automated data systems, and includes correction of the quarterly data by the end of the fiscal year reporting period; (2) The data are free from computational errors and are internally consistent (e.g., items that should add to totals do so); (3) The State reports data for all required elements (i.e., no data is missing); (4) (i) The State provides data on all families; or (ii) If the State opts to use sampling, the State reports data on all families selected in a sample that meets the specification and procedures in the TANF Sampling Manual (except for families listed in error); and (5) Where estimates are necessary (e.g., some types of assistance may require cost estimates), the State uses reasonable methods to develop these estimates. (c) For an aggregated data report, “a complete and accurate report” means that: (1) The reported data accurately reflects information available to the State in case records, financial records, and automated data systems; (2) The data are free from computational errors and are internally consistent (e.g., items that should add to totals do so); (3) The State reports data on all applicable elements; and (4) Monthly totals are unduplicated counts for all families (e.g., the number of families and the number of out-of-wedlock births are unduplicated counts). In addition, 2 CFR § 200.302 (a) establishes that each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. In section (b) the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our procedures for understanding internal controls for the preparation of ACF-199 reports, we request a procedures manual on how these reports are processed and the personnel responsible for each process. ADSEF did not provide us with a manual describing the data collection process, how the information provided by the regions is validated, and the individuals responsible for submitting the reports. To evaluate compliance with the reported data, the quarter ending June 2023 was selected. From this period, forty (40) participants were selected. ADSEF was required to provide us with the corresponding participant worksheet appendix and the physical file to corroborate the information included in the report. ADSEF provided us with evidence of the hand-completed forms; however, we were not provided with the physical files to validate the information included in each document. This represents a scope limitation. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systemic deficiency. After sample selection, ADSEF did not demonstrate a control structure that would allow the files to be located within a reasonable period of time. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF does not maintain an internal control structure for participant files that allows each file to be located within a reasonable period of time. Additionally, they do not have internal control procedure manuals that allow for the validation of the process they carry out and the individuals responsible for compiling, validating, and submitting this report. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF may be including data in this report that has not been corroborated with the participants' physical records. The lack of a uniform process for archiving participant records prevented them from providing us with evidence of the requested records. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish internal control procedures manuals that clearly outline the processes to be followed for data collection, recording, and reporting. Additionally, standardize the way documents related to participant files are filed.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-054 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-023) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.556) MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.667) SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRFPSS (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2022) 2211PRSOSR (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2022) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN (ADFAN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302 (a) establishes that each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. In addition, the SF-425 Federal Financial Report requires the reporting of financial activities related to Federal awards. The accounting basis used for reporting expenditures (whether cash or accrual) must align with the accounting system employed by the recipient organization. The 2 CFR § 200.302 (b), establish that the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The 2 CFR section 200.328(c) establishes that the recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award. Reports submitted annually by the recipient or subrecipient must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. The 2 CFR §200.303 (a) establishes that the recipient and subrecipient must: establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance for reporting requirements, we selected the Grants Awards 2101PRFPSS and 2111PRSOSR, which closes in the audit period from July 2022 to June 2023, to validate the recorded amounts. Upon evaluating the report for the Grant Award 2101PRFPSS, we found the following deficiencies: (1) The total Federal expenditure reported on line (e) does not match the database provided by the PRDF. (2) The matching expenditure on line (j) does not match the database provided by the PRDF, and (3) The report was not submitted within the established deadline, and an extension was granted to settle and report the funds until March 31, 2023, and they submitted on August 10, 2023. For both Grants Awards we found the following deficiencies: (4) The accounting basis should be Cash Basis instead of Accrual Basis, according to the accounting system used. Additionally, they provided a Procedures Manual for the Finance and Budget Divisions, approved in 2009 and delivered in Word format, which states that the accounting basis is “accrual”, even though their current system operates on a cash basis. (5) During the internal control’s interviews, we found that there is no designated person responsible for reviewing the information entered by the preparer. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, training, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to Federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statement and SEFA. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADFAN does not have internal controls to effectively review the process and comply with the reporting requirements. The absence of effective internal controls at ADFAN to review processes and ensure compliance with reporting requirements can be attributed to inadequate organizational structure and insufficiently defined roles and responsibilities. There is no designated individual or team responsible for overseeing the accuracy and completeness of financial data entered reports. As mentioned above in the statement of condition, this responsibility falls under one person and does not have segregation of duties. This gap in accountability stems from a lack of internal review and insufficient oversight mechanisms, which restrains the organization's ability to ensure that reports are fully aligned with the required compliance standards. Additionally, there is a lack of training or resources dedicated to maintaining and monitoring compliance which contributes to the failure in reporting requirements. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADFAN does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports for the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that ADFAN ensures the SF– 425 is completed using the appropriate accounting basis consistent with the organization’s financial system. Additionally, ADFAN should establish and implement internal control procedures that include formal review process to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported information and designate responsible personnel for the review and approval of reports prior to submission to ensure compliance with Federal reporting requirements.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-054 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-023) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.556) MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.667) SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2101PRFPSS (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2022) 2211PRSOSR (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2022) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN (ADFAN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302 (a) establishes that each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. In addition, the SF-425 Federal Financial Report requires the reporting of financial activities related to Federal awards. The accounting basis used for reporting expenditures (whether cash or accrual) must align with the accounting system employed by the recipient organization. The 2 CFR § 200.302 (b), establish that the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The 2 CFR section 200.328(c) establishes that the recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award. Reports submitted annually by the recipient or subrecipient must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. The 2 CFR §200.303 (a) establishes that the recipient and subrecipient must: establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance for reporting requirements, we selected the Grants Awards 2101PRFPSS and 2111PRSOSR, which closes in the audit period from July 2022 to June 2023, to validate the recorded amounts. Upon evaluating the report for the Grant Award 2101PRFPSS, we found the following deficiencies: (1) The total Federal expenditure reported on line (e) does not match the database provided by the PRDF. (2) The matching expenditure on line (j) does not match the database provided by the PRDF, and (3) The report was not submitted within the established deadline, and an extension was granted to settle and report the funds until March 31, 2023, and they submitted on August 10, 2023. For both Grants Awards we found the following deficiencies: (4) The accounting basis should be Cash Basis instead of Accrual Basis, according to the accounting system used. Additionally, they provided a Procedures Manual for the Finance and Budget Divisions, approved in 2009 and delivered in Word format, which states that the accounting basis is “accrual”, even though their current system operates on a cash basis. (5) During the internal control’s interviews, we found that there is no designated person responsible for reviewing the information entered by the preparer. QUESTIONED COSTS No questioned costs identified. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, training, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to Federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statement and SEFA. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADFAN does not have internal controls to effectively review the process and comply with the reporting requirements. The absence of effective internal controls at ADFAN to review processes and ensure compliance with reporting requirements can be attributed to inadequate organizational structure and insufficiently defined roles and responsibilities. There is no designated individual or team responsible for overseeing the accuracy and completeness of financial data entered reports. As mentioned above in the statement of condition, this responsibility falls under one person and does not have segregation of duties. This gap in accountability stems from a lack of internal review and insufficient oversight mechanisms, which restrains the organization's ability to ensure that reports are fully aligned with the required compliance standards. Additionally, there is a lack of training or resources dedicated to maintaining and monitoring compliance which contributes to the failure in reporting requirements. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADFAN does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports for the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that ADFAN ensures the SF– 425 is completed using the appropriate accounting basis consistent with the organization’s financial system. Additionally, ADFAN should establish and implement internal control procedures that include formal review process to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported information and designate responsible personnel for the review and approval of reports prior to submission to ensure compliance with Federal reporting requirements.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-055 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-024) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 96.001) SOCIAL SECURITY–DISABILITY INSURANCE U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AWARD NUMBERS 1804RQD100; 1904RQD100; 2004RQD100; 2104RQD100; 2204RQD100; 2304RQD100 (Federal Award Years: 2018 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARIAT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – FINANCIAL TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA According to the Program Operations Manual (POMS) DI 39506.203-Updating and Reconciling Unliquidated Obligations published by the Social Security Administration (SSA), legitimate unliquidated obligations must be backed up by records or papers that explain the nature of the obligations and provide evidence for the amounts reported. It is also crucial that the agency's reported unliquidated obligations reflect any modifications or cancellations of Consultative Examinations (CE) and Medical Evidence of Record (MER) authorizations. State authorities should check CE authorizations to see if the unliquidated obligation is an authorization that is still in existence and evaluate unliquidated obligations at least once a month to cancel those that are no longer valid. POMS 39506.210 Preparations Instructions for Form SSA-4513 instructs the State Agency to check the appropriate box in the report to indicate the attachment of Form-871. Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management Section (a) establish the administrative requirements for the program, which include the requirement that state and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION The State Agency Report of Obligations for SSA Disability Programs, Form Report SSA-4513, was incomplete and inaccurate. During the audit procedures the following deficiencies were noted by us: i. It was not specified in the Puerto Rico Disability Determination Services (PR-DDS) Accounting Department's Form SSA-4513 for September 2022 and June 2023 if Form SSA-871, State Agency Schedule for Equipment Purchases for SSA Disability Programs, had to be included with Form SSA-4513 for FYs 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, and 2018. Whether this was necessary or not is unknown. ii. Information about unliquidated obligations for FYs 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, and 2018 were absent from September 2022 Form SSA-4513. iii. Information regarding Unliquidated Obligations for each of the specified reporting periods was absent from June 2023 Form SSA-4513. 1) FY 2023's unliquidated obligations are not detailed. In its Form SSA-4513, the PR-DDS included unliquidated commitments, which accounted for 20% of the overall obligation balances. 2) The reported balances of unliquidated commitments for FY 2022 are not supported by any information. In its Form SSA-4513, the PR-DDS included unliquidated commitments, which accounted for 8% of the overall obligation balances. 3) Reported balances of unliquidated debts for FYs 2021, 2020, and 2019 are not supported by any information. iv. There were discrepancies between the accounting system and the total amount of disbursements on Form SSA-4513 for June 2023, and no observations were submitted in the report remarks section. 1) $237,231 discrepancy in FY 2022 2) $40,907 discrepancy in FY 2021 3) $8,800 discrepancy in FY 2020 4) $33,458 discrepancy in FY 2019 5) $49,179 discrepancy in FY 2018 v. The PR-DDS paid back $112,443 to the Puerto Rico Treasury Department in fiscal year 2023 to offset FY 2018 expenses that were not fully utilized in prior years. Because an expense is reported at the time a request is registered by the PR-DDS Accounting Department Special Payer, this resulted in an overstatement in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and in the quarterly reports. vi. The PR-DDS Accounting Department received a request refund of $1,242,212 from the SSA for fiscal years 2019, 2020, and 2021 during March 2023 SSA-4513. Because there was not enough evidence in the March report to warrant an increase in obligations, the request was based on excess withdrawals exceeding total commitments recorded in FORM SSA-4513 for March 2023. In fiscal year 2023, $397,740 was repaid by the PR-DDS Accounting Department. QUESTIONED COSTS Undetermined. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. Information needed to effectively generate financial reports should be available through the financial management system. STATEMENT OF CAUSE Internal controls is not in place in the PR-DDS Accounting Department to ensure that vendor payments are processed on schedule. Furthermore, as mandated by DI 39506.203, the PR-DDS Accounting Department has not put monitoring measures in place to routinely assess unliquidated commitments. Furthermore, the PR-DDS Accounting Department lacks internal procedures for recording discrepancies between financial reporting and accounting systems. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The PR-DDS raises the possibility of incurred costs without the option to obtain reimbursement from the Federal grant if appropriate procedures are not in place to pay suppliers on time and liquidate obligations on time. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend the Accounting Department of PR-DDS establish procedures to make sure Form SSA-4513 is properly examined, recorded, and compliant with POMS DI 39506.203. To cancel commitments that are no longer valid, we advise the PR-DDS Accounting Department to check unliquidated obligations at least once a month. For FYs 2020 and 2021, we advise the PR-DDS to ascertain the number of disbursements, restrict the reimbursement to that sum prior to deducting money, and repay SSA for any overdrafts that remain. Furthermore, we recommend a formal reconciliation between the quarterly reports and the accounting system-documented disbursements, with an explanation of any discrepancies included in remarks of the Form SSA-4513.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-056 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-025) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) (ALN – 93.560) PAYMENT TO TERRITORIES – ADULT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2021G996117; 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2022G9922PT; 2301PRTABD (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – FINANCIAL TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA The 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over the reporting requirement for TANF and Payment to Territories – Adult programs, we selected two reports submitted during our fiscal year. We found the following deficiencies: i. Administrative expenditures related to both programs are recorded under the same accounting account number, and the assistance listing number of TANF. That is, in PRIFAS, the administrative expenditures of both programs are not segregated by grant award and assistance listing number. ii. The ACF-196TR reports report expenditures under both programs that are not reconciled with the PRIFAS accounting system, specifically in administrative expenditures. We requested evidence of the expenditures incurred or details that were used to prepare the reports; this information was not available, and it was generated upon our request. iii. In both reports evaluated, the amounts reported on lines 2 and 3, related to the amounts that the TANF program transfers to two other federal programs, are recorded inconsistently. During the quarters from October to June, these lines report the amount of the budget that is allowed to be transferred, without validating whether the Federal programs incurred any expenditures. In the quarterly report of September, the expenditure for these lines is reported based on the amount of drawdowns incurred. This practice is inconsistent and does not reflect the actual expenditure incurred. iv. In the quarterly report of June 2023, an expenditure of $3,733,668 was reported on line 5(a). According to PRIFAS, the reported expenditure was $1,988,000. QUESTIONED COSTS Undetermined. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statements and SEFA. In addition, the financial management system should provide to account separately the administrative expenditures incurred among all Federal programs administered. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the federal awarding agency. STATEMENT OF CAUSE During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the ACF-196TR reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. PRIFAS accounting data base as configured, does not provide for the administrative expenditures incurred from the TANF and Payment to Territories – Adult program to be segregated. ADSEF lacks internal controls that allow for the timely validation and reconciliation of financial information. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend ADSEF to establish written procedures and internal controls manuals to provide and document the segregation of duties related to the reporting compliance requirement. Additionally, work with the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury to provide accounting records to segregate the administrative expenditures of both programs.
FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2023-056 (See Finding Reference Number 2023-025) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) (ALN – 93.560) PAYMENT TO TERRITORIES – ADULT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2021G996117; 2022G996117; 2023996117 (Federal Award Years: 2021 through 2023) 2022G9922PT; 2301PRTABD (Federal Award Years: 2022 through 2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – FINANCIAL TYPE OF FINDING MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE AND MATERIAL WEAKNESS CRITERIA The 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over the reporting requirement for TANF and Payment to Territories – Adult programs, we selected two reports submitted during our fiscal year. We found the following deficiencies: i. Administrative expenditures related to both programs are recorded under the same accounting account number, and the assistance listing number of TANF. That is, in PRIFAS, the administrative expenditures of both programs are not segregated by grant award and assistance listing number. ii. The ACF-196TR reports report expenditures under both programs that are not reconciled with the PRIFAS accounting system, specifically in administrative expenditures. We requested evidence of the expenditures incurred or details that were used to prepare the reports; this information was not available, and it was generated upon our request. iii. In both reports evaluated, the amounts reported on lines 2 and 3, related to the amounts that the TANF program transfers to two other federal programs, are recorded inconsistently. During the quarters from October to June, these lines report the amount of the budget that is allowed to be transferred, without validating whether the Federal programs incurred any expenditures. In the quarterly report of September, the expenditure for these lines is reported based on the amount of drawdowns incurred. This practice is inconsistent and does not reflect the actual expenditure incurred. iv. In the quarterly report of June 2023, an expenditure of $3,733,668 was reported on line 5(a). According to PRIFAS, the reported expenditure was $1,988,000. QUESTIONED COSTS Undetermined. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statements and SEFA. In addition, the financial management system should provide to account separately the administrative expenditures incurred among all Federal programs administered. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the federal awarding agency. STATEMENT OF CAUSE During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the ACF-196TR reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. PRIFAS accounting data base as configured, does not provide for the administrative expenditures incurred from the TANF and Payment to Territories – Adult program to be segregated. ADSEF lacks internal controls that allow for the timely validation and reconciliation of financial information. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend ADSEF to establish written procedures and internal controls manuals to provide and document the segregation of duties related to the reporting compliance requirement. Additionally, work with the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury to provide accounting records to segregate the administrative expenditures of both programs.
2023-001 Supporting Documentation and Approval of Disbursements Federal Program - U.S. Department of the Treasury – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ALN 21.027) Federal Award Number - SLFRP0136 Compliance Requirement - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (2 CFR § 200.403 and § 200.302) Criteria - Per 2 CFR § 200.403(g), to be allowable under a federal award, costs must be adequately documented. Additionally, 2 CFR § 200.302 requires the non-Federal entity to establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance of compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. Condition - During our testing of expense and disbursement transactions charged to the federal program, we identified instances where payments were made without adequate supporting documentation or evidence of appropriate review and approval. While the costs appear consistent with the purpose of the program and are considered allowable in nature, the absence of documentation limits the ability to verify the appropriateness and accuracy of the expenditures. A majority of these transactions were related to temporary housing assistance, including payments to hotels. Cause - The organization does not currently have or did not follow a formal process to ensure that all disbursements are properly documented and reviewed. Effect - Failure to maintain adequate documentation impairs the organization’s ability to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements and increases the risk of errors or inappropriate expenditures going undetected. Questioned Costs - $0. No costs are questioned at this time, as the disbursements appear consistent with program objectives. Recommendation - We recommend that the organization strengthen internal controls over the disbursement process by implementing procedures requiring all expenses to be supported by documentation such as invoices or receipts and be reviewed and approved by appropriate personnel prior to payment. This is especially important for recurring or program-critical costs such as temporary housing. Views of Responsible Officials - we agree with the finding and determined it was due to an oversight by the organization on establishing proper procedures for a new program. Verbal communications were not recorded appropriately and approvals were not signed by management.
Type of finding: Federal Award. Situation: Material weakness; Material noncompliance with federal regulations. Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing 21.027 Compliance Requirements: Activities allowed or unallowed / Allowable costs/Cost Principle Prior-Year(s) Audit Finding(s): 2022-004 Questioned Costs: $164,619 Condition: The Municipality could not provide supporting documentation for the disbursement of $164,619 of program funds. Documentation for the disbursement of $164,619 of program funds was not identified by the Municipality nor provided for our review, therefore we could not ascertain that the disbursements complied with program regulations. Context: The Municipality recognized as revenue $3,518,621 during the fiscal year ended on June 30, 2023. A total of $164,619 of program funds were disbursed without sufficient and appropriate documentation. The Municipality indicated that Revenue Replacement was their only project expenditure category on their annual March 2023 SLFRF Compliance Report. Revenue loss in and of itself is not an eligible use. Instead, recipients calculate lost revenue based on the formula provided in the Interim Final Rule and Final Rule to determine the limit for funds that can be used for the provision of government services. Entities are expected to use the direct payments to meet pandemic response needs and rebuild a strong, more equitable economy as the country recovers. Interim and final regulations state that recipients may not use funds to pay interest or principal on outstanding debt, as these expenses would not address the needs of pandemic response or its negative economic impacts. Such expenses would also not be considered provision of government services, as these financing expenses do not directly provide services or aid to citizens. The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds program is authorized by sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act as added by section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Pub. L. No. 117-2 (Mar. 11, 2021). Recipients may use payments from the Fund to among other things, replace lost public sector revenue to provide government services. Criteria: Uniform Guidance states in 2 CFR 200.403 that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. As per 2 CFR 200.302 the other non-Federal entity’s financial management system must provide for the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. Further, Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Award terms and conditions state the following regarding the maintenance of and Access to Records: 1. Recipient shall maintain records and financial documents sufficient to evidence compliance with section 603 © of the Act, Treasury’s regulations implementing that section, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing. 2. The Treasury Office of Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office, or their authorized representatives, shall have the right of access of records (electronic or otherwise) of Recipient in order to conduct audits or other investigations. 3. Records shall be maintained by the Recipient for a period of five (5) years after all funds have been expended or returned the Treasury, whichever is later. Cause: The Municipality applied inconsistent program procedures to disbursement transactions totaling $164,619. Effect: Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Award terms and conditions state the following regarding Remedial Actions: In the event of recipient’s noncompliance with section 603 of the Act, other applicable laws, Treasury’s implementing regulations, guidance, or any reporting or other program requirements, Treasury may impose additional conditions on the receipt of a subsequent tranche of future award funds, if any, or take other available remedies as set forth in 2 CFR 200.339. In case of a violation of section 603 © of the Act regarding the use of funds, previous payments shall be subject to recoupment as provided in section 603 © of the Act. Auditor’s recommendation: The Municipality must strengthen internal controls and procedures to ensure that disbursement of program funds is properly documented and allowed under program regulations. The Municipality must ensure that all documentation that serves as evidence for eligible expenses be preserved and maintained for at least five years. 2023-003, cont. Views of Responsible officials and corrective actions:
Type of finding: Federal Award. Situation: Material weakness; material noncompliance with federal regulations. Federal Program: Disaster Grants – Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Assistance Listing 97.036 Compliance Requirements: Activities allowed or unallowed / Allowable costs/Cost Principle Prior-Year(s) Audit Finding(s): 2022-005, 2021-002 Questioned Costs: $14,435 Condition: The Municipality could not provide supporting documentation for the disbursement of $14,435 of program funds. Documentation for the disbursement of $14,435 of program funds was not identified by the Municipality nor provided for our review, therefore we could not ascertain that the disbursements complied with program regulations. Context: A total of $14,435 of program funds were disbursed without sufficient and appropriate documentation. In previous years, program funds were also disbursed without sufficient and appropriate documentation and were accounted for as increases in the due from other funds account. The Municipality repaid during the current year the amount of $49,839. As of June 30, 2023 the balance of the due from other funds account is $505,271. Program regulation states that costs must be directly tied to the performance of eligible work; adequately documented; reduced by all applicable credits, such as insurance proceeds and salvage values; authorized and not prohibited under Federal or State government laws or regulation; consistent with the applicant’s internal policies, regulations, and procedures that apply uniformly toboth Federal awards and other activities of the applicant; and necessary and reasonable to accomplish the work properly and efficiently. We could not ascertain that these disbursements complied with program regulations. The Public Assistance Program is authorized under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency assistance Act, as Amended (Stafford Act). Assistance is provided so that communities can quickly respond to and recover from major disasters or emergencies declared by the President. The Municipality has approved grants for the Hurricane Irma and Maria disasters declared on September 2017 (disasters 3384EMPR, 4336 DRPR and 4339 DRPR). The program approves funding for debris removal, emergency protective measures, and the restoration of disaster-damaged, publicly owned facilities. It also encourages protection of damaged facilities from future incidents by providing assistance for hazard mitigation measures. Criteria: Uniform Guidance states in 2 CFR 200.403 that otherwise authorized by statue, costs must be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles, be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity and be adequately documented. As per 2 CFR 200.302 the other non-Federal entity’s financial management system must provide for the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. As per 44 CFR section 206.201 and 206.203, the public assistance program provides grant funding for emergency protective measures and debris removal (Emergency Work) and for permanent restoration of damaged facilities, including cost-effective hazard mitigation to protect facilities from future damage (Permanent Work) Cause: The Municipality applied inconsistent program procedures to the three disbursement transactions totaling $189,389 Effect: Remedies for noncompliance are described in 2 CFR 200.339. Grantor may impose additional conditions as described in 2 CRF 200.208 or take one or more of the actions listed on 2 CRF 200.339 as appropriate in the circumstances. Program regulations provide for recovery of assistance and penalty provisions on 44 CFR Part 206. Auditor’s recommendation: The Municipality must strengthen internal controls and procedures to assure that disbursement of program funds are properly documented, can be directly tied to the performance of eligible work, and is allowed under program regulations. Views of Responsible officials and corrective actions:
2023-005 – Inadequate Policies and Procedures (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210287, P031S210288, P031C200002, P031C210215 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: The College does not maintain written procedures as required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E of the Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide the following: Written procedures to implement the requirements of 200.305 Federal Payment. Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), Financial Management, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide the following: Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The College does not have written procedures for the federal program financial management requirements. Effect: Not having written procedures for the aforementioned puts the College in direct violation of Federal requirements over Federal programs under the Uniform Guidance, which could result in a loss of programs, funds and/or repayment of federal monies already awarded back to the Federal government. Questioned Costs: None Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College establish the required written procedures for federal monies and have them available to all personnel who work with federal programs.
2023-005 – Inadequate Policies and Procedures (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210287, P031S210288, P031C200002, P031C210215 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: The College does not maintain written procedures as required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E of the Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide the following: Written procedures to implement the requirements of 200.305 Federal Payment. Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), Financial Management, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide the following: Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The College does not have written procedures for the federal program financial management requirements. Effect: Not having written procedures for the aforementioned puts the College in direct violation of Federal requirements over Federal programs under the Uniform Guidance, which could result in a loss of programs, funds and/or repayment of federal monies already awarded back to the Federal government. Questioned Costs: None Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College establish the required written procedures for federal monies and have them available to all personnel who work with federal programs.
2023-005 – Inadequate Policies and Procedures (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210287, P031S210288, P031C200002, P031C210215 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: The College does not maintain written procedures as required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E of the Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide the following: Written procedures to implement the requirements of 200.305 Federal Payment. Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), Financial Management, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide the following: Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The College does not have written procedures for the federal program financial management requirements. Effect: Not having written procedures for the aforementioned puts the College in direct violation of Federal requirements over Federal programs under the Uniform Guidance, which could result in a loss of programs, funds and/or repayment of federal monies already awarded back to the Federal government. Questioned Costs: None Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College establish the required written procedures for federal monies and have them available to all personnel who work with federal programs.
2023-005 – Inadequate Policies and Procedures (Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance) Federal Program Information Federal Award Title and ALN: Research & Development Cluster, 84.031 Federal Awarding Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Award ID Number: P031S210287, P031S210288, P031C200002, P031C210215 Federal Award Year: 2023 Condition: The College does not maintain written procedures as required by 2 CFR 200, Subparts D and E of the Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), Financial Management, the financial management system of each non-federal entity must provide the following: Written procedures to implement the requirements of 200.305 Federal Payment. Per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7), Financial Management, the financial management system of each nonfederal entity must provide the following: Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The College does not have written procedures for the federal program financial management requirements. Effect: Not having written procedures for the aforementioned puts the College in direct violation of Federal requirements over Federal programs under the Uniform Guidance, which could result in a loss of programs, funds and/or repayment of federal monies already awarded back to the Federal government. Questioned Costs: None Auditor recommendation: We recommend the College establish the required written procedures for federal monies and have them available to all personnel who work with federal programs.
FINDING NO: 2023-018 STATE AGENCY: Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation ALN: 20.509 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Formula Grants for Rural Areas FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: OK-2017-023-05, OK-2018-023-03, OK-2019-025-03, OK-2020-021-02, OK- 2021-018-00, OK-2022-016-00, OK-2022-025-00, OK-2022-027-00, OK-2023-026-00 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles QUESTIONED COSTS: $0 Criteria: 2 CFR 1201.1 states, “Except as otherwise provided in this part, the Department of Transportation adopts the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200). This part supersedes and repeals the requirements of the Department of Transportation Common Rules (49 CFR part 18 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments and 49 CFR part 19 - Uniform Administrative Requirements - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Non-Profit Organizations), except that grants and cooperative agreements executed prior to December 26, 2014 shall continue to be subject to 49 CFR parts 18 and 19 as in effect on the date of such grants or agreements. New parts with terminology specific to the Department of Transportation follow.” 2 CFR 200.302 states in part, “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450.” 2 CFR 200.403 states, “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following criteria to be allowable under Federal awards: … (g) Be adequately documented.” 45 CFR §75.303 states in part, “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition and Context: The Office of Mobility and Public Transit (OMPT) at the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (Department) is responsible for the administration of various grants funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in accordance with the State Management Plan (SMP). OMPT charges eligible payroll costs to job pieces which are assigned by grant. Based on review of FTA administrative expenditures reported in SFY 2023, we noted that 100% of payroll expenses totaling $1,095,793.06 were reported and charged to job piece 2938830 which is associated with Assistance Listing (AL) # 20.509 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas. Consequently, payroll charges applicable to other FTA grants were not claimed under the appropriate AL Number. Cause: OMPT instructed staff to charge payroll related costs to job piece 2938830 and did not have a control process in place to ensure employees charged their time based on the actual grant worked on. Effect: An overstatement of expenditures reported under AL # 20.509 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas and an understatement of other grants funded by the FTA. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department strengthen internal controls to ensure payroll expenditures are charged to the appropriate grant. In addition, we recommend training be provided to staff to ensure that payroll charges are correctly distributed based on work performed. Views of Responsible Official(s) Contact Person: Eric Rose/Bobby Parkinson Anticipated Completion Date: 7/1/2025 Corrective Action Planned: The Oklahoma Department of Transportation agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report.
FINDING NO: 2023-018 STATE AGENCY: Oklahoma Department of Transportation FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Transportation ALN: 20.509 FEDERAL PROGRAM NAME: Formula Grants for Rural Areas FEDERAL AWARD NUMBER: OK-2017-023-05, OK-2018-023-03, OK-2019-025-03, OK-2020-021-02, OK- 2021-018-00, OK-2022-016-00, OK-2022-025-00, OK-2022-027-00, OK-2023-026-00 FEDERAL AWARD YEAR: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 CONTROL CATEGORY: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles QUESTIONED COSTS: $0 Criteria: 2 CFR 1201.1 states, “Except as otherwise provided in this part, the Department of Transportation adopts the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200). This part supersedes and repeals the requirements of the Department of Transportation Common Rules (49 CFR part 18 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments and 49 CFR part 19 - Uniform Administrative Requirements - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Non-Profit Organizations), except that grants and cooperative agreements executed prior to December 26, 2014 shall continue to be subject to 49 CFR parts 18 and 19 as in effect on the date of such grants or agreements. New parts with terminology specific to the Department of Transportation follow.” 2 CFR 200.302 states in part, “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450.” 2 CFR 200.403 states, “Except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following criteria to be allowable under Federal awards: … (g) Be adequately documented.” 45 CFR §75.303 states in part, “The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).” Condition and Context: The Office of Mobility and Public Transit (OMPT) at the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (Department) is responsible for the administration of various grants funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in accordance with the State Management Plan (SMP). OMPT charges eligible payroll costs to job pieces which are assigned by grant. Based on review of FTA administrative expenditures reported in SFY 2023, we noted that 100% of payroll expenses totaling $1,095,793.06 were reported and charged to job piece 2938830 which is associated with Assistance Listing (AL) # 20.509 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas. Consequently, payroll charges applicable to other FTA grants were not claimed under the appropriate AL Number. Cause: OMPT instructed staff to charge payroll related costs to job piece 2938830 and did not have a control process in place to ensure employees charged their time based on the actual grant worked on. Effect: An overstatement of expenditures reported under AL # 20.509 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas and an understatement of other grants funded by the FTA. Recommendation: We recommend that the Department strengthen internal controls to ensure payroll expenditures are charged to the appropriate grant. In addition, we recommend training be provided to staff to ensure that payroll charges are correctly distributed based on work performed. Views of Responsible Official(s) Contact Person: Eric Rose/Bobby Parkinson Anticipated Completion Date: 7/1/2025 Corrective Action Planned: The Oklahoma Department of Transportation agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit an annual data report to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period the School Corporation submitted two ESSER I reports, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of six reports. The annual data reports were prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed by a second knowledgeable individual; however, this process did not allow for the prevention, or detection and correction, of errors prior to submission. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, one of the six annual data reports was not supported by the School Corporation's records. For the ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, total expenses per the report were $688,778. However, the School Corporation's ledger had total expenses for the award, for that time period, of $784,638. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 OAK HILL UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the ESSER III, Year 2 report. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the ESSER III, Year 2 report was not supported by the School Corporation's records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. 19 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS OAK HILL UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are reported on the reports submitted on behalf of the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund program funds. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2023-003 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Number: 84.425U Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters Condition and Context The School Corporation had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls, which would include appropriate segregation of duties, that would likely be effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. The School Corporation was required to submit an annual data report to the Indiana Department of Education via JotForm, a form/report builder. Data to be submitted included, but was not limited to, current period expenditures, prior period expenditures, and expenditures per activity. During the audit period the School Corporation submitted two ESSER I reports, two ESSER II reports, and two ESSER III reports, for a total of six reports. The annual data reports were prepared by the Treasurer and reviewed by a second knowledgeable individual; however, this process did not allow for the prevention, or detection and correction, of errors prior to submission. Due to the lack of effective internal controls, one of the six annual data reports was not supported by the School Corporation's records. For the ESSER III, Year 2 report, which covered the period of July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, total expenses per the report were $688,778. However, the School Corporation's ledger had total expenses for the award, for that time period, of $784,638. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 18 OAK HILL UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were isolated to the ESSER III, Year 2 report. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." 34 CFR 76.731 states: "A State and a subgrantee shall keep records to show its compliance with program requirements." Cause A proper system of internal controls was not designed by management of the School Corporation. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the School Corporation's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As a result, the ESSER III, Year 2 report was not supported by the School Corporation's records. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in the loss of future federal funding to the School Corporation. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. 19 INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS OAK HILL UNITED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Recommendation We recommended that management of the School Corporation establish a proper system of internal controls and develop policies and procedures to ensure that all expenditures are reported on the reports submitted on behalf of the COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund program funds. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
Finding 2023-010 – Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance, Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Period of Performance Assistance Listing Program Title and Number- Disaster Grants- Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) 97.036 Federal Agency- Department of Homeland Security Pass-through Entity- N/A Award year: 2023 Criteria or specific requirement: Recipients must follow 2 CFR section 200.302 and the Public Assistance Program and Policy Guide which require documentation must be maintained for all costs claimed by the recipient regarding internal controls, allowable activities and eligible costs and recipients must incur such costs by the period of performance deadline of May 11, 2023. Condition: The City could not provide records related to the claimed costs within the force account labor and materials populations for the COVID-19 program portion of ALN 97.036. Cause: There has been turnover in grants department personnel and lack of policies and procedures to ensure the required level of documentation was maintained. Additionally, there was a change in general ledger systems during the fiscal year that attributed to a disconnect in the audit trail. Effect: The City can not demonstrate they complied with federal grant requirements over activities allowed or unallowed, allowable costs/cost principles and period of performance. Lack of support could result in actions taken by oversight agencies to claw back funding, or to reduce future funding. Context: The City could not provide support for 36 out of 40 force account labor selections, totaling $54,767 and $56,963, respectively. The City could not provide complete support for six out of 40 materials selections, totaling $53,421 and $186,993, respectively. Total Force Account Labor and Materials expenditures for this ALN were $1,840,561 out of the total expenditures of $4,208,353 reported on the SEFA. The samples were not statistically valid samples. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs totaling $108,188 based on 36 unsupported payroll items within a sample size of 40 and 6 unsupported invoices with a sample size of 40 in the Force Account labor and materials populations, respectively. Repeating Finding: No. Recommendation We recommend that the City develop processes and procedures to ensure proper tracking of force account labor at the employee level as well as maintain copies of all supporting invoices or other support for non-payroll expenditures as required. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
CASH MANAGEMENT - CASH DRAWS Repeat of finding 2022-003 Finding Type: Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance, Material Noncompliance ALN/CSFA and Program Title: 93.676 – Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Liberty Wilderness Crossroads Camp Contract Number: 90ZU0362 (direct), 90ZU0501 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.305(b) of the Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities “must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means.” Under 2 CFR 200.305(b)(5) of the Uniform Guidance, “To the extent available, the non-federal entity must disburse funds available from program income (including repayments to a revolving fund), rebates, refunds, contract settlements, audit recoveries, and interest earned on such funds before requesting additional cash payments.” Under 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) of the Uniform Guidance, the Organization’s financial management system must provide for “written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305.” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303(a) of the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The Organization drew cash down in excess of the total program disbursements during the year ended June 30, 2023, and requested additional cash draws prior to disbursing available funds for this program. Additionally, the Organization did not have written cash management policies and there was no process established for reviewing the pay requests prepared prior to submission. Cause: Policies and procedures were not in place to ensure that the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the Organization and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes was minimized. In addition, policies and procedures were not in place to ensure that additional cash draws were not requested prior to disbursing all available funds for program related purposes. Effect: Program funds were drawn in excess of disbursements. The Organization could be required to return the excess funds to the grantor along with any associated earned interest, until such time as the money is legitimately needed to pay for grant activities. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that written policies and procedures be established to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305, and recommend procedures be established for review of the cash draw requests prior to submission and that the review be documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See management’s response and Corrective Action Plan on page 57.
Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Foster Care Title IV-E Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.658 Compliance Requirements: Activities allowed or unallowed, Allowable costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiencies in Internal Control over Compliance Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2201CAFOST 2023 Criteria: According to 2 CFR, Part 200.302(b)(3), recipients of federal awards are responsible for maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition/Context: In connection with the Activities allowed or unallowed, and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements for the Foster Care Title IV-E grant we noted that management was unable to locate one approved invoices out of 40 items selected for test work. Cause: Due to turnover in the accounting department some accounting records became misplaced and current accounting staff could not locate these records. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to ensure expenses are being accurately supported and recorded could result in non-compliance with the grant requirements or unallowable costs being charged. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs were not identified. Identification as a Repeat Finding This finding is not a repeat finding. Auditor's Recommendation: We recommend that management implement policies, procedures, and controls to ensure supporting documentation over expenses is properly retained and expenses charged to Federal awards are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: Management understands the critical importance of maintaining proper documentation to ensure compliance with federal program requirements. To this end, the Organization will implement and reinforce a comprehensive system for retaining all invoices, payment records, and supporting documentation associated with federal awards. Additionally, the Organization will create and maintain a clear record retention policy. Invoice and Payment Documentation: • All invoices related to the federal program will be promptly reviewed and approved by the appropriate personnel to ensure they reflect allowable costs under the specific terms and conditions of the award. • Management will establish clear procedures for the proper recording and classification of payments, ensuring that they are linked directly to the corresponding federal program expenses. • All supporting documentation (e.g., purchase orders, contracts, receipts) will be retained in electronic formats within the accounting system, in accordance with the Organization’s record retention policy, ensuring availability for future audits or reviews. Retention and Accessibility: • The Organization will maintain a secure, organized filing system for all invoices and payments, ensuring that each record is easily accessible for audit purposes. This system will include electronic records that are stored in a centralized database, with restricted access to authorized personnel. • Retained invoices and payment documentation will be kept for the full duration required by federal regulations, typically for a period of at least seven years after the final expenditure report for the federal award has been submitted, or as otherwise required by the specific federal agency. Periodic Reviews and Monitoring: • To ensure ongoing compliance, Management will perform periodic reviews of federal program expenditures and documentation. This will include random sampling of invoices and payment records to confirm that they are complete, accurate, and in compliance with federal regulations. • In the event of any discrepancies or issues identified during these reviews, Management will take immediate corrective action to address the issue and prevent recurrence. By maintaining thorough records of all invoices and payments, the Organization aims to not only comply with federal audit requirements but also to ensure transparency, accountability, and sound financial management of federal funds.
2023-003 – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles: Written Financial Policies Federal Program Information: Department of Transportation - ALN: - 20.500, 20.507, 20.525 & 20.526 – Federal Transit Cluster 20.509 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program Criteria: The following CFR(s) apply to this finding: 2 CFR Section 200.302(b), Condition: The Committee has not formally adopted certain required written financial management policies as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations. Cause: The Committee was not aware of this requirement. Effect: Transactions could occur that did not comply with federal regulations. Identification of Questioned Costs: None identified. Context: The finding was based on requesting the Committee’s written financial policies related to federal compliance and therefore was not the result of a statistical sample. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The auditor recommends that the Committee obtain an understanding of the required written policies in the Code of Federal Regulations as applicable to its federal programs, create and formally adopt those required policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Please see the Corrective Action Plan issued by the Biddeford-Saco-Old Orchard Beach Transit Committee.
2023-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2022 - 05/31/2023 10CH010945-04 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2022 - 06/30/2023 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-03 COVID-19 Head Start U.S. Department of Health 04/01/2021 - 03/31/2024 10HE000845-01 and Human Services COVID-19 Early Head U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 Start Child Care and Human Services Partnerships 10HP000422-02-C3 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, property and equipment, grant revenue, and in-kind. During our tests of controls over bank reconciliations we also noted one individual is responsible for preparing the bank reconciliation, this individual also has the ability to post journal entries and there is no review of the completed bank reconciliation. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit and as there is a lack of segregation of duties within the bank reconciliation process, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.
2023-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2022 - 05/31/2023 10CH010945-04 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2022 - 06/30/2023 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-03 COVID-19 Head Start U.S. Department of Health 04/01/2021 - 03/31/2024 10HE000845-01 and Human Services COVID-19 Early Head U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 Start Child Care and Human Services Partnerships 10HP000422-02-C3 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, property and equipment, grant revenue, and in-kind. During our tests of controls over bank reconciliations we also noted one individual is responsible for preparing the bank reconciliation, this individual also has the ability to post journal entries and there is no review of the completed bank reconciliation. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit and as there is a lack of segregation of duties within the bank reconciliation process, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.
2023-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2022 - 05/31/2023 10CH010945-04 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2022 - 06/30/2023 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-03 COVID-19 Head Start U.S. Department of Health 04/01/2021 - 03/31/2024 10HE000845-01 and Human Services COVID-19 Early Head U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 Start Child Care and Human Services Partnerships 10HP000422-02-C3 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, property and equipment, grant revenue, and in-kind. During our tests of controls over bank reconciliations we also noted one individual is responsible for preparing the bank reconciliation, this individual also has the ability to post journal entries and there is no review of the completed bank reconciliation. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit and as there is a lack of segregation of duties within the bank reconciliation process, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.
2023-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2022 - 05/31/2023 10CH010945-04 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2022 - 06/30/2023 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-03 COVID-19 Head Start U.S. Department of Health 04/01/2021 - 03/31/2024 10HE000845-01 and Human Services COVID-19 Early Head U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2021 - 06/30/2022 Start Child Care and Human Services Partnerships 10HP000422-02-C3 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, property and equipment, grant revenue, and in-kind. During our tests of controls over bank reconciliations we also noted one individual is responsible for preparing the bank reconciliation, this individual also has the ability to post journal entries and there is no review of the completed bank reconciliation. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit and as there is a lack of segregation of duties within the bank reconciliation process, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.
Federal Agency: US Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants ALN Number: 14.228 Award Periods: April 1, 2022 March 31, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance also reported as Other Noncompliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Subpart D 200.302 (1) and 200.303 (a) stipulates that the auditee must identify, in its accounts, all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal programs and award identification shall include, as applicable, the ALN title and number, Federal award identification number and year, name of Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity; establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulation, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Controller General of the United States and the Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee on Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In addition, 2 CFR 200.502(b) states that since the Federal Government is at risk for loans until the debt is repaid, the following guidelines must be used to calculate the value of Federal awards expended under loan programs, except as noted in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section: (1) Value of new loans made or received during the audit period; plus (2) Beginning of the audit period balance of loans from previous years for which the Federal Government imposes continuing compliance requirements; plus (3) Any interest subsidy, cash, or administrative cost allowance received. Condition: The Authoritys schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) did not report loan balances on the SEFA as required by Uniform Guidance for federal program 14.228. Questioned costs: Not able to determine. Context: The Agency did not report loan balances on the SEFA. Cause: The Agency was not aware of the requirements to include loan balances on the SEFA. Effect: The SEFA omitted loan balances for federal program 14.228. Therefore, it was not in compliance with 2 CFR Subpart D 200.302 (1), 200.303 (a) and 200.502 (b). The Agencys program expenditures may be disallowed if the expenditures are not reported correctly on the SEFA. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency review current procedures for creating the SEFA to ensure that it is accurately reporting loan balances and expenditures during the year under audit for all federal programs to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Cash Management Public Housing Capital Fund - AL No. 14.872 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Other Matter to Reported Under the Uniform Control Condition: It was noted that funds were overdrawn during the year and never paid out to a vendor. Out of the 26 grant drawdowns during the year, 11 samples were tested and the following was noted: 6 drawdowns were missing invoice documentation. 4 drawdowns were missing payment documentation. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 11 grant drawdowns from the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the drawdowns and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements. Criteria: The U.S. Treasury per 2 CFR section 200.305 (2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) requires grant funds received by the Authority to be properly spent within 72 hours of receipt. HUD regulations require that proper documentation be maintained for all Capital Fund Program per 24 CFR 905.326. Cause: The Authority experienced staff turnover in the finance department as well as difficulty replacing personnel knowledgeable with HUD and grant reporting requirements. Effect: The Authority is unable to provide supporting documentation for the capital funds that were drawn during the year. Questioned Costs: $155,318 Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over grant reporting and provide training opportunities to staff. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name: Assistance Listing Number 66.458, Environmental Protection Agency. Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 5749-01, Loan Period 06/18/2022-11/15/2024 Pass-through Entity: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy Finance Division - Water Infrastructure Financing Section Type: Material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding: No Criteria: As a precondition to receive federal awards, prospective recipients must have effective internal controls over the federal award. As described in 2 CFR, Part 200.303, nonfederal entities must have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal awards. Such policies should include procedures for collecting payments of federal funds per 2 CRF 200.305, cash management (i.e., minimizing the time between draws and actual disbursing of federal awards) per 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6), allowable cost per 2 CFR 200.403, and conflict of interest per 2 CFR 200.318. Per 2 CFR 200.319 (d), the non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: The Township did not have written procedures for cash management, allowable cost or conflict of interest. In addition, the Township procurement policy did not include all necessary items specified in the Uniform Guidance. Identification of How Likely Questioned Costs Were Computed: N/A Known Questioned Costs: None Context: N/A Cause/Effect: The Township was not aware that they were required to have written policies and procedures for the items noted above and was using the grant agreement requirements for guidelines. The Township's controls were not adequate to ensure it followed the federal requirement over these processes. Recommendation: We recommend the Township adopt written policies and procedures over cash management, allowable costs, and conflicts of interest. In addition, we recommend that management review and modify the procedure policy to include all the necessary items outline in the Uniform Guidance. View of responsible officials and planned corrective action plan: See attached corrective action plan.
Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Consolidated Health Centers Cluster: Community Health Centers; COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Act Funding for Health Centers Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria: The 2 CFR Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards present accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program. The entity is required to maintain records, supported by source documentation, that identify adequately the source of funds for federally funded programs. Condition/Context: For 1 of the Center’s 92 expense reimbursement request draw-downs for the year ended March 31, 2023, the reimbursement request included more expenses than the amount of respective expenses incurred. Cause: During the year, the Center experienced turnover within the finance department and expense reimbursement requests were inadvertently completed incorrectly using incorrect allocations percentages and information. Effect: As a result of the incorrect expense reimbursements, the Center received reimbursement payments in excess of related expenses incurred totaling $199,099 for the year ended March 31, 2023. Questioned Costs: $199,099 Recommendation: The Center should implement a more robust process and related internal controls surrounding the expense reimbursement requests to ensure that the submitted requests agree to the respective costs incurred and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Due to extenuating circumstances, including turnover in the finance department, the reimbursement requests were not properly reviewed and agreed to supporting documentation. However, although the expense reimbursement requests exceeded the respective incurred expenses in the identified requests above, the Center consistently incurs allowable expenses that qualify to be reimbursed in excess of total grant payments received and is working to remediate the issue. Planned Implementation of Corrective Action: Additional preventative internal control procedures will be implemented, including and additional level of review of the reimbursement request prior to submission. These procedures and internal controls have been implemented as of the date of this report. Person responsible for Corrective Action: Chief Executive Officer.
Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Consolidated Health Centers Cluster: Community Health Centers; COVID-19 American Rescue Plan Act Funding for Health Centers Finding Type: Significant Deficiency Criteria: The 2 CFR Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards present accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program. The entity is required to maintain records, supported by source documentation, that identify adequately the source of funds for federally funded programs. Condition/Context: For 1 of the Center’s 92 expense reimbursement request draw-downs for the year ended March 31, 2023, the reimbursement request included more expenses than the amount of respective expenses incurred. Cause: During the year, the Center experienced turnover within the finance department and expense reimbursement requests were inadvertently completed incorrectly using incorrect allocations percentages and information. Effect: As a result of the incorrect expense reimbursements, the Center received reimbursement payments in excess of related expenses incurred totaling $199,099 for the year ended March 31, 2023. Questioned Costs: $199,099 Recommendation: The Center should implement a more robust process and related internal controls surrounding the expense reimbursement requests to ensure that the submitted requests agree to the respective costs incurred and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: Due to extenuating circumstances, including turnover in the finance department, the reimbursement requests were not properly reviewed and agreed to supporting documentation. However, although the expense reimbursement requests exceeded the respective incurred expenses in the identified requests above, the Center consistently incurs allowable expenses that qualify to be reimbursed in excess of total grant payments received and is working to remediate the issue. Planned Implementation of Corrective Action: Additional preventative internal control procedures will be implemented, including and additional level of review of the reimbursement request prior to submission. These procedures and internal controls have been implemented as of the date of this report. Person responsible for Corrective Action: Chief Executive Officer.