U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.686 Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 4 out of 4 selections, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.686 Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: No Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. For 1 out of 1 selection, we noted that the Federal Financial Report was not submitted timely. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Additionally, the grant agreement requires the Federal Financial Report to be submitted no later than 90 days after the period of performance end date through recipient online accounts in the Payment Management System. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Additionally, there should be a process to ensure all reports are submitted timely. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-017 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the expenditure report to the state to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-017 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the expenditure report to the state to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-017 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the expenditure report to the state to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-017 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the expenditure report to the state to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-017 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the expenditure report to the state to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.767 Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-017 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported in the expenditure report to the state to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-019 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported on the Medical Assistance Transportation report, the Maryland Children Health Program (MCHP) - Eligibility report and the Administrative Care Coordination (ACC) report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with report management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-019 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported on the Medical Assistance Transportation report, the Maryland Children Health Program (MCHP) - Eligibility report and the Administrative Care Coordination (ACC) report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with report management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-019 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported on the Medical Assistance Transportation report, the Maryland Children Health Program (MCHP) - Eligibility report and the Administrative Care Coordination (ACC) report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with report management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-019 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported on the Medical Assistance Transportation report, the Maryland Children Health Program (MCHP) - Eligibility report and the Administrative Care Coordination (ACC) report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with report management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.778 Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-019 Condition: For 3 out of 3 selections, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amounts reported on the Medical Assistance Transportation report, the Maryland Children Health Program (MCHP) - Eligibility report and the Administrative Care Coordination (ACC) report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the general ledger. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with report management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2020-020 Condition: For 2 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 2 out of 2 selections, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency did not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2020-020 Condition: For 2 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 2 out of 2 selections, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency did not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2020-020 Condition: For 2 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 2 out of 2 selections, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency did not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2020-020 Condition: For 2 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 2 out of 2 selections, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency did not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.914 HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2020-020 Condition: For 2 out of 2 selections, the drawdown request forms did not have the approval of the Grant Service Director. For 2 out of 2 selections, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency did not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-021 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-021 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-021 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-021 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-021 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-021 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Cash Management Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-021 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the drawdown amount to the general ledger to ensure funds were being expended prior to requesting for reimbursement. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.303: Internal Control, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. According to AM 413-60, Grant Documentation, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director conducts ongoing monitoring and control of all reimbursement receipts and deposits until grant ends; as well as all program and sub-recipient (when applicable) documentation, to include: (1) program documentation; (2) timesheets; (3) deliverables; (4) activities; (5) vendor payments; (6) program data/charts/numbers; and (7) financial and compliance report. According to AM 413-61, Grant Management Financial Reporting, Grant Manager/Program Manager/Director maintains all documentation, either electronic or hard copy, for all Federally funded grants for the term of the grant for a minimum of seven years for review and audit by the granting agency or its designee. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information presented in the expenditure report to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for generating reports and there was no documentation of the reconciling differences. Effect: The City may not be in compliance with the cash management requirements in accordance with Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with cash management requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services AL No. 93.940 HIV Prevention Activities Health Department Based Material Weakness in Internal Controls and Noncompliance over Reporting Repeat Finding: Yes; 2022-023 Condition: For 1 out of 1 selection, we were unable to agree the expenditure details from the general ledger to the amount reported in the Federal Financial Report to ensure completeness, accuracy and compliance with the required accounting basis. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR §200.303, The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302: Financial management. (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state’s own funds. In addition, the state’s and the other non-Federal entity’s financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: The agency could not reconcile information reported in the expenditure report to the state to the underlying records. Finance and the agency use different parameters for running reports and neither department reconciled the other reporting completed. Effect: Expenditures reported to the Federal government could be inaccurate. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend the City establish and implement a process to reconcile reports used by the various departments for external reporting to the City’s internal records to validate compliance with reporting requirements. Auditee Response and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the corrective action plan on current findings in Part V of this report. Auditor’s Conclusion: Finding remains as stated.
Condition: The Organization’s written policies and procedures related to financial management and procurement do not meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200, Subpart D and Subpart E. Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.302.b and 2 CFR Section 200.305 of the Uniform Guidance, the Organization is required to have a written financial management policy. Additionally, according to 2 CFR Section 200.317 – 200.326, the Organization is required to have a written procurement policy. Cause: The Organization was unaware of requirements regarding policies and procedures outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Written policies necessary for non-Federal entities receiving federal funds were not in place. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None reported Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update their written policies and procedures that meet the requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the auditor’s finding and will update the Organization’s written policies and procedures for the Uniform Guidance requirements.
Condition: The Organization’s written policies and procedures related to financial management and procurement do not meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200, Subpart D and Subpart E. Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.302.b and 2 CFR Section 200.305 of the Uniform Guidance, the Organization is required to have a written financial management policy. Additionally, according to 2 CFR Section 200.317 – 200.326, the Organization is required to have a written procurement policy. Cause: The Organization was unaware of requirements regarding policies and procedures outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Written policies necessary for non-Federal entities receiving federal funds were not in place. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None reported Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update their written policies and procedures that meet the requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the auditor’s finding and will update the Organization’s written policies and procedures for the Uniform Guidance requirements.
Condition: The Organization’s written policies and procedures related to financial management and procurement do not meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200, Subpart D and Subpart E. Criteria: According to 2 CFR Section 200.302.b and 2 CFR Section 200.305 of the Uniform Guidance, the Organization is required to have a written financial management policy. Additionally, according to 2 CFR Section 200.317 – 200.326, the Organization is required to have a written procurement policy. Cause: The Organization was unaware of requirements regarding policies and procedures outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Written policies necessary for non-Federal entities receiving federal funds were not in place. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None reported Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization update their written policies and procedures that meet the requirements of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the auditor’s finding and will update the Organization’s written policies and procedures for the Uniform Guidance requirements.
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2022-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last two fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2022-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last two fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2022-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last two fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2022-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last two fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
CONDITION: The District did not properly record its federal program expenditures for the ESSER and ARP ESER federal grant programs using the various funding source expenditure codes as prescribed by the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. This is a repeat finding from (2022-003) from the previous fiscal year. CRITERIA: The financial management system of the District must provide for 1) identification in it’s accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received, and 2) accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in sections 200.328 and 200.329 of the Uniform Guidance. EFFECT: The District was not in compliance with the financial reporting requirements in the Chart of Accounts for PA Local Educational Agencies maintained by the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations and well as Section 2 CFR 200.302(a) of the Uniform Guidance. CAUSE: The District experienced turnover in key business office personnel during the last two fiscal years, which resulted in errors in posting federal expenditures to the appropriate general ledger account codes. This further lead to inaccurate reporting as outlined above. QUESTIONED COST: None RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the District properly follow the guidance contained within the PA Office of the Budget, Office of Comptroller Operations Chart of Accounts for recording all expenditures of the District, most specifically, federal program grant expenditures to 1) enhance internal controls for tracking and monitoring federal program expenditures and 2) comply with the recordkeeping requirements for federal funds as specified in 2 CFR Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance and PDE regulations. VIEW OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See Correction Action Plan
Finding 2023-006 Information on the federal program: Subject: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) – Internal Controls Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: COVID-19 – Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D200013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: 2 CFR section 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 Financial reporting . . . . 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." Condition: An effective internal control system was not in place at the School Corporation in order to ensure compliance with requirements related to the grant agreement and the reporting compliance requirements. Cause: The School Corporation's management had not developed a system of internal controls to ensure compliance with the compliance requirements listed above. Management misinterpreted the instructions for the reporting requirements and believed that they did not need to fill in the expense information as an LEA. Effect: The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the School Corporation at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the compliance requirements. A lack of segregation of duties within an internal control system could have also allowed noncompliance with the compliance requirements and allowed the misuse and mismanagement of federal funds and assets by not having proper oversight, reviews, and approvals over the activities of the programs. Questioned Costs: There were no questioned costs identified. Context: The School Corporation was required to submit one Annual Data Report for each year in the audit period to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE) to meet federal reporting requirements for ESSER grant awards. Amounts reported on each ESSER I Annual Data Report did not agree to underlying detail for the ESSER I grant. ESSER I was overstated on the Year 3 report by $76,231. The finding is isolated to the S425D200013 award (ESSER I). Identification as a repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend someone other than the preparer of the report perform a documented review prior to submission to validate the accuracy and completeness of the data submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has prepared a corrective action plan.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The District’s internal controls over budgeting for federal grants are insufficient to ensure compliance with federal regulations and to stay within the budgetary limits established by the federal awards, as specified in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS), administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Specifically, the District has not adequately adhered to budgeting restraints outlined for its federal grants. Our audit procedures identified the following instances where actual expenditures appear to exceed the budgeted amounts: • Twelve-line items in the Title I grants, totaling $104,453.87. • Seven-line items in the ARP ESSER grant, totaling $259,335.59. • Two-line items in the Special Education IDEA Part B grant, totaling $6,499.58. Context/ Perspective: This finding is a result of our budget to actual comparisons for federal grant purposes of major programs and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Cause: The District did not properly monitor budget limits established in MCAPS to ensure that budgeting requirements were fulfilled. Effect: Failure to remain within established budget limits in MCAPS could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: $370,289.04 Recommendation: The District should establish additional internal controls to ensure that it remains within budget limits for each grant maintained in MCAPS. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The District’s internal controls over budgeting for federal grants are insufficient to ensure compliance with federal regulations and to stay within the budgetary limits established by the federal awards, as specified in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS), administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Specifically, the District has not adequately adhered to budgeting restraints outlined for its federal grants. Our audit procedures identified the following instances where actual expenditures appear to exceed the budgeted amounts: • Twelve-line items in the Title I grants, totaling $104,453.87. • Seven-line items in the ARP ESSER grant, totaling $259,335.59. • Two-line items in the Special Education IDEA Part B grant, totaling $6,499.58. Context/ Perspective: This finding is a result of our budget to actual comparisons for federal grant purposes of major programs and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Cause: The District did not properly monitor budget limits established in MCAPS to ensure that budgeting requirements were fulfilled. Effect: Failure to remain within established budget limits in MCAPS could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: $370,289.04 Recommendation: The District should establish additional internal controls to ensure that it remains within budget limits for each grant maintained in MCAPS. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The District’s internal controls over budgeting for federal grants are insufficient to ensure compliance with federal regulations and to stay within the budgetary limits established by the federal awards, as specified in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS), administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Specifically, the District has not adequately adhered to budgeting restraints outlined for its federal grants. Our audit procedures identified the following instances where actual expenditures appear to exceed the budgeted amounts: • Twelve-line items in the Title I grants, totaling $104,453.87. • Seven-line items in the ARP ESSER grant, totaling $259,335.59. • Two-line items in the Special Education IDEA Part B grant, totaling $6,499.58. Context/ Perspective: This finding is a result of our budget to actual comparisons for federal grant purposes of major programs and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Cause: The District did not properly monitor budget limits established in MCAPS to ensure that budgeting requirements were fulfilled. Effect: Failure to remain within established budget limits in MCAPS could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: $370,289.04 Recommendation: The District should establish additional internal controls to ensure that it remains within budget limits for each grant maintained in MCAPS. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: As part of our audit procedures over expenditures, we observed approximately ten instances where the required supporting documentation to support an expenditure was missing or unavailable. Furthermore, we observed one instance where an expenditure was incorrectly charged to a function and object code, was not budgeted for in related grant budget. Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of forty cash disbursements totaling $890,529 charged to major programs for single audit purposes and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Questioned Costs: Projected Questioned Costs: $1,323,439.41 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $441,065.61 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $1,526.67 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Questioned Cost of Sampled Items: $35,425.09 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $11,325.72 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $7.33 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. We also recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that expenditures are charged to the appropriate budget categories in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS) of the District which is administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: As part of our audit procedures over expenditures, we observed approximately ten instances where the required supporting documentation to support an expenditure was missing or unavailable. Furthermore, we observed one instance where an expenditure was incorrectly charged to a function and object code, was not budgeted for in related grant budget. Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of forty cash disbursements totaling $890,529 charged to major programs for single audit purposes and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Questioned Costs: Projected Questioned Costs: $1,323,439.41 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $441,065.61 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $1,526.67 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Questioned Cost of Sampled Items: $35,425.09 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $11,325.72 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $7.33 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. We also recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that expenditures are charged to the appropriate budget categories in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS) of the District which is administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: As part of our audit procedures over expenditures, we observed approximately ten instances where the required supporting documentation to support an expenditure was missing or unavailable. Furthermore, we observed one instance where an expenditure was incorrectly charged to a function and object code, was not budgeted for in related grant budget. Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of forty cash disbursements totaling $890,529 charged to major programs for single audit purposes and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Questioned Costs: Projected Questioned Costs: $1,323,439.41 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $441,065.61 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $1,526.67 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Questioned Cost of Sampled Items: $35,425.09 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $11,325.72 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $7.33 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. We also recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that expenditures are charged to the appropriate budget categories in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS) of the District which is administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: As part of our audit procedures over expenditures, we observed approximately ten instances where the required supporting documentation to support an expenditure was missing or unavailable. Furthermore, we observed one instance where an expenditure was incorrectly charged to a function and object code, was not budgeted for in related grant budget. Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of forty cash disbursements totaling $890,529 charged to major programs for single audit purposes and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Questioned Costs: Projected Questioned Costs: $1,323,439.41 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $441,065.61 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $1,526.67 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Questioned Cost of Sampled Items: $35,425.09 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $11,325.72 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $7.33 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. We also recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that expenditures are charged to the appropriate budget categories in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS) of the District which is administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: The District’s internal controls over budgeting for federal grants are insufficient to ensure compliance with federal regulations and to stay within the budgetary limits established by the federal awards, as specified in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS), administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Specifically, the District has not adequately adhered to budgeting restraints outlined for its federal grants. Our audit procedures identified the following instances where actual expenditures appear to exceed the budgeted amounts: • Twelve-line items in the Title I grants, totaling $104,453.87. • Seven-line items in the ARP ESSER grant, totaling $259,335.59. • Two-line items in the Special Education IDEA Part B grant, totaling $6,499.58. Context/ Perspective: This finding is a result of our budget to actual comparisons for federal grant purposes of major programs and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Cause: The District did not properly monitor budget limits established in MCAPS to ensure that budgeting requirements were fulfilled. Effect: Failure to remain within established budget limits in MCAPS could affect future eligibility for federal award programs or result in a loss or misappropriation of public assets. Questioned Costs: $370,289.04 Recommendation: The District should establish additional internal controls to ensure that it remains within budget limits for each grant maintained in MCAPS. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.
Material Weakness Material Noncompliance Program: Assistance Listing 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A of the ESEA) Assistance Listing: 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Assistance Listing: 84.425D – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund Assistance Listing 84.425U – American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Repeat Finding: No Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that a non-federal entity’s financial management system must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions. This section further requires the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award. 2 CFR 200.303 requires that a non-federal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over a federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: As part of our audit procedures over expenditures, we observed approximately ten instances where the required supporting documentation to support an expenditure was missing or unavailable. Furthermore, we observed one instance where an expenditure was incorrectly charged to a function and object code, was not budgeted for in related grant budget. Context/ Perspective: This finding is based on our statistically valid random sample of forty cash disbursements totaling $890,529 charged to major programs for single audit purposes and the conditions cited appear to be a systematic issue. Questioned Costs: Projected Questioned Costs: $1,323,439.41 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $441,065.61 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $1,526.67 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Questioned Cost of Sampled Items: $35,425.09 - 84.425D/U – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief $11,325.72 - 84.027/84.173 – Special Education Cluster (IDEA) $7.33 - 84.010A - Title I Grants To Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part of the ESEA) Recommendation: We recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that proper records are maintained to document its expenditures charged to federal grant programs. We also recommend that the District implement additional internal controls as necessary to ensure that expenditures are charged to the appropriate budget categories in the Mississippi Comprehensive Automated Performance-based System (MCAPS) of the District which is administered through the Mississippi Department of Education. Views of Responsible Officials: The Auditee’s Corrective Action Plan on pages 99-100 lists the District’s response to the findings.