Findings Citing § 200.302

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-037 (See Finding Reference Number 2024-015) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 10.566) NUTRITION ASSISTANCE FOR PUERTO RICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AWARD NUMBERS 231PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 through – 9/30/2023); 241PR426S7003/4 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2023 through – 9/30/2024) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE – MATERIAL WEAKNESS AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302, Financial Management, establishes that (a) each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. In section (b), the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): … (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The 2 CFR §200.303 (a) establishes that the recipient and subrecipient must: establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance for reporting requirements, we selected two reports that closed during our fiscal year audit. With respect with the Grant Award 231PR426S7003/4 and 241PR426S7003/4 we noted the following deficiencies: 1) The PRDF was unable to provide supporting documentation for the administrative expenditures that reconcile the figures reported with the PRIFAS accounting system. 2) In addition, for all the Federal awards mentioned above, based on internal control interviews, we found that there is no designated individual responsible for independently reviewing the reports prior to submission to ensure accuracy and consistency with source data. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to Federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statement and SEFA. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the Federal awarding agency. STATEMENT OF CAUSE During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the required reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the Federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING This is a repeat of a finding reported in the prior audit as Finding Numbers is 2023-020/2023-049. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend ADSEF establish written internal controls and specific procedures to ensure that all reported amounts are fully supported and reconciled with the PRIFAS accounting system and to assign responsibility to a designated official to review and approve all reports prior to submission to the Federal agency. Implement internal controls to maintain adequate documentation supporting all financial data reported.

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-040 FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2022G996117 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2021 – 9/30/2022) 2023G996117 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – SPECIAL REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE – MATERIAL WEAKNESS AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA In accordance with 45 CFR, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Part 265.7, each State's quarterly reports (the TANF Data Report, the TANF Financial Report (or Territorial Financial Report), the SSP-MOE Data Report, and the Work Outcomes of TANF Exciters Report) must be complete and accurate and filed by the due date. (d) For the TANF Financial Report (or, as applicable, the Territorial Financial Report), “a complete and accurate report” means that: (1) The reported data accurately reflects information available to the State in case records, financial records, and automated data systems; (2) The data are free from computational errors and are internally consistent (e.g., items that should add to totals do so); (3) The State reports data on all applicable elements; and (4) All expenditures have been made in accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(a). (f) We will review the data filed in the quarterly reports to determine if they meet these standards. In addition, we will use audits and reviews to verify the accuracy of the data filed by the States. In addition, 2 CFR § 200.302(a) establishes that each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. Financial management systems must be sufficient to permit the preparation of required reports and ensure tracking of expenditures so that funds can be properly reconciled and reported in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and award terms. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our procedures for understanding the preparation and reconciliation of TANF financial and programmatic reports, we compared the Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) expenditures reported in the ACF-204 Annual Report with the amounts reported in the ACF-196TR TANF Financial Report for the same fiscal year. Our review identified that the MOE expenditures reported in the ACF-204 do not reconcile with the corresponding amounts reported in the ACF-196TR. Specifically, the totals reported in both reports contained differences that were not supported by documented reconciliation procedures. In addition, ADSEF did not provide evidence of a formal reconciliation process or supporting documentation demonstrating that the differences between both reports were identified, analyzed, and resolved prior to submission. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systemic internal control deficiency over the reconciliation and validation of Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) expenditures reported in Federal TANF reporting processes. The deficiency is considered systemic because ADSEF did not demonstrate that adequate controls were in place to ensure consistent reconciliation between the ACF-204 Annual Report and the ACF-196-TR Financial Report prior to submission. In addition, the lack of formalized procedures and effective oversight over the preparation and validation of Federal reports indicates a broader weakness in the internal control structure governing financial and programmatic reporting. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF did not establish and implement written policies and procedures governing the reconciliation, preparation, and validation of Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) expenditures reported in the ACF-204 Annual Report and the ACF-196TR TANF Financial Report. In addition, management did not implement adequate internal controls to ensure that reported amounts between both reports were reviewed, reconciled, and verified for consistency prior to submission. Furthermore, there was insufficient monitoring to ensure that financial and programmatic reporting data were properly compared and validated against supporting financial records, resulting in discrepancies between the reports not being identified or corrected opportunely. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT As a result of the condition, the Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) expenditures reported in the ACF-204 Annual Report and the ACF-196TR TANF Financial Report are not reliable or fully reconcilable, which may affect the accuracy and integrity of federal reporting. This condition increases the risk that reported financial information may be misstated and that inconsistencies between required federal reports may not be detected in a timely manner. In addition, the lack of reconciliation between reports may result in noncompliance with federal reporting requirements and could lead to questions regarding the accuracy and allowability of reported MOE expenditures. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING No reported as prior audit finding. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend should establish formal procedures to ensure the reconciliation, review, and validation of Maintenance-of-Effort (MOE) expenditures reported in the ACF-204 and ACF-196-TR prior to submission. These procedures should ensure that reported amounts are consistent with supporting financial records. In addition, ADSEF should strengthen internal controls to ensure proper supervisory review and monitoring of Federal reporting to prevent and detect discrepancies between required reports.

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-041 FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.568) LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2301PRLIEA (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2024) 2401PRLIEA (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2023 – 9/30/2025) 2301PRLIEE (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2024) 2301PRLIEI (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2024) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – PERFORMANCE TYPE OF FINDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE – MATERIAL WEAKNESS AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. (See § 200.450.) (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. LlHEAP Performance Data Form (OMB No 0970-0449) – State grant recipients must submit this report by January 3lst regarding the prior Federal fiscal year. The first section of the report is the Grant recipient Survey that collects and reports data on sources and uses of LIHEAP funds. The Grant recipient Survey includes Section III: Estimated Sources of Funds and Section IV: Estimated Use of LIHEAP Funds. Note: that these are referencing obligated not expended funding. The rest of the report is regarding performance metrics, mostly related to home energy burden targeting and reduction, as well as the continuity of home energy service. The Grantee Survey obligation amounts should be compared with the Carryover and Reallotment and FFR-425 reports. This reconciliation is needed to make sure the obligated balances for the program year being tested are accurate. Annual Report on Households Assisted by LIHEAP (OMB No. 0970-0060) https://omb.report/icr/202211-0970-005 – As part of the application for block grant funds each year, a report is required for the preceding fiscal year of (1) the number and income levels of the households assisted for each component and any type of LHEAP assistance (heating, cooling, crisis, and weatherization); and (2) the number of households served that contained young children, elderly, or persons with disabilities, or any vulnerable household for each component. Quarterly Performance and Management Report (OMB No. 0970-0589) https://omb.report/icr/202205-0970-017/doc/121847100 – Grant recipients must submit data and information about LIHEAP during the current FY, including success, challenges, needs and innovations. The quarterly reports focus on assisted households, performance management, obligation of funding, changes made due to anticipated increase in energy bills, collaboration with other utility programs, training and technical assistance needs. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over the financial reporting requirements for LIHEAP program, we selected three reports submitted during our fiscal year. We noted that the administrative expenditures do not reconcile with the accounting information from PRIFAS. In addition, there are no written procedures describing internal controls over this requirement. We requested the LIHEAP Performance Data (OMB No 0970-0449), but no evidence of the report was provided. We obtained a copy of the Annual Report on Households Assisted by LlHEAP (OMB No. 0970-0060), but no supporting documentation regarding the information reported was provided. We requested two quarterly reports for the Quarterly Performance and Management Report (OMB No. 0970-0589) for the 2301LIEA grant, but no documentation was provided. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statements and SEFA. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the Federal awarding agency. In relation to Special and Performance Reports, there are no proper controls over the data reported and the supporting information. STATEMENT OF CAUSE During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the SF– 425 reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. ADSEF lacks internal controls that allow for the timely validation and reconciliation of financial information. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the Federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. In relation to the Special and Performance Reports, the lack of written procedures and proper safeguarding of documentation does not allow for demonstrating compliance with the requirements of these reports. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. We were unable to evaluate internal controls and compliance over the Special and Performance Reports. ADSEF might not comply with the requirements of the program and not report it on time to the regulatory agencies. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING This is a repeat of a finding reported in the prior audit as Finding Numbers 2023-021/2023-051. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend ADSEF to establish written procedures and internal controls manuals to provide and document the segregation of duties related to the reporting compliance requirement. In addition, in relation to the Special and Performance Reports create internal controls that provide for obtaining information, preparing reports, and filing evidence of reports.

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-042 FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2022G996117 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2021 – 9/30/2022) 2023G996117 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – PERFORMANCE TYPE OF FINDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE – MATERIAL WEAKNESS AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA In accordance with 45 CFR, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Part 265.7, states that: (a) Each State's quarterly reports [the TANF Data Report, the TANF Financial Report (or Territorial Financial Report), the SSP-MOE Data Report, and the Work Outcomes of TANF Exciters Report] must be complete and accurate and filed by the due date. (b) For a disaggregated data report, “a complete and accurate report” means that: (1) The reported data accurately reflects information available to the State in case records, financial records, and automated data systems, and includes correction of the quarterly data by the end of the fiscal year reporting period; (2) The data are free from computational errors and are internally consistent (e.g., items that should add to totals do so); (3) The State reports data for all required elements (i.e., no data is missing); (4) (i) The State provides data on all families; or (ii) If the State opts to use sampling, the State reports data on all families selected in a sample that meets the specification and procedures in the TANF Sampling Manual (except for families listed in error); and (5) Where estimates are necessary (e.g., some types of assistance may require cost estimates), the State uses reasonable methods to develop these estimates. (c) For an aggregated data report, “a complete and accurate report” means that: (1) The reported data accurately reflects information available to the State in case records, financial records, and automated data systems; (2) The data are free from computational errors and are internally consistent (e.g., items that should add to totals do so); (3) The State reports data on all applicable elements; and (4) Monthly totals are unduplicated counts for all families (e.g., the number of families and the number of out-of-wedlock births are unduplicated counts). In addition, 2 CFR § 200.302 (a) establishes that each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. In section (b) the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our procedures for understanding internal controls for the preparation of ACF-199 reports, we request a procedures manual on how these reports are processed and the personnel responsible for each process. ADSEF did not provide us with a manual describing the data collection process, how the information provided by the regions is validated, and the individuals responsible for submitting the reports. Also, they should have completed the ACF-209 report for the quarters of December 2023 and June 2024 and no evidence was provided. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systemic deficiency. Following the sample selection, ADSEF failed to demonstrate a control structure, as it was unable to provide a formal procedures manual for the reporting process. The sampling was a statistically valid sample. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADSEF did not establish and implement written policies and procedures governing the preparation, review, validation, and submission of TANF reports. In addition, management did not implement adequate monitoring controls to ensure that required reports were prepared, reviewed, and submitted timely in accordance with Federal requirements. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT As a result, ADSEF was unable to demonstrate that adequate controls existed to ensure the completeness, accuracy, and timeliness of TANF reporting. This condition resulted in the failure to submit the required ACF-209 reports for the quarters ended December 31, 2023, and June 30, 2024, and increases the risk that Federal reports may contain incomplete or inaccurate information, thereby affecting Federal oversight and decision-making. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING This is a repeat of a finding reported in the prior audit as Finding Number is 2023-052. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that management establish internal control procedures manuals that clearly outline the processes to be followed for data collection, recording, and reporting. Additionally, standardize the way documents related to participant files are filed.

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-044 (See Finding Reference Number 2024-016) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.556) MARYLEE ALLEN PROMOTING SAFE AND STABLE FAMILIES (ALN – 93.667) SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBER 2203PRFPSS (Federal Award Years: 10/1/2021 through 9/30/2023); 2202PRFPCV (Federal Award Years: 10/1/2021 through 9/30/2023) 2211PRSOSR (Federal Award Years: 10/1/2021 through 9/30/2023) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN (ADFAN, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE – MATERIAL WEAKNESS AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR § 200.302 (a) establishes that each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. In addition, the SF-425 Federal Financial Report requires the reporting of financial activities related to Federal awards. The accounting basis used for reporting expenditures (whether cash or accrual) must align with the accounting system employed by the recipient organization. The 2 CFR § 200.302 (b), establish that the recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): … (6) written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. The 2 CFR section 200.328(c) establishes that the recipient or subrecipient must submit financial reports as required by the Federal award. Reports submitted annually by the recipient or subrecipient must be due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period. Reports submitted quarterly or semiannually must be due no later than 30 calendar days after the reporting period. The 2 CFR §200.303 (a) establishes that the recipient and subrecipient must: establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance for reporting requirements, we selected the Grant Awards 2203PRFPSS and 2202PRFPCV, which closes in the audit period from July 2023 to June 2024, to validate the recorded amounts. Upon evaluating the report for the Grant Award 2203PRFPSS, we found the following deficiencies: 1) The accounting basis should be Cash Basis instead of Accrual Basis, according to the accounting system used. Additionally, they provided a Procedures Manual for the Finance and Budget Divisions, approved in 2009 and delivered in Word format, which states that the accounting basis is “accrual”, even though their current system operates on a cash basis and no conversion to accrual basis was made. 2) The total Federal expenditure reported on line (e) does not match the database provided by the PRDF. 3) The matching expenditure on line (j) does not match the database provided by the PRDF. 4) The report was not submitted within the established deadline, December 31, 2023 and they submitted the report on July 8, 2024. 5) During the internal control’s interviews, we found that there is no designated person responsible for reviewing the information entered by the preparer. As part of our audit procedures over internal controls and compliance for reporting requirements, we selected the Grant Award 2211PRSOSR, which closes in the audit period from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, to validate the recorded amounts. Upon evaluating the report, we found the following deficiencies: 1) The accounting basis should be Cash Basis instead of Accrual Basis, according to the accounting system used. Additionally, they provided a Procedures Manual for the Finance and Budget Divisions, approved in 2009 and delivered in Word format, which states that the accounting basis is “accrual”, even though their current system operates on a cash basis and no conversion to accrual basis was made. 2) The total Federal expenditure reported on line (e) does not match the database provided by the PRDF. 3) The report was not submitted within the established deadline, December 31, 2023 and they submitted the report on June 10, 2024. 4) During the internal control’s interviews, we found that there is no designated person responsible for reviewing the information entered by the preparer. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This deficiency is a systemic problem. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, training, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to Federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statement and SEFA. STATEMENT OF CAUSE ADFAN does not have internal controls to effectively review the process and comply with the reporting requirements. The absence of effective internal controls at ADFAN to review processes and ensure compliance with reporting requirements can be attributed to inadequate organizational structure and insufficiently defined roles and responsibilities. There is no designated individual or team responsible for overseeing the accuracy and completeness of financial data entered reports. As mentioned above in the condition, this responsibility falls under one person and does not have segregation of duties. This gap in accountability stems from a lack of internal review and insufficient oversight mechanisms, which restrains the organization's ability to ensure that reports are fully aligned with the required compliance standards. Additionally, there is a lack of training or resources dedicated to maintaining and monitoring compliance which contributes to the failure in reporting requirements. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADFAN does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports for the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING This is a repeat of a finding reported in the prior audit as Finding Numbers is 2023-023/2023-054. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that ADFAN ensures the SF-425 is completed using the appropriate accounting basis consistent with the organization’s financial system. Additionally, ADFAN should establish and implement internal control procedures that include formal review process to verify the accuracy and completeness of the reported information and designate responsible personnel for the review and approval of reports prior to submission to ensure compliance with Federal reporting requirements.

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-045 (See Finding Reference Number 2024-017) FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 96.001) SOCIAL SECURITY – DISABILITY INSURANCE U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AWARD NUMBERS 1804RQD100 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2017 – 9/30/2018) 1904RQD100 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2018 – 9/30/2019) 2004RQD100 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2019 – 9/30/2020) 2104RQD100 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2020 – 9/30/2021) 2204RQD100 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2021 – 9/30/2022) 2304RQD100 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023) 2404RQD100 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2023 – 9/30/2024) ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARIAT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – FINANCIAL TYPE OF FINDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE – MATERIAL WEAKNESS AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA According to the Program Operations Manual (POMS) DI 39506.203-Updating and Reconciling Unliquidated Obligations published by the Social Security Administration (SSA), legitimate unliquidated obligations must be backed up by records or papers that explain the nature of the obligations and provide evidence for the amounts reported. It is also crucial that the agency's reported unliquidated obligations reflect any modifications or cancellations of Consultative Examinations (CE) and Medical Evidence of Record (MER) authorizations. State authorities should check CE authorizations to see if the unliquidated obligation is an authorization that is still in existence and evaluate unliquidated obligations at least once a month to cancel those that are no longer valid. POMS 39506.210 Preparations Instructions for Form SSA-4513 instructs the State Agency to check the appropriate box in the report to indicate the attachment of Form-871. Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management Section (a) establish the administrative requirements for the program, which include the requirement that state and the other non-Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms and conditions; and the tracing of funds to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to the Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION The State Agency Report of Obligations for SSA Disability Programs, Form Report SSA-4513, was incomplete and inaccurate. During the audit procedures the following deficiencies were noted by us: 1) It was not specified in the Puerto Rico Disability Determination Services (PR-DDS) Accounting Department's Form SSA-4513 for September 2023 and June 2024 if Form SSA-871, State Agency Schedule for Equipment Purchases for SSA Disability Programs, had to be included with Form SSA-4513 for FYs 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, and 2018. Whether this was necessary or not is unknown. 2) For the September 2023 Forms SSA-4513, the support for unliquidated obligations for FYs 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were absent, incomplete or had differences. For FY 2023, there was a difference of $560,158 between the amount included in the report and the support provided for review. For FY 2022, there was a difference of $7,795 between the amount included in the report and the support provided for review. For FY 2021, there was a difference of $580,750 between the amount included in the report and the support provided for review. For FY 2020, there was a difference of $518,630 between the amount included in the report and the support provided for review and no support was provided for unliquidated obligations. 3) For the June 2024 Forms SSA-4513, the support for unliquidated obligations for FYs 2024, 2023 and 2022 were absent, incomplete or had differences. For FY 2024, there was a difference of $1,402,319 between the amount included in the report and the support provided for review. For FY 2023, there was a difference of $236,152 between the amount included in the report and the support provided for review. For FY 2012, there was a difference of $199,043 between the amount included in the report and the support provided for review. 4) There were discrepancies between the accounting system and the total amount of disbursements on Form SSA-4513 for June 2024 and September 2023, and no observations were submitted in the report remarks section and personnel were unable to provide explanations during the audit process. Following are the discrepancies: (1) September 2023 Form SSA-4513: a. $925 discrepancy in FY 2022 b. $24,806 discrepancy in FY 2021 c. $9,251 discrepancy in FY 2020 d. $8,682 discrepancy in FY 2019 e. $49 discrepancy in FY 2018 (2) June 2024 Form SSA-4513: a. ($156,693) discrepancy in FY 2024 b. $101,737 discrepancy in FY 2023 c. $925 discrepancy in FY 2022 d. $39,656 discrepancy in FY 2021 e. $63,275 discrepancy in FY 2020 5) The PR-DDS paid back $539,771 to the grantor for indirect costs charged in excess according to the Form 4513 for FY 2020. Because an expense is reported at the time a request is registered by the PR-DDS Accounting Department Special Payer, this resulted in an overstatement in previous Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards and in quarterly reports. 6) The PR-DDS Accounting Department submitted Form SSA-4513 for FY 2020 on July 16, 2024. This form was revised on July 19, 2024. We reviewed the revised form, but the report does not identify the updated form as revised. 7) The database submitted to support financial statements amounts, presents a difference of $192,759 between the accounting system (PRIFAS) and the database for FY 2024. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. Information needed to effectively generate financial reports should be available through the financial management system. STATEMENT OF CAUSE Internal controls is not in place in the PR-DDS Accounting Department to ensure that vendor payments are processed on schedule. Furthermore, as mandated by DI 39506.203, the PR-DDS Accounting Department has not put monitoring measures in place to routinely assess unliquidated commitments. Furthermore, the PR-DDS Accounting Department lacks internal procedures for recording discrepancies between financial reporting and accounting systems. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The PR-DDS raises the possibility of incurred costs without the option to obtain reimbursement from the Federal grant if appropriate procedures are not in place to pay suppliers on time and liquidate obligations on time. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING This is a repeat of a finding reported in the prior audit as Finding Numbers is 2023-024/2023-055. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend the Accounting Department of PR-DDS establish procedures to make sure Form SSA-4513 is properly examined, recorded, and compliant with POMS DI 39506.203. To cancel commitments that are no longer valid, we advise the PR-DDS Accounting Department to check unliquidated obligations at least once a month. Furthermore, we recommend a formal reconciliation between the quarterly reports and the accounting system-documented disbursements, with an explanation of any discrepancies included in remarks of the Form SSA-4513.

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2024-046 (See Finding Reference Number 2024-018) FEDERAL PROGRAMS (ALN – 93.558) TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF) (ALN – 93.560) PAYMENT TO TERRITORIES – ADULT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AWARD NUMBERS 2022G996117 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2021 – 9/30/2022) 2023G996117 (Federal Award Year: 10/1/2022 – 9/30/2023) 2022G9922PT (Federal Award Years: 10/1/2022 through 9/30/2025) 2301PRTABD (Federal Award Years: 10/1/2023 through 9/30/2026) ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE FAMILY (ADSEF, BY ITS SPANISH ACRONYM) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT REPORTING – FINANCIAL REPORTING TYPE OF FINDING INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE – MATERIAL WEAKNESS AND MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA The 2 CFR 200 §200.302, Financial Management, establishes that: “(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450. (b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity. (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand. (3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. … (6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305 and (7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. STATEMENT OF CONDITION As part of our audit procedures over the reporting requirements for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Payment to Territories – Adult (PTTA) programs, we reviewed two ACF-196TR reports submitted during the fiscal year under audit. Our review disclosed deficiencies related to the accuracy, support, reconciliation, and timeliness of reported expenditures. Specifically, we noted the following: • Administrative expenditures for both TANF and PTTA are recorded under the same accounting account number and Assistance Listing Number associated with TANF. As a result, the PRIFA accounting system does not segregate administrative expenditures by federal award or Assistance Listing Number, limiting the ability to identify and track expenditures attributable to each program. • Amounts reported in the ACF-196TR reports could not be reconciled to the PRIFA accounting records, particularly for administrative expenditures. Upon request, management was unable to provide supporting schedules, reconciliations, or documentation demonstrating how the reported amounts were derived. Supporting information was prepared only after it was requested during the audit. • For grant award 2023G996117, reported expenditures in the quarterly report of September 30, 2023, that did not agree with the underlying accounting records. We identified differences of $7,266.40 in Line 6A (Work-Related Activities and Expenses), $1,745,668.00 in Line 5A (Basic Assistance), $1,645,366.55 in Line 6J (Administration), $2,007,611.62 in Line 3 (Transfer to SSBG), and $103,052.41 in Line 10 (Total Expenditures). In addition, the report was submitted after the applicable due date. • For grant award 2401PRTANF, reported expenditures in the June 30, 2024 quarterly report that also differed from the accounting records. We identified differences of $12,312.07 in Line 6A (Work-Related Activities and Expenses), $1,898,639.95 in Line 6J (Administration), $3,786,696.14 in Line 3 (Transfer to SSBG), and $1,902,297.08 in Line 10 (Total Expenditures). Furthermore, the report maintained by ADSEF did not contain evidence of the submission date; therefore, we were unable to determine whether the report was submitted within the required timeframe. QUESTIONED COSTS None. PERSPECTIVE INFORMATION This is a systematic deficiency. Procedures and internal controls manuals should provide for and ensure the segregation of duties, and the reconciliation of financial information reported to Federal agencies against the accounting records used to prepare financial statements and SEFA. In addition, the financial management system should provide to account separately the administrative expenditures incurred among all Federal programs administered. ADSEF failure to support reported amounts with verifiable documentation and the absence of independent review increases the risk of inaccurate or misstated financial data being reported to the Federal awarding agency. STATEMENT OF CAUSE During our interviews and understanding of the internal controls over financial reporting, we noted that only one person prepares, submits and certifies the ACF-196TR reports. No proper segregation of duties exists, that allows for validation of all accounting data before submitting the reports. In addition, the procedures manual for preparing reports does not establish a clear process for obtaining information, validating it, recording it, preparing it, and reporting it, as well as the responsibilities and segregation of duties to ensure that the reported information is consistent with ADSEF's accounting records. PRIFAS accounting data base as configured, does not provide for the administrative expenditures incurred from the TANF and Payment to Territories – Adult programs to be segregated. ADSEF lacks internal controls that allow for the timely validation and reconciliation of financial information. Furthermore, they lack a written procedures manual detailing the processes to follow in obtaining accounting data and reporting it to the Federal government, ensuring that the responsibility does not fall on a single individual. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT ADSEF does not ensure that the reports are accurate and traceable to the accounting database used to prepare their financial reports to the Federal Agencies and their financial statement. IDENTIFICATION OF REPEAT FINDING This is a repeat of a finding reported in the prior audit as Finding Numbers is 2023-025/2023-056. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend ADSEF to establish written procedures and internal controls manuals to provide and document the segregation of duties related to the reporting compliance requirement. Additionally, work with the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury to provide accounting records to segregate the administrative expenditures of both programs.

Assistance Listing Number: 93.558 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entity: Virginia Department of Social Services Pass-Through Entity Identifying Number: BEN-21-029 Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 CFR §200.302(b) requires non-federal entities to maintain effective control and accountability over all funds and to provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each federally sponsored project or program. In addition, 2 CFR §200.328 requires financial reports to be supported by the entity’s accounting records and to be accurate and complete. Condition: The organization prepared various required financial reporting line items using budgeted amounts rather than actual expenditures recorded in the underlying accounting records. As a result, reported amounts did not agree to the general ledger and supporting accounting documentation. The variances were identified across multiple reporting line items and were not supported by reconciliations to actual expenditures. Cause: The condition occurred due to deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting. Specifically, UCM relied on budgeted amounts rather than actual expenditures recorded in the accounting system when preparing required financial reports. In addition, formal written procedures do not clearly require that reported amounts be reconciled to the underlying accounting records prior to submission, and there was insufficient review and oversight to ensure that financial reports were prepared using actual data from the general ledger. Effect or Potential Effect: Because financial reports were not prepared using actual expenditures recorded in the accounting records, reported amounts may be inaccurate or incomplete. The use of budgeted amounts rather than actual financial data increases the risk that expenditures reported to the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity are misstated and not supported by the organization’s accounting records. As a result, UCM may be out of compliance with federal reporting requirements and federal agencies may rely on inaccurate financial information for monitoring and funding decisions. Recommendation: UCM should strengthen its internal controls over federal financial reporting by establishing and documenting procedures requiring that all reports submitted to federal awarding agencies or pass-through entities be prepared using actual expenditures recorded in the accounting system. These procedures should include a reconciliation of reported amounts to the general ledger and supporting documentation prior to submission, as well as an independent review process to ensure reported information is accurate, complete, and compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges the finding and will work to implement appropriate corrective actions to address the deficiency and improve compliance going forward.

FINDING 2024-006 Subject: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Assistance Listings Number: 84.010 Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S010A210014, S010A220014, S010A230014 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Participation of Private School Children; Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate; Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment Testing Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 39 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report for control activities - activities allowed or unallowed; allowable costs/cost principles; cash management; reporting; matching, level of effort, earmarking; and special tests and provisions - participation in private school children. The prior audit finding numbers were 2022-005, 2022-006, 2022-008, and 2022-009. Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the entity will achieve its objectives. For federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that the entity will comply with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its awards. Internal control is not a single event but an ongoing process that operates through five integrated components: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. Each component must function effectively, and the components must operate together in an integrated manner, for an internal control system to be effective. Deficiencies in the internal control system were identified across the five components and are described below. Control Environment - Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Participation of Private School Children; Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate; Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment Testing The School Corporation had not established a strong foundation for an effective internal control system. There was no demonstrated emphasis on the importance of internal controls or on compliance with federal program requirements. Risk Assessment - Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Participation of Private School Children; Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate; Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment Testing The School Corporation had not defined objectives necessary to identify risks or determine risk tolerances. Management did not identify, analyze, or respond to risks that could affect the achievement of objectives, including risks arising from significant changes to operations or the potential for fraud. Control Activities The School Corporation did not maintain sufficient financial records for its Title I programs. Although separate funds were established, expenditures were not accurately recorded, preventing the auditors from properly testing compliance with the federal requirements for the Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Participation of Private School Children compliance requirements. Notable errors included payroll mapping errors, as well as unsupported reimbursement requests. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 40 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Expenditures as reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are based on reimbursements received during the audit period. To determine the specific expenditures associated with each reimbursement request the corresponding ledger activity or other applicable supporting documentation was requested. Based on the documentation provided, or lack thereof, it was determined that reimbursement requests were not prepared using expenditures recorded in the Title I funds. Instead, other undocumented or inconsistently retained records were used, and the amounts in those records did not align with the reimbursement requests submitted or the related fund activity. Of the 13 reimbursement claims submitted:  There were 5 reimbursement requests totaling $854,889 filed in fiscal year 2022-2023 that had no supporting documentation, and the amounts requested did not agree with the disbursement activity recorded in the grant program funds.  There were 8 reimbursement requests totaling $496,155 and received in 2023-2024 that had supporting documentation; however, the documentation agreed with reimbursement request amount in only 4 instances. For the other 4 reimbursement requests where documentation was provided, discrepancies totaling $15,982 were identified between the documentation and the amounts requested. Additionally, the documentation used to support 2023-2024 reimbursement requests did not correspond to the ledger activity recorded in the Title I program funds; instead, the School Corporation relied on separate individual payroll reports that were not tied to the program's financial records. Due to the lack of adequate documentation, we were unable to determine the validity of expenditures claimed for reimbursement, and, therefore, could not determine a population of expenditures to verify for compliance testing. This resulted in questioned costs totaling $1,351,044. Additional issues included:  The former Chief Financial Officer did not direct the payroll clerk to allocate salaries and benefits for Title I personnel to the appropriate funds. As a result, salary and benefit costs were charged to the Title I funds for employees who did not work on the program, while costs for employees who did work on the program were charged to non-Title I funds.  Receipt activity recorded in the Title I program funds did not always reflect actual Title I grant receipts. For example, receipts totaling $63,901 for the Supportive Effective Instruction State Grants program (formerly Improving Teacher Quality State Grants), Assistance Listings Number 84.367, were incorrectly recorded in the Title I fund.  A separate fund was not created for the 2022-2023 grant project year as required by the pass-through entity; instead, an existing project year fund was used.  Transfers totaling $993,763 in 2022-2023 and $73,107 in 2023-2024 were made into the Title I program funds from other funds or between Title I project years without adequate supporting documentation explaining the composition of the transfer amounts.  Transfers totaling $650,150 in 2022-2023 were made out of the Title I program funds to other funds or other Title I project years, without sufficient supporting documentation identifying the nature of the transferred amounts. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 41 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Information and Communication - Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Participation of Private School Children; Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate; Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment Testing The School Corporation had not established adequate communication methods or practices to ensure that reliable information was identified, captured, and communicated to the appropriate internal and external parties. Monitoring - Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Participation of Private School Children; Special Tests and Provisions - Annual Report Card, High School Graduation Rate; Special Tests and Provisions - Assessment Testing The School Corporation did not perform ongoing or periodic evaluations to determine whether internal controls were operating effectively or to identify needed improvement. In addition, the School Corporation did not have a process in place to track or to follow-up on corrective actions written in response to audit findings. Due to the number and severity of the issues identified with the program's financial records and supporting documentation, we were unable to perform the procedures necessary to test the program for compliance. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following (see also §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . . INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 42 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. The non-Federal entity must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." Cause The School Corporation had not implemented an effective system of internal controls. Changes in key financial personnel, along with insufficient employee training, contributed to processes and procedures not being properly developed or consistently followed. Additionally, employees' salaries and benefits associated with the Title I programs were not mapped to the proper funds in the accounting software. Finally, reimbursement requests were completed based upon documentation, other than the ledger, that was not always retained or when retained did not agree with the amounts requested. Transfers in and out of Title I program funds did not contain sufficient supporting documentation to determine the specific purposes of the transfers Effect Because the five components of internal control were not properly designed or implemented, the School Corporation's internal control system could not be effective. As a result, general and fraud-related risks, as well as risks arising from significant operational changes, could negatively impact the School Corporation. Existing internal control deficiencies may continue undetected, and additional weaknesses may exist without being identified. Additionally, because the School Corporation did not establish an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the required documentation was obtained and retained, we were unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to determine whether the School Corporation complied with the applicable federal program compliance requirements. This lack of documentation created a scope limitation for the audit and increased the risk that noncompliance, if present, may not have been detected. The inability to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements may affect the School Corporation's ability to support current program expenditures and may place eligibility for future federal funding at risk. Finally, salary and benefit expenditures were recorded to the Title I grant program funds for employees who were not involved with the program and expenditures for those involved with the program were recorded to non-Title I funds. Reimbursement requests could not be reconciled to the detailed ledger of expenditures. As such, a complete and accurate population of expenditures, that reconciled to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards or the financial statement could not be determined. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 43 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,351,044 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation design and implement a system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to the five components of internal control. Management should define clear objectives, identify and assess risks, and develop policies and procedures to address those risks. Regular monitoring should be conducted to ensure internal controls are operating effectively and deficiencies are addressed promptly. We also recommended that the School Corporation ensure employees' salaries and benefits are properly mapped within the accounting system. Additionally, we recommended that all documentation to support a reimbursement request be attached to the reimbursement request and reconciled to the ledger at the time of request. We also recommended that any necessary transfers contain sufficient supporting documentation. Finally, we recommended that the School Corporation maintain complete and accurate records for all grant funds and project years. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-008 Subject: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: Special Education Grants to States, COVID-19 - Special Education Grants to States, Special Education Preschool Grants, COVID-19 - Special Education Preschool Grants Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, 84.173X Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): 22611-138-PN01, 23611-138-PN01, 24611-138-PN01, 22611-138-ARP, 22619-138-PN01, 23619-138-PN01, 24619-138-PN01, 22619-138-ARP Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Period of Performance; Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report. The prior audit finding numbers were 2022-010, 2022-011, and 2022-012. Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the entity will achieve its objectives. For federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that the entity will comply with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its awards. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 47 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Internal control is not a single event but an ongoing process that operates through five integrated components: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. Each component must function effectively, and the components must operate together in an integrated manner, for an internal control system to be effective. Deficiencies in the internal control system were identified across the five components and are described below. Control Environment The School Corporation had not established a strong foundation for an effective internal control system. There was no demonstrated emphasis on the importance of internal controls or on compliance with federal program requirements. Risk Assessment The School Corporation had not defined objectives necessary to identify risks or determine risk tolerances. Management did not identify, analyze, or respond to risks that could affect the achievement of objectives, including risks arising from significant changes to operations or the potential for fraud. Control Activities The School Corporation receives federal funding through the Special Education Cluster (IDEA), including the Special Education Grants to States and Special Education Preschool Grants programs, administered by the Indiana Department of Education. These funds are subject to federal requirements regarding activities allowed or unallowed; allowable costs/cost principles; cash management; matching, level of effort, earmarking; period of performance; reporting; and financial documentation. The School Corporation did not maintain sufficient financial records for its special education programs. Although separate funds were established expenditures were not accurately recorded, preventing the auditors from properly testing compliance with the federal requirements for the Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Period of Performance; and Reporting compliance requirements. Notable errors included payroll and fund mapping errors, as well as unsupported reimbursement requests. Salaries and benefits for special education staff were incorrectly mapped, resulting in expenditures being charged to the wrong funds. Additionally, program reimbursement requests were not based upon ledger expenditures and relied on documentation that was either missing or inconsistent with the amounts claimed. Due to insufficient documentation, most expenditures claimed for reimbursement could not be verified, resulting in questioned costs totaling $1,694,906. Of the 23 claims for reimbursement filed:  There were 11 reimbursements totaling $1,289,892 that lacked supporting documentation and the amount claimed did not agree with the ledger disbursement activity.  There were 11 reimbursements totaling $404,904 that either agreed with the grant fund ledger activity or documentation was retained to support the amount claimed for reimbursement. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 48 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued)  There was 1 reimbursement totaling $110 that differed from the amount claimed by $1,837, with the amount claimed being less than the supporting documentation. Additional issues included:  Receipt activity within the funds was not always reflective of the program grant money received. Special education program receipts totaling $47,913 were receipted to nonspecial education grant funds.  A separate fund was not created to identify and record financial activity for each grant project year as required by the pass-through entity. Specifically, separate funds were not created for the Special Education Preschool grant for project years 2022 and 2023.  Transfers between funds were made to address deficit fund balances, either due to financial activity being misallocated or errors discovered in transaction recording. However, supporting documentation for these corrections was not kept. In fiscal year 2022-2023, a total of $222,602 was moved into program funds from other sources or between various special education grant project year funds, while $6,653 was transferred in during 2023-2024. Conversely, funds totaling $699,655 in 2022-2023 and $722,283 in 2023-2024 were transferred out of program grant funds to other accounts or between special education grant project year funds. Information and Communication The School Corporation had not established adequate communication methods or practices to ensure that reliable information was identified, captured, and communicated to the appropriate internal and external parties. Monitoring The School Corporation did not perform ongoing or periodic evaluations to determine whether internal controls were operating effectively or to identify needed improvement. In addition, the School Corporation did not have a process in place to track or to follow-up on corrective actions written in response to audit findings. Due to the number and severity of the issues identified with the program's financial records and supporting documentation, we were unable to perform the procedures necessary to test the program for compliance. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 49 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following (see also §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. The non-Federal entity must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." Cause The School Corporation had not implemented an effective system of internal controls. Changes in key financial personnel, along with insufficient employee training, contributed to processes and procedures not being properly developed or consistently followed. Additionally, employees' salaries and benefits associated with the special education programs were not mapped to the proper funds in the accounting software. Finally, reimbursement requests were completed based on documentation, other than the ledger, that was not always retained or when retained did not agree with the amounts being requested. Effect Because the five components of internal control were not properly designed or implemented, the School Corporation's internal control system could not be effective. As a result, general and fraud-related risks, as well as risks arising from significant operational changes, could negatively impact the School Corporation. Existing internal control deficiencies may continue undetected, and additional weaknesses may exist without being identified. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 50 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Additionally, because the School Corporation did not establish an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the required documentation was obtained and retained, we were unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to determine whether the School Corporation complied with the applicable federal program compliance requirements. This lack of documentation created a scope limitation for the audit and increased the risk that noncompliance, if present, may not have been detected. The inability to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements may affect the School Corporation's ability to support current program expenditures and may place eligibility for future federal funding at risk. Finally, salary and benefit expenditures were recorded to the special education grant program funds for employees who were not involved with the program and expenditures for those involved with the program were recorded to nonspecial education funds. Reimbursement requests could not be reconciled to the detailed ledger of expenditures. As such, a complete and accurate population of expenditures, that reconciled to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards or the financial statement could not be determined. Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,694,906 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation design and implement a system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to the five components of internal control. Management should define clear objectives, identify and assess risks, and develop policies and procedures to address those risks. Regular monitoring should be conducted to ensure internal controls are operating effectively and deficiencies are addressed promptly. We also recommended that the School Corporation ensure employees' salaries and benefits are properly mapped within the accounting system. Additionally, we recommended that all documentation to support a reimbursement request be attached to the reimbursement request and reconciled to the ledger at the time of request. We also recommended that any necessary transfers contain sufficient supporting documentation. Finally, we recommended that the School Corporation maintain complete and accurate records for all grant funds and project years. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

FINDING 2024-009 Subject: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Programs: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listings Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U Federal Award Numbers and Years (or Other Identifying Numbers): S425D210013, S425U210013 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Education Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Equipment and Real Property Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements; Special Tests and Provisions - Participation of Private School Children Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Modified Opinion Repeat Finding This is a repeat finding from the immediately prior audit report for activities allowed or unallowed, allowable costs/cost principles, cash management, equipment and real property management, and reporting. The prior audit finding numbers were 2022-013, 2022-014, 2022-015, and 2022-016. Condition and Context Internal control is generally defined as a process affected by an entity's oversight body, management, and other personnel that provides reasonable assurance that the entity will achieve its objectives. For federal awards, nonfederal entities, such as the School Corporation, are required to establish and maintain internal control over federal awards to provide reasonable assurance that the entity will comply with applicable federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its awards. Internal control is not a single event but an ongoing process that operates through five integrated components: Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information and Communication, and Monitoring. Each component must function effectively, and the components must operate together in an integrated manner, for an internal control system to be effective. Deficiencies in the internal control system were identified across the five components and are described below. Control Environment The School Corporation had not established a strong foundation for an effective internal control system. There was no demonstrated emphasis on the importance of internal controls or on compliance with federal program requirements. Risk Assessment The School Corporation had not defined objectives necessary to identify risks or determine risk tolerances. Management did not identify, analyze, or respond to risks that could affect the achievement of objectives, including risks arising from significant changes to operations or the potential for fraud. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 52 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Control Activities The School Corporation did not maintain sufficient financial records for its COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Fund program. Although separate funds were established, expenditures were not accurately recorded, preventing the auditors from properly testing compliance with the federal requirements for Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles; Cash Management; Equipment and Real Property Management; Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking; Reporting; Special Tests and Provisions - Wage Rate Requirements; and Special Tests and Provision - Participation of Private School Children compliance requirements. Notable errors included expenditures recorded to the grant funds in the amount of $1,623,704 more than the grant amount awarded, as well as unsupported reimbursement requests. The School Corporation attempted to identify expenditures that they no longer wanted to be considered costs under the grant program to correct the overspending. However, instead of reclassifying the expenditures to the proper funds, monies were transferred into the grant funds from other School Corporation funds. The documentation to support the expenditures to be reallocated was not complete as $296,202 of the transfer amount could not be associated with specific expenditure transactions. Additionally, $839,096 in transactions identified to be reclassified were associated with the prior fiscal year 2021-2022 financial activity. After considering transactions recorded in the fund during 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 that were reallocated to other funds the remaining expenditures in the grant program funds were $138,134 less than the total grant funds claimed for reimbursement during the audit period. Due to insufficient documentation, expenditures claimed for reimbursement could not be verified, resulting in questioned costs totaling $1,654,481. Information and Communication The School Corporation had not established adequate communication methods or practices to ensure that reliable information was identified, captured, and communicated to the appropriate internal and external parties. Monitoring The School Corporation did not perform ongoing or periodic evaluations to determine whether internal controls were operating effectively or to identify needed improvement. In addition, the School Corporation did not have a process in place to track or to follow-up on corrective actions written in response to audit findings. Due to the number and severity of the issues identified with the program's financial records and supporting documentation, we were unable to perform the procedures necessary to test the program for compliance. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 53 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following (see also §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337): (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . . (3) Records that identify adequately the source and application of funds for federallyfunded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures, income and interest and be supported by source documentation. (4) Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. The non-Federal entity must adequately safeguard all assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303. . . ." 2 CFR 200.334 states in part: "Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non-Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for the Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annual, from the date of submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient. . . ." Cause The School Corporation had not implemented an effective system of internal controls. Changes in key financial personnel, along with insufficient employee training, contributed to processes and procedures not being properly developed or consistently followed. Additionally, expenditures were not properly reviewed to determine if costs were properly recorded to grant funds. Finally, reimbursement requests were completed based on documentation, other than the ledger, that was not always retained or when retained did not agree with the amounts being requested. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 54 SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Effect Because the five components of internal control were not properly designed or implemented, the School Corporation's internal control system could not be effective. As a result, general and fraud-related risks, as well as risks arising from significant operational changes, could negatively impact the School Corporation. Existing internal control deficiencies may continue undetected, and additional weaknesses may exist without being identified. Additionally, because the School Corporation did not establish an effective system of internal controls to ensure that the required documentation was obtained and retained, we were unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to determine whether the School Corporation complied with the applicable federal program compliance requirements. This lack of documentation created a scope limitation for the audit and increased the risk that noncompliance, if present, may not have been detected. The inability to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements may affect the School Corporation's ability to support current program expenditures and may place eligibility for future federal funding at risk. Finally, reimbursement requests could not be reconciled to the detailed ledger of expenditures. As such, a complete and accurate population of expenditures, that reconciled to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards or the financial statement could not be determined. Questioned Costs Questioned costs in the amount of $1,654,481 were identified as detailed in the Condition and Context. Recommendation We recommended the School Corporation design and implement a system of internal controls, which would include policies and procedures related to the five components of internal control. Management should define clear objectives, identify and assess risks, and develop policies and procedures to address those risks. Regular monitoring should be conducted to ensure internal controls are operating effectively and deficiencies are addressed promptly. We also recommended that the School Corporation review expenditures and financial ledger reports to ensure activity is recorded to the correct fund. Additionally, we recommended that all documentation to support a reimbursement request be attached to the reimbursement request and reconciled to the ledger at the time of request. Finally, we recommended that the School Corporation maintain complete and accurate records for all grant funds and project years. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

Finding: 2024-006 Voided Rental Payments. Federal Programs - Continuum of Care. Federal Financial Assistance Listing - 14.267. Federal Award Numbers - OK0024L6I021111, OK0024L6I022113, OK0024L6I022212, OK0024L6I022213, OK0024L6I022214, OK0024L6I022215, OK0024L6I022316. Federal Agency - Department of Housing and Urban Development. Pass-through Entities - City of Oklahoma City and the City of Norman. Allowable Activities or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Significant deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance. Criteria: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.302(b) ) requires recipients and subrecipients to maintain financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results. In addition, 2 CFR 200.403 requires costs charged to federal awards to be allowable and adequately supported. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: Hope received reimbursement for rental expenditures that were later voided due to tenants no longer being current residents. Cause: Management did not maintain controls to ensure that expenditures claimed for reimbursement were supported by actual costs incurred. Backdated and adjusting entries were recorded without reconciliation to underlying expense documentation or budget tracking schedules and ultimately claimed to the granting pass-through agency. Effect or Potential Effect: Expenditures claimed for reimbursement exceed actual expenditures incurred. As a result, a portion of grant expenditures recorded is unsupported and may be unallowable. Questioned Costs: 1,305 questioned and 9,675 of likely questioned costs. Context: A nonstatistical sampling of 54 out of over 3,000 transactions were selected for testing of Activities Allowed and Unallowed, and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Two transactions totaling 1,305 were selected for testing that were voided after invoicing. The expenditure detail included 9,675 of other expenditures with the description "voided." Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: Management may consider a subsequent review or an additional review when adjusting and removing costs after drawdowns to ensure any claimed expenses that subsequently become voided are adjusted in future drawdowns. Views of Responsible Officials: Management's response is included in the corrective action plan.

Finding: 2024-007 Late Fees. Federal Programs - Continuum of Care. Federal Financial Assistance Listing - 14.267. Federal Award Number - OK0024L6I021111, OK0024L6I022113, OK0024L6I022212, OK0024L6I022213, OK0024L6I022214, OK0024L6I022215, OK0024L6I022316. Federal Agency - Department of Housing and Urban Development. Pass-through Entity - City of Oklahoma City and the City of Norman. Allowable Activities or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Significant deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance. Criteria: Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.302(b) ) requires recipients and subrecipients to maintain financial management systems that provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of financial results. In addition, 2 CFR 200.403 requires costs charged to federal awards to be allowable and adequately supported. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: Hope incurred rental late fees related to housing units of participants in the program. These late fees resulted from rent payments remitted after the contractual due date and were claimed as part of rental costs. Late fees represent penalties and are not an allowable cost under the program. The tenant-caused damage exception permitted under 24 CFR Part 578 does not extend to late fees. Cause: Hope did not establish internal controls to identify and exclude unallowable late fees from rent charged to the program. Additionally, reimbursement requests were not reviewed to ensure penalties were segregated from allowable rental costs. Effect or Potential Effect: Hope incurred unallowable costs. Questioned Costs: 500. Context: A nonstatistical sampling of 54 out of over 3,000 transactions were selected for testing of Activities Allowed and Unallowed, and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Four transactions included rental late fees in the rent expense claimed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: Management may consider reviewing both the approval of rental expenses prior to issuing rental assistance checks as well as reimbursement processing of rental costs to ensure late fees are not included. Views of Responsible Officials: Management's response is included in the corrective action plan.

Finding No: 2024-110 SF-425 Strengthen Preparation and Document Retention Controls over SF-425 State Agency: Oklahoma Department of Health Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.268 Federal Program Name: Immunizations Cooperative Agreement Federal Award Number: NH23IP922575-01-02, NH23IP922575-02-00, NH23IP922575-02-06, NH23IP922575- 03-00, NH23IP922575-04-00, NH23IP922575-05-06, NH23IP922575-05-13 Federal Award Year: 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 Compliance Category: Reporting Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The Department is required to prepare and submit complete, accurate, and supportable Federal Financial Reports (FFRs, SF425) for Assistance Listing 93.268 in accordance with the grant award terms, the HHS Grants Policy Statement, and 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.333, including maintaining adequate supporting documentation and subsidiary schedules to substantiate amounts reported and to demonstrate proper cutoff of reporting periods. Internal policies and procedures should ensure that all amounts reported on the SF425 are reconciled to the underlying accounting records and retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements. Condition: Supporting schedules to substantiate the reported amounts for Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 93.268 were not available for two of the six (33%) SF‑425 FFRs selected for testing. Known cutoff issues related to financial reporting were also reported in SA‑01 [finding #2024-102], which further affects the accuracy and completeness of the reporting for this program. Additionally, the Department did not retain adequate documentation to support its FFRs for ALN 93.268, resulting in an incomplete audit trail for the amounts reported. Cause and Effect: The Department’s existing procedures for preparing and retaining supporting schedules for SF425 reports under ALN 93.268 were not consistently followed to ensure all supporting documentation was retained. In addition, controls over period end cutoff for reported expenditures and program income, as noted in SA01 [finding #2024-102], were not operating effectively for this program. As a result, two of six SF425 reports tested for ALN 93.268 not fully supported by underlying schedules, and known cutoff issues increase the risk that amounts reported on the FFRs may be incomplete, inaccurate, or misstated. These weaknesses diminish the reliability of the audit trail, impair management’s ability to demonstrate compliance with federal reporting requirements, and increases the likelihood of questioned costs or future compliance findings. Recommendation: The Department should strengthen its internal controls over the preparation and retention of SF‑425 reports for ALN 93.268 by establishing and documenting standardized procedures that require the preparation of reconciled supporting schedules for each FFR, including clear cutoff procedures that reconcile reported amounts to the general ledger and grant sub‑ledgers for the applicable reporting period; requiring an independent review of each SF‑425 and its supporting schedules prior to submission to verify mathematical accuracy, proper cutoff, and agreement to the accounting records; implementing a centralized document‑retention process to ensure that all supporting schedules and related documentation for submitted FFRs are retained in accordance with federal and Department record‑retention requirements; and providing periodic training to staff responsible for grants accounting and reporting on the revised procedures and retention requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) Contact Person: Kimberly Courtney, Director of Accounting Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/26 Management Response: The Oklahoma State Department of Health agrees with the finding. Please see the corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report.

Finding No: 2024-111 Strengthen Preparation and Document Retention Controls over SF-425 State Agency: Oklahoma Department of Health Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing Number: 93.323 Federal Program Name: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) Federal Award Numbers: NU50CK000535-01-11, NU50CK000535-02-03, NU50CK000535-02-06, NU50CK000535-03-00, NU50CK000535-03-01, NU50CK000535-03-02, NU50CK000535-04-00, NU50CK000535-05-00, NU50CK000535-05-07, NU50CK000535-05-08, NU50CK000535-05-12 Federal Award Year: 2023, 2024 Compliance Category: Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The Department is required to prepare and submit complete, accurate, and supportable Federal Financial Reports (FFRs, SF425) for Assistance Listing 93.323 in accordance with the grant award terms, the HHS Grants Policy Statement, and 2 CFR 200.302 and 200.333, including maintaining adequate supporting documentation and subsidiary schedules to substantiate amounts reported and to demonstrate proper cutoff of reporting periods. Internal policies and procedures should ensure that all amounts reported on the SF425 are reconciled to the underlying accounting records and retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements. Condition: Supporting schedules to substantiate the reported amounts for Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 93.323 were not available for two of the six (33%) SF‑425 FFRs selected for testing. Known cutoff issues related to financial reporting were also reported in SA‑01 [finding #2024-103], which further affects the accuracy and completeness of the reporting for this program. Additionally, the Department did not retain adequate documentation to support its FFRs for ALN 93.323, resulting in an incomplete audit trail for the amounts reported. Cause and Effect: The Department’s existing procedures for preparing and retaining supporting schedules for SF425 reports under ALN 93.323 were not consistently followed to ensure all supporting documentation was retained. In addition, controls over period end cutoff for reported expenditures and program income, as noted in SA01 [finding #2024-102], were not operating effectively for this program. As a result, two of six SF425 reports tested for ALN 93.323 not fully supported by underlying schedules, and known cutoff issues increase the risk that amounts reported on the FFRs may be incomplete, inaccurate, or misstated. These weaknesses diminish the reliability of the audit trail, impair management’s ability to demonstrate compliance with federal reporting requirements, and increases the likelihood of questioned costs or future compliance findings. Recommendation: The Department should strengthen its internal controls over the preparation and retention of SF‑425 reports for ALN 93.323 by establishing and documenting standardized procedures that require the preparation of reconciled supporting schedules for each FFR, including clear cutoff procedures that reconcile reported amounts to the general ledger and grant sub‑ledgers for the applicable reporting period; requiring an independent review of each SF‑425 and its supporting schedules prior to submission to verify mathematical accuracy, proper cutoff, and agreement to the accounting records; implementing a centralized document‑retention process to ensure that all supporting schedules and related documentation for submitted FFRs are retained in accordance with federal and Department record‑retention requirements; and providing periodic training to staff responsible for grants accounting and reporting on the revised procedures and retention requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) Contact Person: Kimberly Courtney, Director of Accounting Anticipated Completion Date: 6/30/26 Management Response: The Oklahoma State Department of Health agrees with the finding. Please see the corrective action plan located in the corrective action plan section of this report.

Reference Number: 2024-005 Federal Program Title: Medicaid Cluster / Medical Assistance Program Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.778 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Health Care Services Federal Award Number and Year: N/A Name of County Department: Health and Human Services Category of Finding: Reporting Instance of Noncompliance and Material Weakness Criteria 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management (a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award 2 CFR § 200.303 states that the non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The California Department of Health Care Services (State) requires that quarterly administrative expense claims (invoices) be submitted within 60 days of the quarter end and any supplemental claims and revision within six months of the fiscal year end and use the appropriate invoice template provided to the Counties by the State. Condition We selected 10 quarterly administrative expense claims submitted during fiscal year 2024 and noted the following: FY Quarter Program* Due Date Date Submitted Days Late 2024 1 HCPCFC (PMMO) 11/30/2023 12/20/2023 20 2024 1 CHDP 11/30/2023 12/19/2023 19 2024 1 CCS 11/30/2023 1/8/2024 39 2024 1 CCS 11/30/2023 5/24/2024 176 2024 2 CCS 2/28/2024 5/24/2024 86 * CHDP - Child Health and Disability Prevention HCPCFC - Health Care Program for Children in Foster Care HCPCFC (PMMO) - Health Care Program for Children in Foster Care - (Psychotropic Medication Monitoring and Oversight) CCS - California Children Services Program We also noted that two of the reports reviewed had clerical errors in the claim templates in the period dates, creating confusion regarding the reporting period to which the claims related. There were instances in which the period dates were incorrect throughout the claims and instances in which the dates were not consistent across all pages of the claims. Cause The County’s Health and Human Services Department does not have a formal process to monitor and track reporting deadlines or maintain documentation if communications were made with the grantor regarding the need for an extension. The department has experienced staffing constraints leading to delays in preparing, reviewing, and filing reports for the CHDP and HCPCFC programs. Effect Untimely submission of reports may result in funding delays and potential denial of funding by the grantor if the fiscal year’s six-month deadline is exceeded. In addition, insufficient review of report content, such as covered periods and accuracy of the invoice template may create confusion, further delay the receipt of funding, result in inaccurate amounts being claimed and extend the time necessary to resolve discrepancies during subsequent audits. Questioned Costs None identified. Context We identified 20 administrative expense claims filed in fiscal year 2024. This included eight claims related to the prior fiscal year that were filed significantly after the applicable deadlines. We selected 10 of the 20 claims for review. Identification as a Report Finding Previously reported as Finding 2023-004. The sample was not a statistically valid sample. Recommendation We recommend the County consider the following: 1. Establish a tracking system to identify all reports and their respective due dates. 2. Communicate with the grantor if required reports are expected to be submitted late and maintain correspondence. 3. Review employee responsibilities and workloads to properly allocate resources to support compliance needs.

CASH MANAGEMENT – CASH DRAWS Repeat of finding 2022-003, 2023-006 Finding Type: Material Weakness in Internal Controls over Compliance, Material Noncompliance ALN Program Title: 93.676 – Unaccompanied Alien Children Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Liberty Wilderness Crossroads Camp Contract Number: 90ZU0501 Criteria: Under 2 CFR 200.305(b) of the Uniform Guidance, non-federal entities “must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds from the United States Treasury or the pass-through entity and the disbursement by the non-federal entity whether the payment is made by electronic funds transfer, or issuance or redemption of checks, warrants, or payment by other means.” Under 2 CFR 200.305(b)(5) of the Uniform Guidance, “To the extent available, the non-federal entity must disburse funds available from program income (including repayments to a revolving fund), rebates, refunds, contract settlements, audit recoveries, and interest earned on such funds before requesting additional cash payments.” Under 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) of the Uniform Guidance, the Organization’s financial management system must provide for “written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305.” Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303(a) of the Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Condition: While the Organization did not draw cash in excess of program disbursements for the grant that was in effect during the current year, the Organization had previously drawn cash in excess of program disbursements under a grant that ended in the prior year so the Organization started and ended the year with a material balance of unspent grant funds for the program. Additionally, the Organization did not have written cash management policies and there was no process established for reviewing the pay requests prepared prior to submission. Cause: Policies and procedures were not in place to ensure that the time elapsing between the transfer of federal funds to the Organization and the disbursement of such funds for program purposes was minimized. In addition, policies and procedures were not in place to ensure that additional cash draws were not requested prior to disbursing all available funds for program related purposes. Effect: Overall program funds were drawn in excess of disbursements. The Organization could be required to return the excess funds to the grantor along with any associated earned interest. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: We recommend that written policies and procedures be established to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305, and recommend procedures be established for review of the cash draw requests prior to submission and that the review be documented. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: See management’s response and Corrective Action Plan on page 55.

2024-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2023 - 05/31/2024 10CH010945-05 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2023 - 06/30/2024 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-04 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, accrued liabilities, operating right of use assets and lease obligations, property and equipment, grant revenue, in-kind, and net assets with donor restrictions. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Repeat: Yes - Years as repeat finding: Five 2023-001 Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.

2024-001: Reconciliations and Material Adjustments Questioned Costs: None How the questioned costs were computed: N/A Grant Funding Source Grant Period Head Start U.S. Department of Health 06/01/2023 - 05/31/2024 10CH010945-05 and Human Services Early Head Start U.S. Department of Health 07/01/2023 - 06/30/2024 Child Care Partnerships and Human Services 10HP000422-04 Condition: At the time of audit fieldwork, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. had not reconciled all account balances. As a result, Wipfli, LLP proposed and management posted adjusting journal entries to contributions receivable, grants receivable, refundable advance, accrued liabilities, operating right of use assets and lease obligations, property and equipment, grant revenue, in-kind, and net assets with donor restrictions. As Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls did not discover these adjustments prior to our audit, a material weakness exists in Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting. Criteria: Federal Regulation 2 CFR 200.302(4) requires that an organization have…Effective control over, and accountability for, all funds, property, and other assets. Cause: During the audit year, Umatilla-Morrow Head Start, Inc. experienced turnover in its business office which contributed to the lack of timely reconciliations, review of reconciliations performed, and subsequent adjustments to account balances. Repeat: Yes - Years as repeat finding: Five 2023-001 Effect: As a result of the lack of segregation of duties surrounding bank reconciliations and not reconciling all account balances resulting in subsequent adjustments to accounts, a material weakness exists in internal controls over financial reporting. Recommendation: Accounts should be reconciled monthly with the adjustments posted timely so that management is relying on accurate financial information to make decisions. We recommend management and those charged with governance evaluate the operation of the business office and implement adequate and timely closing procedures to ensure that financial statement amounts are being reconciled, reviewed, and adjusted in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the assessment and subsequent to year end, steps were taken to correct the matter.

#2024-001: Grant Program: Department of Health and Human Services – National Institutes for Health Research and Development Cluster – Cancer Control – Assistance Listing #93.399 – Lack of Required Written Policies Condition: The Consortium does not have written policies and procedures in place as required by 2 CFR § 200.302 and § 200.313. Specifically, the Consortium lacks documented policies for: • The timing of federal cash draws; • The allowability of costs charged to federal awards; and • Documentation of time-and-effort for personal services. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(6)–(7) requires nonfederal entities to have written procedures for (a) cash drawdowns and (b) determining cost allowability. § 200.305 requires written cash-management procedures that minimize the time between draw and disbursement. § 200.430 requires a written policy that is consistently applied to both federal and nonfederal activities for documentation of compensation for personal services. Context: At the time of completion of the audit for the year ended May 31, 2024, the written policies were not in place. Cause: The Consortium has not yet developed or adopted the required written policies due to limited administrative capacity and reliance on informal practices. Effect: The absence of written policies increases the risk of noncompliance with federal requirements, mismanagement of federal funds, and audit findings in future periods. It may also impair the Consortium’s ability to consistently apply federal cost principles and properly safeguard assets. Recommendation: We recommend that the Consortium develop and implement written policies and procedures that comply with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Reporting Review and Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A WI DHS Contract Number: 435100-G24-226233-490 Profile ID #: 155043 Name of State Program: WI Primary Care 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. The State Award is passed through from the Federal government and is required to follow the Uniform Guidance as well. Management’s grant tracking for Federal Awards were not properly updated or reviewed and approved during the year. Due to staff turnover during the year, Management was unable to provide the general ledger information that reconciles to the grant cost reimbursement requests submitted to the funding sources. In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation that information submitted to the funding sources was reviewed and approved. There is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Reporting Review and Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A WI DHS Contract Number: 435100-G24-226233-490 Profile ID #: 155043 Name of State Program: WI Primary Care 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. The State Award is passed through from the Federal government and is required to follow the Uniform Guidance as well. Management’s grant tracking for Federal Awards were not properly updated or reviewed and approved during the year. Due to staff turnover during the year, Management was unable to provide the general ledger information that reconciles to the grant cost reimbursement requests submitted to the funding sources. In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation that information submitted to the funding sources was reviewed and approved. There is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal and State Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Expenditure Documentation & Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation such as invoices or receipts for 4 out of 25 transactions for the Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers program (ALN # 93.129). In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation of the related reviews and approvals of those expenditures. The extrapolated error is not material to the major programs, and is below the questioned costs threshold. However, there is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal and State Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Expenditure Documentation & Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation such as invoices or receipts for 4 out of 25 transactions for the Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers program (ALN # 93.129). In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation of the related reviews and approvals of those expenditures. The extrapolated error is not material to the major programs, and is below the questioned costs threshold. However, there is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Condition: Out of the 36 grant drawdowns during the year, of the 15 drawdowns that were tested, 3 of the drawdowns were made in advance of the supporting invoices being paid and subsequently the invoices were not paid within the 72-hours, as required. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 15 grant drawdowns from the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the drawdowns and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements. Criteria: The U.S. Treasury per 2 CFR section 200.305 (2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) requires grant funds received by the Authority to be properly spent within 72 hours of receipt. HUD regulations require that proper documentation be maintained for all Capital Fund Program per 24 CFR 905.326. Cause: The Authority experienced staff turnover in the finance department as well as difficulty replacing personnel knowledgeable with HUD and grant reporting requirements. Effect: The Authority did not disburse the capital funds in a timely manner for some of the draws made during the year. Questioned Costs: $379,570 Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over grant management to coordinate capital fund draws with the timing of invoice payments. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Reporting Review and Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A WI DHS Contract Number: 435100-G24-226233-490 Profile ID #: 155043 Name of State Program: WI Primary Care 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. The State Award is passed through from the Federal government and is required to follow the Uniform Guidance as well. Management’s grant tracking for Federal Awards were not properly updated or reviewed and approved during the year. Due to staff turnover during the year, Management was unable to provide the general ledger information that reconciles to the grant cost reimbursement requests submitted to the funding sources. In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation that information submitted to the funding sources was reviewed and approved. There is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Reporting Review and Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A WI DHS Contract Number: 435100-G24-226233-490 Profile ID #: 155043 Name of State Program: WI Primary Care 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. The State Award is passed through from the Federal government and is required to follow the Uniform Guidance as well. Management’s grant tracking for Federal Awards were not properly updated or reviewed and approved during the year. Due to staff turnover during the year, Management was unable to provide the general ledger information that reconciles to the grant cost reimbursement requests submitted to the funding sources. In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation that information submitted to the funding sources was reviewed and approved. There is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal and State Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Expenditure Documentation & Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation such as invoices or receipts for 4 out of 25 transactions for the Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers program (ALN # 93.129). In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation of the related reviews and approvals of those expenditures. The extrapolated error is not material to the major programs, and is below the questioned costs threshold. However, there is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Federal and State Programs Inadequate Internal Controls over Financial Management in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance – Expenditure Documentation & Approval Assistance Listing Number: 93.129 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: N/A 2 CFR §200.302 Financial Management: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.302 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. - All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal Statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal Award. -Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal Awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Management was unable to provide supporting documentation such as invoices or receipts for 4 out of 25 transactions for the Technical and Non-Financial Assistance to Health Centers program (ALN # 93.129). In addition, Management was unable to provide supporting documentation of the related reviews and approvals of those expenditures. The extrapolated error is not material to the major programs, and is below the questioned costs threshold. However, there is an increased risk that the Organization could potentially charge unallowable costs to Federal or State Awards. In addition, there is an increased risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements or the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards may not be prevented, or detected and corrected, in a timely manner. WHPCA hired a new third party accountant after the end of the fiscal year and has been working with the new accountant to implement additional monitoring and review and approval procedures. We recommend that WHPCA continues this process to strengthen its internal controls. No Staff at WHPCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. WHPCA has hired a third-party accountant as well as implemented additional monitoring and review and approval procedures to strengthen its financial management.

Condition: Out of the 36 grant drawdowns during the year, of the 15 drawdowns that were tested, 3 of the drawdowns were made in advance of the supporting invoices being paid and subsequently the invoices were not paid within the 72-hours, as required. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 15 grant drawdowns from the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the drawdowns and supporting documentation to ensure proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements. Criteria: The U.S. Treasury per 2 CFR section 200.305 (2 CFR section 200.302(b)(6)) requires grant funds received by the Authority to be properly spent within 72 hours of receipt. HUD regulations require that proper documentation be maintained for all Capital Fund Program per 24 CFR 905.326. Cause: The Authority experienced staff turnover in the finance department as well as difficulty replacing personnel knowledgeable with HUD and grant reporting requirements. Effect: The Authority did not disburse the capital funds in a timely manner for some of the draws made during the year. Questioned Costs: $379,570 Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over grant management to coordinate capital fund draws with the timing of invoice payments. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan

2024-012 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Material Weakness This is a repeat finding. The prior-year’s auditing finding number is 2023-012. Condition: A weakness existed in the overall reconciliation/tie-in procedures performed over the Housing Authority’s financial statement accounts for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024. Financial accounts were not reconciled on a timely, monthly basis. The major areas where reconciliation procedures were weak included: A) Bank Reconciliations B) Grant Receivables C) Account Receivables and associated allowance for doubtful accounts D) Capital Assets E) Accounts Payable F) Payroll and Other Current Liabilities Criteria: OMB Uniform Guidance states the following in section 200.302, “(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.327 Financial reporting and 200.328 Monitoring and reporting program performance. Cause: Lack of written policies and procedures over financial tie-in procedures that identify who is responsible for performing these tie-in/reconciliation procedures. Effect: In the course of performing the audit, the auditor recommended 4 adjusting journal entries be made to the financial statements for fiscal year ending March 31, 2024. Many of these adjustments could have been avoided if timely reconciliation and tie-in procedures had been conducted by the finance department. Many of these audit adjustments were material in nature. Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written reconciliation and tie-in procedures into its financial policies and procedures manual. These policies should require timely reconciliations to take place as defined under policy. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

2023-003 U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there were two instances in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2023 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2023 Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.

2023-003 U.S. Department of Transportation – AL #20.106 Airport Improvement Program – Reporting Grant Award: 3-38-0022-064-2022 Criteria The Authority is required to submit payment requests using the DOT Electronic Grants payment system, Delphi e-Invoicing. These requests must meet the standards described in 2 CFR ss 200.302 and 200.305. Condition During review of submitted Request for Reimbursements and Outlay reports, it was noted that one request submitted was not accurately prepared as there were two instances in which the amount requested was greater than invoice documentation, additionally the request included a request for reimbursement of AIP ineligible costs. As of December 31, 2023 no funds have been returned to U.S. DOT. Questioned Costs N/A Context We reviewed the project financial summary for two of the 19 requests submitted during 2023 Cause Employee oversight. Effect The Authority could have had federal funding delayed or reduced. Recommendation We recommend that the Authority implement internal controls to ensure all reporting is accurately filed. Repeat Finding This is not a repeat finding. Views of Responsible Officials Management recognizes the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Criteria or specific requirement: According to §200.302 Financial management of 2 CFR Part 200, MTW Agencies must ensure that housing assisted under the demonstration program meets housing quality standards established or approved by the secretary. The HCV program regulations at 24 CFR sections 982.401 through 982.405 set forth basic housing quality standards (HQS) which all units must meet, and the PHA must verify by inspection, before initial assistance can be paid on behalf of a family and at least annually throughout the term of the assisted tenancy. Current HQS regulations consist of 13 key aspects of housing quality, performance requirements, and acceptability criteria to meet each performance requirement. HQS include requirements for all housing types, including single and multi-family dwelling units, as well as specific requirements for special housing types, such as manufactured homes, congregate housing, single room occupancy, shared housing, and group residences (Section 204(c)(3)(E) of Pub. L. No. 104-134 (42 USC 1437f (note))). Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Condition: During the testing of 40 HCV files selected, we noted 1 of the 40 tenant files did not have an inspection completed on the unit within the established timeline of the Authority’s policy. Questioned costs: $30,000 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 contained errors as noted above. Per the HCVP Administrative Plan, the Authority is required to inspect tenant units no less than every 26 months. Cause: There was an issue with Yardi and the notice letters that outlined deficiencies were printing out incorrect mailing information. This resulted in the housing provider not being properly notified of the deficiencies, so as a result the Authority could not abate until the housing provider received proper notice. Effect: The auditor noted an instance of noncompliance. Noncompliance results in possible over charges to the grant. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority review their process and internal controls over HQS inspections to ensure compliance with HUD requirements and their administrative plan. Furthermore, management should ensure no HAP payments are issued for units that have not passed HQS housing inspections. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Federal Programs Lack of Fiscal Policies and Procedures in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance Assistance Listing Number: 93.328 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. 2 CFR§200.302(b)(6-7) Financial Management: - Written procedures are required to implement the requirements of §200.305. - Written procedures are required for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.WHCA’s written policies and procedures lack some of the requirements required by the Code of Federal Regulations. There is an increased risk that the Association could potentially charge unallowable costs to federal awards or be noncompliant with other areas of the Code of Federal Regulations. We recommend the Association create formal written fiscal policies and procedures that conform to the uniform guidance. No Staff at the WHCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. The Executive Director, Vice President of Workforce Development, and the Director of Administration & Association completed a certification course on Federal allowable costs. In managing the federal awards, staff references this knowledge to guide the spending of the award.

Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Federal Programs Lack of Fiscal Policies and Procedures in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance Assistance Listing Number: 93.328 Name of Federal Program or Cluster: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Name of Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Name of Pass-Through Entities: State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. 2 CFR§200.302(b)(6-7) Financial Management: - Written procedures are required to implement the requirements of §200.305. - Written procedures are required for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E of this part and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.WHCA’s written policies and procedures lack some of the requirements required by the Code of Federal Regulations. There is an increased risk that the Association could potentially charge unallowable costs to federal awards or be noncompliant with other areas of the Code of Federal Regulations. We recommend the Association create formal written fiscal policies and procedures that conform to the uniform guidance. No Staff at the WHCA are dedicated to adhering to the regulations. The Executive Director, Vice President of Workforce Development, and the Director of Administration & Association completed a certification course on Federal allowable costs. In managing the federal awards, staff references this knowledge to guide the spending of the award.

FINDING 2023-001 Subject: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds - Reporting Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listings Number: 21.027 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): ILBC-2023-Body Camera-00052 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Department of Homeland Security Compliance Requirement: Reporting Audit Findings: Material Weakness, Other Matters INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 13 KOSCIUSKO COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) Condition and Context The County Sheriff applied for the Indiana Local Body Camera Grant (ILBC). The grant is a reimbursable grant through the Indiana Department of Homeland Security. The County Sheriff was awarded this grant on January 1, 2023, with a grant cost amount of up to $31,920 to be spent from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. The County Sheriff ordered body-worn cameras and other equipment on April 26, 2023. A Reimbursement Claim Form (Form) was submitted for the cameras and other equipment on September 11, 2023. The Form shows the County Sheriff requested the full $31,920; however, the County had only spent $9,581 from the grant fund towards the purchase. The reimbursement of $31,920 from the Indiana Department of Homeland Security was received on September 27, 2023. The fund had a balance of $22,339 as of December 31, 2023. As there are no grant expenditures for the remaining reimbursements received and the period of performance had ended, the County should have reimbursed the Indiana Department of Homeland Security $22,339. On May 9, 2023, the County Sheriff's grant administrator submitted a Program Report for the ILBC grant. The report was completed and submitted by the County Sheriff's grant administrator without a documented oversight or review process to ensure the completeness and accuracy of the report. The report incorrectly indicated that all expenditures had been completed. However, as of the date of the submission, the County had not purchased the body-worn cameras, and all federal funds had not been expended. The lack of internal controls and noncompliance were systemic issues throughout the audit period. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." 2 CFR 200.302(b) states in part: "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following . . . (2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements set forth in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. . . ." 34 CFR 76.722 states: "A State may require a subgrantee to submit reports in a manner and format that assists the State in complying with the requirements under 34 CFR 76.720 and in carrying out other responsibilities under the program." INDIANA STATE BOARD OF ACCOUNTS 14 KOSCIUSKO COUNTY SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) 2 CFR 200.344(d) states in part: "The non-Federal entity must promptly refund any balances of unobligated cash that the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity paid in advance or paid and that are not authorized to be retained by the non-Federal entity for use in other projects. . . ." Cause A proper system of internal controls, which would include segregation of key functions, was not designed by management of the County to ensure the accuracy of the reimbursement invoice and the Program Report. Embedded within a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consisting of policies and procedures. Policies reflect the County's management statements of what should be done to effect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies. Effect Without the proper design or implementation of the components of a system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that provide segregation of duties and additional oversight as needed, the internal control system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance. As such, federal reimbursement was requested in excess of the amount spent. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended that management of the County establish a proper system of internal controls, including policies and procedures that would provide segregation of duties to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, and oversight are taking place to ensure reimbursement invoices are complete and accurate prior to submission. Furthermore, we recommended the County contact the awarding agency to discuss the funds remaining. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.

2023-002: U.S. Department of Environment Protection – Assistance Listing # 66.468 Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Cluster) Lack of Required Written Policies & Procedures – Compliance Condition & Criteria: The Authority does not currently have all the written policies and procedures in place as required by the Uniform Guidance as it relates to financial management and determining allowability of costs for the federal program (Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.302 & 200.305). In addition CFR sections 200.318, 200.319, and 200.320 require there to be written policies and procedures regarding procurement and conflicts of interest. Effect: Although not likely, the oversight agency could disallow all costs associated with this program. Cause: The Authority has not had any significant federal grant funding in many years. The current federal project is the first time that the Authority has been subject to the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. The Authority does have a set of informal policies and procedures that are followed as it relates to financial management, allowability of costs, procurement, and conflicts of interest, and have been very careful to carry out all federal program activities in accordance with established regulations; however, the Authority was not aware that the Uniform Guidance requires these policies and procedures be documented in writing.   Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority work towards getting those policies and procedures documented in writing so that they are in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Authority understands the potential effects of the condition described above and is currently consulting with their attorney to draft written policies and procedures as they relate to federal programs that are required by the Uniform Guidance.

SECTION III – FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2023-002 Material Weakness Reporting Criteria and Condition: While the Organization has some written financial management procedures documentation, it does not meet all the recent specific requirements under 2 CFR 200.302 in the Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: The financial management requirements under 2 CFR 200.302 require each non-federal entity maintain effective control over, and accountability for all funds, property, and other assets, including having written procedures in place. Key changes which effect the Organization include: • Increased documentation • Time and effort reporting for payroll • Specific purchasing consideration Cause: The Borough did not implement adequate controls to ensure compliance with this reporting requirement. Potential Effect: Errors could occur in financial reporting. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update its existing policies to comply with the requirements under 2 CFR 200.302. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the importance of defining and following the necessary policies and procedures to remain in compliance with the requirements under 2 CFR 200.302. Borough of Yardley will implement these policies and procedures to ensure that the organization will comply going forward. Repeat: Repeat finding from 2017-002 Action Taken: The Borough will review guidance and create missing policies. Anticipated Completion: During 2024.

SECTION III – FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2023-002 Material Weakness Reporting Criteria and Condition: While the Organization has some written financial management procedures documentation, it does not meet all the recent specific requirements under 2 CFR 200.302 in the Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: The financial management requirements under 2 CFR 200.302 require each non-federal entity maintain effective control over, and accountability for all funds, property, and other assets, including having written procedures in place. Key changes which effect the Organization include: • Increased documentation • Time and effort reporting for payroll • Specific purchasing consideration Cause: The Borough did not implement adequate controls to ensure compliance with this reporting requirement. Potential Effect: Errors could occur in financial reporting. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update its existing policies to comply with the requirements under 2 CFR 200.302. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the importance of defining and following the necessary policies and procedures to remain in compliance with the requirements under 2 CFR 200.302. Borough of Yardley will implement these policies and procedures to ensure that the organization will comply going forward. Repeat: Repeat finding from 2017-002 Action Taken: The Borough will review guidance and create missing policies. Anticipated Completion: During 2024.

SECTION III – FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2023-002 Material Weakness Reporting Criteria and Condition: While the Organization has some written financial management procedures documentation, it does not meet all the recent specific requirements under 2 CFR 200.302 in the Uniform Grant Guidance. Context: The financial management requirements under 2 CFR 200.302 require each non-federal entity maintain effective control over, and accountability for all funds, property, and other assets, including having written procedures in place. Key changes which effect the Organization include: • Increased documentation • Time and effort reporting for payroll • Specific purchasing consideration Cause: The Borough did not implement adequate controls to ensure compliance with this reporting requirement. Potential Effect: Errors could occur in financial reporting. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization update its existing policies to comply with the requirements under 2 CFR 200.302. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management understands the importance of defining and following the necessary policies and procedures to remain in compliance with the requirements under 2 CFR 200.302. Borough of Yardley will implement these policies and procedures to ensure that the organization will comply going forward. Repeat: Repeat finding from 2017-002 Action Taken: The Borough will review guidance and create missing policies. Anticipated Completion: During 2024.

SECTION III - FEDERAL AND STATE AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2023 – 002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 2023 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2023 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR 200.302 requires that "The financial management system of each non-Federal entity must provide for the following: (1) Identification, in its accounts, of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the AL title and number, Federal award identification number and year, name of the Federal agency, and name of the pass-through entity, if any." Grant claims filed by the County to the various granting agencies must be accurate, reconcile to the County general ledger system, and for cost-reimbursement grants, represent costs incurred. Internal controls should be designed and implemented to prevent and detect errors in the data reported on the grant claims. Segregation of duties is an internal control intended to prevent or decrease the occurrence of errors or intentional fraud. Segregation of duties ensures that no single employee has control over all phases of a transaction. Condition: There was no final formal review of the quarterly project & expenditure reports in comparison to the general ledger. Questioned costs: None Context: While performing audit procedures, it was noted that there was not a final formal review done of the quarterly project & expenditure reports in comparison to the general ledger. Cause: Due to the County not having a formal review process in place, the County under-reported 2023 expenditures to the U.S. Department of Treasury. Effect: The County could over- or under-report certain expenditures. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County review its processes and implement controls to formally review these quarterly reports and that they are compared and reconciled to the general ledger. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.