Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.
Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 200.302 (b)(3), the recipient must maintain records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation. Condition We selected 25 drawdowns across all agencies for testing. Of these 25, there was no evidence of supervisory review for 2 drawdown selections. Further, 1 drawdown selection was approved 1 day after the drawdown request was submitted. Cause During the audit period, the University experienced a transition in leadership within the Office of Research Administration. As part of this transition, the Associate Vice President for Research Administration was responsible for reviewing and approving drawdown requests, which was overlooked in certain instances. Effect The University processed drawdowns prior to supervisory approval. Questioned Costs None. Recommendation We recommend management revisit existing internal control procedures to ensure requested reimbursements are approved prior to the request Management’s Views and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included at the end of this report.