Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,459
In database
Filtered Results
53,473
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1323 of 2139
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 2023-005 - Special Tests and Provisions - SEMAP reporting ALN 14.871- Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency Corrective Action Plan: Training and procedures are being put in place for tenant file reviews and inspections. An experienced Executive Directo r has been hired who will ensure staf...
Finding 2023-005 - Special Tests and Provisions - SEMAP reporting ALN 14.871- Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency Corrective Action Plan: Training and procedures are being put in place for tenant file reviews and inspections. An experienced Executive Directo r has been hired who will ensure staff remain up to date with HUD compliance in order to ensure accurate reporting. Person Responsible: John Sales, Interim Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: per HUD ongoing for five years
Finding 2023-004 - Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files - Rent Calculations ALN 14.871- Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency Corrective Action Plan: Staff attended training Dec 2023. Process & procedures for Utility and other factor s are being put ln place. Person Responsible: John Sales, Interi...
Finding 2023-004 - Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files - Rent Calculations ALN 14.871- Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency Corrective Action Plan: Staff attended training Dec 2023. Process & procedures for Utility and other factor s are being put ln place. Person Responsible: John Sales, Interim Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: March 31, 2024
Finding 2023-003 - Documentation of Costs and Vendor Invoices - Financial Reporting and Internal Controls ALN 14.850 & 14.871- Noncompliance & Material Weakness Corrective Action Plan: Vendor invoice backup supplied to HUD for questionable expense s. Executive Director must approve all expenses goi...
Finding 2023-003 - Documentation of Costs and Vendor Invoices - Financial Reporting and Internal Controls ALN 14.850 & 14.871- Noncompliance & Material Weakness Corrective Action Plan: Vendor invoice backup supplied to HUD for questionable expense s. Executive Director must approve all expenses going forward and keep sufficient backup for audit. Person Responsible: John Sales, Interim Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: January 31, 2024
View Audit 297881 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-002 -Accounting Controls - Cash Management & Program Compliance ALN 14.850 - Grant years 2022, 2023 - Noncompliance & Material Weakness Corrective Action Plan: Accounting computer automation and hiring of experienced Executive Director and a Finance staff person who can follow HUD guid...
Finding 2023-002 -Accounting Controls - Cash Management & Program Compliance ALN 14.850 - Grant years 2022, 2023 - Noncompliance & Material Weakness Corrective Action Plan: Accounting computer automation and hiring of experienced Executive Director and a Finance staff person who can follow HUD guidelines and compliance should correct controls and record keeplng for the future. Person Responsible: John Sales, Interim Executive Director Anticipated completion Date: March 31,2024
Finding #2023-001 Prior Year Reporting Package and Data Collection Not Filed Timely: Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that reporting packages and data collection forms are filed timely in the future. Action taken: Stryker Homes Apartments agrees with the...
Finding #2023-001 Prior Year Reporting Package and Data Collection Not Filed Timely: Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures to ensure that reporting packages and data collection forms are filed timely in the future. Action taken: Stryker Homes Apartments agrees with the auditor’s recommendations and will implement procedures to ensure timely filing in the future. For questions regarding this corrective action plan, please contact Kyle Lyskawa, Chief Financial Officer, at (315) 424-1821.
Condition: The University did not have documented controls in place, reviewing that the comprehensive information security program was in compliance with the Safeguards Rule and was prepared and in place by June 9, 2023 Corrective Action Planned:The University will reevaluate procedures to ensure t...
Condition: The University did not have documented controls in place, reviewing that the comprehensive information security program was in compliance with the Safeguards Rule and was prepared and in place by June 9, 2023 Corrective Action Planned:The University will reevaluate procedures to ensure that all reports required under Uniform Guidance are reviewed, approved, documented, and retained in a timely manner. Name(s) of Contact Person(s) Responsible for Corrective Action: Richard Thomas, Senior Director of IT Informational Technology, and Paul Matson, CFO & VP of Finance
Finding 384754 (2023-014)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: From a sample of sixty providers, nine of the providers did not have a recertification survey completed within the required timeframe which is used to meet the provider health and safety standards. Recommendation: We recommend the State train all staff members to properly verify provide...
Condition: From a sample of sixty providers, nine of the providers did not have a recertification survey completed within the required timeframe which is used to meet the provider health and safety standards. Recommendation: We recommend the State train all staff members to properly verify providers are meeting the prescribed health and safety standards before making payments to those providers. Views of responsible officials: KDHE/Bureau of Facilities and Licensing (BFL) recognizes the recertification survey deadlines was not met for nine of the sixty non-deemed acute and continuing care providers and supplier types included in this audit consisting of Hospitals, Critical Access Hospitals (CAH), Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASC), End Stage Renal Disease Facilities (ESRD), Rural Health Clinics (RHC), Hospice and or Home Health Agencies (HHA). The KDHE/BFL would like to clarify that Section 1865(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (the Act) permits providers and suppliers "accredited" or "deemed" by an approved national accreditation organization (AO) to be exempt from routine surveys by State survey agencies to determine compliance with Medicare conditions. Accreditation by an AO is voluntary and is not required for Medicare certification or participation in the Medicare Program.) There is no disagreement with the audit finding but KDHE/BFL does want to identify some of the challenges the State Survey Agency (SSA) faces hindering continued progress with corrective action plans. CMS’s annual appropriation to the SSA has remained unchanged since FY 2015. This has significantly limited the SSA’s capacity to conduct initial, complaint, recertification, and validation surveys. This limitation in funding, coupled with the continuing effects of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), accelerated the loss of SSA surveyor resources and resulted in an ongoing survey backlog. As complaints about provider and supplier quality of care increases, non-statutory recertification surveys and less severe complaint allegations receive a lower priority. Complaint surveys, especially those alleging immediate jeopardy or actual harm to patient health and safety are the primary oversight provided, outside of statutory recertification surveys. These investigations of the most serious allegations also lead to more severe findings, higher numbers of revisits, and additional enforcement workload. Complaint surveys are the primary oversight mechanism for most provider types. CMS has established the following priorities for the SSA’s: 1. Investigation of patient complaints, as these are active quality concerns that must be reviewed to protect the health and safety of the public. 2. Survey and recertification of statutory facilities such as home health agencies (HHAs), and hospices as required by current law; and 3. Survey and recertification of non-statutory facilities, as required by CMS policy with consideration of available funding once priorities one and two have been accomplished. Action taken in response to finding: At the beginning of each federal fiscal year including current FFY24, the BFL utilizes the CMS Mission and Priority Document (MPD) which directs and outlines the work of the SA based on regulatory changes, adjustments in budget allocations, and new initiatives, as well as new requirements based on statutes to prioritize and categorize survey plans. During this current FFY we have begun to restructure the program adding additional program manager positions, health facility surveyors, contracted services, and other support staff. Our goal is always to be able to consistently meet our Tier 1 priority with an emphasis on Tier 2. Recruitment, training, fiscal management & strategies are always a priority and part of action plans to meet these goals. The SSA goals for FFY24: • Complete 100% of the ESRD surveys in Tier 2 provided on the required Outcomes List. Kansas currently has approximately 60 non-deemed ESRD suppliers. • Complete to the extent possible 5% of non-deemed RHCs based on state judgment prioritizing those RHCs most at risk of quality problems for Tier 2. Kansas currently has approximately 135 RHC suppliers. • Complete to the extent possible based on the state’s judgement prioritizing those at risk of quality problems a standard recertification survey with a maximum interval between surveys for any one particular HHA of 36.9 months to meet Tier 1 requirements. Kansas currently has approximately 70 non-deemed, certified HHA’s. • Complete to the extent possible based on the state’s judgement prioritizing those at risk of quality problems a standard recertification survey with a maximum interval between surveys for any one particular Hospice of 36 months to meet Tier 1 requirements. Kansas currently has approximately 50 non-deemed, certified Hospice providers • Complete to the extent possible based on the state’s judgement prioritizing those at risk of quality problems a standard recertification survey at least one, but not less than 5% of the non-deemed hospitals, 5% of the non-deemed psychiatric hospitals, and 5% of non-deemed CAHs. Kansas currently has approximately 74 non-deemed CAHs, 2 Psychiatric/Rehab non-deemed hospitals and 12 non-deemed hospitals. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jerry Smith, Bureau Director, Bureau of Facilities and Licensing, KDHE, Gerald.Smith@ks.gov Marilyn St Peter, RN, Deputy Director, Bureau of Facilities and Licensing, KDHE, Marilyn.St.Peter@ks.gov Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2024
Condition: Management did not track, determine or monitor the audit verification requirement for any subrecipients. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for monitoring of annual audits for subrecipients. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with th...
Condition: Management did not track, determine or monitor the audit verification requirement for any subrecipients. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for monitoring of annual audits for subrecipients. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Effective immediately, audit letters will be sent to all subrecipients without regard to monetary thresholds. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Deal Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 1, 2024
Condition: Subaward agreements with subrecipients, including Assistance Listing Number (ALN) and title, subrecipient’s DUNS/UEI number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is research and development, and indirect cost rate for federal award, were not incl...
Condition: Subaward agreements with subrecipients, including Assistance Listing Number (ALN) and title, subrecipient’s DUNS/UEI number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is research and development, and indirect cost rate for federal award, were not included. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for communicating information to subrecipients and implement the procedures necessary to ensure information is included in the subrecipient award documents at time of funding. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: KDEM is implementing a comprehensive compliance program. The program will oversee that appropriate communication is made to subrecipients as required to be in compliance with 2 CFR 200.331(a). Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Deal Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 1, 2024
Condition: During testing, we noted that FFATA reports were not submitted timely, FFATA reports were not submitted at all, and there was not a documented review of the submitted reports Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Element...
Condition: During testing, we noted that FFATA reports were not submitted timely, FFATA reports were not submitted at all, and there was not a documented review of the submitted reports Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 33 14 33 14 not reported 14 not reported Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements $2,775,992 $961,031 $2,775,992 $961,031 Not Reported $961,031 Not Reported Recommendation: We recommend that the agency implement controls to ensure subrecipients provide a UEI number before the subaward is entered into and implement procedures to ensure reports are submitted timely and formally reviewed. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: KDEM is implementing a comprehensive compliance program. The program will oversee that the completed application is received which includes the UEI. The compliance officer will then ensure that all FFATA reporting is completed and documented timely. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jennifer Deal Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 1, 2024
Finding 384749 (2023-010)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: During testing, we noted that FFATA reports were not submitted timely and there was not a documented review of the submitted reports. Also, we noted that the State also has submitted FFATA Reports to FSRS for vendors when this reporting is not required for vendors. Transactions Tested Su...
Condition: During testing, we noted that FFATA reports were not submitted timely and there was not a documented review of the submitted reports. Also, we noted that the State also has submitted FFATA Reports to FSRS for vendors when this reporting is not required for vendors. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 6 0 6 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements $2,291,464 $0 $2,291,464 0 0 Recommendation: We recommend that the agency implement controls to ensure reports are reviewed before submission, that a process is updated to ensure that reports are submitted timely, and that a process is implemented to ensure only subawards are reported to FSRS. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The agency has put a review/approval workflow process in place for reports. The report will be entered into FSRS.gov and sent to a reviewer. Once the report has been reviewed and approved, an email will be sent to Fiscal Analyst as proof the reports have been reviewed/approved. The email will be retained for audit reviews. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Joy Duncan Planned completion date for corrective action plan: The review process will begin immediately in March 2024.
Finding 384747 (2023-009)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: During testing it was discovered that management did not document the review of the submitted reports. Also, we noted that the State also has submitted FFATA Reports to FSRS for vendors when this reporting is not required for vendors. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not T...
Condition: During testing it was discovered that management did not document the review of the submitted reports. Also, we noted that the State also has submitted FFATA Reports to FSRS for vendors when this reporting is not required for vendors. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 1 0 0 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements $41,680 0 0 0 0 Recommendation: We recommend that the agency implement controls to ensure reports are reviewed before submission and that a process is implemented to ensure only subawards are reported to FSRS. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The agency has put a review/approval workflow process in place for reports. The report will be entered into FSRS.gov and sent to a reviewer. Once the report has been reviewed and approved, an email will be sent to Fiscal Analyst as proof the reports have been reviewed/approved. The email will be retained for audit reviews. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Joy Duncan Planned completion date for corrective action plan: The review process will begin immediately in March 2024.
Finding 384745 (2023-008)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: During our testing of twenty-seven covered transactions (twelve vendors and fifteen subrecipients), we noted that management was not able to provide supporting documentation for one vendor that suspension and debarment procedures were performed before the start of the procurement contract...
Condition: During our testing of twenty-seven covered transactions (twelve vendors and fifteen subrecipients), we noted that management was not able to provide supporting documentation for one vendor that suspension and debarment procedures were performed before the start of the procurement contract. Recommendation: We recommend the agency either obtain certifications from vendors stating their organization is not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in federal assistance programs or document the procedures performed to verify the vendor is not identified as suspended or debarred on the SAM website. We recommend that the agency have proper procedures in place to ensure that all contractual documentation is maintained and able to be located. Views of responsible officials: Management disagrees with the audit finding. Verification is completed at the time the contract is signed by KDHE so the date of signature corresponds with the date of SAM verification. Action taken in response to finding: KDHE has implemented a new contract system which will include steps for verifying suspension and debarment status for all contracts and sub-recipient agreements which KDHE is a party to. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Kelly Chilson Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 2023
Condition: During our testing, we noted subrecipients had required information omitted from the sub agreements to the subrecipients including Assistance Listing Number (ALN) and title, subrecipient’s DUNS/UEI number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is ...
Condition: During our testing, we noted subrecipients had required information omitted from the sub agreements to the subrecipients including Assistance Listing Number (ALN) and title, subrecipient’s DUNS/UEI number, Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), identification of whether the award is R&D, and indirect cost rate for federal award. Recommendation: We recommend that the agency review its procedures for communicating information to subrecipients and implement the procedures necessary to ensure information is included in the subrecipient award documents at time of funding. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: A cover sheet with the required information to be provided to the subrecipients has been created. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Program personnel Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Implementation will begin immediately in March 2024.
Finding 384741 (2023-006)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: During our testing of performance reports, we noted five out the five tested reports lacked documentation of review. Recommendation: We recommend the agency implement procedures to ensure reports are properly reviewed as well as increase training efforts on reporting requirements if ther...
Condition: During our testing of performance reports, we noted five out the five tested reports lacked documentation of review. Recommendation: We recommend the agency implement procedures to ensure reports are properly reviewed as well as increase training efforts on reporting requirements if there is future staffing turnover. Views of responsible officials: Management disagrees with the audit finding. There is review and final approval of these quarterly financial reports by the ELC program director prior to submission. The fiscal analyst at KDHE provides these financial reports to the ELC program manager and the ELC program director. The COVID and CORE ELC data from these reports are manually entered into ELC RedCap (for the years that correspond to this audit) and now ELC CAMP. COVID financial reports are then uploaded into GrantSolutions; the core ELC financial reports do not have to be uploaded to GrantSolutions. There is no mechanism to include a signature on these reports, but submission to ELC CAMP and GrantSolutions indicate the reports have been reviewed. Action taken in response to finding: An email advising reports have been reviewed and approved by the program director will be sent to the program manager as proof the reports have been reviewed/approved and are ready to be submitted. The email will be retained for audit reviews. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Sheri Tubach Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Immediately in March 2024.
Finding 384740 (2023-005)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: During testing of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports, it was noted that the reports were not filed timely or not filed at all for the fiscal year. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Ke...
Condition: During testing of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports, it was noted that the reports were not filed timely or not filed at all for the fiscal year. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 8 1 8 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements $ 6,046,626 $ 166,455 $ 6,046,626 $ 0 $ 0 Recommendation: We recommend that KDCF continue with the process implemented during the fiscal year, that includes tracking the timely submission of the FFATA reports. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: KDCF hired a dedicated person in May 2023 to complete the FFATA reporting process. This employee received access to the FSRS website in July 2023 and began entering the FFATA information for new awards. The information captured on the FFATA Checklist and FFATA-5 forms will be used to enter subrecipient information into the FSRS website. Previously, these forms were not always accurate in listing the correct FAIN and amount for each federal award. KDCF has revised this form to include a separate listing for each federal amount awarded and the information will be verified during the concurrence approval process for accuracy. Once concurrence has been completed and any corrections identified, the FFATA reporting details will be added to the FFATA tracking worksheet. KDCF has created a separate tracking worksheet for each state fiscal year which includes separate tabs for each DCF program. This information will be entered into the FSRS website in the reporting month of the award date under each FAIN identified within the required due date. The FFATA information entered will be reviewed on the USA Spending public site for accuracy and corrected as needed. KDCF staff will continue working on updating prior year FFATA information throughout the year identified in previous audits. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Brian Carlgren, Deputy Director of Fiscal Services Addie O’Connell, Grant and Contract Specialist Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 2024
Finding 384738 (2023-004)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: During testing of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report, it was noted that the one report tested was not filed timely. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 1 0 1 0 0 Dollar Amou...
Condition: During testing of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) report, it was noted that the one report tested was not filed timely. Transactions Tested Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements 1 0 1 0 0 Dollar Amount of Tested Transactions Subaward Not Reported Report Not Timely Subaward Amount Incorrect Subaward Missing Key Elements $ 5,850,379 $ 0 $ 5,850,379 $ 0 $ 0 Recommendation: We recommend that KDCF continue with the process implemented during the fiscal year, which includes tracking the timely submission of the FFATA reports. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: KDCF hired a dedicated person in May 2023 to complete the FFATA reporting process. This employee received access to the FSRS website in July 2023 and began entering the FFATA information for new awards. The information captured on the FFATA Checklist and FFATA-5 forms will be used to enter subrecipient information into the FSRS website. Previously, these forms were not always accurate in listing the correct FAIN and amount for each federal award. KDCF has revised this form to include a separate listing for each federal amount awarded and the information will be verified during the concurrence approval process for accuracy. Once concurrence has been completed and any corrections identified, the FFATA reporting details will be added to the FFATA tracking worksheet. KDCF has created a separate tracking worksheet for each state fiscal year which includes separate tabs for each DCF program. This information will be entered into the FSRS website in the reporting month of the award date under each FAIN identified within the required due date. The FFATA information entered will be reviewed on the USA Spending public site for accuracy and corrected as needed. KDCF staff will continue working on updating prior year FFATA information throughout the year identified in previous audits. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Brian Carlgren, Deputy Director of Fiscal Services Addie O’Connell, Grant and Contract Specialist Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 2024
Finding 384736 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: During testing of eligibility, the following items were noted: • Two beneficiaries had income entered incorrectly, causing the benefits to be overstated. • One beneficiary had income entered incorrectly but there was no impact on the benefit. • One beneficiary’s income was not entered for...
Condition: During testing of eligibility, the following items were noted: • Two beneficiaries had income entered incorrectly, causing the benefits to be overstated. • One beneficiary had income entered incorrectly but there was no impact on the benefit. • One beneficiary’s income was not entered for consideration, which caused the beneficiary to be incorrectly labeled as eligible. Recommendation: We recommend that KDCF strengthen internal controls in place to mitigate this from happening in the future. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Below are the determined causes for the identified errors. • Failure to review application and supporting documents prior to processing – Case #1 • Failure to double check information that was entered – Case #2 • Failure to review EDBC summary – Case #3 • Failure to adequately document income on the Application Worksheet – where they got income, listing income dates and amounts – Case #4 All causes identified are obviously human error related to lack of attention to detail. In each of the four cases identified, staff reviewed the eligibility determination and corrected as appropriate, including Recovery Accounts established and notices mailed to the household. Corrective action will involve review of training material to determine if there are opportunities to strengthen training material to enhance emphasis on attention to detail for staff receiving the training. Emphasize will also be placed on reviewing material before finalization of case processing to assure accuracy of determination. In addition, the agency is reviewing plans to move from a model that uses several temporary staff that complete only LIEAP eligibility to using full time EES eligibility staff that will do LIEAP in addition to all other EES caseloads. These workers do eligibility for several programs year-round and would not have to be retrained each year. We believe this will improve eligibility determinations and the review and approval process. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Lewis Kimsey, Public Service Executive Shannon Connell, Policy Coordination Assistant Director. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Training Material finalized by 10/1/24 and that training will be completed by Dec 31, 2024.
View Audit 297874 Questioned Costs: $1
a. Material Weakness - Paid Lunch Equity (NSLP) The District did not calculate its average paid lunch pricing requirement for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. b. LCSD7 Plan of Action - New staff hired in July of 2023 has received training from Oregon Department of Education on the calculation pr...
a. Material Weakness - Paid Lunch Equity (NSLP) The District did not calculate its average paid lunch pricing requirement for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. b. LCSD7 Plan of Action - New staff hired in July of 2023 has received training from Oregon Department of Education on the calculation process for paid lunch pricing. c. The Business Manager along with the Elementary Principal will ensure this process is complete in June 2024.
a. Material Weakness-Verification of Free and Reduced Price Applications The District did not select or verify a sample of applications that it approved for free and reduced price meals during 2022-2023. b. LCSD7 Plan of Action - New staff hired in July of 2023 has received training from Oregon Depa...
a. Material Weakness-Verification of Free and Reduced Price Applications The District did not select or verify a sample of applications that it approved for free and reduced price meals during 2022-2023. b. LCSD7 Plan of Action - New staff hired in July of 2023 has received training from Oregon Department of Education on the verification of application process. In January the District received a waiver and now can offer every student free meals. c. The Business Manager along with the Elementary Principal will ensure this process is complete in June 2024.
PRPHA has a provider with vast experience in this program and is currently serving other government authorities in the mainland that are entitled with this program. We have assured that they are following the regulations that are set forth by the Treasury Department. However, because of the shor...
PRPHA has a provider with vast experience in this program and is currently serving other government authorities in the mainland that are entitled with this program. We have assured that they are following the regulations that are set forth by the Treasury Department. However, because of the short period of time that we have had this program in Puerto Rico we have had to adapt the practices that have been adopted in the other agencies as the formal procedures as a start up implementation. We are establishing more procedures as the program evolves in the island. This is an on going action plan.
Cash Disbursements are made in accordance with cash management regulations and HUD requirements. However, we have additional layers of approvals as required by our HUD Field Office which depends on availabilty of outside personnel that is not under our control. Unexpected events such as COVID 19 eff...
Cash Disbursements are made in accordance with cash management regulations and HUD requirements. However, we have additional layers of approvals as required by our HUD Field Office which depends on availabilty of outside personnel that is not under our control. Unexpected events such as COVID 19 effect on employee assistance or different government workdays can affect our cash approvals at the bank level. We try to minimize and prevent these situations with a close coordination with the different approving officials . This is a recurring action plan.
Management of these programs were recently assigned to the Administration and procedures are being revised to ensure that certain process and eligilibility activities are incorporated in the current written guidelines. In addition, after restoring all normal practices after Covid 19 restriction re...
Management of these programs were recently assigned to the Administration and procedures are being revised to ensure that certain process and eligilibility activities are incorporated in the current written guidelines. In addition, after restoring all normal practices after Covid 19 restriction releases, the agency has restarted the Quality Control schedules to reinforce and audit the elegibility controls. The program completed a new Quality Control Procedure in April 2023 and has continued enforcing the monitoring of all the regional offices .
Reinforcement of the required documentation is being done frequently with the occupancy officers to request all the required documents in the kit provided to them as part of the procedures. The agency is providing continous training to the employees in order to streamline the processes, avoid mi...
Reinforcement of the required documentation is being done frequently with the occupancy officers to request all the required documents in the kit provided to them as part of the procedures. The agency is providing continous training to the employees in order to streamline the processes, avoid missing documents and ensure rent calculations are accurate. New procedures were revised as of 2020 when PRPHA started as new Section 8 receiving agency and is in the process of updating the current documentation.
Finding Number: 2023-002 Condition: SOMC Medical Care Foundation, Inc. (MCF) received $1.28M of ARP funding during period 4. As the recipient entity, MCF used the ARP funding in accordance with the terms and conditions, however the reporting on the use of MCF's ARP distributions was not properly c...
Finding Number: 2023-002 Condition: SOMC Medical Care Foundation, Inc. (MCF) received $1.28M of ARP funding during period 4. As the recipient entity, MCF used the ARP funding in accordance with the terms and conditions, however the reporting on the use of MCF's ARP distributions was not properly completed. The parent company, Southern Ohio Medical Center, completed a consolidated period 4 report, which is appropriate based on the reporting requirements, however the expenses that were reported for the use of the $1.28M received by MCF were expenses of the parent company, not expenses of MCF. Planned Corrective Action: The Management of Southern Ohio Medical Center (SOMC) and its subsidiaries are committed to complying with all terms, conditions, and reporting requirements related to funds received. Management will carefully read and follow all notices relating to reporting requirements and terms and conditions for each type of future funds awarded, paying particular attention to requirements as they pertain to Parent and Subsidiary reporting. In addition, SOMC will ensure that any and all updated guidance provided after the receipt of funds are reviewed and included in the application of used funds. Although SOMC incorrectly reported the use funds received for the subsidiary MCF on the consolidated period 4 report, it is important to note that the ARP funds were used and applied to more than $1.3m of lost revenue during the expense and lost revenue period. SOMC Management cannot amend the period 4 report to reflect this, but Management has updated the detailed internal records identifying the use of funds by applying $1.28m of MCF lost revenue to use of funds for the appropriate periods. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Kara Plummer, CFO Anticipated Completion Date: 3/31/2024
« 1 1321 1322 1324 1325 2139 »