Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,575
In database
Filtered Results
53,589
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1236 of 2144
25 per page

Filters

Clear
The Department of Health’s (DOH) Vaccine Preventable Disease Program (VPDP) is in compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) requirements with regard to reporting all active first-tier subawards of federal COVID-19 funds that DOH divisions have issued totaling $3...
The Department of Health’s (DOH) Vaccine Preventable Disease Program (VPDP) is in compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) requirements with regard to reporting all active first-tier subawards of federal COVID-19 funds that DOH divisions have issued totaling $30,000 or greater under this Cooperative Agreement and COVID-19 Supplemental. However, it is not in compliance with regard to reporting required subaward data in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which DOH has made the subawards totaling $30,000 or greater. The VPDP will continue to follow the DOH policy set forth in FMC 22-05 and report to FSRS all active first-tier subawards of federal COVID-19 funds DOH divisions have issued at $30,000 or greater under the COVID-19 Supplementals. The VPDP fiscal/grants leadership team will strive to ensure each of the identified subawards is entered on the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) website by the end of the month following the month that DOH has made the subawards. VPDP will continue its efforts to bring the gap in reporting to FSRS down from five months presently to within the specified FFATA submission deadlines denoted above. VPDP also has on boarded a full-time Contract Administrator 2 who will be responsible for reporting FFATA data into FSRS for the Immunization Cooperative Agreement. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON April 4, 2024 Susan Barcarola (609) 943-5302 Susan.Barcarola1@doh.nj.gov
Finding 393215 (2023-012)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The Division of Aging Services (DoAS) implemented the FFATA reporting process in June 2023; however, DoAS fell behind on timely submission of FFATA reports due to staffing constraints. To address this issue, the DoAS plans to hire a fiscal analyst dedicated to managing FFATA reporting. DoAS is plann...
The Division of Aging Services (DoAS) implemented the FFATA reporting process in June 2023; however, DoAS fell behind on timely submission of FFATA reports due to staffing constraints. To address this issue, the DoAS plans to hire a fiscal analyst dedicated to managing FFATA reporting. DoAS is planning to be up-to-date on FFATA reporting and timely submission within 90 days. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON June 30, 2024 Hetal Bhatt (609) 438-4586 Hetal.Bhatt2@dhs.nj.gov Dennis McGowan (609) 438-4739 Dennis.McGowan@dhs.nj.gov
The Division of Aging Services (DoAS) will comply with the pass-through entity and subrecipient monitoring requirements under the federal Uniform Guidance as per CFR § 200.332(a). The DoAS will provide all required information to the subrecipient at the time of award issuance. This subaward notice ...
The Division of Aging Services (DoAS) will comply with the pass-through entity and subrecipient monitoring requirements under the federal Uniform Guidance as per CFR § 200.332(a). The DoAS will provide all required information to the subrecipient at the time of award issuance. This subaward notice will be posted as a miscellaneous attachment to contracts in the Division's System for Administering Grants Electronically (SAGE), or via mail, fax or email to those subawards not administered in SAGE. DoAS plans to complete and update this information on SAGE within 60 days. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON May 31, 2024 Hetal Bhatt (609) 438-4586 Hetal.Bhatt2@dhs.nj.gov Dennis McGowan (609) 438-4739 Dennis.McGowan@dhs.nj.gov
Finding 393204 (2023-010)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) Office of Grants Management (OGM) understands the need to be compliant with FFATA reporting in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Internal controls and processes are in place to ensure NJDOE’s FFATA reporting process is working efficiently and timely...
The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) Office of Grants Management (OGM) understands the need to be compliant with FFATA reporting in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Internal controls and processes are in place to ensure NJDOE’s FFATA reporting process is working efficiently and timely. This noncompliance finding is not due to a lack of controls within NJDOE but lies squarely on system issues at SAM.gov and the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) sites and until the issues listed below are corrected on these federal system sites, NJDOE will continue to be noncompliant with timely FFATA reporting. Issues with the SAM.gov and FSRS sites: • SAM.gov has approved NJDOE’s local education agency (LEA) registrations without a ZIP+4, but FSRS reporting system for FFATA uploads requires ZIP+4 for each LEA. The two systems use the same database, which means information registered on SAM.gov feeds directly into the FSRS system. However, because FSRS batch uploads require a ZIP+4, those LEAs that were approved by SAM.gov without a ZIP+4 during the registration process, are rejected from the FFATA report batch upload. There is an option to manually load each LEA and their details into the system, but the process becomes incredibly time consuming, given the 700+ LEAs in the state, the number of federal awards granted, and the steps for identifying & removing rejected LEAs from the batch upload. • Issues NJDOE has with SAM.gov and FSRS have been shared with the federal helpdesk and a USED representative without avail, as the systematic issue remains unresolved and continues to delay our FFATA reporting process. • There are several rural LEAs in the state that do not have a ZIP+4. These LEAs will continue to be rejected from the batch upload, delaying our FFATA reporting process, if SAM.gov and FSRS do not come up with a viable solution. • There were a number of LEAs that were continuously rejected from the upload by FSRS for no obvious reasons. The error message received was the same exact error we receive for incorrect zip codes. After spending much time investigating the cause with the helpdesk support, it was identified that FSRS did not update their system to reflect the Congressional District code changes during New Jersey’s redistricting process. • The FSRS system rejects batch uploads if a single lower-case SAM UEIs is entered in the batch file. However, SAM.gov search box and the FSRS manual uploads are not case sensitive. Batch uploads are the only place where SAM UEIs are case sensitive. Further, this information is not included in any of the FSRS User Guides or manuals. I have shared this with the FSRS helpdesk, but no solution was provided. Again, this discrepancy in their system affects and delays our FFATA reporting processes. NJDOE dedicated personnel, including the director of OGM, continuously work with SAM.gov, FSRS system, and both system sites’ help desks, to bring to light the issues mentioned above in order to express the urgent need for corrective actions at the federal system sites to allow for timely FFATA reporting. In addition internal controls and procedures are in place at NJDOE related to FFATA reporting and corrective actions are constantly performed in real time to perform the below NJDOE Internal Controls and Procedures. Some of these procedures include reviewing internal SAM applications and troubleshooting with NJDOE’s local education agencies (LEAs) to correct data in the application and resubmit to the federal reporting system sites with more detail included below. NJDOE Internal Controls and Procedures: • Due to the large number of LEAs in the state (700+), each FFATA report must be submitted via batch upload, which saves an enormous amount of time it takes to input data manually for every single LEA, for every grant. To address this need and to expedite the process, our vendor has created a reporting tool that generates a FFATA batch report. • We have been contacting the federal helpdesk to address the issues on their sites and asking for support. Some of those tickets were closed without providing any support and most were not helpful. • We have created and implemented an in-house System for Award Management (SAM) application, mandatory for all of our federal grant recipients. This was done specifically for FFATA reporting purposes to ensure data in these applications are directly tied to the FFATA batch reports. • The SAM applications go through a thorough review process, where data entered by the districts is compared with the data registered with SAM.gov (applicants are required to upload a copy of their Entity Overview Record, issued by SAM.gov). • SAM applications are returned for changes whenever an applicant has entered data that is inconsistent with data on SAM.gov (i.e.. Incorrect SAM UEI, incorrect zip code, incorrect zip+4, incorrect City name). • We have asked many of our districts to contact SAM.gov and update their physical address information to include the full 9-digit zip code, which was SAM.gov reviewers’ oversight. Our school districts have commented that this process can take months. • We are communicating with our districts/applicants on a daily basis through the review summary checklist, outlining the changes that must be made, as well as by email and phone. • We have implemented an automatic messaging system, where applicants are reminded to update their SAM registration expiration date, multiple times a month leading up to their expiration date. Due to the system discrepancy in the FSRS system’s batch upload, we had to create a workaround pertaining to the district’s SAM UEIs. As stated above, SAM UEIs, in batch FFATA reports, are case sensitive while not case sensitive anywhere else in the two system sites. We have updated our instructions in NJDOE’s SAM application and have added another layer of application review, to ensure that all UEIs entered are in all capital letters. Because the federal helpdesk has ignored this discrepancy and did not resolve the issue, we are obligated to take additional steps and spend additional time on FFATA batch reports. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON Indeterminate – Completion based on federal implementation of fixes to SAM.gov and FSRS portal as noted in views. Martin Egan, Director NJDOE Office of Grants (609) 376-9089 Martin.Egan@doe.nj.gov
The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) Office of Grants Management (OGM) understands the need to be compliant with FFATA reporting in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Internal controls and processes are in place to ensure NJDOE’s FFATA reporting process is working efficiently and timely...
The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) Office of Grants Management (OGM) understands the need to be compliant with FFATA reporting in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Internal controls and processes are in place to ensure NJDOE’s FFATA reporting process is working efficiently and timely. This noncompliance finding is not due to a lack of controls within NJDOE but lies squarely on system issues at SAM.gov and the FFATA Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) sites and until the issues listed below are corrected on these federal system sites, NJDOE will continue to be noncompliant with timely FFATA reporting. Issues with the SAM.gov and FSRS sites: • SAM.gov has approved NJDOE’s local education agency (LEA) registrations without a ZIP+4, but FSRS reporting system for FFATA uploads requires ZIP+4 for each LEA. The two systems use the same database, which means information registered on SAM.gov feeds directly into the FSRS system. However, because FSRS batch uploads require a ZIP+4, those LEAs that were approved by SAM.gov without a ZIP+4 during the registration process, are rejected from the FFATA report batch upload. There is an option to manually load each LEA and their details into the system, but the process becomes incredibly time consuming, given the 700+ LEAs in the state, the number of federal awards granted, and the steps for identifying & removing rejected LEAs from the batch upload. • Issues NJDOE has with SAM.gov and FSRS have been shared with the federal helpdesk and a USED representative without avail, as the systematic issue remains unresolved and continues to delay our FFATA reporting process. • There are several rural LEAs in the state that do not have a ZIP+4. These LEAs will continue to be rejected from the batch upload, delaying our FFATA reporting process, if SAM.gov and FSRS do not come up with a viable solution. • There were a number of LEAs that were continuously rejected from the upload by FSRS for no obvious reasons. The error message received was the same exact error we receive for incorrect zip codes. After spending much time investigating the cause with the helpdesk support, it was identified that FSRS did not update their system to reflect the Congressional District code changes during New Jersey’s redistricting process. • The FSRS system rejects batch uploads if a single lower-case SAM UEIs is entered in the batch file. However, SAM.gov search box and the FSRS manual uploads are not case sensitive. Batch uploads are the only place where SAM UEIs are case sensitive. Further, this information is not included in any of the FSRS User Guides or manuals. I have shared this with the FSRS helpdesk, but no solution was provided. Again, this discrepancy in their system affects and delays our FFATA reporting processes. NJDOE dedicated personnel, including the director of OGM, continuously work with SAM.gov, FSRS system, and both system sites’ help desks, to bring to light the issues mentioned above in order to express the urgent need for corrective actions at the federal system sites to allow for timely FFATA reporting. In addition internal controls and procedures are in place at NJDOE related to FFATA reporting and corrective actions are constantly performed in real time to perform the below NJDOE Internal Controls and Procedures. Some of these procedures include reviewing internal SAM applications and troubleshooting with NJDOE’s local education agencies (LEAs) to correct data in the application and resubmit to the federal reporting system sites with more detail included below. NJDOE Internal Controls and Procedures: • Due to the large number of LEAs in the state (700+), each FFATA report must be submitted via batch upload, which saves an enormous amount of time it takes to input data manually for every single LEA, for every grant. To address this need and to expedite the process, our vendor has created a reporting tool that generates a FFATA batch report. • We have been contacting the federal helpdesk to address the issues on their sites and asking for support. Some of those tickets were closed without providing any support and most were not helpful. • We have created and implemented an in-house System for Award Management (SAM) application, mandatory for all of our federal grant recipients. This was done specifically for FFATA reporting purposes to ensure data in these applications are directly tied to the FFATA batch reports. • The SAM applications go through a thorough review process, where data entered by the districts is compared with the data registered with SAM.gov (applicants are required to upload a copy of their Entity Overview Record, issued by SAM.gov). • SAM applications are returned for changes whenever an applicant has entered data that is inconsistent with data on SAM.gov (i.e.. Incorrect SAM UEI, incorrect zip code, incorrect zip+4, incorrect City name). • We have asked many of our districts to contact SAM.gov and update their physical address information to include the full 9-digit zip code, which was SAM.gov reviewers’ oversight. Our school districts have commented that this process can take months. • We are communicating with our districts/applicants on a daily basis through the review summary checklist, outlining the changes that must be made, as well as by email and phone. • We have implemented an automatic messaging system, where applicants are reminded to update their SAM registration expiration date, multiple times a month leading up to their expiration date. Due to the system discrepancy in the FSRS system’s batch upload, we had to create a workaround pertaining to the district’s SAM UEIs. As stated above, SAM UEIs, in batch FFATA reports, are case sensitive while not case sensitive anywhere else in the two system sites. We have updated our instructions in NJDOE’s SAM application and have added another layer of application review, to ensure that all UEIs entered are in all capital letters. Because the federal helpdesk has ignored this discrepancy and did not resolve the issue, we are obligated to take additional steps and spend additional time on FFATA batch reports. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON Indeterminate – Completion based on federal implementation of fixes to SAM.gov and FSRS portal as noted in views. Martin Egan, Director NJDOE Office of Grants (609) 376-9089 Martin.Egan@doe.nj.gov
Finding 393202 (2023-008)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD), as the prime recipient of the federal awards, will ensure that all first-tier subawards made to entities totaling $30,000 or greater will be entered timely into the FSRS in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. The audit sample selec...
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD), as the prime recipient of the federal awards, will ensure that all first-tier subawards made to entities totaling $30,000 or greater will be entered timely into the FSRS in accordance with FFATA reporting requirements. The audit sample selections in question were based on manual DLWD notice of awards that were not communicated correctly to staff who are responsible for entering the required subaward information into FSRS. Going forward, DLWD staff who are responsible for entering data into the FSRS will be copied on all emails containing the manual notice of award(s) once the notice is signed by the DLWD Commissioner. These email communications will trigger the information to be entered into the FSRS. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON April 4, 2024 Michael Varga (609) 351-3000 Michael.Varga@dol.nj.gov
View Audit 303516 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 393201 (2023-007)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The Department of Human Services (DHS), Central Office Payroll group will run reports biweekly to determine if any employees are on a leave without pay status greater than 10 days. This added reporting function will ensure that all DHS employees who are on a leave of absence without pay beyond 10 d...
The Department of Human Services (DHS), Central Office Payroll group will run reports biweekly to determine if any employees are on a leave without pay status greater than 10 days. This added reporting function will ensure that all DHS employees who are on a leave of absence without pay beyond 10 days have their PMIS histories updated upon each extension and return to work. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON March 26, 2024 Maureen Taylor (609) 292-6106 Maureen.Taylor@dhs.nj.gov
View Audit 303516 Questioned Costs: $1
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) transitioned from a manual contract agreement process to a web-based grant administration system in recent years that employs the System for Administering Grants Electronically (SAGE) and IntelliGrants (IGX) applications. The DLWD FFATA Report...
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) transitioned from a manual contract agreement process to a web-based grant administration system in recent years that employs the System for Administering Grants Electronically (SAGE) and IntelliGrants (IGX) applications. The DLWD FFATA Reporting Unit has access to these automated systems and monitors them on a monthly basis to identify when new subaward contracts/agreements are approved in order to report required data in the FFATA system timely. DLWD corrective actions regarding FFATA reporting are expected to be fully implemented as of June 30, 2024. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON June 30, 2024 Theresa Vallely (609) 984-1779 Theresa.Vallely@dol.nj.gov
View Audit 303516 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 393196 (2023-005)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development’s (DLWD) Office of Information Management, Services & Solutions (OIMSS) will continue its efforts to ensure staff compliance with existing controls over program change controls for the New Jersey Local Office Online Payment System (NJLOOPs). DLWD’s ...
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development’s (DLWD) Office of Information Management, Services & Solutions (OIMSS) will continue its efforts to ensure staff compliance with existing controls over program change controls for the New Jersey Local Office Online Payment System (NJLOOPs). DLWD’s efforts will continue to be guided by statewide change management best practices. OIMSS will add a Director-level approval step to the program promotion process that will validate that the required documentation has been uploaded to the change ticket. Except in circumstances involving emergency off-hours break fix resolution, separation of duties will be included as a check-off for approval to deploy program changes. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON April 3,2024 Matthew Curtis (609) 376-4021 Matthew.Curtis@dol.nj.gov Robert Schisler (609) 571-2391 Robert.Schisler@dol.nj.gov
Finding 393194 (2023-004)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) continues to monitor all first payment and non-monetary time lapse figures in order to meet the established USDOL Acceptable Levels of Performance (ALP). As workloads return to normal levels after the increased activity from the COVID-19 pand...
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) continues to monitor all first payment and non-monetary time lapse figures in order to meet the established USDOL Acceptable Levels of Performance (ALP). As workloads return to normal levels after the increased activity from the COVID-19 pandemic related claims, greater emphasis will continue to be placed on meeting all ALPs. Specifically relating to first payments and the previously discussed issues with claimants verifying their identity before any payments can be made, the DLWD has made some internal changes to how returned verified IDs from our ID verification partner (ID.me) are handled. These modifications to the internal process used to clear verified IDs are expected to have a positive impact on overall time lapse numbers as verified claimants will not be delayed longer than they previously were under the old process. The month of April starts the new reporting year for these figures to USDOL and New Jersey expects to see significant increases to first payment and non-monetary time lapse figures by the third quarter of calendar year 2024. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON September 2023 Theresa Vallely (609) 984-1779 Theresa.Vallely@dol.nj.gov
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) will continue to review and enhance controls to ensure that BAM quality control case investigations are completed timely, that reviews are signed as required by appropriate staff, and that all required case review supporting documentation is m...
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) will continue to review and enhance controls to ensure that BAM quality control case investigations are completed timely, that reviews are signed as required by appropriate staff, and that all required case review supporting documentation is maintained in case files. DLWD corrective actions will be completed by September 30, 2024. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON September 30, 2024 Theresa Vallely (609) 984-1779 Theresa.Vallely@dol.nj.gov
The Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessments (RESEA) policy and controls presently in place at the Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) require eligibility interviews to be conducted and eligibility review forms to be completed and signed by the participant and UI program re...
The Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessments (RESEA) policy and controls presently in place at the Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) require eligibility interviews to be conducted and eligibility review forms to be completed and signed by the participant and UI program representative. DLWD implemented a new process that allows staff to electronically obtain signatures through Simpligov, beginning June 2023. This process requires that staff obtain all necessary signatures before a RESEA claimant record is completed. Supervisors are assigned to monitor this process in order to mitigate the risk associated with missing information on any single RESEA customer registration. DLWD will monitor this process to ensure that all interviews are properly documented, and forms are signed and electronically uploaded to its electronic case management system of record for future reference. During the initial rollout of this process, there were records that didn’t migrate to the case management system of record. This issue has now been addressed through training. DLWD has also developed dashboards that will assist with monitoring data entry. Monthly reviews of RESEA data entry will be conducted to identify possible errors. These RESEA process changes that will be implemented by DLWD will ensure compliance with regulatory standards and assist with maintaining the integrity of its data management process. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON June 30, 2023 Baden Almonor (609) 777-1042 Baden.Almonor@dol.nj.gov
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) has controls in place to only allow an FPUC payment to be made when an underlying Unemployment Insurance (UI) payment has also been processed. FPUC payments should not be issued to any claim without the underlying UI payment being made for th...
The Department of Labor and Workforce Development (DLWD) has controls in place to only allow an FPUC payment to be made when an underlying Unemployment Insurance (UI) payment has also been processed. FPUC payments should not be issued to any claim without the underlying UI payment being made for the same week. The FPUC payments issued and noted as exceptions during eligibility testing will be reviewed independently by DLWD to determine if the payments issued were to eligible recipients or not. For the PUA exceptions noted during Eligibility testing, overall the DLWD issued PUA payments to over 680,000 claimants during the COVID-19 pandemic. DLWD had controls in place to require a COVID related reason to make the claim PUA eligible and the weekly PUA certification required claimants to choose a COVID related reason for why they were out of work before they could get paid. The PUA payments in question will be reviewed independently by the DLWD to determine if the payments issued under PUA were appropriate or if they should have been paid instead under the regular UI program. DLWD corrective actions related to FPUC and PUA payments were fully implemented as of September 2023. COMPLETION DATE/ CONTACT PERSON September 2023 Theresa Vallely (609) 984-1779 Theresa.Vallely@dol.nj.gov
View Audit 303516 Questioned Costs: $1
2023-002 Finding – Federal Award Type: Federal Award – Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of Federal Program:  21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (OFB internal grant name: Food Supply Stabilization Funds (FSSF)...
2023-002 Finding – Federal Award Type: Federal Award – Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Identification of Federal Program:  21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (OFB internal grant name: Food Supply Stabilization Funds (FSSF))  10.182 – Food Bank Network (OFB internal grant name: Local Farmers Purchasing Assistance (LFPA)) Criteria/Requirement: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. According to 2 CFR section 180, when a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition/Context: OFB passed through $4,027,781 in funding to subrecipients under Assistance Listing 21.027 and $1,825,785 in funding to subrecipients under Assistance Listing 10.182. During our audit, we noted that Oregon Food Bank, Inc did not verify subrecipients for suspension or debarment. Cause: The organization’s policy does not include language regarding verifying if a vendor or subrecipient is suspended or debarred. Effect: A suspended or debarred vendor subrecipient may receive federal funding. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Revise policies to include language for verifying if vendor or subrecipient is suspended or debarred before entering contracted transactions. Management’s Response (corrective action plan): Management concurs with the audit finding 2023-001. Oregon Food Bank, Inc. will revise policies to include language for verifying if vendor or subrecipient is suspended or debarred before entering contracted transactions.
2023-001 Finding – Federal Award Type: Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Non-Compliance and Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Identification of Federal Program:  21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (OFB internal grant name: Food Supply Stabilization Funds (FSSF))...
2023-001 Finding – Federal Award Type: Subrecipient Monitoring – Material Non-Compliance and Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Identification of Federal Program:  21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (OFB internal grant name: Food Supply Stabilization Funds (FSSF))  10.182 – Food Bank Network (OFB internal grant name: Local Farmers Purchasing Assistance (LFPA)) Criteria / Requirement: The 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. In accordance with 2CFR§200.332, a pass-through entity must clearly identify to the subrecipient the award as a subaward by providing the required federal information related to the award, all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and the provisions of contracts and grants agreements. The pass-through entity must evaluate risk of non-compliance of each subrecipient, monitoring the subrecipient and ensuring accountability of for-profit subrecipients. Condition / Context: Oregon Food Bank, Inc. passed through $4,027,781 in funding to subrecipients under Assistance Listing 21.027 and $1,825,785 in funding to subrecipients under Assistance Listing 10.182. During our audit, we noted that Oregon Food Bank, Inc. did not have formal written procedures or controls in place to ensure compliance with the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) subrecipient monitoring requirements. Per review of subaward contracts, required federal contract information was not clearly identified. Further, there was not adequate documentation that subrecipients were evaluated for risk of non-compliance. Subrecipients were not sufficiently monitored as procedures were informal and were not applied consistently. Cause: Procedures are not in place to ensure that Oregon Food Bank, Inc. is providing adequate subaward contracts or maintaining proper subrecipient monitoring for each federal subrecipient. Effect: Failure to maintain sufficient subrecipient contracts and monitoring may result in the wrongful use of federal funds and non‐compliance with the provisions of applicable requirements of the federal award. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Oregon Food Bank, Inc. should establish written policies and procedures regarding the contracting and monitoring of subrecipients that are in line with Uniform Guidance requirements, as well as establish organizational controls to ensure that such policies and procedures are being followed. Management’s Response (corrective action plan): Management concurs with the audit finding 2023-001. Oregon Food Bank, Inc. will establish written policies and procedures regarding the contracting and monitoring of subrecipients that are in line with Uniform Guidance requirements, as well as establishing organizational controls to ensure that such policies and procedures are being followed.
2023-002 U.S. Department of Transportation, National Infrastructure Investments: Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Grant Assistance Listing Number 20.933; Procurement Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Finding Summary: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that t...
2023-002 U.S. Department of Transportation, National Infrastructure Investments: Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) Grant Assistance Listing Number 20.933; Procurement Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Finding Summary: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award the provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and conditions of the federal award. Non-federal entities other than states, including those operating federal programs as subrecipients of states, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR Part 200. The Port Authority’s formally documented policy pre-dates Uniform Guidance and does not include many of the necessary procurement provisions. Corrective Action Plan: An updated Procurement Policy is being drafted to meet the standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.317 to 220.237, then reviewed and approved by our Board at the next appointed board Meeting. Expected Completion Date: March 2024 Responsible Individuals: Kimbra Scott
Recommendation: The design of the current controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are accurate, complete, and orderly and include a checklist of required documentation and retention guidelines. Procedures should also be established to ensure that the Form 50059 is completed timely and pr...
Recommendation: The design of the current controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are accurate, complete, and orderly and include a checklist of required documentation and retention guidelines. Procedures should also be established to ensure that the Form 50059 is completed timely and properly executed. The documentation in the files should support the data used in preparing the Form 50059 and calculating the tenant’s share of the rent. Action Taken: Management has started the process of reviewing, revising, streamlining and educating all staff on the HUD guidelines related to tenant file documentation requirements and proper completion of the Form 50059, including the documentation required to support the rent calculations.
Recommendation: Procedures should be established to properly track requests, approvals and withdrawals form the reserve for replacements account. Action Taken: Management has started the process of reviewing, revising, streamlining and educating all staff on the HUD guidelines related to the reserv...
Recommendation: Procedures should be established to properly track requests, approvals and withdrawals form the reserve for replacements account. Action Taken: Management has started the process of reviewing, revising, streamlining and educating all staff on the HUD guidelines related to the reserve for replacements account.
Recommendation: The design of the current controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are accurate, complete, and orderly and include a checklist of required documentation and retention guidelines. Procedures should also be established to ensure that the Form 50059 is completed timely and pr...
Recommendation: The design of the current controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are accurate, complete, and orderly and include a checklist of required documentation and retention guidelines. Procedures should also be established to ensure that the Form 50059 is completed timely and properly executed. The documentation in the files should support the data used in preparing the Form 50059 and calculating the tenant’s share of the rent. Action Taken: Management has started the process of reviewing, revising, streamlining and educating all staff on the HUD guidelines related to tenant file documentation requirements and proper completion of the Form 50059, including the documentation required to support the rent calculations.
Recommendation: The design of the current controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are accurate, complete, and orderly and include a checklist of required documentation and retention guidelines. Procedures should also be established to ensure that the Form 50059 is completed timely and pr...
Recommendation: The design of the current controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are accurate, complete, and orderly and include a checklist of required documentation and retention guidelines. Procedures should also be established to ensure that the Form 50059 is completed timely and properly executed. The documentation in the files should support the data used in preparing the Form 50059 and calculating the tenant’s share of the rent. Action Taken: Management has started the process of reviewing, revising, streamlining and educating all staff on the HUD guidelines related to tenant file documentation requirements and proper completion of the Form 50059, including the documentation required to support the rent calculations.
Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Nicole Fortier, Director of Finance and Operations Corrective Action: During our audit it was identified that MMUUSD overpaid an employee for four charges under the Food Service program and charged the work to the program that was not specific to Foo...
Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Nicole Fortier, Director of Finance and Operations Corrective Action: During our audit it was identified that MMUUSD overpaid an employee for four charges under the Food Service program and charged the work to the program that was not specific to Food Service. To be more specific, Food Service subs were paid at a higher rate ($.50 higher) than the stated rate for a Food Service substitute. Additionally, there were instances noted where a maintenance substitute was charged to a Food Service budget unit. The first step in our corrective action plan was a review with our Senior Payment Specialist of the importance of slowing down and verifying the correct hourly rate being input for our substitutes. This step has already been completed. Additionally, we are in the process of implementing a more thorough payroll review process, which will include a preliminary review by Christal Clark, Accountant in the Business Office. Once Christal has completed her review, this will go to Nicole Fortier, Director of Finance for a final, high‐level review and sign off. We are hopeful to begin the process at the end of FY24, with full implementation in FY25. Anticipated Completion Date: 7/01/2024
Finding 393173 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
The City will enhance its record-keeping practices to ensure that documentation of suspension or debarment verification is consistently maintained for all procurement transactions by having several layers of over sight.
The City will enhance its record-keeping practices to ensure that documentation of suspension or debarment verification is consistently maintained for all procurement transactions by having several layers of over sight.
I will ensure the Financial Aid Office works closely with the Accounts Payables department to monitor that all Title IV refund checks have been cashed after 30 days of issuance of the refund. If a check has not been cashed a new check will be reissued immediately. If, after 30 days of the reissuance...
I will ensure the Financial Aid Office works closely with the Accounts Payables department to monitor that all Title IV refund checks have been cashed after 30 days of issuance of the refund. If a check has not been cashed a new check will be reissued immediately. If, after 30 days of the reissuance, the check has not been cashed then the funds will be returned to the Department of Education within the mandated 45-day period.
View Audit 303492 Questioned Costs: $1
We recently completed the transition and onboarding of departmental staff which would allow the University to fully enact its plan to ensure both the financial aid and the Registrar's office will perform prompt review of processing University withdrawals. The Registrar's office will develop process ...
We recently completed the transition and onboarding of departmental staff which would allow the University to fully enact its plan to ensure both the financial aid and the Registrar's office will perform prompt review of processing University withdrawals. The Registrar's office will develop process and procedures documentation as an internal control measuring tool to ensure that Administrative Withdrawals (AW) and Withdrawals for lack of attendance (WA) that affect student emollment are identified immediately. Staff in the Financial Aid and the Registrar's office will actively take part in training workshops and webinars provided by the Depatiment of Education and NASF AA for continuing education to stay abreast of new developments and best practices in the industry.
View Audit 303492 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-002 – SF-425 Financial Reporting Condition: The City's internal controls over required reporting requirements were not accurately monitored and reviewed to prevent, or detect and correct the current year's actual federal spending. In conjunction with our fiscal year 2023 audit, please s...
Finding 2023-002 – SF-425 Financial Reporting Condition: The City's internal controls over required reporting requirements were not accurately monitored and reviewed to prevent, or detect and correct the current year's actual federal spending. In conjunction with our fiscal year 2023 audit, please see the City’s corrective action plan below: To address the audit finding, the City agrees with the recommendation. Although inaccuracy is mostly due to changes in personnel, management will make a greater effort to submit complete and accurate reports. The City agrees with the recommendation. Although inaccuracies are mostly due to change in personnel, management will make a greater effort to submit complete and accurate reports. Expected completion date: 9/30/2024. Party Responsible: Larry Mitchell, City Manager Contact Information: citymanager@cityofholdenville.net
« 1 1234 1235 1237 1238 2144 »