Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
56,677
In database
Filtered Results
53,691
Matching current filters
Showing Page
1019 of 2148
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Finding 501500 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Corrective Action: Beginning in 2024, management will take minutes for its monthly meetings with program leads and accounting staff to document discussions of grant compliance matters including matching requirements. Projected Completion Date: December 31, 2024
Corrective Action: Beginning in 2024, management will take minutes for its monthly meetings with program leads and accounting staff to document discussions of grant compliance matters including matching requirements. Projected Completion Date: December 31, 2024
In order to comply with the federal requirement, the Administration is standardizing the reporting process and defining the roles and responsibilities associated with these tasks to ensure that the Federal Financial Reports Standard Forms 425 (SF-425) are submitted as required. We expect to be in a...
In order to comply with the federal requirement, the Administration is standardizing the reporting process and defining the roles and responsibilities associated with these tasks to ensure that the Federal Financial Reports Standard Forms 425 (SF-425) are submitted as required. We expect to be in a position to comply with this requirement by the end of FY 2024-2025.
In order to comply with the federal requirement, the Administration is standardizing the reporting process and defining the roles and responsibilities associated with these tasks to ensure that the Federal Funding Accountability Transparency Act (FFATA) reports are submitted as required. We expect ...
In order to comply with the federal requirement, the Administration is standardizing the reporting process and defining the roles and responsibilities associated with these tasks to ensure that the Federal Funding Accountability Transparency Act (FFATA) reports are submitted as required. We expect to be in a position to comply with this requirement by the end of FY 2024-2025.
The Administration will take steps to strengthen internal controls by developing guidelines and monitoring procedures for completing reports, and other tasks related to meet these requirements. As we recognize that this is an ongoing process, the program will continue to enforce policies and procedu...
The Administration will take steps to strengthen internal controls by developing guidelines and monitoring procedures for completing reports, and other tasks related to meet these requirements. As we recognize that this is an ongoing process, the program will continue to enforce policies and procedures by training all necessary staff on timeliness of procedure ensuring that the program fully complies with the monitoring process. Regarding the Single Audit for fiscal year 2024 the Administration have been working closely with the auditors to complete the submission of the Single Audit Report, which are expected to be finalized before the nine months after the 2024 fiscal yearend to be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance submission requirement.
City of Madison Fire Department will coordinate with the City of Madison, Internal Audit and Grants function of the Finance Department, for an independent person to review the reports before submission to ensure the loss revenue calculation and amounts reported are accurate. This additional internal...
City of Madison Fire Department will coordinate with the City of Madison, Internal Audit and Grants function of the Finance Department, for an independent person to review the reports before submission to ensure the loss revenue calculation and amounts reported are accurate. This additional internal control procedure will ensure there are proper review and approval processes over completeness and accuracy of reports before submissions to federal agencies.
On the 1st Quarter 2024 Quarterly Project and Expenditure (P&E) Report, the Grant Supervisor reported all expenditures related to the Revenue Recovery Replacement Category and submitted the report through the Treasury Portal. This correction was made prior to the auditor’s finding for 2023. Going fo...
On the 1st Quarter 2024 Quarterly Project and Expenditure (P&E) Report, the Grant Supervisor reported all expenditures related to the Revenue Recovery Replacement Category and submitted the report through the Treasury Portal. This correction was made prior to the auditor’s finding for 2023. Going forward, expenditures related to Revenue Recovery Replacement will be reported under Category 6 per the “Compliance and Reporting Guidance, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund”, dated March 28, 2024.
Subsequently, on August 2024, the shortfall in the reserve for replacement was funded.
Subsequently, on August 2024, the shortfall in the reserve for replacement was funded.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: Alamo Area Mutual Housing Association Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2023 Compliance Review A. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors regar...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: Alamo Area Mutual Housing Association Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2023 Compliance Review A. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors regarding our noncompliance as cited in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. ACTIONS TAKEN FINDING 2023-004: The Company does not have effective internal controls or consistently follow the written policies and procedures over federal awards. CORRECTIVE ACTION: Alamo is seeking training and support to improve internal controls and policies and procedures for oversight of federal awards. We have prepared the corrective action plan as required by the standards applicable to financial statements contained in Government Auditing Standards and by the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Any questions regarding the above corrective action plan should be directed to Christine Drennon, Executive Director.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: Alamo Area Mutual Housing Association Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2023 Compliance Review A. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors rega...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name and Number of the Project: Alamo Area Mutual Housing Association Audit Firm: M Group, LLP Audit Period: The year ended December 31, 2023 Compliance Review A. COMMENTS ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We concur with the findings and recommendations of our auditors regarding our noncompliance as cited in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. ACTIONS TAKEN FINDING 2023-003: Section 223(a)(7) HUD Insured Loan, Assistance Listing 14.135 - AAMHA Western Hills, LLC HUD Project No. 115-115888, AAMHA KPTP, LLC HUD Project No 115-35652 and Section 223(f) HUD Insured Loan, Assistance Listing 14.155 - AAMHA Calcasieu, LLC HUD Project No 115-11280Section 223(a)(7) HUD Insured Loan, Assistance Listing 14.135. Entity expenses and receipts were recorded on the incorrect project’s books. CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETED: a. AAMHA Western Hills, LLC - On April 24, 2024, $3,199 was received from an affiliate. b. AAMHA KPTP, LLC - During 2023, $16,321 was received from affiliates. On May 10, 2023, the Project received $8,027. c. AAMHA Calcasieu, LLC – On April 16, 2024, the Project received $5,869 from an affiliate. We have prepared the corrective action plan as required by the standards applicable to financial statements contained in Government Auditing Standards and by the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Any questions regarding the above corrective action plan should be directed to Christine Drennon, Executive Director.
View Audit 323539 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-003 – Federal Award Finding Name of Official Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Richardson, First AME Housing Association Interim Executive Director Corrective Action Planned: We appreciate the audit team's diligence in reviewing our financial processes and acknowledge the finding...
Finding 2023-003 – Federal Award Finding Name of Official Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Richardson, First AME Housing Association Interim Executive Director Corrective Action Planned: We appreciate the audit team's diligence in reviewing our financial processes and acknowledge the finding related to the untimely reserve deposit. 1. Explanation: Example: "The delay in making the reserve deposit was primarily due to management not fully understanding HUD fund authorization per the HUD Handbook 4350. 2. Corrective Actions Taken: We have taken the following corrective actions: All reserve funds have been deposited in the appropriate reserve accounts at our bank. We have implemented a revised deposit schedule that will deposit reserve funds as required after receipt of direct deposit voucher payment from CMS. 3. Preventive Measures: To prevent a recurrence of this issue, we have instituted additional preventive measures, including producing monthly financial reports showing the deposits in a bank reconciliation line of the item and on the balance sheet. 4. Commitment to Compliance: We uphold the highest financial responsibility and compliance standards. Moving forward, we will remain vigilant to ensure timely reserve deposits and will continue to prioritize adherence to all relevant regulations and internal policies."
Finding 2023-002 – Federal Award Finding Name of Official Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Richardson, First AME Housing Association Interim Executive Director Corrective Action Planned: Explanation: We acknowledge the oversight and would like to provide context to understand better the circu...
Finding 2023-002 – Federal Award Finding Name of Official Responsible for Corrective Action: Earl Richardson, First AME Housing Association Interim Executive Director Corrective Action Planned: Explanation: We acknowledge the oversight and would like to provide context to understand better the circumstances that led to the delay. We had internal challenges when our previous management company departed, leaving us with incomplete files and late recertifications or recertifications that never started, making it next to impossible to catch up promptly. Next, staff staffing issues contributed to the delays because staff members were not properly trained. Despite these challenges, we recognize the importance of adhering to HUD regulations and are committed to taking corrective measures. Corrective Actions Taken: We initiated immediate corrective actions to rectify the situation upon discovering the late recertifications. We have instituted the following measures to prevent the recurrence of late annual recertifications. 1. Created a recertification schedule and calendar with the annual recertification date, specific dates to notify residents that their annual recertification is due, and dates for submitting the information to CMS and to trac. The schedule and calendar are submitted to the executive director every two weeks to monitor progress, and a meeting is scheduled with staff every two weeks to review recertification issues. 2. We hired a consultant specializing in recertification to train the staff and work with staff daily to answer questions concerning our certification. This is not a one-anddone; our recertification consultant is permanently on call to answer certification issues and continuous staff training. These measures are designed to ensure timely compliance with HUD regulations and to strengthen our internal processes.
The Business Manager has year-end procedures in place to ensure year end adjusting entries are performed prior to the audit.
The Business Manager has year-end procedures in place to ensure year end adjusting entries are performed prior to the audit.
Finding 501234 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Trempealeau County, being a small county, has limited resources in personnel to accomplish a multi-verification in the reporting process. We will use additional current employees in house to do the verification to make sure the reporting is accurate before submitting. Responsible Person: Paul L. Syv...
Trempealeau County, being a small county, has limited resources in personnel to accomplish a multi-verification in the reporting process. We will use additional current employees in house to do the verification to make sure the reporting is accurate before submitting. Responsible Person: Paul L. Syverson, County Clerk Anticipated Completion Date: We will attempt to begin the multiple verification process for the 2024 calendar year
Finding 501230 (2023-001)
Material Weakness 2023
Finding 2023-001 Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution Federal Assistance Listing #93.498 Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Activities to Support St...
Finding 2023-001 Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution Federal Assistance Listing #93.498 Federal Agency Name: Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Health Department Response to Public Health or Healthcare Crisis Federal Assistance Listing: #93.391 Finding Summary: During the course of our engagement, we noted a material program missing from the Schedule that was not identified by management. Responsible Individuals: Kevin Abel, CEO and Brigid Burke, CFO Status: Procedures and controls over tracking and recording of federal programs with the Schedule will be updated in order to provide a complete Schedule. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024
Reference: 2023-003 Corrective Action: The City will work on updating the procurement policy to include clearer expectations. Responsible Person: Kristopher Hanus Frederickson, Mayor; Patrick Reagan, City Administrator; Wendi Bixby, Finance Director/Treasurer Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2...
Reference: 2023-003 Corrective Action: The City will work on updating the procurement policy to include clearer expectations. Responsible Person: Kristopher Hanus Frederickson, Mayor; Patrick Reagan, City Administrator; Wendi Bixby, Finance Director/Treasurer Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025
2023-004 Preparation of and Internal controls over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Preparation (Material Weakness) Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Award Period: June 30, 2023 Recommendation: The Board...
2023-004 Preparation of and Internal controls over Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Preparation (Material Weakness) Federal Agency: U.S Department of Education Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Award Period: June 30, 2023 Recommendation: The Board of Education and management should review the financial reporting process. Once this review is complete, the District should then perform a risk assessment to determine the best way to implement appropriate internal controls over financial reporting to ensure that the District prepares the schedule conformity with Uniform Guidance. Action Taken (Unaudited): Management plans to work with a third-party consulting firm to address issues and improve protocols. Contact Name – Dr. Jessica Dain Expected Completion Date - 12/31/2024
Finding: According to the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.303 (a), non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls over these awards. These controls must provide reasonable assurance that the entity manages the Federal award in compliance with applic...
Finding: According to the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.303 (a), non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls over these awards. These controls must provide reasonable assurance that the entity manages the Federal award in compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. A fundamental objective of an effective internal control system is to ensure that information is accurate and reliable, which includes a thorough review and approval process. The Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement, May 2023, requires the Alabama Department of Labor to ensure an employer’s experience rating is properly applied, as the employer’s “experience” with the unemployment of former employees is the dominant factor in the computation of the employer’s annual state Unemployment Insurance tax rate. The Alabama Department of Labor was unable to provide audit documentation to support their review and approval of employer experience rated tax rates. The Alabama Department of Labor did not have policies and procedures in place to document the review and approval of the employer experience rated tax rates. As a result, the employer experience related tax rates could be incorrect, resulting in potential overpayments or underpayments of taxes. Recommendation: The Alabama Department of Labor should develop and document internal controls over employer experience rated tax rates to help ensure they are accurate and properly applied. Response/Views: ADOL does not agree with this finding as explained in the Request for Views CAP letter. Corrective Action Planned: Procedures were in place to ensure accuracy of information. However, the support documentation of this verification was not retained during the time of this review. Anticipated Completion Date: Additional processes to retain support documentation of this verification have already been implemented. Contact Person(s): Thomas Daniel, ADOL Unemployment Compensation Division Director
Finding: According to the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls over these awards. These controls must provide reasonable assurance that the entity manages the Federal award in compliance with applica...
Finding: According to the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.303(a), non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards must establish and maintain effective internal controls over these awards. These controls must provide reasonable assurance that the entity manages the Federal award in compliance with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award. The Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement, May 2023, requires the Alabama Department of Labor to operate a Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services (WPRS) or Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessments (RESEA) program. The Alabama Department of Labor operates a RESEA program. Under the RESEA program, Alabama Department of Labor staff must be promptly and appropriately notified of any eligibility issues identified during any review of a claimant’s information. Claimants are also required to attend appointments for reemployment to maintain their eligibility status. The Alabama Department of Labor has controls in place to provide notification of claimants who failed to report to scheduled RESEA appointments, however those controls were not operating as designed. While reviewing 25 claimant’s information, we noted that 8 claimants failed to report to their scheduled appointments for reemployment. These failures to appear are reported to staff at the Alabama Department of Labor and should prompt a stop of benefit payments; however, the Alabama Department of Labor did not stop payment on these 8 claimants which resulted in overpayments totaling $8,884.00. There was also one instance where Alabama Department of Labor could not provide documentation to support staff was appropriately notified of the eligibility status for a claimant. The Alabama Department of Labor’s policies and procedures did not operate as designed to prevent payments to ineligible claimants. Because the Alabama Department of Labor’s internal controls were not operating as designed, this caused benefits to be paid to ineligible claimants. Recommendation: The Alabama Department of Labor should ensure internal controls are operating as designed to help ensure payments are not made to ineligible claimants. Response/Views: ADOL does not agree with this finding as explained in the Request for Views CAP letter. Corrective Action Planned: Issues reported were beyond ADOL control due to another system shared by multiple state agencies being brought down due to cyberattack. The shared system is not the system of record for UI benefit payments. UI claim records were manually reviewed by UI staff and noted accordingly upon review. Additional measures and procedures have already been implemented in case of future occurrences. Anticipated Completion Date: Already corrected. System processes implemented in October 2023 Contact Person(s): Thomas Daniel, ADOL Unemployment Compensation Division Director
View Audit 323486 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: The Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement, dated May 2023, stipulates for a cost to be allowable under federal awards certain general criteria must be met, including costs that are adequately documented and necessary and reasonable for the performance of the fe...
Finding: The Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement, dated May 2023, stipulates for a cost to be allowable under federal awards certain general criteria must be met, including costs that are adequately documented and necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award. The Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) passed through a portion of the Immunization Cooperative Agreement federal award to subrecipients. During our audit, the ADPH’s Office of Program Integrity (OPI) notified us that based on its investigation a subrecipient was not submitting adequate supporting documentation for reimbursement requests. A total of thirteen subrecipients requested and received reimbursement of program expenses during the fiscal year. Based upon procedures performed, we noted that of the 13 subrecipients who received federal award reimbursements, six did not provide adequate detailed documentation to support their requests for reimbursement. In addition, forty-eight of the sixty-three invoices submitted for reimbursement by the subrecipients did not have adequate documentation resulting in questioned costs of $8,478,032.39 and one of the invoices included an improper payment of $2,600.00 for a total question cost of $8,480,632.39. The ADPH did not have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure that all requests for reimbursement were supported by adequate detailed documentation to ensure all coast are allowed under the federal award. This is a material weakness in internal controls. Recommendation: The Alabama Department of Public Health should take action to ensure that all reimbursements of expenses are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and to ensure costs are allowable under the federal award. Response/Views: We agree with the Examiners' finding; adequate documentation did not exist at the time of the audit to substantiate payments that resulted in questioned costs and improper payments. However, we do not concur with the total amount of the questioned costs cited in the report. ADPH's Office of Program Integrity initiated its own ongoing investigation. As this process continues, we are requesting additional documentation from the subrecipients, which will affect the questioned costs of this program. Corrective Action Planned: As noted, ADPH's Office of Program Integrity (OPI) has initiated its own internal on-going investigation. As part of that investigation, the Federal Grantor was notified of the situation and OPI is requesting supporting documentation from the sub grantees. ADPH is strengthening the internal control system for grants management. ADPH has and will continue to develop internal grant training for all employees who handle any phase of grant activities or have managerial responsibility for a grant. ADPH is working to make this training mandatory. In addition, the Centers for Disease Control has grant training available which will be utilized. The Bureau of Financial Services is establishing a Grants Management Office and has distributed grant tools such as a standard Risk Assessment Form for grant program use. Corrective action within the Immunization Division will include hiring additional staff to support the grant review and monitoring process. Immunization will implement the following procedures: • Grant guidance will be reviewed semi-annually, or when updated, with program grant monitoring staff to ensure compliance. • Invoices and supporting documentation for source documents will be reviewed against grant guidance as received by program staff and approved by Operations Manager or Division Director to ensure costs to the grant are reasonable, allowable, allocable, and consistently applied. • Grant monitoring staff will ensure that all reimbursements of expenses are adequately documented, based on true and accurate invoices, and costs are allowable under the federal award. • Invoices or vague requests requiring additional documentation will be held until the necessary information is provided. • Ensure all program grant staff have access to and attend all available Finance and Grant training courses. • Engage assigned Grant Accountant quarterly or as needed. • Conduct a Risk Assessment on all new subrecipients within 30 days of a signed grant agreement which will be forwarded to OPI for review. • Immunization staff will conduct a Risk Assessment on all current subrecipients within 60 days which will be forwarded to OPI for review. • Immunization staff, along with Finance and OPI, will develop a subrecipient monitoring plan based on the Risk Assessment of each subrecipient. The monitoring plan will be completed within 30 days of the receipt of the completed Risk Assessment. • Copies of all completed monitoring activities, as outlined in the monitoring plan, will be forwarded to OPI. Anticipated Completion Date: April 1, 2025 Contact Person(s): Immunization: Denise Strickland, Immunization Division Director; Daniels, Immunization Operations Manager; Harrison Wallace, Director, Bureau of Communicable Disease; Bureau of Financial Services: Shaundra B. Morris, Chief Accountant; Office of Program Integrity: Debra S. Thrash, Director
View Audit 323486 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding: The Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement, dated May 2023, stipulates for a cost to be allowable under federal awards certain general criteria must be met, including costs that are adequately documented and necessary and reasonable for the performance of the fe...
Finding: The Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement, dated May 2023, stipulates for a cost to be allowable under federal awards certain general criteria must be met, including costs that are adequately documented and necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award. The Alabama Department of Transportation (the “Department”) passed through a portion of the Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program federal award to subrecipients. One of the subrecipients requested and received reimbursement of program expenses. Subsequent to the payments of the invoices, the Department received information alleging that falsified or altered documents related to expenditures submitted by a subrecipient. Upon receipt of these allegations, the Department initiated a review of the supporting documents which had been submitted by the subrecipient. The review consisted of obtaining documents from vendors and comparing those documents to the ones submitted by the subrecipient. The results of this comparison indicated that the amounts owed and the description of goods and services provided columns had been changed. Nine of ten supporting documents for meeting expenses submitted for reimbursement by the subrecipient during the audit period were altered and were not true and accurate. These altered supporting documents totaled $94,123.56. The Alabama Department of Transportation reimbursed the subrecipient based on the altered documents and, therefore, improperly expended Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program federal award funds. Recommendation: The Alabama Department of Transportation should take actions to ensure that all reimbursements of expenses are adequately documented, based on true and accurate supporting documentation, and to ensure costs are allowable under the federal award. Response/Views: We agree that there appears to have been falsified supporting documentation submitted by a subrecipient. Corrective Action Planned: Once we were made aware of the allegation, we began a thorough review of the subrecipient’s invoices. Based on the information discovered during our review, we notified the Federal Transit Administration, Alabama Attorney General’s Office, Alabama Ethics Commission, and the Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts. The Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Transportation is currently investigating the case. The subrecipient involved in this matter is no longer associated with our Transit Program. The duties that they performed were either moved to another subrecipient or in-house. We have modified our invoice review process, and the changes have been applied to all subrecipients for the Transit Program. Anticipated Completion Date: We have taken the steps outlined above as of August 28, 2024. Contact Person(s): Jeff Hornsby, Chief Financial Officer
View Audit 323486 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 501221 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Finding: 45 CFR Section 261 .63 requires the Alabama Department of Human Resources to submit a Work Verification Plan to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for approval. The Alabama Department of Human Resources must comply with its approved Work Verification Plan to ensure accur...
Finding: 45 CFR Section 261 .63 requires the Alabama Department of Human Resources to submit a Work Verification Plan to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for approval. The Alabama Department of Human Resources must comply with its approved Work Verification Plan to ensure accuracy in reporting work activities by work eligible individuals on the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Data Report. Data for work participation activities are used in calculating work participation rates. During our testing of 25 TANF cases, we found two cases in which the hours reported for an individual participating in a work activity were inaccurate. The Department of Human Resources failed to ensure accuracy of data for work participation activities which may result in an inaccurate work participation rate. This is a significant deficiency in internal controls. The Department of Human Resources did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the information included on the TANF Data Report is accurate. Recommendation: The Department of Human Resources should establish and maintain effective internal controls to ensure accuracy in reporting work activities by work-eligible individuals on the TANF Data Report. Response/Views: We disagree. The finding statement declares that the Department of Human Resources failed to ensure accuracy of data for work participation activities which may result in an inaccurate work participation rate. This is a significant deficiency in internal controls. The Department of Human Resources did not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that the information included on the TANF Data Report is accurate. We do agree with the findings of two cases "in which the hours reported for an individual participating in a work activity were inaccurate." We agree that the 2 of the 25 cases selected had the incorrect frequency for the number of employment hours entered which could potentially affect the work participation rate for Alabama. Corrective Action Planned: The two cases which involved an error in the frequency of the hours reported appear to be isolated and inadvertent in nature. Our policy requires verification and calculation of employment hours at the beginning of employment and reverification and calculation of employment hours in the fifth month of employment. Based on our JOBS policy, your review of 25 cases, potentially represents up to 200 calculations and your findings indicate only 2 calculation errors. Furthermore, our research indicates that the errors in the two cases addressed in your findings did not have an affect on the State's overall Work Participation Rate. Additionally, we believe our supervisory reviews as well as a percentage of record rereviews remain the best way to monitor accuracy of information entered in our system while basic and refresher training remains the course of prevention for information prior to entry into the system. Basic training for each new employee involves two weeks of intense, in person, interactive training. Refresher training or one to one support is provided as needed or requested by county staff. The official policy and automation helpdesk are staffed by specialists, who responds to questions daily. County consultants also perform re-reviews of the county's reviews and provide guidance as observed or requested. The stated purpose of these processes is to ensure systematic review of the work done in the family assistance program; to identify worker problems; to identify error trends and concentrations; and to monitor program performance. At the county level information from that process can be used for worker performance assessment, local corrective action, to train new workers, to identify areas of strengths and weaknesses of staff. At the State level the process provides information to monitor program performance to include identifying problems and error trends by county, region and statewide. Analysis of this data provides a way to determine training needs and to evaluate performance standards and the impact of program changes. The Division case record re-review process of the work of the supervisor provides yet another level of oversight to address the issues. Resulting corrective action from these reviews both at the County and State Office level can include additional individual worker or general staff training, program clarifications, as well as attention to the specific cases identified. Longstanding practice of such activity and experience tells us the process does prevent, detect, and correct errors. These errors have been discussed with the county worker and supervisor for case corrective action. Finally, DHR is in the final stages of development of a new TANF and JOBS system and we have requested that the hours of participation field require a question regarding the frequency of hours listed. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024. Contact Person(s): Fannie Ashley or Tessa Mitchell
Finding 501220 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Finding: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Pub. L. No. 110-252, hereafter referred to as the “Transparency Act” that is codified in 2 CFR Part 170, requires recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperativ...
Finding: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) (Pub. L. No. 109-282), as amended by Section 6202 of Pub. L. No. 110-252, hereafter referred to as the “Transparency Act” that is codified in 2 CFR Part 170, requires recipients (i.e., direct recipients) of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System. The Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix XI Compliance Supplement, May 2023, requires the ALSDE to report applicable first-tier subawards and contract information as required in the “Transparency Act.” The ALSDE did not report applicable first-tier subawards and contractors subject to FFATA data for the monitored grants in the FSRS pursuant to Federal Regulations. The ALSDE did not have procedures in place to ensure that applicable first-tier subaward information was reported to the FSRS, resulting in a failure to provide a full disclosure to the public of all entities or organizations receiving federal funds during the fiscal year 2023. Recommendation: The ALSDE should develop, maintain, and implement effective procedures to ensure compliance with the FFATA. Response/Views: The finding reads as if the ALSDE did not report FFATA for the monitored grants. It was explained to us that this was just for 84.425. FFATA was reported for monitored grants with the exception of part of 84.425. There was a discrepancy in whether it should have been reported. Guidance with the United States Department of Education (USDE) indicated that if the Governor awarded GEER funds to a state agency with an agreement, then the state agency is responsible for reporting. If there is no agreement in place, then the responsibility falls to the Governor’s office. The ALSDE takes full responsibility for this finding. Corrective Action Planned: Steps are being taken to ensure all are aware of the ALSDE’s responsibility to treat 84.425 just as all other Federal awards required for FFATA reporting. These awards will be reported as we are currently doing per FSRS and Federal Regulations. Anticipated Completion Date: The ALSDE will have this corrected no later than 10/31/24. Contact Person(s): Lynn Shows, Accounting Director, lshows@alsde.edu, 334-699-4472
Corrective Action Plan:
Corrective Action Plan:
Agency department: Accounting
Agency department: Accounting
« 1 1017 1018 1020 1021 2148 »