Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
55,799
In database
Filtered Results
9,401
Matching current filters
Showing Page
259 of 377
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Significant Deficiency
Return of Title IV (R2T4) Errors Planned Corrective Action: Our process for identifying unofficial withdrawals begins with a report from our Workday software to identify students who had unearned credits in a semester at the conclusion of that semester, after the grade due date. We then reach out to...
Return of Title IV (R2T4) Errors Planned Corrective Action: Our process for identifying unofficial withdrawals begins with a report from our Workday software to identify students who had unearned credits in a semester at the conclusion of that semester, after the grade due date. We then reach out to the individual professors of the courses and/or the Instructional Design team to determine if each student completed the semester or if (s)he had unearned credits having ceased attending at some point during the semester. If the student ceased attending, we would determine if a Return of Title IV (R2T4) calculation was needed and would complete it if necessary. The report was corrected for AY 2022/2023 to include No Credit (NC), Incomplete (I) and Failed (F) grades to enable PLNU to identify all the students who need to be reviewed going forward. In addition, we have added to our process instructions to run this report after the grades for module 1 are due, and after the grades for module 2 are due, rather than at the end of each semester. This was intended to ensure the review of any unofficial withdrawals in a timelier manner, meeting the 45-day deadline for any possible returns that must be made. The modified report, however, produced a far greater number of students for review, which was too broad of a selection and was unmanageable. We are working to refine the reporting criteria further to accurately identify students who require review and we have assigned additional staff for the review process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Daniel Reed, Director of Financial Aid; Joanna Castro, Associate Director of Financial Aid; Jamie Asche, Director of Student Financial Services Business Analysis and Compliance Anticipated Date of Completion: 1/1/2024
Finding 2023-001 Lack of Internal Control over Reporting Name of Contact: Jim Holien Corrective Action Plan: Corrective Action Plan: The district will develop FFATA reporting policies and procedures to submit subaward award information through FSRS to ensure compliance with FFATA requirements. ...
Finding 2023-001 Lack of Internal Control over Reporting Name of Contact: Jim Holien Corrective Action Plan: Corrective Action Plan: The district will develop FFATA reporting policies and procedures to submit subaward award information through FSRS to ensure compliance with FFATA requirements. Proposed Completion Date: June 30, 2024
Current Year Findings Corrective Action Plan 2023-001 Improper application of sliding fee discount CFDA Nos. – 93.224 and 93.527 Federal Award ID # and Year – 5 H80CS00744-21-00 Program Year 2023 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of finding Significant deficiency...
Current Year Findings Corrective Action Plan 2023-001 Improper application of sliding fee discount CFDA Nos. – 93.224 and 93.527 Federal Award ID # and Year – 5 H80CS00744-21-00 Program Year 2023 Federal Agency Name: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Type of finding Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance (recurring) Criteria or Specific Requirement Special Tests and Provisions: Sliding Fee Discounts per Title 42 Chapter 1 Subchapter D Section 51c303(f) Condition The Organization’s sliding fee program provides discounts on patient services based upon the individual’s level of income. However, the Organization applied the incorrect discount based upon the individual’s income per the Organizations sliding fee discount policy. Cause Clerical error in applying the sliding fee discount adjustment in the billing system for the patient. Effect or Potential Effect Improper sliding fee discounts given to patients. Questioned Costs None Context or Perspective Information A sample of 40 patients were tested out of the total population of 2,283 encounters. The sampling methodology used is not statistically valid. Two patients received the incorrect sliding fee discount based upon their income level. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization implement a verification process to ensure the sliding fee discounts being applied are in accordance with their sliding fee policy. Corrective Action Plan Hidalgo Medical Services (HMS) will implement an enhanced training program to ensure the sliding fee discounts are applied in accordance with the current sliding fee policy. A comprehensive re-training of current Patient Financial Services (PFS) Claims Reviewing staff will occur by December 2023. A training manual will be developed to include competency validation for each Claims Reviewer staff person, and the new training model will be used for all future Claims Reviewer staff. In addition, HMS will continue to use the training manual for all incoming Community Health Workers to ensure the sliding fee assessment continues to stay in compliance. 35 Main Clinic & Administration P.O. Box 550 530 DeMoss Street Lordsburg, NM 88045 Secondly, HMS will implement an enhanced training program and verification process to ensure the sliding fee discounts are applied in accordance with the current sliding fee policy. The Claims Reviewer Supervisor will randomly select at least 30% of SFS patient visits monthly to ensure billing adjustment accuracy. HMS has been working diligently over the last year to improve the sliding fee assessments, and all proper documentation has been obtained (the new auditing requirement will occur immediately). There were no findings this year on assessments, and we will apply a similar audit process and follow-up action plan to the billing adjustment process. Also, all errors found will be fixed right away. The Claims Reviewer Supervisor will report each month to the Chief Operating Officer (COO) the audit results, and the COO will report to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) any findings and required corrections, if applicable. In addition, the Finance Director will continue randomly auditing the sliding fee assessments each month to ensure compliance with the program. The Chief Financial Officer will report each month to the CEO any findings and required correction, if applicable. Person Responsible: Sonia Jacquez, Claims Reviewer Supervisor, Teresa Carrasco, Patient Specialist Services Director, Amanda Frost, Chief Operating Officer, Jamie McMahen, Finance Director, and Gretchen Cannon, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2023.
Name of Contact Person: Daniel Schuler, Business and Operations Manager Corrective Action Plan: The District did identify in late spring/early summer that the existing relationship with US Foods had not been bid in the prior year. In order to address this issue, the District Administration identifi...
Name of Contact Person: Daniel Schuler, Business and Operations Manager Corrective Action Plan: The District did identify in late spring/early summer that the existing relationship with US Foods had not been bid in the prior year. In order to address this issue, the District Administration identified, recommended and received Board of Education approval to access a US Foods State of Alaska Contract with the State of Alaska Department of Corrections. This action, coupled with the one-year extension of an existing agreement with Alaskan & Proud Markets for the purchase of milk, will bring the District into compliance with procurement procedures as outlined by the National School Lunch Program and DEED. Proposed Completion Date: December 2023.
Incorrect Pell Calculations Planned Corrective Action: Anderson University will update course withdrawal forms to include documentation from professors of last date of attendance and affirmation of whether or not the student began the course they are dropping. The Office of Financial Aid and Scholar...
Incorrect Pell Calculations Planned Corrective Action: Anderson University will update course withdrawal forms to include documentation from professors of last date of attendance and affirmation of whether or not the student began the course they are dropping. The Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships will receive all completed withdrawal forms to review for changes to academic level and any necessary return of federal aid. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: David J. Sarah, Director Anticipated Date of Completion: N/A
View Audit 3116 Questioned Costs: $1
Procedures to support reported values for PRF as well as any other reporting have been implemented.
Procedures to support reported values for PRF as well as any other reporting have been implemented.
U.S. Department of Education Concordia University, Nebraska respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2023. Audit period: July 01, 2022 - June 30, 2023 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are nu...
U.S. Department of Education Concordia University, Nebraska respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2023. Audit period: July 01, 2022 - June 30, 2023 The findings from the schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS—FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT There were no financial statement findings in the current year. FINDINGS—FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS U.S. Department of Education 2023-001 Student Financial Assistance Cluster – Assistance Listing No. Various Recommendation: We recommend the University evaluate its procedures and a policy around how level of education is determined and verified when packaging and awarding students. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: David L Kumm, Executive VP CFO/COO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 7/1/2022
View Audit 3010 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1611 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Condition: While performing single audit procedures it was noticed that the ESSER funds were used to purchase the equipment for the building upgrades that were also split with the Sinking Fund. Per the Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients that use Education Stabilization Funds for mi...
Condition: While performing single audit procedures it was noticed that the ESSER funds were used to purchase the equipment for the building upgrades that were also split with the Sinking Fund. Per the Compliance Supplement, recipients and subrecipients that use Education Stabilization Funds for minor use laborers and mechanics must meet Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Corrective Steps to be Taken: The School District will work with the attorney and the contractor to add the proper language to the contract. Monitoring: The plan for monitoring adherence is that the Superintendent and Director of Financial Services will work with contractors to guarantee that all Davis-Bacon required prevailing wage language will be in contracts with federal funding. Name of Responsible Person for Further Information: Brad Reyburn, Superintendent and Julie Reams, Director of Financial Services Questioned Costs Related to this Finding: None Anticipated Completion Date: Prior to the start of the July 1, 2024 fiscal year.
2023-002: Late Return of Title IV Credit Balance - Student Financial Aid Cluster Assistance Listing #s 84.007, 84.033, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268, 84.379, 93.264- Grant Period - Year Ended June 30, 2023 Condition Found: During our Credit Balance testing, we noted that the University did not return the c...
2023-002: Late Return of Title IV Credit Balance - Student Financial Aid Cluster Assistance Listing #s 84.007, 84.033, 84.038, 84.063, 84.268, 84.379, 93.264- Grant Period - Year Ended June 30, 2023 Condition Found: During our Credit Balance testing, we noted that the University did not return the credit balances for two out of forty students we tested within the required time frame. We consider the untimely return of credit balance to the students accounts to be a significant deficiency to the Special Tests and Provisions Compliance Requirement. Corrective Action Plan - The refund date is calculated manually. There was a miscommunication in the department and refunds were processed at 16 days instead of the required 14. Staff have been retrained and will start the refund process sooner. Responsible Person for Corrective Action Plan - Karrie Mallo, Director of Student Accounts Implementation Date of Corrective Action Plan - Action has already been completed. Staff have been retrained. The Director of Student Accounts will review all calculated refund dates.
Inaccurate and Untimely Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4) Planned Corrective Action: Context: The financial aid staff will continue to take advantage of the training resources provided by the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA) to ensure understanding of the newer re...
Inaccurate and Untimely Return of Title IV Funds (R2T4) Planned Corrective Action: Context: The financial aid staff will continue to take advantage of the training resources provided by the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA) to ensure understanding of the newer regulations related to R2T4 calculations for modular-based programs. They will also ensure that our internal R2T4 procedure document is accurate and that it is followed as a guide when completing calculations for these programs. And lastly, the team will have two trained aid administrators review R2T4 calculations, specifically for the modular-based programs (online and graduate students), to monitor for accuracy. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Cindi Patterson, Director for Financial Aid Anticipated Date of Completion: October 2023
View Audit 2823 Questioned Costs: $1
Disbursements to Ineligible Students Planned Corrective Action: While the Office of Financial Aid sought to replicate controls that were in place within the legacy system, the noted disbursements to ineligible students were a direct result of the system conversion to Workday. The following measures ...
Disbursements to Ineligible Students Planned Corrective Action: While the Office of Financial Aid sought to replicate controls that were in place within the legacy system, the noted disbursements to ineligible students were a direct result of the system conversion to Workday. The following measures have been or will be taken to prevent such disbursements in the future. Transfer credit evaluation (prior degree and TEACH grant) To ensure students with prior bachelor’s degrees are not awarded incorrectly, the office will coordinate with the Registrar’s Office to ensure that all undergraduate students with a prior degree are flagged immediately after transcript evaluation. The transfer credit coordinator will notify the Office of Financial Aid. If the student’s ISIR does not reflect they have earned a prior bachelor’s degree the student will be notified and the ISIR will be corrected. Existing award programming prevents students with ISIRs indicating a prior degree from being awarded aid for which they are ineligible. To ensure transfer students with GPAs that do not meet the requirements to receive TEACH grant are not awarded incorrectly, the office will conduct a review of all transfer students awarded TEACH grant once all their transcripts have been received to ensure they meet transfer GPA eligibility requirements. Loans in excess of limits To ensure students are not awarded loans in excess of their aggregate limits, the financial aid operations department has begun to proactively review NSLDS data for any student that is seen to be approaching loan limits. When an ISIR indicates an eligibility amount that is less than a single year’s maximum award, the operations department reviews NSLDS and overrides aggregate totals as needed to ensure students are not awarded over their limits. We are going to work with our post-implementation consulting partner, Alchemy, to determine other best practices within Workday. Pell Grant awarded for courses that do not apply to student’s program of study To ensure students are not awarded Pell grant for courses that do not apply to their program of study, the office developed reports to compare the financial aid load used to calculate the award with the financial aid loan within the student’s program of study. While these reports were in use during the 2022-2023 award year, there were some academic programs that had to be updated because of issues with their initial setup. Those changes have abated in this second academic year, but the financial aid technician will conduct a final check in the last week of the 7A and 7B terms so any changes to program of study load status can be reevaluated. Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Michael Sapienza, Associate Vice President of Enrollment Services Anticipated Date of Completion: Necessary reports and calculations will be developed prior to December 1, 2023. Review will continue on a continuous basis.
View Audit 2820 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2023-005: Late Reporting and Noncompliance with Reporting Requirements Name of Contact Person: Melinda Bass, Business Manager Corrective Action Plan: The preliminary audit states that each school district must submit an Impact Aid application annually by January 31 at 11:59pm Eastern T...
Finding 2023-005: Late Reporting and Noncompliance with Reporting Requirements Name of Contact Person: Melinda Bass, Business Manager Corrective Action Plan: The preliminary audit states that each school district must submit an Impact Aid application annually by January 31 at 11:59pm Eastern Time. During Altman, Rogers & Co.’s review of CCSD’s FY 24 application, Altman, Rogers & Co. notes a significant deficiency because CCSD’s application was not submitted until February 1, 2023. CCSD discovered there was a discrepancy with the instructions for our FY 24 Impact Aid application between what was provided on the Impact Aid website for Section 7003 Application Instructions and a slide presentation that the U.S. Department of Education developed for Impact Aid Applications. CCSD’s Business Manager, Melinda Bass, followed the instructions on the Impact Aid website that stated that Impact Aid applications will be placed in a “Waiting Signature” status and the LEA user will be notified by email that they would have a task waiting. CCSD Business Manager, Melinda Bass, followed these instructions and then unfortunately discovered the discrepancy between the website and slide presentation. CCSD submitted our FY 24 Impact Aid application on time by the January 31 deadline, however, because we were waiting for email confirmation, the application wasn’t signed by the January 31 deadline and was signed on February 1. CCSD disagrees with this item being considered a significant deficiency. Moving forward, CCSD will ensure all Impact Aid applications are submitted and signed by the January 31 deadline.
Finding 1312 (2023-003)
Significant Deficiency 2023
College Work Study – Assistance Listing No. 84.033 Recommendation: We recommend the College implement policies to review all student award packages at the start of the academic year to ensure no overawards exist. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action ...
College Work Study – Assistance Listing No. 84.033 Recommendation: We recommend the College implement policies to review all student award packages at the start of the academic year to ensure no overawards exist. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Federal Work Study (FWS) earnings are tracked in the payroll department and reported to Student Financial Services (SFS) on a monthly basis. In November 2022, Union College hired a new Payroll Accountant who failed to provide FWS earnings to SFS after her hire date. Had SFS been notified of the actual amount the student earned, the department would have increased the award. The Controller in the Accounting office is aware of the lack of competence in this position, and took steps to ensure this finding does not come up in future years. A new Payroll Accountant was hired in October 2023. The new employee has many years of higher-education experience, including work with financial award packages. The Controller believes this will be a positive change for the Accounting office, and believes this finding will be eliminated in FY24. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Steve Trana, VP for Financial Administration Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 31, 2023
View Audit 2445 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 1310 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Perkins Promissory Notes – Assistance Listing No. 84.038 Recommendation: We recommend that the College put a procedure in place to ensure that all students have a promissory note prior to disbursing of funds. Also recommend a procedure be put in place to ensure proper record retention documenting th...
Perkins Promissory Notes – Assistance Listing No. 84.038 Recommendation: We recommend that the College put a procedure in place to ensure that all students have a promissory note prior to disbursing of funds. Also recommend a procedure be put in place to ensure proper record retention documenting the completion of promissory note. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The process Union College follows to ensure promissory notes are signed is coordinated through Student Financial Services (SFS). SFS determines eligibility of awards and adds them to the student financial package. Once a loan has been accepted SFS has the student sign the promissory note. The loan is disbursed once the paperwork has been completed and reviewed. Perkins loans followed this procedure in the time they were available. The Perkins program is no longer active so there are no new promissory notes going forward. Student accounts is currently reviewing student files to ensure promissory notes, or documentation deemed appropriate by the Department of Education, are available for the Perkins loans that will be assigned to the Department of Education. Unfortunately, previous employees did not keep accurate records; this was brought to light when a new employee took over student accounts in August 2021. While the new employee has worked hard to track down all MPNs, we know that there are some that will never be found. As a result, this will likely be a repeat finding until all Perkins Loans are assigned or liquidated. It is our hope that this process will be completed by May 31, 2025. Promissory notes or documentation will be retained until the loans are either assigned or liquidated. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Steve Trana, VP for Financial Administration Planned completion date for corrective action plan: We hope to assign or liquidate all Perkins loans by May 31, 2025. Until then, it is likely that this will be a recurring item on our corrective action report.
Finding 2023-003 Considered a significant deficiency Recommendation: It is recommended that the Township implement written policies and procedures over significant internal control areas. Action to be taken: We agree with the finding and are in the process of implementing written policies and proced...
Finding 2023-003 Considered a significant deficiency Recommendation: It is recommended that the Township implement written policies and procedures over significant internal control areas. Action to be taken: We agree with the finding and are in the process of implementing written policies and procedures over significant internal control areas including federal award programs.
Findings 2023-001 & 2023-002 Considered a significant deficiency Recommendation: It is recommended that the Township acquire the expertise necessary to complete the year-end accounting procedures, to prepare the Township’s accounting records needed for the audit, and to prepare the annual financial ...
Findings 2023-001 & 2023-002 Considered a significant deficiency Recommendation: It is recommended that the Township acquire the expertise necessary to complete the year-end accounting procedures, to prepare the Township’s accounting records needed for the audit, and to prepare the annual financial statements including the required disclosures in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Action to be taken: We acknowledge these findings and agree that these recommendations would help strengthen internal controls. However, due to the cost of implementing these recommendations, we believe the cost of obtaining the necessary expertise would out-weigh the benefit. We will continue to request assistance from our financial statement auditors for these nonattest services.
Findings 2023-001 & 2023-002 Considered a significant deficiency Recommendation: It is recommended that the Township acquire the expertise necessary to complete the year-end accounting procedures, to prepare the Township’s accounting records needed for the audit, and to prepare the annual financial ...
Findings 2023-001 & 2023-002 Considered a significant deficiency Recommendation: It is recommended that the Township acquire the expertise necessary to complete the year-end accounting procedures, to prepare the Township’s accounting records needed for the audit, and to prepare the annual financial statements including the required disclosures in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Action to be taken: We acknowledge these findings and agree that these recommendations would help strengthen internal controls. However, due to the cost of implementing these recommendations, we believe the cost of obtaining the necessary expertise would out-weigh the benefit. We will continue to request assistance from our financial statement auditors for these nonattest services.
The Southern States Energy Board respectfully submits the following corrective action plan to incorporate a revision to our FY2023 policies and procedures that would provide additional tracking for the FSRS reporting requirement for subawards. The single finding is identified and discussed below. ...
The Southern States Energy Board respectfully submits the following corrective action plan to incorporate a revision to our FY2023 policies and procedures that would provide additional tracking for the FSRS reporting requirement for subawards. The single finding is identified and discussed below. Finding-Federal Award Finding: 2023 – 001 Improve Controls over Transparency Act Compliance Requirement: Reporting Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Energy Federal Program Name: Transportation of Transuranic Wastes to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Assistance Listing Number: 81.106 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: DE-EM0005215 - 2020 Award Period: 7/01/2020 – 6/30/2025 Budget Period: 07/01/2022-06/30/2023 Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the isolated audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Management developed a checklist for subaward amendments, prior to the receipt of the finding and upon identification that this report had been overlooked for Budget Period 3 for award DE-EM0005215-2020. Effective immediately, funds obligated to subawardees through subaward agreements, will be reported per the grant requirement to the FSRS and recognized in the FFATA Financial Reporting system. The project identified is a five-year project and the first two Budget Periods were submitted in a timely manner as per the project’s reporting requirements. Due to the nature of this award being incrementally funded, obligations to subawards are continuous throughout each budget period as funds are designated by the prime award. Therefore, the typical quarterly reporting system controls did not trigger management to complete this along with all the other financial and technical quarterly and annual submissions. Therefore, the FY2023 FSRS reporting requirement for this project was overlooked due to unusual timeliness of sub modifications and the workload of the accounting department. With the revised tracking/checklist for each subaward that includes modifications for incremental funding, this will no longer be an issue. Management would also like to note that all other reporting requirements were submitted on time and consistent with financial reporting requirements and that this was an isolated issue within Budget Period 3 for award DE-EM0005215-2020. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Leigh Hawkins, Assistant Director of Business Operations, and Kathy Sammons, Director of Business Operations. Current Status: The planned completion date for corrective action plan is September 30, 2023. All submissions were completed prior to the final audit report completion. Therefore, management considers this issue fully corrected.
Grants Accountant received training from a certified public accountant / housing authority specialist to ensure the restricted net position (RNP) monthly reconciliation. All HAP and administrative equity balances are now properly stated.
Grants Accountant received training from a certified public accountant / housing authority specialist to ensure the restricted net position (RNP) monthly reconciliation. All HAP and administrative equity balances are now properly stated.
Update policies and procedures for NSPIRE Inspections to ensure any extensions for repairs are adequately documented within the participant’s files. (Paper and electronic)
Update policies and procedures for NSPIRE Inspections to ensure any extensions for repairs are adequately documented within the participant’s files. (Paper and electronic)
Housing and Urban Development uses an Inventory Management System to review and monitor information submitted by public housing authorities through the 50058 form which is the system of record. To assist Scottsdale Housing Agency, HUD has developed the Public Information Center (PIC) Error Dashboard...
Housing and Urban Development uses an Inventory Management System to review and monitor information submitted by public housing authorities through the 50058 form which is the system of record. To assist Scottsdale Housing Agency, HUD has developed the Public Information Center (PIC) Error Dashboard that provides a summary analysis and overview of PIC errors. The PIC errors needing correction are updated on the first Tuesday of each month for Public Housing Agencies (PHA) to review and correct. The PIC errors identified were corrected in June 2023 through the monthly review and PIC submission. On average once corrections are submitted it takes 60‐90 days for the correction to be recognized and removed from the system. The Housing Choice Voucher Supervisor meets with the Housing Specialist monthly and resolves all PIC errors as a team effort.
Program Income of $310,165 was recognized during FY 2022‐2023 through a substantial amendment to the Annual Action Plan adopted by the Mayor and City Council in January 2023. The Community Assistance Office followed the recommended guidelines of the Citizen Participation Plan to complete a substanti...
Program Income of $310,165 was recognized during FY 2022‐2023 through a substantial amendment to the Annual Action Plan adopted by the Mayor and City Council in January 2023. The Community Assistance Office followed the recommended guidelines of the Citizen Participation Plan to complete a substantial amendment as mandated. All program income was receipted correctly into the Integrated and Information Disbursement System (IDIS) for HUD. All program income funds have been reconciled through the Consolidated Action Plan 2020‐2025 and accurate PR26 have been completed and submitted through weekly meetings with the assigned representative since June of 2023.
The Community Assistance Office completed a Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Environmental Review audit on February 14, 2023, resulting in a Corrective Action Plan to pay back funding for a statutory and regulatory violation of failure to retain an Authority to Use Grant Funds. A Corrective Actio...
The Community Assistance Office completed a Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Environmental Review audit on February 14, 2023, resulting in a Corrective Action Plan to pay back funding for a statutory and regulatory violation of failure to retain an Authority to Use Grant Funds. A Corrective Action Plan was submitted to HUD on March 10, 2023, that included the following most notable items: 1) Update environmental review policies to ensure compliance with 24CFR 58.22 with financial controls, retention, and the funding process, 2) Repayment of $255,750 to the CDBG line of credit and ensure no future CDBG funds are used for this purpose and 3) Staff training and development. Community Development Block Grant staff, including the supervisor and manager complete a webbased instruction system for environmental reviews through the HUD Exchange as recommended by October 31, 2023. In September 2023 two staff members attended an in person Environmental Review Training in San Francisco, CA through the Office of Environment and Energy. The $255,750 was repaid to the line of credit in two installments in June 2023 and August 2023. These funds will be re‐programmed for future eligible CDBG funding activities in the Annual Action Plan for FY 2024‐2025. Community Assistance Policies for financial controls, retention and the funding process will be updated and completed by January 1, 2024.
View Audit 2251 Questioned Costs: $1
Complete all PR26 and PR29 for CDBG and CV by November 17, 2023. The Community Assistance Office met with Housing and Urban Development on a weekly basis to reconcile grant funds within the 2020‐2025 Five‐Year Consolidated Action Plan beginning June 9, 2023. Training was provided to Community Assist...
Complete all PR26 and PR29 for CDBG and CV by November 17, 2023. The Community Assistance Office met with Housing and Urban Development on a weekly basis to reconcile grant funds within the 2020‐2025 Five‐Year Consolidated Action Plan beginning June 9, 2023. Training was provided to Community Assistance Office staff through Housing and Urban Development and through Cloudburst Consulting to ensure key staff positions responsible for the completion of these reports is full trained. Develop a Master Calendar for the Community Assistance Office with re‐occurring reports to include the PR26, PR29 and including FFATA to ensure they are completed accurately and timely. PR26 for CDBG and PR29 for CDBG and CDBG‐CV have been submitted as of October 25, 2023, and the HUD concluded weekly meetings with the Scottsdale Community Assistance Office on October 20, 2023. PR26 for CDBG‐CV will be completed and submitted by November 17, 2023. Policies will be updated to reflect 2 CFR 170 requiring the City to submit subaward information through the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act by the end of the month subsequent to an award.
Contact Person Kelsie Harris, Business Manager Corrective Action Plan The issue has been corrected by developing a process to save all MOE documentation in one central location (not email accounts) by both the business manager and director so that the information can be readily collected when reques...
Contact Person Kelsie Harris, Business Manager Corrective Action Plan The issue has been corrected by developing a process to save all MOE documentation in one central location (not email accounts) by both the business manager and director so that the information can be readily collected when requested. Completion Date Souris Valley Special Services will implement when it becomes cost effective
« 1 257 258 260 261 377 »