Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,491
In database
Filtered Results
20,725
Matching current filters
Showing Page
119 of 829
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Reporting
Based on the recommendation, Management agrees with the finding and will ensure all requested information is available for the auditor in order to facilitate timely completion of the audit by March 31.
Based on the recommendation, Management agrees with the finding and will ensure all requested information is available for the auditor in order to facilitate timely completion of the audit by March 31.
Based on the recommendation, management anticipates taking actions such as updating its process for recording transactions, addressing cutoff, and implementing a more rigorous review process to ensure compliance. In addition, management will prepare information on federal awards to determine whether...
Based on the recommendation, management anticipates taking actions such as updating its process for recording transactions, addressing cutoff, and implementing a more rigorous review process to ensure compliance. In addition, management will prepare information on federal awards to determine whether a Single Audit is necessary and prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards as part of preparation for future audits.
Based on the recommendation, management anticipates taking actions such as updating its process for recording transactions, addressing cutoff, and implementing a more rigorous review process to ensure compliance.
Based on the recommendation, management anticipates taking actions such as updating its process for recording transactions, addressing cutoff, and implementing a more rigorous review process to ensure compliance.
The Organization should develop a compliance calendar that includes financial reporting deadlines and set automatic reminders in advance of each deadline to aid in properly planning and timing submission of reporting packages. Additionally, the Organization should engage the audit firm well before t...
The Organization should develop a compliance calendar that includes financial reporting deadlines and set automatic reminders in advance of each deadline to aid in properly planning and timing submission of reporting packages. Additionally, the Organization should engage the audit firm well before the fiscal year end, and the auditors should put this engagement on their calendar well in advance of the due date. The Organization should establish a timeline with the auditors that aligns with internal deadlines to ensure sufficient time to conduct the audit. The Organization’s Board of Directors should be more actively engaged in the auditing and reporting process to establish a greater degree of accountability and oversight. Anticipated Completion Date: 09/30/2026 Actions Taken: The Organization has begun implementing the above-mentioned recommendations. The Organization will ensure that it has a working compliance calendar to assist in meeting the reporting deadline. Additionally, the Organization has engaged the audit firm for their upcoming fiscal year-end, and the audit firm has put it on its calendar to begin the audit process well in advance. The Organization’s board of directors has agreed to oversee the auditing and reporting processes to a greater extent. With these actions, the Organization expects to comply with the Uniform Guidance for single audits deadline for the fiscal year end December 31, 2025. Mr. Joel Stein, executive director, has been designated to monitor the plan of corrective action for this finding. He can be reached at 845-356-2761. Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joel Stein, Executive Director
Corrective Action Plan:The City will implement procedures to review all grant agreements and funding documentation to identify federal awards subject to Uniform Guidance requirements. The City will also establish a monitoring process for federal reporting deadlines and coordinate with its external a...
Corrective Action Plan:The City will implement procedures to review all grant agreements and funding documentation to identify federal awards subject to Uniform Guidance requirements. The City will also establish a monitoring process for federal reporting deadlines and coordinate with its external auditor to ensure the reporting package is submitted timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.Anticipated Completion Date:Immediately implemented for future reporting periods.
2024-14 Segregation of Duties Material Weakness Recommendation: We recommend that management and the governing board be aware of the lack of segregation of duties and implement controls whenever possible to mitigate this risk. The governing board should remove the finance manager from the list of ch...
2024-14 Segregation of Duties Material Weakness Recommendation: We recommend that management and the governing board be aware of the lack of segregation of duties and implement controls whenever possible to mitigate this risk. The governing board should remove the finance manager from the list of check signers. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this finding and will implement this recommendation within 120 days of this audit report.
2024-012 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Material Weakness Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written reconciliation and tie-in procedures into its financial policies and procedures manual. These policies should require timely reconciliations to take place as de...
2024-012 Financial Statement Reconciliations/Tie-In Procedures Material Weakness Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written reconciliation and tie-in procedures into its financial policies and procedures manual. These policies should require timely reconciliations to take place as defined under policy. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this finding and will implement this recommendation within 120 days of this audit report.
2024-011 Timely Grant Draws Material Weakness Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written grant draw policies into its financial policies and procedures manual. Financials should be reviewed monthly, and drawdowns made as needed. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this fi...
2024-011 Timely Grant Draws Material Weakness Recommendation: The Housing Authority should adopt written grant draw policies into its financial policies and procedures manual. Financials should be reviewed monthly, and drawdowns made as needed. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this finding and will implement this recommendation within 120 days of this audit report.
2024-009 Late Audit Submission Material Weakness Recommendation: Ensure your books are closed in a timely fashion and schedule audit work to begin early enough so that your reporting package will be submitted on time. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this finding and will implement th...
2024-009 Late Audit Submission Material Weakness Recommendation: Ensure your books are closed in a timely fashion and schedule audit work to begin early enough so that your reporting package will be submitted on time. Action Taken: The Housing Authority agrees with this finding and will implement this recommendation within 120 days of this audit report.
Condition: Controls were not designed or implemented effectively to ensure: 1. Mortgage and escrow payments were made in accordance with the due dates and amounts specified in the executed mortgage note agreement. 2. Earnings are retained in the replacement reserve account 3. The organization comple...
Condition: Controls were not designed or implemented effectively to ensure: 1. Mortgage and escrow payments were made in accordance with the due dates and amounts specified in the executed mortgage note agreement. 2. Earnings are retained in the replacement reserve account 3. The organization completes the required financial reports in accordance with the applicable accounting basis, supported by underlying records representing the activity for the period reported. Planned Corrective Action: Management will design and implement internal controls to ensure compliance with mortgage escrow payments, reserve account funding, and quarterly financial reporting requirements, including a process to ensure that documentation of reviews is retained. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Louise Arzu, Vice President, Finance Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026
Condition: The Organization did not submit the budget to HUD within 30 days of the start of its fiscal year. Planned Corrective Action: Management has implemented a new review and oversight process related to the process for the budget submissions in question to ensure timely submission on a go-forw...
Condition: The Organization did not submit the budget to HUD within 30 days of the start of its fiscal year. Planned Corrective Action: Management has implemented a new review and oversight process related to the process for the budget submissions in question to ensure timely submission on a go-forward basis. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Louise Arzu, Vice President, Finance Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2026
4. Deficiency #4 – Federal Grant Reporting a. Type of deficiency: Material Weakness – During our testing of the Port’s BUILD reporting requirements, we noted the SF-425 reports were not filed for the fiscal year. We recommend the Port file SF-425s timely. b. The due dates of all federal grants have ...
4. Deficiency #4 – Federal Grant Reporting a. Type of deficiency: Material Weakness – During our testing of the Port’s BUILD reporting requirements, we noted the SF-425 reports were not filed for the fiscal year. We recommend the Port file SF-425s timely. b. The due dates of all federal grants have been added to the finance calendar and are being filed timely. c. Already implemented.
3. Deficiency #3 – Federal Grant Reporting a. Type of deficiency: Material Weakness – During our testing of the Port’s BUILD20 reporting requirements, we noted the SF-270 report dates were not accurate as a result of the associated expenditures being adjusted. We recommend the Port refiles affected ...
3. Deficiency #3 – Federal Grant Reporting a. Type of deficiency: Material Weakness – During our testing of the Port’s BUILD20 reporting requirements, we noted the SF-270 report dates were not accurate as a result of the associated expenditures being adjusted. We recommend the Port refiles affected SF-270 to match the reported expenditures for the fiscal year. b. The checklist noted in Deficiency #2 is also being used to make sure the SF-270s are correct. We are working with the Federal Highway Administration to see about refiling SF-270s. c. Already implemented.
Staff responsible for managing CDBG grants have received remedial training and are now aware of reporting deadlines. Additionally, all grant agreements are now required to be reported to the County Auditor's office or secondary review.
Staff responsible for managing CDBG grants have received remedial training and are now aware of reporting deadlines. Additionally, all grant agreements are now required to be reported to the County Auditor's office or secondary review.
Reference Numbers: 2024-001, 2023-001, and 2022-001 Federal Program: Direct - USDA Rural Utilities Service award; ALN 10.760, 'Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities' (Single Audit / Uniform Guidance).Condition: The Great Northwest Wholesale Water Commission did not complete and subm...
Reference Numbers: 2024-001, 2023-001, and 2022-001 Federal Program: Direct - USDA Rural Utilities Service award; ALN 10.760, 'Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities' (Single Audit / Uniform Guidance).Condition: The Great Northwest Wholesale Water Commission did not complete and submit its reporting package, including the SEFA and the single audit report, to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within nine months of the fiscal year end. Criteria: Under 2 CFR §200.512, the audit must be completed, and the data collection form and reporting package must be submitted within 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report, or nine months after the fiscal year end, whichever is earlier. Corrective Action Plan: Management acknowledges the finding and has implemented procedures to improve the timely completion and submission of the data collection form to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Management has engaged an audit firm to complete the December 31, 2022, 2023, and 2024 audits and will submit the reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse upon completion. Management will coordinate with the auditors throughout the audit process, monitor applicable reporting deadlines, and establish internal timelines to ensure the audit report and data collection form are submitted within the required time frame prescribed by 2 CFR 200.512(a). Personnel responsible for Corrective Action: Jerri Dearmont, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: August 18, 2026
Operation Hope has retained a new audit firm and developed a new schedule to ensure future audits are completed in a timely manner and reports are submitted by the due date.
Operation Hope has retained a new audit firm and developed a new schedule to ensure future audits are completed in a timely manner and reports are submitted by the due date.
Finding Number 2024-038 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ERA) AL #21.019 Planned Corrective Action Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) acknowledges subrecipient monitoring process lacked the strength and co...
Finding Number 2024-038 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ERA) AL #21.019 Planned Corrective Action Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) acknowledges subrecipient monitoring process lacked the strength and consistency to ensure subrecipients established and maintained effective internal control. OMES acknowledges that OMES did not implement the proper internal controls and oversight of the ERA Program during FY2024. However, OMES has taken steps to correct these findings and follow the recommendations set forth by SAI in these findings. Beginning with FY2025, OMES has taken the following measures: • OMES disagrees that they had sufficient and timely notice to make full corrective actions prior to this FY2024 audit for the following reasons: the FY2021 State auditor & Inspector (SAI) audit was released four days prior to the beginning of FY2024, the FY2022 SAI audit was released near the end of FY2025, and the FY2023 audit was released in FY2026; therefore, OMES could not take corrective action prior to the FY2024 audit began. At the beginning of FY2025, OMES began corrective measures as noted in SAI’s Condition and Context in this finding. • OMES acknowledges OMES subrecipient monitoring process lacked the strength and consistency to ensure subrecipients established and maintained effective internal control. However, OMES has taken steps to correct these findings and follow the recommendations set forth by SAI as noted in SAI’s Condition and Context in this finding. Beginning with FY2025, OMES has taken the following measures:  Oversight and management of the ERA program has been transferred to the OMES Grant Management Office (OMES-GMO) which has staff with several years of grant experience. OMES-GMO has recently hired additional staff, and the two staff members dedicated to the management of the ERA program have 20+ years of combined federal grant specific experience.  OMES ensured that the subrecipient agreement included all the required terms under the ERA Program and that the agreement does not expire, OMES-GMO and the Communities of Foundation of Oklahoma (CFO) executed an updated Subrecipient Grant Agreement Amendment that details the responsibilities of OMES to monitor CFO and the duties and processes that CFO must follow in regard to ERA Program, including detailed cash management policies.  OMES-GMO required the return of the remaining ERA2 Program funds from CFO to ensure proper oversight and review of ERA expenditures is performed.  OMES-GMO has in place a multi-level system of internal controls for grant management and oversight that includes routine monitoring, desk review, and site visits for all projects and associated project/administrative expenditures to ensure allowability, accuracy, and assist in the detection of fraud. For example, OMES-GMO’s process for disbursing funds to a subrecipient requires a written request from the subrecipient with supporting documentation, then OMES-GMO assigns a staff lead and secondary grant analyst to perform a primary and secondary review for compliance and to require additional supporting documentation if needed to approve the request. Once those reviews are completed and approved by the OMES-GMO staff, the Director of the OMES-GMO must approve the request before it is sent to the OMES Finance Division, who will then verify the calculated amount(s) before completing the disbursement to the subrecipient. These internal controls and policies have been implemented for the management and oversight of the ERA Program and provide a multilayer review that will prevent fraud and risk factors applicable to the ERA program. Additionally, the OMES-GMO staff assigned to the ERA program have the training and knowledge to ensure compliance with the Federal grant requirements.  Depending on the level of risk, OMES-GMO conducts monthly, bi-weekly or weekly meetings with each subrecipient to monitor the progress of projects and address any issues or changes that might impact the project. For the ERA Program, OMESGMO conducted bi-weekly monitoring meetings with CFO and reviewed documentation provided by CFO to ensure all ERA projects were eligible under the ERA guidelines and that CFO exercised the proper oversight over their subrecipients and spending. Anticipated Completion Date Completed Responsible Contact Person Brandy Manek
Finding Number 2024-020 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ERA) AL #21.019 Planned Corrective Action Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) acknowledges they did not implement the proper internal controls and ov...
Finding Number 2024-020 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ERA) AL #21.019 Planned Corrective Action Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) acknowledges they did not implement the proper internal controls and oversight of the ERA Program during FY2024. However, OMES has taken steps to correct these findings and has followed the recommendations set forth by SAI as evidenced in the Recommendation section of this finding. Beginning with FY2025, OMES has taken the following measures:  Oversight and management of the ERA program has been transferred to the OMES Grant Management Office (OMES-GMO) which has staff with several years of grant experience. OMES-GMO has recently hired additional staff, and the two staff members dedicated to the management of the ERA program have 20+ years of combined federal grant specific experience.  OMES ensured that the subrecipient agreement included all the required terms under the ERA Program and that the agreement does not expire, OMES-GMO and the Communities of Foundation of Oklahoma (CFO) executed an updated Subrecipient Grant Agreement Amendment that details the responsibilities of OMES to monitor CFO and the duties and processes that CFO must follow in regard to ERA Program, including detailed cash management policies.  OMES-GMO required the return of the remaining ERA2 Program funds from CFO to ensure proper oversight and review of ERA expenditures is performed.  OMES-GMO has in place a multi-level system of internal controls for grant management and oversight that includes routine monitoring, desk review, and site visits for all projects and associated project/administrative expenditures to ensure allowability, accuracy, and assist in the detection of fraud. For example, OMES-GMO’s process for disbursing funds to a subrecipient requires a written request from the subrecipient with supporting documentation, then OMES-GMO assigns a staff lead and secondary grant analyst to perform a primary and secondary review for compliance and to require additional supporting documentation if needed to approve the request. Once those reviews are completed and approved by the OMES-GMO staff, the Director of the OMES-GMO must approve the request before it is sent to the OMES Finance Division, who will then verify the calculated amount(s) before completing the disbursement to the subrecipient. These internal controls and policies have been implemented for the management and oversight of the ERA Program and provide a multilayer review that will prevent fraud and risk factors applicable to the ERA program. Additionally, the OMES-GMO staff assigned to the ERA program have the training and knowledge to ensure compliance with the Federal grant requirements. Depending on the level of risk, OMES-GMO conducts monthly, bi-weekly or weekly meetings with each subrecipient to monitor the progress of projects and address any issues or changes that might impact the project. For the ERA Program, OMES-GMO conducted bi-weekly monitoring meetings with CFO and reviewed documentation provided by CFO to ensure all ERA projects were eligible under the ERA guidelines and that CFO exercised the proper oversight over their subrecipients and spending. Anticipated Completion Date Completed Responsible Contact Person Brandy Manek
Finding Number 2024-014 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ERA) AL #21.019 Planned Corrective Action Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) partially concurs with these findings. • OMES disagrees that they had s...
Finding Number 2024-014 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ERA) AL #21.019 Planned Corrective Action Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services (OMES) partially concurs with these findings. • OMES disagrees that they had sufficient and timely notice to make full corrective actions prior to this FY2024 audit for the following reasons: the FY2021 State auditor & Inspector (SAI) audit was released four days prior to the beginning of FY2024, the FY2022 SAI audit was released near the end of FY2025, and the FY2023 audit was released in FY2026; therefore, OMES could not take corrective action prior to the FY2024 audit began. At the beginning of FY2025, OMES began corrective measures as noted in SAI’s Condition and Context in this finding. • OMES acknowledges OMES subrecipient monitoring process lacked the strength and consistency to ensure subrecipients established and maintained effective internal control. However, OMES has taken steps to correct these findings and follow the recommendations set forth by SAI as noted in SAI’s Condition and Context in this finding. Beginning with FY2025, OMES has taken the following measures:  Oversight and management of the ERA program has been transferred to the OMES Grant Management Office (OMES-GMO) which has staff with several years of grant experience. OMES-GMO has recently hired additional staff, and the two staff members dedicated to the management of the ERA program have 20+ years of combined federal grant specific experience.  OMES ensured that the subrecipient agreement included all the required terms under the ERA Program and that the agreement does not expire, OMES-GMO and the Communities of Foundation of Oklahoma (CFO) executed an updated Subrecipient Grant Agreement Amendment that details the responsibilities of OMES to monitor CFO and the duties and processes that CFO must follow in regard to ERA Program, including detailed cash management policies.  OMES-GMO required the return of the remaining ERA2 Program funds from CFO to ensure proper oversight and review of ERA expenditures is performed.  OMES-GMO has in place a multi-level system of internal controls for grant management and oversight that includes routine monitoring, desk review, and site visits for all projects and associated project/administrative expenditures to ensure allowability, accuracy, and assist in the detection of fraud. For example, OMES-GMO’s process for disbursing funds to a subrecipient requires a written request from the subrecipient with supporting documentation, then OMES-GMO assigns a staff lead and secondary grant analyst to perform a primary and secondary review for compliance and to require additional supporting documentation if needed to approve the request. Once those reviews are completed and approved by the OMES-GMO staff, the Director of the OMES-GMO must approve the request before it is sent to the OMES Finance Division, who will then verify the calculated amount(s) before completing the disbursement to the subrecipient. These internal controls and policies have been implemented for the management and oversight of the ERA Program and provide a multilayer review that will prevent fraud and risk factors applicable to the ERA program. Additionally, the OMES-GMO staff assigned to the ERA program have the training and knowledge to ensure compliance with the Federal grant requirements.  Depending on the level of risk, OMES-GMO conducts monthly, bi-weekly or weekly meetings with each subrecipient to monitor the progress of projects and address any issues or changes that might impact the project. For the ERA Program, OMESGMO conducted bi-weekly monitoring meetings with CFO and reviewed documentation provided by CFO to ensure all ERA projects were eligible under the ERA guidelines and that CFO exercised the proper oversight over their subrecipients and spending. Anticipated Completion Date Completed Responsible Contact Person Brandy Manek
Finding Number 2024-094 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 97.036 – Disaster Grants – Public Assistance Planned Corrective Action To address this finding, OEM will strengthen its review procedures for the SEFA by implementing a documented review process to verify the ac...
Finding Number 2024-094 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 97.036 – Disaster Grants – Public Assistance Planned Corrective Action To address this finding, OEM will strengthen its review procedures for the SEFA by implementing a documented review process to verify the accuracy and completeness of information provided by ABS. OEM will coordinate with ABS to obtain and retain sufficient supporting documentation for amounts reported on the SEFA and will work with ABS to resolve any discrepancies identified during the review process. In addition, OEM will ensure staff responsible for reviewing the SEFA receive additional guidance and training on SEFA reporting requirements. These actions are intended to improve the accuracy and reliability of future SEFA reporting and strengthen compliance with applicable federal requirements. Anticipated Completion Date SFY26 Reporting Period Responsible Contact Person Brianna Thomas
Finding Number 2024-084 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.778 Medicaid Cluster Planned Corrective Action OKDHS agrees with the finding and recommendation. The agency recognizes that the volume of GI DX discrepancy messages, combined with limited automated triage cap...
Finding Number 2024-084 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.778 Medicaid Cluster Planned Corrective Action OKDHS agrees with the finding and recommendation. The agency recognizes that the volume of GI DX discrepancy messages, combined with limited automated triage capabilities, contributed to delays in resolving exceptions within the required 45-calendar-day timeframe. As noted by the auditors, the existing process relied heavily on manual review and did not provide sufficient management oversight tools to effectively monitor aging discrepancies and ensure timely resolution. Corrective Action Planned: OKDHS has initiated a multi-faceted corrective action plan designed to improve the timeliness, consistency, and accountability of GI DX exception resolution. As part of this effort, OKDHS is developing an automated prescreening process for National New Hire (NNH), State New Hire (SNH), and Oklahoma Wage (OWG) discrepancy messages. The automated process is intended to evaluate discrepancies against established policy criteria and reduce the number of non-actionable matches requiring manual review. Discrepancies identified as requiring staff review will be routed to eligibility staff with standardized documentation and processing guida nee. Additionally, OKDHS is developing formal procedures governing the review, monitoring, and resolution of GIDX discrepancies. These procedures will def me staff responsibilities, supervisory oversight expectations, escalation requirements, and management use of exception monitoring reports to support timely resolution of discrepancies. Management reporting and monitoring controls are also being enhanced to improve visibility into outstanding discrepancies and aging trends. Supervisors and program management will utilize exception reporting to monitor workloads, identify training opportunities, and promote accountability for timely processing. OKDHS will also provide training and implementation guidance to staff and supervisors regarding revised workflows, discrepancy resolution requirements, documentation standards, and management monitoring expectations. The agency anticipates implementation of the planned enhancements beginning in October 2026, with continued monitoring and refinement following deployment to ensure the corrective actions effectively address the underlying control deficiencies identified in the finding. OHCA MEMBER AUDIT Auditor Response: Member Audit began receiving Medicaid files monthly in September of 2023. Files are continuing to be received from DHS each month. Audits are completed monthly and will continue indefinitely. Any discrepancies are discussed with OKDHS to determine the cause and remedy put in place to ensure any failed jobs were resolved. Anticipated Completion Date October 2026 Responsible Contact Person OKDHS Contact: Kayla Urtz, Director of Internal Audit OHCA Contact: Tana Parrott, Director of Member Audits
Finding Number 2024-084 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.778 - Medicaid Planned Corrective Action OKDHS agrees with the finding and recommendation. The agency recognizes that the volume of GI DX discrepancy messages, combined with limited automated triage capabilit...
Finding Number 2024-084 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.778 - Medicaid Planned Corrective Action OKDHS agrees with the finding and recommendation. The agency recognizes that the volume of GI DX discrepancy messages, combined with limited automated triage capabilities, contributed to delays in resolving exceptions within the required 45-calendar-day timeframe. As noted by the auditors, the existing process relied heavily on manual review and did not provide sufficient management oversight tools to effectively monitor aging discrepancies and ensure timely resolution. OKDHS has initiated a muti-faceted corrective action plan designed to improve the timeliness, consistency, and accountability of G1DX exception resolution. As part of this effort, OKDHS is developing an automated pre-screening process for National New Hire (NNH), State New Hire (SNH), and Oklahoma Wage (OWG) discrepancy messages. The automated process is intended to evaluate discrepancies against established policy criteria and reduce the number of non-actionable matches requiring manual review. Discrepancies identified as requiring staff review will be routed to eligibility staff with standardized documentation and processing guidance. Additionally, OKDHS is developing formal procedures governing the review, monitoring, and resolution of GIDX discrepancies. These procedures will define staff responsibilities, supervisory oversight expectations, escalation requirements, and management use of exception monitoring reports to support the timely resolution of discrepancies. Management reporting and monitoring controls are also being enhanced to improve visibility into outstanding discrepancies and aging trends. Supervisors and program management will utilize exception reporting to monitor workloads, identify training opportunities, and promote accountability for timely processing. OKDHS will also provide training and implementation guidance to staff and supervisors regarding revised workflows, discrepancy resolution requirements, documentation standards, and management monitoring expectations. The agency anticipates implementation of the planned enhancements beginning in October 2026, with continued monitoring and refinement following deployment to ensure the corrective actions effectively address the underlying control deficiencies identified in the finding. Anticipated Completion Date 10/5/26 and OHCA will continue monitoring through SFY2025 Responsible Contact Person Kayla Urtz and Tana Parrott, OHCA
Finding Number 2024-042 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.778 Medicaid Cluster Planned Corrective Action Management acknowledges the variances identified in the Medicaid, CHIP (COVID), and CHIP 64.21 federal expenditure amounts reported in GAAP Package Z. Upon revie...
Finding Number 2024-042 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.778 Medicaid Cluster Planned Corrective Action Management acknowledges the variances identified in the Medicaid, CHIP (COVID), and CHIP 64.21 federal expenditure amounts reported in GAAP Package Z. Upon review, the discrepancies were determined to result from formula reference errors, missed carry-forward updates, and omitted adjustments within internal reporting worksheets. These issues were limited to the preparation of the financial schedules and did not affect underlying program expenditures, eligibility determinations, or federal claiming. Management has corrected all affected worksheets, updated the formula references, and ensured that all required adjustments— including administrative expenditures, Soon-to-be-Sooners updates, and 64.21 Line 4 collections—are accurately reflected in the revised totals. All impacted quarters have been updated accordingly. To strengthen controls and prevent recurrence, management has implemented a formal quarter-end reconciliation checklist, enhanced review procedures, and instituted secondary reviewer sign-off for all federal expenditure schedules. Worksheet dependencies and adjustment requirements are being developed in a federal reporting procedures manual that should be complete in October 2026. With the team now fully staffed, management is able to reinforce these procedures and improve the consistency and quality of the review and approval process. Management believes these corrective actions fully address the causes of the variances and will support accurate, complete, and reliable reporting in future periods. Anticipated Completion Date December 31, 2026 Responsible Contact Person Calvin Cole, OHCA Director Financial Accountability & Compliance, Susan Crooke, OHCA Senior Director Accountability & Compliance
Finding Number 2024-071 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.667 – SSBG Planned Corrective Action OKDHS agrees with the finding and recommendation. OKDHS will strengthen its internal controls by implementing a review and reconciliation process to ensure that grant draw...
Finding Number 2024-071 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.667 – SSBG Planned Corrective Action OKDHS agrees with the finding and recommendation. OKDHS will strengthen its internal controls by implementing a review and reconciliation process to ensure that grant draw amounts requested through the Payment Management System (PMS) agree with supporting documentation prior to submission. Additionally, OKDHS will verify that expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) are accurately reconciled to supporting accounting records before the SEFA is finalized and submitted. These procedures are intended to improve the accuracy and completeness of federal financial reporting and reduce the risk of reporting discrepancies. Anticipated Completion Date N/A Responsible Contact Person Kevin Haddock & Amber Kelley
Finding Number 2024-078 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.658 – Foster Care Planned Corrective Action OKDHS concurs that documentation supporting the preparation, review, and reconciliation of the CB-496 report should be strengthened. OKDHS has previously directed t...
Finding Number 2024-078 Subject Heading (Financial) or AL no. and program name (Federal) 93.658 – Foster Care Planned Corrective Action OKDHS concurs that documentation supporting the preparation, review, and reconciliation of the CB-496 report should be strengthened. OKDHS has previously directed the CARE team to improve documentation of adjustments and corrections made during the financial reporting process so that changes are clearly supported and can be independently reviewed. OKDHS is currently working through its broader financial reporting and reconciliation processes to improve consistency in the preparation, documentation, review, and retention of supporting records. This work includes strengthening the documentation of adjustments and corrections and ensuring that differences between financial reports and underlying accounting or cost allocation records are clearly identified, explained, and supported. OKDHS will continue developing and implementing standardized procedures for the preparation and review of federal financial reports. The updated process will include clearer documentation requirements for adjustments and corrections, reconciliation of reported amounts to supporting financial records, and evidence of independent review prior to submission. Anticipated Completion Date 9/30/2026 Responsible Contact Person Kayla Urtz
« 1 117 118 120 121 829 »