Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,701
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
674 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Responsible: Thomas Hoover, CFO Corrective Actions: 1) Update Finance policies to document and maintain the documentation of Supervisory review and approval of journal entries charging payroll costs to federal grants; 2) Update Finance policies to review estimates of accrued costs charged to feder...
Responsible: Thomas Hoover, CFO Corrective Actions: 1) Update Finance policies to document and maintain the documentation of Supervisory review and approval of journal entries charging payroll costs to federal grants; 2) Update Finance policies to review estimates of accrued costs charged to federal grants at calendar/fiscal year end to determine whether true-ups to actual costs are necessary. Completion Date: March 29, 2023 Explanation: 1) Review of allocated payroll costs: Payroll processing and recording of costs charged to federal grants has in practice, consistently involved multiple review and approval steps by at least two employees. Detailed records of these steps are maintained in Finance records for each payroll, including the allocated grant costs. However, Management acknowledges that an additional step be added to capture the documentation of review and approval of the payroll journal entries that allocate payroll costs to federal grants. This step was put in place in 2023 to resolve a recommendation from OJJDP/OCFO. Supervisor review and approval is captured directly in the general ledger system. Finance policies have been updated to codify this additional step as recommended. 2) Procedure for trueing up estimates: Three of sixty transactions tested showed that payroll costs were accrued at year end based on the approved grant budget but were not trued up in the new accounting period based on actual costs. The total variance of the three transactions was $6.20. Finance policies have been updated to include evaluating year-end accruals to determine whether a true-up is necessary in the new period as recommended.
Responsible: Sally Erny, Deputy CEO Corrective Action: Document and maintain documentation of Supervisory review and approval of grant reports. Completion Date: July 10, 2024 Explanation: Since the inception of National CASA/GAL receiving federal funding, procedures and practices were in place f...
Responsible: Sally Erny, Deputy CEO Corrective Action: Document and maintain documentation of Supervisory review and approval of grant reports. Completion Date: July 10, 2024 Explanation: Since the inception of National CASA/GAL receiving federal funding, procedures and practices were in place for the review and approval of performance reports and SF-425s (FFRs). This practice includes the involvement of multiple staff in the organization participating in the development and review of these documents and a knowledgeable staff member with appropriate authority approving the document. There are many points of approval through the development of the reports. In terms of the FFRs, the Accounting Director is responsible for preparing a Pivot table showing the expenses for the grant for both the quarterly and inception to date periods and to update the data worksheet for the quarterly FFR report. The Controller confirms that the cumulative expenses indicated on the quarterly FFR report data worksheet match the inception to date information in the accounting ledger and then approves the report. The Accounting Director submits the FFR report through the Grants Management System. In 2023 a policy, as part of the Operations SOPs, was put in place that in addition to the various staff who work on developing the performance report, OJJDP performance reporting would be reviewed and approved and documented as such, by the Project Manager and appropriate Chief Officer. This policy formalized what had been happening in practice over many years. While we acknowledge that this policy of documentation was not in place in 2022, the practice of review and approval was. In 2023 and going forward, we have improved documenting the approval processes for the FFRs and performance reports.
Finding 481007 (2022-004)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Finding 2022-004 Finding Summary: In our testing of reporting, we did not have a documented control in place to review reports prior to submission for reporting directly to Department of Treasury. Responsible Individuals: Douglas Heinrich, Finance Officer Corrective Action Plan: We will adopt contro...
Finding 2022-004 Finding Summary: In our testing of reporting, we did not have a documented control in place to review reports prior to submission for reporting directly to Department of Treasury. Responsible Individuals: Douglas Heinrich, Finance Officer Corrective Action Plan: We will adopt controls to have a review process added before the required reports for federal programs are submitted to federal or state agencies. Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2024
Planned Corrective Action: The Town will adopt policies pertaining to federal awards, specifically ARPA, that have been effective and useful in other municipalities. Using established policies from other municipalities will expedite bringing Southampton into compliance. The new policies will esta...
Planned Corrective Action: The Town will adopt policies pertaining to federal awards, specifically ARPA, that have been effective and useful in other municipalities. Using established policies from other municipalities will expedite bringing Southampton into compliance. The new policies will establish controls setting responsibilities and deadlines for timely and accurate submissions. With ARPA funding moving towards an expiration date, these policies will be important to finalize and close-out any awards.
Finding 2022-02: The Project has not received any PRAC receipts in 2022 and 2021 or subsequent to the year end. Recommendation: Management needs to work with HUD to process monthly PRAC submission receipts. Action Taken: Management is working with Darletta Baugh, HUD’s project manager regarding...
Finding 2022-02: The Project has not received any PRAC receipts in 2022 and 2021 or subsequent to the year end. Recommendation: Management needs to work with HUD to process monthly PRAC submission receipts. Action Taken: Management is working with Darletta Baugh, HUD’s project manager regarding the non-receipt of the PRAC monthly submission. In addition, Management has delegated the oversight of the PRAC process.
Finding No. 2022-003; Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202), CFDA 14.157 Criteria Loans are not permitted to be made from project cash without prior authorization from HUD. Condition During the year ended November 30, 2022, the project paid expenses in the amount of $326,282 on behalf of ...
Finding No. 2022-003; Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202), CFDA 14.157 Criteria Loans are not permitted to be made from project cash without prior authorization from HUD. Condition During the year ended November 30, 2022, the project paid expenses in the amount of $326,282 on behalf of other affiliates from project cash without HUD approval. The amount due to the project as of November 30, 2022 is $326,282. Cause Procedures were not in place to ensure that cash disbursements of project funds were limited to project operating costs. Effect or Potential Effect The payments of $326,282 were unauthorized loans and therefore considered to be questioned costs. Questioned Costs $326,282 Recommendation Management should immediately reimburse the amount due to the project and establish procedures to ensure payments of this nature are not made in the future. Auditor Noncompliance Code: B – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Because the PRAC renewals were so delayed, therefore there was no money available to pay back the project. Furthermore, the insurance costs are tremendous and had to be financed. In order to ensure the payments are applied and paid timely it is best to have the entire amount pulled from one bank account. If each entity were to pay its share it would cause confusion and may result in possible cancellation. Upon finalizing the audits and submitting to HUD, management intends to request funds from the replacement reserve to enable them to pay down the due from affiliates.
View Audit 316973 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2022-002; Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202), CFDA 14.157 Criteria The regulatory agreement required that the project make monthly deposits to its replacement reserve. Condition During the year ended November 30, 2022, the project did not make the required monthly deposits ...
Finding No. 2022-002; Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202), CFDA 14.157 Criteria The regulatory agreement required that the project make monthly deposits to its replacement reserve. Condition During the year ended November 30, 2022, the project did not make the required monthly deposits to the replacement reserve as disclosed. The project was required to make monthly deposits to the reserve in the amount of $5,000 and $9,160 related to Finding 2021-1. Total cumulative deposits due to the replacement reserve during the year ended November 30, 2022 were $69,160 of which the project made deposits of $54,569 leaving an amount remaining due to the reserve of $14,431. Cause Due to COVID-19, the Property experienced delays in receiving its annual PRAC renewal and monthly PRAC subsidy funding. Effect or Potential Effect Underfunding of the replacement reserve and a noncompliance of the regulatory agreement. Questioned Costs: $14,431 Recommendation Management should make timely deposits to ensure that the replacement reserve is funded in accordance with the terms of the regulatory agreement. Auditor Noncompliance Code: N – Special Tests and Provisions Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Due to COVID-19, delays were encountered by HUD while reviewing and renewing the annual PRAC which did not afford management enough time to settle outstanding vendor payments and make the increased reserve for replacement deposit.
View Audit 316973 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2022-002 Unauthorized loans from project assets Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation Statement of Condition During the year ended September 30, 2022, the project paid expenses in the amount of $81,886 on behalf of an affiliate from project cash without HUD approval. The amount due...
Finding 2022-002 Unauthorized loans from project assets Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation Statement of Condition During the year ended September 30, 2022, the project paid expenses in the amount of $81,886 on behalf of an affiliate from project cash without HUD approval. The amount due to the project as of September 30, 2022 is $81,886. Criteria Loans are not permitted to be made from project cash without prior authorization from HUD. Cause Procedures were not in place to ensure that cash disbursements of project funds were limited to project operating costs. Effect or Potential Effect The payments of $81,886 were unauthorized loans and therefore considered to be questioned costs. Questioned Costs $ 81,886. Recommendation Management should immediately reimburse the amount due to the project and establish procedures to ensure payments of this nature are not made in the future. Auditor Noncompliance Code B – Allowable Cost/Costs Principles Reporting Views of Responsible Officials The Corporation agrees with the finding and the auditor's recommendations have been adopted. Upon finalizing the audits and submitting to HUD, management intends to request funds from the replacement reserve to enable them to pay down the due from affiliates..
View Audit 316972 Questioned Costs: $1
2- Finding No. 2022-002; Unauthorized loans from project assets Statement of Condition During the year ended September 30, 2022, the project paid expenses in the amount of $32,736 on behalf of an affiliate from project cash without HUD approval. The amount due to the project as of September 30, 2022...
2- Finding No. 2022-002; Unauthorized loans from project assets Statement of Condition During the year ended September 30, 2022, the project paid expenses in the amount of $32,736 on behalf of an affiliate from project cash without HUD approval. The amount due to the project as of September 30, 2022 is $32,736. Criteria Loans are not permitted to be made from project cash without prior authorization from HUD. Cause Procedures were not in place to ensure that cash disbursements of project funds were limited to approved project operating costs. Effect or Potential Effect The payments of $32,736 were unauthorized loans and therefore considered to be questioned costs. Questioned Costs $32,736. Recommendation Management should immediately reimburse the amount due to the project and establish procedures to ensure payments of this nature are not made in the future. Auditor Noncompliance Code B – Allowable Cost/Costs Principles Reporting Views of Responsible Officials The Corporation agrees with the finding and the auditor's recommendations have been adopted. Upon finalizing the audits and submitting to HUD, management intends to request funds from the replacement reserve to enable them to pay down the due from affiliates.
View Audit 316971 Questioned Costs: $1
The Houston Housing Authority agrees with this finding. The Houston Housing Authority has for the past several months undertaken a program to review all voucher files for purposes of getting all delinquent recertifications completed. During this process if other required documents are found to be...
The Houston Housing Authority agrees with this finding. The Houston Housing Authority has for the past several months undertaken a program to review all voucher files for purposes of getting all delinquent recertifications completed. During this process if other required documents are found to be missing steps are being taken to complete the missing documentation and make sure that the files are complete. This review is substantially completed with final completion expected in the third quarter of 2024. Procedures have been implemented with regards to preventing this situation from recurring. Where needed staff will be provided the necessary training to make sure that a HCVP staff have the skills needed to successfully complete their job tasks. To facilitate this training, the Houston Housing Authority has created a training center that is made available to not only Houston Housing Authority staff but also others to provide a wide variety of training classes. Current leadership at the Houston Housing Authority is committed to having a competent trained staff working in the HCVP as well as other departments with the agency. This work is handled by the Voucher Program Operations department. The VP of this department and the Director of this department are primarily responsible for making sure the necessary corrections are made and the fill review is completed within the third quarter of 2024.
Condition: The Organization’s controls in place for reporting submissions did not identify that the General and Targeted Distribution Post-Payment Notice of Reporting Requirements guidelines were not followed related to expense amounts reported in the Organization’s period 2 portal submissions. P...
Condition: The Organization’s controls in place for reporting submissions did not identify that the General and Targeted Distribution Post-Payment Notice of Reporting Requirements guidelines were not followed related to expense amounts reported in the Organization’s period 2 portal submissions. Planned Corrective Action: The Organization will review its processes surrounding the quantification of expenses reported and will implement additional levels of review to ensure that the expense amounts are validated for future reporting periods. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Tom Garvey, Interim CFO Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2023
View Audit 316928 Questioned Costs: $1
Condition: The Organization’s lacked effective controls to ensure documentation for expenses reported within the Organization’s period 2 portal submission were retained. The Organization was able to produce documentation for total expenses of $7,516,920, while the Organization had reporting to HRSA ...
Condition: The Organization’s lacked effective controls to ensure documentation for expenses reported within the Organization’s period 2 portal submission were retained. The Organization was able to produce documentation for total expenses of $7,516,920, while the Organization had reporting to HRSA that it had incurred $8,509,978 of expenses. As a result, the Organization was unable to provide support for $993,058 of the total expenses reported. Planned Corrective Action: The Organization will review its processes surrounding the retention of documentation used to report expenses and will implement additional levels of review to ensure that the proper documentation is retained for future reporting period portal submissions. Contact person responsible for corrective action: Tom Garvey, Interim CFO Anticipated Completion Date: 9/30/2023
View Audit 316928 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 480689 (2022-004)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Finding 2022-004 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Relat...
Finding 2022-004 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: The Period of Availability for the SPED PL 94-142 Grant was September 29, 2021 through September 30, 2023. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance it was noted that there are expenditures charged to the SPED PL 94-142 Grant (September 29, 2021 through September 30, 2023) for services outside of the period of performance as set forth by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Context: During our test of expenditures and review of the general ledger against the SPED PL 94-142 Grant as it is related to compliance it was noted that the first payroll charged to the grant were for services prior to the grant start date of September 29, 2021 and thus would be outside the period of performance and thus would not be allowable costs. Effect: The School Department was not in compliance with the period of performance requirement as set forth by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs for the first payroll charged to the grant whose service period was prior to the grant start date of September 29, 2021 was $7,249.98. Cause: Staffing turnover in the financial department lead to weakened standard procedures/protocols by inexperienced (temporary) staffing. Recommendation: We recommend the School Department follow procedures to ensure that expenditures charged to the grant are within the period of performance as set forth by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Managements Response: Management agrees with the auditors’ findings and will put in procedures and policies to correct the action going forward. Responsible for Corrective Plan: Patrick McIntyre, School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2023 Action Taken: The School Department ensures that expenditures charged to the grant only once approved and within the period of performance as set forth by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). Accounting codes are not set up for individual grants until final approval from DESE.
View Audit 316915 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 480688 (2022-003)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Finding 2022-003 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Relate...
Finding 2022-003 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria: Where employees work solely or partially on a single Federal program or cost objective, their salaries or wages must be supported by periodic certification that the employee worked on these programs for the period covered by the programs. The certifications should be prepared at least semi-annually, and should be signed by the employee or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with time and effort certifications the school department was not able to provide evidence that required certifications of time and effort for those employees whose time was spent either completely or partially spent on these programs were performed as required by Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: During our test of payroll transactions of the SPED PL 94-142 grants it was noted that the time and effort certifications were not completed for the employees tested. Effect: The School Department was not in compliance with the time and effort certification requirements. Cause: Staffing turnover in the financial department lead to weakened standard procedures/protocols by inexperienced (temporary) staffing. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the School Department follow procedures to ensure that semi-annual certifications and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by either the employees and/or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees in a timely manner in order to comply with the time and effort certification requirement. Management Response: Management agrees with the auditors’ findings and will put in procedures and policies to correct the action going forward. Responsible for Corrective Plan: Patrick McIntyre, School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: As required, the School Department ensures that semi-annual certifications and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by either the employees and/or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees in a timely manner in order to comply with the time and effort certification requirement. Certifications are filed in grant folders and employee personnel files.
Finding 480686 (2022-001)
Significant Deficiency 2022
Finding 2022-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Relat...
Finding 2022-001 – Special Education Cluster – AL No.’s 84.027 & 84.173 Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: Grantees must provide reasonable assurance that federal awards are expended only for allowable activities and that the costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and in accordance with the applicable cost principles. Management of the Town is also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with federal requirements that have a direct and material effect on a federal program. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. Condition and Context: Control deficiencies related to disbursements were noted as a result of the testing of internal controls over payroll. Specifically, a sample of payroll disbursements charged to the programs were tested in order to determine if adequate internal controls were in place. As a result of the testing of payroll disbursements charged to the programs, all of the employees tested were found to not have adequately approved employee payroll rate agreements. Cause: Weaknesses in the design and operation of controls. Effect or Potential Effect: Due to the weaknesses in internal controls noted above, there is a risk of inappropriate salaries and wages being paid. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Yes, finding number 2021-001 Questioned Costs: Questioned costs are reported equal to $256,796.58, calculated as payroll charged to the programs. Recommendation: The Town should improve internal controls over Activities Allowed/Allowable Costs by ensuring employee’s payroll rate agreements are approved by an appropriate level of management and in a timely manner. Managements Response: Though we believe that Finding 2022-001occured due to staff turnover at the time of the rate agreement approval, the Town and the Schools will assure federal awards are expended only for allowable activities. Consistent with State and Federal requirements and as in Acushnet’s updated Federal Grant Procedures Manual (February 2023), the Town will maintain source documentation (invoices, time sheets, payroll stubs, etc.) – including approved payroll rate agreements – that support federal expenditures. Responsible for Corrective Plan: Patrick McIntyre, School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2023 Action Taken: All employee’s payroll rate agreements are approved by an appropriate level of management and in a timely manner.
View Audit 316915 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 2022-001 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: Where employees work solely or partially on a single Federal program or cost objective, their salaries ...
Finding 2022-001 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Programs Criteria: Where employees work solely or partially on a single Federal program or cost objective, their salaries or wages must be supported by periodic certification that the employee worked on these programs for the period covered by the programs. The certifications should be prepared at least semi-annually, and should be signed by the employee or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with time and effort certifications the Town was not able to provide evidence that the required certifications of time and effort for employees whose time was spent either completely or partially spent on these programs was performed as required by Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: During our test of payroll transactions of the Education Stabilization Fund grants it was noted that the time and effort certification for a sample of employees tested was not completed. Effect: The Town was not in compliance with the time and effort certification requirements. Cause: Clerical error. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Town of West Bridgewater follow procedures to ensure that semi-annual certifications and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by either the employees and/or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees in a timely manner in order to comply with the time and effort certification requirement. Responsible for Corrective Plan: Superintendent Estimated Completion Date: Complete for subsequent fiscal years. Action Taken: Reviewed and followed required procedures for subsequent fiscal years.
Corrective action plan over control environment over lost revenue COVID – 19 – Provider Relief Funding (Assistance Listing #93.498) Recommendation: The Authority’s procedures for calculating lost revenues for the purposes of PRF reporting should be designed to ensure that audited year end numbers ar...
Corrective action plan over control environment over lost revenue COVID – 19 – Provider Relief Funding (Assistance Listing #93.498) Recommendation: The Authority’s procedures for calculating lost revenues for the purposes of PRF reporting should be designed to ensure that audited year end numbers are reported and/or tied back to amounts that are reported. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: As of July 2024, there is no further lost revenue reporting that is required to be reported. Management will implement more robust internal controls in preparation for similar future grant reporting. For lost revenues that have been submitted for PRF that do not tie back to an audited financial statement, a reconciliation will be completed and documented. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Min Cummings, VP of Finance and Accounting, 703-629-8155 Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 31, 2024 and going forward.
Timely Preparation of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) COVID – 19 – Provider Relief Funding (Assistance Listing #93.498) Recommendation: The Authority’s policy and procedure should be designed to ensure timely reporting as required by the Uniform Guidance. Explanation of disagreeme...
Timely Preparation of Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) COVID – 19 – Provider Relief Funding (Assistance Listing #93.498) Recommendation: The Authority’s policy and procedure should be designed to ensure timely reporting as required by the Uniform Guidance. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned/taken in response to finding: Management will enhance its procedures around the preparation of the SEFA to include a timely year-end reconciliation between the general ledger and all source documentation to ensure that all Federal expenditures are complete and accurately reported in the SEFA in fiscal 2024. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Min Cummings, VP of Finance and Accounting, 703-629-8155 Planned completion date for corrective action plan: For the creation of the Schedule for FY2023.
2022-006 – Allowable Costs Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Immunization Cooperation Agreements Assistance Listing Number: 93.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FY 21/22 and 22/23 Pass-Through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Health...
2022-006 – Allowable Costs Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Immunization Cooperation Agreements Assistance Listing Number: 93.268 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FY 21/22 and 22/23 Pass-Through Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Health Pass-Through Number(s): None Award Period: 1/1/2022 – 12/31/22 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Material Noncompliance (Modified Opinion) Condition and Context: While testing allowable costs relating to payroll expenditures, sixteen out of forty transactions were identified that could not be appropriately re-calculated per the amount that was charged to the grant. The County was not able to provide support for payroll expenditure amounts charged to the grant for part-time hourly employees. Recommendation: We recommend management should review the process of timekeeping for grant eligible employees for daily time input, as well as grant authorized wages. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Grant Accountant met with department staff to review the time tracking process for grant-eligible employees to ensure that all payroll expenditures charged to the grant are eligible, authorized, and charged on an individual employee basis. Project codes in Infor allow salary distribution and personnel information to be assigned to each grant. Where possible, this function is to assist in supporting the amounts charged to the grant program. The department will maintain documentation to support the amounts and allowability of the charges applied to the grant for payroll. The County is evaluating new time tracking systems to be implemented in 2025 that will allow for time tracking and reporting at a grant/program level. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Thomas Landauer and Dean Dortone Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 2025
View Audit 316613 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 480352 (2022-005)
Significant Deficiency 2022
2022-005 – Completion and Submission of the Annual Single Audit Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Various Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.023, 21.027, 93.268, 93.323, 93.575, 93.596, 93.778 Federal Award Identificati...
2022-005 – Completion and Submission of the Annual Single Audit Federal Agency: U.S. Department of the Treasury and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Various Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.023, 21.027, 93.268, 93.323, 93.575, 93.596, 93.778 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: Various Pass-Through Agency: Various Pass-Through Number(s): Various Award Period: 1/1/2022 – 12/31/22 Type of Finding: Other Matters and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Condition and Context: The County’s single audit and reporting package was delayed for the year ended December 31, 2022, beyond the due date. Recommendation: The County should evaluate its procedures around timely submission of the single audit. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Corrective Action: The reason for the finding recurrence is in part a result of the timing of when the finding was issued. For example, the 2021 Single Audit was issued in December 2023. At this point, the 2022 fiscal year was already complete. Additionally, the implementation of corrective actions are in progress, including providing training, oversight and guidance to departments administering the grants, but these efforts take time to complete and or are ongoing. The County is implementing best practices in grant administration to ensure the timely submission of the Single Audit. A Deputy Controller, Grant Accounting was hired in February 2023. This position provides oversight, training, communications and regular review of grant receivables and expenditures, along with their inclusion in the General Ledger. Additionally, continued use of Infor’s grant management system and Project codes are increasing efficiency in accurately completing the SEFA and providing documentation as requested for programs being audited. The County began implementing a grant accounting system as part of our implementation of Infor in mid-2021 and are continuing to work with departments to refine their use of the system. The County has prioritized completion of the 2022 Single Audit and has allocated staff time from the Controller’s department and other departments to complete the audit. Throughout the process, the Grant Accountant and Controller staff have facilitated communication and information between grant-funded departments and CLA. These changes in part contribute to the completion of the 2022 Single Audit in less than half the time required to complete the 2021 Single Audit. Depending on external auditor availability and other Financial Audits being conducted, the 2023 SEFA will be complete and ready for review by November 2024, with a goal of completion of the 2023 Single Audit by early 2024. We anticipate a timely submission of the 2024 Single Audit by the due date of September 30, 2025. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Thomas Landauer and Fonta Reilly Planned completion date for corrective action plan: September 2025
Finding #SA2022-006 Compliance with Grant Documentation Requirements Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Assistance Listing Title: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass Through Entity: California State Water Resources Con...
Finding #SA2022-006 Compliance with Grant Documentation Requirements Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Assistance Listing Title: COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Name of Federal Agency: Department of Treasury Pass Through Entity: California State Water Resources Control Board Federal Award Identification Number: 68-0281986 • Name(s) of the contact person: Shay Narayan, Director of Finance; Carmen Gusman, Deputy Director of Finance • Corrective Action Plan: The City will develop procedures to ensure all documentation is provided • Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/24
View Audit 316559 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding #SA2022-008: Accurate Review and Payment of Vendor Reimbursement Requests Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Assistance Listing Title: COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity...
Finding #SA2022-008: Accurate Review and Payment of Vendor Reimbursement Requests Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Assistance Listing Title: COVID-19 - Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants Name of Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass Through Entity: San Joaquin County Community Development Department Federal Award Identification Number: A-93-916 • Name(s) of the contact person: Shay Narayan, Director of Finance; Carmen Gusman, Deputy Director of Finance • Corrective Action Plan: The City will develop procedures to ensure accurate review and payment of vendor reimbursement requests, including providing training to administrative staff as necessary. • Anticipated Completion Date: 06/30/24
View Audit 316559 Questioned Costs: $1
Transitions in WCSC financial personnel during and after year-end resulted delays to the audit process for the audit period ending September 30, 2022. To address this problem, WCSC hired a fiscal consultant in August 2022 to oversee the fiscal office, prepare and complete all grant reports, and to c...
Transitions in WCSC financial personnel during and after year-end resulted delays to the audit process for the audit period ending September 30, 2022. To address this problem, WCSC hired a fiscal consultant in August 2022 to oversee the fiscal office, prepare and complete all grant reports, and to coordinate all fiscal audits. WCSC also hired a full-time bookkeeper in October 2022 to conduct day-to-day financial transactions and to assist with audit and grant reporting. WCSC has already engaged its Auditors to conduct the FY2023 audit, which will commence immediately following the completion of the FY2022 audit. Estimated Completion Date : October 31, 2024
TINDLEY ACTION PLAN 1. Develop and implement Procurement Policy (completed and on-going by CFO/Accounting Manager/Accountant/Grants Manager/Network President/Department Heads) a. Enhance written procedures for procurement and accounts payable. i. Purchases between $15,000-$25,000 will require two qu...
TINDLEY ACTION PLAN 1. Develop and implement Procurement Policy (completed and on-going by CFO/Accounting Manager/Accountant/Grants Manager/Network President/Department Heads) a. Enhance written procedures for procurement and accounts payable. i. Purchases between $15,000-$25,000 will require two quotes for all new vendors; purchases between $25,000-$75,000 will require three quotes for all vendors; and purchases over $75,000 will require a competitive bid process for all vendors. ii. Establish a Master Vendor list. 1. Master Vendors may be used for up to $20,000 for regular services and products in the normal course of business with dual approval by the Network President and CFO. b. Require vendor bids/quotes for services. c. Segregate purchasing duties. 2. Research new vendors prior to utilization (implemented and ongoing by CFO/Accountant) a. Are these vendors commonly known in the industry or the community? b. Does the vendor have a valid website, phone number, address and email address? 3. Conduct Periodic/Continuous Fraud-Detection Monitoring (CFO – at every fiscal year end) a. Annually identify (1) Tindley’s top 20 vendors, (2) all Tindley vendors receiving annual payments totaling more than $10,000, and (3) any new vendors receiving annual payments totaling more than $5,000. i. Ensure there are valid and updated contracts for these vendors. ii. Ensure the description for services on the corresponding. invoices are detailed and complete. iii. Assess multiple corresponding invoices that have the same total amounts. 4. Refine and codify job descriptions/job duties for Network President, CFO, Grants & Compliance Manager, and Director of Development (HR/Board to be completed by 9/30/24) a. Keep these job descriptions in a database to ensure a smooth transition in the event of a departure or retirement. b. The job descriptions should highlight the financial compliance aspects of each position. 5. Change reporting structure for CFO (to be implemented by HR/Board 9/30/24) a. CFO will report directly to the Board with a dotted line to the Network President. 6. Provide anti-fraud training for Network President, CFO, Director of Development, Grants & Compliance Manager, and in-house accounting professionals (to be implemented by Network President/CFO and completed by 11/30/24) 7. Establish a Whistleblower/Ethics hotline to report suspected fraud (to be implemented by HR 9/30/24) a. Ensure employees understand that it is available to report suspected fraud. b. Develop procedures for responding to whistleblower allegations. PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Tindley should adhere to strict ethical and legal standards to prevent fraud and ensure accountability. This procurement policy should be cross-referenced with current local, state, and federal laws. II. CODE OF CONDUCT A. Conflict of Interest Tindley purchasers shall not participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract if they have a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict arises when the Tindley purchaser; any immediate family member (spouse, child, parent, parent in law, sibling, or sibling in law); partner; or an organization that employs, or is about to employ, any of the above has a direct or indirect financial or other interest in, or will receive a tangible personal benefit from, a firm or individual considered for the contract award. An “organizational conflict of interest” is created because of a relationship that a Tindley employee has with a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is involved in the transaction such that the Tindley employee is or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving the related organization. B. Gifts, Money, Gratuities Tindley employees involved in the purchasing process shall not solicit or accept gifts, money, gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value, except unsolicited items or services of nominal value from vendors, prospective vendors, parties to subcontracts, or any other person or entity that receives, or may receive compensation for providing goods or performing services to Tindley. All Tindley purchasers shall review and comply with Tindley’s procedures for disclosing, reviewing, and addressing actual and potential conflicts of interest. III. PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES A. Procurement Procedure See chart at the end of document B. Bid Procedures All procurement shall be conducted in a manner that provides, to the maximum extent practical, a full and open competition. Tindley bid procedures should always follow local, state, and federal requirements. Procurement Processes should include the following: 1. Assemble a Procurement Committee consisting of the Network President, CFO, Grant Manager, and the requestor of the product or service. i. In the event that the requestor of the product or service is the Network President, a Tindley Board member of the applicable committee that corresponds to the request will be asked to participate. 2. Pre-Bid Phase. i. If an outside vendor is needed to develop the bid specifications for a bid project, the vendor, or related parties to the vendor cannot participate in the bid. ii. The procurement committee should have specific criteria of the bid specifications including how bids will be judged based on price, quality, experience of vendors, etc. iii. All solicitations shall incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for products or services to be procured. iv. Identify all requirements which offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids and proposals. v. If required by local, state, and or federal laws, Tindley should publicly announce in advance of projects that require a competitive bid process. vi. Vendors should not be allowed to interface with Tindley procurement committee members before any public bids are announced, and post-bid announcement, interactions should occur only as part of the formal bid process (questions and answers in writing, face-to-face walk-throughs, proposal phases, and actual bid submissions). 3. Bid Phase. i. All bidders should have adequate time to respond to a bid, including Q&A sessions, and a face-to-face walk-through if necessary. ii. The Tindley employee sending out bid packages including specifications, should not be the same person receiving the vendor bid submissions. iii. The Tindley employee receiving the bid submissions should time and date stamp each bid received and the committee should exclude any bids submitted after the bid deadline. iv. Tindley employees are forbidden to disclose to vendors information about other bidders, including bid proposal contents such as pricing. 4. Bid Selection Phase. i. The procurement committee should develop a bid template and checklist that ranks bids based on criteria developed by the committee and ensures bid procedures are followed. ii. If the procurement committee chooses the winning bid on criteria other than what is stated in the original specifications, the committee must document the reasons why. For example, if the winning bid was not the lowest price, the committee must justify in writing why the vendor was selected. C. Competition All procurement shall be conducted in a manner that provides, to the maximum extent practical, a full and open competition. 1. Procurements shall avoid noncompetitive practices that may restrict or eliminate competition, including but not limited to: a. Unreasonable qualification requirements. b. Unnecessary experience and excessive bonding requirements. c. Non-competitive pricing practices between firms or affiliated companies. d. Non-competitive contracts to consultants on retainer contracts e. Organizational conflicts of interest. f. Specifying “brand name” only instead of allowing “an equal to product.” 2. Procurements shall not intentionally split a single purchase into two or more separate purchases to avoid dollar thresholds that require more formal procurement methods. 3. Procurements shall include in any pre-qualified list an adequate number of current qualified vendors firms or products. 4. Procurements shall not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. 5. Procurements shall not use any geographic preferences (state local or tribal) in the evaluation of bid proposals except where expressly mandated or encouraged by applicable federal statutes. 6. The procurement team must find, when possible, bidders to compete that were not provided by the Tindley requester. 7. The procurement committee must use independent judgment and notify the Board of Directors and ethics hotline if the requester of products or services is attempting to use undue influence for the team to select specific vendors. D. Considerations Tindley purchasers should take the following actions when procuring goods and services. 1. Conduct a lease versus purchase analysis when appropriate, including for property and large equipment. 2. Consolidate or break out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase if possible. 3. Use state and local intergovernmental or inter-entity agreements, or common or shared goods and services, where appropriate. 4. Use federal excess and surplus property in lieu of purchasing new equipment and property if it is feasible and reduces project costs. 5. Use time and materials contracts only if no other contract is suitable and the contract includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at their own risk. If such a contract is negotiated and awarded, Tindley must assert a high degree of oversight to obtain reasonable assurance that the contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls. IV. PROCUREMENT METHODS A. All procurements made under this policy shall: 1. Be necessary, at a reasonable cost, documented, not prohibited by law or the applicable funding source, and made in accordance with this policy. 2. Avoid acquiring unnecessary or duplicative items. 3. Engage responsible vendors who possess the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. 4. Tindley purchasers shall consider vendor integrity, public policy compliance, past performance record, and financial and technical resources. B. Procurement Parameters For all transactions, Tindley shall follow the applicable procurement method set forth in Appendix 1 C. Exceptions to Standards Methods Solicitation of a proposal from a single source may only be used if the following apply and are documented: 1. The item is only available from single source. 2. Public exigency or emergency will not permit any delay. 3. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through expressly authorizes the sole source in response to a Tindley request. 4. After soliciting a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. V. DOCUMENTATION A. Records Tindley shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of each procurement transaction. These records must include, but are not limited to: 1. A description and supporting documentation showing the rationale for the procurement method (e.g., cost estimates). 2. Selection of contract type. 3. Written price or rate quotations (such as catalog price, online price, e-mail or written quote), if applicable. 4. Copies of advertisements, requests for proposals, bid sheets or bid proposal packets. 5. Reasons for vendor selection or rejection, including Finance Committee and Board Minutes, rejection letters, and award letters. 6. And the basis for the contract price. VI. COMPLIANCE WITH THIS POLICY Program directors and, where applicable, the purchasing committee, shall maintain oversight to ensure that contractors and vendors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of contracts or purchase orders. Violations of this policy may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. VII. VENDOR SELECTION CRITERIA For vendors that have been selected in a competitive bid or that will provide critical services to the school, Tindley should evaluate them based on cost, quality, past performance, experience, and financial stability. Before providing services or products, the selected vendor can be asked to provide references, allow for background checks, and provide documentation such as certificate of insurance, certificate standing, adherence to anti-fraud policies, and contracts with right-toaudit clauses.
View Audit 316515 Questioned Costs: $1
Responsible Individual: Ambrosia Ermenc, Business Manager Corrective Action Plan: The district will create requirement within policy and internal controls for time allocation / time logs to be utilized for every staff member salaried out of federal funds. Anticipated Completion Date: ongoing
Responsible Individual: Ambrosia Ermenc, Business Manager Corrective Action Plan: The district will create requirement within policy and internal controls for time allocation / time logs to be utilized for every staff member salaried out of federal funds. Anticipated Completion Date: ongoing
View Audit 316501 Questioned Costs: $1
« 1 672 673 675 676 953 »