Audit 316962

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$210.96M
Findings
28
Programs
12
Organization: Houston Housing Authority (TX)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-08-09

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
480817 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
480818 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
480819 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
480820 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
480821 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
480822 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
480823 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
480824 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes E
480825 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes E
480826 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes E
480827 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes E
480828 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
480829 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
480830 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
1057259 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1057260 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1057261 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1057262 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1057263 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1057264 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1057265 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
1057266 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes E
1057267 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes E
1057268 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes E
1057269 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes E
1057270 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
1057271 2022-004 Material Weakness - E
1057272 2022-004 Material Weakness - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
V7SPYNFKXHN9 Mike Rogers Auditee
7132600568 Laura Anne Pray Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Houston Housing Authority and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. In accordance with HUD regulations, HUD considers the Annual Budget Authority for the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (“HCV”), as included in the MTW program to be an expenditure for the purposes of this schedule. Therefore, the amount in this schedule is the total amount received directly from HUD and not the total expenditures paid by the Authority.
Title: NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: NOTE 3 - INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate.
Title: NOTE 4 - SUB-RECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Authority had no sub-recipients.
Title: NOTE 5 - NONCASH FEDERAL ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. The Authority did not receive any noncash Federal assistance for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Title: NOTE 6 - LOAN GUARANTEES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority did not elect to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate. At December 31, 2022, the Authority is not the guarantor of any loans outstanding.

Finding Details

022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-002 Eligibility Moving to Work Demonstration Program AL No. 14.881 Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 17,109 of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and 2,511 Low Rent Public Housing tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (a total of 36 tenants selected for testing): • Twelve files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, • Ten files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Eight files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Five files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Five files did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income, • Three files did not use the correct payment standard, • One file did not have the documentation necessary to verify utility allowance, • One file did not have necessary support to agree to Housing assistance payment (“HAP”), and • One file did not have an inspection performed during the year. Low Rent Public Housing (a total of 40 tenants selected for testing): • Twenty-seven files did not contain flat rent options forms, • Twenty-one files did not have a 214 declaration for a member of the household, • Seventeen files did not have annual recertifications performed within 12 months of the previous annual certification, • Thirteen files did not have income support necessary to verify tenant income, • Nine files did not have 9886 release of information form within 15 months of the annual recertification, • Six files did not have the annual recertification performed or documented, and • Three files had 50058 forms displaying different rent payments than those on the rent roll. Criteria: The Authority’s ACOP, Administrative Plan, 24 CFR 960.259, and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 484 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Mainstream Voucher AL #14.879 (a total of 4 tenants selected for testing): • One file did not have an annual recertification performed during the year, • One file did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Two files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, • One file did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, and • One file did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income. Emergency Housing Voucher AL #14.871 (a total of 5 tenants selected for testing): • Four files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Four files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, and • Five files did not have rent reasonableness form performed for the annual certification. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 484 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Mainstream Voucher AL #14.879 (a total of 4 tenants selected for testing): • One file did not have an annual recertification performed during the year, • One file did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Two files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, • One file did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, and • One file did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income. Emergency Housing Voucher AL #14.871 (a total of 5 tenants selected for testing): • Four files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Four files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, and • Five files did not have rent reasonableness form performed for the annual certification. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 484 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Mainstream Voucher AL #14.879 (a total of 4 tenants selected for testing): • One file did not have an annual recertification performed during the year, • One file did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Two files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, • One file did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, and • One file did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income. Emergency Housing Voucher AL #14.871 (a total of 5 tenants selected for testing): • Four files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Four files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, and • Five files did not have rent reasonableness form performed for the annual certification. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 524 of tenants, 15 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: • Fourteen files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Thirteen files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, and • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household. Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 524 of tenants, 15 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: • Fourteen files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Thirteen files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, and • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household. Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 524 of tenants, 15 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: • Fourteen files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Thirteen files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, and • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household. Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
022-001 Delayed Financial Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control Condition: During our audit of the Authority’s financial statements, numerous adjustments were needed to properly report the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Certain accounts had not been properly reconciled and corrective entries were not readily available. Significant audit adjustments were necessary for several audit areas and the audit was significantly delayed due to these adjustments. Context: We obtained the financial information from the Authority’s general ledger system. As part of our audit process, the financial information was compared to the unaudited submission sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Real Estate Assessment Center (“REAC”). While applying audit procedures, significant adjustments were identified as necessary to properly reflect the financial data in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to reflect the data schedule in accordance with HUD requirements. Criteria: In accordance with AU-C 265, when a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control is identified, which indicates that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, a material weakness should be reported. In accordance with HUD rules and regulations, the Authority is required to have policies and procedures in place to ensure the submission of their audited financial information to REAC within 9 months after the fiscal year end. Cause: The Authority was unable to maintain proper oversight of its financial closing processes and recording keeping during COVID. As a result the Authority did not have access to accurate closing schedules and was not able to implement the internal controls and processes to ensure that the general ledger and the unaudited REAC submission was complete and accurate. Effect: The general ledger and the unaudited data submitted to REAC required numerous and material audit adjustments that delayed the audit, and therefore HUD could not provide proper timely financial oversight based on the unaudited REAC submission. Auditor’s Recommendations: The Authority should continue to develop and implement internal controls over both internal and external reporting, and the year-end close process to ensure reporting remains accurate and timely, with any unexpected financial data being investigated and corrected before it is reported. The Authority should consider additional staff training on development activities. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-002 Eligibility Moving to Work Demonstration Program AL No. 14.881 Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 17,109 of Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and 2,511 Low Rent Public Housing tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (a total of 36 tenants selected for testing): • Twelve files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, • Ten files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Eight files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Five files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Five files did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income, • Three files did not use the correct payment standard, • One file did not have the documentation necessary to verify utility allowance, • One file did not have necessary support to agree to Housing assistance payment (“HAP”), and • One file did not have an inspection performed during the year. Low Rent Public Housing (a total of 40 tenants selected for testing): • Twenty-seven files did not contain flat rent options forms, • Twenty-one files did not have a 214 declaration for a member of the household, • Seventeen files did not have annual recertifications performed within 12 months of the previous annual certification, • Thirteen files did not have income support necessary to verify tenant income, • Nine files did not have 9886 release of information form within 15 months of the annual recertification, • Six files did not have the annual recertification performed or documented, and • Three files had 50058 forms displaying different rent payments than those on the rent roll. Criteria: The Authority’s ACOP, Administrative Plan, 24 CFR 960.259, and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 484 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Mainstream Voucher AL #14.879 (a total of 4 tenants selected for testing): • One file did not have an annual recertification performed during the year, • One file did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Two files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, • One file did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, and • One file did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income. Emergency Housing Voucher AL #14.871 (a total of 5 tenants selected for testing): • Four files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Four files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, and • Five files did not have rent reasonableness form performed for the annual certification. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 484 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Mainstream Voucher AL #14.879 (a total of 4 tenants selected for testing): • One file did not have an annual recertification performed during the year, • One file did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Two files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, • One file did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, and • One file did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income. Emergency Housing Voucher AL #14.871 (a total of 5 tenants selected for testing): • Four files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Four files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, and • Five files did not have rent reasonableness form performed for the annual certification. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-003 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 484 of Housing Voucher Cluster tenants the following deficiencies were noted: Mainstream Voucher AL #14.879 (a total of 4 tenants selected for testing): • One file did not have an annual recertification performed during the year, • One file did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Two files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, • One file did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, and • One file did not have documentation necessary to verify the reported income. Emergency Housing Voucher AL #14.871 (a total of 5 tenants selected for testing): • Four files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household, • Four files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 month of the annual recertification, and • Five files did not have rent reasonableness form performed for the annual certification. Criteria: The Authority’s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population from each program as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 524 of tenants, 15 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: • Fourteen files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Thirteen files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, and • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household. Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 524 of tenants, 15 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: • Fourteen files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Thirteen files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, and • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household. Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
2022-004 Eligibility Section 8 Project-Based Cluster Material Weakness in Internal Control Material Noncompliance Condition: Out of an approximate population of 524 of tenants, 15 tenant files were tested and the following deficiencies were noted: • Fourteen files did not have 9886 release of information forms within 15 months of annual recertification, • Thirteen files did not have an annual recertification performed within 12 months, • Three files did not have annual recertifications performed during the year, and • Three files did not have a 214 declaration form for all members of the household. Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Context: The auditor randomly selected tenant files out of the population as outlined, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size. The auditor reviewed the tenant files and support to ensure that proper procedures are being followed and that the Authority is in compliance with HUD requirements regarding timely, complete, and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced staffing and operational challenges during the onset of COVID-19 and did not have the available staff to follow the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely recertifications and collection of required HUD documentation to verify eligibility and calculate accurate housing assistance payments. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD requirements regarding eligibility which could result in the incorrect amount of rental assistance provided. Questioned Costs: Unknown. Auditor Recommendations: The Authority should reevaluate their established procedures and controls in place to ensure full compliance in regards to eligibility and the timeliness of recertifications. The Authority needs to correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and consider the impact to the rest of the population of tenant files that were not selected as part of the auditor’s sample. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.