Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
61,799
In database
Filtered Results
23,815
Matching current filters
Showing Page
395 of 953
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Active filters: Questioned Costs
Finding 571537 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Audit Finding Reference: 2023-001 - Improve Controls and Documentation over Reporting Process Planned Corrective Action: The Town acknowledges the discrepancy noted in the audit finding regarding the timing and documentation of expenditures included in the P&E Annual Report for the ARPA grant. We a...
Audit Finding Reference: 2023-001 - Improve Controls and Documentation over Reporting Process Planned Corrective Action: The Town acknowledges the discrepancy noted in the audit finding regarding the timing and documentation of expenditures included in the P&E Annual Report for the ARPA grant. We appreciate the opportunity to address this issue and confirm that we will implement improvements to strengthen our reporting process. Moving forward, the Town will utilize the MUNIS accounting system more effectively to ensure all expenditures are properly recorded and reported within the appropriate reporting periods. In addition, internal procedures will be reviewed and updated to reinforce timely data entry and review of grant-related transactions. Responsible staff have been made aware of the finding, and steps will be taken to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements. Planned Implementation Date of Corrective Action: May 2025 Persion Resonsible for Corrective Action: Stephanie Pemberton, Town Accountant Please consider this the Town's official corrective action response to be included in the final audit report.
Oversight Agency for Audit Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023. Name of independent accounting firm: Haynie & Company Audit Period: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The ...
Oversight Agency for Audit Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023. Name of independent accounting firm: Haynie & Company Audit Period: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. The finding from the December 31, 2023 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs is discussed below. Finding 2023-1 Comments of the finding and recommendation: Management agrees with the finding. Action taken: We will assign the Executive Director to oversee all federal reporting deadlines and implement a centralized compliance calendar with automated reminders. Internal policies will be updated to require a formal review of reporting documents at least 45 days prior to submission deadlines. Additionally, relevant staff will receive training on Uniform Guidance requirements, and quarterly compliance meetings will be held to monitor progress. These actions are intended to ensure timely and accurate future submissions in accordance with federal regulations. If the oversight agency has questions regarding this plan, please email Steven Cordova, executive director of Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries at scordova@totalconcept.net. Sincerely yours, Tri-County Housing, Inc. dba Total Concept & Subsidiaries
Finding No. 2023-007 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordanc...
Finding No. 2023-007 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordance with the Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities (570.202(b)(2) and/or (11)) during the grant period.. Condition The owner paid 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested, that was not incurred during the grant period and charged through to and was reimbursed by PHB under their CDBG Grant. Cause REACH's Community Builders Program Manager did not ensure that the invoices were for the appropriate grant period. Effect or Potential Effect CDBG funds may be spent inappropriately and REACH may be required to repay the grants and it may also result in a possible loss of future grants. Questioned Costs: $35. Context In connection with the procedures applied to compliance testing, there was 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested that was not for cost incurred during the grant period. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation REACH Community Builders Program Manager should follow procedures to ensure each vendor invoice is incurred during the grant period. Views of Responsible Officials Community Builders Program cell phone billing is part of the larger REACH billing system and this does create some challenges in approving billing as our IT department approves this billing. We are putting systems in place for the Community Builders Program Manager will work closer with the finance team to ensure all billing involves are for the correct time periods.
View Audit 362297 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2023-006 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordanc...
Finding No. 2023-006 CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.218 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: A-Allowable Costs Criteria Owners must use CDBG funded portion of programs to fund minor rehabilitation services to approved recipients /address' in accordance with the Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities (570.202(b)(2) and/or (11)). Condition The owner paid 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested, that were not listed on the CDBG Address List as reported to Portland Housing Bureau (“PHB”) and charged through to and was reimbursed by PHB under their CDBG Grant. Cause REACH's Community Builders Program Manager did not ensure that the invoices were for an approved CDBG property. Effect or Potential Effect CDBG funds may be spent inappropriately and REACH may be required to repay the grants and it may also result in a possible loss of future grants. Questioned Costs: $40. Context In connection with the procedures applied to compliance testing, there was 1 vendor invoice of 79 tested that was not for an approved CDBG property. Repeat Finding: Yes – Finding 2022-007 Recommendation REACH Community Builders Program Manager should follow procedures to match each vendor invoice to the approved CDBG property listing prior to coding to CDBG and passing through for reimbursement from this grant. Views of Responsible Officials This instance was $40 that was in fact allocated incorrectly and the $40 spend was paid back to PHB in October 2024.
View Audit 362297 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding No. 2023-004 HUD Low Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 Federal Assistance Listing Number #99.999 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria In accordance with the Use Agreement, Housing Quality Standards require th...
Finding No. 2023-004 HUD Low Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 Federal Assistance Listing Number #99.999 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N- Special Tests and Provisions Criteria In accordance with the Use Agreement, Housing Quality Standards require that the Owner shall maintain the property in good repair and condition. Condition Management did not have in place proper procedures and controls to ensure that HQS inspections were performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Cause Management did not perform HQS inspections during the year ended December 31 2023. Effect or Potential Effect Housing units may be out of compliance with HUD Quality Standards. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to tenant file testing there were 3 instances of the 3 files tested where the passing HQS inspections were not performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation Management should resume making sure all units meet the HUD Housing Quality Standards and ensure that the responses to any findings are cleared timely. Views of Responsible Officials REACH did return to doing HQS Inspections in 2023, with staffing shortages it is possible that not every unit was inspected in 2023. Specifically, around the 3 instances of the 3 files tested after the finding were provided to REACH we provided the annual inspection for unit #11 at Beacon. For unit #5 at Beacon the annual inspection was not in the current resident file that was tested because the unit was vacant at the time of 2023 annual inspection. The annual inspection for the last file at Taylor this inspection was missed due to staffing changes at the time. REACH continued to reestablish our annual unit inspection process post COVID in 2024.
Finding No. 2023-003 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Each owner must comply with the requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 92 regulations as outlined in the "Compliance in HOME Re...
Finding No. 2023-003 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Each owner must comply with the requirements set forth in 24 CFR Part 92 regulations as outlined in the "Compliance in HOME Rental Projects: A Guide for Property Owners" published by HUD which requires the property to maintain the contracted number of HOME units as well as the designated splits in bedroom size and High Home/Low Home unit ratios. Condition The owner did not make available to HOME tenants the contracted number and type of HOME units. Cause Management’s policies with respect to maintaining the number and split of contracted HOME units were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect The procedures for determining and maintaining the correct HOME units within the property were not applied. This could result in ineligible tenants occupying HOME designated units. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our HOME units testing, one of the five properties tested did not meet the contracted HOME units size portfolio (there should be four 3-bedroom units (there are 5); and there should be three 4-bedroom units (there are 2)). Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-003 Recommendation Management should follow procedures in place to ensure consistent application and adherence to the requirements in accordance with the “Compliance in HOME Rental Projects: A Guide for Property Owners” published by HUD. Views of Responsible Officials A unit will be re-classified the next time there is a vacant unit of the corresponding size/type.
Finding No. 2023-002 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Compliance in State ...
Finding No. 2023-002 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: E-Eligibility Criteria Tenant lease files are required to be maintained and tenant eligibility determined in accordance with the Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual. Condition In connection with our lease file review we noted four instances of eight tenants tested where management did not provide support that they performed a 3rd party income verification in accordance with policy. Cause Management’s policies with respect to recertifications and eligibility and the maintenance of tenant lease files in accordance with Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual were not consistently followed. Effect or Potential Effect This could result in units being rented to ineligible tenants. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to our HOME units testing, four of the eight tenants tested did not have the a 3rd party income verification in accordance with policy. Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-002 Recommendation Management should establish procedures and monitor compliance with those procedures to ensure that recertifications and correct income verification procedures are performed timely, tenant eligibility is correctly determined and that tenant lease files are properly maintained in accordance with the requirements of Compliance in State of Oregon Housing and Community Services HOME Program Compliance Manual. Views of Responsible Officials For the properties in Washington, they have several sources of HOME funds based on the issuing jurisdiction State, County or City that adds a layer of complexity to the recertification process and due to staffing turnover, both at the properties and REACH main office some of the HOME 3rd party income verifications were missed at recertification. Management has established policies and procedures for complying with the HOME program which includes a centralized tracker for HOME certifications.
Finding No. 2023-001 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N-Special Tests and Provisions Criteria During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the nonfederal entity must maintain subsidized...
Finding No. 2023-001 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program Federal Assistance Listing Number #14.239 Uniform Guidance Compliance Requirement Code: N-Special Tests and Provisions Criteria During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the nonfederal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than (a) every three years for projects containing one to four units, (b) every two years for projects containing five to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME/HOME-ARP-assisted tenant- based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Condition The owner did not ensure passing HQS inspections were performed during 2023. Cause Management did not have in place proper procedures and controls to ensure that HQS inspections were performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Effect or Potential Effect Housing units may be out of compliance with HUD Quality Standards. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context In connection with the procedures applied to tenant file testing there were 8 instances of the 8 files tested where the passing HQS inspections were not performed during the year ended December 31, 2023. Repeat Finding: Yes - Finding 2022-001 Recommendation Management should resume making sure all units meet the HUD Housing Quality Standards and ensure that the responses to any findings are cleared timely. Views of Responsible Officials REACH did return to doing HQS Inspections in 2023. With staffing shortages, it is possible that not every unit was inspected in 2023. REACH continued to reestablish our annual unit inspection process post COVID in 2024. For the finding related to Addy St. This property is managed by a 3rd party management company, REACH’s Asset Management team will work with the management company to ensure all inspections are happening.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-002 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Managemen...
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Name of auditee: Friends of the Mission Finding: 2023-002 Name of audit firm: Propp Christensen Caniglia LLP Period covered by the audit: January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 CAP prepared by: Scott Thurmond, Executive Director Telephone: (916) 416-0901 Comments: Management agrees with the finding. Actions: Management will ensure that audited financial statements are submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the required time frame.
Finding 571294 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Finding 2023-002 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria...
Finding 2023-002 – Education Stabilization Fund – AL No.’s 84.425D & 84.425U Department of Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Related to Internal Control over Compliance of the Major Program Criteria: Where employees work solely or partially on a single Federal program or cost objective, their salaries or wages must be supported by periodic certification that the employee worked on these programs for the period covered by the programs. The certifications should be prepared at least semi-annually, and or monthly and should be signed by the employee or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee. Condition: During our test of controls over compliance with time and effort certifications the school department was not able to provide evidence that required certifications of time and effort for those employees whose time was spent either completely or partially spent on these programs were performed as required by Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: Unknown Context: During our test of payroll transactions of the Education Stabilization Fund grants it was noted that the time and effort certifications did not meet the semiannual and or monthly certification requirements. Effect: The School Department was not in compliance with the time and effort certification requirements. Cause: The School Department completed time and effort certifications on an annual basis rather than semi-annual or monthly. Identification as a Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the School Department follow procedures to ensure that semi-annual certifications and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by either the employees and/or supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees in a timely manner in order to comply with the time and effort certification requirement. Managements Response: We acknowledge and agree with the recommendation to ensure that semi-annual and/or monthly certifications are prepared and signed by employees and/or supervisory officials who have first-hand knowledge of the work performed by the employees. We understand the importance of complying with the time and effort certification requirements. We would like to communicate that annual certifications were completed in FY 23, however, we will ensure that moving forward these certifications will be on a semi-annual and/or monthly basis. Responsible for Corrective Plan: School Business Manager Estimated Completion Date: Fiscal Year 2024 Action Taken: The Schools are now ensuring that their annual certification process be completed on a semi-annual and/or monthly basis, whichever is deemed necessary for the related position wages.
STDC acknowledges the auditor's finding regarding the inclusion of $12,153 in administrative costs in a supplemental reimbursement request submitted via Form B-13 to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program – Part B. The costs in question lacked cont...
STDC acknowledges the auditor's finding regarding the inclusion of $12,153 in administrative costs in a supplemental reimbursement request submitted via Form B-13 to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program – Part B. The costs in question lacked contemporaneous supporting documentation at the time of audit review. While STDC maintains that all costs submitted were incurred in good faith to support the Ryan White program, the lack of appropriate documentation constitutes a lapse in internal controls by the former Finance Director, Julia Gonzalez, over post-award claims processing. STDC has initiated an internal review and will consult with DSHS to determine the appropriate repayment action. Additional controls and protocols are being implemented to ensure that all future reimbursement requests—especially post-period—are fully documented, verified, and approved. Corrective Action Plan Finding Number: 2023-02 Planned Completion Date: July 31, 2025 Responsible Official: Director of Finance Corrective Actions to Be Implemented: 1. Policy and Procedure Development STDC shall develop a written policy governing post-award and supplemental reimbursement requests, with clear requirements for documentation and approval. The policy will define acceptable forms of documentation, including invoices, time records, internal allocation spreadsheets, and procurement records. 2. Document Verification Protocol Require pre-submission validation of all reimbursement entries by the Finance Director. 3. Supervisory Review and Sign-Off Supplemental claims must receive sign-off from both the Finance Director and the Executive Director prior to submission. Claims will include documentation verification and reconciliation to program records. 4. Training Ensure all finance department staff involved in grant accounting and reporting are trained on documentation requirements under 2 CFR Part 200, and internal review protocols for final and supplemental financial reports. 5. Communication with DSHS STDC will communicate with DSHS regarding the questioned costs and will take appropriate action based on agency guidance, including cost disallowance and repayment as required. 6. Quarterly Internal Reconciliation Establish recurring quarterly reviews of actual costs incurred versus amounts reimbursed to identify discrepancies and prevent accumulation of unsupported claims.   Policy Title: Post-Award Reimbursement and Documentation Policy Effective Date: July 10, 2025, or upon adoption by the STDC Board of Directors Applies to: Finance Department, Grants Compliance, Department Heads Purpose To ensure that all reimbursement requests, including post-award and supplemental claims, are adequately documented, supported, and reviewed in compliance with 2 CFR §200 Subpart E. Policy Overview STDC shall not submit for reimbursement any cost for which contemporaneous and auditable documentation is not available. All supplemental reimbursement submissions must undergo a formal review and approval process to ensure the allowability, allocability, and documentation of all requested costs. Procedures 1. Required Documentation: Every cost line item included in a supplemental reimbursement must be supported by original documentation including: o General ledger detail o Paid invoice or payroll record o Allocation spreadsheet (if applicable) o Program approval or correspondence 2. Review Process: The Department Heads, or their designee, will verify that all documents meet federal allowability and documentation standards prior to submission to the Finance Department. A Supplemental Reimbursement Review Checklist must be completed and signed before submission of any supplemental requests. 3. Approval Authority: Final approval must be obtained from the Finance Director and Executive Director. 4. Retention Requirements: All reimbursement submissions and supporting documentation must be retained according to the STDC Local Record Retention Schedule. 5. Reporting Discrepancies: Any discrepancy, missing documentation, or unsupported cost identified must be reported to the Finance Director immediately for resolution before claim submission.
View Audit 362192 Questioned Costs: $1
Management agrees with the finding and has updated its internal lost revenue calculation, with cumulative amounts through Period 6 reporting. While management did attempt to update its lost revenue amounts with filing of its Period 4 reports, additional data entry errors were made. Four out of the s...
Management agrees with the finding and has updated its internal lost revenue calculation, with cumulative amounts through Period 6 reporting. While management did attempt to update its lost revenue amounts with filing of its Period 4 reports, additional data entry errors were made. Four out of the six entities that need to report on PRF funding have no further reporting periods; therefore, the Organization has no ability to make further corrections. As such, the internal records maintained by the Organization must serve as teh final reporting of the PRF funding.
Condition: The Organization could not provide one salary authorization from for sample selection of 40 employees. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a process to ensure that all salary authorizations are properly obtained and stored. When there is any change in an employee...
Condition: The Organization could not provide one salary authorization from for sample selection of 40 employees. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a process to ensure that all salary authorizations are properly obtained and stored. When there is any change in an employee's status or salary, an Employee Status Form is completed and signed by the employee, their supervisor, and Human Resources, and when required by the COO and CEO. Additionally, the salary authorization form is added to a secure shared file drive. The shared file drive includes a section where all salary changes are listed. Both HR and Finance initial off to confirm that each salary change is supported by the proper documentation during the payroll review process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Condition: No documentation of employee time approval by supervisors could be provided. The payroll clerk processes the payroll and finance director approves through the releasing of the payroll. However, there is no formal documentation of the overall review of the payroll process and the supervi...
Condition: No documentation of employee time approval by supervisors could be provided. The payroll clerk processes the payroll and finance director approves through the releasing of the payroll. However, there is no formal documentation of the overall review of the payroll process and the supervisors' approval to time recorded by employees. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a new payroll process using the ADP system. Employees are now required to approve their own time within the ADP portal, and this approval is documented. Following this, supervisors review and approve their employee's time, which is also documented in the portal. Human Resources then prepares the payroll, reviewing all entries and initialing a shared file of payroll items and providing backup for changes. Once HR confirms accuracy, they notify Finance. Finance then reviews the payroll, with the Finance Manager providing the final approval within ADP once all items are confirmed. The entire process is fully documented, with approvals recorded within the ADP by employees and supervisors and the shared file drive where HR and Finance intimal off on the reviewed payroll times, ensuring a traceable record of the entire payroll approval process. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Condition: The Organization did not maintain property documentation to support the review of the report prior to submission to the grantor, other than the review done by the preparer. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hire a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting ...
Condition: The Organization did not maintain property documentation to support the review of the report prior to submission to the grantor, other than the review done by the preparer. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hire a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. The accounting staff was restructured in November 2024 with the addition of a Finance Manager and Senior Accountant to strengthen internal controls and facilitate segregation of duties and best practices for day-to-day activities. In addition to review of month-end journal entries, reporting requirements with additional review as also implemented in 2025. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Condition: The Organization lacks consistently applied processes and procedures related to the application of the sliding fee scale. The Organization also lacks a clear review process related to the sliding fee scale to identify errors quickly to allow for corrections to be made in a timely manner....
Condition: The Organization lacks consistently applied processes and procedures related to the application of the sliding fee scale. The Organization also lacks a clear review process related to the sliding fee scale to identify errors quickly to allow for corrections to be made in a timely manner. Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has hired a new Chief Financial Officer as well as additional supporting staff within the finance department. The Billing and Collections Policy was updated to waive co-pays for students in the School-Based Program. The Billing Department is in the process of auditing and implementing quarterly feedback & training sessions for the Operations Department for training and compliance for the Sliding Fee Discount Program. This process was implemented in 2025. Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Joe Derry, Chief Financial Officer. Anticipated Completion Date: Implemented.
Finding caption: The Authority did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal maintenance of effort requirements. Name, address, and telephone of Authority contact person: Rina Yu, Senior Accountant 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 110 Kent WA 98032 253-856-4303 Correct...
Finding caption: The Authority did not have adequate internal controls for ensuring compliance with federal maintenance of effort requirements. Name, address, and telephone of Authority contact person: Rina Yu, Senior Accountant 20811 84th Avenue South, Suite 110 Kent WA 98032 253-856-4303 Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: General Response: Puget Sound Fire respectfully disagrees with the Auditor's decision to elevate the two issues identified below to the level of a finding. Puget Sound Fire believes it substantially complied with the MOE and other grant requirements identified in issue 1 and worked closely with the granting agency, FEMA, to comply with all grant requirements. Based on the specific responses below, and Puget Sound Fire's good faith and reasonable efforts to cooperate and comply with the grant requirements, we respectfully request that the items be addressed in a management letter rather than a finding. Issue 1: Maintenance of Effort Puget Sound Fire respectfully disagrees with the Auditor's proposed finding. Puget Sound Fire did maintain and document the Maintenance of Effort attestation as described in the AFG grant's Notice of Funding Opportunity and followed best practices for tracking fiscal budget information as previously prescribed by SAO personnel. Puget Sound Fire's compliance is demonstrated in the 3-year budget history within the grant application/contract itself and Puget Sound Fi re provided SAO support Maintenance of Effort calculations for the years the grant was awarded. Puget Sound Fire Puget Sound Fire's governing board also approved budget increases year over year for the duration of the grant that exceeded the 80% average requirement. There is no 2 CFR Part 200 guidance on MOE other than what is included in the NOFO, and as an attestation, and the 3-year budget history was acceptable by FEMA, the grantor. Additionally, a finding is not warranted as following receipt of the same finding for the 2021 audit Puget Sound Fire adopted the SA O's feedback and has been following that guidance since then. Basing a finding for the current audit for actions that have been corrected pursuant to a prior audit is unreasonable. Puget Sound Fire complied with the MOE requirements following the 2021 finding and has no ability to go back to 2021 and change the past. Puget Sound Fire also notes that Puget Sound Fire's MOE efforts were reviewed, approved and monitored by FEMA, the grantor without issue. Puget Sound Fire has worked with and will continue to work with the grantor moving forward to implement best practices in calculating and maintaining MOE. AFG NOFO Statement - Maintenance of Effort A maintenance of effort is required under this program for all recipients, unless modified by a waiver, subject to waiver eligibility.An applicant seeking an award under this NOFO shall agree to maintain during the term of the grant, the applicant's aggregate expenditures relating to the activities allowable under this NOFO at not less than 80 percent of the average amount of such expenditures in the two fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the grant award is received. For more information on waiver eligibility, please see Appendix C-Award Administration Information, Section I. Economic Hardship Waivers of Cost Share and Maintenance of Effort Requirements for the FP&S Grant Program for more information. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: Puget Sound Fire thanks the Washington State Auditor's Office for its thorough review of fiscal years 2021 through 2023. We are committed to implementing the recommended corrective actions, enhancing our internal controls, and addressing all identified deficiencies. Corrective actions for the three issues identified by the SAO have been initiated and will be fully implemented by January 1, 2026. Issue 1: Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Puget Sound Fire currently maintains and documents the MOE attestation in accordance with applicable Federal Notices of Funding Opportunities. To further improve compliance, we will work directly with our grantors to ensure MOE calculations align with best practices and updated guidance. This action will be completed by January 1, 2026.
Description of Finding: Payroll charges for grants were based on a percentage of time reported by employees. The percentage was based on management’s decision and set when budgeting and not based on actual hours worked. There was not sufficient documentation to provide the basis for an appropriate a...
Description of Finding: Payroll charges for grants were based on a percentage of time reported by employees. The percentage was based on management’s decision and set when budgeting and not based on actual hours worked. There was not sufficient documentation to provide the basis for an appropriate allocation of payroll charges to the federal program. Planned Corrective Action: To ensure accurate payroll allocation to federal programs, YWCA New Hampshire will implement the following: 1. Time and Effort Reporting: Implement a time and effort reporting system by August 31, 2025, requiring employees to track actual hours worked on grant-funded activities weekly. 2. Policy Update: Revise the Payroll Allocation Policy to mandate that payroll charges to grants be based on actual hours worked, supported by time and effort reports. 3. Training: Train all grant-funded employees and supervisors on the time and effort reporting system by September 15, 2025. 4. Certification Process: Require employees and supervisors to certify time and effort reports monthly, with certifications retained for audit purposes. 36 5. Monitoring: The Finance Manager will review time and effort reports quarterly to ensure accurate allocation, with findings reported to the Executive Director. Responsible Party: Finance Manager, overseen by Caroline Catlender, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2025
View Audit 361880 Questioned Costs: $1
Description of Finding: A payment made for food for an event was submitted for reimbursement under the VOCA program, and VOCA specifically prohibits the use of federal funds for food and beverages for conferences. Planned Corrective Action: The organization has ceased offering the services related t...
Description of Finding: A payment made for food for an event was submitted for reimbursement under the VOCA program, and VOCA specifically prohibits the use of federal funds for food and beverages for conferences. Planned Corrective Action: The organization has ceased offering the services related to the VOCA grant. That being said, the organization will implement a policy that will prevent unallowed costs under the VOCA program or a similar program by implementing the following: 1. Policy Update: Revise the Grant Compliance Policy to include a clear list of unallowed costs under VOCA and other federal programs, with specific reference to food and beverage restrictions. 2. Pre-Approval Process: Require all VOCA-related expenses to be pre-approved by the Grant Manager, who will verify compliance with VOCA guidelines. 3. Training: Conduct training for all staff involved in VOCA program spending on allowable and unallowed costs by June 30, 2025. 4. Repayment: Reimburse the VOCA program for the unallowed food expense from nonfederal funds by June 15, 2025, and document the transaction. 5. Monitoring: The Grant Manager will perform quarterly reviews of VOCA expenditures to ensure compliance, with results reported to the Executive Director. Responsible Party: Grant Manager, overseen by Caroline Catlender, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: July 15, 2025
View Audit 361880 Questioned Costs: $1
Description of Finding: The monthly narrative reports and beneficiary reports required to be submitted under the CDBG program were unable to be located, and therefore it cannot be determined if the reports were at all submitted as required. Planned Corrective Action: The organization has ceased offe...
Description of Finding: The monthly narrative reports and beneficiary reports required to be submitted under the CDBG program were unable to be located, and therefore it cannot be determined if the reports were at all submitted as required. Planned Corrective Action: The organization has ceased offering the services related to this grant. That being said, the organization will ensure timely and accurate report filing for all the grant programs that they participate in going forward. The YWCA New Hampshire will implement the following: 1. Report Tracking System: Develop a centralized report tracking system by July 15, 2025, to log all required reports, submission dates, and confirmation of receipt. 2. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Create SOPs for report preparation and submission, specifying responsible staff, deadlines, and documentation requirements. 3. Training: Train program staff on the SOPs and tracking system by July 31, 2025. 4. Backup Documentation: Store all reports and submission confirmations in a secure digital repository, accessible for audits. 5. Monthly Compliance Checks: The Program Manager will review the tracking system monthly to ensure all reports are submitted on time, with findings reported to the Executive Director. Responsible Party: Program Manager, overseen by Caroline Catlender, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: August 15, 2025
View Audit 361880 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 570915 (2023-002)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Description of Finding: Payroll documentation was found to be inadequate, as there were missing approved pay rates, lack of supporting documentation for stipends and differentials paid, and timecards submitted which were not approved, mathematically incorrect, and/or which did not agree to the payro...
Description of Finding: Payroll documentation was found to be inadequate, as there were missing approved pay rates, lack of supporting documentation for stipends and differentials paid, and timecards submitted which were not approved, mathematically incorrect, and/or which did not agree to the payroll paid. Planned Corrective Action: To strengthen internal controls over payroll, YWCA New Hampshire will implement the following: 1. Payroll Policy Revision: Update the Payroll Policy to require documented approval of pay rates, stipends, and differentials, with all documentation retained in employee files. 34 2. Timecard Approval Process: Implement an electronic timekeeping system by July 31, 2025, requiring supervisor approval of timecards before payroll processing. The system will flag mathematical errors and discrepancies. 3. Training: Provide training for supervisors and payroll staff on the new timekeeping system and documentation requirements by August 15, 2025. 4. Reconciliation Process: The Payroll Coordinator will perform a monthly reconciliation of timecards against payroll records, with discrepancies investigated and resolved before finalizing payroll. 5. Audit Checks: The CFO will conduct quarterly audits of payroll records to ensure compliance with the updated policy, with results reported to the Executive Director. Responsible Party: Payroll Coordinator and Finance Manager, overseen by Caroline Catlender, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: August 15, 2025
View Audit 361880 Questioned Costs: $1
Finding 570914 (2023-001)
Significant Deficiency 2023
Description of Finding: A disbursement made to a vendor was not supported with adequate documentation to support the payment that was made. Planned Corrective Action: To address the lack of adequate documentation for vendor disbursements, YWCA New Hampshire will implement the following measures: 1. ...
Description of Finding: A disbursement made to a vendor was not supported with adequate documentation to support the payment that was made. Planned Corrective Action: To address the lack of adequate documentation for vendor disbursements, YWCA New Hampshire will implement the following measures: 1. Policy Update: Revise the Financial Management Policy to mandate that all disbursements require supporting documentation, including invoices, purchase orders, and approval signatures, before processing. 2. Training: Conduct mandatory training for all staff involved in procurement and payment processes on proper documentation requirements by June 30, 2025. 3. Internal Review Process: Establish a pre-payment review checklist to be completed by the Finance Manager to ensure all required documentation is present. 4. Document Retention: Implement a digital filing system, through Bill.com, to store and organize all disbursement-related documents, ensuring easy retrieval for audits. 5. Monitoring: The CFO will conduct monthly reviews of a sample of disbursements to verify compliance, with findings reported to the Executive Director. Responsible Party: Finance Manager, overseen by Caroline Catlender, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: July 31, 2025
View Audit 361880 Questioned Costs: $1
2023-001 Late Single Audit Submissions Category: Material weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Condition: The Authority has not timely submitted the Single Audit Reporting Packages for the years ended June 30, 2022, and 2023. Management’s Response: Starting in FY 2024-2025, the Fi...
2023-001 Late Single Audit Submissions Category: Material weakness in Internal Control and Material Noncompliance Condition: The Authority has not timely submitted the Single Audit Reporting Packages for the years ended June 30, 2022, and 2023. Management’s Response: Starting in FY 2024-2025, the Finance Department will maintain detailed records of all payments made, deposits received, and the reimbursement and transfer processes. This approach ensures that all reports are completed in a timely manner. To strengthen internal control over accounts, disbursements, and fund entries, the LRA’s Finance Department will hire additional personnel. These new team members are responsible for updating and managing accounting records. Together, they have established a strict timeline for completing important tasks to ensure a clear and concise flow of funds. The workloads will be divided among the team, with specific responsibilities assigned for Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable, Bank Reconciliation, and Bookkeeping. Some responsibilities are interlinked, allowing team members to support one another in the event of absence or the need for assistance and providing documents to the external audits for the Single Audits. Person in charge: Juan C. Rodriguez Rivera Accounting Official 787-705-7188 Juan.rodriguez@lra.pr.gov Implementation Date: FY 2024-2025
The organization agrees with the finding. The organization will implement a method to ensure accrued vacation is appropriately adjusted and vacation costs are accurately recorded and allocated to grants. Completed in FY2023-2024
The organization agrees with the finding. The organization will implement a method to ensure accrued vacation is appropriately adjusted and vacation costs are accurately recorded and allocated to grants. Completed in FY2023-2024
The organization agrees with the finding. Now that the organization has filled the accounting director position the delinquent audits are being completed as efficiently as possible.
The organization agrees with the finding. Now that the organization has filled the accounting director position the delinquent audits are being completed as efficiently as possible.
« 1 393 394 396 397 953 »