1. Current Findings on the Schedule of Finding, Questioned Cost and Recommendation a. Finding 2022-001 (14.157 ? Supportive Housing for the Elderly ? Section 202 Capital Advance) Tenant Files Condition: Move-ins: 1. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the employment income ...
1. Current Findings on the Schedule of Finding, Questioned Cost and Recommendation a. Finding 2022-001 (14.157 ? Supportive Housing for the Elderly ? Section 202 Capital Advance) Tenant Files Condition: Move-ins: 1. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the employment income reported on Form HUD-50059 was $11,400; however, the supporting documentation verified in the tenant file, indicated $15,678 ($10,05 per hour for 30 hours per week, over 52 weeks). 2. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the ?Non-Smoking Lease Addendum? was not signed by management. 3. In one (1) instance out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the ?Non-Smoking Lease Addendum? identified the Project as Terra Quest, Inc. 4. In three (3) instances out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the Security Deposit Agreement was not maintained in the tenant?s file. 5. In three (3) instances out of nine (9) tenant files tested, the Security Deposit Agreement was not signed by management. Recertification: 1. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the Notice and Consent for the Release of Information (Form 9887) was not dated by the tenant. 2. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the Applicant?s/Tenant?s Consent to the Release of Information (Form 9887-A) was not dated by the tenant. 3. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the Verification of Criminal Background Check form was not signed by the tenant. 4. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the Form HUD-50059 was not dated by the tenant. 5. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the ?EIV? document was not maintained in the tenant file, for verification of the tenant?s income. 6. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the Housing quality inspection form was not maintained in the tenant?s file. 7. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the ?Lease Addendum, for Violence Against Women and Justice Department Reauthorization Act of 2005? was not dated by the tenant. 8. In five (5) instances out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the ?Notification of rent increase resulting from recertification process ? Section 202 PRAC?s form? was not maintained the tenant?s file. 9. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the ?Notification of rent increase resulting from recertification process ? Section 202 PRAC?s form? was addressed to another tenant. 10. In one (1) instance out of eight (8) tenant files tested, the Quality Assurance Information form was not dated by the tenant. Move-outs: 1. In one (1) instance out of three (3) tenant files selected for testing, the tenant file could not be located. 2. In one (1) instance out of two (2) tenant files tested, the security deposit disposition notice was not maintained in the tenant file. (1) Comments on the Finding and Each Recommendation. Management concurs with the finding and the auditor?s recommendation that Ridgeview Terrace, Inc. process applicants and tenants, including recertification of tenants in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to the tenant occupying the unit. By performing these procedures, the risk of incurring questioned costs will be significantly reduced. (2) Actions Taken on the Finding. Corrected going forward.