For clarity the Department will create a redundant manual ledger that duplicates the functions of the current ledger and Detailed Transaction Register (DTR).
DMAVS has existing policies and procedures in place to track all federal funds, state funds and mixed funds, and uses spreadsheets for all tr...
For clarity the Department will create a redundant manual ledger that duplicates the functions of the current ledger and Detailed Transaction Register (DTR).
DMAVS has existing policies and procedures in place to track all federal funds, state funds and mixed funds, and uses spreadsheets for all transactions that reconciles every month to NH First Detail Transaction Register (DTR), Federal Fund tracking sheet, and Federal reimbursement tracking sheet with backup documents. The tracking sheet for the federal register is not intended to account for the state share of billing. The state share is accurately accounted for in the DTR, the cumulative accounting in the SF-270 and associated back up documentation. Supporting documentation to substantiate the accuracy of lines a, c, e, and f is in the DTR, the cumulative accounting of each SF-270, the supporting documentation sent with the billing to the Federal Government, and Year-end Agency Report for Federal Awards. This includes reconciliation and analysis of SADB expenditures and revenues to the Statement of Appropriations by each Program Accounting Unit. The SF-270 form is continuous cumulative data that starts Oct 1st and runs through the end of that Federal Fiscal Year.
The SF-270 is the required federal form DMAVS submits to the Federal National Guard Appendix Program Manager for reimbursement. Back up documentation is submitted with the SF-270. The National Guard Appendix Program Manager, National Guard Grants Officer Representative, and National Guard United States Property Fiscal Officer (USPFO)/controller located in Concord, NH review, sign and submit the form to the Department of Defense to affect the cash draw. DMAVS does not unilaterally make cash draws to the federal government. The USPFO, who is substantially involved provides an independent review and reconciles any discrepancies prior to approving any requests for reimbursement.
One possible explanation for the finding is that the selected test works were not continuous.