Corrective Action Plans

Browse how organizations respond to audit findings

Total CAPs
64,113
In database
Filtered Results
11,212
Matching current filters
Showing Page
31 of 449
25 per page

Filters

Clear
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles
The Board will strengthen its internal control procedures over federal program expenditures by enhancing the review and approval process to ensure that all costs charged to federal awards are allowable, allocable, reasonable, and adequately supported in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements ...
The Board will strengthen its internal control procedures over federal program expenditures by enhancing the review and approval process to ensure that all costs charged to federal awards are allowable, allocable, reasonable, and adequately supported in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements and the terms and conditions of applicable grant awards. In addition, the Board will provide training to fiscal and program staff on Federal cost principles, allowability requirements, and appropriate cost allocation methodologies to improve compliance and consistency in the charging of expenditures to Federal (and State) programs.
Prior to recording the expenditure of the virtual reality headsets on the general ledger, Board management sought guidance on multiple attempts from the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) Fiscal T/A division regarding the appropriate treatment of the cost, but did not receive a response before payment...
Prior to recording the expenditure of the virtual reality headsets on the general ledger, Board management sought guidance on multiple attempts from the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) Fiscal T/A division regarding the appropriate treatment of the cost, but did not receive a response before payment was required. However, the Board will continue to work with TWC to determine the appropriate resolution and disposition of the questioned costs and will implement any corrective actions necessary to ensure compliance with Texas Workforce Commission and the Federal requirements as prescribed by the Uniform Guidance.
Marcos Gonzales, Board Financial and Data Analyst
Marcos Gonzales, Board Financial and Data Analyst
Written Policies Required by the Uniform Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws o...
Written Policies Required by the Uniform Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time lapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302(6)); 2) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)); and 3) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431). Although the Township has processes in place to cover these areas, there are no formal written policies covering payments, allowability of costs, and compensation. As a result of this condition, the Township did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance applicable to the above noted grants. Auditor Recommendation: We are aware that the Township is evaluating options using internal and external resources to take corrective action. We recommend that the Township proceed with its selected option as soon as practical, but no later than the end of the next fiscal year. Corrective Action: As noted in the auditor recommendation, the Township is in the process of evaluating a draft grant administration policy, which will address items #1 and #2 (payments and allowability of costs charged to federal programs). Item #3 (compensation) will be addressed via review and modification as needed of the Township’s personnel manual to ensure compliance. Responsible Persons: Karen Trombley, Accounting Coordinator; Sarah Mistretta, Human Resources Director Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026
Noncompliance with Grant Reporting Frequency Requirements Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: Per the grant agreement for funds received from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lake, and Energy ("EGLE") the Township is required to submit financial status reports on a m...
Noncompliance with Grant Reporting Frequency Requirements Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: Per the grant agreement for funds received from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lake, and Energy ("EGLE") the Township is required to submit financial status reports on a monthly basis, but instead submitted their reports on a quarterly basis. The Township failed to file financial status reports as required by the Township's grant agreement with EGLE. As a result of this condition, the Township did not comply fully with the reporting requirements under this federal award. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend that the Township review its procedures for compiling financial data for external reporting purposes and develop a calendar by which grant managers and Township administration are notified of pending due dates. Financial reports should be supported by general ledger reports (which should be retained internally along with a copy of the report) and subjected to review and approval by an independent employee or administrator prior to submission. Corrective Action: The Township will strive to submit required reports to EGLE on a monthly basis as required. Expectation will be established via the grant calendar for this grant to be established as noted in finding 2025-001. Responsible Person: Karen Trombley, Accounting Coordinator Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026
Finding 2025-002: Allowable Costs – Payroll Assistance Listing #: 93.671 Recommendation: Deleon & Stang recommends MSP make changes overall its timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect work performed and if budget estimates are utilized, that they are reconciled and true...
Finding 2025-002: Allowable Costs – Payroll Assistance Listing #: 93.671 Recommendation: Deleon & Stang recommends MSP make changes overall its timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect work performed and if budget estimates are utilized, that they are reconciled and trued up on a consistent basis. Management Response: MSP agrees with the recommendation and remains committed to improving its timekeeping and payroll allocation processes. Management is working with ADP to implement a system that captures actual employee time by program and grant, ensuring payroll costs are accurately charged and supported by documented effort. Until full implementation is complete, periodic reconciliations between budgeted and actual time will be performed. Action Plan: 1. Complete ADP system enhancements that allow employees to record time by department,program, and grant. 2. Establish written procedures requiring staff to allocate hours based on actual workperformed. 3. Implement monthly reviews and reconciliations of payroll allocations against actual timerecords. 4. Train supervisors and employees on the revised timekeeping process. 5. Perform quarterly management reviews of payroll distributions and make necessaryadjustments to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. 6. Target full implementation and testing of the enhanced timekeeping system prior to thenext audit cycle.
Management Response and Corrective Action Plan Finding 2025-001 – Allowability Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Research and Development (R&D) Assistance Listing Number: 93.859 Responsible Individual: BIDMC – Jarod Kohr, Director, Research Finance o...
Management Response and Corrective Action Plan Finding 2025-001 – Allowability Federal Agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Research and Development (R&D) Assistance Listing Number: 93.859 Responsible Individual: BIDMC – Jarod Kohr, Director, Research Finance or The Center - Roy Bourne, Director, Research Finance and Operations Contact Information: BIDMC - jkohr@bidmc.harvard.edu; 617-216-7479 The Center - rbourne2@joslin.harvard.edu; 617-309-5741 A review of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center’s (BIDMC) salary allocation process revealed 53 instances out of approximately 11,000 records of allocation in excess of NIH Salary Cap limits (0.04%). BIDMC acknowledges discovery of system limitations that will correct future instances. Accordingly, management has concluded that controls are operating as intended, but will be enhanced to limit human errors. Corrective Action Plan: - Management will implement a calculation control that will prevent the ability to save changes to salary allocation that exceeds the salary cap for the respective period. (Completed) - Management will implement a calculation control that will prevent the ability to reflect a percent salary higher than the percent effort for any salary cap controlled grant. (Completed) - Management will monitor monthly changes to effort/salary allocations in the Time and Effort system for calculated variances. (Ongoing) Expected Completion Date: October 1, 2026 Status of Completion: In process The Center’s management acknowledges that an invoice was incorrectly matched to a purchase order; however, this was not reflective of the overall control environment. The Center maintains established controls over purchase order invoice processing, including system-generated duplicate invoice detection, cost matching tolerances, and restrictions preventing matching to closed purchase orders. Transactions outside established parameters are automatically flagged for manual review. Management performed a targeted review of these transactions, noting expenditures were properly allocated with the exception of the item noted in this finding. Accordingly, management has concluded that controls are operating effectively overall, Accordingly, management has concluded that controls are operating effectively overall, while continuing to evaluate and enhance processes to further mitigate the risk of recurrence. Corrective Action Plan: - Management will reinforce matching requirements through targeted training and communication with Accounts Payable and Purchasing (Completed) - Periodic reconciliation reviews will be performed to identify and correct any misallocated costs as necessary (Completed) - The Center’s planned implementation of a new ERP system on October 1, 2026 will introduce enhanced automated matching controls, further reducing the likelihood of recurrence Expected Completion Date: October 1, 2026 Status of Completion: In process
Written Policies Required by the Unfiform Grant Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (...
Written Policies Required by the Unfiform Grant Guidance Auditor Description of Criteria, Condition, and Effect: The Uniform Guidance requires a non-federal entity that has expended federal awards for a grant awarded on or after December 26, 2014 to have written policies pertaining to: 1) Payments (draws of federal funds and how to minimize the time lapsing between the receipt of federal funds and the disbursement to contractors/employees/subrecipients) (§200.302(6)); 2) Allowability of costs charged to federal programs (§200.302(7)); and 3) Compensation (personnel and benefits policy) (§200.430 and §200.431). Although the County has processes in place to cover these areas, there are no formal written policies covering payments, allowability of costs, and compensation. As a result of this condition, the County did not fully comply with the Uniform Guidance applicable to the above noted grants. Auditor Recommendation: We are aware that the County is evaluating options using internal and external resources to take corrective action. We recommend that the County proceed with its selected option as soon as practical, but no later than the end of the next fiscal year. Corrective Action: The County will proceed with its selected option no later than the end of the next fiscal year. Responsible Person: Susan Maier, Director of Fiscal Services Anticipated Completion Date: December 31, 2026
Finding 2025-003 Plan: The Director of Affordable Housing will ensure that her staff submit allocation sheets each pay period. The Director will review the allocation sheets for accuracy, and the Director will approve the allocation sheets before submitting to Payroll for processing. The Chief Opera...
Finding 2025-003 Plan: The Director of Affordable Housing will ensure that her staff submit allocation sheets each pay period. The Director will review the allocation sheets for accuracy, and the Director will approve the allocation sheets before submitting to Payroll for processing. The Chief Operating Officer will ensure that the Director of Affordable Housing submits an allocation sheet each pay period. The COO will check the allocation sheet for accuracy before approving the allocation sheet and submitting to Payroll for processing. The allocation sheet submitted will include detailed information on the job duties performed during that pay period by the staff member submitting the allocation sheet. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2025 Contact: Jackie Oliveira, Director of Affordable Housing
Management agrees with the finding. Policies and procedures as described above will be established and implemented during the current year.
Management agrees with the finding. Policies and procedures as described above will be established and implemented during the current year.
PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION The Division will communicate to all units conducting USDA Foods inventory counts the requirement that inventory reports must include documented evidence of review prior to submission. The Division's Social Services department will incorporate verification of documented inv...
PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION The Division will communicate to all units conducting USDA Foods inventory counts the requirement that inventory reports must include documented evidence of review prior to submission. The Division's Social Services department will incorporate verification of documented inventory review into its quarterly internal oversight process to ensure compliance with this requirement on an ongoing basis. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE 10/1/26 RESPONSIBLE CONTACT PERSON Julie Luft, NW Social Services Director
At the time of the audit, we did not have a policy to require managers sign off on credit card payments in the way that they sign off on check payments. We did not require management approval because receipts were required to be submitted with every credit card purchase and reviewed by the finance t...
At the time of the audit, we did not have a policy to require managers sign off on credit card payments in the way that they sign off on check payments. We did not require management approval because receipts were required to be submitted with every credit card purchase and reviewed by the finance team monthly. The policy to require management approval for credit card payments has since been adopted, however, after the fiscal year under audit.
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency will strengthen its procedures to ensure expenditures are charged only within the approved period of performance for each federal grant. Grant period dates will be monitored and reviewed by multiple divisions, including the Grants Section, Payroll Section, and Prog...
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency will strengthen its procedures to ensure expenditures are charged only within the approved period of performance for each federal grant. Grant period dates will be monitored and reviewed by multiple divisions, including the Grants Section, Payroll Section, and Programs Office, to provide additional oversight and verification. Because payroll expenditures are reported and reimbursed on a cash basis and the State payroll expense is in arrears, payroll funding allocations will be reviewed and updated prior to the end of the grant period. Specifically, grant-funded payroll charges will be evaluated at least 30 days before the grant expiration date to ensure that costs incurred after the period of performance are not charged to the grant. These enhanced monitoring and review procedures will help ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and prevent future charges outside the approved grant period.
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency has corrected the program coding within the State's financial system to ensure that each grant is associated with the appropriate Assistance Listing (CFDA) number. To strengthen internal controls and reduce the risk of similar errors in the future, grant setup and ...
The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency has corrected the program coding within the State's financial system to ensure that each grant is associated with the appropriate Assistance Listing (CFDA) number. To strengthen internal controls and reduce the risk of similar errors in the future, grant setup and coding information will be subject to review by multiple individuals prior to implementation. Additionally, annual reviews will be conducted to verify that grant information recorded in the financial system is consistent with the applicable Notice of Award and other grant documentation. These measures are intended to enhance the accuracy of federal program reporting and ensure expenditures are properly attributed to the correct funding source.
There is no direct guidance detailing steps to update the FMAP rate in STAARS. Changes are made in the STAARS cost allocation test environment and then implemented in the production environment via STAARS Support. Cost allocation runs quarterly. While we initiate the entering of statistics from work...
There is no direct guidance detailing steps to update the FMAP rate in STAARS. Changes are made in the STAARS cost allocation test environment and then implemented in the production environment via STAARS Support. Cost allocation runs quarterly. While we initiate the entering of statistics from work sampling and other sources, we are at the mercy of STAARS Support to actually run cost allocation for DHR.
DHR has added additional steps related to Adult Day Care services entered in FACTS. This will ensure entered services reconcile to the approved invoice prior to approval in FACTS.
DHR has added additional steps related to Adult Day Care services entered in FACTS. This will ensure entered services reconcile to the approved invoice prior to approval in FACTS.
However, if this finding is affirmed the corrective action plan will be for the Alabama Military Department to ensure all charges to support federal awards will be charged appropriately in STAARS. Accounting entries in STAARS will be allocable and allowable charges as approved by the Grants Officer.
However, if this finding is affirmed the corrective action plan will be for the Alabama Military Department to ensure all charges to support federal awards will be charged appropriately in STAARS. Accounting entries in STAARS will be allocable and allowable charges as approved by the Grants Officer.
Finding 1218974 (2025-101)
Material Weakness 2025
PAYROLL CONTROLS Criteria: In accordance with the documentation standards of 2 CFR section 200.430(a), costs of compensation for personal services are allowable to the extent the total compensation for individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered, conforms to the established written ...
PAYROLL CONTROLS Criteria: In accordance with the documentation standards of 2 CFR section 200.430(a), costs of compensation for personal services are allowable to the extent the total compensation for individual employees is reasonable for the services rendered, conforms to the established written policy of the recipient or subrecipient and is determined and supported as provided in 2 CFR section 200.430(g), which states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. Condition: Payroll testing was completed for a sample of 40 individuals for which time and expenses were charged to R&D grants. Within that selection, we noted instances where payroll controls did not function properly in regard to percentage of time allocated to a grant, proper pay code inclusion, fringe benefit calculation and timely and supervisor level review of time sheets. Context: Management was able to isolate the time allocation error to 20 employees for which the time and costs charges to the grants were in excess of actual time allocation. This resulted in $87,831.53 in excess charged to the grants. Additional control deficiencies did not result in significant improper grant expenditures. Cause: A new payroll system was implemented in fiscal 2025. Grant allocation percentages were not accurately established in the payroll system upon conversion. Effect: Time charged to grant efforts by certain individuals exceeded actual time worked. Recommendation: Review controls should be enhanced to ensure grant expenditures accurately reflect payroll costs. Corrective Actions Taken or Planned: Management identified the issue early following implementation of the new payroll system and performed a detailed review to isolate the impacted population. Corrections were made to payroll allocations for the affected employees, and reimbursement adjustments were processed as appropriate. To prevent recurrence, management has implemented the following control enhancements: - Standardized procedures for establishing and validating grant allocation percentages within the payroll system; - Enhanced supervisory review requirements for time reporting and payroll approvals; - Periodic monitoring and reconciliation of payroll charges to grant budgets; - Additional training for payroll and grant accounting personnel on system configuration and compliance requirements. Responsible Parties: VP of Accounting and Controller and VP of Audit & Compliance. Anticipated Completion Date: Completed in fiscal year 2025; ongoing monitoring procedures are in place.
Finding 1218940 (2025-003)
Material Weakness 2025
Finding Number: 2025-003 Finding Title: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Reporting Program: 93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E, 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ryan DuMond, Supervisor, Accounting Correctiv...
Finding Number: 2025-003 Finding Title: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Reporting Program: 93.658 Foster Care Title IV-E, 93.778 Grants to States for Medicaid Name of Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action: Ryan DuMond, Supervisor, Accounting Corrective Action Planned: Staff will conduct thorough reviews of all Quarterly Fiscal Memos and attachments issued by DHS to ensure that reporting requirements are fully understood and applied consistently. The County will also develop and document a comprehensive procedure for preparing the DHS‑2550 and DHS‑2556 reports, including detailed instructions for entering adjustments, processing reversing entries, reporting amortization, properly coding capital purchases, and handling MAXIS‑related costs. A mandatory review process will be implemented before submission of each report to verify accuracy and compliance with DHS guidance. As part of this review, staff will closely examine expense classifications to ensure that capital outlay expenditures are accurately coded and reported, and that all required amortization expenses are correctly included. These actions will help prevent misclassification and report errors in future submissions. Anticipated Completion Date: July 2026
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-005 and agrees that the deficiency in accounting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement constitutes a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Misclassification of individual expense ca...
Management Response: Management acknowledges Finding 2025-005 and agrees that the deficiency in accounting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement constitutes a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Misclassification of individual expense categories by $70,223 affected the accuracy of category-level reporting and increased the risk of budget overages or noncompliance where federal awards and resource sharing agreements contain line-item spending limitations or require accurate reporting by cost category. Although the error did not necessarily affect total expenditures, incorrect classification can impair oversight, distort budget-to-actual monitoring, and reduce the reliability of information used for internal and external reporting. Management determined that the root causes included insufficiently detailed written guidance for coding transactions under the resource sharing agreement, inconsistent use of account mappings between the general ledger and agreement budget categories, and inadequate review of category-level coding before expenditures were finalized and reported. Existing procedures addressed expense processing generally, but they did not provide enough direction on how shared-service or agreement-covered costs should be classified into the proper expense categories for budget monitoring and reporting. To address this material weakness, management is implementing a corrective action plan focused on improving category-level classification and reporting for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement. The plan includes four key actions: revising written accounting procedures to define category descriptions, coding rules, and decision standards; creating a standardized crosswalk between general ledger accounts and agreement budget categories; requiring supervisory review of category coding before final reporting; and implementing periodic budget-to-actual monitoring to identify unusual balances, potential overages, and coding trends that may indicate misclassification. Under the revised process, each expense charged under the resource sharing agreement will be recorded using the approved chart-of-accounts mapping and supported by documentation sufficient to identify the nature of the cost, the applicable budget category, and the reason the selected classification is appropriate. If a transaction involves a cost type that does not clearly align to an established category, accounting personnel will be required to elevate the transaction for review before posting or reporting. Any manual reclassification entries affecting agreement categories will require documented justification and supervisory approval. In addition, management will compare recorded expenditures to budgeted amounts by category on a recurring basis so that unusual fluctuations, coding anomalies, or category overages can be investigated and corrected before financial or grant reporting is finalized. Management will also provide targeted training to accounting, finance, and grants personnel responsible for recording or reviewing resource sharing agreement activity. Training will address the relationship between GAAP-based accounting records, agreement-specific budget categories, and federal compliance expectations for accurate, current, and complete financial reporting and comparison of expenditures to budget amounts. Management will supplement this training with periodic reviews of classification trends and exception items so that recurring coding issues can be identified and corrected through additional guidance, process changes, or retraining as needed. Management believes these corrective actions directly address the auditors’ recommendation to review current policies and procedures for compliance with GAAP and federal regulations. Responsibility for implementation will rest primarily with the Finance Director, in coordination with accounting and grants personnel involved in resource sharing agreement reporting. Management expects the enhanced coding guidance, account crosswalk, review controls, and category-level monitoring procedures to improve the accuracy of expense classification, strengthen budget oversight, and reduce the risk of misstatements or noncompliance related to resource sharing agreement expenditures in future periods. Corrective Action Plan Summary Corrective Action Responsible Staff/Role Target Completion Date Evidence of Completion Revise and adopt written accounting procedures for expenses covered under the resource sharing agreement, including category definitions, coding rules, and documentation standards for classification decisions. Finance Director; Accounting Manager June 30, 2026 Approved procedures; updated accounting manual; staff distribution records. Develop and implement a standardized crosswalk between general ledger accounts and resource sharing agreement budget categories, including guidance for common transaction types and reclassification scenarios. Accounting Manager; Finance Director July 15, 2026 Approved account crosswalk; coding reference guide; sample mapped transactions. Require documented supervisory review of category coding for resource sharing agreement transactions before final reporting, including review of manual reclasses and higher-risk expense categories. Finance Director Effective immediately Reviewer signoff on category reports; approved reclassification support; supervisory review documentation. Provide targeted training to accounting, finance, and grants personnel on category-level expense classification, use of the crosswalk, and reporting requirements under the resource sharing agreement Compliance Officer; Finance Director August 31, 2026 Training materials; attendance logs; completed acknowledgements or knowledge checks. and applicable federal regulations. Perform monthly budget-to-actual category reviews for resource sharing agreement expenditures to identify unusual balances, potential overages, and coding anomalies requiring investigation or correction. Accounting Manager; Finance Director Monthly, beginning July 31, 2026 Monthly budget-to-actual reports; exception logs; documented follow-up and corrections. Perform quarterly monitoring of a sample of resource sharing agreement transactions to verify correct category coding, consistency with the approved crosswalk, and compliance with agreement and federal reporting requirements. Compliance Officer; Finance Director Quarterly, beginning September 30, 2026 Quarterly monitoring reports; sample testing documentation; corrective action follow-up records
« 1 29 30 32 33 449 »