Audit 9830

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$21.52M
Findings
4
Programs
6
Organization: Second Harvest Heartland (MN)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-01-05

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
7529 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B
7530 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - E
583971 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B
583972 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
FBFXHRX4FNJ6 Dan Fuhrman Auditee
6512097901 Wendy Harden Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A‐122, Cost Principles for Non‐Profit Organizations, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Organization has elected to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the 10% de minimis cost rate The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the Organization under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Summary of significant accounting policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A‐122, Cost Principles for Non‐Profit Organizations, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Organization has elected to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the 10% de minimis cost rate Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A‐122, Cost Principles for Non‐Profit Organizations, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Organization has elected to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 10.565—Commodity Supplemental Food Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-Through Entities and Award Numbers: Minnesota Department of Health, award number 204642. Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs. Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 of Subpart D, "Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management," of the Uniform Guidance requires a nonfederal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs and Cost Principles. Condition: Controls were not operating to ensure that CSFP box sign out signatures were properly reviewed and tracked against reported totals. Cause: One monthly signature log for a CSFP distribution site had fewer signatures on their box sign out sheet than were reported on the signature log cover sheet. These should never be different, as the log cover sheet should be a representation of the number of signatures in the sign out sheet. The site representative responsible for ensuring these amounts agree did not perform the designed control. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable costs or activities could be charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: None Context: The number of boxes distributed reported on the summary signature log did not agree to the supporting signature detail. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend a separate review of signature log cover sheets be documented by an agent independent of the distribution site. Views of Responsible Officials: Agree and controls have been implemented.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 10.565—Commodity Supplemental Food Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-Through Entities and Award Numbers: Minnesota Department of Health, award number 204642. Compliance Requirement: Eligibility. Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 of Subpart D, "Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management," of the Uniform Guidance requires a nonfederal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including Eligibility. Condition: Controls were not operating effectively over CSFP eligibility. Cause: Some signed enrollment forms for CSFP participants detailing eligibility status were not available upon request. The signatures present on these forms indicate the performance of the review control being performed by Second Harvest Heartland personnel. They should confirm all the information included on the form to be correct. Effect or Potential Effect: An ineligible individual could receive a CSFP box. Questioned Costs: None Context: Signed enrollment forms were not available for two of forty participants selected. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that Second Harvest Heartland digitalize their CSFP enrollment forms for convenient access and so that every form is reviewed for signatures during their upload. Views of Responsible Officials: Agree.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 10.565—Commodity Supplemental Food Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-Through Entities and Award Numbers: Minnesota Department of Health, award number 204642. Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs. Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 of Subpart D, "Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management," of the Uniform Guidance requires a nonfederal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs and Cost Principles. Condition: Controls were not operating to ensure that CSFP box sign out signatures were properly reviewed and tracked against reported totals. Cause: One monthly signature log for a CSFP distribution site had fewer signatures on their box sign out sheet than were reported on the signature log cover sheet. These should never be different, as the log cover sheet should be a representation of the number of signatures in the sign out sheet. The site representative responsible for ensuring these amounts agree did not perform the designed control. Effect or Potential Effect: Unallowable costs or activities could be charged to the grant. Questioned Costs: None Context: The number of boxes distributed reported on the summary signature log did not agree to the supporting signature detail. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend a separate review of signature log cover sheets be documented by an agent independent of the distribution site. Views of Responsible Officials: Agree and controls have been implemented.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 10.565—Commodity Supplemental Food Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Pass-Through Entities and Award Numbers: Minnesota Department of Health, award number 204642. Compliance Requirement: Eligibility. Type of Finding: Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance. Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303 of Subpart D, "Post Federal Award Requirements Standards for Financial and Program Management," of the Uniform Guidance requires a nonfederal entity to establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award, including Eligibility. Condition: Controls were not operating effectively over CSFP eligibility. Cause: Some signed enrollment forms for CSFP participants detailing eligibility status were not available upon request. The signatures present on these forms indicate the performance of the review control being performed by Second Harvest Heartland personnel. They should confirm all the information included on the form to be correct. Effect or Potential Effect: An ineligible individual could receive a CSFP box. Questioned Costs: None Context: Signed enrollment forms were not available for two of forty participants selected. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that Second Harvest Heartland digitalize their CSFP enrollment forms for convenient access and so that every form is reviewed for signatures during their upload. Views of Responsible Officials: Agree.