Audit 79896

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.84M
Findings
2
Programs
7
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
90899 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
667341 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $904,493 Yes 1
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $463,018 Yes 0
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $226,455 - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $156,811 - 0
14.871 Covid-19 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $40,844 Yes 0
14.850 Covid-19 - Public and Indian Housing $27,561 Yes 0
14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids $24,516 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NL3LMU7QJTU6 Mitchell B. Fahrer Auditee
3463491080 Dale R. Rector Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Authority.
Title: SUBRECIPIENTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Authority provided no federal awards to subrecipients during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.
Title: DISCLOSURE OF OTHER FORMS OF ASSISTANCE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. ?The New Reidsville Housing Authority received no federal awards of non-monetary assistance that are required to be disclosed for the year ended June 30, 2022.?The New Reidsville Housing Authority had no loans, loan guarantees, or federally restricted endowment funds required to be disclosed for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022.?The New Reidsville Housing Authority maintained the following limits of insurance as of June 30, 2022:Property$50,000,000General Liability$ 5,000,000Commercial Auto$ 5,000,000Worker CompensationStatutoryPublic Officials Legal Liability$ 5,000,000Individual Public Official Bond$ 50,000Settled claims have not exceeded the above commercial insurance coverage limits over the past three years.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 ? Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files ? Eligibility ? Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency ? Housing Choice Voucher Program ? CFDA #14.871 Condition & cause: Our review of ten (10) Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files revealed the following discrepancies: ? There were two (2) files in which the tenant?s income was not properly calculated. ? There were four (4) files in which the HCV Specialist failed to gather proper signatures on the required release of information and recertification forms. Criteria: The Code of Federal regulations, the Housing Authority Administrative Plan and specific HUD guidelines in documenting and maintaining Housing Choice Voucher tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency conduct a thorough tenant file audit of existing tenants to determine whether there are any misstatements. We also recommend that the Agency determine the best way to monitor compliance with local and federal regulations as it pertains to the upkeep of the tenant files. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Was sampling statistically valid? Yes
Finding 2022-001 ? Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files ? Eligibility ? Noncompliance & Significant Deficiency ? Housing Choice Voucher Program ? CFDA #14.871 Condition & cause: Our review of ten (10) Housing Choice Voucher Tenant Files revealed the following discrepancies: ? There were two (2) files in which the tenant?s income was not properly calculated. ? There were four (4) files in which the HCV Specialist failed to gather proper signatures on the required release of information and recertification forms. Criteria: The Code of Federal regulations, the Housing Authority Administrative Plan and specific HUD guidelines in documenting and maintaining Housing Choice Voucher tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency conduct a thorough tenant file audit of existing tenants to determine whether there are any misstatements. We also recommend that the Agency determine the best way to monitor compliance with local and federal regulations as it pertains to the upkeep of the tenant files. Questioned Costs: None Repeat Finding: No Was sampling statistically valid? Yes