Audit 73870

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$52.95M
Findings
4
Programs
15
Organization: Molloy College (NY)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
64467 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
64468 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
640909 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
640910 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
PCUKYDN6M118 Kathy Hegdahl Auditee
5163233038 Edward Miller Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: The information presented on this schedule has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting and is presented in accordance with the provisions of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The University used the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance for the Education and Human Resources program (CFDA number 47.076). The University is responsible only for the performance of certain ongoing administrative duties with respect to the Federal Direct Loan Program (Federal Stafford and PLUS loans). Accordingly, the outstanding loan balances under this program are not included in the Universitys basic financial statements. It is not practical to determine the balance of loans outstanding to students of the University under this program at June 30, 2022. In addition, the value of outstanding Federal Perkins Loan Program and Federal Nursing Faculty Loan Program balances at June 30, 2022 totaled $1,028,121 and $795,208, respectively.
Title: STUDENT LOAN PROGRAMS Accounting Policies: The information presented on this schedule has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting and is presented in accordance with the provisions of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The University used the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance for the Education and Human Resources program (CFDA number 47.076). The federal student loan program listed below is administered directly by the University, and balances and transactions relating to this program are included in the Universitys financial statements. Loan activities and balances consist of the following: Perkins Loan Program- Federal Assistance Listing Number 84.038, Balance as of July 1, 2021 - $1,699,101, Loans Issued - $0, Payments Received - ($670,980), Balance as of June 30, 2022 - $1,028,121. Federal Nursing Faculty Loan - Assistance Listing Number 93.264, Balance as of July 1, 2021 - $736,174, Loans Issued - $170,731, Payments Received - ($111,697), Balance as of June 30, 2022 - $795,208.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) U.S. Department of Education - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Direct Student Loans (CFDA #84.268) Federal Award Number: P268K201866 Federal Pell Grant Program (CFDA #84.063) Federal Award Number: P063P191866 Federal Award Year: 2021-2022 Criteria: Under the Federal Pell Grant Program and U.S. Department of Education (?ED?) loan programs, institutions are required to report student enrollment information via the National Student Loan Data System (?NSLDS?) (OMB No. 1845-0035). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access website. The data on the institution?s Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS maintains as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information; ?Campus Level? and ?Program Level,? both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Required program-level data includes, but is not limited to: * Program enrollment status; *Program enrollment effective date; *Program begin date; *Published program length and measurement; and, * Classification of Instructional Program (?CIP?) code. Context and Condition: From a selection of forty (40) students tested, we identified the following instances of noncompliance: 1) For all forty (40) students, the certification date in the campus-level record data was not submitted to the NSLDS. 2) For seven (7) students, the status recorded within NSLDS was reported incorrectly per the student records and internal documentation provided by the University. Cause: The Department of Education requested that the University correct all errors noted during the prior year audit during the current year. Management went through a process to identify errors, maintain contemporaneous document required changes necessary to NSLDS records, and attempt to update the information in the NSLDS records. Management has indicated that due to errors experienced within the NSLDS system, the University was not able to access the system to accurately report this information during the year or correct information relating to prior years. Effect: Certification dates for all forty (40) students and the enrollment status for seven (7) students were not properly reported to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The University should continue to work with the NSLDS to identify a way to report the required changes in the NSLDS system so that the information included within the University?s systems is accurately reflected at NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: As soon as the suspension of the NSLDS Enrollment History Update functionality is lifted, Molloy will make the necessary updates. Molloy will run a separate report the day each enrollment submission is created to capture any student who withdraws the date the submission is run.
Finding 2022-001 Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) U.S. Department of Education - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Direct Student Loans (CFDA #84.268) Federal Award Number: P268K201866 Federal Pell Grant Program (CFDA #84.063) Federal Award Number: P063P191866 Federal Award Year: 2021-2022 Criteria: Under the Federal Pell Grant Program and U.S. Department of Education (?ED?) loan programs, institutions are required to report student enrollment information via the National Student Loan Data System (?NSLDS?) (OMB No. 1845-0035). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access website. The data on the institution?s Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS maintains as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information; ?Campus Level? and ?Program Level,? both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Required program-level data includes, but is not limited to: * Program enrollment status; *Program enrollment effective date; *Program begin date; *Published program length and measurement; and, * Classification of Instructional Program (?CIP?) code. Context and Condition: From a selection of forty (40) students tested, we identified the following instances of noncompliance: 1) For all forty (40) students, the certification date in the campus-level record data was not submitted to the NSLDS. 2) For seven (7) students, the status recorded within NSLDS was reported incorrectly per the student records and internal documentation provided by the University. Cause: The Department of Education requested that the University correct all errors noted during the prior year audit during the current year. Management went through a process to identify errors, maintain contemporaneous document required changes necessary to NSLDS records, and attempt to update the information in the NSLDS records. Management has indicated that due to errors experienced within the NSLDS system, the University was not able to access the system to accurately report this information during the year or correct information relating to prior years. Effect: Certification dates for all forty (40) students and the enrollment status for seven (7) students were not properly reported to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The University should continue to work with the NSLDS to identify a way to report the required changes in the NSLDS system so that the information included within the University?s systems is accurately reflected at NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: As soon as the suspension of the NSLDS Enrollment History Update functionality is lifted, Molloy will make the necessary updates. Molloy will run a separate report the day each enrollment submission is created to capture any student who withdraws the date the submission is run.
Finding 2022-001 Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) U.S. Department of Education - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Direct Student Loans (CFDA #84.268) Federal Award Number: P268K201866 Federal Pell Grant Program (CFDA #84.063) Federal Award Number: P063P191866 Federal Award Year: 2021-2022 Criteria: Under the Federal Pell Grant Program and U.S. Department of Education (?ED?) loan programs, institutions are required to report student enrollment information via the National Student Loan Data System (?NSLDS?) (OMB No. 1845-0035). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access website. The data on the institution?s Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS maintains as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information; ?Campus Level? and ?Program Level,? both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Required program-level data includes, but is not limited to: * Program enrollment status; *Program enrollment effective date; *Program begin date; *Published program length and measurement; and, * Classification of Instructional Program (?CIP?) code. Context and Condition: From a selection of forty (40) students tested, we identified the following instances of noncompliance: 1) For all forty (40) students, the certification date in the campus-level record data was not submitted to the NSLDS. 2) For seven (7) students, the status recorded within NSLDS was reported incorrectly per the student records and internal documentation provided by the University. Cause: The Department of Education requested that the University correct all errors noted during the prior year audit during the current year. Management went through a process to identify errors, maintain contemporaneous document required changes necessary to NSLDS records, and attempt to update the information in the NSLDS records. Management has indicated that due to errors experienced within the NSLDS system, the University was not able to access the system to accurately report this information during the year or correct information relating to prior years. Effect: Certification dates for all forty (40) students and the enrollment status for seven (7) students were not properly reported to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The University should continue to work with the NSLDS to identify a way to report the required changes in the NSLDS system so that the information included within the University?s systems is accurately reflected at NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: As soon as the suspension of the NSLDS Enrollment History Update functionality is lifted, Molloy will make the necessary updates. Molloy will run a separate report the day each enrollment submission is created to capture any student who withdraws the date the submission is run.
Finding 2022-001 Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting Compliance and Internal Control (Significant Deficiency) U.S. Department of Education - Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Direct Student Loans (CFDA #84.268) Federal Award Number: P268K201866 Federal Pell Grant Program (CFDA #84.063) Federal Award Number: P063P191866 Federal Award Year: 2021-2022 Criteria: Under the Federal Pell Grant Program and U.S. Department of Education (?ED?) loan programs, institutions are required to report student enrollment information via the National Student Loan Data System (?NSLDS?) (OMB No. 1845-0035). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and verify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access website. The data on the institution?s Enrollment Reporting Roster, or Enrollment Maintenance page, is what NSLDS maintains as the most recently certified enrollment information. There are two categories of enrollment information; ?Campus Level? and ?Program Level,? both of which need to be reported accurately and have separate record types. The NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Guide provides the requirements and guidance for reporting enrollment details using the NSLDS Enrollment Reporting Process. Required program-level data includes, but is not limited to: * Program enrollment status; *Program enrollment effective date; *Program begin date; *Published program length and measurement; and, * Classification of Instructional Program (?CIP?) code. Context and Condition: From a selection of forty (40) students tested, we identified the following instances of noncompliance: 1) For all forty (40) students, the certification date in the campus-level record data was not submitted to the NSLDS. 2) For seven (7) students, the status recorded within NSLDS was reported incorrectly per the student records and internal documentation provided by the University. Cause: The Department of Education requested that the University correct all errors noted during the prior year audit during the current year. Management went through a process to identify errors, maintain contemporaneous document required changes necessary to NSLDS records, and attempt to update the information in the NSLDS records. Management has indicated that due to errors experienced within the NSLDS system, the University was not able to access the system to accurately report this information during the year or correct information relating to prior years. Effect: Certification dates for all forty (40) students and the enrollment status for seven (7) students were not properly reported to the NSLDS. Questioned Costs: None identified. Identified as a Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The University should continue to work with the NSLDS to identify a way to report the required changes in the NSLDS system so that the information included within the University?s systems is accurately reflected at NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: As soon as the suspension of the NSLDS Enrollment History Update functionality is lifted, Molloy will make the necessary updates. Molloy will run a separate report the day each enrollment submission is created to capture any student who withdraws the date the submission is run.