Audit 6375

FY End
2023-08-31
Total Expended
$5.01M
Findings
16
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
4059 2023-001 - - E
4060 2023-002 - - E
4061 2023-001 - - E
4062 2023-002 - - E
4063 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - P
4064 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - P
4065 2023-004 Significant Deficiency - B
4066 2023-004 Significant Deficiency - B
580501 2023-001 - - E
580502 2023-002 - - E
580503 2023-001 - - E
580504 2023-002 - - E
580505 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - P
580506 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - P
580507 2023-004 Significant Deficiency - B
580508 2023-004 Significant Deficiency - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $4.82M Yes 4

Contacts

Name Title Type
LM1NSFRJY9G7 Jill Lesmerises Auditee
6032253295 Shauna Brown Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE C: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: NOTE A: BASIS OF PRESENTATION: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Pembroke Housing for the Elderly, Inc., HUD Project No. 024-EE102-WAH, and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Pembroke Housing for the Elderly, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Pembroke Housing for the Elderly, Inc. NOTE B: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Pembroke Housing for the Elderly, Inc. has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. NOTE C: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT LOAN PROGRAM: Pembroke Housing for the Elderly, Inc. has received a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development capital advance under Section 202 of the National Housing Act. The loan balance outstanding at the beginning of the year is included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. Pembroke Housing for the Elderly, Inc. received no additional loans during the year. The balance of the loan outstanding at August 31, 2023 consists of: 14.157 Section 202 Capital Advance $4,815,848

Finding Details

Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Missing required documentation. Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) reports were not able to be run, due to the license expiring and the person with the license was no longer working there. Criteria: HUD requires EIV forms to be run, monthly, quarterly and annually. Effect: Required documents were not in the files. Context: Auditor reviewed tenant files noting the form was not present in the tenant files. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. The one individual with the EIV license was no longer working at the Organization. Recommendation: A system should be in place requiring more than one individual to have an EIV license and ensure the license does not lapse.
Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Several tenants were not recertified in accordance with HUD guidelines. Criteria: All tenants must be recertified annually. Tenants must provide all income information at recertification. Effect: HUD subsidy may be overstated. Context: Auditor selected tenant files and discussed with the management agent that due to understaffing, there were difficulties in obtaining the appropriate documentation and therefore completing accurate 50059 forms. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: Continue to hire and train additional staff to fill the staffing shortages.
Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Missing required documentation. Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) reports were not able to be run, due to the license expiring and the person with the license was no longer working there. Criteria: HUD requires EIV forms to be run, monthly, quarterly and annually. Effect: Required documents were not in the files. Context: Auditor reviewed tenant files noting the form was not present in the tenant files. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. The one individual with the EIV license was no longer working at the Organization. Recommendation: A system should be in place requiring more than one individual to have an EIV license and ensure the license does not lapse.
Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Several tenants were not recertified in accordance with HUD guidelines. Criteria: All tenants must be recertified annually. Tenants must provide all income information at recertification. Effect: HUD subsidy may be overstated. Context: Auditor selected tenant files and discussed with the management agent that due to understaffing, there were difficulties in obtaining the appropriate documentation and therefore completing accurate 50059 forms. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: Continue to hire and train additional staff to fill the staffing shortages.
Information on universe/sample size: It was noted during testing that some of the HUD form certifiers were not updated in a timely manner. Condition: HUD forms must be certified by an authorized user. Criteria: The certifier for HUD forms should be a current employee with oversight in the area the form pertains to. Effect: The forms were not certified by the correct individual. Context: Auditor reviewed source documents noting incorrect certifier. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: A procedure be implemented to ensure that the Project timely changes the certifier on forms when applicable.
Information on universe/sample size: It was noted during testing that some of the HUD form certifiers were not updated in a timely manner. Condition: HUD forms must be certified by an authorized user. Criteria: The certifier for HUD forms should be a current employee with oversight in the area the form pertains to. Effect: The forms were not certified by the correct individual. Context: Auditor reviewed source documents noting incorrect certifier. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: A procedure be implemented to ensure that the Project timely changes the certifier on forms when applicable.
Information on universe: Internal Control testing Sample size: Six employees selected for internal control testing. Condition: Additional detail, documentation and approval/oversight is needed on some of time sheets for allocation to projects. Criteria: All allocable time should have sufficient detail of duties performed and approvals. Effect: Without stronger controls around allocations, improper allocation could occur. Context: Auditor selected timesheets for payroll control testing. Cause: Lack of policy surrounding time reporting. Recommendation: Job duties should be documented for each position and implement a policy to ensure all time sheets detail out the duties performed.
Information on universe: Internal Control testing Sample size: Six employees selected for internal control testing. Condition: Additional detail, documentation and approval/oversight is needed on some of time sheets for allocation to projects. Criteria: All allocable time should have sufficient detail of duties performed and approvals. Effect: Without stronger controls around allocations, improper allocation could occur. Context: Auditor selected timesheets for payroll control testing. Cause: Lack of policy surrounding time reporting. Recommendation: Job duties should be documented for each position and implement a policy to ensure all time sheets detail out the duties performed.
Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Missing required documentation. Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) reports were not able to be run, due to the license expiring and the person with the license was no longer working there. Criteria: HUD requires EIV forms to be run, monthly, quarterly and annually. Effect: Required documents were not in the files. Context: Auditor reviewed tenant files noting the form was not present in the tenant files. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. The one individual with the EIV license was no longer working at the Organization. Recommendation: A system should be in place requiring more than one individual to have an EIV license and ensure the license does not lapse.
Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Several tenants were not recertified in accordance with HUD guidelines. Criteria: All tenants must be recertified annually. Tenants must provide all income information at recertification. Effect: HUD subsidy may be overstated. Context: Auditor selected tenant files and discussed with the management agent that due to understaffing, there were difficulties in obtaining the appropriate documentation and therefore completing accurate 50059 forms. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: Continue to hire and train additional staff to fill the staffing shortages.
Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Missing required documentation. Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) reports were not able to be run, due to the license expiring and the person with the license was no longer working there. Criteria: HUD requires EIV forms to be run, monthly, quarterly and annually. Effect: Required documents were not in the files. Context: Auditor reviewed tenant files noting the form was not present in the tenant files. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. The one individual with the EIV license was no longer working at the Organization. Recommendation: A system should be in place requiring more than one individual to have an EIV license and ensure the license does not lapse.
Information on universe: Total population was 45 units. Sample Size: 5 files were selected for testing. Condition: Several tenants were not recertified in accordance with HUD guidelines. Criteria: All tenants must be recertified annually. Tenants must provide all income information at recertification. Effect: HUD subsidy may be overstated. Context: Auditor selected tenant files and discussed with the management agent that due to understaffing, there were difficulties in obtaining the appropriate documentation and therefore completing accurate 50059 forms. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: Continue to hire and train additional staff to fill the staffing shortages.
Information on universe/sample size: It was noted during testing that some of the HUD form certifiers were not updated in a timely manner. Condition: HUD forms must be certified by an authorized user. Criteria: The certifier for HUD forms should be a current employee with oversight in the area the form pertains to. Effect: The forms were not certified by the correct individual. Context: Auditor reviewed source documents noting incorrect certifier. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: A procedure be implemented to ensure that the Project timely changes the certifier on forms when applicable.
Information on universe/sample size: It was noted during testing that some of the HUD form certifiers were not updated in a timely manner. Condition: HUD forms must be certified by an authorized user. Criteria: The certifier for HUD forms should be a current employee with oversight in the area the form pertains to. Effect: The forms were not certified by the correct individual. Context: Auditor reviewed source documents noting incorrect certifier. Cause: Lack of oversight by management agent. Recommendation: A procedure be implemented to ensure that the Project timely changes the certifier on forms when applicable.
Information on universe: Internal Control testing Sample size: Six employees selected for internal control testing. Condition: Additional detail, documentation and approval/oversight is needed on some of time sheets for allocation to projects. Criteria: All allocable time should have sufficient detail of duties performed and approvals. Effect: Without stronger controls around allocations, improper allocation could occur. Context: Auditor selected timesheets for payroll control testing. Cause: Lack of policy surrounding time reporting. Recommendation: Job duties should be documented for each position and implement a policy to ensure all time sheets detail out the duties performed.
Information on universe: Internal Control testing Sample size: Six employees selected for internal control testing. Condition: Additional detail, documentation and approval/oversight is needed on some of time sheets for allocation to projects. Criteria: All allocable time should have sufficient detail of duties performed and approvals. Effect: Without stronger controls around allocations, improper allocation could occur. Context: Auditor selected timesheets for payroll control testing. Cause: Lack of policy surrounding time reporting. Recommendation: Job duties should be documented for each position and implement a policy to ensure all time sheets detail out the duties performed.