Audit 6305

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$67.42M
Findings
4
Programs
11
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-12-12
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
3998 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - ABE
3999 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - ABE
580440 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - ABE
580441 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - ABE

Contacts

Name Title Type
NQW1BHKPK8U3 Todd Hight Auditee
6057735665 Tara Engquist Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note A – Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Note B - Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on the cash basis. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note C – Indirect Cost Rate The Authority has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Authority under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Authority it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Authority.

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Treasury CFDA # 21.023, 2021 Award Year, Award Number: Not Provided COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERA) Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Criteria: Financial assistance to households includes payment of rent, rental arrears, utilities and energy costs, utility and energy costs in arrears, and other expenses related to housing pursuant to 15 USC 9058a(c)(2)(A). Condition: One homebuyer payment was allocated to ERA instead of the Homeownership Assistance Fund (HAF). Cause: An error was made by accounting in allocating the award to the ERA program. Effect: Payment was made to an individual that was not eligible under the ERA program. Questioned Costs: None reported as less than $25,000. Context/Sampling: We tested 43 of the 212 SDHDA-awarded payments and the total payments made by SDHDA directly to tenants was $332,487. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend a high-level review occur for allocation of awards to ensure that awards are allocated to the proper program. We also recommend that the error noted above be corrected and allocated to the proper program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Treasury CFDA # 21.023, 2021 Award Year, Award Number: Not Provided COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERA) Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Criteria: Financial assistance to households includes payment of rent, rental arrears, utilities and energy costs, utility and energy costs in arrears, and other expenses related to housing pursuant to 15 USC 9058a(c)(2)(A). Condition: One homebuyer payment was allocated to ERA instead of the Homeownership Assistance Fund (HAF). Cause: An error was made by accounting in allocating the award to the ERA program. Effect: Payment was made to an individual that was not eligible under the ERA program. Questioned Costs: None reported as less than $25,000. Context/Sampling: We tested 43 of the 212 SDHDA-awarded payments and the total payments made by SDHDA directly to tenants was $332,487. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend a high-level review occur for allocation of awards to ensure that awards are allocated to the proper program. We also recommend that the error noted above be corrected and allocated to the proper program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Treasury CFDA # 21.023, 2021 Award Year, Award Number: Not Provided COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERA) Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Criteria: Financial assistance to households includes payment of rent, rental arrears, utilities and energy costs, utility and energy costs in arrears, and other expenses related to housing pursuant to 15 USC 9058a(c)(2)(A). Condition: One homebuyer payment was allocated to ERA instead of the Homeownership Assistance Fund (HAF). Cause: An error was made by accounting in allocating the award to the ERA program. Effect: Payment was made to an individual that was not eligible under the ERA program. Questioned Costs: None reported as less than $25,000. Context/Sampling: We tested 43 of the 212 SDHDA-awarded payments and the total payments made by SDHDA directly to tenants was $332,487. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend a high-level review occur for allocation of awards to ensure that awards are allocated to the proper program. We also recommend that the error noted above be corrected and allocated to the proper program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
U.S. Department of Treasury CFDA # 21.023, 2021 Award Year, Award Number: Not Provided COVID-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERA) Activities Allowed, Allowable Costs, and Eligibility Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Criteria: Financial assistance to households includes payment of rent, rental arrears, utilities and energy costs, utility and energy costs in arrears, and other expenses related to housing pursuant to 15 USC 9058a(c)(2)(A). Condition: One homebuyer payment was allocated to ERA instead of the Homeownership Assistance Fund (HAF). Cause: An error was made by accounting in allocating the award to the ERA program. Effect: Payment was made to an individual that was not eligible under the ERA program. Questioned Costs: None reported as less than $25,000. Context/Sampling: We tested 43 of the 212 SDHDA-awarded payments and the total payments made by SDHDA directly to tenants was $332,487. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): No Recommendation: We recommend a high-level review occur for allocation of awards to ensure that awards are allocated to the proper program. We also recommend that the error noted above be corrected and allocated to the proper program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.