FAC Explorer

Audit 54294

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$3.00M
Findings
2
Programs
16
Organization: Catholic Charities, INC (KS)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-12-12
Auditor: Swindoll Janzen Hawk & Loyd

Organization Exclusion Status:

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
59048 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - P
635490 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $624,216 Yes 1
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $370,372 - 0
94.011 Foster Grandparent Program $344,321 - 0
93.498 Provider Relief Fund $206,998 Yes 0
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $133,604 - 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $100,957 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $99,949 - 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $81,720 - 0
16.736 Transitional Housing Assistance for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Stalking, Or Sexual Assault $77,237 - 0
16.588 Violence Against Women Formula Grants $48,146 - 0
93.671 Family Violence Prevention and Services/domestic Violence Shelter and Supportive Services $47,155 - 0
93.569 Community Services Block Grant $25,700 Yes 0
97.024 Emergency Food and Shelter National Board Program $7,873 - 0
94.006 Americorps $3,855 - 0
64.033 Va Supportive Services for Veteran Families Program $1,800 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1,270 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
M6PDUJNMCEN5 William Wallisch Auditee
3162020625 Debbie Coan Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the accompanying SEFA schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate of 48.6% when allowed.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001
Condition: Two of twelve client assistance transactions selected for testing did not include a properly completed SAFE Program Client Agreement form as requested by the DCF (grantor). Criteria: Effective April of 2022, the grantor, DCF, required the completion of a SAFE Program Client Agreement form for every client receiving financial aid through the program ass evidence of eligibility for the program. Questioned Costs: None were noted. Context: One client assistance transaction did not include the SAFE Program Client Agreement form on file and one client assistance transaction did not include a Program Director's signature on the SAFE Program Client agreement form as evidence of supervisor review. The SAFE Program Client Agreement was a new process requested by DCF and put in place effective April of 2022. As such, the process was in place for only three months of the fiscal year. Effect: Failure to properly document client eligibility for client assistance per grantor process could result in improper approval of client assistance and lack of documentation to demonstrate compliance with eligibility requirements of the grant. Recommendation: Ensure proper training of relevant personnel when implementing new controls over compliance or changes to existing controls.
Finding 2022-001
Condition: Two of twelve client assistance transactions selected for testing did not include a properly completed SAFE Program Client Agreement form as requested by the DCF (grantor). Criteria: Effective April of 2022, the grantor, DCF, required the completion of a SAFE Program Client Agreement form for every client receiving financial aid through the program ass evidence of eligibility for the program. Questioned Costs: None were noted. Context: One client assistance transaction did not include the SAFE Program Client Agreement form on file and one client assistance transaction did not include a Program Director's signature on the SAFE Program Client agreement form as evidence of supervisor review. The SAFE Program Client Agreement was a new process requested by DCF and put in place effective April of 2022. As such, the process was in place for only three months of the fiscal year. Effect: Failure to properly document client eligibility for client assistance per grantor process could result in improper approval of client assistance and lack of documentation to demonstrate compliance with eligibility requirements of the grant. Recommendation: Ensure proper training of relevant personnel when implementing new controls over compliance or changes to existing controls.