Audit 53673

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$862,616
Findings
4
Programs
1
Organization: Planned Parenthood South Texas (TX)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-18
Auditor: Rsm US LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
47448 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - ABL
47449 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - AB
623890 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - ABL
623891 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.217 Family Planning_services $362,616 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
NSBSL6BC3BT5 Magda Mijares Auditee
2107362244 Kyle Stewart Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Planned Parenthood of South Texas and Subsidiaries (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2022.003? Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Reporting United States Department of Health and Human Services Family Planning Services Assistance Listing No.93.217 Federal Award Number: FPHPA006499 Federal Award Year: 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, the Organization must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its federal programs. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Organization requested reimbursements of $50,000 and determined the reasonableness of the amount being requested on a per patient basis rather than requesting funds based on actual expenditures incurred. Due to this, the expenditures were not reviewed for compliance with grant requirements. Cause: Control procedures did not function as designed and expenditures were not reviewed for compliance with grant requirements. Effect: Failure to review expenditures at a detailed level could result in unallowable costs or expenditures claimed. Questioned costs: None Context: Reimbursement request was not based on actual expenditures incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management enhance controls related to review of expenditures for compliance with allowable costs and activities unallowed requirements to ensure unallowed costs are not charged to the program. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2022.002?Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles United States Department of Health and Human Services Family Planning Services Assistance Listing No.93.217 Federal Award Number: FPHPA006525 Federal Award Year: 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, the Organization must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its federal programs. Condition: As of December 31, 2022, the Organization provided health care services to 2,964 patients, however the reimbursement request was for 3,648 patients. The difference between the expected patients versus actual created an overpayment of federal funds totaling $83,701 at December 31, 2022. Management subsequently returned the funds to the granting agency. Cause: Control procedures did not function as designed and thus unallowable costs were submitted for reimbursement. While unallowable expenditures may have been initially charged to the grant, the Organization planned to return any unallowable costs subsequent to year-end. Effect: Failure to review expenditures at a detailed level could result in unallowable costs or expenditures claimed. Questioned costs: $83,701 Context: Reimbursement request was made using the expected number of patients that would be serviced, however the actual patients served totaled 2,964. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management enhance controls related to review of expenditures for compliance with allowable costs and activities unallowed requirements to ensure unallowed costs are not charged to the program. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2022.003? Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, Reporting United States Department of Health and Human Services Family Planning Services Assistance Listing No.93.217 Federal Award Number: FPHPA006499 Federal Award Year: 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, the Organization must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its federal programs. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Organization requested reimbursements of $50,000 and determined the reasonableness of the amount being requested on a per patient basis rather than requesting funds based on actual expenditures incurred. Due to this, the expenditures were not reviewed for compliance with grant requirements. Cause: Control procedures did not function as designed and expenditures were not reviewed for compliance with grant requirements. Effect: Failure to review expenditures at a detailed level could result in unallowable costs or expenditures claimed. Questioned costs: None Context: Reimbursement request was not based on actual expenditures incurred. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management enhance controls related to review of expenditures for compliance with allowable costs and activities unallowed requirements to ensure unallowed costs are not charged to the program. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding. See corrective action plan.
Finding 2022.002?Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles United States Department of Health and Human Services Family Planning Services Assistance Listing No.93.217 Federal Award Number: FPHPA006525 Federal Award Year: 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, the Organization must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that it is managing federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations and provisions of contracts or grant agreements that could have a material effect on each of its federal programs. Condition: As of December 31, 2022, the Organization provided health care services to 2,964 patients, however the reimbursement request was for 3,648 patients. The difference between the expected patients versus actual created an overpayment of federal funds totaling $83,701 at December 31, 2022. Management subsequently returned the funds to the granting agency. Cause: Control procedures did not function as designed and thus unallowable costs were submitted for reimbursement. While unallowable expenditures may have been initially charged to the grant, the Organization planned to return any unallowable costs subsequent to year-end. Effect: Failure to review expenditures at a detailed level could result in unallowable costs or expenditures claimed. Questioned costs: $83,701 Context: Reimbursement request was made using the expected number of patients that would be serviced, however the actual patients served totaled 2,964. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management enhance controls related to review of expenditures for compliance with allowable costs and activities unallowed requirements to ensure unallowed costs are not charged to the program. View of responsible officials: Management concurs with the finding. See corrective action plan.