Audit 51363

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$927,459
Findings
2
Programs
8
Organization: Alternatives to Violence, Inc. (CO)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
47168 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - P
623610 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - P

Contacts

Name Title Type
CSM9A1F5MVN6 Kari Clark Auditee
9706695150 Abbey Irvine Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: This schedule includes the federal awards activity of Alternatives to Violence, Inc. and is presented on theaccrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirementof the Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amountspresented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

During testing of two out of three transactions requiring procurement, we identified two instances that aggregated to greater than $10,000 and less than $250,000 that had no procurement documentation evidencing procurement procedures were followed. The expense was budgeted and the Organization had not planned to charge the expense to a grant. However, it was later determined to be grant eligible. Documentation of the process to acquire price quotations from multiple vendors was not available. Further, the Organization did not initially perform a search to determine whether the contractor was suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from working on projects funded with Federal dollars. Cause: The finding occurred due to failure to follow the established procurement policy of the Organization. Effect: Failure to follow procurement procedures may result in Alternatives to Violence, Inc. purchasing goods or services for more than would be necessary if required procurement procedures had been followed. Additionally, the Organization could enter into a transaction with a contractor who was suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible
During testing of two out of three transactions requiring procurement, we identified two instances that aggregated to greater than $10,000 and less than $250,000 that had no procurement documentation evidencing procurement procedures were followed. The expense was budgeted and the Organization had not planned to charge the expense to a grant. However, it was later determined to be grant eligible. Documentation of the process to acquire price quotations from multiple vendors was not available. Further, the Organization did not initially perform a search to determine whether the contractor was suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from working on projects funded with Federal dollars. Cause: The finding occurred due to failure to follow the established procurement policy of the Organization. Effect: Failure to follow procurement procedures may result in Alternatives to Violence, Inc. purchasing goods or services for more than would be necessary if required procurement procedures had been followed. Additionally, the Organization could enter into a transaction with a contractor who was suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible