Audit 51195

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$85.92M
Findings
4
Programs
24
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-11-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
47865 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - G
47866 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - G
624307 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - G
624308 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - G

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Covid-19 Education Stabilization Fund (esser Iii) $32.64M Yes 0
84.425 Covid-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (esser Ii) $22.60M Yes 0
10.555 *covid-19 National School Lunch Program-Sso $8.25M - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $7.26M Yes 1
10.553 *covid-19 School Breakfast Program-Sso $3.82M - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $2.23M - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program - Non-Cash Assistance $1.11M - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instructions State Grants $1.10M - 0
93.323 Covid-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (k-12 Covid-19 Testing Program) - Non -Cash Assistance $810,040 Yes 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $598,535 - 0
93.323 Covid-19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (school Health Support Grant) $556,931 Yes 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $538,485 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $489,709 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $321,189 - 0
10.555 Supply Chain Assistance (sca) $305,472 - 0
10.582 Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program $248,201 - 0
84.011 Migrant Education_state Grant Program $170,443 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program-Medicaid Administrative Claiming (mac) $123,084 - 0
12.U01 Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps $106,862 - 0
10.560 State Administrative Expenses for Child Nutrition Programs $54,413 - 0
84.334 Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs $46,332 - 0
84.425 Covid-19 Tclas -Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (esser Ii) $37,034 Yes 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $32,402 - 0
84.369 Summer School - Limited English Prof $21,224 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
CF41ED1ALVQ4 Joel Garcia Auditee
9563235515 Esmeralda Yniguez Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Federally Funded Insurance Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. During the year ended June30, 2022, the District had no federally funded insurance.
Title: Noncash awards Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the District received non-cash assistance of $1,109,520 under the National School Lunch Program. The District also received non-cash assistance of $810,040 under the COVID -19 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases.
Title: Contingencies: Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Grant monies received and disbursed by the district are for specific purposes and are subject to review by the grantor agencies. Such audits may result in requests for reimbursement due to disallowed expenditures. Based upon experiences due to disallowed expenditures. Based upon experience, the District does not believe that such disallowance, if any would have a material effect on the financial position of the District.
Title: Sub-recipients: Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. During the year ended June 30, 2022. the District had no sub-recipients
Title: Federal Loans and Loan Guarantees: Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. During the year ended June30, 2022, the District had no outstanding federal loans payable or loan guarantees.
Title: Federal Pass- through Funds: Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The District is also the sub-recipient of federal funds that have been subjected to testing and are reported as expenditures and listed as federal pass-through funds. federal awards other than those indicated as pass through are considered to be direct.
Title: Reconciliation from the Schedule of Exp. of Federal Awards to Exhibit C-3 Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Total Federal Award Expended $85,917,529 Medical Assistance Program 2,959,418 QSC Subsidy 121,900 P-EBT Admin 5,814 Exhibit C-3 $89,004,661
Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Mission CISD. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. Because this schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Mission CISD, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Mission CISD.

Finding Details

Level of Effort - Maintenance of effort- Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies AL#84.010A Passed through Texas Education Agency 21610101108908 22610101108908 Criteria: Per Texas Education Agency(TEA)guidance on ESEA Section 8521, when the district (LEA) is awarded ESSA Funds, LEA's are required to comply with Level of Effort - Maintenance of Effort(MOE) on which the District must maintain a minimum of 90%of its expenditures for public education from state and local funds from one year to the next. Per 2cfr 200.303, non-federal entities should establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance, such as monitoring expenditures on the state and local funds throughout the year. Condition: Preliminary calculation of the MOE compliance using 2021-2022 fiscal year data to be finalized subsequent to year end, shows that the LEA will not pass four compliance tests to comply with MOE. Cause: District continued to have a decrease in student enrollment and had a significant number of staff change of funding source. District also received alternative sources of revenues that made the district expend more with those other grants causing the noncompliance in MOE. Effect: Per section 8521(b)(1), ESEA, If the LEA fails to meet MOE compliance requirements and if the LEA failed to meet the MOE requirement in one or more of the five immediately preceding fiscal years, the District could receive notification form TEA indicating that a reduction of the amount of funds allocated under ESEA-covered programs in exact proportion to the LEA'S failure to meet the requirements would occur. No noncompliance in MOE has been noted in the five years preceding the fiscal year. Actual effect of noncompliance will be dependent on the District's MOE compliance in the subsequent years. Perspective: Previous five-year annual Moe reports and the report available as of the date of testing based on 2020-2021 fiscal year data shows the District has been and is in compliance with MOE requirements. However, preliminary calculations using 2021-2022 fiscal year data show the District will not comply with MOE requirements when final report become available. Questioned Costs: $0 Auditors' Recommendation: CRI recommends monitoring of enrollment projections and coordinating meetings with human resources and payroll departments to identify timely impact when staff funding changes occur. CRI also recommends quarterly reviews of actual expenditures compared to budget to ensure that MOE tests will be met by the year-end. Management Reponse: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 181.
Level of Effort - Maintenance of effort- Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies AL#84.010A Passed through Texas Education Agency 21610101108908 22610101108908 Criteria: Per Texas Education Agency(TEA)guidance on ESEA Section 8521, when the district (LEA) is awarded ESSA Funds, LEA's are required to comply with Level of Effort - Maintenance of Effort(MOE) on which the District must maintain a minimum of 90%of its expenditures for public education from state and local funds from one year to the next. Per 2cfr 200.303, non-federal entities should establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance, such as monitoring expenditures on the state and local funds throughout the year. Condition: Preliminary calculation of the MOE compliance using 2021-2022 fiscal year data to be finalized subsequent to year end, shows that the LEA will not pass four compliance tests to comply with MOE. Cause: District continued to have a decrease in student enrollment and had a significant number of staff change of funding source. District also received alternative sources of revenues that made the district expend more with those other grants causing the noncompliance in MOE. Effect: Per section 8521(b)(1), ESEA, If the LEA fails to meet MOE compliance requirements and if the LEA failed to meet the MOE requirement in one or more of the five immediately preceding fiscal years, the District could receive notification form TEA indicating that a reduction of the amount of funds allocated under ESEA-covered programs in exact proportion to the LEA'S failure to meet the requirements would occur. No noncompliance in MOE has been noted in the five years preceding the fiscal year. Actual effect of noncompliance will be dependent on the District's MOE compliance in the subsequent years. Perspective: Previous five-year annual Moe reports and the report available as of the date of testing based on 2020-2021 fiscal year data shows the District has been and is in compliance with MOE requirements. However, preliminary calculations using 2021-2022 fiscal year data show the District will not comply with MOE requirements when final report become available. Questioned Costs: $0 Auditors' Recommendation: CRI recommends monitoring of enrollment projections and coordinating meetings with human resources and payroll departments to identify timely impact when staff funding changes occur. CRI also recommends quarterly reviews of actual expenditures compared to budget to ensure that MOE tests will be met by the year-end. Management Reponse: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 181.
Level of Effort - Maintenance of effort- Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies AL#84.010A Passed through Texas Education Agency 21610101108908 22610101108908 Criteria: Per Texas Education Agency(TEA)guidance on ESEA Section 8521, when the district (LEA) is awarded ESSA Funds, LEA's are required to comply with Level of Effort - Maintenance of Effort(MOE) on which the District must maintain a minimum of 90%of its expenditures for public education from state and local funds from one year to the next. Per 2cfr 200.303, non-federal entities should establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance, such as monitoring expenditures on the state and local funds throughout the year. Condition: Preliminary calculation of the MOE compliance using 2021-2022 fiscal year data to be finalized subsequent to year end, shows that the LEA will not pass four compliance tests to comply with MOE. Cause: District continued to have a decrease in student enrollment and had a significant number of staff change of funding source. District also received alternative sources of revenues that made the district expend more with those other grants causing the noncompliance in MOE. Effect: Per section 8521(b)(1), ESEA, If the LEA fails to meet MOE compliance requirements and if the LEA failed to meet the MOE requirement in one or more of the five immediately preceding fiscal years, the District could receive notification form TEA indicating that a reduction of the amount of funds allocated under ESEA-covered programs in exact proportion to the LEA'S failure to meet the requirements would occur. No noncompliance in MOE has been noted in the five years preceding the fiscal year. Actual effect of noncompliance will be dependent on the District's MOE compliance in the subsequent years. Perspective: Previous five-year annual Moe reports and the report available as of the date of testing based on 2020-2021 fiscal year data shows the District has been and is in compliance with MOE requirements. However, preliminary calculations using 2021-2022 fiscal year data show the District will not comply with MOE requirements when final report become available. Questioned Costs: $0 Auditors' Recommendation: CRI recommends monitoring of enrollment projections and coordinating meetings with human resources and payroll departments to identify timely impact when staff funding changes occur. CRI also recommends quarterly reviews of actual expenditures compared to budget to ensure that MOE tests will be met by the year-end. Management Reponse: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 181.
Level of Effort - Maintenance of effort- Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies AL#84.010A Passed through Texas Education Agency 21610101108908 22610101108908 Criteria: Per Texas Education Agency(TEA)guidance on ESEA Section 8521, when the district (LEA) is awarded ESSA Funds, LEA's are required to comply with Level of Effort - Maintenance of Effort(MOE) on which the District must maintain a minimum of 90%of its expenditures for public education from state and local funds from one year to the next. Per 2cfr 200.303, non-federal entities should establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance, such as monitoring expenditures on the state and local funds throughout the year. Condition: Preliminary calculation of the MOE compliance using 2021-2022 fiscal year data to be finalized subsequent to year end, shows that the LEA will not pass four compliance tests to comply with MOE. Cause: District continued to have a decrease in student enrollment and had a significant number of staff change of funding source. District also received alternative sources of revenues that made the district expend more with those other grants causing the noncompliance in MOE. Effect: Per section 8521(b)(1), ESEA, If the LEA fails to meet MOE compliance requirements and if the LEA failed to meet the MOE requirement in one or more of the five immediately preceding fiscal years, the District could receive notification form TEA indicating that a reduction of the amount of funds allocated under ESEA-covered programs in exact proportion to the LEA'S failure to meet the requirements would occur. No noncompliance in MOE has been noted in the five years preceding the fiscal year. Actual effect of noncompliance will be dependent on the District's MOE compliance in the subsequent years. Perspective: Previous five-year annual Moe reports and the report available as of the date of testing based on 2020-2021 fiscal year data shows the District has been and is in compliance with MOE requirements. However, preliminary calculations using 2021-2022 fiscal year data show the District will not comply with MOE requirements when final report become available. Questioned Costs: $0 Auditors' Recommendation: CRI recommends monitoring of enrollment projections and coordinating meetings with human resources and payroll departments to identify timely impact when staff funding changes occur. CRI also recommends quarterly reviews of actual expenditures compared to budget to ensure that MOE tests will be met by the year-end. Management Reponse: Management agrees with the finding. See corrective action plan on page 181.