Audit 45800

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$24.71M
Findings
4
Programs
3
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-10-01
Auditor: Bdo USA PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
39990 2022-003 - - M
39991 2022-002 - - M
616432 2022-003 - - M
616433 2022-002 - - M

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $4.41M Yes 1
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $500,075 - 0
93.297 Teenage Pregnancy Prevention Program $11,227 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
XTMHXQGEYUN5 Sam Unglo Auditee
4044875410 La Shaun King Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Georgia Alliance of Boys & Girls Clubs, Inc. and Boys & Girls Clubs in Georgia, Inc. (together, the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the combined financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Contingency Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The grant revenue amounts received are subject to audit and adjustment. If any expenditures are disallowed by the grantor agencies as a result of such an audit, any claim for reimbursement to the grantor agencies would become a liability of the Organization. In the opinion of management, all grant expenditures are in compliance with the terms of the grant agreements and applicable federal laws and regulations.

Finding Details

FINDING 2022-003 Program Information: COVID-19 Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): Federal Compliance Requirement: M. Subrecipient Monitoring - The pass-through entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). The State of Georgia stipulates GEER II Funds may not be used for administrative or executive salaries or benefits, or for any purpose not permitted under Section 312 of the CRRSAA. Condition: The Organization did not have sufficient monitoring processes in place to detect unallowable personnel costs charged to the GEER grant. The Organization did not maintain sufficient audit evidence for subrecipient payroll charges under the grant. Cause: Lack of administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient monitoring requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: $48,121 Context: We noted the following exceptions: For 11 of 51 monthly invoices selected for testing, the Organization did not properly identify unallowable personnel costs charged to the grant. For 17 of 51 monthly invoices selected for testing, the Organization did not properly verify hours charged to the grant by club employees. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization enhance its policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring to properly detect and prevent unallowable charges to the grant as well as maintain sufficient audit evidence for all grant expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements and will continue to follow these enhanced policies to properly detect and prevent unallowable charges to the grant. Management will implement monitoring processes to ensure subrecipients submit sufficient documentation prior to disbursing funds.
FINDING 2022-002 Program Information: COVID-19 Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) and COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (84.425U) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): 2 CFR section 200.516(a)(6) (a) The auditor must report the following as audit findings in a schedule of findings and questioned costs: (6) Known or likely fraud affecting a Federal award, unless such fraud is otherwise reported as an audit finding in the schedule of findings and questioned costs for Federal awards. Condition: A subrecipient of the Organization reported alleged fraud arising from grant mismanagement and misuse related to GEER and ESSER funding. Cause: Alleged collusion between employees at the subrecipient entity. Effect or Potential Effect: Unknown at this time. Questioned Costs: Not determinable. Context: Two employees of the subrecipient entity are alleged to have colluded in order to perpetrate fraud against the entity. The alleged fraud is purported to include alleged misappropriation of assets as well as alleged direct financial fraud. Once the Organization was alerted to the fraud, a funding hold was placed on the subrecipient entity, pending the results of ongoing investigations. Both employees alleged to have committed the fraud are no longer employed at the subrecipient organization. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization continue to monitor the various investigations of the alleged fraud currently taking place. We further recommend that the Organization consider requiring subrecipient entities to submit disclosures of any workplace nepotism related to personnel with financial or reporting responsibilities. If personnel with reporting responsibilities are related to one another, the organization should require that subrecipient entities detail what additional review process or internal controls will take place to mitigate potential risks that may arise from workplace nepotism. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will continue to closely monitor the situation.
FINDING 2022-003 Program Information: COVID-19 Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): Federal Compliance Requirement: M. Subrecipient Monitoring - The pass-through entity must monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f)). The State of Georgia stipulates GEER II Funds may not be used for administrative or executive salaries or benefits, or for any purpose not permitted under Section 312 of the CRRSAA. Condition: The Organization did not have sufficient monitoring processes in place to detect unallowable personnel costs charged to the GEER grant. The Organization did not maintain sufficient audit evidence for subrecipient payroll charges under the grant. Cause: Lack of administrative oversight with respect to subrecipient monitoring requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements. Questioned Costs: $48,121 Context: We noted the following exceptions: For 11 of 51 monthly invoices selected for testing, the Organization did not properly identify unallowable personnel costs charged to the grant. For 17 of 51 monthly invoices selected for testing, the Organization did not properly verify hours charged to the grant by club employees. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization enhance its policies and procedures over subrecipient monitoring to properly detect and prevent unallowable charges to the grant as well as maintain sufficient audit evidence for all grant expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will update subrecipient monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with subrecipient monitoring requirements and will continue to follow these enhanced policies to properly detect and prevent unallowable charges to the grant. Management will implement monitoring processes to ensure subrecipients submit sufficient documentation prior to disbursing funds.
FINDING 2022-002 Program Information: COVID-19 Governor?s Emergency Education Relief Fund (84.425C) and COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (84.425U) Criteria or Specific Requirement (Including Statutory, Regulatory or Other Citation): 2 CFR section 200.516(a)(6) (a) The auditor must report the following as audit findings in a schedule of findings and questioned costs: (6) Known or likely fraud affecting a Federal award, unless such fraud is otherwise reported as an audit finding in the schedule of findings and questioned costs for Federal awards. Condition: A subrecipient of the Organization reported alleged fraud arising from grant mismanagement and misuse related to GEER and ESSER funding. Cause: Alleged collusion between employees at the subrecipient entity. Effect or Potential Effect: Unknown at this time. Questioned Costs: Not determinable. Context: Two employees of the subrecipient entity are alleged to have colluded in order to perpetrate fraud against the entity. The alleged fraud is purported to include alleged misappropriation of assets as well as alleged direct financial fraud. Once the Organization was alerted to the fraud, a funding hold was placed on the subrecipient entity, pending the results of ongoing investigations. Both employees alleged to have committed the fraud are no longer employed at the subrecipient organization. Identification as a Repeat Finding: No similar findings noted in the prior year. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization continue to monitor the various investigations of the alleged fraud currently taking place. We further recommend that the Organization consider requiring subrecipient entities to submit disclosures of any workplace nepotism related to personnel with financial or reporting responsibilities. If personnel with reporting responsibilities are related to one another, the organization should require that subrecipient entities detail what additional review process or internal controls will take place to mitigate potential risks that may arise from workplace nepotism. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management will continue to closely monitor the situation.