Audit 42168

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$39.13M
Findings
12
Programs
7
Organization: Belhaven University (MS)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-11-16
Auditor: Forvis LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
48940 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
48941 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
48942 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
48943 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
48944 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
48945 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
625382 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
625383 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - N
625384 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
625385 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
625386 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
625387 2022-001 Material Weakness - A

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $30.05M Yes 1
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $3.78M Yes 1
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $427,643 Yes 0
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $394,721 Yes 0
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants (teach Grants) $141,383 Yes 0
84.031 Higher Education_institutional Aid $103,158 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $20,000 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
Q455CMG64AA4 Sheryl S. Vittitoe Auditee
6019688779 Sara Grenier Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Federal Loan Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Belhaven University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. For purposes of the Schedule, loans made to students under the Federal Direct Student Loans Program are presented as federal expenditures. Neither the funds advanced to students, nor the outstanding loan balance are included in the financial statements since the loans are made and subsequently collected by the federal government.
Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Belhaven University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Belhaven University under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Belhaven University, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of Belhaven University.

Finding Details

Federal Pell Grant Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loans, Assistance Listing Number 84.268 U.S. Department of Education Program Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting (34 CFR 690.93(b)(2); 34 CFR 682.610; 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions are required to report enrollment information. Condition ? The University?s processes did not ensure timely and accurate student status reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Questioned costs ? $0 Context ? Out of the population of 1,927 students with student attendance changes a sample of 25 students was selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be statistically valid. There were 14 attributes tested for each student with at least one status change. Campus-Level records: 1. OPEID Number 2. Enrollment Effective Date 3. Enrollment Status 4. Certification Date Program-Level records: 5. OPEID Number 6. CIP Code 7. CIP Year 8. Credential Level 9. Published Program Length Measurement 10. Published Program Length 11. Program Begin Date 12. Program Enrollment Status 13. Program Enrollment Effective Date Other Records 14. Student changed his or her permanent addressThe University reported the following enrollment status changes incorrectly: ? The University reported the incorrect Campus Enrollment Effective Date for six students ? The University reported the incorrect Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Effective Date for 10 students ? The University failed to report enrollment status changes within the required 60-day timeframe for three students ? The University failed to report changes in student permanent address within the required 60-day timeframe for three students The above errors were noted in 12 of the 25 students selected at varying levels. Effect ? The University reported incorrect dates for students? status changes, incorrect enrollment statuses, and did not ensure timely submission of reports of changes in enrollment status and permanent address information. Cause ? The University?s processes did not ensure status changes were reported timely and accurately. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? The University should update their controls to ensure changes in students? enrollment status are reported in a timely and accurate manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University?s Registrar?s Office is reviewing the National Student Loan Data Systems (NSLDS) enrollment reporting guide, receiving annual training on updates, and amending reporting procedures as needed. Any revisions will be reviewed by Student Financial Services Office to ensure compliance with updated financial aid policy and procedures.
Federal Pell Grant Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loans, Assistance Listing Number 84.268 U.S. Department of Education Program Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting (34 CFR 690.93(b)(2); 34 CFR 682.610; 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions are required to report enrollment information. Condition ? The University?s processes did not ensure timely and accurate student status reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Questioned costs ? $0 Context ? Out of the population of 1,927 students with student attendance changes a sample of 25 students was selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be statistically valid. There were 14 attributes tested for each student with at least one status change. Campus-Level records: 1. OPEID Number 2. Enrollment Effective Date 3. Enrollment Status 4. Certification Date Program-Level records: 5. OPEID Number 6. CIP Code 7. CIP Year 8. Credential Level 9. Published Program Length Measurement 10. Published Program Length 11. Program Begin Date 12. Program Enrollment Status 13. Program Enrollment Effective Date Other Records 14. Student changed his or her permanent addressThe University reported the following enrollment status changes incorrectly: ? The University reported the incorrect Campus Enrollment Effective Date for six students ? The University reported the incorrect Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Effective Date for 10 students ? The University failed to report enrollment status changes within the required 60-day timeframe for three students ? The University failed to report changes in student permanent address within the required 60-day timeframe for three students The above errors were noted in 12 of the 25 students selected at varying levels. Effect ? The University reported incorrect dates for students? status changes, incorrect enrollment statuses, and did not ensure timely submission of reports of changes in enrollment status and permanent address information. Cause ? The University?s processes did not ensure status changes were reported timely and accurately. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? The University should update their controls to ensure changes in students? enrollment status are reported in a timely and accurate manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University?s Registrar?s Office is reviewing the National Student Loan Data Systems (NSLDS) enrollment reporting guide, receiving annual training on updates, and amending reporting procedures as needed. Any revisions will be reviewed by Student Financial Services Office to ensure compliance with updated financial aid policy and procedures.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.
Federal Pell Grant Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loans, Assistance Listing Number 84.268 U.S. Department of Education Program Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting (34 CFR 690.93(b)(2); 34 CFR 682.610; 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions are required to report enrollment information. Condition ? The University?s processes did not ensure timely and accurate student status reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Questioned costs ? $0 Context ? Out of the population of 1,927 students with student attendance changes a sample of 25 students was selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be statistically valid. There were 14 attributes tested for each student with at least one status change. Campus-Level records: 1. OPEID Number 2. Enrollment Effective Date 3. Enrollment Status 4. Certification Date Program-Level records: 5. OPEID Number 6. CIP Code 7. CIP Year 8. Credential Level 9. Published Program Length Measurement 10. Published Program Length 11. Program Begin Date 12. Program Enrollment Status 13. Program Enrollment Effective Date Other Records 14. Student changed his or her permanent addressThe University reported the following enrollment status changes incorrectly: ? The University reported the incorrect Campus Enrollment Effective Date for six students ? The University reported the incorrect Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Effective Date for 10 students ? The University failed to report enrollment status changes within the required 60-day timeframe for three students ? The University failed to report changes in student permanent address within the required 60-day timeframe for three students The above errors were noted in 12 of the 25 students selected at varying levels. Effect ? The University reported incorrect dates for students? status changes, incorrect enrollment statuses, and did not ensure timely submission of reports of changes in enrollment status and permanent address information. Cause ? The University?s processes did not ensure status changes were reported timely and accurately. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? The University should update their controls to ensure changes in students? enrollment status are reported in a timely and accurate manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University?s Registrar?s Office is reviewing the National Student Loan Data Systems (NSLDS) enrollment reporting guide, receiving annual training on updates, and amending reporting procedures as needed. Any revisions will be reviewed by Student Financial Services Office to ensure compliance with updated financial aid policy and procedures.
Federal Pell Grant Program, Assistance Listing Number 84.063 Federal Direct Student Loans, Assistance Listing Number 84.268 U.S. Department of Education Program Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting (34 CFR 690.93(b)(2); 34 CFR 682.610; 34 CFR 685.309). Institutions are required to report enrollment information. Condition ? The University?s processes did not ensure timely and accurate student status reporting to National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). Questioned costs ? $0 Context ? Out of the population of 1,927 students with student attendance changes a sample of 25 students was selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be statistically valid. There were 14 attributes tested for each student with at least one status change. Campus-Level records: 1. OPEID Number 2. Enrollment Effective Date 3. Enrollment Status 4. Certification Date Program-Level records: 5. OPEID Number 6. CIP Code 7. CIP Year 8. Credential Level 9. Published Program Length Measurement 10. Published Program Length 11. Program Begin Date 12. Program Enrollment Status 13. Program Enrollment Effective Date Other Records 14. Student changed his or her permanent addressThe University reported the following enrollment status changes incorrectly: ? The University reported the incorrect Campus Enrollment Effective Date for six students ? The University reported the incorrect Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Status for five students ? The University reported the incorrect Program Enrollment Effective Date for 10 students ? The University failed to report enrollment status changes within the required 60-day timeframe for three students ? The University failed to report changes in student permanent address within the required 60-day timeframe for three students The above errors were noted in 12 of the 25 students selected at varying levels. Effect ? The University reported incorrect dates for students? status changes, incorrect enrollment statuses, and did not ensure timely submission of reports of changes in enrollment status and permanent address information. Cause ? The University?s processes did not ensure status changes were reported timely and accurately. Identification as repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? The University should update their controls to ensure changes in students? enrollment status are reported in a timely and accurate manner. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University?s Registrar?s Office is reviewing the National Student Loan Data Systems (NSLDS) enrollment reporting guide, receiving annual training on updates, and amending reporting procedures as needed. Any revisions will be reviewed by Student Financial Services Office to ensure compliance with updated financial aid policy and procedures.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.
COVID-19 ? Education Stabilization Fund, Assistance Listing No. 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Award Year 2021-2022 Criteria or specific requirement ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed? CARES Act Section 18004(c); CRRSAA section 314(c)(3) and ARP section 2003 Condition ? The institution applied emergency grants to students and applied amounts to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization from students. Questioned costs ? ALN 84.425E ? $10,645 ? Questioned costs include amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances for students who requested a cash grant. Context ? Out of a population of 1,028 grants to students, 25 student grants were selected for testing. Our sampling method was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Of the transactions tested, 4 were applied to students? outstanding account balances without obtaining explicit authorization for applying the amount to the outstanding balances. Three of the students request both to have the funds assist with tuition and other institutional charges and to have a cash grant, and one student only selected to get a cash grant. There was no documentation of clarification with the student how much they needed as a cash grant and how much they wanted to apply to tuition or institutional charges. Effect ? The University reduced outstanding accounts receivable balances rather than distributing emergency grants to students. Cause ? The University?s controls did not ensure that the amounts applied to students? outstanding account balances were only applied with authorization from the students. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable ? N/A Recommendation ? Management should review procedures around expenditures of federal awards to ensure that controls are properly designed to ensure expenditures on allowable activities. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions ? Belhaven University personnel are verifying 100 percent of CARES grant applications to be sure the University awarded CARES grant monies consistently and based on explicit authorization from students.