Audit 410531

FY End
2025-12-31
Total Expended
$2.61M
Findings
16
Programs
3
Organization: CITY OF STEWART (MN)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-09-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1229061 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1229062 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes P
1229063 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1229064 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1229065 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1229066 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes P
1229067 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1229068 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1229069 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1229070 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes P
1229071 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1229072 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I
1229073 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes P
1229074 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes P
1229075 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes P
1229076 2025-004 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
66.468 DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND $1.15M Yes 4
66.458 CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND $675,067 Yes 4
97.036 DISASTER GRANTS - PUBLIC ASSISTANCE (PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED DISASTERS) $3,665 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
VKSAHA42PN71 Kimberly Block Auditee
3205622518 Jordan Smith Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activities of federal award programs expended by the City of Stewart, Minnesota. The City's reporting entity is defined in Note 1 of the financial statements.
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal loan and grant activity of the City of Stewart, Minnesota under programs of the federal government for the year ended 2025. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the net position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Subpart E - Cost Principles, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
The City did not pass-through funds to subrecipients.
The City elected not to charge the de minimis indirect cost rate of 15% to federal programs.

Finding Details

Criteria: Generally, a system of internal control contemplates separation of duties such that no individual has responsibility to execute a transaction, have physical access to the related assets, and have responsibility or authority to record the transaction. Condition: Due to the limited size of the City's business staff, the City has limited segregation of duties. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The City has informed us that the small size of its business office staff precludes proper separation of duties at this time. Effect: The City is unable to maintain separation of incompatible duties. Cause: Limited number of staff in the business office. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to separate incompatible duties as best it can within the limits of what the City considers to be cost beneficial.
Criteria: Generally, a system of internal control includes the ability to understand and prepare the City's financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Condition: Due to the limited size of the City's business staff and related resources available, the City has relied upon the auditor to prepare the financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with GAAP. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The City has informed us that the small size and resources of its business office staff precludes the City from preparing its own financial statements. Effect: The City is unable to prepare GAAP financial statements. Cause: Limited number and qualifications of staff in the business office. Recommendation: We recommend that the City continue to review the auditor prepared financial statements with the intention of understanding and acceptance of responsibility for reporting under GAAP.
Criteria: A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements of the financial statements on a timely basis. A control deficiency that typically is considered significant is the identification by the auditor of a material misstatement in the financial statements that was not initially identified by the City's internal control. Condition: During our audit, we proposed numerous adjustments that resulted in significant changes to the City's financial statements. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: The City's limited size and training and qualifications of business office personnel have precluded the City from the ability to properly identify and correct financial misstatements. Effect: The City's inability to detect misstatements in the financial statements increases the likelihood that the financial statements may not be fairly presented. Cause: Inadequate internal controls and monitoring of internal controls by qualified City personnel. Recommendation: We recommend that the City review internal controls currently in place, then design and implement procedures to improve internal controls over financial reporting to detect misstatements in the financial statements.
Program: ALN 66.458 Clean Water State Revolving Fund ALN 66.468 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Criteria: As required by the OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200.318(a)), a non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures, provided that they conform to Federal law and the standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Condition: The City's procurment procedures do not conform to Uniform Guidance requirements. Effect: There is an increased risk of noncompliance with federal awards. Questioned Costs: N/A Cause: The City has not revised procurement procedures for many years. Recommendation: We recommend that the City revise their procurement procedures to conform with Minnesota statutes and Uniform Guidance.