Audit 402221

FY End
2025-08-31
Total Expended
$2.81M
Findings
10
Programs
1
Organization: Nexus Recovery Center Inc. (TX)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-05-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1215548 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1215549 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes L
1215550 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1215551 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes L
1215552 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1215553 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes L
1215554 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1215555 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes L
1215556 2025-001 Material Weakness Yes B
1215557 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.959 BLOCK GRANTS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE $97,541 Yes 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
CS8YXCYV86V5 Heather Ormand Auditee
2146211056 Brian Razloznik Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (Schedule) includes the federal and state grant activity of Nexus Recovery Center, Inc. (nonprofit organization), (Organization), and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and the Texas Grant Management Standards (TxGMS). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance or TxGMS, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Organization has elected to use the 10 percent de minimus indirect cost rate.
The Organization received grants totaling $437,644 that were included in government grant revenue on the statement of activities. These grants were not subject to the audit requirements of the Uniform Guidance or TxGMS and, therefore, were not included in the Schedule.
The Organization is required to provide 10% matching funds to fulfill its SMART Innovation Grant Program contract. These matching funds consist of contributions of financial assets. The Organization claimed $325,000 in matching funds for the year ended August 31, 2025.

Finding Details

Finding 2025‐001: Allowable Cost – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance. Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse ALN 93.959 Criteria: Section 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires recipients to implement robust internal controls to ensure compliance with cost principles for all transactions charged to the grant. The Organization’s control policies state that all Brex credit card charges are to be reviewed by the supervisor prior to being uploaded into the system. Condition: During allowable cost testing for federal grants, 2 out of the 25 sample items tested did not have documented approval from the supervisor. Cause: Due to oversight, a supervisor missed approving the charges. Effect: The Organization’s reporting of allowable costs is not fully documented in accordance with its internal control procedures over compliance. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: Management should implement trainings with supervisors to reiterate the importance of the controls related to documentation of approval for all transactions prior to the expense being paid.
Finding 2025‐002: Reporting – Significant deficiency in internal controls over compliance. Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse ALN 93.959 and SMART Innovation Program Criteria: Section 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires recipients to implement robust internal controls to ensure compliance for all required reporting submissions. Condition: Although the Organization has compensating controls in other compliance areas that helped prevent noncompliance over reporting, there were no specific controls regarding the review and approval of the required reporting submissions. Cause: The Organization did not have a standard procedure in place to review and approve the required reporting submissions prior to them being submitted to the grantor. Effect: The Organization’s required reporting submissions were not being reviewed and approved prior to submission in accordance with internal control procedures over compliance. Questioned Cost: None Recommendation: Management should implement controls to ensure documentation of review and approval prior to submission for all required reporting submissions is completed and retained.