Audit 398189

FY End
2025-06-30
Total Expended
$1.07M
Findings
10
Programs
9
Organization: Fort Cherry School District (PA)
Year: 2025 Accepted: 2026-04-09

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
1206214 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206215 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206216 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206217 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206218 2025-002 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206219 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206220 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206221 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206222 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN
1206223 2025-003 Material Weakness Yes ABEILN

Contacts

Name Title Type
JH3KQT59H3E5 Renee Miller Auditee
7247961551 Chad Agnew Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of the Fort Cherry School District and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements.
The School District passed and had approved by the appropriate agency budgets for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 for all federal programs.
Fort Cherry School District has elected to not use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: Federal regulations require non-federal entities to follow specific procurement standards when making purchases with federal award funds: • 2 CFR 200.320 requires the use of specific procurement methods (micro-purchase, small purchase, sealed bids, competitive proposals, etc.) based on the value of the transaction. • 2 CFR 200.318 requires the District to maintain oversight that ensures contractors perform in accordance with terms, conditions, and specifications. • 2 CFR 200.319 requires full and open competition and prohibits practices that restrict competition. • 2 CFR 200.324 requires cost or price analysis for certain procurements. • 2 CFR 200.213 requires verification that contractors are not suspended or debarred Condition: During testing of procurement transactions charged to the Child Nutrition Cluster, we noted that the District did not consistently follow the federal procurement standards required by 2 CFR 200.318-327. Specifically: The District did not obtain the required number of price or rate quotations for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. • For procurements that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold, the District did not maintain documentation supporting full and open competition. • In several cases, the District was unable to provide evidence that vendors were verified against the SAM.gov exclusion list prior to contract award. • Procurement files did not contain required elements such as cost/price analysis, written procurement method selection, or justification for sole-source procurements. The transactions identified totaled approximately $50,000, which represents a material portion of federal expenditures tested under this major program. Cause: The District did not employ adequate internal controls to ensure that all federally funded procurements consistently followed the federal procurement standards. Staff turnover and insufficient training regarding federal procurement requirements also contributed to the deficiencies. Recommendation: We recommend that the School District design and follow internal controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are followed to comply with Uniform Guidance standards. Effect: Failure to follow federal procurement requirements increases the risk of: • Noncompliance with the Uniform Guidance, • Potential favoritism or lack of competition, • Unallowable costs being charged to federal programs, and • Federal funds being used inefficiently or in a manner inconsistent with federal regulations. The nature and extent of the exceptions identified represent a material weakness in internal control and material noncompliance with procurement requirements. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.
Segregation of Duties - Child Nutrition Cluster Criteria: The small size of the School District's business office staff limits the extent of separation of duties. The basic premise in an ideal accounting office is that no one employee should have access to both physical assets and the related accounting records or to all phases of a transaction. Some examples of lack of segregation of duties at the School District are as follows: The individual who receives checks on a routine basis also prepares the deposit. The same individual also reviews the receivables aging trial balance, investigates receivable discrepancies, and maintains or authorizes receivables adjustments as well as investigates discrepancies or issues related to revenue. For the cafeteria, one person receives the cash receipts, enters the deposit into the accounting system, and makes the deposit at the fmancial institution. One employee initiates checks for expenditures, edits the vendor master file, and investigates discrepancies or issues related to expenditures. Condition: The School District has a limited number of staff responsible for or access to various stages of the accounting processes. Cause: The District does not have the number of employees necessary in the business office to properly segregate all duties. Recommendation: Ideally, the District would hire the number of staff necessary to segregate all duties. However, we realize segregation of duties is not practical, if not impossible. Because of this internal control situation, the responsibility of the Business Manager is greatly increased because the Board must rely on her knowledge of the everyday operations to discover any material changes in the School District's fmancial position. Effect: A lack in separation of duties makes the School District more susceptible to misappropriation of District Assets. Views of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan included in this report package.